President-elect Donald Trump picks the co founder of the WWE to run the Department of Education.

Linda McMahon ran the Small Business Administration during Trump's first term, but has little experience in education, and it's a department that many Conservatives want to shut down.

I'm Michelle Martin. That's A. Martinez, and this is Up First from NPR News. Fema is under fire. Some Republicans accuse the Agency of Playing Politics with Disaster Aid.

Fema essentially treats the homes of President Trump supporters as if they were homes of people with vicious dogs.

Could this jeopardize future funding for disaster relief?

And a large number of people have left the social media platform X since Donald Trump won the election. And now a smaller platform called Blue Sky is seeing a surge in users. Can it become the next Twitter? Stay with us. We've got all the news you need to start your day. President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet nominations continue to roll in, and we got one more late yesterday.

Trump has tapped Linda McMahon to run the US Department of Education, and that's an agency that Conservatives have wanted to shut down for years. She is probably best known as a co founder of the WWE, the professional wrestling company.

For more on this, we're joined by NPR's Cori Turner. So, Cori, tell us about Linda McMahon.

Yeah, she is a surprise insofar as there were a handful of education candidates out there with real conservative credentials, and McMahon is not one of them. She is co founder and former CEO of World wrestling Entertainment, better known as WWE, as you said. She's been friends with Donald Trump for many years, going back to those early wrestling days. She's also twice run as Republican for a US Senate seating Connecticut, but she lost both times. During Trump's first term, he picked McMahon to run the small business administration. In fact, when she spoke at the RNC before this past election, she talked mostly about taxes and tariffs.

President Trump is a job creator and the best friend American workers have ever had in the White House.

I think it's clear President-elect Trump really trusts Linda McMahon. She has also been co-chairing his transition team.

She is on tap to be his education secretary. What experience does Linda McMahon have in education or education policy?

Yeah, not a lot that's obvious, A. She did serve briefly on the Connecticut State Board of Education. In fact, I found her testimony after she was nominated. She told the committee she had gone to college with plans to become a teacher. She also mentioned several initiatives that she had pushed while she was running WWE, including a program to encourage kids to read. But she resigned from the state board after about a year to mount her first Senate bid. More recently, she has chaired the board for the America First Policy Institute, which supports school choice across the country. That includes letting parents spend public dollars in private schools. But it's hard to know how involved she was in that part of their pretty broad portfolio. What is clear is that she is a very successful, no-nonsense businesswoman who has a ton of experience dealing with some pretty big personalities.

Yeah, that she does, which might come in handy if she's confirmed. Then let's talk about Trump's big promise to close the Education Department. How is she going to do that?

Yeah, look, a bipartisan group of experts have told me over the past week, closing the Department is one wrestling match that McMahon probably cannot win or really any secretary. That's because the Department was created by Congress, and only Congress can abolish it. Doing that will require 60 votes in the Senate to overcome the filibuster. But here's the thing. In Trump's statement announcing Mann's nomination, he said he expects her to be a champion for school choice. It would be hard for her to do that without an education department. Trump's first Education Secretary, Betsey DeVoss, was also an outspoken advocate for school choice. She struggled to get much done nationally. That's because school choice policies tend to happen at the state level, and they vary pretty wildly. One thing McMahon could try to do is use the Department to incentivize more states and communities to embrace some school choice. Republicans in the Senate have also been pushing this new tax credit that would fund scholarships to students to help pay for private school tuition. But again, A, it's early, and it is hard to know how feasible these ideas will be, even with Republicans controlling Congress.

Mprs, Cori Turner. Thanks, Cori.

You're welcome.

The Biden administration wants more money for disaster recovery, but the agency that responds to natural disasters, FEMA, is fending off a tax in Congress.

Yes, the administration is seeking nearly $100 billion in additional funds after this year's onslaught of hurricanes, flash floods, and wildfires. Meanwhile, FEMA administrator, Deanne Criswell, spent Tuesday on Capitol Hill. She had to defend against accusations that the agency responded slowly to disasters and discriminated against some hurricane victims for political reasons.

Npr's Debbie Elliott is covering the story. Debbie Criswell testified before two House committees. So what did members of Congress pressure on?

Well, specifically, this was about FEMA's response to hurricanes Helene and Milton. Catastrophic storms, you'll remember, that struck the Southeast in late September and then early October, back to back. More than 200 people were killed, and the storms caused billions of dollars in damage. But there's one particular incident that prompted this scrutiny. A now fired FEMA supervisor directed workers who were doing door-to-door canvassing in Lake Placid, Florida, to skip over houses that had Trump campaign signs in the aftermath of Hurricane Milton. Now, that former crew lead, that's what she was, Marnie Washington, has since claimed she was following standard protocol to avoid hostility in the field, something workers did face after disinformation spread in the wake of Hurricane Helene. The focus of these hearings is whether there's a wider cultural problem at FEMA. Here's House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky.

This same employee alleged on TV that this not an isolated event, and that FEMA essentially treats the homes of President Trump supporters as if they were homes of people with vicious dogs.

This is unacceptable. Americans demand accountability.

He says this incident amounts to the weaponization of government. Comer also entered into the record another reported incident of a household in Georgia being told by a FEMA contractor that they should remove any Trump campaign material. Now, that's something NPR has not verified.

How did the FEMA chief respond?

In both the House Oversight Committee and then earlier before the Transportation and Infrastructure Panel, Dan Criiswell repeatedly denied any wider issue in the way that FEMA doles out disaster aid. She says, Marnie Washington's instruction to disaster assistance teams to avoid homes, advertising Trump was reprehensible and at odds with the agency's mission. Here's part of her testimony before the House Oversight Committee.

This type of behavior and action will not be tolerated at FEMA, and we will hold all people accountable if they violate our standards of conduct. I do not believe that this employee's actions are indicative of any widespread cultural problems at FEMA.

Now, Democrats on the panel, like ranking member Jamie Raskin of Maryland, tried to point out that President-elect Trump and his allies had pushed most conspiracy theories about the hurricane response.

Fema aid workers have been forced to work under a cloud of propaganda and lies concocted to erode public trust in FEMA. Because of this disinformation, many victims of hurricanes have rejected federal assistance, and others have even harassed and threatened FEMA workers.

We know one FEMA supervisor has been fired for ordering workers to skip over homes with Trump signs. Could there maybe be more fallout from this incident?

Well, That's a good question. Chris Welles says an internal investigation is underway, and she's also asked for an independent probe by the Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security to determine whether this was an isolated incident or whether others at the agency are also at fault. In the meantime, she says they've identified about 20 homes that were skipped over and have since sent workers to help them register for aid if they qualify. We should also note that Criswell is also named in a federal discrimination lawsuit that was filed by Florida's attorney general.

That's NPR's Debbie Elliott. Debbie, thanks.

You're welcome.

It's become known as the Exitus. Since Donald Trump won the election, at least 100,000 people have left X, the social media site owned by Elon Musk.

Musk, of course, was a vocal Trump surrogate and a major donor, and now one of Trump's key advisors. And lately, X has become overrun with posts about Musk Trump. Many looking for an alternative have turned to a site called Blue Sky.

We're joined by NPR tech correspondent Bobby Allen to hear all about it. So we know by now that Elon Musk has made many changes at the site, formerly known as Twitter. But why are so many people leaving now?

Yeah, the election might have something to do with it, right? After Trump won, many on X noted an uptick in pro-Trump content. Leading up to the election, Musk tinkered with the algorithm to give his own posts a boost, and Musk was posting a lot about Trump. But to those who are not fans of Trump, X became too flooded with Trump backers. There have always been Conservatives on the app back when it was Twitter, but users said this time around, it just stopped being a mix of views and just started being posts about Trump and posts about Musk. For some people, that was a turn off, so they went to Blue sky.

I'll admit it. When I first heard about it, Bobby, I wanted to call it Blue-ski, but I know it is Blue- sky. I know it is Blue- sky, very chipper name. I'll admit, when I log on to it, Bobby, it It looks like X. So what's different?

It does. It looks a lot like X when you log on. There's a feed of text posts from people you follow. So the look and feel remind you of X/Twitter. But the difference is Blue sky users have more choice about what they see and who they talk to. If you don't like what you see on the app, you can actually build your own feed or search a database of feeds. There are more than 50,000 to choose from, say a feed full of cat and dog photos or a feed full news only about the Los Angeles Lakers, whatever you want. I talked to the CEO of Blue Sky. Her name is Jay Graber, and she says this choose your own adventure quality of the app really puts the power in the hands of the average user.

My concern with the Internet is it's just become too controlled by a few powerful interests, and people don't have enough ability to control their own fate. We wanted to build social that's built by the people for the people.

By the people for the people. How many people have actually gone to Blue Skye so far?

Yeah, well, so far, it's pretty tiny. Graver says, Since the election, they've added a million people a day, which is a remarkable number. But overall, they have about 20 million users, which is quite small compared to Metta's X competitor threads, which has hundreds of millions, and X itself, which also has hundreds of millions. But Blue Skye A is really where all the energy is right now. I mean, celebrities, politicians, influencers, you name it, are opening accounts on Blue Skye. It is too early to say that it is the new Twitter, but Blue Skye fans are sure hoping so.

Then what, if anything, is standing in the way of Blue Sky becoming the new Twitter?

Well, right now, their staff and infrastructure are just quite limited, and they will need money to support growing, and they haven't shared a long term business plan. They have said that Blue Sky will never display advertisements, that it won't harvest users' data. Those two are usually how social media companies make money, but Blue Sky is not going to do Right now, Blue sky is just operating off of investor money. And when I talked to Graber, she told me that they hoped to do a subscription model to generate some revenue. But as it stands, A, that is the big question facing the future of Blue Sky. How in the world will it ever make money?

That's MPR's Bobby Allen. Bobby, thanks.

Thanks, A.

Eyewitnesses tell NPR that the Israeli military is using a new type of drone in its war against Hamas in Gaza, a sniper drone. For months, NPR has collected more than a dozen accounts from people who have seen these sniper drones being used in Gaza, and many say they have seen them used to shoot and sometimes kill civilians. For more on this, we're joined by NPR's Kat Lonsdorff. Kat, so why did you start looking into this?

Yeah, well, I first heard about these drones this summer. We interviewed a man named Adib Shackfa, who was in Gaza. He was telling us about an incident at the end of May when he was walking on a quiet day with his 32-year-old son, and a small drone appeared and shot his son in the head. He told us two men rushed in to help his son, and the drone shot them, too. One of those men was killed along with Shackfa's son. We know that drones are used in Gaza for surveillance and even to drop bombs by the Israeli military. But when I first heard this, my editor and I had this moment like, wait, a drone shot them? We thought maybe we didn't understand correctly, so I started looking into it.

So what did you find?

I pretty quickly figured out that this technology does exist. It's been on the market for several years, and there are a few different companies making it. Many of them are based in Israel or have ties to Israel or the Israeli military. Just so you can picture it, these are small drones with multiple rotors on the top. They look like the drones that anyone could buy at an electronics store, but a little bit bigger. Then they've got a camera attached to them so that whoever's operating the drone can see what's in front of them, in front of the drone. Then there's a long rifle are all attached, and that gun can be fired remotely. The drone is designed to compensate for the recoil of the weapon while it's hovering. I should say that NPR repeatedly asked the Israeli military if it was using this sniper drone technology in Gaza. It didn't respond to our question. But it's very common that a military won't disclose what weapons they're using, especially in active warfare. Like I said, several of the companies we found have ties to Israel, and the Israeli Defense Ministry has touted the technology in the past.

What did you hear from people in Gaza about how this sniper drone is being used?

Well, we heard a lot of pretty disturbing stories that these drones appear quickly and quietly, that they come in after airstrikes and shoot people trying to pull people out of the rubble. They come near hospitals. They come to camps of displaced people. And many people told us stories about them being used to shoot civilians, sometimes children. I talked with Dr. Mimi Syed. She's an American emergency trauma doctor who worked in Gaza recently. And she told me that she would see multiple patients a day, many in pediatrics, with single gunshot wounds to the head. Every time someone would come in, they would be brought by family. But it was my routine practice to ask what happened.

Every time, it would be a drone quadcopter drone shot.

She said she saw this day after day, people coming in from different parts of Gaza and talking about a quadcopter drone shooting from different incidents. People in Gaza talk about these drones all the time. We started noticing it after interview after interview, and it seems like they become really, really common. We asked the Israeli military about several of the individual incidents we heard about, including the first one I told you about. It said it was unaware of the incidents and said that any suggestion that Israel intends to harm civilians is unfounded and baseless.

All right, that's NPR's Kat Lonsdorff. Kat, thank you very much.

Thank you.

And that's up first for Wednesday, November 20th. I'm E. Martinez.

And I'm Michelle Martin. Your next listen is Consider This from NPR. Here at Up First, we give you the three big stories of the day. Our Consider This colleagues take a different approach. They dive into a single news story and what it means to you in just 15 minutes. Listen now on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcast.

Today's episode of Up First was edited by Russell Lewis, Cara Platoni, Nicole Cohen, Mohamed El Bardisi, and Ali Schweitzer. It was produced by Zia Batch, Nia Dumas, and Milton Givada. We get engineering support from Carly Strange, and our our technical director is Zack Coleman. Join us again tomorrow.