Happy Scribe Logo


Proofread by 0 readers

President Trump says he is sending federal agents to police American cities. He says he wants law and order. Local leaders see it differently.


We're not going to have tyranny in the city of Chicago. I'm David Greene with Rachel Martin.


And this is up first from NPR News. Two labs say they are getting closer to making a corona virus vaccine a reality, but many hurdles remain, including getting a dose to everyone who needs one.


There are still billions of people who would be left without a vaccine. How much longer will this take?


And a group of Florida teachers sues state officials over an order that says they must return to the classroom five days a week. The teachers say it's unconstitutional and unsafe.


It's dangerous to teach. It's dangerous to teachers. What could this mean for schools across the country? Stay with us. We've got the news you need to start your day.


After camouflaged federal agents arrested protesters on the streets of Portland, Oregon. President Trump now says he may be sending more federal agents to other U.S. cities.


This is what we heard from the president yesterday at the White House. Well, I'm going to do something that I can tell you because we're not going to let New York and Chicago and Philadelphia, Detroit and Baltimore and all of these Oakland is a mess. We're not going to let this happen in our country. All run by liberal Democrats.


Now, President Trump has made empty promises before, but we should say the Chicago Tribune is reporting that plans are already in the works for Chicago.


Gregory Pratt is one of the reporters who broke the story for the Tribune and he joins us now. Good morning, Gregory. Good morning.


What have you learned about these plans? So there's a lot in the air Boole we do know is that the administration has plan to send roughly 150 Homeland Security investigators, which is a special wing of ice that doesn't do immigration but works on serious investigations into things like human trafficking. And they're planning to send about 150 of them into Chicago, where I think they'll be working for the Justice Department. And their mission is going to be to, quote, unquote, combat violence.


But it's not clear what that means exactly. President Trump is in ministration, have been vague about it. And even after we broke the story that they were going to send these agents, the mayor's office said the feds hadn't shared any definitive plans with the city, which has raised some concerns, especially after what you saw out of Portland, where federal agents reportedly snatched protesters off the streets and threw them into unmarked vehicles without explaining why they were being detained.


Right. It's so interesting to that. You say that the chain of command is unclear, that no one's really sure who they're reporting to if it's the Justice Department or someone else.


I mean, can you talk, Gregory, about how this fits into President Trump's larger criticisms of Chicago? Because that's a city that he has targeted in his rhetoric for many years, right?


Yeah. And, you know, Mayor Lightfoot often says that he's been using Chicago as a punching bag from the beginning of his administration in this first week. Trump tweeted, Send in the feds and cause the minor panic. But until now, he hasn't done it yet. So right now, what's different and what's hard to ignore is that we have an election in November. Trump is down in the polls and he is crafting a law and order message, particularly during the national protests and civil unrest over the police killings of Brianna Taylor and George Floyd.


Now, that said, crime is up in Chicago. Shootings and homicides are up substantially. So he's not wrong about that, even though people here express a lot of skepticism that he actually cares about the problem.


So tell us more about what local leaders are saying, in particular, the mayor, Lori Lightfoot.


Well, Mayor Lightfoot, yesterday, before we broke our stories, said she has general concerns about the possibility of Trump sending feds to Chicago based on what had happened in Portland. And here's what she said.


We don't need federal agents without any insignia taking people off the streets and holding down, I think, unlawfully.


So she also said that we won't have tyranny here on the streets of Chicago. So that's some real pushback.


All right. We will keep following it. Thank you for your reporting. Gregory Pratt with the Chicago Tribune.


OK. The race for a coronavirus vaccine is on two different groups of scientists say they might be getting closer to an answer right.


A research team in the U.K. is starting to lay the groundwork for a major U.S. trial of their vaccine, while another team also has a formula that is looking promising. But we should make clear the questions remain here.


NPR science correspondent Richard Harris is with us this morning. Hi, Richard. Good morning. What do we know about these vaccines so far?


Well, the two that I'm talking about today includes one that's being developed by scientists in China. And that study that they're reporting involves more than 500 volunteers. The second is out of the University of Oxford and that one recruited more than a thousand people for the early phase of testing, which is what they're reporting on now in the medical journal The Lancet. I talked to now our bars of at Johns Hopkins University who had a chance to review these two reports in detail.


So far, everything we've seen has been encouraging. And most importantly of all, there's not been any severe any serious, I should say, adverse events.


Some people did get a kind of the kind of reaction you get from a vaccine, like a fever, a fatigue, a little bit of pain at the side of the injection. But Bartolome says those are to be expected.


So, I mean, do we know if they actually work? Well, we don't know anything definitively yet.


One hopeful sign is that most people who got the experimental injections developed antibodies against the Corona virus and those antibodies actually neutralize the virus, at least in the lab. Brazil was also encouraged to see that people's immune systems revved up to produce custom cells called T cells that targeted the corona virus and then may turn out to be really critically important.


We don't quite know enough to really about coronavirus immunity, but it may turn out that that's a really important part. Its protection against the growing divide, particularly in terms of the longevity of in your response.


It's really important to have an immune response that will last for a reasonable period of time, say at least a year. And that is not assured because some people do have a fleeting immune response to related coronavirus. That means they could get sick again and the vaccine really wouldn't stick.


So as you suggested at the top, there are lots of other vaccines in the works right now. What makes these two different?


Well, I would say that they are ahead of the pack, at least at the moment. They've been tested on a lot more people than, say, the Madona vaccine, which is a leading candidate here in the United States. But, you know, this is new scientific territory. So the worry is any potential vaccine candidate could falter along the way. I talked to Adrian Hill at the University of Oxford and asked him hypothetically, what could go wrong with the vaccine that his team is developing.


And he said he's worried that it might not stimulate a strong enough immune reaction, even though the results in the lab look good. He also worries about the potential snags in mass production of the vaccine. And we won't know if that works until it's been really run out and tried in tens of thousands of people who are at risk for getting infected. To see if it lowers their risk. But one thing that the people at Oxford are doing is they've teamed up with this drug company, AstraZeneca, to test this out in a large scale, like 30000 people here in the United States.


Do we know the timeline for that? I mean, what are the next steps here?


He says that could have results in October or maybe even earlier. And, you know, manufacturers are already thinking ahead about how to ramp up production to make two billions of this vaccine available within a year.


Two billion doses is an aspiration. I hope we can do that. We're not at all sure we can. But even if we succeeded, we'll AstraZeneca in doing that. There are still billions of people who would be left without a vaccine over the next few years.


So it's good that there are a lot of companies out there pressing ahead, using a variety of strategies to try to produce one of these vaccines.


All right. Cast a wide net. OK. NPR's Richard Harris. Thanks, Richard. Anytime.


Florida teachers are headed to court. That's right. They are suing Governor Ron DeSantis, who has ordered them to return to classrooms full time. The teachers and the two major unions that are supporting them say that forcing schools to reopen in a pandemic is not only reckless, but also against the state constitution in Florida. State officials say they have a mandate to educate children. All right.


Let's talk about this with NPR education correspondent Corey Turner. Corey, so teachers there saying it's too dangerous to go back into the classroom.


Is there really no flexibility for those kinds of concerns in Florida?


There is some flexibility in this order, but not nearly enough, teachers say. Rachel, the fight started about two weeks ago when the state issued this executive order, which basically requires schools to offer in-person instruction five days a week for any family that wants to send their child to school. The state argues that, you know, getting kids back into classrooms is best for kids, especially vulnerable students with disabilities. Kids were food insecure. Maybe they're living with essential workers.


Here's Governor DeSantis yesterday.


We don't want folks to fall behind and we really, really want to focus on the best interests of our students and giving the parents the maximum amount of choices.


Now, there is some room in the order for the input of public health officials. But plaintiffs are clearly worried that schools are going to be forced to reopen before it's safe and without the resources they're going to need to protect teachers and students.


So, Corey, walk through exactly what the plaintiffs are saying. What are their concerns?


Well, one of the plaintiffs is a teacher who contracted covered 19 back in March. She spent eight weeks in the hospital. And she and the other plaintiffs argue that the Florida Constitution requires that kids receive a safe education. And, you know, if you look at infection rates in Florida right now, they say it's just not safe. Florida is leading the nation in new daily cases per 100000 people. I just checked earlier this morning. It's not even close between first and second place.


Here's Randi Weingarten. She's the head of the American Federation of Teachers, which backed the lawsuit.


None are the countries in the developed world that opened up opened up work with Congress search. It's dangerous to teach. It's dangerous to teachers.


But if we focus in on the kids for a second, Corey, I mean, isn't there new data suggesting that the at least really young kids, they don't transmit the virus as often as older kids, yet young kids?


Also, we're fairly certain that they're not getting seriously sick in general. But there is new research out of South Korea that suggests by the age of 10, they do transmit as much as, if not more, than adults. You know, the governor and his administration are right. Being out of school is hurting a lot of kids, but it's not clear that it's safe for school to reopen in this context. Yeah.


So, I mean, let's talk about the impact, right? I mean, I imagine this is going to affect decisions across the country for school districts.


I mean, it's worth noting that the Trump administration has really held up this order as a shining example of what needs to happen. But honestly, in the last two weeks since it happened, infection rates have risen so much. We've seen Texas, the other state, with one of these big mandates. They actually backpedaled and the state told districts they could start online only for two months if necessary. And even in Florida, we're seeing some big districts say we're not opening right now.


NPR's Cory Turner, we appreciate it. You're welcome. And that is up first for this Tuesday, July 21st. I'm Rachel Martin. And I'm David Greene. We'll be back here tomorrow. Hope you join us again.


You can subscribe to us wherever you listen to podcasts and you can read us and review us and apple pie guests. Thanks so much for waking up with NPR. Your NPR station makes up first possible every morning. Support them and support us at Dony Davenports slash up first.


I'm Gen Y. The new host of NPR's One. A take what you hear on up first and dive deeper with one a. The show listens to the beating heart of America. Expect a dynamic debate that asks America what it wants to be. This is a show for those who are relentlessly curious. Join me next time on one A.