When you work, you work next level. When you play, you play next level. When it's time to sleep, Sleep Number smart beds are designed to embrace your uniqueness, providing you with high-quality sleep every night. Sleep Next Level. Jd Power ranks Sleep Number number one in customer satisfaction with mattresses purchased in store. And now, the Queens Sleep Number C4 Smart Bed is only $1,599. Save $300 for a limited time only at sleepnumberstores or sleepnumber. Com. Price is higher in Alaska and Hawaii.

We're not going to start this show by implying that gambling is a new problem or that betting on pro-sports has never been a problem. But when certain pockets of the sports world first dabbled in legalization, for instance, the New York Racing Association's legalize Betting program, it was a process.

You had to send actual certified check to them. They wouldn't take wires. There was none of that. It was a snail mail process. They would get my check, they'd put it in my account. I would have to call up and talk to a teller and say, Hey, I'd like the third race at Aqueduct, $100 to win on the three. They'd repeat it. This took an enormous amount of time to do this stuff.

Now?

This is what March is all about. This is what March is all about.

Not so much. New customers download the DraftKings Sportsbook app and turn five bucks into 150 instantly in bonus bets. Since the Supreme Court opened the doors to commercial betting in 2018, there are now 38 states plus the district of Columbia where sports wagers are legal. And it feels like there's no escaping the gaming industry's hard sell. Here's the CEO of FanDuel, Amy Howe on CNN, just before the Super Bowl back in 2023. They may bring half a million new customers onto the platform. A lot of those are recreational users we may not have seen before. There'll be more women on the platform. It gives us an opportunity to really expose them to our industry-leading product. But these days, there are rumbles of something else in the background, something not so fun. On today's episode, we're going to hear from two people who come at this issue from very different personal experiences. We'll learn what it's like to have a gambling addiction and why the lawyer who took on big tobacco has his eye on digital betting next. I'm Audi Cornish, and this is the assignment.

I'm Rex Chapman. I played basketball for Most of my life, high school, college, professionally. I played at University of Kentucky, played for four NBA teams. I retired in 2000 and immediately became addicted to OxyContin and spent 14 years on and off of painkillers. Got off of painkillers in 2014 and been cleaned from painkillers for nine and a half years. Here I am.

Is that how you usually introduce yourself? No. That's quite the calling card. Usually, you say I was big on Twitter. Okay, Rex Chapman is underselling himself here. He scored more than a thousand points in two years as a student at the University of Kentucky. His nickname was King Rex. He became an NBA player who made 40 million in salary alone, who, at the height of his various addictions, which included gambling, nearly lost almost $400,000 at a Las Vegas blackjack table. You've always been, not always, I've known you as someone who has been open about recovery.

Right. Yeah. I've always been pretty open. I don't know that I was an open book because I had so much stuff going on. I think I was just trying to distract myself from real life. But yeah, since 2014, I've realized secrets are not good for me. They're not good for me. I make sure friends and family have keys to my place, so I'm not just sleeping the day away under the covers in the bed depressed. So I've got some safeguards in place now.

I'm glad you do. I didn't know that, Rex.

Thank you.

I also didn't know gambling was part of your story. I didn't know that until I started looking into this. It's like I understood all the other things, but I didn't know how much of it... How much was gambling part of your story? When did it even start?

Gambling, I started going with my father when I was a little kid. Five, six years old to the racetrack. He would sneak off and take me and my little sister with him, and we'd have a great time. He'd give us 20 bucks. We'd have hot dogs, and weirdly, they would let little kids bet at certain windows. I could go up and place a $2 bet, and it would pay for my hot dogs and show bets for the whole day. Then I'd see him at the end of the day, and then our only rule was, Can't tell your mom where we've been. It was a little secret thing.

Also, you went up to a teller window yourself? Yeah. How old were you?

At 6, 7. What would happen, and I think the first time ever, probably, he walked up with me to his favorite teller and said This is my son, Rex, and here he is. He'll come up from time to time. That's what happened. I'd go up and place a $2 bet. I could read a racing form before I was really reading in school. It was all, I didn't realize this was gambling or something that could be bad at some point. I've never bet a sport in my life. I don't bet team sports. Why not?

I mean, for obvious reasons. But as someone who would have grown up with it so young, what was the boundary for you that you wouldn't cross?

Well, first, when you get into the NBA or when we did back in the day, immediately you had meetings with the league, and they would bring out pictures and I put them on the wall beside you of people surrounding the NBA who are known gamblers, and you can't associate with gamblers or gambling or anything. If a friend asks you, Do you think you'll cover this bread? You need to turn around and walk. We were scared to death. That's the first thing. The second thing, as a sportsperson, betting on team sports is silly. I mean, many times when the best player on the team goes out, everybody thinks, Well, yeah, they're going to lose tonight. That doesn't usually happen. There's guys sitting over on the bench that are dying to play. Right.

So there's too many variables.

There's too many variables. Here's the other thing. I remember when fantasy basketball started in the '90s, and I would come off the court and people would be yelling, You're killing it for my fantasy team, Rex. And I have no idea what this means. None. But then you would get the other end, You suck. You're killing my fantasy team. Well, that now has been replaced with, You cost me money. You cost me money because gambling is legal. People bet through bookies forever, I'm sure. But now the players really have targets on their back because, shoot, they might have a prop bet where, is Rex Chapman going to score over 10 points tonight? That adds a whole other thing into the equation. But it's It goes hand in hand. Look, the the league have decided we're getting in bed with the gambling, and there are going to be repercussions from that for the players. It's growing the pie. The players are making more money, the teams, the owners, everybody. The fans are really footing the bill for this with the gambling. My biggest thing, I was such a horse racing degenerate that in the '90s, Internet betting was not around.

It was not a thing. But in a couple of pockets of the United States, New York being one, they started basically a telephone wagering account system. You had to send actual certified check to them. They wouldn't take wires. There was none of that. So it was a snail mail process. They would get my check, They'd put it in my account. I would have to call up and talk to a teller and say, Hey, I'd like the third race at Aqueduct, $100 to win on the three. And they'd repeat it. This took an enormous amount of time to do this stuff. I cannot imagine how fast I would have blown through money if I could have been doing it on my phone. Oh, I lost $1,500? Okay, here's another $1,500.

You mentioned the idea idea of a prop. And I, in doing research for this story, saw a quote from Tyrese Halliburton, who is like an all-star guard, Indiana Pacers, NBA. And he said this, To half the world, I'm just helping them make money on draft kings or whatever. I'm a prop. And when he said, I'm a prop, I, a non-gambler, thought he meant like a symbolic prop in the game of life. Right. It turns out he was talking about what you just mentioned, a prop bet, right? The wagers based on the stats that a particular player accrues over a game. I'm reading that because of the way the online betting is developing into profitability, there is more emphasis on the individual player in their performance. So what you talked about, the fantasy league thing is about to go... The players feel it.

Yeah, the players feel it, and they will definitely feel it with the gambling. It's one thing to lose your fantasy game. It's another thing to lose $500. And that's what people are doing.

And not to be mean to sports fans, being from Massachusetts, I get it. Sports fans are intense. But they can be angry. They can be intense. There can be a toxicness that I feel it's contained ages.

I think so. The other thing is that once fantasy came around, fantasy Leagues, people were watching the games for a different reason. They're watching the player's stats. A certain portion of fans are not really watching the game for the result of the game anymore.

Or the story, right?

Or the story. So that gets lost. And so the hardest thing for me to wrap my head around with the players right now are these prop bets and the fact that gambling used to be a dark, seedy thing that all of us as children, apparently not all of us, but most of us as kids were taught, look, gambling is bad.

And you even use the phrase degenerate, right? Degenerate.

That was always parents, teachers, everybody was trying to constantly remind people, don't become a degenerate gambler. Don't do that. Well, now Kids are leaving high school, going to college, but everybody's gambling. They all have gambling accounts. They all are betting on the games. They're playing poker, they're playing roulette, they're playing anything that they can find online in their dorms. And that, to me, is just terrifying. Mix that in with the first time being gone from home. Yes, exactly. First time gone from home, you have to govern yourself. You're drinking, you're partying. It's a recipe for disaster, I'm afraid.

Part of me feels like legalization of things can be better. Is it better to owe that money to a company than someone who will come and break your legs? Break your legs, yeah. As the movies have told me. But are the problems we're seeing now, because we are seeing problems here and there, the reports, are they permanent? Or is this just a frenzy of those first few years where something's legal and it's a little messy for a while.

No, I think we're going to see something bad. Look, we already have. I don't worry as much about the pro players. What I do worry about more than anything are these college kids. Somebody, some kid somewhere, they're going to look and see, Wait, there's a prop bet on me that I don't score three points? You can just see it now. I just feel like we're sitting on the precipice of something bad.

Soccer teams in England have betting logos on their jerseys. I watch beer commercials during sports games, and I'm not an alcoholic. Are we getting too riled up about the threat here? Because not everyone becomes an addict, right? This is not to dismiss your story, but not everyone ends up where you were.

No. You're exactly right. However, they're not looking for everyone. They're looking for the five people that start gambling and the one who can't stop. And that one is me. If you're looking for me, you don't need the five others. I'm gambling enough for them. I'm in it every single day. And when I say that, I wish I could impress upon you just how lost you get. Now, for me, I have two problems. I'm a drug addict at the time at the height of my I've quit playing. I don't have any other obligations except going and take the kids to school and go to the racetrack. So I was trying to escape some other things. However, how dumb. Let's just go to when I'm in my 20s. I'm a wealthy basketball player making two, three, four million dollars a year. How dumb it is to spend every waking minute at the track stressing over $15,000, $10,000, $5,000. If I win that, it's not going to change my life. But if I lose and continue to lose, that damn sure is going to change my life. And that's exactly what happened with me.

Yeah. And people talk about digital bets now. They use it for gamification, right? Because it's just like you're playing Candy Crush or you're betting on the spread. It's all clickety, tap, tap, tap on your phone.

And you know what? You make a great point there, Audi. It's candy crush. It's what you're just betting. You just want the action. And if you got it on your phone, I can't imagine. I'd have been broke so fast if there was an app on my phone that I could gamble 24 hours a day. If I woke up in the middle of the night and there's a race going on in Australia that I can bet on in two minutes, if it's got an option to play poker or to play blackjack or to switch and sports bet, I'm sure the allure is just too great for so many people. And again, I was right there with them. And for most of my life, I didn't realize or wouldn't admit that I had a gambling pro.

I want to end on a hopeful note because you started this conversation introducing yourself using some of the descriptors of what you were and what you have done. I've encountered you a different person. That means that somewhere at some point, gambling, too, was a thing you used to do. I know this could be a long answer, but fundamentally, how do you think you got away from it or out of it?

Well, when I'm uncomfortable, normally I joke, and normally I say here, it's easy to not when you don't have any money. So I hit rock bottom. I was arrested. I went into rehab, and I had to start learning how to live all over again. One thing I had to learn was the value of a dollar. I had never really I'd always had money because I could play basketball from the time I was 16 or 17 years old. What am I going to do? I don't have a degree. I don't have anything. I have to start learning, why am I here? What's bothering me that's making me take pills, gamble, and want to run from myself all the time. And it was me. I was not happy with me. And so I had to figure out how to live and learn to not be a basketball player and find out things that I do like to do. I like going to play golf. I like music. I'd forgotten about so many of these things over the years because I was so lost in my addiction. When I got out of rehab, I was very diligent to stay clean.

I had legal issues, but I just had to keep putting one step in front of the other. Audi, I had embarrassed myself and let myself down. My folks, my sister, my friends, my family, my friends' kids who idolized me. That stuff like that. My kids, my own kids.

Because it was recorded on in the news, et cetera.

I felt like I'd really, really let people down and decided that If I'm going to do this and try to live without painkillers, then I really need to try. Just like I did, try to become a basketball player, and just like you really try to succeed at it. It wasn't easy, but man, I had so much help, so much support. When I say that, Audi, you didn't even know about some of my problems. You helping me with us as teammates at CNN Plus for a very brief period. It was just beautiful to get to know People like yourself who have been like, Hey, I'm really proud of you. Hang in there. Keep going. That stuff means something.

Rex Chapman is the author of the new memoir, It's Hard for Me to Live with Me. We're going to take a short break. We'll be right back.

We all do things our own way. And since the way that each of us sleeps is unique, you need a bed that fits you just the right way. Sleep Number smart beds make your sleep experience as individual as you are, using cutting-edge technology to give you effortless high-quality sleep every night. Jd Power ranks Sleep Number number one in customer satisfaction with mattresses purchased in store. And now, the Queens Sleep Number C4 smart bed is only $1,599. Save $300 for a limited time only at sleepnumberstores or sleepnumber. Com. Price is higher in Alaska and Hawaii.

I'm Tanya Moseley. In 1987, my sister Anita vanished without a trace. Decades later, thanks to DNA, we found her. But that's only the beginning of the story. She has a name as a new audio documentary that explores the search for redemption, confronting trauma, and healing in the face of unimaginable No Loss. Subscribe now to Truth Be Told presents She Has A Name, where every revelation brings us closer to the truth. Welcome back to The Assignment. We're talking about online legalized sports betting. For this part of the story, I wanted to talk about a kid who grew up in New York in the 1950s, Richard Daynard.

I had been what's called a radio ham. There are very few of them around today, I think, but amateur radio operator. I became one at age 10. One of the things you do is you go to monthly meetings of local groups of ham radio operators. It was in the back room at Forrester's Bar & Grill on East 84th Street. And I go in there and people were smoking. And this is not something that I had really encountered before. If I may or may not have asked somebody to stop or made it very clear that I was really uncomfortable, coughing a little bit, but they paid no attention. It It became clear that for them, smoking was normal, and if I had a problem with it, I should leave.

So a little kid says, I'm coughing. Can you stop? And it's like, Hey, kid, beat it. You're the problem. Precisely. You're the problem. He grew up to be a lawyer.

Richard Daynard, D-A-Y-N-A-R-D. Who are you with? The Tobacco Products Liability Project in Boston. We submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the six living former surgeon generals of the United States.

He was one of the lawyers who, in 1991, spoke to reporters on the steps of the Supreme Court about how tobacco companies, through co-opted research and relentless advertising, misled the public and spawned a health crisis. Now, his organization is suing DraftKings, accusing the online gambling company of deceptive promotions that induce people to use, quote, a known addictive product. With big tech blurring the lines between games, gaming, and gambling, I wanted to know what lessons he's drawn from his fight against tobacco companies and what made him think it was a fight he thought he could win.

I was always interested in consumer protection, probably because my parents subscribe to consumer reports. When I got to teaching, I wanted to teach in the area of consumer protection to protect both smokers or people who are in danger of becoming smokers and people who are exposed to second-hand smoke. And this being a law school class, we very quickly decided the answer was, sue the Bastards.

You come to understand something I found fascinating, which is that the whole process around consumer protection, in a way, was oriented around one lawsuit at a time, one person at a time. This is not to say there weren't class action suits, but you said something super fascinating, I've read, about how you came to understand yourself as someone who deals in wholesale, not retail. What did you mean by that?

When I came to Northeastern, and this was in 1969, the dean at the time had the bright idea that the way you get a good faculty, this is the 1960s, Clean for Jean, anti-war, so forth, is you say this is a school that's going to have a progressive agenda, a social change agenda. So my colleagues tended to and continued to be quite oriented into some one or another area of public interest or social change. So the work they were doing was very important work at an individual level, working with immigrants, people who had been meshed in the juvenile delinquency world and so forth. But But they're working with individuals. So when I got involved, I was not interested, really, in one-on-one. I thought it was important, but it's not what I wanted to do. Again, I didn't want to oil the wheels of commerce. I wanted to change the way this is thought about. At that point, we weren't calling this public health, but what I was thinking, what it really is, is it's the public health approach. I want to change the conditions that create the problem rather than trying to do something for each individual after they've suffered as a result of the problem.

Now you're taking on sports betting, and you're taking it on in a really interesting moment, which is when it's in its infancy in terms of the internet and legalization and the commodification of it as a business. What is important and what did you learn from your tobacco years that is helping you understand how to approach this sports betting problem?

What we're dealing with here is we're dealing with a product, actually. Rather than thinking about gambling or smoking, we're thinking about the particular thing you get on your phone, the particular app you get, the way you use it, the way that you've been induced to use it, trained to use it, hooked into using it on your phone. You're continually addicted to this product.

But as you're talking, I can see how you could very easily swap out phone for cigarette. The idea that you focus on the product itself that facilitates the addiction and what the company is selling.

Correct. Because if you smoke a pipe, it pales in comparison to the harm that gets done by smoking cigarettes. So there's been smoking. People have been smoking, but it wasn't a public health problem until it became commercialized in cigarettes in the modern cigarette. Somebody that was gambling, it was a problem.

But you think it's about to be a bigger problem?

It's a difference in kind.

But one thing I want to jump in here is that people don't see this as a crisis, and people don't see this as a problem yet. There's a excitement around it. I feel like that is very different than when you were going after smoking Back in 1985, no sensible person, no sensible lawyer or a law professor or legal scholar thought that suing tobacco companies had a chance.

Everybody knew you couldn't do it. They tried it in the 1950s and 1960s. It didn't go anywhere. Nothing happened. The cases weren't working. So at some point, I remember sitting back and saying, Okay, let me do a reality check. Am I psychotic? I'm just making this thing up because reality isn't being very nice to me on this one. But I hung in there and things turned around. So that, I think, is what's going to happen here with sports betting, only I think it's going to happen a lot faster. And the reason I think it's going to happen a lot faster is that unlike tobacco in the 1980s or in the second half of the 20th century, where it was ensconced, it was It was normal. People were used to it. There was nobody alive who could remember a day when it wasn't common, when it wasn't a normal thing to do. It got a big push in World War I, where they distributed the cigarettes with the rations and so forth, but it was normal. Whereas everybody can remember when sports betting, mobile sports betting, got started. There's nowhere where it was more than five years ago.

And in terms of I think the public reception is at best mixed. Some people are excited about it. The people they're targeting, presumably, are excited about it. They're targeting guys, principally, and guys who are young guys.

Congressman Paul Tonko, he's a Democrat in New York. He's working on some anti-bedding legislation. Yes. What legislation do you think is actually necessary to address this issue at this point? Because it doesn't feel like they're going to roll back the industry, right? So what is it that you think would be effective?

We're actually working very closely with Representative Tunko, and the question is, how do you do it safely? First of all, you get rid of the micro-bedding. You get rid of the ability to bet on whether the next pitch will be a ball or a strike. Whether it'll be a hit or a foul ball and so forth. How far the run will be? Will it be a pass or a run?

We should say in his legislation, that's under not using artificial intelligence to create gambling products like microbedding. That's a good example. Exactly.

That's the most addictive stuff.

Yeah. Another thing is advertising. He wants no sportsbook advertising during live sporting events, no programming designed to induce gambling with a bonus, etc. But we're now in a moment where advertising is so different. It's built into all of these digital products. It almost feels like there's no way to get away from it. That feels very different from the era of putting the label on the cigarettes.

Well, the label on the cigarettes didn't do much good either. It was really getting the ads off television and getting effective counter ads running for at least a while on television.

In a way, tech is what's driving this gambling moment, and it feels like it's been much more difficult. I've talked to attorneys for parents who are trying to sue Facebook and Meta and Twitter, et cetera, over problems they see that affected their children. And it's tough. I mean, it really is an uphill battle.

That's right. But I think congressman TACO's approach will work because the Supreme Court made very clear that Congress had very, very broad authority to ban this thing or restricted in pretty much any way. And if Congress didn't do it, or unless until Congress did it, each state had very broad authority to do that. I think there's going to be a very quick change of opinion. So is it likely that congressman Tango is going to get his bill through this year? Probably not. But is he going to get people thinking about it and joining a coalition and saying, Hey, wait a second. This was not on my agenda, but I think it needs to be on my agenda. I think we're going to see parents groups. I think that's going to be very important. Like Mothers Against Drug Driving was a very important group. You have a anti-vaping group called PAVE, Parents Against Vaping. I think there are local parents groups come in and say, Wait a second, congressman or senator or congresswoman, look what's happening here to your constituents.

That's a good point because the one, not one, but the most recent apology I saw in social media came from Mark Zuckerberg, two parents, at a congressional hearing where they were heckling him.

I think that's very powerful, and I think that's going to turn the tide on this as people come in and say, Hey, wait a second. This is affecting real people, and affecting real people in a very bad way and a very predictable way. Not predictable by us. I didn't know anything about it. I didn't understand how this works. I didn't even realize it was addictive. And what does microbet? I never heard of a microbet. There were no microbets until you had these sports gambling apps. So I think people are going to look at it and say, wait a second. Yeah, we're not against gambling, generally. It's been around for, presumably, thousands of years. But this particular, particularly toxic, extremely toxic for him of gambling, no, that doesn't have to be permitted.

What do you want your legacy to be?

Well, I have a piece of it already with tobacco. Well, it depends what you mean by legacy. If it's a question of what would I want a young person to take from this, somebody who's still flexible, looking for How can I make a difference in life? That, yeah, you can make a difference in life. Don't let yourself be put off by the fact that when you share an idea, people tell you, No, no, no, that's impossible. That's not going anywhere. If they haven't come up with really good persuasive arguments, go forward. Go with it. Roll your sleeves up and and take it to the next step. A really important contribution is likely to be something that originally was thought of by all the right-thinking people as just, it's not done. It's impossible. It's stupid. In whatever. And I feel lucky. I feel blessed, if that's the word, that I was able to actually make a difference in the world. As long as I'm able, I'd like to continue doing That was Richard Daynard, a professor at Northeastern University and President of the Public Health Advocacy Institute.

As we reported this story, we reached out to DraftKings for comments on Daynard's lawsuit, and here's their response. I'm going to read it to you. Draftkings takes consumer protection and responsible gaming seriously. Draftkings respectfully disagrees the claims and allegations made by the Public Health Advocacy Institute. The disclosures and explanations provided to customers before they make an initial deposit are detailed, clear, conspicuous, and informative. The company goes on to say that multiple examples are provided, and regrettably, the institute ignored our multiple attempts to engage in an in-person dialog to carefully examine their concerns in light of these disclosures, and instead, filed suit. The company also pointed to tools that they say give users information that can help empower players to make data-driven decisions on their own play, as well as offer customers the ability to control how they engage with our app through cool-off periods, deposit, and wager limits. The company pointed to their work with organizations like the newly formed Responsible Online Gaming Association, among others. The company Fannie ends their statement by saying, A core priority for DraftKings is ensuring that customers are using our products as intended for safe and responsible entertainment. As always here at the assignment, we believe in transparency, and so we put the full statements in our show notes.

You can find them there. The Assignment is a production of CNN Audio, and CNN Audio has been nominated for a bunch of Webby awards. A big congrats to all of my CNN audio colleagues, Anderson Cooper, Sanjay Gupta, David Reind, and the team behind the podcast, Tug of War. I also want to note that the assignment has been nominated for two awards, Best Interview Talk Show and Best Host. Thank you so much to our crew of producers here. We know that it's also in part thanks to you, our listeners. The Webbies are awarded by a public vote, which means I got one more thing to ask. Can you head over to the website and vote? It's vote. Webbyawards. Com and cast a vote for us. This episode of The Assignment was produced by Carla Javier. Our senior producer is Matt Martínez. Dan Dizula is our technical director, and Steve Ligtai is the executive producer of CNN Audio. Support comes to us from Haley Thomas, Alex Manasari, Robert Mathers, John Dianora, Lenny Steinhart, Jamis Andress, Nicole Pessereau, and Lisa Namarou. We got help this week from Sammie Ali and Dan Blum. Special thanks, as always, to Katie Hinman.

I'm Adi Cornish, and thank you for listening.

When you work, you work next level. When you play, you play next level. When it's time to sleep, Sleep Number smart beds are designed to embrace your uniqueness, providing you with high-quality sleep every night. Sleep Next Level. Jd Power ranks Sleep Number number one in customer satisfaction with mattresses purchased in store. Now, the Queens Sleep Number C4 smartbed is only $1,599. Save $300 for a limited time only at sleepnumberstores or sleepnumber. Com. Price is higher in Alaska and Hawaii.