Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
So as I said in my thesis, I do every morning for parler here. Believe it or not, Twitter is at it again. The tech overlords of Twitter, I'm telling you folks, I'm not making this up again. I'm one of the owners of parliament who put that out there. But the overlords of Twitter really don't care. I'm not kidding. They don't care about conservatives at all. They did. What did they do? They're now throttling, temporarily limiting, temporarily suspended Donald Trump Junior's account.
I got more on that in the show, too. Yes, yes, yes. Believe it or not, I got more of that. I've got some new data on Korona and a Spygate connection between Spygate and impeachment. Didn't discuss yesterday that slapping us all right in the face. It's a loaded show. Let me get right to it. Rachel show brought to you by Express VPN, surf the web with peace of mind, get a VPN and protect yourself today.
Go to express VPN dotcom slash Bongino. Don't wait. Welcome to Dan Bongino, show producer. Joe, how are you today? I'm fine, sir.
I'm doing well. I wasn't ready for that one though. Yeah, well, neither was I because I had a whole show planned. So usually the way the show works is I line up page one and page two is the stuff I'll get to later. I had everything planned out and then this story just broke about Twitter throttling Don Junior and I thought we got to do so a lot to get through today. We got that and some Spygate follow up stuff from yesterday.
Today show bunch of our friends and simply say, if you to think about home security companies, most trappy with high prices is tricky contracts and really terrible customer support. So why there are a lot of options out there. There's only one no brainer and that's simply safe, super easy to set up. We love it. Have the app. My wife set it up in about an hour, maybe hour and a half. We actually just added to it here.
It's a great home security system. I know a little bit about security works great for us. Simply say it's got everything you need to protect your home. With none of the drawbacks of traditional home security, it's got an arsenal of sensors and cameras that blanket every room, window and door tailored specifically for your home. We've got cameras everywhere. Professional monitoring keeps you, keeps watch day and night. Send the police, fire, medical professionals. If there's an emergency, you can set it up yourself in under an hour.
Took us a little ah, we added to it, but we just we wanted the whole place like lockdown. Just peel and stick the sensors. Exactly. We need them. It's really that simple. No technicians required. There's no contract, no pushy sales guys, no hidden fees, no fine print. It all starts for how much. Fifteen dollars a month. It starts at fifteen dollars a month.
I'm not the only one who thinks if we save this great U.S. News and World Report named it the best overall home security of twenty twenty. Try simply save today. Go to simply save dotcom slash Dan Bongino. You'll get free shipping in a 60 day risk free trial. There's nothing to lose that's simply safe. Imply safe, simply safe. Dot com slash. Dan Bongino, simply safe dotcom. Dan Bongino, go check it out today.
All right, let's go. It's a weird blink.
Had an urge to blank my left eye right there, which is very strange. All right. So let me just get to the story first before I get to some of the other stuff, because it's important. Right before we got on the air this happened, there was a press conference up on Capitol Hill about hydroxy chloroquine, the anti malaria, lupus, drug, autoimmune disorder drug, and some cases being used to treat coronavirus. And apparently the tech tyrants don't like that.
Again, we're living in the Soviet Union now when it comes to tech platforms, they will tell you what you can and can't hear because they think you're too stupid to hear for yourself. Listen, it happens to us all the time, folks. We're not intimidated. We're working on backup plans now. But I'm not kidding. Whenever we mention any of these topics at all, what ends up happening is our show is throttled on YouTube. You don't believe me?
Look for yourself. Go to our YouTube channel whether you want to subscribe or not. I don't want this that I don't want. There's no ulterior motive here. Go to our YouTube channel. It's YouTube, Dotcom, Bunshiro, and look at our views whenever we mention anything about coronavirus and we cite actual studies and we just read them. If it doesn't comport with the leftist thinking on the coronavirus, the show is just look at the numbers we were doing a week of one hundred eighty two hundred thousand views and then we dared mention some some other information outside the mainstream and boom of have these these tech overlords can't stand it.
They are committed to telling you only what they want you to hear because they think you're too stupid to evaluate the information yourself. Well, what happened? Well, Don Jr., Don Trump Junior tweeted out a video of some medical professionals up on Capitol Hill talking about hydroxy chloroquine. And look what happened. This is Andrew Sarabia and breaking Twitter. And Jack Dorsey suspended Don Trump Junior for posting a viral video of medical doctors. Talking about hydroxy chloroquine, they really limited some of his account for you, wasn't totally suspended, but they demanded he deleted the tweet.
This is really happening. Big tech is the biggest threat to free expression in America today, and they're continuing to engage in open election interference. Full stop. Ladies and gentlemen, he's right again, I've mentioned parlor before, I try not to hammer it too much on this show, I only try to talk about it when it's relevant to the discourse of the day, because I don't want to batter you over the head with stuff like, hey, by the book, do this.
But folks, I'm only involved with it because I believe in it. Believe me, it's not about the money thing. It I have a financial stake in it, but I really genuinely give a damn about what's going on right now. That's why I do stuff. That's why I didn't like Drudge, I started Bongino report, you have to do stuff, talk is great, it's really fantastic. But sometimes you've got to put skin in the game and go out there like all of you do, and you have to do stuff.
That's what changes things. That's why we started parler. Because I got tired of this, now I just want to bring this up and I don't say this because I get a very few e-mails but say out of, say I of one hundred emails, I'll get about the tech Tyran fight against the tech pirates who won't let us speak. They'll say, Dan, the fight is here on Twitter and on YouTube. I don't disagree with you. I'm on Twitter and YouTube.
You're watching this, many of you on YouTube now. I'm not deleting my account. I'm not. Just to be crystal clear, I'm not asking you to do that either. Please understand. I get the sort of Dan, I'm not retreating. I am not asking you to retreat. I don't disagree with you at all. I post to Twitter all the time. My videos are on YouTube. I'm not leaving. I'm simply suggesting to you that it's only a matter of time before you're impacted by their policies to.
I've already been hurt by it. You need a social media home that's not going to do this. You need a home that's not going to throttle you for daring to bring up an alternative idea that makes people a little uncomfortable. That's the only reason I'm involved in parler and I bring it up, Paula gave me a great analogy this morning for the people who emailed me and I appreciate your opinions. I don't mean this is a knock. And they say, Dan, I'm not leaving.
I'm not asking you to leave. I'm simply telling you you really should establish a home base over at Parler. I don't have any financial interest, by the way, Bichard or other ones, but other video platforms, too, because one day you will be in space. Fight is coming to you on social media, too. And what are you going to do when Twitter tells you you're suspended? Paula said to me this morning, it's like, you know, it's like suggesting you go to a restaurant, the poisons you every day and you're like, I'm going to keep going back until I prove a point.
Clean this restaurant up. Good luck. There's a way to fight in a way not to, or someone tweeted to me this morning, ironically on Twitter when I posted about this, they said, this is like this. It's not quitting. It's setting up an alternative home because you're you're playing cards with someone with a Martek. They'll ban you, they will say they've already we're not allowed to run ads on Twitter, no one's ever explained to us why.
This show, I will take a big financial hit on this show today because I will undoubtedly be throttled. And when the numbers go down, we lose weight, which is fine, I'm not sure that this isn't some, like joke. I do it because I don't it's not about them. It's about the fight. It's not about the dinero, the dough, the money, the scratch, whatever you want to call it. It's about the fight.
I'm with you in it. If I wanted to forego the fight and forget about it, I can make a whole lot of extra money by letting it go. I'm interested in the fight. I'm here for you. I'm just suggesting to you we've established a home base for you. If you want to join, go right ahead. If you don't go. I'm not asking you to leave anything. I'm just telling you to be very careful because you're eating in a restaurant that's poisoning you every day and one of these days they're going to knock you off and he ain't going to be around to eat anymore.
You're playing cards with a guy with a marked deck you can't possibly win, and sooner or later your wallet is going to be empty. You're not going to have any money to bet anymore because you can't win a hand. They will ban you tomorrow if they can throttle the president of the United States, his tweets, and temporarily limit what his son tweets over a simple video about medical advice, you may or may not this you may or may not agree with.
You think you really believe you're safe there? The fight is there, but the bigger fight is setting up free market alternatives. All right, enough on that. I appreciate it. And I really mean it. I respect your opinions on it. And I agree with you. Don't retreat. That's what's frustrating is maybe why I hope I didn't come off the wrong way, but that's why my frustration is here, because I'm not. You're emailing me on something we totally agree about.
It's not adversarial. I'm not telling you to retreat. I'm just telling you, be safe. Be safe and set up somewhere where they're not going to come after you. All right. Moving on, speaking of coronavirus, you know, the misinformation out there is just absolutely stunning. I mean, we're being subjected now. Now, do you understand why? The flow of the the fight against bad information is good information and more information, and if you believe information conservatives are putting out is bad information and put out more information yourself.
I'm open to it. Ladies and gentlemen, you want to show me studies on chloroquine or Ramdas Xavier or whatever that are good or bad? I am open to it. I'm not I have no financial stake in these companies. I don't I don't I'm not like chloroquine fanatical. I just want to see the data. That's all I'm telling you. The data you're getting now about what's going on in many of these states by the media is outrageously off base.
I'm getting these calls constantly about this. There's a state of panic in Florida. It's like The Walking Dead officer Rick is around with the axe and the revolver. People are dying. Folks, do you want to see the actual data or do you want to listen to the media? Florida has a problem. It's largely isolated to South Florida, where we've had a pretty dramatic spike. It is now leveling off. But again, before I move on quickly, here's the data from the TSA dot com that tracks daily the number of deaths per hundred thousand people.
It'll be in the show, notes this exact link. If you want to go to just directly there, go to Ban China.com newsletter directly to the websites, the TSA dot com. Death rates from coronavirus in the United States as of July 27th by St.. Look who's at the top, New Jersey in New York with a staggering New Jersey now number one. One hundred and seventy eight deaths per 100000 people. That is a tragedy. New York is number two, one hundred sixty eight.
Now, for those you've been told by the media that New York is a success story, along with New Jersey run by far left liberal tyrant governors who jailed gym owners like the Attila's gym guy who dared to open his business. You've been told this is a huge success story, right? Conveniently, again, these states are run by liberals. Well, where's Florida again on this, which you've been told is a horror show, Walking Dead style. George Romero.
Zombies are out of the ground. Florida is dying. Everybody's dying in Florida. So you'd think they'd be close to New Jersey's one hundred and sixty one hundred seventy eight excuse me, deaths per hundred thousand people. I had to take two screenshots of the chart because that's how far down Florida is that this is chart two. Do you want to watch again? YouTube dot com slash Bongino, Florida. Twenty seven. 27 deaths per 100000 people. Twenty seven deaths, too many.
Obviously, these are human beings, these are not statistics we're talking about, we don't live in Stalinist Russia where they talk about people like their appendages to the state. But the data, again, ladies and gentlemen, matters. Remember the Turkey problem we talked about last week? Data matters, why does data matter? Data matters because we make decisions based on sound data that impact people's lives. If you're being told Florida, some hellhole, it has to shut down again, people are dying everywhere, decisions that will impact people's lives, their businesses, their kids education, shut down the schools, shut down everything.
We have to stop this. We need to be more like New York. New York is. Five times worse than we are. Almost six times for New Jersey. They're six times worse off than we are. Shouldn't the media be saying whatever happened in New York and New Jersey don't do that? But that's not what they're saying. Again, if you're not coming here and on other shows, Mark Levin Show and otherwise you're not getting the truth from anyone you really believe.
Florida is the apocalypse and New York and New Jersey, which lead the country by far. It's not even close in deaths per 100000 people are some kind of model of success we should emulate elsewhere. I don't. I don't know who told you that, and I'm very sorry that you're you know, you're not looking at the actual data and you're making decisions based on a false premise. But it's doing a lot of damage. All right, let me move on.
I want to get to those two stories, they weren't even in my house, so I have to flip back to page one. Those that wasn't even in my original plans for the show today, I had a whole different set up, ready to rock and roll. And last minute I saw this stuff and I wanted to get it out there because it's very fresh. I was a bit frustrated on Fox last night. Some of you saw my appearances.
If you watched me on Hannity tonight. I was very frustrated last night. I'm really sorry. I didn't mean to come off. So I came in, I was talking to my wife and I'm like that. I like man. She's like, Yeah, look, man, I'm just really frustrated. I called the media people more. I said, No, not morons. I'm being nice. They're actually imbeciles. And I was talking about how these media people who feed you misinformation about Florida and block information about treatments for for coronavirus because they don't like it.
Oh, no, we're not going to put that in. You're not allowed to hear that, that they're making a big mistake. They think we're living in a digital era. We're living in a digital era now, we're not living in the Walter Cronkite era, where if it wasn't discussed on CBS, NBC or ABC and Peter Jennings or David Brinkley didn't mention it, Joe, it didn't happen nationally. You remember that. You're a little older than I am now.
If Cronkite, Jennings Brinkley, Brokaw and others didn't talk about it 20, 30 years ago, 40 years ago, nationally, nobody talked about it. It didn't happen. If it wasn't on the front page of The New York Times, the old gray lady, nobody knew about it. All right, ladies and gentlemen, that era is over. It's listen to me. It's over. We live in a digital era. Everybody's got this the camera on their phone.
Everyone everyone's a reporter now. Videos go viral on Twitter is going to ban it. They'll find it elsewhere. It's on websites, search engines. They can't pull it down as fast as people can reload it and put it up. You can try to be Soviets. It's not working. This video about the doctors and and on the Capitol Hill briefing yesterday, they did went viral. It didn't matter. They pulled it down. People kept putting it back up.
It's those days are over, and that's why I was so mad last night, because it's it applies with the riots, too. They're not riots or peaceful protests, really. We're watching people burn the courthouse down and beat the crap out of cops. Do you missing that? Oh, you think because, you know, George Costanza on CNN didn't say it, that it doesn't exist. It's not what happened. All right, let me get to my second spot, because I want to there was a stunning interview with Valerie Jarrett, Valerie Jarrett.
Joe, she's back. Is Valerie Jarrett, Barack Obama's right hand woman. She's back. Why? She went on with Maria Bartiromo this morning, I have no idea. Maria Bartiromo on Fox is ten times smarter than Valerie Jarrett and Maria Bartiromo after lunch. But she went on and the videos are stunning. And I warned you this was going to happen. And I'll get to that and I'll get to the connection between the impeachment thing and Spygate. The name you're going to, I promise, is going to sound familiar to you also.
But to my friends, that liquid ivy. Hey, believe it or not, dehydration occurs daily in three out of four people.
No good, especially down here in Florida where it's super hot, where liquid ivy, you get the fastest, most efficient way to stay hydrated. Each serving helps you get as much hydration as two or three bottles of water. This is Paula's personal favorite. She will not run a workout without it down here.
We love it. Liquid Ivy. It tastes good to proper hydration can boost your immunity. One serving of liquid IV provides the same hydration as two or three bottles of water and as essential vitamins and more vitamin C than an orange as much potassium as a banana. It's healthier than their sugary sports drinks. It is no artificial flavors or preservatives, less sugar than an apple. It's made with clean ingredients. It's not GMO vegan, free gluten, dairy and soy.
Well, what makes liquid ivy so effective? Why does it work so well keeping those muscles in your body and everything super hydrated? It has cellular transport technology, the optimal ratio of glucose, sodium and potassium, which delivers water and nutrients into your bloodstream. My buddy, my doctor friend texted me the other day, said he just picked up the box of the stuff. It's a perfect balance. Keep you hydrated more effectively than water alone. One stick and 16 ounces of water can give you as much hydration as two or three bottles of plain water liquid.
If he's on a mission to change the world, they're donating two to three million servings in response to covid-19 products are being donated hospitals, first responders, food banks, veterans and active military. It's available nationwide at Costco and Target and get twenty five percent off when you go to liquid ivy dotcom and use promo code Bungeni with checkout. That's twenty five percent off. Anything you order when you use promo code. Mangino at liquid ivy dotcom get better hydration today at liquid ivy dotcom use promo code Bungeni.
You're going to love this stuff. We'll get that those dry lips anymore. I should have had one this morning. I'm actually a little thirsty right now.
Maybe we should take a break and I should go get one. Just kidding. We'd be very upset. We'd have to stop and start again because it's all kind of splicing problems with the show. All right. Let's get right through to Valerie Jarrett. So Maria Bartiromo show this morning. And I Joe Joe, please, as my check and balance on the show, we have separate branches of government here, the Paula branch, the Dan Branch, the the Drew branch.
And the job is like four separate branches here. Yeah, but I am the executive here. I am the the president of Bungeni. Did I not say a few years ago that the Democrats were going to drag out this whole Spygate thing, drip and drizzle. Bombshell's here in there. And why? Because they didn't want any kind of like big front page, splashy story. And then when it all comes out in drips and drizzles and the glass is full of the scandal, they're going to say, this is old news, man.
Why are you bringing this up, Joe? Did I not say that? You did say you remember that because where did they try this before Joe and Benghazi right now we found I mean, we all know the story about Benghazi. I mean, now what if you bring it up now, even on, like media outlets, cable news out there be like a big gozi? It is. That's old news. As if these four people who were heroically killed defending our special mission complex in Benghazi, as if they've been resurrected from the dead Lazarus style and there have been no consequences.
That's what they did with Benghazi. An email dripped out here, an email dripped out there. And over the course of two years, when we understood the full scope of the scandal, by the time you brought it up, they were like, that's old news. We're not talking about that anymore. I warned you they were going to do this with the Spygate scandal.
Here's Valerie Jarrett this morning. With the move on approach, check this out, do you believe if Jim Comey knew that the dossier was fake and garbage and he kept going re upping warrants to spy on the Trump campaign, that he should go to jail? Well, Maria, look, I have very high degree of confidence that our intelligence community investigators comported themselves responsibly. Look, Lindsey Graham is the one that encouraged Senator McCain to turn over the dossier in the first place to the FBI.
And so I can't tell you all of the reasons why Comey went forward with his investigation. Maybe this was one piece of a bigger puzzle. But I do know that it's nearly four years ago and I don't understand why our focus isn't on what's happening right now and today. That's the investigation I'd like to see.
But I told you. I told you, Joe, remember the Clinton impeachment, the same thing. Listen to me, ladies and gentlemen. The Democrats do this all the time. All the time. The Clinton impeachment, when they found out about her in the Oval Office with, you know, you know, the whole deal, trying to keep it somewhat family friendly when Clinton did is a little, you know. Remember what happened when the impeachment trial, what was started, what was the name of the website again that started to get where they said we don't need to move on, dog, you move on, dog.
You know, that's how that started, right? Move on, dog. That's how that started. Oh, you don't remember that they actually have a website. OK, it's time to move on. We don't need to be talking about Bill Clinton or her in the Oval Office. We don't need to be taught. We need to move on. You understand this is a deliberate tactical approach, they do every time you have them dead to rights, they do the same thing.
They leak slowly but surely, little Lego pieces, and then when you see that the Lego spells out blank, you you're like, oh my gosh, that's offensive. But you didn't see it because little pieces were added to create the aph and all that other stuff. And you didn't see it till years later and you didn't realize you were being insulted. They understand that they know they can't hide this stuff forever, just like the Clinton impeachment and the body bags in Benghazi.
They couldn't hide it because Monica had evidence, if you know what I mean. Mm hmm. Again, we're trying to keep this show somewhat family friendly. She had evidence. It's. In Benghazi, we had actual body bags and emails. The Democrats know this stuff is going to get out. So they drip an email here and an email there, they extend the timeline and by the time the public is forgotten, most of the details of the scandal like they try to do with Spygate hacks like Valerie Jarrett, tyrants.
Go on, Maria Bartiromo, go. This was four years ago. So what? We spied on a presidential candidate weaponized. The CIA and the FBI attacked the civil liberties of numerous Americans and spied on the United States in an attempt to remove him from office in a soft coup. It was four years ago. Maria, why are you focusing on little things like that MoveOn dog? That was the website. Look it up. That's how the website started.
This is their thing. I warned you about this. Our audience archive is Judy, who's the greatest ever. If you could find that show, we'd love you to death. If you could find the actual clip, I will play it on the show. I don't know when it was from. I'm very sorry, but she's good at this. She's like my library, like no one else. If you can find that clip, I never play clips of myself from the old days.
I'll play that clip where I told you they were going to do this. They do it every time. Now, here's a clip, too, from this where hack Valerie Jarrett, big police state her. Here's another lie, so lie number one is, don't worry, this is no big deal. Four years ago, lie number two is no, no, this one's this is beyond hilarity. You want to laugh, but it's a tragedy is going on.
This is Valerie Jarrett to this day, still insisting that Mueller's report found some wrongdoing. There were no criminal charges. And let me while you're listening, let me just preface this first by what they do here. This is another Democrat trick. Marie Harf does this on Fox all the time. She says there was a lot of evidence that there was some Trump nefarious activity with Russia. She doesn't understand what evidence is. I've used this example before. It's like me accusing Joe of robbing a bank.
I do a thorough investigation like Mueller did on Trump. We find out Joe did not rob the bank, the banks in Maryland and Joe was in China the day the bank was robbed. And yet I still point to the evidence in the report. Joe is an account holder at the bank. Three days earlier, Joe was taking video with the front door. Joe's Google Maps shows he drives by the bank every day, all, by the way, coincidences that not in and of themselves.
Joe just lives in a neighborhood. He was taking a photo with a bank because Joe had his new the son had his new uniform on. He went take a picture and the bank was in the background. It has nothing to do with a crime he didn't commit. This is what you understand. This is what they're doing with the Muller report saying Trump crossed paths with a Russian. At one point, Trump junior met with a Russian. Yeah, yeah, we know.
And we have the translator's account of the meeting who said nothing nefarious happening. Did you read that? You understand what you're doing? They're putting together separate, distinct data points. They're calling it evidence. It's not to prove a crime that didn't happen happen. Listen to Valerie Jarrett do this right now, talking about the Mueller report, which says the exact opposite of what she thinks it says checks. Is that a check?
So did President Obama direct any of this? That's not how it works. That's not how our investigations work, that we leave that to the intelligence community to bring forward information. And the dossier, I would imagine, would be one piece of a much bigger puzzle. And so what you're saying, is it important to make sure that there isn't influence? And actually, the Mitchell report didn't conclude that there wasn't any wrongdoing if that team was explicit in saying quite the opposite.
And so I don't think we should read in where I've been, actually. Any conclusions that you're making statements. And actually, just to be clear.
Just to be clear, Robert Mueller said no collusion, Michael Horowitz, the IG of the FBI, said that the dossier was, quote unquote, an essential piece of all of this investigating of the Trump campaign. Essential piece was the word Michael Horowitz used. So you say it was part of a larger mosaic. We have no evidence of that. We only have evidence of the dossier. But I really appreciate you coming on this morning and answering the tough questions that our audience certainly wants answers.
See, Bartiromo is terrific. And the mistake Valerie Jarrett made is she's going up against the far superior intellect that has an actual grasp of the facts. Valerie Jarrett, no, no, there's a larger mosaic of information we use to win after Trump to go after Trump. Really? Joe, where is it? Have you seen it? I'd like to know. Yeah. Yeah, well, me too. Thank you. Me too. Me and Joe are of like minds here.
Paul, would you like to see it? We're getting a nod from Paula to. One of these days, we'll get a mic for Paula and we're not being cheap, I swear, she just she's back and forth on the whole Mike thing. So, Paula Drew, you'll watch this show if you can just text me after the show. Have you seen the additional evidence they had on Trump outside of the dossier? Let me answer for, you know, can I have a thank you?
Because I know that's what he's going to say. So we're now four four four. You understand Democrats get to say whatever they want, nobody challenged them, and then they go on a show with a really brilliant hosts like Maria who because really there's a larger mosaic because nobody's actually seen that. And then she brings up the hilarious. Well, the Muller report didn't exactly say there was no wrongdoing. No, that's exactly what it said. Mueller was charged with investigating criminal wrongdoing, Joe.
Not moral high crimes and misdemeanors right now, but was Mueller, the Bismullah, the high priestess of the of a high priest of new some new religion where they asked him to investigate moral crimes? Donald Trump, we think, in his head like Putin and he shouldn't have. That's not what any of this was about. It was a criminal investigation for criminal wrongdoing, which Mueller conclusively, despite a corrupt hack group of investigators who hated Donald Trump and were politically motivated to take him down, still couldn't find anything wrong.
And, of course, Valerie Jarrett, known liar, police later has to go on a national show on Fox Business and say otherwise because she's a liar and that's what liars do. They lie. Now, here's the second block of this is the block of this specific segment here. Why are they taking now the move on approach? Well, one, because they do it all the time, because Democrats do evil, awful things. And when they're caught, they use the media to say, look at these Republicans trotting out these old guys, it's time to move on.
That's number one. But they want to move on now and they're desperate to move on because as the information trickles out, which it shouldn't. And that's why, by the way, Christopher Wray at the FBI is a total disaster. Christopher Wray, the FBI knows the trickle theory. And instead of just letting us see the information and just pulling the Band-Aid off, he is part and parcel to this whole move on tactical approach. I hope you all understand that, right.
The director of the FBI is not on the side of of honesty, transparency, truth or justice. If you believe that, I'm very sorry. Why move on? Because they're terrified of what's really going to come out and every day we've done a good job exposing that. Yesterday, we brought up the connections again between spying scandal, the impeachment scandal and what's going on now. They're all the same thing, folks. Understand this top level. The Democrats hated Trump, they weaponized the government to spy on him when the spying operation did not keep him from winning the election, they moved on to appointing Bob Mueller.
Now, you may say to investigate what they knew collusion was a hoax, Bob Mueller wasn't investigating anything. They knew collusion was a hoax from the start. The whole goal of moving from step one spygate the spying scandal to Mueller was to get Trump to Masser toy with the Mueller team so that Mueller could charge him with obstruction of justice that was swept through. None of that worked either. Mueller was forced to conclude an investigation he knew was a phony from the start, you understand?
And when that didn't work, they moved on to impeachment. Using another hoax that there was some quid pro quo in a phone call didn't happen. Ladies and gentlemen, it's the same players. Let's prove it right now. Let's go to Red State piece number one, a terrific one by one of my favorite, I would call the new writer. I just haven't seen much of him before. But I'm really quickly falling in love with his content rights under the.
NOM de plume, shipwrecked crew, apparently a former FBI or Justice Department official, but writes in red state, this article's terrific. Again, go to Bon China.com slash newsletter, subscribe to my show notes, will email you these articles every day. Read this. It's a good one. FBI interview of Christopher Steele's primary sub sauce was to prepare him to work directly with CROSSFIRE hurricane team, huh? What? That's the headline in and of itself, slurries.
So the FBI figures out this dossier's garbage. They go right to the source of the dossier who says, hey, I got the information from another source, and instead of just verifying it's garbage, like, hey, you want to work directly with us. So but that's that's for another day. This is more about the connections between Spygate, the Mueller probe and impeachment. Check this out, so the guy, the Department of Justice official, the lawyer, David Laufman, right, who is at this interview with Steele's source, his big source was giving them all the tape and other stuff.
Or I may be clear. Steele says he's getting it from this guy. He's not. Steele is making this up. I just want to be clear, because I've been go back and forth with my buddy. Stephen McIntyre is a great Twitter account. I don't want to admit any way misconstrues Steele. The dossier is made up. Svetlana Likova knows that a bunch of great Twitter researchers know what the dossier is made up. It's fake. It's fake information attributed to real people.
We clear. OK, good, I see you nodding your head, because I don't want anyone to misconstrue what I'm saying. It's it. This source, Steele said, was his source. It's all made up. He said he got it from him. Steele made it up. But they do interview at some point, this guy who still says he got the information from. And it's interesting because this Department of Justice attorney shows up this guy by the name of David Laufman, why is Laufman there?
He's the DOJ attorney who has left and work for. Keep in mind, folks, Laufman has to know this is all garbage at this point. Why does he show up with the FBI for a proffer, a. Now what's a proffer? I don't want to talk jargon. A proffer is what we use. He calls it a queen for a day deal in the article. We call it a king for a day deal. It's not misogynistic. It's just that's just what it was.
We call that a king for a debut. If I catch Joe Armacost in a bank robbery scandal and he has co-conspirators, I need information on. Sometimes when you're a federal agent, you'll do a proffer king for a day deal. You bring Joe in with his lawyer. And the deal is this. You're the king for a day, Joe. Whatever you say to us in this proffer session, this interview, we will not use it against you in a subsequent trial unless you lie to us.
It happens all the time, I've done tons of them when I was a Secret Service agent. If he lies or she lies in the meeting, then we can use it against them, they're good. These King Friday deals. Why? Because the defendant's lawyer becomes your best friend, because the lawyers typically nudging him. Go and don't tell them the truth. They're going to use it against you, right? You get what I'm saying. That's why we use him.
This guy, the sub source, was brought in for a proffer. Why was he brought in for a proper. This is really weird. Look who's there at the meeting, so let's go to this piece by Chip Shipwrecked crew. Again, I'm really starting to think his work there. He says, I'm also curious about Loudon's presence in the prophet. Why him? He says the reliability of the source and the verification of his information was a key issue in the ongoing Carter Page Fizer that was supervised and approved by the Office of Intel, the National Security Division.
Why wasn't the Office of Intel chief attending the meeting? Was it to contain the information, keep this up as sign here, in other words, folks, were they really concerned that this guy was going to come out and say, hey, this whole dossier's garbage, I didn't steal any of this?
He goes on. Laufman, the lawyer, is a partisan Democrat loyalist. He's made that clear since he left government. That's a question Mary McCord should answer, since she was the acting assistant attorney general for the national security division at the time. And it would have been her decision, assuming she made it to have Laufman in Iraq with Dan Chanko, the primary source and his attorney, and then attend the FBI interview. All right. That's a lot.
That's a lie. Yes, it is. What does that mean? Question number one. Why was a Democrat Party loyal to loyalists, we now know Loughman working in the DOJ. Why was he there? And who sent them? Was he there to screen what this source was going to say? To make sure what he said got back basically to people in the Spygate plot, hey, guys, we're in trouble. I was in this interview with the source for Steele and he said it's all B.S. Keep in mind, what's in that proffer, supposed to generally stay in that proffer.
Generally speaking. Was he there more as kind of an eyes and ears show, if you know what I mean, than actually as a lawyer representing the Justice Department's interest? And who is this boss again? Mary McCord, who we would assume had to know about this, that he was going to talk to this big source for steel about pretape stuff and Russian collusion, right, Joe? Huge interview, January of twenty seventeen. Mary Macourt. I don't know why didn't she send him.
Why didn't she go. Well, Rosemary Macourt. Let's go to this piece for the Epic Times and be in the show notes from earlier in the year, but it's worth rereading again. Intel watchdog who vetted whistleblower complaint tied to top lawyer and Democrat impeachment effort. What now? I'm really confused. So Mary McCord, DOJ supervisor, sends David Laufman, a Democrat Party loyalist, to sit in on an interview with the guy who supposedly was the source for the dossier.
Who's Mary McCord from this Epic Times piece? Well, this is interesting. Prior to his confirmation as the intelligence community, Inspector General Michael Atkinson served as the senior counsel to Mary Macourt. Well, who was Michael Atkinson who worked for McCord to? He was the assistant attorney general at the Department of Justice, according to a questionnaire Atkinson submitted to the Senate committee. McCord, who left their post in May of twenty seventeen, now serves as the legal director at the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection Issues, a law professor at Georgetown University.
And she's also listed as the top outside attorney for the House Democrats in the legal fights tied to impeachment. Six. So just to be clear, so we can tie this up. What did I tell you? I told you that Spygate, the Mueller probe and the impeachment probe were all one continuation of the same scandal, the scandal to get Trump out of office when one didn't work Spygate. They jumped to Mueller and Mueller didn't work. They went through impeachment was all the same players.
So you're telling me the guy. Laufman, who shows up at a meeting with Steeles PPY tape source. That guy works for Mary McCord, Mary McCord, who was the boss of the inspector general who approved the fake whistleblower complaint against Trump, which started the impeachment scandal. Backorders Atkinsons boss and Macourt is also the boss of the lawyer, the Democrat hack lawyer she sent to the proffer session, which deals primary subsidies in January. And then McCord conveniently leaves after that and becomes one of the attorney advisors to Adam Schiff during the impeachment trial.
Ladies and gentlemen, as I've repeatedly over and over said to you again and again, they all know each other, they're all connected. This was all one big giant, Charlie Foxtrot. Which I lay out in my next book, which you're going to love. All right, let me get to my final sponsor, and I got some I got some Antifa stuff, a video I really wanted to get through yesterday, and they're interesting change in propaganda.
It's a wall of vets now, a wall of vets with antifa. It's the wall of vets. As if like because you claim to be a veteran. Some of them are some of them aren't. At the Antifa wall of vets. If you claim to be a veteran, you can now join a racist fascist terror group. And don't worry, it's a wall event. I'm going to talk about that propaganda thing in a minute, how we're not falling for that for a second final sponsored by our friends at my Patriots supply lists.
And every day we aren't just witnessing the spread of the coronavirus. We're seeing the spread of fear. The markets are very volatile. Demand for basic necessities as we've seen. We don't need to be told that it's gone through the roof. We've had meat disappearing in certain places. Listen, scary stuff. Be prepared. Be prepared. You don't have to be anxious about anything. Just be prepared. According to my Patriots spy, they have some older customers with health conditions that don't want to go out and they've actually been living off their emergency food supply.
Others are under self quarantine. Some don't want to face the mob for a loaf of bread. Go to prepare with Dan Dotcom today. Don't wait to ensure your food supply. Reserve your two or four week emergency food kit today. Don't wait. These bills include breakfasts, lunches and dinners. They last up to 25 years in storage. So you are prepared. My Patriots supply has been a trusted partner for years, they've been working around the clock clock to keep up with your orders.
The current weight is eight to 12 weeks because demand has been through the roof at 80 times normal. I got mine. I got another order coming in. Sir, we have no idea how long this crisis will last. It's important to be self-reliant. It's not too late. Go to prepare with the end dotcom and ensure your food supply today. Don't wait. Prepare with the end outcome. Prepare within dotcom. OK, so I wanted to get to this yesterday, but it's been such a loaded show, so much going on, we got Barres testimony today, which of course we'll cover.
We'll give you a full, full scope on what happened there tomorrow. So don't you worry about that. But the riots in Portland, the riots, you know, a peaceful protest, you can take that elsewhere, please, please stop the nonsense. Let us know how to peacefully protest. They're a racist fascist terror group that likes to attack innocent men, women and children. They're an anti First Amendment activist group. That's all they are. So if you want to propagandize people, you can take that stuff elsewhere.
I'm not interested. So here's just a quick video for those of you watching on YouTube. As you listen. This is Antifa, you know, the peaceful, as they call themselves, antifascist. They're actually I like to call them pro Tifa. I know it should be pro, but I like protest far better. I call them pro or prote for pro. They're pro fascist and that's what they do. Here's the lovely little tyrant that anti antifa shining, blinding, high powered lasers into the eyeballs of federal agents are blinding them.
And you have to wonder where the money's coming from with Prote far right.
Where are they getting the money from? Oh, there you go. High powered lasers right up to the eyeballs, blinding federally. But don't worry, Joe, they're antifa says they're fighting fascism. They're fighting fascism. Check that video out. YouTube, dotcom, Panjim, they do this every night. High powered lasers, eyeballs blinding, we have federal agents who will not recover some of their sight from this, who had lasers sewn into their eyeballs. Where's the money coming from?
What about for the sors they're using to cut down the fences in their peaceful protests? The media defends him, why? Because as I've told you repeatedly, the media, you know, liberals, liberals, media, same thing, the activists, they need shock troops. They've always had shock troops, big government tyrants, otherwise known as liberals and pro Tifa. They have always had shock troops on the front lines to do their dirty work. To create chaos and fear, chaos and fear due to things, chaos, when it's a Republican administration creates the perception that the country is out of control under Donald Trump.
So they love the chaos and that's why the media, the liberal media supports it. Yeah, but then people could be hurt. Folks, please stop, they don't care about that. You actually think they care about people getting hurt? I'm sorry if you've been. Misled to believe liberal media folks actually care about federal aid is getting hurt. I'm very sorry. That is a fallacy. They don't care. They also need these shock troops on the front line for fear they need to scare people, they need to frighten you into submission.
I'm not kidding. They're hoping you won't speak out. They're helping with their tech Tyran buddies, suppressing speech that any alternative thought on anything will be wiped from the airwaves and anyone who dares to speak out otherwise in circumvention of the tech tyrants will be so scared because antifa pro Tifa will show up at your house. Again, I know it's pro, but I prefer Tifa, I like Prote pro fascist group. That's it. That's what they are. They're the biggest pro fascist group in the United States right now.
Now, Jerry Nadler, you may have seen this and I'm a day late on this, I'm sorry, but the great flex we love Flex Flex talks on social media. He's terrific. A flex court. He does. He's a man. On the street interviews, he caught up with the hapless Jerry Nadler. And Nadler had this to say and began. We thought this show has been largely about strategy, the let's move on strategy. Notice the move on strategy here handled a different way with Jerry Nadler, hack Democrat from New York.
Nadler's asked about the violence, we've all seen the laser videos, I've shown the sores, the beatings on police officers and stuff, and here's Nadler's response again, taken the move on approach. Check this out.
It is true, there's violence across the whole country. Details about the incident that's happening in Portland right now. But that's a myth that's being spread only in Washington, D.C., L.A. and Portland. Yes, it's there. There's there's videos everywhere online. There's fires and riots. There's throwing fireworks at federal officers. DHS is there. Look online. It gets crazy, Mr. Tyler. Thinks it's fake news is a myth, is a myth in Portland. Meanwhile, the whole city is on fire and they're trying to bring down the courthouse.
Tipped the great flat. Guess who we love on this show? Affleck, as he always gets the best man on the street interviews. So give us a myth, folks.
Judge, you know that it's all a myth we made out and it's all fabricated videos. Doctored. Move on, move on. There's nothing to see here. You see a Joe, you get the connection, right? That was the reason I discussed both stories today. Yeah, it was great. Yeah. This is how they do it, and it's all a myth, stop promoting conspiracy theories, that was so last night when that cop got blinded.
That was so seven hours ago. He'll recover his vision like never. Don't worry about it. This is the Democrats, these are sick, evil people, you understand that, right? This side on a very serious note, I had a friend that I'm obviously not going to disclose who because they don't give me permission to do so. But a very influential one who called me the other day. Folks literally, not figuratively, in tears at the status of this country right now.
Marketing. Paula was in the car with me. A very influential person, absolutely in tears at how bad of a situation we are looking at. These are not political fights anymore, they appear as such, these are seriously moral and ethical fights for our future, that if we lose, I can't I I don't know what's going to happen. Now, I don't want to ever leave you depressed, I said to this individual what I'll say to you now.
Sometimes we need to hit the bottom, the dregs of the barrel before we realize how bad it is and rebound, but we always have. I lived through it in New York. I've seen it where the city. It took a while. I'm not going to lie to you. It may not turn around overnight, but it always does. I watched the city descend into total madness, crime everywhere. You were not safe and even the good neighborhoods.
And eventually people got tired of it, elected Rudy Giuliani and the city turned around. I am convinced that's going to happen here, call me an optimist, whatever, say I'm out of time. I don't care. I just don't believe where I don't believe it. I believe this country has really been blessed by God and that maybe sometimes we just need a bad wake up call. How long that wake up call is going to last? I don't know how many are going to have to die.
I don't know. But I believe the combination of the tech tyranny, the street violence, the criminality left this with no moral compass at all and a general hatred to the United States that that witch's brew can't possibly can't possibly go on. You can't tell me that half the country is going to support that agenda. You just can't infanticide other the other stuff. Open borders that. Now, that's not. That's when people that's not who we know, that's legitimately not who we are as who the loser classes and that's not us.
Again, call me an optimist, call me out of touch. That's fine. I'm not going to I'm going down with the ship. I said a prayer last night. I encourage you to as well. If you're a man or woman of faith or not. Doesn't even matter. I said, God, let me fight this fight to the end, I'm not kidding because I sometimes get frustrated too. But let me fight this fight to the end.
Told my take my last breath of oxygen. Generations before us have had a lot tougher fights than us. Stay in it, so there's an article up at Bismack on exactly this. I want you to be very careful about pro Tifa. You know, the pro fascist terror group. They're experts at propaganda. They are. And they they're financed by people who understand propaganda. So this is an article of Bismack it talking about me, but I don't put it up for that reason.
As Bunshiro stands up, the so-called wall of that said riots, being a vet doesn't absolve you for supporting racist fascist antifa. I said that and they covered it a piece and I'll say it again now. What they're doing now is they're realizing that they're engaged in a long term propaganda war. Propaganda, an effort to instill false ideas into the public to garner public support on your side. Joe, why are they losing that propaganda war antifa? Let me just pose a question to you in a different form.
Do you think it works well, Joe, for the sane crowd? I'm not talking about the leftist lunatic liberals, but I mean, sane people, you know, Democrats, mainstream Democrats, even maybe mainstream Republicans who may not like the president. I'm talking about you're saying people have different political ideas. Do you think a good strategy to get them to support your protest for cause is to have videos out there of you dressed in ninja garb, lasering the eyeballs of federal agents while burning down and graffiti on the federal courthouse and attacking innocent men, women and children on the streets?
You think that's an effect? Thank you very, very much. Joe Johns, Joe Johns. As we say, it's not good. He's very bad. Goes right to the bottom, could very bad. Thank you for a moment of clarity by Armacost, which we always need. Very bad. Joe's right, of course, as he always is. So what's happening here? So protein far knows that beating the out of people and doing it on camera impacts is probably not a good idea.
So now they brought out Joe, the wall of vets, the wall of vets, the wall of vets was buttressed by the wall of bombs and the wall of that. Ladies and gentlemen, let me a message to the wall of vets. I say vets, because some of the people in there, I'm sure, are not vets. Those who are vets, you get nothing. You will find no quarter from us for supporting a racist fascist terror group that blinds law enforcement officers with high powered lasers, destroys public property it doesn't own, threatens people.
It will docsis innocent people and attacks men, women and children whenever they feel like it impacts and fires at them. In some cases, wind farms, you get nothing. Your service gets you nothing. Zero. You understand that if you were appealing to, like we'll say, we're vets and everybody else where you got the wrong crew because don't think for a second where this stupid. That same logic applies to the wall of moms, moms, by the way, and some of them, by the way, who were the same women there the night before, who just changed shirts, said, I'm the wall of moms now or the wall of dads.
That gets you nothing. And by the way, the same exact logic applies. To anyone with any political ideology, in other words, Joe. You don't get to claim I'm a vet, I'm a mom, I'm a dad, and I've decided to join al-Qaida, but I'm a vet. The Wall of vets for Al. No, no, it doesn't work that we know as a terror group. That's what they are. You get nothing. You will get nothing from me or anyone listening to the show, whatever propaganda you think you're doing, will be immediately discredited by me every day.
And we have an audience big enough to expose it, a wall of moms. So I say to the wall of moms, vets and dads. Why do you support a racist group of fascist terrorists like Rotifer? No, they're not racists, really. Here's an interesting piece by The Washington Examiner is fascinating about pro Tifa. Here's a quote. So DHS agents in Portland by Paul Bedard protesters seek to embarrass and defeat Trump and they are catatonic with hate.
They're talking about protein from the.
So here's a little quote from the lovely little tyrants at Rotifer. These racist if gosh, it's hard to not curse on the show. Talking about Protea. So what are the agents there added? This is a quote from one of the federal agents on the ground. Quote, I'm seeing African-American Federal Protective Service inspectors, 20 year law enforcement officers being called the N-word to their face for the first time in their careers. By scrawny, pasty white booger eating communist blank heads.
Because we're on radio. That's a pretty great description of pretty far snuggies wearing. Yeah, hostess cupcake eating in your basement, Hot Pockets dwelling. Eighteen year old slobs with no education, no job and no meaning to their lives, who walk up to black federal agents and drop the bomb on them. Why? Because it's antifa. It's a racist fascist terror group. The wall of vets, you get nothing. You get nothing, you join this group, you are a racist.
Do you support this? You support this calling a dedicated Federal Protective Service officers who happen to be black. You drop you support dropping bombs on them. I'm just checking out our group. No, no, it's your group, Rotifer. With the wall of vets, though. You went to wall of morons who you really with and the wall of racists and fascists. You get nothing. All right, on a lighter note, I mentioned this story yesterday.
Hold your horses on this one. That was my mother. Remember that people don't say that anymore when we were younger. That was a thing. The horse. My mother. Hold your horses, kids, your horses. I mentioned this yesterday. I saw this and I was like this camp. I can't believe this story. Outside of Tucker's show on Fox. I have not heard this story anywhere. So apparently there's some people who used to work with government entities on a UFO project who came out with some pretty stunning information that Joe is magically I'm not suggesting there's any conspiracy like David the Coveny Gillian Anderson style here, but I think the media cycle is so heavy, like how a story like this got lost.
I'm just unsure. Let's go right to this is from New York. Mag again, story up in the show notes. Check it out. This is not a joke, the Babylon B. This is by an Adam Cramond. The Pentagon has reportedly found off world vehicles not made on this earth. Oh, we're coming in. Where were they made? I saw this yesterday where exactly where were they made? They're not made on this earth. Is there another earth or another?
Where were they made? That's kind of a bold statement. No, you bet, brother. I haven't heard it. I brought this up. The only reason yesterday I didn't get to it is probably two minutes before I went on the air. It popped on my parlor feed there. And I said, wait, I'm reading this like, is this the onion? From the piece, I'm not kidding, this is this is real stuff. So in March, an astrophysicist, Eric Davis, who spent years working as a consultant for the Pentagon's UFO program and is now a defense contractor.
He gave a classified briefing to the Defense Department on what he called off world vehicles not made on this earth, in other words, spaceships. I could watch you watch that show like that. Yeah, I still love that show. Why? You know, that's from. If you like, I'm not a good with Joe is a whisler, Joe plays harmonica, Joe, I'm the terrible. I still can't do that thing with all, but that's the best X Files I can.
So great. A guy gave up. What was the briefing about exactly? Off world vehicles I made on the shirt. Like, I think we should see that briefing. No. What kind of vehicles? Like a Shelby Mustang or what are we talking about here? We think about like flying off Jayanthi wheelbase. Objects hover have like all those little like remember those little hover boards that every parent tried to get on. It nearly smashed their skulls on.
Remember those that were popular a few Christmases ago? Yeah, I made that mistake. You nearly ripped my hamstring out. There's more from this article is fascinating. Now, the reason this snippet from the article is interesting is remember Harry Reid, Democrat hack, former Senate Majority Leader, Minority Leader Harry Reid was a powerful man in Congress and he was a senator from the great, great state of Nevada. You know where a lot of this stuff is alleged to have been found?
He had a comment on this. So let me just this is let me just read this. So this is from this piece again. So The Times reports, quote, among a small group of former government officials and scientists with security clearances who without presenting physical proof, that's important.
So they didn't have any physical stuff there. But they say they are convinced that objects of undetermined origin have crashed on Earth with materials retrieved for study. What the heck is this? It goes on. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is quoted in the article, too, but his comments are hedged. The typical politician style, according to Time's Harry Reid, this guy was a very powerful Democrat. Folks said, quote, He believe that crashes of objects of unknown origin may have occurred.
And that any recovered material should be studied. Wow, kind of a fascinating hej, right, Joe. Yeah. Maeva that have do you think we should know about that may like that. Makes kind of a big word. Right. Kind of like the briefing of the unknown objects not built on Earth, as Joe said, like OK, where were they built then built. Where do you have any ideas. Jupiter was it. They got some moon base.
Like where do we have do we have a base on Saturn were unaware of are we sitting on the rings, you know, pumping out the latest F one fifty Raptor? I mean, I'd like to know exactly where exactly that happened in some alternate universe. Is this like at Astra, you know, crazy space baboon's you guys where exactly they built this stuff? Read this story, it's not even a long article. No, it's up in my show notes today.
Again, it's a left wing rag, but the article is not partisan. And in the case of Harry Reid, who was a disaster, it's interesting to note that he said this and couched it in conditionals like, well, there may be recovered objects in space, but you really.
You see that stuff? My experience with politicians is they don't say things like that unless they have a reason to hedge your comments and a good one. Strange stuff, folks, strange stuff. All right, I had some other stories I wanted to get to this Trump thing on school choice, I, I have to get to it tomorrow. It is an important story, though. I got that. I've got a Supreme Court case, too.
John Roberts fouls us again. No John Roberts now. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Dunwood Roberts, please don't ever on this show suggest to me again or email me, we have a conservative Supreme Court that we don't we have a liberal. There's no swing vote anymore. John Roberts is fully liberal. Now, I'll try to get to that tomorrow. We will get to it at some point this week. I just keep pushing stuff off because it's so much going on and I will get to Barr tomorrow as well.
All right, folks, thanks again for tuning in. Please subscribe to my podcast on YouTube, YouTube, dotcom slash Bongino and follow me on Parler and Twitter. Again, I'm not telling you to retreat. I'm telling you to be tactically smart and establish a home base where you will not be under attack and you won't have to play a card game with someone with a marked deck. I'm at the bar Jeno on those platforms. Check them out. Thanks for all your support.
Thanks for understanding. And my deep apologies if I came off a little frustrated in beginning. I just want to fight the fight and win. That's it. Talk is cheap to do matters. I'll see you tomorrow.
You just heard Dan Bongino.