Transcribe your podcast

But even now, our ally can't get his foot in the door. Even now, our ally can't get his foot in the door. And this brings me the last point I want to make tonight. Which is. When we're done. We believe that we will have made the case. Overwhelmingly of the president's guilt, that is, he's done what he's charged with. He withheld the money, he withheld the meeting. He used it to coerce Ukraine to do these political investigations.


He covered it up. He obstructed us. He's trying to obstruct you and he's violated the Constitution. But I want to address one other thing tonight. OK, he's guilty. OK. He's guilty. Does he really need to be removed? Does he really need to be removed? We have an election coming up, does he really need to be removed? He's guilty, you know, is there really any doubt about this?


I mean, do we really have any doubt about the facts here? Does anybody really question whether the president is capable of what he's charged with? No one is really making the argument Donald Trump would never do such a thing.


Because, of course, we know that he would. And of course, we know that he did. It's a somewhat different question, though, to ask. OK. It's pretty obvious whether we can say it publicly or we can't say it publicly. We all know what we're dealing here with this present. But does he really need to be removed? And this is why he needs to be removed. Donald Trump. Chose Rudy Giuliani. Over his own intelligence agencies, he chose Rudy Giuliani over his own FBI director.


He chose Rudy Giuliani over his own national security advisers when all of them were telling him this Ukraine 2016 stuff is kooky, crazy Russian propaganda.


He chose not to believe them. He chose to believe Rudy Giuliani. That makes him dangerous to us, to our country. That was Donald Trump's choice. Now, why would Donald Trump believe a man like Rudy Giuliani over a man like Christopher Wray?


OK. Why would anyone in their right mind believe Rudy Giuliani over Christopher Wright? Because he wanted to. And because what Rudy was offering him was something that would help him personally. And what Christopher Wray was offering him was merely the truth. What Christopher Wray was offering him was merely the information he needed to protect his country and its elections. But that's not good enough. What's in it for him? What's in it for Donald Trump? This is why he needs to be removed.


Now, you may be asking how much damage can he really do in the next several months until the election?


A lot. A lot of damage. Now, we just saw last week report that Russia. Tried to hack or maybe did hack prisma. OK. I don't know if they got in. I'm trying to find out. My colleagues on the Intel Committee, House and Senate, we're trying to find out, did the Russians get in? What are the Russian plans and intentions? Well, let's say they got in. And let's say they start dumping documents to interfere the next election.


Let's say they'd start dumping some real things they hacked from karisma, let's say they start dumping some fake things they didn't hack from Brisbane, but they want you to believe they did. Let's say they start blatantly interfering in our election again. To help Donald Trump. Can you have the least bit of confidence that Donald Trump will stand up to them and protect our national interests over his own personal interests? You know, you can't. Which makes him dangerous.


To this country, you know, you can't you know, you can't count on him. None of us can. None of us can. What happens if China got the message? Now you can say, well, he's just joking, of course. He didn't really mean China should investigate the Bidens. You know, that's no joke.


Now, maybe you could have argued three years ago when he said, hey, rush off your listening, hack Hillary's emails, maybe you could give them a freebie and say he was joking. But now we know better. Hours after he did that, Russia did in fact try to hack Hillary's emails. There's no mulligan here when it comes to our national security. So what if China does? Overtly or covertly start to help the Trump campaign. You think he's going to call him out on it or you think he's going to give him a better trade deal on it?


Can any of us really have the confidence that Donald Trump will put his personal interests? Head of the national interest, is there really any evidence in this presidency that should give us the iron clad confidence that he would do so? You know, you can't count on him to do that. That's the sad truth. You know, you can't count on him to do that.


The American people deserve a president they can count on to put their interests first. To put their interests first. Colonel Venkman said. Here right matters. Here right matters. Well, let me tell you something. If right. Doesn't matter. If right doesn't matter. It doesn't matter how good the constitution is. It doesn't matter how brilliant. The framers were. Doesn't matter how good or bad or advocacy in this trial is. Doesn't matter how well-written the oath of impartiality is, if right doesn't matter.


We're lost. If the truth doesn't matter, we're lost. The framers couldn't protect us from ourselves if right and truth don't matter. And you know that what he did was not right. You know, that's what they do in the old country. Colonel Vinton's father came from or the old country that my great grandfather came from. Or the old countries that your ancestors came from or maybe you came from. But here, right is supposed to matter. It's what's made us the greatest nation on earth.


No constitution can protect us, right? Doesn't matter any more. And you know. You can't trust this president do what's right for this country. You can trust he will do what's right for Donald Trump. He'll do it now. He's done it before. He'll do it for the next several months. He'll do it in the election if he's allowed to.


This is why. If you find him guilty. You must find that he should be removed. Because right matters. Because right matters. And the truth matters. Otherwise, we are lost. MOSTUE Jorgito is recognized as unanimous consent that the trial adjourned until 1:00 p.m. Friday, January the 24th, and that this order also constitute the adjournment.