Editor's Note: This transcript was automatically transcribed, so mistakes are inevitable. You can contribute by proofreading the transcript or highlighting the mistakes. Sign up to be amongst the first contributors.
The Trump administration has a new rule for hospitals, don't send critical information about covered 19 to the CDC.
No one knows what to do.
And it basically confuses your response. What's the purpose of sending it to a new data system?
I'm Noel King here with Steve Inskeep. And this is up first from NPR News.
How did so many powerful people lose control of their Twitter accounts? Hackers use the accounts of Joe Biden, Jeff Bezos, Connew West and some others to ask for Bitcoin.
Also, what can Mary Trump reveal about her uncle, the president of the United States?
If you had to name one characteristic that makes him the most dangerous man, what would it be?
His willingness to tear down everything. She tells Rachel that a toxic family shaped the president's personality. Stay with us. We'll give you the news you need to start your day.
Support for this podcast and the following message come from Integrative Therapeutics, creator of Physicians Elemental Diet, a medical food developed by clinicians for the dietary management of IBS, IBD. And aside, BAEO. Under the supervision of a physician.
Support also comes from Better Help online counselling by licensed professional counsellors specializing in isolation, depression, stress and anxiety. Visit better help dot com slash up first to learn more and get 10 percent off your first month.
Who keeps track of the data that measure the pandemic?
Up to now it's been the CDC, but the Trump administration is now telling hospitals to send that information to a new database at the Department of Health and Human Services. The change will have big implications, and it's baffling health officials because this is data like the number of cases that officials and really all of us are using to decide how we respond to the pandemic.
NPR's Ping has been reporting on this change for NPR. Good morning. Morning, Steve.
So what was this system and what is it supposed to be now? Yeah.
Well, since the beginning, Steve, of the pandemic, hospitals have been reporting this information directly to the CDC. It's been things like how many covered patients they have and how many beds are available and whether they have enough masks and gloves and ventilators. And suddenly this week, a lot of hospitals got an email from the American Hospital Association saying, don't report this information to the CDC anymore. Instead, it's going to go into a new system set up by a private company that writes the state directly to HHS or as a second option.
Hospitals can also send the information directly to state health departments. But either way, CDC will stop getting this data directly. And a lot of people aren't happy about it. We spoke with Dr. Georges Benjamin, who's director of the American Public Health Association, and he's worked in a lot of health emergencies.
One thing that I've learned is never, ever, ever change process in the middle of a disaster. It does not go well when you do that. No one knows what to do. And it basically confuses your response.
OK, so given that, why change over to this private company in the middle of a pandemic?
Well, HHS issued a statement saying that the CDC is reporting system was slow. And CDC Director Robert Redfield said yesterday that there's a need to modernize their data collection systems. But the timing for the move is unclear. And recently, the Trump White House has been openly critical of the advice that they're getting from federal scientists. So some researchers, like epidemiologist Soska Popescu from University of Arizona, says it looks like it could be part of a pattern.
It's really hard not to see this as some kind of interference or like snub at the CDC. It's hard not to see it that way. And I think with so many concerns over politicization of data right now, this is concerning.
And she also says the timing for the change is awful, as many hospitals are really struggling to handle their covered cases right now.
Do people at the CDC think they have been snubbed? Well, you know, it's hard to get particular comments from within the CDC. But I did speak with Dr. Gino Pollack. He's been with the CDC for 36 years. And his title is Surveillance Branch Chief for the Division of Health Care Quality Promotion, which is that group that's in charge of getting and analyzing that hospital data. And he doesn't necessarily say there's snapped, but he said that their data collection system wasn't slow.
It's processing data just as quickly as any of the other reporting methods. And he says the CDC has longstanding relationships, the hospitals, and they have a lot of experience analyzing that data, too. And he's just not sure that the new system will be able to replicate what the CDC does.
They stood up relatively recently and they don't have the track record, the expertise that we're able to provide.
And another big concern that others in the public health community have is whether the state is going to be publicly available. So here's Dr. Shah. He's a global health professor at Harvard.
We absolutely need to see a commitment from the administration for transparency and making sure that that data and information is public and verifiable.
The administration says we'll be posting the data on an 80 gess platform that CDC will still have access to. And the data reporting change just went into effect yesterday. OK.
So we'll have to see how it works. NPR's Pinkwashing. Thanks so much. Thanks, Steve.
Some of America's most prominent Twitter users were hacked yesterday. If you happen to be on Twitter, it looks like Barack Obama. Jeff Bezos, Apple and Uber had all suddenly decided to tweet about Bitcoin. It definitely seemed scammed me. And it turns out it was. So what's Twitter doing to secure itself now?
NPR's Bobby Allen on the line. Bobby, good morning. Good morning. How did this happen for people who did not witness it themselves on Twitter as it unfolded?
So a tweet started making the rounds saying if you send money to an anonymous Bitcoin address, you'll get double the money back. It was pretty obviously a scam right now. But then a version of this message was shared by some of the richest, most famous people in the world. Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Konya West. And it was being tweeted by major corporations like Uber and Apple. And suddenly it became clear that hackers had hijacked hundreds of high profile Twitter accounts in what turned out to be a very coordinated and, frankly, stunning fashion.
Yeah, Twitter ended up having to freeze the accounts effectively of a whole bunch of prominent people to prevent more hacking. Eventually, they unfroze them. But do we know who is behind this?
Twitter says hackers targeted employees with access to sensitive internal administrative systems. But we don't know how involved those Twitter employees were in all of this and much about the hackers at all, who they are, where they're based, what their motive is. It's all unknown. Some on Twitter followed these scammers links shared by Basso's, Obama and Konya and transferred Bitcoin hoping for a payday. Of course, Bitcoin transactions are irreversible and very anonymous. And since they're nearly impossible to trace, the transactions won't leave behind many clues.
I asked Mike Schappell if he had any ideas about who might be behind this hack, and he would know he's a former National Security Agency computer scientist. And here's what he had to say.
There wasn't like a huge political or strategic motive here. So that makes me think it was probably not a foreign country or some kind of force like that that was conducting this attack. And it's just somebody out to make a few bucks.
And the hackers did generate some income. A public record of the Bitcoin transfers shows that more than one hundred thousand dollars was sent to the hackers who really could have done something a lot more dangerous by gaining this type of access.
Well, that's what I'm thinking about, Bobby. A lot of journalists follow Twitter. Twitter can drive what's in the news media. A certain president of the United States says things on Twitter all the time. What he says can change the stock market. So is the platform still vulnerable?
That is the big question right now. Really unsettling to security experts is something Twitter said, which is they are looking into other malicious activities the hackers may have committed, which means this investigation is not over. Did the hackers access other high profile accounts? We don't know about that. They access private messages. Do they have information that they're withholding but planned to release at a later date? These are all big question marks. And some of the accounts hacked had multiple layers of password protection on account protection.
And that just added to the shock of how exactly did hackers get in to these accounts. Data privacy lawyer Tim two. He says if it is proven that someone inside of Twitter voluntarily handed over administrative controls to the hackers, then Twitter has a serious problem.
It shows that there's some sort of systemic failure within the company to guard the most basic element of the security, which is to make sure that you have backstops and checks on employees going rogue.
What should Twitter users do now? Yeah. You know, security experts tell me that any ordinary user on Twitter should use enhanced security protections like two factor authentication. But I think what this hack shows is no matter what steps you take to protect yourself online, nothing is foolproof.
NPR's Bobby Allen. Thanks so much. Thank you.
President Trump's niece says her new book is not about revenge. Yeah, I married Trump, wrote a memoir about growing up in the Trump family. She makes damning observations in the book that questioned the president's fitness for office. She writes that his family propped him up for their own financial gain. She says her grandfather is 100 percent responsible for her dad's death and is the reason she was disinherited.
But despite all of that talk of dysfunction, she says this book is not about payback.
Rachel Martin talked with Mary Trump about what the book is about. Good morning, Rachel. Hello. What did you learn about the president? You didn't know.
So what we see for the first time, Steve, is this picture of how Donald Trump came to be.
And we see this picture from someone actually in the Trump family, which is a first. Here's what Mary Trump said about what makes her uncle so dangerous.
His willingness to tear down everything. People, institutions. Family in order to get what he wants. Where does that come from? That comes from my grandfather. Donald learned from a very young age that in order to survive in my family. He needed to be what my grandfather referred to as a killer. So Mary Trump says this happened because of how Donald and her father, Freddie Trump, were raised. She said Fred Trump senior emotionally abused them. He neglected them when he did pay attention.
It was only to belittle or bully. She says that drove her father to drink. Alcoholism would eventually contribute to his death. And she says her grandfather, Fred Trump, is to blame for that.
I appreciate hearing her voice. The pace, choosing every word carefully. But I'm thinking about the story. If the father was that abusive. How did the other son, Donald Trump, become the face of the Trump family business?
Right. So according to her, Fred Trump senior eventually saw enough of himself in Donald that he decided to prop him up time and time again, even when it wasn't necessarily good business. He tried to bail them out when Donald Trump's casinos were failing. He gave Donald a lot of second chances because Donald Trump actually had something that Fred Trump didn't have. He had charisma, he had charm, and he had been able to create and perpetuate a narrative around himself about being a successful businessman, something Fred Trump could never do.
All that despite Donald's moral failings. Mary Trump says the family built him up because to do otherwise would have been too big a risk for their own fortunes. It's important to note, Steve, Mary Trump and her brother were left out of the family fortune, she says, because her grandfather thought of them and their father as a disgrace. Sheena Brothers sued the family over the will. And it caused a really deep rift that has never fully healed.
Well, having known all this for years, why would she speak out now?
I asked her that. And she said she didn't believe it would have made a difference. Before that, no one would have listened. During the campaign, she says criticism of her uncle just seemed to fall away from him. I was only one person. I could easily have been painted as disgruntled, disinherited, embittered niece, she told me.
And then she anticipated another critique.
What I would say to people who would say I'm doing it for revenge is no. To me, this is justice.
She says she wants America to have the full picture of Donald Trump to inform their choice in November.
Rachel, thanks for that. You're welcome. Rachel Martin conversation with Mary Trump, who says she's voting for Joe Biden. And that's a first for this Thursday, July 16. I'm Steve Inskeep. And I'm Noel King. And we'd love it if you start your day here with us again tomorrow. And we know the news doesn't stop when this podcast.
And so you can follow us on Twitter at first or you can turn on a radio show, Morning Edition, which Noel and I co-host with Rachel Martin and David Greene. It's on your NPR station. And you can also find podcasts, local news, the latest headlines and so much more. And take NPR everywhere with the NPR one app, which is in your App Store. From Mesan to Becky to Karen, our very own Karen Napat, Karen, Karen Grigsby Bates shares the evolution of the nickname for a certain kind of white woman.
I'm looking forward to the next iteration. I want my name back. That's coming up on NPR's Code Switch.