Welcome to today's edition of the Rush Limbaugh Show podcast. It is always an incredible honor to sit in for Rush Limbaugh 802 eight to 208 to taken the baton from Marc Stein, who handed it to Ken Matthews hands it to me, it takes three or four of us now to fill in for Rush Limbaugh while he's out doing what needs to get done, 800 to eight to 288 to. You might have heard on today that the day the Lord has made for all of us is a gift for all of us.

And I know prayers are a rising up to to God for this country. And it's a great time to pray for the spirit of truth and to remember that God is in charge. You may have heard a rumor that the major media or as I call them, news programmers, programming people, and I spell it in Ozzy, the CNN's and The New York Times of the World, etc., who you may have heard that they decided not to air.

The hearings, the vote fraud hearings, you might have heard that Jim Acosta was complaining about the president doing a 45 minute video to explain his case, suspicion of massive vote fraud of a voting system under coordinated attack. You might have heard that rumor. But that's not what happened. What happened is that they once again are telling you to shut up, that your voices do not matter, and if you do a comparison here, this is a fascinating comparison.

What does a truck driver. A gentleman named Jesse Morgan who offered his experience on what happened with his truck trailer filled with, as he said, completed ballots that were to go to three states, a trailer of votes that apparently disappeared. He's a whistleblower. In a media world that for the past four years. Has relied on anonymous pretend whistleblowers. To tell you that the president you elected was a Russian asset and a Russian spy. This whistleblower, what does he have to gain?

There's no book offering. There's no CNN gig, there's no lecture series. What does he have to gain by speaking out? Flip that comparison around. What does CNN or MSNBC, what do they have to gain? By silencing him. Or by pretending he didn't speak. There's a calculus here. The more people have to lose. In what if, God forbid, Biden takes office, will come the way of this country. The more people will have to lose.

The more they're speaking out. And the more the one sided media. Is silencing them or pretending things aren't happening, and it's not just truck drivers. You know, I see I see Momsen and volunteers at polling places saying I was coerced, that. I was threatened for trying to do my job as a poll watcher, I was threatened, which, by the way, happens to be a crime.

To threaten a poll watcher who's trying to complete their duty, I would think that that women being threatened. Who are they're going to volunteer? I would think that threats towards women in a political process, I would think that would be. Major news, what do these women have to gain? By going public with their concerns. I remember the Capitol hearings, and I I don't recall anyone being published or punished for the lies there. All right, what what do these women now who are being ignored told to sit down and that's the passive statement from the media.

Is it your voice? Does it matter? Didn't matter when you were frustrated continually with the GOP? That was not brave. There's not fighting for conservative principles or small government, but sort of managing the decline. When you spoke up and said, no, we are going to have an outsider, you are told for four years you made the wrong decision. And it's gotten worse over the past year. It's not just moms, there's there's retired colonels.

Phil Waldron. A former combat officers have backgrounds in army information in electronic warfare. He points to the sort of anomalies that I with a digital background Im fascinated by. Blocs of votes showing up ninety nine point four percent for Biden. Six tenths of one percent. For Donald Trump, massive numbers of votes. Showing up with mathematically impossible. Statistically impossible. Percentages of votes for one candidate in this this retired colonel. The the news programmers are programming people to not know that this happened.

And I can recall. I can recall a whole series. Of anonymous intelligence sources and anonymous sources in the military, I can recall a pencil pushing. Person who was regarded, as you know, from the military, was regarded as some sort of hero for his whistleblowing. Now he's he's not going to go out in a lecture series. And what does Colonel Phil Waldron have to gain?

So you might have heard that the news programmers are programming people to not know that the president gave this presentation or at least to not look at the presentation because they're proud of the fact that they're not showing it to the American people. But it's you they're not presenting. It's your voice they're not presenting. If one thing has become clear to me in the past two years, it's that the most powerful tool. At the disposal of the media. Is what I call the propaganda of silence, there are simply people.

Who do not know the amount of suspicious activities, the amount of suspicious data, the number of votes that should not be kept. Let me give you another example. In Georgia, I continue to hear, well, that's the second recount and everything's fine, and you know what the allegation is not? They got their numbers wrong, no one saying they did bad arithmetic. That's not the that's not the accusation. The concern and the accusation is that some of these ballots shouldn't have been counted.

And what do people have to gain? By coming out and saying, when I was a poll watcher, I watched ballots counted thousands of times the same pile of ballots. But again, flip it. Do we not think that the news programmers would get more audience if they had both sides of the story being shown? Do we not think that people would tune in to watch a 45 minute presentation from the president of the United States saying our electoral system is under attack and it's that it's not that it's not that I expect them to do this.

I've learned that it's not bias, it's not just leaning the other way, this is a meddling in the American mind. But it's just further to say, don't you think they would get more viewers and of course they would. What does a former attorney general of the state of Kansas? Phil Klein, what does he have to gain? By saying publicly this is one of the most lawless elections in history. Does he expect to get a CNN gig or book deals?

That's not the way the media has set this up. The reward platter is there for the people who do one thing. Silence you. And you compare it across the board. The news programmers have programmed people to believe. That if you step outside your house, you will catch the covid flu and you will die now of Rush's audience, we understand that's not the case. But do you know that there was a poll done that the average American thinks thought that 30 million Americans had died from the covid flu?

That's an invention of the media. It is a pushing of panic of the media. What does a gym owner or a bar owner? This is in Staten Island, New York. A bar owner decided to open. They basically raided his property. I think he'd set up set himself up as an autonomous zone. Like they did in Seattle and like they did in in in New York, trying to set up autonomous zones, he said, hey, I'm an autonomous zone.

No, no, you don't get to do that. What does he have to gain his life? You're talking here about people fighting for their economic existence, they're the ones speaking out. And the same news programmers who are programming people to believe there's no evidence have programmed people to believe that the lockdown's are helping. When a side by side comparison will show you they are not helping, side by side comparison will show you lockdown, no lockdown masks, no masks, viruses run a very predictable course.

That's always been the case. Winter is a big time for viruses, but the news programmers have programmed people to not know this. So you may hear a rumor that they're not displaying the president's voice. Well, that's true. But they're really showing you that it's futile. To share your voice, so will you give up? You won't we will fight for this country, we will fight for truth, we will ask God to stand on our side because we're trying to stand on the side of truth and.

As the dearly departed Walter Williams said. Freedom is not the natural state of things. And I fear that the elitists sense an opportunity to once again rule us, will we be ruled or but we continue to speak up.

Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB.

No, it's Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh on the EIB Network 822 Tuesday to. Want to set the scene for you, it's just a moment to dispel with another myth, we were just talking about the myth that the media is ignoring the voice of the president, the United States, as he makes his case for what he considers to be massive signs of voter fraud. And he went so far as to say the election system is under coordinated attack. Now, how bizarre is that, that you would say that there could be a coordinated attack on America, that that can't happen here?

It simply can't it's not as if we have to domestic terror groups who've been practicing street warfare in the United States with the full knowledge and basic consent of Democrats for the past year. Oh, wait, that did happen. It's not as if there were two coordinated attempts to murder police officers in Seattle, Washington. Oh, wait, that did happen. A baseball bat to the back of the head in an attempt to burn them down inside a building in teef.

It tried to seal them within, but they would never attack our voting system. That's sacrosanct. So that's that's got to be another myth. There's another myth. The myth is that there's been a lockdown on the economy, mother has. No, no, there's been no lockdown on the economy, there's been a lockdown on your economy. There's been no lockdown. There has been a lock up of U. The people who are speaking out about vote fraud.

Are the same group of people speaking out about election fraud or pardon me, about lock down fraud? There's a scene, and I wish I knew exactly where this was filmed. It's there's a reporter. He's doing a stand up outside of a restaurant that refuses to close down. And he's he's getting ready to do his thing. It's early in the morning and he's got a stocking cap on and he's going to do a stand up report. A business owner stands in defiance.

Then behind him, there's a dude that comes into the camera frame. It's the business owner. And the business owner says. Why don't you tell my story, I'm right here. And the reporter stunned, it turns around and and he says the stupidest thing. To this business owner, he says, Do you think this is the right thing to do? The stupidest possible thing, do you think it's the right thing to fight for your economic existence?

You still think this is the right thing to do? And the business owner says, yes, it's the right thing to do. And the reporter doubles down, but you're you're you're standing against the governor's orders. And the business owner reaches a point of frustration. His orders wake up, this is tyranny. And it is because there's been the lockdown. There are companies making money hand over fist. But we're told by the left that. Economic inequality.

Is the death knell of what they call our democracy and what we refer to as our republic. They tell us we must iRace somehow magically make go away student debt. Because it's an economic hardship. But in areas of our country, 40 percent of small businesses. Pagone. Small businesses become big businesses. True wealth is an ownership. True freedom, economically speaking, is in ownership. And that ownership. It's gone. Isn't it fascinating? That this reporter had the same sort of response.

To a business owner refusing to shut down his restaurant. That this reporters have to whistleblowers about election fraud. Are you saying. That you saw something untoward. Are you saying you don't believe? The authorities are you saying? Did you suspect skullduggery? Half the nation. Is enjoying record gains. In the lockdown, politicians everywhere. Are ignoring their own diktats. I could do an hour. On politicians ignoring the diktats that they are putting other people under.

And it's the same I don't want to say class of people, because they don't believe in putting people in classes, but it's the same sorts of people who go volunteer as poll watchers who start small businesses. And the stakes are the same. We have Joe Biden, who, if God forbid, is ever present in United States, has already said with the waving of a pen, with the stroke of a pen, he intends to go to you and say, give this random person money for their college debt because they signed up for it.

They don't want to pay it now. You have to pay it. You have people, 40 percent of small businesses disappearing, being told yet. But we're going to need you to go ahead and pay that debt. And it's the same sorts of people, retired colonels and truck drivers, who will be paying these debts. Isn't it fascinating that it's the same news programmers programming people to believe there's no sign of fraud, there's no sign of voter irregularities, there's no evidence, not a scintilla of evidence.

But just yesterday on this program, Ken Matthews filling in for Rush Limbaugh reminded us about Pennsylvania, one point eight million ballots out the door, two point four million come back, or 2.5 million, a magic increase. Rand Paul has reminded us that between the hours of 138 and six. Thirty a.m., President Trump lost his lead overnight while the counting stopped. And I'll remind you of this, something else that you may not have heard from the news programmers who are programming you to believe that everything's on the up and up in terms of how we're counting covid.

18 international life scientists, 18 of them wrote a paper. Calling the PCR test, this is the test they use to determine if someone has covered positive, calling it fatally flawed, 10 fatal flaws, they want it not used any longer. One of these guys was a VP of Pfizer, I think research. Funny thing, even when people who were at that level speak up and it somehow doesn't match the everybody's, everybody is sacrificing narrative begets violence.

To your phone calls next. Is Todd Herman in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB.

So which side of the equation, which side you find yourself, the side that's been locked down and locked out or the side that has seen an increase in your net worth and an increase in the things you're going to get on? What side of that argument are you on the side of the bill payer or you on the side of those who've been forced to sacrifice or those who are done sacrificing is a lot of restaurant owners are, and a lot of bar owners and gym owners are done sacrificing.

Now they're going to fight. What side of this do you find yourself? And as we look at this possibility and it's it's a strong one, let's be honest with ourselves. Right. There's a very narrow path for the president to get in front of the Supreme Court with this evidence. I would just say again to the court, you are either you will make a decision one way or the other by deciding to not hear the case is deciding to say it's not worth being heard.

And to the Supreme Court, you will be telling 50 percent of Americans you. Are not worth being heard. And you'll be choosing economic sides. Because there are sides that are going to benefit if, God forbid, Biden is president, sides that are going to benefit from big government grabbing and taking and then giving to others. And using water, the opposite of rights, the Bill of Rights restrains government from doing to you.

The image of Kamala Harris and her vice president, Joe Biden, is a possible vice president. Is that the government must do to you when donors say due to them? I keep looking forward to Jeff Bezos writing probably a 12 to 18 billion dollar check to all the small businesses that his locked down. Because I haven't seen him ask for the lockdown to end. Maybe 12, maybe 18 billion, bring some of the small businesses back to life, don't run it through the government.

Jeff. Give it directly to some of the businesses, business owners, so they can come back. Jeff? And you can earn it back with carried interest. On your investments and God bless you for the for the invention of Amazon. Now, how about if you do what you pretend you are about, which is right, help the little guy look forward to that. Greg in Houston, Texas, you're on the Rush Limbaugh program. It's tournament filling in.

Good morning, Greg.

I thought I just wanted to say I feel like you're really picking on college kids with the student loan debt. You know, I mean, I graduated in 2009 when it was the worst recession since the Great Depression. And it was tough. There wasn't a lot of jobs out there for any of us and for you to make it seem like taxpayer money is only going to go to help out college kids pay off their student loans. You know, how much money gets wasted, how much taxpayer money gets wasted on bailouts?

Just a farmer bailout with tweedlee. I didn't see you, you know, rolling up your listeners to get mad at Trump for bailout farmers. You get so mad at bailing out students.

Oh, you didn't hear when I talked about the bailout being a bad idea, you weren't listening that they just tuned in about 10 minutes ago.

So if not, I apologize.

All right. So you have no idea what my position on the bailouts were. I just heard you riling up your listeners saying that college kids are debts are going to be paid more than people shouldn't stand for it.

Oh, so I was riling people up. I believe so, yes. I feel like they're still rounding people up.

OK, so when you when you called me when you were going to take on that college debt, what did I say to you?

Basically, I felt like I heard you saying, hold on.

I'm not sure. I'm not sure I understand you, Greg. I'm not going to hang up on you. I want to have the conversation. Greg, when you were getting ready to take on that college debt and you called me at home and you said, hey, Todd, I'm thinking about taking on debt for college.

What advice did I give you specifically talking about what advice would you give me?

Yeah, you know, when you back in 2009, when you decided to take on that college debt and you called me at home to get my opinion about that. What advice did I give you? In 2009, yeah, are you speaking of a hypothetical because I didn't know you in 2009. Wait, so you didn't call? You didn't call me and ask my opinion about taking that loan right now? No, I just heard it now. Oh, OK.

So I'm trying to figure out where your debt.

I always listen to you and your ear. Unrushed. I don't want to hear you say that.

Greg, I'm not I'm I am trying to illustrate what I consider to be an absurdity here. OK, I'm trying to figure out where I became a cosigner to your life.

When did you become a cosigner under the farmers bailout? This early last year because of Trump's tariffs.

What did you think of that? I'm sorry. Are we going to go back to that 28 billion?

Are we going to go through a lot of things that get bailed out? Right. Sorry. Are we going to go back to you don't know my position on bailouts. We've established that. Let's talk about your situation. Let's talk about your situation. What what what did you pursue in school?

Kinesiology. I want to be a PE teacher.

OK, how much money did you take out for that? I really wasn't even that much thought. I had like five thousand dollars in student loan debt, not even that much. But it's the principle that y'all single us out, like the government only bailing out college kids when the government bailed out people all the time. And I don't I don't hear your side complaining about it only when it affects people on the left. I feel like you're picking on college kids that you think we're liberals.

Interesting.

Did you just bailing out liberals? Were you on hold?

While I was just talking about Jeff Bezos, I vaguely heard I'm actually working right now.

Oh, wait, so so wait. What you're working right now is a teacher. No, no, I don't know. I don't. I didn't. And it's a long story why I'm not a PE teacher. Oh, what are you doing now? I was for a part time. What do you mean? It's not something I'm proud of. What are you doing now?

I deliver pizzas. Why don't you your.

I needed a job over this. Honestly, it's a long story. I have one if you really want to go into it. Like I got an assault charge from me and my dad got in a fight. Oh. And I feel like that's holding me back a lot of, you know, real jobs that I could pursue with my degree. But because I have that, you know, domestic violence charge, it looks really bad on paper. But it was just me and my dad getting in a fight like that happens.

I just got in trouble for it. Yeah. So who got the best of things?

Did your dad get the best of you in The Fighter?

No, I won. That's the problem. It's not this is the fight that goes into the fight. He started it. Yeah. Fight.

Well, it sounds like I mean, it sounds like you're pretty buttoned up and kind of got things, you know, together. So I can understand why you'd find it offensive that I would be asking why I should pay your bills.

And let me present this to you much you think on your taxes are going to go towards fifty cents?

Oh, did you want to talk about economics? Because we can do that, too. But I just wanted to get this across real quick. How much money do you think it cost me to not go to college to drop out in my first year? Because I got I got done with football. How much?

I think that people who graduate from college should be should be the first in line for student debt forgiveness. The people who just want their a year and a half to drop out. I feel like those to be and maybe I'm being a little bit of an elitist out there, but I actually like what they got, what they paid for. They got a graduated college student and I just happened to graduate in 2009, which you remember well, what are the worst recessions we've had since the Great Depression?

And there was no I guess I guess for I'm just I find myself just lost here is I didn't couldn't afford college after football stopped and I dropped out. And it's funny, I have never gone to someone and said, hey, could you pay back my debt? Because I never took money out because I went the route that you're taking now was working in jobs that are manual labor. I did that while I taught myself a skill. And that skill involved radio.

And then from radio, I said, man, I don't know if I want to work on radio for the rest of my life. Maybe I should teach myself computer code and maybe I should learn to do computer code. And then I hooked up with some really smart people because they had an idea for a company. And I worked for a year for free borrowing. Third day old chicken from convenience stores, borrowing three bucks for my now wife so I could buy three day old chicken because the convenience store guy held that for me in between donating blood from time to time and working for free for a year to build a company that then got venture capital backing.

And then I paid employees before I paid myself for the first year. So I guess, you know, I just we took a little bit different path. But what I'll do is I'll go through and add up all the money that my dad work so hard.

It's almost like you're resentful. It's like, well, if I had to do it this like nobody else, it's an easy way out.

Hey, but what's the easy way out? You know what? You just answered a great question. Am I resentful? No, I don't resent that. You took out five thousand dollars in a loan so that you could go deliver pizza after getting in an assault charge by beating up your dad. I'm not resentful that at all. I'm just saying, Greg, when you called and you make a point like this, maybe next time do a little bit more thinking about what the long term economic impact of paying off.

Or making disappear. Student loans are let me ask you this question, do you think the pizza place you work for would charge more or less for pizza? If we guaranteed everybody in the nation got free pizza, would they suddenly cut their rates?

It seems like you're always willing to cut out the little person first. Why are you so worried about big business or even why are you so worried about people that only they're not the people you work for?

We are back to where we started where you forgot to list on hold, as I just told Jeff Bezos, to hand over 12 to 18 billion dollars. Great. I'm listening. I think the hoodie.

What's the piece of place you work for Marcus Marcus piece on Friendswood, Texas. All right. So Marcus Pizza, Greg is right now on the phone instead of delivering pizzas, but he's highly buttoned up and we should pay his college debt. Greg, thanks for calling Rush's show. It was very entertaining. Good luck to you. I do hope and I pray and I honestly do, Greg, that you start to take responsibility for yourself, because then I think you might have a place to go.

God bless you, Greg. Appreciate you calling Rush's show. It's Tirman in for Rush Limbaugh.

This is for we just had Greg on who apparently beat up his dad.

I wonder if his dad might call in, so we just said, Greg, eleven years ago, college student, five grand, hasn't paid off the debt yet, but he is sort of delivering pizzas. Oh, and his assertion that I'm just all obsessed about college students. No, it's not the individual college student. It's this fact. I just use this example. If if if Harvard or colleges like that wanted to provide free college legitimately free, you know how they could do this for real, just take their endowments and simply apply the interest they earned from the endowments.

They could give everybody free college in perpetuity without bothering the taxpayer. You got a 39 billion dollar endowment, but they'll still take tax moneys to put people in college. The reason that college rates are up is because they're cronie, they're fake, fake non-profit, fake academics, it's a profit center and they're tied in to government largesse. And the reason that I was picking on Bezos and asking him for 12 to 18 billion for small businesses is because Bezos, his stocks have skyrocketed during what is for you a lock up and for him a free up.

It is a side by side comparison, big business win here and there. The people with the lobbyists, they're the people who donate to Democrats. Have you seen the shift that it's big business giving to big government? Because don't tell me they don't look at China and go, wow, that's cool. They can force people to purchase their products. Basils has a de facto monopoly. On on bringing people things in their houses because of the logistics that he built in his genius and what he should be saying right now, Jeff Bezos, if he wants to be consistent, is, hey, listen, if my delivery drivers can operate in my warehouses, can operate and in my business office can operate than the small businesses can operate.

Hey, Jeff. What about it? What about it? Should the economy open up or should it just be Amazon? Are you willing to pay a royalty to small businesses, Jeff? I say 25 cents on every Amazon dollar goes directly to small businesses most impacted. Let's do it this way. If people buy food items from you. Twenty five percent goes to restaurant associations or to restaurants. What do you say, Jeff? Call the show 800 Chewey to Twitter to make the announcement here.

The big win, big PR win for you. Let's talk to Paul in Columbus, Ohio. Paul, you're on the Rush Limbaugh program is taught Hermann filling in. Hi, Paul. Good morning, Todd. I just want to say right off the bat that I want to pay my bills, are you?

The reason I called, though, is the top achievement of the Trump president. Trump's administration will be and it's actually in process of the exposing of election fraud in the American electoral system and his restoration of the integrity of that same electoral system. Yeah, I think that that I would expand your point, and I agree with it, I think that President Trump, Donald John Trump has had some inexorable changes to our society, and I think they're very positive.

He has unmasked that there is a deep state. And I was uneasy with that phrase because it sounded conspiratorial to me six years ago, five years ago. And now I will tell you the deep state extends into the offices of so-called public health officials who are doing nothing for public health. And I listen, I have to be careful because I can obsess about the covid flu. I read about it 40 hours a week. I'm obsessed with this deception.

It extends to there. So the president has unmasked. That's a reality all the way up to the top of the FBI. He's unmasked, that they're willing to lie to a court and they don't get punished. They're willing to lie to the let's not kid ourselves that the Supreme Court's the most powerful court. I would say the FISA court, John Roberts private court, which is a secret court, appears to be more powerful because they can spy on American citizens, you know, based on lies he's exposed that he has taken the mask completely off of big news programmers where we know that they are election meddlers.

He's done the same with social media. He's exposed them fully nakedly and then their desperation to get him out of the way for whatever is next, like the you know, Joe Biden parading around with this website, which is build back better dot gov, which is interesting because that's the same thing. All the the big government people around the globe are saying, hey, let's build back better now that we've destroyed everything. I think that he has surfaced that.

But now here's here's the challenge, though, Paul, is if, God forbid, the president doesn't get a second term, he has pushed his ball up into the air above the net. What do we do? Right.

It's set at great personal cost. He has what do we do with it if, God forbid, the president is not in a second term, what do we do with that ball up above the net? OK, she's had auerback, she needs us to get his back, and I would say this, that what the put is the ball up above the net, like the volleyball, I don't know.

I'm thinking of volleyball, but it's up there, I think, to put where we slam that ball back down, as we say. No, there's no new normal. Rush Limbaugh has said our goal must be normal, not the new normal. That's what we need to push for and pray for and demand out of this nation.

It's a great call. Thanks for calling Roadshow's tournament in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB.

That was Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh. The EIB Network talked. Talk to Lee in Clinton Township, Michigan. Lee, you're on Rush's show. It's tournament filling in highly.

Hi, Todd. I'm one of those left wing liberal progressives who watches all of Trump's speech yesterday. And that's Sidney Powell news conference yesterday in Atlanta. So I try to understand both sides. Good for you. The Georgia election for Senate, there are two runoffs for U.S. Senate might turn into a disaster. Republicans are working at cross purposes. They're attacking Republican elected officials and they are questioning the validity of the vote. I think they might blow to Senate seat and turn it everything over to the Democrats in the U.S. Senate next year.

Yeah, I think that in Georgia, you know, I'm confused by the strategy of not voting for Republicans in order to own the Libs. I would say this, that there is the the mayor of real might tell us that that there is a reality. And I don't mean to speak for Rush, only Rush speaks for Rush. But I would say that that seems to be an odd strategy for me, because Joe Manchin, I've heard people say, well, Joe Manchin will protect us.

No, he won't. If the vote's tight, Joe will go with the Democrats in Georgia. Please, please, please. I am suspicious of the election down there, as I could possibly be. And in Pennsylvania and in Wisconsin. And please, please, please don't give in to the idea of losing is winning. Please go vote for these Republicans and let's concentrate on trying to clean this up and continues.

Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.

I'm an 18 year old college kid chilling in his dorm room at the University of Alabama, which just happens to have a lot to say. And when I say a lot to say, I mean a lot to say about everything else. And I'm the host of the brand new podcast, C.J. Pearson Uncensored. Now, this isn't going to be your typical political podcast. And what I say, well, sometimes that gets me in trouble. Why? Because I couldn't care less about the correct or respecting anyone suspicious, because until the world has had to go all willy nilly, what the hell was a safe space?

What the hell was his idea that feelings mattered more than facts? We went from a world that actually Biotrue to order, which people now make the argument with a straight face that there are more than 80 genders to a world that shames people for loving America too much. I'm tired of it, and that's why I'm here. Listen to C.J. Pearson uncensored every Thursday on the radio app, Apple podcast, wherever you get your podcast.

And I want to thank Mr. Limbaugh and the EIB Network for the great honor of filling in on the world's biggest radio show, 800 202 202 if you care to join us. And today is, in fact, the day the Lord has made. And if there is a season for prayer revival, this this would be it. The spirit of truth, I would pray, would come upon this nation because it's simply not here. And this audience and this rush, once out of the kindness of his heart, did a a little audio bit for me when I was celebrating an anniversary of my radio show, which airs the mornings in Seattle.

And he in in very rushy and fashion, referred to me as the most effective kiss up in radio, which is one of the reasons he allows me to host the show when he's not in. And I loved it. My audience loved that we aired this at a live show. So I see these things and I've heard Mark and Ken and and Derek in all of us want to honor this program. And you in building this program, I don't know if you know how lucky you are and what a small group of people you are.

I mean, it's a huge audience, 80 million people to understand the new numbers are. But there's a specialness to the information that is given here because it's been consistent. I heard Mark and Ken both make this point that's been consistent all these years, a consistent point of view. It hasn't changed. It doesn't move with the times we live in. And this is so important because we live in a time that to me is the age of disinformation.

And it is so incredible to watch the social media platforms, which should they are publishers. There's they're not there's nothing platformer about them. And because they're because they're publishers, they should be liable to the same lawsuits that all other publishers are. It's so amazing to watch them pretend that they are cracking down on misinformation when what they're actually cracking down are on our core facts. And there is a comparison between the big lies about the covid response and the big lies about the election and prior to the election.

And I want to try to compare these for you. Do you know that it's a pretty solid fact now that the covid flu has been in the United States since December of 2013, we know this because of blood samples and antibodies in blood. So that point, do you understand how important that point is in relation to the percentage of death or the death rates from the covid flu? The World Health Organization has finally admitted that the death rate is twenty three one hundredth of one percent point to three percent, and it might be less than that.

It could get down to one tenth of one percent because the longer it's been in the country, the the the the lower the death rate. Is that key piece of information you now have? Most of your neighbors don't. Because news programmers are programming people to believe the opposite cases, cases, cases, deaths, deaths, deaths, they're programming people to believe. Nonsense, compare that to the Hunter Biden story. Compare that to Zaphod Rush to a master monologue on the eight things that would have changed the outcome, eight to ten stories about Hunter Biden that would have Joe Biden, that would have changed the outcome of the election had they been known or changed up to eight percent of people's votes.

Democrats. The news programmers programmed people to believe that discussion of Hunter Biden's laptop was a conspiracy theory. When in fact, we know it's very, very real, these are editorial decisions. That they're making to pick and choose important information for you to have it, here's the commonality. Fighting the death rate from you empowers the forces of lockdown because you are locked up. Big business is flourishing. Netflix has record record revenues. Meanwhile, local theaters are being destroyed.

Case point number two. This is this is a fascinating discovery around the PCR test, this and this can seem really geeky. So make this as simple as I can. I've been reporting forever that the PCR tests that determine if you're covered positive, they return about 90 percent false positives. And it's because they magnify the DNA a trillion times so they can find a single tiny shred of a leftover viral fragment from a so-called dead virus. Now, it's worse than that, Michael.

You're doing it with some other other scientists. Michael was a VPI, I think, of Fizer and very, very senior scientist. They've published a paper, 18 of them peer reviewed paper, saying there are 10 major scientific flaws with that test that render it useless. It's not telling us. If there's positive covid cases, it's telling us someone may have once had a cold, someone may have once had a flu. Those are being applied to death rates.

Now, compare that technical detail, the flaws that the news programmers won't tell you about the core test related to covid positivity. Compare that to the Dominion voting machines. I watched part of a conference in twenty sixteen in San Francisco, a critical infrastructure conference. There were three techies on this panel. This wasn't a political conference. No one knew at that point the Dominion would be in question in relation to massive electoral fraud in our country. These techies were talking about how ridiculous the Dominion system is, how hackable it is that, of course, it's connected to the Internet.

They went so far as to say that script kiddies could get into the Dominion system. What does a script kitty mean? It means that real hackers figure out how to get into a system. Then they publish what's called an exploit. It's like a cookbook or hacking cookbook, except all the script kiddies have to do is copy their methodology and maybe even copy and paste it and go get into the Dominion voting system. There's holes in that system that have been known about, well, since twenty sixteen at least, in fact, one of the participants on that panel said that that's how they hacked the state of Arizona voting website.

So the media news programmers don't want you to have that bit of information, they don't want that to enter into your calculus. So when the president does a 45 minute presentation and he features, by the way, some some data from my friend Justin Hart, who's just an independent data analyst, he and a lot of other people have looked at the voting data and said no. Twenty five thousand votes taken from Trump here, twenty five thousand there, twenty five thousand here taken from from from President Trump and given to Joe Biden.

That's algorithmic. This is an algorithm.

When that's not in people's calculus and they hear these claims as filtered to the media, they think, oh, there's that conspiracy theory. Like if you tell your friends, are you sure you're positive? Test is positive. Oh, come on. Oh, are you going to believe these conspiracies? The president deserves great credit. For forcing their hands. To get this desperate to make these many obvious mistakes, but it is this audience who knows these things, if, God forbid, there is a Biden presidency, if God forbid that happens and it looks like it might.

We have an indelible duty to the truth. We have an indelible duty to continue to seek it and to promote it and to present it to people. Let me give you another example. Teen suicides are through the roof. Pray for our children, pray for our teens and parents with kids who have mental stability challenges, pray for people who prior partners didn't have those challenges, they're shut down. And yet there's this. There's a new study in Science Direct that shows that people who live with their grandkids have exactly zero percent greater chance of getting the covid flu.

Repeat that. In families where the grandparents live with kids who attend school, there's no increase in getting the covid side by side. Were families with kids and grandparents in the same home and the kids do not attend school, there is no difference. The kids are not giving the covid to their grandparents. And yet, if you get your so-called news, which I spell in the case of CNN and MSNBC and the like, I spelled that in Ozzy like BU's.

You're being made drunk on disinformation and it helps the forces of the lockdown, like the hiding of the Hunter Biden story, helped the forces of big government and the lockdown because big government and big business, they're not locked down. We are locked out. It's fascinating that all of the selective information, all of the propaganda of silence benefits that one side, it's up to us. If, God forbid, President Trump doesn't have a second term, it is up to us to continue to push for these things.

We will not accept what they want us to think of as a new normal. We demand actual normality because we are born free.

United States citizens, not subjects taught Herman in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.

It's Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh on the EIB Network. We were just talking about this really tough time for families. And one of the best things you can do for your family is to preserve, share great memories. Many of those good times get shared in pictures and videotapes, old films. When you use legacy box to digitally transfer them, you make it really easy to share those again. Rush Limbaugh loves his company Legacy Box.

Well, the holidays are fast approaching and some of you may already have been deeply immersed in holiday parties and so forth. And when you get together with the family, you know what's going to happen. Somebody's going to start snapping pictures, videos, probably everybody is because everybody has a phone. Now that takes instant video, instant photographs, very, very high quality audio as well.

And you know what's going to remind you? It's going to remind you that your family has got a bunch of those same kinds of memories on media. Nobody can watch anymore. Family got together back in the 80s when VHS and Betamax were big, may have to go back to the 70s for that.

Some people may have slides from slide projectors or Super eight film, whatever it is, as you're making memories of current family events, you're going to realize it's all kinds of old family get togethers that you have films and photos and stuff and you can't watch anymore. Well, now you can if you have a bunch of old stuff on VHS or Betamax or Super eight film or if you're my dad was big on slides. He loved slides in the projector and clicking through them and explaining the picture.

Quality was great and slides and a big projector. But who's got that anymore? Nobody. So what do you do? Legacy box, dot com slash rush. That's the website. These people will take all that old stuff that you can't watch anymore and they'll transfer it to DVD or thumb drive or a downloadable file or cloud server somewhere however you wish it.

So they send you the legacy box. It's shielded and protected so that whatever you put in there will not be damaged in transit. Two weeks later, all of it comes back to you, however much it is high speed dubbing, maintaining original quality on thumb drive or DVD that you can then categorize, copy, duplicate, give to anybody. Plus the stuff will stay forever. It won't disappear on formats you can't watch or use anymore. Legacy box, dot com, slash rush.

And right now you can save 60 percent off the regular price. That's even better deal than normal. Normal. It's 40 percent now, 60 percent off legacy box dotcom crash. And a lot of you got these old things and you keep thinking you're going to do this, transfer yourself someday. You won't take too long. You don't have the equipment legacy box, dotcom slash rush. They do.

And they'll do it inside of two weeks. They get it back to you. Thank you, Rush. Appreciate that. We've been talking today about a series of selective bits of information that the media, the news programmers are programming people to have and programming people to believe. Meanwhile, they they they want to criticize the president doing a 47 minute presentation of putting his facts on the table. Here's his data. Here's his selection of anomalies.

Here's his selection of dead people who voted or ballots that shouldn't have counted or more ballots being returned than were mailed out. An entire series of things that in a sane world would cause anybody to say, hey, we should probably look into this. Right, because maybe we don't want half the country now completely discounting the elections. I can't overstate how important that is that the Supreme Court to take this case and whatever, however it arrives, that it be done on video and I mean live.

I mean, so the American people can watch it. And I mean, Close-Up looks at the evidence in Close-Up, looks at people answering questions about this because what swings in the balance? Is if voting isn't real, what what then is the alternative that people have? So I think it is absolutely incumbent upon the president to press this issue, particularly been, you know, taking into account what's been done to him. And I always want to remind people that what's been done to him is actually being done to you, that if we tried half the things the FBI did, you know, in in pursuing the ability to spy on the president, I tell you this factually.

If you go to court for a traffic ticket and you present false evidence to a judge and the judge says, hey, where'd you get this? And you say, oh, I had someone forge it. Judges say what, but just there's a guy I know who's really good at forging stuff, so I had him forge it. You could be there for a forty seven dollar traffic ticket, you are going to jail. If you watch. And we watch as powerful people get away with lies of the magnitude that they told about President Trump to get to us in the vote that you guys did for the president of the United States.

We become a low trust society. Low trust societies sink quickly because the dynamic is this most people don't follow the law because they're afraid of getting caught breaking it. Most people follow it because it's a societal norm. So we need to thank the president for continuing to fight and we need to pressure the Supreme Court to let them know we know not taking the case is also making a decision. It's also participating in this to talk to Cibola in Hartford, Maine.

Sibila, you're on the Rush Limbaugh program. Is Todd Hermann filling in? I hope I'm saying your name correctly, Sibila.

Hi, Todd. It's Sibila. Sibila, I apologize. Thank you for calling, Sibila.

Yes. Thank you for your zealous way of communicating the truth. Thank you. I appreciate that. I wanted to tell President Trump, don't give up the ship. Don't let go of the helm. Don't give up the ship. Stay with the ship. Guard it with your life. I want to pass that on to him and to all of us during this time, which is very difficult and lots of pressure to make changes and look to a new administration.

And it's just right now it's time to stay right in there, good and strong.

Do you get a sense that the president is weakening at all? Not at all, no.

And what do you think what do you think the best possible scenario is out of this? Do you think he has a chance to see this these? Do you think he has a chance to see these elections overturned? Do you think he will get a revote? Where do you think this goes?

I think that there's plenty of time between now and Inauguration Day and anything can happen. And I I'm a believer in God, so I'm open to anything that might happen along those lines. All right.

Well, I appreciate the phone call. And if there's any radio show that the president is going to hear, it would be the one he gets toasted for three hours. Mindblower biggest town hall in the world that I agree to the president and to the to the team. The core team we're watching. We watch the Facebook video. We're watching the evidence. And there's a lot of us and the Democrats want to make the point that we all just we want to just all scrapped.

Here's what I want. I want a full hearing of the evidence, the hearing that we didn't get around the FISA court lies. We didn't get a hearing on that. We didn't get a hearing on the Ukraine stuff. And those lies, we're not still not getting hearings on the completeness. Complete story around the covid. I demand full, complete, transparent, upfront hearings in front of the Supreme Court.

And then that way, then I can once again trust the elections. Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh.

Please remember the treasure trove that is Rush Limbaugh dotcom not to renew my Rush 24/7 subscription. My credit card respire are going to go in and renew that treasure trove of rush 24/7. Rush Limbaugh, Dotcom and the Limbaugh letter, particularly right now. You can leave a special note for Rush Rush Limbaugh dot com at the top of the page.

And I've heard him remark about how much those mean to him to be able to read these, presumably when he's on Treatment Week and hearing from you, not a dude who needs to work and not a gentleman that needs to come into work every day, given the wealth that he's built because of the value he provides to us and to advertisers. But please do leave him a special note. They're speaking of this, and I don't know if Rush is aware of this.

Barack Obama. It's come out and said Russia's right, and this has been years in the making. I mean, when I read this, my eyes popped for four for Obama to say an Obama style that, well, the facts show that Rush Limbaugh is a is true to your left. Right. No, he did, Rush has told us for years Democrats can't run. As what they really are. And so they put on this facade, while Barack Obama has said Russia's right, don't go out running on defund the police.

Politico reports this, that it is Obama's opinion that the defund the police movement, the anti cop rhetoric, and it's, by the way, not just rhetoric, is what lost them House seats. And God willing, this, you know, allows Republicans to hold the Senate in these state legislators, legislatures. And how many seats is in in California now that this red wave has taken out four Republicans in California. And yes, I think a lot of the rhetoric has to do with this, the anti cop rhetoric, and then when President Trump won.

Oh, that's right. That was the anomaly. Everywhere else, except for these five places and then every other time of day, except for one a.m. to six thirty a.m., so it was a red wave around the country, 50 states except for five. Well, during a five hour period. And then some counting of ballots that arrived without postmarks and without signatures, but there's no reason to doubt any of this. I would tell you this. The what Obama is saying is, look, go attack, let let let Black Lives Matter, Inc.

seek to kill cops, black cops and other cops. But antifa do that work, you can just you can just pretend to have sympathy for people, but don't come out and say that we want to destroy the country. This is basically what Obama saying is, please don't communicate the fact that we intend to destroy the country. That's why, you know, with Obamacare, he showed what he intended to do. It was the death knell for private insurance.

Because remember this, particularly as you're being told, oh, did you want to fly on United Airlines? Oh, you'll need your coffee pass. You'll need to show that you've been shot up with this vaccine and that'll end there. They won't expand that program. It's not like they'll tell you to get shot up with other things that will never happen, to never expand that program. They'll never look at your body as an operating system they want to build apps on.

They'll never do that. Remember this? They control the health care. They control you. That's the golden ring. Of socialism and communism. And goodness knows, they would never leverage a flu that has been in the United States since at least December 2019 to get that done. Goodness knows they would never leverage a notoriously insecure system like Dominion to achieve such an end. Lord knows a political party that allowed riots in the street and attempts on cops lives and successful attempts to take the lives of cops, they would never stoop to the level.

Of massive election fraud using a system dominion. It's my understanding from testimony that the Dominion system doesn't even keep logs that you could audit.

So that's like saying, hey, I just bought a new car, can I get a receipt? Yeah, we don't we don't do receipts. Can I get my name on the title? No, we don't put people's names on titles, so if I drive the car off the lot, what's to stop me from getting arrested? Oh. It's very much like that, let's talk to J.R. in Austin, Texas. J.R., you're on the Rush Limbaugh program.

Is tournament filling in? Hi, J.R..

Hey, thank you for taking my call. Appreciate it. Love your show.

My pleasure. Thank you. Russia's show is Russia's show. Let's be clear about.

That's a show. That's good. Of course it is. And best wishes to him because I'm just I'm a supporter of Donald Trump and very frustrated with the election results. But I'm also frustrated with when people talk about it, what is fact versus fiction? What is fact versus an opinion as far as what is real evidence? And one of the points I've heard is that there's no way Joe Biden could have got 18 million votes. He didn't run. He's a great candidate, et cetera, et cetera.

And I would put forward the counterargument. I think there is at least 80 million people out there that really dislike Donald Trump for whatever reason. But they went to the voting booth and said, I'm going to vote for anybody who's running against Donald Trump because I don't want him in the office any longer. I just want to see what you think about that.

Well, you know, I think that obviously there's people with Trump Derangement Syndrome and then there's people who just have honest disagreements with Trump and and they're not deranged and they're those people. But let's you and I run through a thought exercise together. So the United States election night, we're seeing the reports come in and the president is leading in all of these key states. And so those people who hate the president are outnumbered by the people who are either voting for him or, you know, love the president or can't stand Kamala Harris in her vice presidential candidate, Joe Biden's teleprompter.

So that's that's going on.

That happens all the way up until about one 30 in the morning when all those states say, hey, we're going to stop counting and then the votes come in at record proportion for Biden, some of them algorithmically, like in Georgia and Pennsylvania, Georgia with blocks of 100 votes in Pennsylvania, blocks of 2000 that appear to be algorithmic inserts.

Right. Doesn't happen in raw data in a natural sense. That stops at about six, 30 in the morning. What do you think the odds are that only in those hours did the ballots come in for people who hate President Trump and only in those cities, in those states, in those hours, that five hour block of time, what do you think the odds are?

That I think he has a pretty high. You think that could happen or you think the odds are pretty well against that? I'm against it. I think it could happen, but that's just an observation, it's logical to me what you're saying. However, what is the tangible evidence that we can show to prove that there was actual fraud? That's my concern. We keep talking about how we think things went awry. And again, an intelligent person could look at the stats and say that just doesn't look right.

But my point is, that's not enough. You really have to have evidence to overturn this election, if that's the objective.

Well, or here's what I would recommend this. I would just say this, J.R., that the stakes are so high because it's not just about is is Kamala Harris going to be president of the United States with Joe Biden as a strong assist if his if his leg holds up, if he's not, you know, playing with his dog and breaking another leg.

But it's those are just the the the odds are a republic and the belief in the republic. So I would just I would say this.

I'm I'm I'm tired of being told that we have to prove. And I think that's fine. Let's let's put that standard out there. I need to have an explanation. How does raw data form itself into algorithmic blocks? How does that occur? How is it that there are blocks of votes? I think 300 and some thousand votes came in ninety six point four percent or something. For Biden. I'm quoting from memory. How do all these all these mathematical anomalies happen?

Let's just let's let's pick just the 96 percent voting block for Biden. Where do those ballots come from? And by the way, where is the trailer of missing ballots? And in terms of these algorithmic, you know, happenings, hundred vote blocks, 2000 vote blocks. Let's go back and trace those. What were those ballots? That's what I'm looking for, is just some reasonable explanation. And I don't I don't think they can provide that view.

No, I don't. All right, then I think that we would be at the point where we need to say we need to do a redo, right? I mean, what does it ingolf? You get a mulligan, right? Is that what you get Ingolf a mulligan or a redo of some kind? So are the stakes high enough that we would do a redo?

I think either. To me, I understand everything you're saying. I don't disagree with it. You know my own perspective. But I think the way it works in courts and we're trying to get a court to opine on this, that they're saying, OK, you are coming with a challenge. You need to come with evidence that can tell me that this actually happened. You can look at the Dominion system or whatever it's called and say, yeah, we know you can you can break into it and manipulate it easily.

But did it really happen? And where is the proof that it did? Yeah, and that's what I think the latter is, what's going to come down.

OK, then just try this next time the IRS says, hey, we don't we think you earn more money, you know, than than than you think he did tell them I don't keep receipts. Say, sorry, I don't keep any receipts because this is what I understand the Dominion system does, it doesn't it doesn't keep audible, doesn't keep logs one can audit. So I think we're in a mess in that way. But the stakes are high enough that I think they need to focus on the algorithmic, the software stuff, the known stuff, and just demand answers for that.

But listen, I appreciate the call. Yeah, it's a great call. Thanks for calling Rush's show.

Thanks for the well wishes for his tournament in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network tournament for Rush Limbaugh on the EIB Network 888 222.

Wisconsin's Supreme Court has declined to hear the president's campaign challenge to the presidential election results. It is all going to lead up to the Supreme Court and for me it begins and ends this way. Was there an opportunity for fraud? Was it a created opportunity? Did the Democrats create an environment that welcomes fraud? If you are someone who is upside down in a business and you have reached this desperate point where you want to have it burned down, you want to have cars stolen, right.

Leaving him unlocked or the keys in it in a neighborhood notorious for car crime or leave the business open. Right. Do you create environments where things like this are likely to occur? Do you multiply the chances the Democrats did that? They announced it. There were those of us who are from Forestdale in voting states who have watched gubernatorial elections stolen. We know everybody knows that in Washington state, Christine Gregoire stole the election from this gentleman friend of mine, then Dino Rossi.

Everybody knows it. And the way they did it was the way we told you they would do this here. You keep counting ballots until you have the outcome you want.

How many witnesses have told us that the the the election officials had no idea how many ballots they had to count? Now, think of this. They're counting ballots, they know how many were sent out. They know how many will return. That's that's, you know, these are the envelopes counted. And you're sitting in a room and you're saying, are we done counting? We don't know. I mean, you don't know. How can you not know?

You know, how many ballots went out and how many came back, we've counted, how many are we done? We don't know. In the case of Rossie, they found new ballots nine times, nine times the last time they were in the trunk of a guy's car. Oh, I forgot I got a bunch of ballots in the back of my car, magically Dino Rossi, quote, lost, we want you. Did they create an environment for fraud?

Did they have motive? Well, we know that are there instances of instances of fraud? Yes, there are people who voted in Georgia who no longer live in Georgia, according to Giuliani in the team's. There were more ballots returned in Pennsylvania than were sent out, according to Ken Matthews, and I've seen these you know, I've seen from the secretary of state's website, I believe from from from Pennsylvania, that counts. Did that occur? OK, did.

Did people register at non addresses? Yes. I went listening to Sean Parnell, a congressional candidate in Pennsylvania, he is a he's a combat veteran, special forces who believe. And I think his team went to a retirement home and did an audit, did you vote no? Oh, well, that's interesting because 2000 ballots returned that all had the same handwriting on them. All had forged signatures, that's interesting, did fraud occur? Yes. Was there motive?

Yes. Was their opportunity? Yes. Was it created opportunity? Yes. Were there instances of fraud, yes, were there attempts to cover up? Yes, the reformatting and scrapping, as I understand it, the Dominion Machine's media reports they can't wait to get in the new machines, reformat them. Did they take efforts to block observers from watching? Yes. Did they threaten some Republican observers? Yes. Do they block the windows? I think that was in Detroit, yes.

Did they claim they were shutting down counting and continued to count? Yes. When there were not eyes on them? Is that when most of the suspicious vote counts came in? Yes. Are there instances that appear to be algorithmic vote additions that are not organic to raw data, raw data doesn't present itself in neat little 120000 vote packages? Yes, these things occurred. That's enough in my mind to say we need to investigate this. We need explanations for some of these things.

At the very least, anybody who did anything like that needs to go to jail. Prison, I should say. Rob, in Fort Worth, Texas, you're in the Rush Limbaugh program. It's Todd Hermann filling in. Hi, Rob. Welcome to the show.

Hey, Todd, I appreciate you taking my call. I just got a gut punch when you announced the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision not to hear the case today. On another note, this real quickly sounded like you said that you were a kid forever.

If I heard you on the show, you don't need to be. You've got plenty of talent, so no need to do that. Just go on your own now. Thank you. I appreciate that.

But but, hey, listen, there's a lot going on here. What you just did was something that I've been that I've been screaming from the rooftops about, which is simplify the message of what the Republicans are trying to do and the Trump team's trying to do, which is follow the law in Pennsylvania. The law was not changed. The law still states that votes have to be in by a certain time. They mailed all these ballots out. There's no law that covers that.

So if if if a if a bureaucrat of some kind, elected or not, any kind of a local official or a precinct official, state official, whatever, can change the rules. And that's going to stay in. They're going to roll that show down to Harris County, Texas. They're going to roll that show down to Dallas County, Texas. They're going to roll that show into many parts of the country and in national elections and then down ballot elections, if that stands, is over and beyond reason.

I said I just want to know I want you to get your reason.

I just want to tell you just changed my next hours monologue. Well, I'm humbled by that. I appreciate that. I'm just trying to express what I know the next steps are going to be if we lose at this. You know, you couldn't be more right.

You couldn't be more right. And I am remiss. I tell you what, Rob, in honor of you, I'm not trying to kiss up. You cost me against that. You're exactly right. My, my my next hour monologue, I'm going to try to make the case in the same way I have with the covid flu going down to facts and supposition. We're going to do that courtesy of you. That's a great reminder. The stakes are so high.

We've got to do that. Thanks for the call, Rob. During Rush show, Thottam Herman infomercial about the EIB Network.

It is phenomenal to watch the media continue to drain whatever remaining credibility anyone holds in them. USA Today did a fact check at this picture of the former Hillary Obama staffer Jen Psaki wearing a hammer and sickle hat. Fact are the claim photo shows Psaki Joe Biden's pick for press secretary and wearing a hammer and sickle hat. USA Today says are ruling missing context. However, when they had a picture of a Trump campaign person with an eagle, they said it's a Nazi shirt.

Well, OK, tournament in for Rush Limbaugh.

Thank you so much for allowing me to sit in for Rush Limbaugh. Thank you to Mr. Limbaugh himself and boasts certainly the gang in New York. And thank you to God for this gift of this day you have made for us. And it is a great time to pray for just a prayer revival in this country, because we are at that point where we need that more than ever, particularly in the spirit of truth. If I were going to make the case to put this election the results, the signs of fraud in front of a court of law.

Now, I'm not a lawyer. And I mean, that should be obvious to anybody. I'm a lawyer, but I will put this out there this way. We know that vote fraud occurred. We know that there were large blocks of vote fraud. Let's let's start with this. We know that there are people who got ballots counted who did not live in the state in question. We've got, at least according to the evidence is being presented, they say they have this evidence that this is not a hard match.

The Amistad project, I think that's the one started by the former attorney general of Kansas or at least run by him. They have hard numbers of ballots, people registered at addresses that are not, in fact, homes that are illegal to use in these elections. They have ballots, I understand it, that are from people who live out of state. There are ballots of people who voted twice. We know that there are those instances of voter fraud.

We know that in Georgia, there were two classes of signatures, one harder to, you know, prove to to compare, the other easier to compare. That created a block of votes that don't go through the same scrutiny as others. We know those and we know that to be the case. We know that there are those instances of fraud that indicate an environment of fraud that was set up. The Democrats set up environments for fraud. This is clear when you make changes to a complicated system at the last second, and it is those changes that have enabled a lot of the fraud we just talked about, these are cases that we know happened.

So we know there was fraud. We know that they tell us they can prove this, compare these ballots, et cetera, from that. Did the Democrats purposely set up opportunities to commit fraud? I would say yes, if you think about, for instance, Pennsylvania. The case in Pennsylvania is aggravating, and I'm glad to see that Sean Parnell, who's running for Congress there, is taking this to the Supreme Court, are trying to get it into the Supreme Court.

In in Pennsylvania, the mail, everybody, a ballot thing, as I understand it, is illegal, that would require a constitutional amendment. The Democrats went down the path, as I understand it, of trying to get that constitutional amendment process started, but they knew it was too slow. So they just did this with the waving of a pen. Pants, they broke the law. They set up an environment to break the law. And voters took advantage of that, Sean Parnell.

Had status suddenly because he was a congressional candidate who was affected by this, he took it to the state Supreme Court who said, oh, sorry you waited too long, which is a lot like saying if someone breaks into your house and you wait to find out if they're a burglar, they're no longer a burglar because you waited too long. So we know there were instances set up where fraud was enabled. We know that the Democrats also created circumstances.

Where fraud would be easier to commit in multiple states, we have people who have signed affidavits. That put them at risk of going to jail if they're lying. They've put full skin in the game, they can be jailed for lying because they've signed legally binding affidavits.

People saying things like, I watched pollwatchers threatened, we weren't allowed to see the ballots, we were told to get out, we had people cursing at us. In many of these states, it is illegal to threaten pollwatchers, and yet they say some of them under penalty of perjury, as I understand it, that they were, in fact, threatened. Did the Democrats have a motive to cheat? Yes, they did. Did they create an environment that invited fraud?

Yes, they did. Did fraud occur? Yes, it did. Is it just limited to the mail in ballots, et cetera? In other words, maybe they don't have to sway the elections. No, it may not have been. Was Dominion software available, was it was it connected to the Internet, the Dominion voting software, according to retired Colonel Waldron? So understand it. They he says his white hat hackers have seen the traffic indicating that Dominion software was not only connected to the Internet, but connected to countries that do not mean us well.

Oh, and end one America news network and others now have interviewed Patrick Byrne, Patrick is a billionaire, a tech entrepreneur, very smart engineer, mathematician. He also says he had a team of hackers looking into, not breaking into, but looking into Dominion's software. And they came back and said, yeah, this is a pretty easy hack. If we wanted to do that, was it compromised? Well, in 2016, there were tech experts speaking long before this is publicized at a critical infrastructure summit in San Francisco.

They described the Dominion software as very easy to get into. So easy, in fact, that amateur hackers simply copying the exploits of better hackers could probably get into it. One of the gentlemen on that panel said that he thought that's how the election website in the state of Arizona was hacked.

Did this happen and affect the elections? Well, what's what what signs do we have that it did happen? We have these this is, in my opinion, the best article about vote fraud that I've read.

And it comes from Central City News gentleman named Woody Jenkins, who is the editor of this newspaper. And it is him that goes through to look at the vote, feed the feed of data that, as I understand it, went from the voting machines to the big media like The New York Times. He shows blocs of votes in raw data coming in in twelve hundred vote blocks, so here's twelve hundred votes for Joe Biden. Here's 20 400 for Joe Biden.

Here's thirty six hundred for Joe Biden. Invoked blocks, that doesn't happen in raw data. Same thing happened in Pennsylvania, according to Woodies piece, but it was in blocks of 2000. So 2000 votes for Biden, 4000 and 6000. Does that happen in raw data? It does not. That is not a natural occurrence. And raw data, that would be very, very much like you waking up in the morning to see that they did it snowed that, say, three feet in your neighborhood, except every third house had no snow.

In fact, every third house was sunny and nice. And the kids were outside with no shorts running through the sprinklers. You'd say, oh, I guess that's natural. No, you wouldn't. Because that's not how things happen, like if you were on the beach on a deserted island and you walked up to the beach and there was writing on on the beach that said barbecue at 3:00, you wouldn't say, oh, look at that. The the whales have learned to write.

You would determine that there was a human being on the beach. Because, you know, language doesn't happen, happenstance really doesn't occur by chance. So are there other signs of this? Yes. The president, when he made his 45 minute presentation, turned to some data created by a friend of mine named Justin Hart, who has a background in politics, but it's really just a data analyst. What he does is skill set is he teaches companies how to make more money by looking at data performance, KPIs, key performance indicators.

That's what he does. He looked at the same data going from the voting machines to the big media and said, this is really strange. There's all these unnatural hockey sticks of votes, these blasts for Biden, very unnatural. This doesn't happen in raw data. Oh, and look at this. Here's some instances where 25000 vote blocks left the account, so to speak, of President Trump and went to the account, so to speak, of Joe Biden.

That's a 50 thousand vote swing. Were this were these errors, can they be explained, was this because it's connected to the Internet? Likewise, Rand Paul made the point that the president lost his lead in these five states between the hours of one thirty and six thirty a.m. when the people break into buildings when his crime committed, when there's fewest eyes possible on the crimes. Right. When did the president supposedly lose his lead in that five hour block of time?

Lastly, did they make an attempt to cover up fraud? Well, they kicked a poll watchers out. They said they were going to stop counting. They put boards on the windows in Detroit's, as I understand it. And I'd be glad to hear from the Dominion software people if you want to set me right. But I've heard enough testimony at this point that I understand that they do not have logs you can audit to go back and see. Wait, can we compare the votes?

What happened here? Are they taking steps to reformat their machines? My understanding is they are. Is there reason to believe that the fraud goes beyond that? People voting who didn't live in the state, beyond the people voting twice, beyond the nursing homes and long term care facilities where it's obvious people went back harvesting and forged people's names and signatures? Does the fraud extend up to an algorithmic basis in these five cities? In these five states where between the hours of one 30 a.m. and six thirty a.m., President Trump incurred things like seeing 300000 vote blocks come in, 92 percent for his opponent, which is a mathematical anomaly of gargantuan height.

On that basis, the basis I just described, the United States Supreme Court must hear this case. Or. They will be making a decision to tell people like you and me and 80 million people. Mind your own business. Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, it's Todd Hermann, in for Rush Limbaugh on the EIB Network. Folks still want to talk about the liberal Greg who called and sort of unfolded himself. It was his own defeat.

We'll get to that. You know, we're just talking about digital fraud in voting and online shopping this holiday season. You know, cyber hackers love this time of year. They love to try to get at your credit card information that you're sharing online. They love to get a hold of that and use it. Protect yourself online today with LifeLock. Let's let Rush Limbaugh explain this best. Now, folks, do something smart for yourself this week. Start protecting yourself and your online identity.

If you haven't already, it'll only take 10 or 15 minutes to do it. That's how quickly you can protect yourself and your online identity with LifeLock. LifeLock online identity theft protection is second to none. Now, here in a day and age where your information is stored on more company databases than ever before, you need a way of protecting yourself. And those databases are the focus of cyber thieves. I mean, it's a goldmine for them. They're not looking for you specifically.

Don't even know you. They're just looking for as many names as they can, as much information as they can get, because there's enough information on those databases for a cyber hacker to assume your identity, open up accounts in your name and start their own spending spree. You'll be left to pay the bills or at least dispute the bills and then have to contend with restoring your credit score and your good name. Who wants that now? No one company can prevent all identity theft, but I'm telling you, life locks, online monitoring systems, they work 24/7, scanning online transaction or transactions, and they look for irregular patterns in your spending, mysterious account openings and more.

They look for signs your identity has been stolen and other people are using your data. And when they see something, they get in touch with you immediately to confirm the problem. And they have perhaps the best thing of all. They've got a restoration team. They assign people if something does happen, if you do get hacked like this, they assign the restoration team to work with you and stick with you until it's fixed and resolved. There's nobody that does that sign up today.

LifeLock, Dotcom, make sure you use my name. You'll save 25 percent off your first year's plan with LifeLock. That's LifeLock dotcom promo code rush.

Thank you, Rush. You will not believe what we're going to I'm going to screen this so I can do a play by play for you a little bit here. But there's evidence out of Georgia. And I want to be able to do a play by play dramatic undertaking, but I'll give you this. In Georgia, they counted, they were counting ballots and then they decided to tell people to go home. So a bunch of people leave the room.

Out from under the furniture. Comes suitcases. Yes, what's in the suitcases? Yeah, explain it in full. Just a bit. Earlier in the program. We took a call from a gentleman named Greg who called to complain that that's me who is against the big bank bailouts and against paying them off for having driven our economy into the basement with making loans to people that people who had no chance to pay it back, which is cruel to the people, and precipitating the housing crash at such a young young guy named Greg called and he'd made the decision to take out a 5000 dollar loan because he wanted to be a teacher.

And then just in conversation, we were trying to figure out why he felt like it was our responsibility to pay his debts that he took out. He happened to volunteer the fact that that though he wanted to be a teacher, he was, quote, working at the time of delivering pizzas, but he wasn't working. He was on the phone with the Rush Limbaugh program, not, in fact, delivering pizzas, but he was on the clock. If that wasn't interesting enough, then then he said that he really regretted the eleven years ago he took out this 5000 dollar debt that he wants us to pay.

And then he informed us of the fact that the reason he wasn't a teacher, he felt was because he had an assault charge, that he was convicted of assault. He assaulted his dad. And he volunteers this to us as well by way of his defense and of course, at that point he'd sort of unwired himself, but I don't think he knew that. I think he called thought, told his friends, man, I just said everybody right on the Rush Limbaugh program.

John from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, wanted to address just that thing. John, welcome to Russia. Show has taught Herman filling in on the Rauschenbusch Show, High Tide.

God bless Russia, America and Merry Christmas indeed. Merry Christmas and God bless Russia and America.

Yes, usually at work. So I don't have the opportunity to call. I've been with Rush in 1989, but Greg motivated me to call. It's very frustrating to hear these young people requests from hardworking people to bail them out for their choice to go to school and accept these loans as argument with bailing out the farmers doesn't compare to apples to oranges, doesn't hold water. They weren't asking for the tariffs. But I had a very interesting story I needed to share in regards to Greg's call.

It's in regards to a friend who died, a self-made man straight out of the bayou whose daughter delivered a eulogy to him. Her first words were that I hated you because you wouldn't pay for my college. Her second words were, thank you. You gave me the greatest gift a father can give a daughter by helping me to learn how to stand on my own two feet. Hmm. It really impressed me and says everything that we need to know.

And I'm so sad that these kids nowadays do not know how to learn or have not learned how to stand on their own two feet. And that needs to happen for anyone to move forward. And whatever happened to ask not what your country can do for you? Yeah, well, and I would say this.

I you know, I was a little bit snarky with Greg because I'm that way sometimes when someone is wanting to reach into my pocket and force me to pay for something that they didn't consult me about. And I'm that way because I didn't have the advantage of a college degree. That was my decision. My mom would have paid for me to go to college. There's other ways I could have done it. I decided to drop out and pursue my own path in life.

And I'm I'm very blessed and I've worked extremely hard. I still work extremely hard. But I said to him and I meant it, that I hope that he will at one point accept responsibility, because if you don't accept your failures, you cannot take credit for your successes. You simply cannot say this is something I did right. This is something I earned. If you don't also say that I earned the problems that I created for myself. And sometimes, look, there's extenuating circumstances.

I don't know Greg's home life. I don't know what it was like. I don't know what his dad was like. But I do know that eleven years after the fact that that's the excuse for no progress in your life, that's a poison and it's a poison that I think it into kids heads, particularly in this society that wants to feed kids very much the line that you are either a victim or you're a perpetrator of victimhood upon others. It's a great call.

John, thank you for that's very, very impressive. Thanks for calling Rush's show and for being with Rush all these years. We just made the case about responsibility. We just made the case about personal responsibility and about group responsibility. I'm going to watch on the break this video that just came out from from Texas. And Team Trump has tweeted this. It is it's from that I say as Texas, yeah, from Georgia, pardon me, thank you about that.

It appears to show election fraud, vote fraud happening on video. At pretty terrific scale, and as I am watching what I understand to be ballots being pulled out from under the furniture. I'm really curious if we're going to get a statement from the Republican officials in Georgia, likely secretary of state. About this, because it seems to me we can identify the people in this as well, are we still going to hear? Nothing to look at here.

Are we still going to be told recounts are fine, that no one's making the case, that it was the arithmetic? That's the problem. We come back on Rush's show. I will do a little play by play of what this video looks like so you guys can virtually see it through audio as Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh on the EIB Network.

It is 800 to eight to 282. If you want to try to get in at the last minute. Rush Limbaugh dotcom is where he can leave a special note for us at the top of the website. I should have asked this during the break. This just occurred to me and I don't know if guests are allowed to make such requests. But Mike in New York, If we have something on the lines of a news theme, like an NBC News theme, I just this idea that I wanted to try to present because I was talking to both standardly during the break about this, just let's let's listen to a point of comparison with what we're about to discuss.

This is from Team Trump on Twitter at Team Trump, and it is from OCN, one American news network. So let me set the stage for you. This is in Georgia, apparently about eight o'clock in the morning.

According to this video and this testimony at the hearing in Georgia, a woman with the Georgia election system apparently brought in a black table to a room where they were going to be counting ballots. And she placed this table at a certain place in the room. And this is a gray on gray and silver carpeted room with black furniture, white walls. And there came a time when they said, hey, we're going to quit counting. Now, if you'll recall the monologue at the top of the hour today, I was pointing out that President Trump actually lost his lead in these states as Rand Paul has made the case between the hours of one 30 a.m. and six thirty a.m..

Suddenly, when less eyes were on things and this is where these incredible vote counts came in with all the votes, 90 percent going for Biden.

So in this room in Georgia, apparently they told people to leave. We're done counting now in that same room. A woman, the same woman, apparently, who ordered that table or brought that table in to the room. She and others go to that black table. And one by one, they pull from under that black table. Suitcases. They roll the suitcases away from the table and they set them down on this white, are this gray on gray and light silver carpet zigzag pattern.

They unzipped the suitcases and from the suitcases, they pull ballots. Multiple people do this, I think there's four suitcases in total. They then go about using the vote counting machines, which, according to the testimony apparently in this in this audio, can count 3000 ballots an hour and there's multiple machines. Apparently, this goes on for a couple of hours. How many votes did the count? Where did they come from? Why were they in suitcases?

Why did they wait until people left the room? Did they count the same ballots multiple times? Could it be that if there's four machines, 3000 ballots per hour, there could be 24, 25000 ballots counted multiple times? What percentage did those votes count for Biden? What was it, was this one of the cases where 90 percent of the votes counted for Biden? Did this happen in that magic period of time where the president lost his lead? I will remind you.

And I think it was 2004 in Washington state, the Democrats stole a gubernatorial election and everybody knows it. They did it with found ballots. They did it is every time they counted. They came up just short. Of a corrupt Democrat named Chris Gregoire. Actually, she's Christine when she's running for office, she's Chris when she's in office. At one point during the counting, the lady running the counting, according to media reports, as I recall, said, OK, we're really close.

We only need 500 and then corrected herself and said, oh, I mean I mean, it's a very close election. Let's be careful. Someone raised their hand and said, I forgot I've got ballots in the trunk of my car. And we're to believe that that person sitting there that entire time just then remembered, oh, goodness, I've got a bunch of ballots in my car. Maybe I should go get those. Do the Republicans in Georgia have anything to say about this?

Is this something that we're also to say, well, we've recounted. This is why the continual statements. From Georgia saying, we've recounted you guys, we've we've done two recounts, the counts are right. No one is saying you can't add ballots to ballots and count them up in piles. What we're saying is how did these ballots get in their. In what pile do they belong? Now, if we had an NBC News theme or something like that.

I might do a little bit of imagining. I might go into my own head, and that's a conversation that I just had with both Nordley during the break, Bo asked a question, can you imagine? Let's rewind. Back to Romney versus Obama, let's rewind, let's take this instance and let's imagine that NBC News theme playing. In your ears. Live tonight from Atlanta, Georgia, where charges of racism have a community on edge. We go now live to Atlanta, Georgia, where Mauricio Marquez is live last night outside this hotel.

There was chaos, an upset as citizens of Atlanta are asking why ballots brought from suitcases in the late hours of the evening were counted into the record, leading to a election victory, it appears, for Mitt Romney, a white man running against Barack Obama, the first African-American to be declared a national messiah.

The city's. Whitburn. The media would have already identified all four people in that room, they would have already declared the election an act of racism, they already would have declared it a redo. They would already be demanding jail sentences. They would be right now going to every Republican and saying, do you agree that this proves that Mitt Romney is a racist? Do you agree that this election should be overturned and to extend the thought exercise a little bit?

How many Republicans would have immediately folded at this point? And yet. This won't be in the mainstream. This will be another act, the propaganda side, it's nothing against 018 when American news network. Nothing against them at all. They had the vision to begin this network at the same time that the news programmers, which I spell and OSI like Bouis, the CNBC and and MSNBC and CNN's of the world, getting people drunk on disks and misinformation and, you know, keeping them lacking the oxygen of fresh information.

OK, and is airing this. It's not being aired on CNN. These hearings are not being aired, to my knowledge, but they've started doing this. I don't even know that Fox is one of these. This information you now have. Because OCN tweeted it and because the president's team grabbed it and put it out. Is this cause? To count again, or is this cause to stop everything? And figure out how ballots like this ever made it into a room where they could be counted, what is the chain of custody?

The ballots are evidence in a dispute, what is the chain of custody? Where were they that they were put in the suitcases? Are these some of the ballots from the missing truck trailer? And mind you. There's a rumor going around the media is not showing the president's presentation of this, they're also not showing the testimony of Americans like you. Who are saying in my gut. Things aren't right in my gut, there's too many anomalies. We went through the very specific instances of fraud.

We know this looks to me to be blatant fraud. In a fraud, we suspect. This is the video Supreme Court. That people will remember, if you don't hear this case, people will remember you weren't curious about this. That's what they'll remember, you need to hear this case. Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, Todd Hermann in for Rush Limbaugh on the EIB Network, and Joram in Clinton, Utah. You're on the Rush Limbaugh program.

Thanks for checking in. They get your name right, John. Yeah. John Joram, appreciate you calling. Yeah, no, I'm just calling them out, the pizza man, and I'm not a suspect of that, just a guy trying to provide for his family. But, you know, he said you were getting him riled up and then he got me riled up. So I'm a college student. I work 50 hours a week. I donate blood.

I have a couple of sidekicks that I do to bring it in. And I'm not taking out that. I'm not doing those things. So, you know, if I can I don't feel like the guy sitting next to me, my classmates can just go out, you know, live the college experience to do kind of whatever they want with no responsibility. And then just, oh, hey, you know, this is the generation that everybody gets a trophy.

So we're just going to give you this free pass, give you this freedom. Hey, hit the real world. But that's not the real world. We've got to quit teaching kids this that they can just get a free handout no matter what they're doing. Responsibility's got to hit somewhere and. Right. I'm living it. I'm doing it. So why should you ever be held to a different standard?

Right. And there were people someone just hit me up on Twitter saying that they felt I was a little bit rude talking about Greg. And I asked if they heard the call and etc. and what I'm trying to get across to Greg, is that you you called he called us and called me and said, first of all, I know what you think about this or that. No, you don't. Which is very indicative of this of this, you know, culture of young people that, oh, you are on Rush's show and so you are begging.

And college students. No, I wasn't. I'm begging on Joe Biden and Kamala Harris by wiping out an economy, by going and bailing out big college doesn't need to be bailed out. That money's not going to go to Greg. That money's not going to go to the people with the loans. That money, it's simply shifting. And what we're doing is you're going to big college that has some liability now because these loans are outstanding. They may not get paid back because it doesn't sound like Greg is right now in the state of mind to pay it back.

And we're shifting the cost over here. So it's not just the college students that get bailed out, it's also colleges. And this is the biggest scam going when you look at these colleges with their climbing walls. And at the University of Washington, they have a whole lab of video games where you can go get a degree playing video games, not designing them, playing them so you can go be an eSports, quote, athlete, etc.. You see that the luxury that they put these kids in these dorms, there's these contests to get these kids to go into this, you know, high tech woom that's like a rewarm the secondary womb to be go enclosed in this luxury.

And this is a cost shifting to big college so they can continue to play that shell game with us. So let's not pretend like that money is going to the students. Right. The money is going to big college. It's a payoff to the big college unions and it's a grift, right? When you look at the endowments of these colleges and the amount of money they have. And that was just a carried interest, literally just the interest they earn on their endowments.

They could legitimately pay their staff and their groundskeepers and bring students in. They're at no charge with their own money given to them voluntarily through endowments. So that's, I guess, my my my greater point in this dream. Where is Clinton, Utah? Is that a little bit rural?

A little bit. Not too much. It's just west of Hill Air Force Base. Okay.

So I actually know. Right, right. That is a lot of family from Utah and still down there. So thank you for the phone call, Joram. I hope I'm trying to get that right. Appreciate the phone call. Thanks for joining us on Unrushed Show. Let's talk to Greg in central California, Central California coast. You're on the Rush Limbaugh program. Another Greg joins us Greg. Well, from the Rush Limbaugh Show has taught him and filling in.

Yeah, I was on the phone, so I didn't hear all the other conversations about the first crack that called in. But one point that I want to make that liberals tend to do is they tend one thing that he said to you that I found kind of offensive was he said, you know, it seems as though the forgiveness of this loan makes you as a conservative against the little guy. And I just remember during 2009, when we had that that bank crisis, the Obama Biden administration, they bailed out the banks.

They didn't give money directly to the people that were hurting like Trump did during this last one. Right. So, you know, the forgiveness of all these student loans, this is going to be, you know, huge for the banks. They're going to be making hay on this because they're going to get all these loans that are, you know, going to be tough to collect off their books. Yep. So this is going to be not only, you know, it's going to be huge for the big banks and and then they can accuse us of not being for the little guy.

So I just find it really interesting the way this is being played out.

It's a kiddie shield. I mean, they're using the young people as a kiddie shield to get more money out of us and. Big banks and and lots of big organizations, they've learned, hey, we're going to be hard core capitalists with, you know, rock ribbed capitalists when it comes to the profits, don't you touch our profits. But, man, we need to figure out ways to socialize our losses like the big insurance companies have done, etc.

. And that's exactly great point. Greg, thanks for the phone call. Todd Herman in for Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.

It's been a great honor, as always, to fill in for Rush Limbaugh. Todd Herman, you can hear me usually the morning show 770 in Seattle. This show couldn't happen without Brian in Florida. That was just talking to the staff team. And he said Brian just went above and beyond. So Brian gets a huge shout out today. As always, Mike and Bo Craig, thank you so much for allowing me to fill in for my radio hero and life mentor Rush Limbaugh.

Oppermann, Friday is tomorrow.

I would leave you with this thought, folks. When I do radio or give speeches I asked the Holy Spirit would fill me with words that that the Holy Spirit wants me to convey. And I'm not always successful in that. We have a lot of convincing to do, a lot of evidence, lots of apparent fraud. And I would ask maybe just a special prayer to fill this audience with the Holy Spirit ability to persuade people who must be persuaded that the spirit of truth would return, would fall upon people, would imbue us with the ability to communicate rationally to people whose minds may be opened to the notion that we are witnessing a great act of fraud.

And I'm very thankful that the president is pursuing this. And all we're asking for to say once again to the Supreme Court, just just all we're asking for is a fully transparent hearing where all the evidence is aired and we get to watch. All right. That's that's what I hope God will help provide us.

Tadamon filling in for Rush Limbaugh, open line Friday tomorrow on the one and only EIB Network.

Hi, I'm C.J. Pearson and I'm everything. The lights, young, black and unapologetically conservative generations is tired that he is tired of the cancer culture and doctor patient and tired of being told what to think. Join me each and every week as I take on the life uncensored, unfiltered and unafraid.

Listen to C.J. Pearson uncensored every Thursday on the radio. I have a podcast where you get your podcast.