From the New York Times, this is The Daily. I'm Rachel Abrams. Today, an outbreak of bird flu has been tearing through the nation's dairy farms and infecting more and more people. And now there are troubling signs that the United States might be closer to another pandemic, even as President Trump dismantles the country's public health system. My colleague Aporva Mandevilli explains how the virus has changed and why our government might be ill-equipped to respond. It's Thursday, February 13th. Apurva, hello.

Hello.

The last time we talked about bird blew on the show, which was last April, our colleague Emily Anthes was raising a modest amount of concern about the virus. She said it had been spreading pretty quickly and intensely in birds, and also it had started to show up in other animals. But at that point, it was not that much of a concern for people, but it could be soon. Since then, we've been checking in with you periodically just to ask, should we be worried now? You've told us at various points, no, not yet, but this week you told us yes, which was a little alarming. What is going on?

So Emily covers animals, and when you talk to her, the virus was really mainly a threat to animals and to wild birds. It was in birds all over the country. But since then, it really started infecting a lot of different kinds of animals, actually in a way that I've heard experts say they've never seen a virus do before. Then it also became quite clear that it is capable of jumping into people and causing problems in people. In fact, at the time when you talked to Emily, there were probably only a couple of cases, when now we have 68.

We'll get to those 68 in a minute. But first, can we just understand bird flu a little bit better and why it's infecting all these different animals in addition to people?

Yeah. So H5N1 is a bird flu virus, meaning it is really best adapted to infect birds. Usually, you might expect to see it occasionally in a different animal, just if an animal was in very close contact with an infected bird. But what we've been seeing now is that there are all kinds of animals, including mammals, that seem to be really susceptible to this virus. The range of animal species. We've gone from cats and deer and bears and sea mammals and raccoons and all of these animal species. And we've not really seen a virus gain that many new host species in such a short time. That's been really alarming to watch. According to a lot of the experts that I've talked to, they're like, we've never seen anything like this, where a virus just storms through animal populations. But also then to include people in that, we I've seen a lot of people get infected. So there's something about this virus that makes it quite promiscuous, if you will.

And how bad is it? How many animals is this actually killing?

Far too many. I mean, I have a Google alert for bird flu, and every morning I see emails about this new bird, these cranes, these poultry flocks in Long Island, these big cats in the zoo. Every day there's news of more and more dead birds and animals that are affected. Often, when it is a matter of a poultry flock, you have just a few birds that are affected. That means you might have to get rid of tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of birds. The scale of destruction is just It's staggering.

Does that have anything to do with the egg situation that we're seeing? I feel like every time I walk into a grocery store, there's a sign saying, Sorry, we don't have eggs, and the shelves are bare.

Unfortunately, that's directly related. We are seeing poultry flocks being killed at a really high rate because of infections. That's directly affecting egg supply, and we are going to see shortages of eggs. We are going to see those egg prices continuing to go up because we're still very much in the high circulation season for this virus. It's really everywhere right now, and so we're going to see more birds being affected and therefore, fewer eggs.

You mentioned that we've seen it in mammals. Can you talk about cattle, specifically? Obviously, agriculture is huge, and I'm wondering how that has been affected by all of this.

Yeah, that's really the number one thing that's made a lot of the scientists I talk to worry. We did not even really know that cattle were susceptible to this influenza. That was number one, already a big surprise. And then we started to hear about how the virus was affecting the cattle, and it was doing these bizarre things. First of all, there was a lot of virus in the milk of the cows, and the milk was turning this very thick, viscous yellow texture that some of the veterinarians I talked to said they'd never seen anything like that before. So that was all a big surprise. And then it seemed like that's also how the virus was getting around between herds is through milking machines because there was so much virus in the milk that it would contaminate the milking machines. And if they ended up using that for another herd or was transported through machines in some way or somebody's clothing, things like that, it was affecting other herds. And so it spread through the country that way. One thing that's been really alarming to see most recently is that it seems like some of the cows, first of all, stay infected for a really long time.

And then potentially, some of these cows are getting reinfected, which means that the virus can then circulate in cows, perhaps indefinitely, providing lots and lots of opportunities for it to continue to mutate and potentially evolve into dangerous forms.

To make it really, really simple, the longer this thing stays circulating in cows, the more cows it has a chance of infecting, which means that the chances that it's going to affect people only grows. Is that right?

That's correct. Also, the longer it stays in cows, we've been hearing that potentially the second time around, the cows may not show very many symptoms. If you know that a cow is sick, you can take precautions. You can make sure that the cow is isolated or the herd is isolated. But if you don't even know that they're sick because the symptoms are really mild, then you can't even really do much to keep them isolated and to prevent people from coming into contact with them or being careful when they do. So it just raises the stakes in a different way.

We've been talking about dairy cows, eggs, cattle. Obviously, that means beef and agriculture culture. Is this virus in the food supply?

Probably. We know that there are many cats that have gotten really sick. Some of them have died, and they've gotten it either from drinking raw milk that contains the virus, which we know is not safe. But also, some of them have gotten sick from eating raw pet food. Some of the experts I've talked to have pointed out if it's in raw pet food, it's probably in raw human food. People should be really careful about not eating raw meat, that they should really make sure they cook their meat really properly. They definitely should not be drinking raw milk. They should also be careful what their pets are putting in their mouths.

By pets, you mean house cats? Should people that have cats be doing anything or be concerned right now?

Well, they shouldn't be feeding them raw pet food, for one. But also, yeah, I have talked to experts who said it's not a great idea to let cats roam around outdoors where they might come into contact with dead birds that might be infected. Cats that have gotten infected have died some pretty gruesome deaths. They get these very severe neurological symptoms, and a lot of them end up dying.

That's really horrible to think about. I'm sure there's a lot of cat owners out there that are really grimacing right now But are people wondering, can an infected cat give it to a human? You mentioned earlier that 68 people have been infected. What do we know about how they got infected?

In most of the cases, they got infected by either being really close to interacting with an infected animal, like a dairy cattle in most of those cases, or poultry. There were three cases where they don't know how the person got infected, and so that's a bit of a mystery.

Is there anything about Are there cases that indicates that it's gotten more contagious or more likely to spread between people?

So far, we haven't really seen that. There was one set of people who lived in the same household in Missouri who there was some question that maybe they gave it to each But overall, we have not seen any signs that the virus is now jumping between people or knows how to do that. However, I will say there is a new version of the virus that's now circulating, and it was just seen in cattle in Nevada. And what they discovered is that it seems to already have a mutation that makes it easier for the virus to infect people. And the thing about that particular version of the virus is that we know of at least two people who've become infected with it who got very, very sick. So there was one person in America who died of H5N1, this patient in Louisiana. And then there was a 13-year-old teenager from Canada who both got infected with that version of the virus, and they were both sick for many weeks, and the Louisiana patient died. But the really worrisome part about that was that in both of those people, the virus continued to mutate while it was in the person and acquired some mutations that would make it easier for it to spread between people.

Fortunately, it did not do that. It didn't jump from them to anybody else. But it showed us that the virus is capable of doing that. And in both of these patients, the Canadian teenager and the Louisiana patient, one of the mutations was the same. Usually, when you see that, it means that that mutation gives the virus some advantage that it likes, that it's going to hang on to. It's just a sign that the virus is good at getting to the place where it can become better at infecting people.

So that's obviously quite terrifying, but it also sounds like there's a lot we don't know about the virus. So I guess I'm just wondering, how close are we to bird flu actually becoming a widespread serious problem for people?

We may not be close at all. We may never get there. We may never get to a point where the virus has all the mutations it needs to set off a human pandemic. But what the experts I talk to are saying is every time the virus infects a person or a cow, it gets another shot at getting the right combination of mutations. The more chances it has, the better the odds that at some point it's going to get the winning combination. And if it does that, we are not ready.

We'll be right back. So Aporva, you were saying that we really aren't ready to handle a bird flu outbreak among humans, if that happens, which just honestly feels really surprising given the fact that we just went through a pandemic. So I'm curious, what should we be doing that we haven't been doing?

Well, we know from COVID that the number one thing we have to do to figure out how widespread a disease is is to test. So over the past year, we've actually not been doing the testing we would need to do to know how far this virus has spread. We have not been testing enough animals. We have not been testing enough people. We have not been testing enough of the contacts of the people that we knew got infected. We also have not gotten the access to all of the samples we would need to see, Oh, how much is this virus changing? How fast is it changing? What mutations does it have? We're really operating quite in the dark. That is not all on the federal agencies either. When it comes to public health, actually, a lot of the authority on what can be done and what can't really comes from the states. Most of the states that have been affected by the bird flu outbreak have really not taken the kinds of measures that they would need to to get farmers on board, farm owners on board, make sure that people are tested, make sure that cows are tested.

Very, very little of that has happened.

A lot of what you're describing this monitoring, testing, a lot of this sounds like government intervention. At least on the federal level, what we've seen in the last three weeks is a new administration take charge and basically take a sledgehammer to a lot of federal agencies that I would imagine would have a hand in a lot of the pandemic response or preparedness that you've described. So can you tell us how has what we've seen since Trump took office affected our potential ability to respond if bird flu actually does break out?

Yeah, the darkness just got even darker. There's just so little information coming out about what's going on. The Trump administration muted all the federal officials. They told them that they couldn't communicate with even state partners. They couldn't communicate with each other. They couldn't have group meetings, scientific meetings within the agencies. They couldn't talk to the World Health Organization. There was just this communications blackout. What it has meant is that we've gotten information just really slowly about everything. What information we have gotten, we're not even sure if it is giving us the full picture. For example, there is a set of reports that comes out from the CDC every week. It's been more than two weeks since they were supposed to come out. We haven't seen those yet. And that was supposed to include some papers about bird flu. So it's just It's really hard to know to what extent we are being stymied by this communications ban with very crucial information. Some of that may be being loosened. But at the same time, these agencies are under attack in other ways. We're hearing that large numbers of CDC people might actually be let go, and some of that has already begun.

We know that the CDC was asked to make a list of people who had been there for a short time, and many of those people have already been let go. They also got rid of the so-called Epidemic Intelligence Officers. They're like the fellows who do a lot of the shoe leather epidemiology work they would need to be doing.

Basically, what you're saying is that we're getting rid of people who would be at the front lines of a pandemic response nationally, just as things are seeming like they're taking a turn for the worse.

That is what I'm saying. We also know that Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who may end up being the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, so overseeing the CDC and other health agencies is not a big fan of infectious disease research, has made many anti-vaccine comments. We're just in the situation where we really don't know if bird flu were to become a problem, whether the agency would be empowered to do the work they would need to be doing. I mean, elsewhere in the world, there's very much an acknowledgement that there may be another pandemic. There probably will be one, in fact, in our lifetimes. And so other countries have really been trying prepare for that by coming up with this global pandemic treaty and coming up with rules that all countries abide by if there were to be an outbreak, like sharing information with each other. The US was very much a part of those discussions, but we have just announced our intention to withdraw from the World Health Organization. In the same breath, President Trump also said that we would no longer really participate in these global efforts to come to an agreement on how the world would deal with the pandemic.

Aparva, what about a vaccine? Do we even have one?

We do have a vaccine. It's actually a two-dose vaccine, and we have a few million doses. But obviously, that would be a drop in the bucket if this were to become really big. We could get more, especially if we did mRNA, which we know can be done really quickly, as we saw in COVID. But it would still take, I think, several months before we had enough for the entire population. One of the things that has to happen before we could get enough everybody is also that the CDC scientists typically test to make sure that whatever version of the virus ends up circulating is still a good match for the vaccines that are in the stockpile. If they are, then yes, they can immediately ramp those up. But if it's not a match, then they have to create a new version of that vaccine and then ramp it up. All of those things take time. It would be a while before we were all protected.

Do we have any idea what the mortality rate of the virus is without a vaccine?

Yeah, that's a really good question, and we actually don't know. When we have seen this virus in action in Southeast Asia, we've seen mortality rates of something like 50%, but I don't think we can assume that that's going to be the same here because we don't know if, for example, those people died because they were exposed to huge amounts of virus, and that's why they got really sick. What we do know is that apart from the one person who died in Louisiana and then the Canadian teenager, most people have had relatively milder symptoms. I say relatively because some of them did have things like pink eye, but not the pink eye that you and I think of. They had some level of hemorrhaging blood in the eyes, essentially. Oh, my God. Yeah. They did have some severe symptoms, but they did not get sick enough to the point of needing ICU care or dying, except for the two people I mentioned.

But if bird flu is actually a 50% mortality rate, I mean, that would be astronomical, especially when compared to something like COVID, right?

It wouldn't even need to be anywhere close to 50 %. It could be 5 %, and it would still be more devastating. It would be really just a very difficult thing to get our arms around. Also, because, as you know, flu tends to affect kids and older people. In the past pandemics, like the 1918 pandemic, it affected young, healthy people in their 20s and 30s. We don't know exactly what the virus is going end up doing, but it's not a given that like COVID, it would be really bad for people who are older or who have certain underlying conditions and that it would mostly leave kids alone. I think we got lucky in those ways with COVID.

But we also just have no idea how contagious it would be or how it would spread?

We don't. I mean, we have some clues just based on what it's been doing as we've been talking about. But one thing that's really clear is that for it to become a pandemic virus, it has to change. When it changes, we don't know what other ways it's going to change in and whether it'll have to give up some qualities like contagiousness. Will it become much milder in its quest to become more contagious? We don't know what trade offs the virus is going to end up having to make.

So Aporva, everything that you're saying is, I got to be honest, making me nervous. It just sounds like there's so much we don't know about the virus, plus we're not testing, plus the virus is changing in unpredictable ways. And that, combined with the fact that we're not sure whether what we're hearing from the CDC is reliable or if we're getting enough information, all of that is a bad combination.

Yeah. I mean, we do know that over the past year, as little as was going on with things like testing, when there was big news, we did hear from the CDC. They would hold these joint press conferences along with the USDA and the FDA, and they would talk through something like the Nevada case. They did give out some public health messages. They did say, don't drink raw milk, things like that. They may not have said it loudly or often enough, but they did say it. I was just getting to a point with them in December where they were starting to say more things like, This is a low-risk situation right now, but it could change very quickly. But now they've gone silent. I don't think it's because there's nothing to say, because clearly there is. It just seems like we have not really any good visibility on what they're doing or not doing and how much the information they are allowed to give us. It is going to be incumbent upon us as citizens to be very careful.

Okay, so just to sum everything up, you've described a lot of worrying signs, but we have not yet seen a lot of evidence of human-to-human transmission or that that's coming anytime soon. The more alarming thing is that what you have described is how unprepared we are to tackle bird flu in this very moment. I have to say, I think a lot of people listening to this are going to be astounded by that, considering that we're coming up on the five-year anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Yeah, I think it is very important to remember that we may never get to a bird flu pandemic. It may never happen. But the fact that we went through COVID is actually what's making us in worse shape than we were before.

I think what we're seeing here is really a reaction to what happened during COVID.

We're seeing it in so many different ways. If you look at local public health departments, people left because they were being harassed for recommending vaccines or talking about public health measures. Public health departments have been gutded A lot of states passed laws taking power away from public health departments and their ability to make recommendations. People don't have trust in public health agencies. There's just this general antipathy toward the idea of dealing with another outbreak at all. That's really what I worry about, that even if we did have a situation that we would need to deal with, that too many people would be unwilling to deal with it, at least until it was too late.

Aporva, on that note, thank you so much.

Thank you.

We'll be right back. Here's what else you need to know today. On Wednesday, the Trump administration took a series of steps that strengthened Russia's position in its war against Ukraine. President Trump said he had a, quote, lengthy and highly productive phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the beginning of what Trump characterized as an end to the war that he had pledged to finish as soon as he took office. The call signified that Western efforts to isolate Russia diplomatically had collapsed three years after the war began. The call came the same day that Trump's Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegset, said the US did not support Ukraine joining NATO as part of any realistic peace plan, and that it was also unrealistic for Ukraine to restore its borders as they were before Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. And, Tulsi Gabbard was sworn in as Trump's Director of National Intelligence, hours after the Senate voted to confirm her nomination. Despite a contentious hearing that featured tough questions from Democrats and several Republicans, every Republican except Mitch McDonald voted to confirm. The Senate also advanced Robert F. Kennedy Jr. As Trump's nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.

Kennedy's vote fell along party lines, which was a stunning show of Republican support for a man who's refusal to accept scientific consensus has alarmed many public health leaders. Today's episode was produced by Alex Stern and Eric Grupke, with help from Carlos Prieto. It was edited by Chris Haxel and Paige Cawet, with help from Ben Calhoun. Contains original music by Dan Powell and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Lansberg of WNDYRLE. Special thanks to Emily Anthes and Alan Burdick. That's it for The Daily. I'm Rachael Abrams. See you tomorrow.