Businesses all over the world right now are trying to reinvent how they connect with the world, whether you're delivering packages, treating patients or running a global customer support center, your customers need you to invent new ways to stay connected. Twilio is the platform that millions of developers trust to build seamless communications experiences with phone calls, text messages, video calls and more. Whatever your use case, Twilio has your back. It's time to build. Visit Twilio Dotcom.

To learn more, The Rachel Maddow Show weeknights at nine Eastern on MSNBC.

Let's let's just jump right in. There's a few things that are coming together in the news right now that are connected to each other. And I think it's worth sort of being clear about the picture that is emerging from those stories that are all emerging in the news right now. I will also tell you that the bottom line when you get to it is pretty unsettling, but all the more reason to take it seriously and to look at it clearly. So let's just start straight in.

First of all, you may have seen today that the odd, very odd Trump campaign guy, the old Roger Stone protege, the guy who worked for Paul Manafort in Russia when Manafort was servicing Russian oligarchs close to the Kremlin, this very odd duck who has turned up in all sorts of weird, fringy ways in the Trump universe for years, Michael Caputo, the man who the Trump administration put in charge of the CDC, the Trump administration installed him as the stop top spokesman at the Health and Human Services Department.

He then took it upon himself to try to block the CDC from publishing its scientific reports on covid. He and some guy who he appointed to be his scientific adviser, even though he was just a spokesman, came in and said that they were overruling the entire CDC. They actually successfully got CDC to change wording and some of their scientific reports. They forced delays of other CDC studies about coronavirus, which Michael Caputo decided he didn't like. And so they got held back for weeks.

You may have seen today that Michael Caputo today is out. He announced that he is taking a leave of absence after the publication last night by Yahoo! News of a Facebook live video from this past weekend in which Michael Caputo seemed to be going kind of nuts talking about how hit squads were coming to get him. And everybody needs to buy ammunition. And there are assassination drills happening all over the country and he's sure they're all coming for him. And he was scared of the long shadows you could see on the ceiling of his apartment.

That was first reported by The New York Times. It was first published last night, last night by Yahoo! News. And now today, Michael Caputo is gone. He says he is taking a 60 day leave of absence. The election is in forty eight days. We'll see if Michael Kaputa comes back 12 days after that. But when Michael Caputo's leave of absence was announced, Health and Human Services also announced that his so-called science adviser, the guy who was literally writing to the CDC, demanding that he and only he could decide what would be published.

A scientific findings. Michael Caputo's science adviser is not taking a leave of absence like puto. He has actually been fired or at least let go from Health and Human Services. Whether or not Michael Caputo ever comes back and is a little weird that a spokesperson had hired his own scientific adviser anyway. Right. He's the spokesperson for a scientific agency. You don't need your own scientific adviser to tell you about the science when you are supposed to be the spokesperson for an agency full of scientists.

It was weird from the outset. I mean, it wasn't clear also who this guy was, who Michael Caputo had hired to work with him to overrule the entire Centers for Disease Control during an epidemic that has already cost two hundred thousand lives. The man had been described in press reports as an assistant professor at a college in Canada late yesterday that fell apart two or sort of the college in Canada put out a public statement pointing out that the man who was working as Michael Caputo scientific adviser doesn't actually work at that college.

He did have an assistant professor contract gig a while back, but he doesn't teach there now. He does not speak for the university. And the university was like, did we mention the dude doesn't even work here, stop associating him with us. So that's happened within the past twenty four hours and that that is becoming a little bit of a theme because around the same time that the White House installed nut ball, Michael Caputo to go become the spokesperson for the health part of the US government, even though he has no background in health whatsoever.

And he picked up this random, unemployed, low level academic from Canada to become the new voice of scientific authority for the US government on covid overruling all the scientists of the CDC. Around the same time, the White House was installing this clown show atop the Centers for Disease Control. They were also bringing this guy on board at the White House itself, reportedly because the president likes seeing him on the Fox News Channel. He is not an infectious disease doctor or an epidemiologist or any kind of expert or scholar or even a trained person in any kind of public health.

He is a doctor. He's a radiologist specifically. He specializes in taking MRI's of people's heads. But in March of this year, as the epidemic was taking off in this country and starting to kill Americans by the boatload, in March, this conservative radiologist started publishing op ads like this one in right wing newspapers where he said there's no reason really to worry all that much about coronavirus. He said in March that it was only likely to kill about ten thousand people total in the US before it was gone.

And really, who cares about that? Compare that to the flu. Well, tens of thousands more deaths down the road, the same Dr. Scott Atlus built himself into a TV pundit, arguing improbably but insistently that the more Americans get infected by covid, the better. We like the fact that there's a lot of cases, that's exactly how we're going to get herd immunity, population immunity, these people getting the infection is not really a problem.

And in fact, as as we said months ago, when you isolate everyone, including all the healthy people, you're prolonging the problem because you're preventing population immunity. Low risk groups getting the infection is not a problem. In fact, it's a it's a positive.

This total isolation policy prevents broad population immunity. There is really no risk to young people. It doesn't matter if children get the disease. It's actually good news that the virus spreads widely because that means that we have a better chance of developing population immunity. It's fantastic news that we have a lot of cases.

It's fantastic news that we have a lot of cases. That's what we're going for. It's good news if the virus spreads widely, that's exactly how we're going to get herd immunity. The more infections, the better. So the White House, these things come together, right? The White House puts Michael Caputo and his nonworking assistant professor friend from Canada to control what the CDC is allowed to publish in terms of science about covid. And at the White House, they installed this guy from Fox News to tell the president what national policy should be uncovered.

President sees him on Fox News likes what he's saying, brings him into the White House to advocate it there and to make national policy. And now simultaneously, just as that college in Canada is letting us know that Michael Caputo's science adviser doesn't work there and he should stop telling people that he does. Now, simultaneously, we've got Stanford Medical School faculty publishing an open letter, letting the country know that no matter how much President Trump loves to describe this guy, Scott Atlas, as a Stanford doctor, he hasn't actually worked at Stanford Medical School in years.

And by the way, his former colleagues there think that at least on this subject, he's kind of a quack. Dear colleagues, as infectious disease physicians and researchers, microbiologists and immunologists and epidemiologists, we have both a moral and ethical responsibility to call attention to the falsehoods and misrepresentations of science recently fostered by Dr. Scott Atlus, a former Stanford Medical School colleague. Many of his opinions and statements run counter to established science. The dozens of undersigned Stanford faculty members point out that the use of face masks and social distancing and other public health measures have been shown to reduce the spread of covid, even though Scott Atlas has, by and large, denounced them.

They point out that asymptomatic people, including kids, can transmit it to others, despite the fact that Scott Atlas has said that's not true. They point out that kids themselves can get infected with serious consequences for themselves, despite the fact that Scott Atlas denies that, too. And then here's the please pay attention part of what his former colleagues are warning about him. They say, quote, Encouraging herd immunity through unchecked community transmission is not a safe public health strategy.

In fact, this approach would cause a significant increase in preventable cases, suffering and deaths. In other words. Oh, my God, how is it this possible how is it possible that this guy is in the White House? He's a quack on this stuff. He is advocating stuff that is totally contrary to established science and that is very dangerous. He's at the White House using his Stanford credentials to try to shine up his reputation here. And the president's bragging on that all the time.

I mean, so warned Scott Atlas's former colleagues from the medical school from which he is no longer affiliated and where, by the way, he was a radiologist anyway, not somebody who actually worked on infectious diseases before the White House plucked him from obscurity, slash Fox News to bring him into the White House to run the response to an infectious disease epidemic, something on which he has zero expertise. So these things are coming together in the news, right, Caputo today is out as the Trump guy riding herd on the CDC.

His so-called science adviser has been now exposed by the academic institution he tried to associate himself with. Meanwhile, the White House top covid doctor is also exposed by his former colleagues at the institution the White House has tried to associate him with. But this isn't a personal story. What this is about now, thanks to the president being unable to contain himself and having to say everything that crosses his mind all the time, the moment it first occurs to him.

This is not a personal story. What this is now is a window into what guys like this have actually done to the country. Because the Trump White House and the president personally has brought in these way out of left field substitute experts to replace the real experts. And to control what's said by the government, what scientific data gets out from the government and the way the White House leads policy on the pandemic, what has been the effect of them doing that?

Well, here's the other piece of this today, there's this. From Congressman Jim Clyburn, who runs the select committee set up in the House to run oversight on the coronavirus crisis today, Cliburn's committee told the White House that they need to start publicly releasing their advice to individual states about how to handle the pandemic at the state level, because the White House has been advising individual states for a couple of months now. But while the White House has tried to keep those documents secret, some of them have leaked to the press.

Some of them have now been obtained by the committee. The committee has now made them public. And what they found is nut ball. And again, this isn't wrong person being charge of the policy. This isn't a person who shouldn't be anywhere near the levers of policy miraculously getting hired. And how did that happen? How did that slip through the cracks?

This is actually what we're doing. See if you can see what went wrong here, see if you can see the impact at work, the impact on our country of the Trump White House deciding they're going to go with their own experts who they found like on TV or in bars or whatever, instead of the people who know what they're doing. All right. Watch this start in Nebraska. This is White House guidance for the state of Nebraska, August 20 30.

Dear Nebraska, you're in the yellow zone. You have the twenty fourth highest rate of new cases in the country and it's getting worse. You need to act recommendation from the White House to Nebraska as of August. Twenty third, quote, A massive mandate needs to be implemented statewide. OK, that's that's August. Twenty third and mask mandate needs to be implemented. But then look at this. Two weeks later, September 6th, more advice from the White House during Nebraska.

Ekh, you are no longer in the yellow zone. Like we told you two weeks ago, you were no longer the twenty fourth highest rate of new cases in the country. You're now 14 highest. You're no longer in the yellow zone. You're now in the red zone. This is bad.

But then look, inexplicably, despite Nebraska getting that much worse over those two weeks, in the second recommendation, the two weeks later recommendation, when things are that much worse, the White House drops the recommendation for Nebraska to require masks, they said two weeks before a mask mandate needs to be implemented statewide. Two weeks later, things are way worse than Nebraska, but no more recommendation that there be a mask requirement. Same in North Dakota. This is White House guidance for North Dakota on August 16th.

Deer, North Dakota, you're in trouble. You're in the red zone. You've got the 13th highest rate of new cases in the country. You need to make some changes, recommendations from the White House as recommendations. North Dakota, you need to strongly encourage masking state wide. You need to mandate masks in the worst of your counties. You need to limit occupancy levels and operating hours in restaurants and bars. You need to close bars and high transmission parts of the state.

That's August 16th, three weeks later, September 6th. Here's the White House again. Whoa, whoa. North Dakota, two weeks ago, you were the 13th highest rate of new cases in the country. Now you're number one. You're the worst in the country. You are in the red zone with an exclamation point. North Dakota, you are literally the highest rate of transmission in the United States. And our recommendation to you now is forget it.

It's that much worse. North Dakota's at this point the worst in the nation, but the White House drops the mask recommendation says nothing on restricting restaurants and bars, let alone closing them. That stuff from three weeks earlier just goes away, even as the situation in the state over those three weeks got so much worse. That's North Dakota, South Dakota, same deal from August 2nd to August 9th, the September 6th. South Dakota went from sixty four cases per 100000 population.

Sixty four to seventy one to two hundred and thirty five. And the White House tells them they're going from the yellow zone to the red zone, right? Oh, my God. By the time the White House is wrapping up its recommendations to South Dakota, oh, my God, you're now the second worst state in the country. But yet the White House drops its recommendation on masks. The White House started out when things weren't that bad in South Dakota with this stern recommendation that South Dakota should, quote, require face masks in indoor settings.

And then as the state of South Dakota got worse and worse and worse, they just dropped that recommendation. All this exposed in previously private secret White House documents, White House advice to individual states that have now been made public by Cliburn's committee. What's going on here? Right. You see this pattern, right? I mean, we are at two hundred thousand dead Americans, we are stuck every day at tens of thousands of new cases every day. And now we know that the White House is recommending not just publicly but privately, that states ease up on trying to stop this thing.

The White House no longer even recommending that states do things to stop the spread of this virus, things that just weeks ago they were telling the states they needed to do. What's going on here? Why would you tell them as state things are getting worse in these states? Why would you tell them? You know what? Stop trying to slow this spread. We told you mask's before. Don't worry about it. Don't do masks. We told you to close bars.

Don't worry about it. All these things are emerging at once in the news. Well, here is what's going on here. It's actually good news that the virus spreads widely because that means that we have a better chance of developing population immunity.

It would go away without the vaccine, George, but it's going to go away a lot faster, would go away without the vaccine. Sure. Over a period of time. Sure. With time, many deaths and you'll develop you'll develop like a herd mentality. It's going to be it's going to be heard developed. And that's going to happen. That will all happen.

We like the fact that there's a lot of cases. That's exactly how we're going to get herd immunity, population immunity.

Well, once you get to a certain number, you know, we use the word herd, right? Once you get to a certain number, it's going to go away to go away without the vaccine.

Sure. Over a period of time. Sure. With time, many deaths and you'll develop you'll develop like a herd mentality.

This is very, very, very bad, but let's just talk about this for a second. Let's just do the math on this for a second. I mean, the president saying in this ABC town hall last night, herd mentality, it goes away without a vaccine. What he's trying to say, I mean, it's hilarious. And it's a level that he's saying herd mentality when he means herd immunity. But what he is setting, that's not what he is trying to say is herd immunity.

Now, the president used to reference the idea of herd immunity publicly. He used to say he was against it, that it was a terrible idea. It would kill way too many Americans. But now he's got this new adviser, not an expert, not somebody who is steeped in the science here, according to his own colleagues. But this new expert the president has brought into the White House is apparently now convinced the president on herd immunity. And so this is now what we're going to do.

And this has been written off, I think, as some of the president's usual, like, nonsense. It's not worth paying too much attention to because he has such a hard time spitting the words out. Right. But don't just watch what he says, watch what he's doing, and we can now pair these. It's almost laughable. He can't remember the right words, can't spit it out words from him with what he's actually doing. And when it's not just what he's saying, it's what he's doing.

We have to recognize this as a huge deal because what the president is letting us know is that what's going to happen in our country with or without a vaccine. To his mind, the way it's going to go away is that we will aim for herd immunity, not just saying it. We now know he's doing it. And let's do the math on this. Right. This will keep you up at night. I'm sorry, but let's do it and let's be super rosy in our assumptions.

Right. The idea behind this cockamamie theory, which is apparently our national policy now, which is why North Dakota isn't being told to mask up anymore. The idea behind this cockamamie theory is that in the absence of a vaccine, maybe enough people will get infected by this disease and survive it and become immune from it, that their very existence will help slow down the spread of the virus in the future. And that's where that's how it will come to a halt.

That's the theory with this disease. We really don't know if it works that way. We don't know if getting infected with covid actually prevents you from getting it in the future. I mean, look at the latest advice on the subject. They're super clear about it. Question does the presence of antibodies against covid-19 mean a person is immune and protected from being infected again? Answer no one knows yet. If you don't like the show, ask the Mayo Clinic.

They're just as straightforward about it. Quote, It isn't yet clear if infection with the covid-19 virus makes a person immune to future infection. So scientifically, we don't even know if you getting it once keeps you from getting it again. We don't know. This is not the sort of thing you'd like to guess about. If it turns out that you can get it once and then you can get it again, the whole premise of this goes out the window in terms of it having any beneficial effect to infect lots of people whatsoever.

But let's just assume for the purposes of trying to figure out what the president is trying to do to us here, let's give him the benefit of the doubt. Let's assume that the science goes his way on this. Let's assume that getting infected does make you immune.

Again, this is not at all supported by the science, but let's just say let's just grant him that and then let's let our next assumption be just as rosy per the Mayo Clinic. Again, the expert estimate of how much of the population you'd need to be infected in order to make this work is about 70 percent of the population, quote. Experts estimate that in the United States, 70 percent of the population would have to be infected with covid-19 and recover from it to be able to halt the epidemic.

So 70 percent is the expert estimate for how this plan would work. But again, let's let's let's give the president even more the benefit of the doubt. Let's be super generous and rosy in our assumptions and say that a definitely everybody who gets it is immune. And let's also say it's only 70 percent. It's only sixty five percent of the country that needs to get infected in order to make this new White House plan work. And again, what's the plan?

We use the word dread, once you get to a certain number, it's going to go away. We like the fact that there's a lot of cases. That's exactly how we're going to get herd immunity, population immunity.

You'll develop you'll develop like a herd mentality.

This is the plan, right? So the herd mentality, the herd immunity, let's say, to be super rosy in our assumptions. Let's say in order for this to work, since this is what the president says is going to happen here, it's going to go away without a vaccine. It's going to go away with the herd. Right. He means herd immunity. He says herd mentality. Forgive him, let's forgive him. All the false assumptions here.

Right. That aren't supported by the science. Let's just give him everything he says is going to happen. Let's say it's only sixty five percent of the population you need infected. Let's say everybody who gets infected is immune. Let's just get it to. We'll do the math. We're three hundred and thirty million people in this country. Under this plan, they'd need sixty five percent of three hundred and thirty million people to be infected, they'd need two hundred and fifteen million Americans to be infected.

That's what they would aim for, for herd immunity. Well, right now we've got roughly six point six million people infected in this country and roughly two hundred thousand Americans dead, which means our fatality rate cumulatively in this country is just under three percent. It's two point nine. Seven percent of all people who have been diagnosed with covid-19 in this country have died with it. If that fatality rate stays the same and we go for a herd mentality, I mean, herd immunity, if two point nine, seven percent of all the Americans who get infected die from this thing, which is what we've had so far.

Then what he's aiming for is two hundred and fifteen million Americans dead. Excuse me, two hundred and fifteen million Americans infected, two point nine, seven percent of them dead.

That is six million three hundred and eighty five thousand five hundred Americans dead. That would be what he's aiming for here, six point four million American deaths. Now, let's rosy up our assumptions a little bit in terms of the fatality rate. Right. This is a president who keeps lying about treatment, about hydroxy Clarke and being a miracle cure or maybe a miracle preventive or who knows?

It's just definitely the solution. Right. And the CDC is warning about how that probably does more harm than good. Michael Caputo, who the Trump administration put in charge of the CDC, delayed the release of that report by weeks, while presumably bad doctors around the country who watch Fox News actually put their freaking patients on that stuff. This is a president and an administration and a conservative media universe that has lied all the time from the very beginning about whether there's a treatment for covid or even a cure for covid.

No hydroxy chloroquine, isn't it convalescent plasma even when they force through the approval of that. So they'd have something to brag about at the Republican convention? No, the science isn't there on that either. There is no cure. There is no treatment. But let's be Rosie about it again. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt right now. I said the United States overall cumulative death rate is nearly three percent of all people who've tested positive in this country have been killed by this disease.

If that holds for this next stage of the Trump plan, that would mean that the Trump White House is planning to kill off more than six point three million of us. But again, let's be Rosie. Let's say the therapeutics do come around like they keep saying on Fox News. And like the president says, that the Republican convention, let's say the US death toll drops cumulatively to not three percent, but let's say drops to two percent. Oh, let's be wildly optimistic.

Let's say the US cumulative death toll from people infected with covid drops all the way to one percent. Even still, with this herd mentality, herd, whatever herd it'll go away plan. The president is planning best case scenario, even if we triple our cumulative survival rate thus far. He is planning on killing off one percent of the population. He wants to get herd infected. All right, how does that math work out? He's planning on killing off one percent of two hundred and fifteen million Americans who he wants to get infected, which means the White House plan with all of the rosiest assumptions you can factor into it, is to kill off two point one five million Americans.

Which is considerably more than 10 times the number of us who have died already. Two point one, five million dead. That's the best case scenario. That's if everything goes great. That's the plan. The 1918 flu killed six hundred and seventy five thousand Americans. World War Two killed roughly four hundred thousand Americans. World War One killed roughly one hundred and fifteen thousand Americans. The Vietnam War killed nearly sixty thousand Americans. The new plan, what they're actually doing now, not just talking about, but doing now is to stop trying to contain the virus, to let it just run through us as a population, because the more people are infected, the better.

And honestly, because trying to stop infections has proved to be too hard for this president, I mean, all the other civilized countries on Earth can handle it and are handling it and have lost a fraction of the people that we have. But it's too hard for him. And he doesn't want to try, not when he's running for re-election. And so he's planning this new plan. It'll go away, George, without a vaccine, it'll go away.

You get the herd, the herd mentality, we call it. He doesn't want to try to contain it any more. And so he is planning on letting it run through us while he doesn't do much of anything in terms of intervention, open everything up, open the schools, don't bother with masks. Let's hold indoor rallies. Let's spread it all over. Let's just stop the testing. Right. Demand the return of college football, bring everything back.

Full speed transmission unabated. Because he says it will stop on his own. He says this thing will stop on its own with or without a vaccine because of this this heard things somebody explained to him once that he can't quite remember.

We go away without the vaccine, sure. Over a period of time, sure, with time, many deaths and you'll develop you'll develop like a herd mentality. It's going to be it's going to be heard developed. And that's going to happen. That will all happen.

This is a real thing the president is bumbling through here, we now know, based on documents exposed by the Congress, we now know that this is not something he is just saying. This is something that he is doing and his administration is putting into effect. And in this scenario, under this theory that he is using as his operative theory for how the country is dealing with covid. Now, in this scenario, the best case outcome is two point one million of us dead, and that's if our cumulative fatality rate comes way down from where it has been thus far.

That said, if things stay the way they have been so far, plan on maybe more like six million dead just here, just in the US. That's what this herd mentality thing is, that he can't even bother to memorize or learn to pronounce. That is the herd immunity idea that Sweden tried for a while, which gave him the worst death toll in northern Europe until they panicked and stopped. It's what the U.K. tried to do for a hot minute till they realized it was going to give them the worst per capita death toll in Western Europe when the president started sidelining the actual epidemiologists and infectious disease doctors and the government because he instead wanted to go with the guy he saw on Fox News who likes the herd immunity idea, even though he's not even this kind of doctor.

When the president dropped the real public health doctors and instead put this guy in charge and then all of a sudden the US government, the US government stopped recommending that people get tested and the government started saying, who cares if everybody gets infected in schools? And they rescinded their mask recommendations even to red zone states where they previously told him to do it. When we started cottoning to the fact that this wasn't some stupid viral Facebook meme that the president was repeating without being able to pronounce it, that this was actually the policy, he's turning this country toward.

Former colleagues of Scott Atlus at the medical school he used to be affiliated with tried to sound the alarm, warning that this guy who appears to be running US policy now really doesn't know what he's talking about. And specifically on the herd immunity idea, he fundamentally doesn't know what he's saying. Which is, you know, interesting in personal terms, it's kind of hilarious about Dr. Scott Atlus and his career as a Fox News Channel contrarian radiologist, but this is also the plan that the US government is following now under this president and this adviser who he likes better than the real doctors, this president can't figure out how to say it.

He can't figure out how to pronounce that. He can't remember all the syllables. But this is what he's trying to do and this is what he's trying to say. I thought the first time he burbled it out, it was some sort of kind of random omission when he said this a few weeks ago in an interview.

Well, once you get to a certain number, you know, we use the word heard, right, once you get to a certain number, it's going to go away.

That was a couple of weeks ago from him, and that seemed crazy, and I thought maybe he was just random generating syllables that he'd heard out of context and he didn't know what they attach to. But now he's repeating it.

And from what we've learned about how his administration has shut off its previous private recommendations to states to try to slow down the spread, now we know this is not just what he is saying and repeating. This is what he's going with. Please go away without the vaccine for over a period of time, sure, with time it goes any deaths and you'll develop, you'll develop like a herd mentality. It's going to be it's going to be heard developed. And that's going to happen.

That will all happen.

It is one thing to have somebody in the job of president who doesn't know what he's talking about and doesn't know that herd mentality and herd immunity are two different things. It's preposterous. But he does mean herd immunity is what we're going for. And that does if it works, it does aim for between two point one and six point four million Americans dead on purpose because he'd rather do that than do what every other country in the world has done and implement policies to contain this thing.

Policy is to contain this thing that's too hard for him, so he'll go with millions dead instead. Forty eight days till the election.

We get support from Madison Reed, it might be hard to get to a salon right now or maybe the expense is holding you back, but I'm about to collar my own hair at home, something I never thought I'd do and at a fraction of the cost of going to the salon.

All thanks to Madison Reed.

I've been hearing about Madison Reed for a while now.

My friend Kat told me how happy she was with her results and she even sent me a picture and her hair really does look great. So I went on their website. They walked me through every step of the process to make sure I picked my perfect shade. My kit just arrived and I'm super excited to try it out.

You can get multidimensional color starting at just 22 dollars at Madison, Dasch, Reed, Dotcom, use our code Matto and you'll get 10 percent off plus free shipping on your first color kit.

Again, that's code matto at Madison. Dasch, Reed Dotcom.

I want to tell you about a new podcast called To See Each Other. To See Each Other is a documentary series that complicates the narrative about rural Americans and our most misunderstood and often abandoned communities. Host George Gale, a leading grassroots organizer, travels to Michigan, Iowa, New Jersey, North Carolina and Indiana to reveal how small town folks are working together and fights for everything from clean water and racial justice to immigration rights and climate change. The show believes that when we see each other, we'll understand that we can never give up on each other, subscribe to to see each other wherever you're listening to this show.

Last evening, the president once again disparaged the importance of wearing face masks. Is the president providing appropriate leadership when it comes to this critical issue?

I'm not going to comment directly about the president, but I am going to comment as the CDC director that face masks these face are the most important, powerful public health tool we have. And I will continue to appeal for all Americans, all individuals in our country to embrace these face confidence. I've said it, if we did it for six, eight, 10, 12 weeks, we'd bring this pandemic under control.

The. CDC director Robert Redfield testifying today in the Senate, joining us now is Dr. Asheesh John. He's dean of the School of Public Health at Brown University. Dr. John, thank you so much for joining us tonight. There's a lot going on in the news, and it's a pleasure to have you here.

Thank you, Rachel. Let me start by actually getting your reaction to what we just heard there from Dr. Redfield, if we if we all wore mask for six, eight, 10, 12 weeks, which is range, we would bring this pandemic under control, calling mask's the most important public health tool that we have right now. Is that fair for him to put it that way?

It's clearly a very important public health law. So if everybody wore masks, 90 percent of Americans wore masks, let's say, for, you know, sort of like 10 to 12 weeks would make a massive difference. We could prevent a vast majority of the deaths that are likely to occur. So I largely agree with Dr. Redfield. This is a really important prevention.

This comes at the same time that we have learned that the White House has dropped its private recommendations to states that are in trouble and states that are having rising infection numbers in. Even as recently as of a few weeks ago, the White House was telling those states that in order to stop transmission, they needed to institute mask requirements. They've now stopped doing that. And they appear to have softened a lot of their other recommendations to states, even as those states have worsening epidemiological circumstances.

I find that very disturbing because I feel like that means the White House is stopping trying to get states to contain the virus. How do you view that news, particularly in light of that clear recommendation from Dr. Redfield there that masks work? Yeah, so a couple of things are going on. One is the arrival of Dr. Scott Atlas. So there is plenty of disagreement and discussions within the public health community about the right way to handle the pandemic. But Dr.

Adelies holds views that are not within the mainstream. Nobody believes in the things that he believes in. So he's not he's not a contrarian. He's just completely out of the mainstream. In his views. His arrival to the White House has meant that these really sensible guidelines at the White House was secretly sharing with states, which states where, by the way, passing out to many of us and saying these look pretty good. Don't you think they're right all of a sudden change?

And I suspect basically what has happened is that Dr. Atlas and his team are now getting to put in the recommendations and Dr. Debbie Burks and Tony Foushee, who really are experts in this, their voices seem diminished to me, at least in those recommendations. Why would you tell a state to state a state that where the infection rate is getting worse right now, what is the conceivable rationale for no longer recommending to that state that they use masks?

Well, there is this group of people. As I said, these are not in the mainstream. They're not even just contrarians that we look at and say, well, they have some unusual views. These people just I think they don't know what they're talking about. They really do believe that the idea here is let's get everybody infected. And, you know, we have robust debates about whether one or two or six million people would die from a herd immunity approach.

But everybody agrees it would be awful. It is a terrible strategy. There is no one I know who is a serious person in this area who actually thinks that anything resembling herd immunity is even remotely reasonable. My sense is Dr. Alice believes it, and that's what's driving the White House recommendations. I obviously don't know for sure, but that's what I'm guessing. But the fact that the fact that the White House isn't just talking about it, that they are appearing to act this out in terms of what they're telling states to do and states that, like the White House, are going along with these change recommendations.

I find this I find this turn in the news very disturbing. Dr. Sheesha, dean of the School of Public Health at Brown University. Dr. John, thank you for being with us and being so clear, as always.

Thank you, Rachel. All right. Much more ahead tonight. Stay with us. The fact is, more than 190 million Americans experienced cyber crime last year and victims spent more than 500 million hours trying to resolve their issues. That's a lot of victims spending a lot of time dealing with cybercrime. There are more cyber threats every day. It's hard to know how to help protect your devices. Online privacy and identity in today's connected world. So there's Norton 360 with LifeLock.

It provides seamless protection for your digital life, giving you device security, identity theft protection, a VPN for online privacy and more. Plus, if there's an ID theft problem, a dedicated U.S. based restoration agent will work to fix it for you. Now no one can prevent all cybercrime and identity theft, but Norton 360 with LifeLock is your trusted ally in today's connected world. Sign up for a Norton 360 with LifeLock membership today and you can save 25 percent or more off your first year.

Go to Norton Dotcom Matto. That's Norten Dotcom Matto for 25 percent off. We covered and upsetting story here on the show last night about allegations arising from a whistleblower complaint out of an ice detention facility in Irwin County, Georgia. According to the complaint, immigrant and refugee women who are being held at this federal facility were routinely sent to a gynecologist who performed unnecessary procedures on them, including hysterectomy. One detainee quoted in the complaint says she's talked to five different women who were held at that facility between October and December.

All five said they were given medically unnecessary hysterectomy by the same doctor. And at least some of these instances, these women allegedly had their reproductive organs removed without them giving proper informed consent. For the record, ICE is denying these allegations. The doctor in question says he vehemently denies the allegations. The private company that operates this facility also says it refutes these allegations. We have not independently confirmed whether these allegations are true. The story was understandably met with horror and revulsion from the public, including from a lot of you guys, our viewers who we heard from after last night's show.

But it's also not raising the alarm in Congress, and that is shaking loose some new information. More than one hundred and seventy congressional Democrats have now called on, called for an immediate investigation into these claims by the inspector general at the Homeland Security Department. One of those lawmakers is Congressman Elijah Paul. She says she has spoken with three lawyers who represent some of the women making these allegations. And today, she says, based on her conversation with those attorneys, she thinks this is a bigger problem than what we knew last night.

She says, quote, It appears that it may be, at minimum, 17 to 18 women who were subjected to unnecessary medical gynecological procedures from just this one doctor, often without appropriate consent or knowledge and with the clear intent of sterilization, according to Congressman Pramila Jaya Paul. She says her preliminary investigation here indicates this is at least 17 women. Congresswoman joins us next. Stay with us. Congressman Paul spoke to several lawyers who represent women who are detained at an ice facility in Irwin County, Georgia, women who say they were forced to undergo gynecological procedures without their consent while in federal custody.

Congressman Paul says after those conversations, she believes that it may be as many as 17 women who are forced to undergo these medically unnecessary procedures. She also has anecdotal information about specific women's experiences. That's almost unbelievably horrifying. She says, quote, One woman, Pauline, it was nearly deported this morning, consulted the doctor simply about her menstrual cycle. She was put under for what she was told would be a simple procedure only to wake up and find that the doctor had removed part of her reproductive organs without her knowledge or consent.

Joining us now is congresswoman from Illinois, Paul of Washington State. Congresswoman, thank you so much for being here. I appreciate you doing this investigative work already and helping us understand it. Thank you, Rachel. I know that you're on the relevant subcommittee here in terms of oversight of these matters from Congress, but let me just ask about your initial reaction and how you pursued trying to learn more about these claims.

Well, when I heard about it, I heard about it through the whistleblower complaint and immediately read that complaint was quite disturbed by what was in there, but unclear about are we how could we verify this? And so immediately felt that it was necessary to have an investigation because the charges were serious. And, of course, you know, I've been working on the ice sort of medical issues in detention for a long time. It was not beyond the pale that this would be happening.

But then in the meantime, I was able to talk last night with three attorneys who represent a number of women. And what happened is that when the story broke, these attorneys started talking to each other. In the past, they had had individual clients, but they weren't necessarily talking about what their clients were experiencing. And I think that when the story broke, it really led them to start to talk to each other and realized that they each had clients with similar experiences.

For example, one one set of attorneys said that, you know, often what might happen is a woman is told that she has ovarian cysts and she goes in to the doctor to supposedly get those ovarian cysts drained. And then she ends up with a medical procedure that is either partial or a full hysterectomy. And this was stunning to me. And so at least 17 to 18 women who are represented by attorneys have had these unnecessary medical procedures, according to these attorneys who are extremely reputable.

I know them, have worked with some of them, really do trust what they are saying. Now, in addition to that, Rachel, as you know, many of the people who are in immigration detention are processed. They're completely unrepresented. They don't have attorneys. I think that if this was happening to these individuals that have attorneys and we're just finding out about it, it is possible that this is even larger than just the 17 or 18 that we know of.

I just described one anecdote that you shared today publicly talking about this woman, Pauline. She said she consulted a doctor about her menstrual cycle. She was put under for what she was told to be a simple procedure, only to wake up and find that the doctor had removed part of her reproductive organs without her knowledge or consent. You also note there, though, in telling her story that she was very nearly deported this morning. I have heard over the course of the day that you and some of your colleagues in Congress have had to intervene to try to stop her from being sent out of the country while she's now potentially an important witness in this investigation.

That's right. Yesterday, when I heard about all of this, I immediately worked with Chairman Nadler, Zoe Lofgren, Judy Chu, we got one hundred and seventy three members on a letter calling for an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General at DHS. And then I hear from these attorneys last night. This was probably nine o'clock last night that they had just been told that Pauline was going to be deported and she's one of the individuals and that she was going to be on a flight at eight thirty this morning from Texas.

She had been transferred from Georgia to Texas about a year ago. She's been in detention for three years, Rachel, two of those in Georgia. And I immediately called my colleague Sheila Jackson Lee and said we have to stop her from being deported because we need her for this investigation. And I am troubled that she is suddenly being deported. And so Representative Jackson Lee did a fantastic job. She got a written confirmation last night that the stay would be for 72 hours.

But then this morning when we checked it, it turned out that Pauline had still been put on that plane. And again, Representative Jackson Lee working together, she was able to call and get Pauline taken off the plane in Chicago. This was a commercial flight. Pauline had already been flown from Houston to Chicago. By the time we were able to get her off. But it was on the runway in Chicago. She was she was pulled off that plane.

She is now being returned to Texas. She must be there by now. And we are we intend to make sure that we get to hear from Pauline as part of our investigation. And we're also calling on ice immediately to stop deporting any other women. That might be a part of this investigation that we need to talk to, because we do know from these attorneys that some of their clients were already deported. They are in touch with them. For example, one woman in El Salvador who had a procedure done, she is going back to get her medical record and making sure that we have that information.

Congresswoman from Eligio Paul, Democrat of Washington, this is obviously a very live and developing issue, keep us apprised and thank you for helping us understand. Thank you so much, Rachel, for covering this terrible, terrible issue.

The Rachel Maddow Show weeknights at 9:00 Eastern on MSNBC. Hey, guys, Willie Geist here this week on the Sunday Sit Down podcast, I get together with Kelly Clarkson to talk about her time at home during quarantine, her highly anticipated new music and her Emmy winning talk show. Get our conversation now for free wherever you download your podcasts.