Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. America, Mark Levin, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one 877 three eight one three eight one one. Not only are you loyal of nights listening, but interlopers with left wing sites and newsrooms are all listening.

What am I going to say?

We've been going at it all day on the Internet. Have you noticed? If you're on parler, you notice. And so now the media trying to divide the Republican stories on how long will the Republicans support President Trump, how long will they be loyal to Trump? Those questions are never asked of the Democrats. And I keep hearing and I posted early this morning, Decision Desk HQ, I asked, what is decision desk HQ? Is that tied to Kuhnen?

I don't even know. Kuhnen is I don't know. But apparently these decision desks are going to determine who the president has not. Let me explain something to you.

Nobody, no group, no entity. Can declare or pronounce who the president is, there is a constitutional process on top of a federal statutory process for how for how this process works. Until that process is triggered. And effectively implemented. There is no declaration of a president. Now I know I'm queen about these things, I talk about the Constitution. But there's litigation ongoing. Win, lose or draw, it needs to be completed. Al Gore sued and sued and sued in one state.

For 37 days, the Supreme Court had to get involved twice, the U.S. Supreme Court. The Florida Supreme Court was a rogue court filled with leftist just like the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as a rogue court filled with leftists.

So I don't know. Why the president of the United States should surrender. I'm going to tell you something. You are being pressured now and you are being propagandized now, and I'm coming under enormous pressure. To just, quote, unquote, accept the results. You better not talk about any of these conspiracy theories or anything of the sort, what conspiracy theories? I never talk about conspiracy theories, the left. Talks about conspiracy theories when the Russia hoax was going on, I don't remember anybody telling me not to talk about that because it's a hoax.

Accept and respect the results. Ladies and gentlemen. For four friggin years, the Democrats accepted no results for four friggin years, they said this was an illegitimate president who was elected by Vladimir Putin for four friggin years. They were investigating on one committee after another for four friggin years. They tried a coup to try to reverse the 2016 election results. For two and a half friggin years, they unleashed a criminal prosecution against the president of the United States that failed.

The minute they took the House of Representatives two years into his presidency, they impeach the president of the United States. For a perfectly fine phone call he made to the president of Ukraine. And every Democrat in the Senate voted to remove the president of the United States and Mitt Romney voted to remove them to. Since the moment he ran in 2016 with spies put on his campaign with a rogue FBI, a rogue intelligence service, a rogue FISA court. Tried to take him out.

The FBI director with dirt on his hands, the deputy FBI director, the associate director of the FBI. Day in and day out, day in and day out, this president was hounded, our president was hounded. His family was hounded. He didn't have one day of peace, not one day, and that was the plan, and they attacked him in the house and they attacked him in the Senate and every damn day in the media, they attacked him in the Manhattan DA's office in New York City.

Attack him. Now, the attorney general of New York. Thousands of subpoenas on and on and on and on it goes. The press corps. The American press, Solís itself. Undermines the American people, undermines the office of the presidency. But now we're told. Accept and respect the results. Well, the results are in over. I understand the president of the United States has an uphill battle and I'll explain why it's not because of the facts of the law.

But now we have Republicans. Breaking away. The Democrats never break away. And this is the problem with the Republican Party. And this is why they don't like Donald Trump. He's a strong man, he's a courageous man, he doesn't run, they do. And if it wasn't for Trump, the Republicans wouldn't have held the Senate if it wasn't for Trump, the Republicans wouldn't have picked up seats in the House. And if it wasn't for Trump, two state legislatures wouldn't have been flipped.

But they don't care. They act like they don't care. Now, Joe Biden's going to speak at eight o'clock, this is the third time since the election. Why? Because he's been told to act like your president, Kamala Harris, will be act like the vice president. Get things underway now. Accept and respect the results. Remember, all the violence the left was talking about was in one paper after another was in one news story in it.

Where is it? There isn't any. Because their man one wears black lives matter nowhere while they may be in Portland, but that's it. Antifa, I've told you all along, this is these are the paramilitary arms of the Democrat Party. And. Black Lives Matter, their leaders made abundantly clear their goal was defeat Trump. Their goal was to defeat Trump. So now we're told the nation must unify, we must get back to normal. Now that we have destroyed the man you elected in 2016.

Now that we've destroyed, in my opinion, a historic figure now from their perspective, that we've defeated him now. The cities burn, we called you racists, we called you systemically racist. We talked about you as white privilege and. And by the way, did you see the minority vote for Trump?

I'll get to that later. We called him Hitler. We said anybody voted for him were neo-Nazis. But now all is OK because we won the presidency. So, Jess, unite behind us. Do what we tell you to do. Keep your mouth shut. And all will be fine. Not me. Unless the Democrat Party and their president. Receives some of the same medicine. The same medicine they fed to us, the American people. Trump supporters and the president, the United States, this will never end.

If they can do and say whatever they want. When a Republican is elected, not just a Republican. When a man like Donald Trump is elected. And in return, nothing. Then they're going to keep doing it. So I will say this. Should Joe Biden become president? I'm part of the resistance. Oh, yeah. I learned from the media, I learned from the Democrats, I learned from Bernie Sanders, an EEOC and Hatif from Black Lives Matter.

Now I'm part of the resistance. Now, I believe in a peaceful transfer of power, so I'm not talking about violence, I never have, but I will never accept Joe Biden as president. Because Joe Biden never accepted Donald Trump as president. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer never accepted Donald Trump as president ever. There's not a single newsroom in America. That accepted Donald Trump as president. Oh, technically, yes. But substantively, no. Now, let's see how the news media treat, God forbid, if Joe Biden becomes the president, let's see how they treat him.

We've already seen. But just remember this, elephants never forget. I never forget. We do everything civilly and lawfully here, unlike the left. But all those businesses that boarded up can now take down the plywood. Because the paramilitary wing of the Democrat Party seems satiated. They seem just fine. Imagine that. We're still going to have to defend our country from. Come what may. But this thing's not over. We fight and notice how we fight legally.

When we come back. I want to address the media and Republicans and Democrats who keep saying, where's the evidence? That's the new mantra, where's the evidence of fraud? Now, keep in mind, the media are not in any of these places to look for fraud. And keep in mind, even here, former federal prosecutors and others talking about this, we're in the third day of this and so serious lawyers that is serious litigators, whether they're criminal or civil, they need time to develop the evidence.

So when you say three days in, where's the evidence? Where's the evidence? I'm going to give you the greatest evidence of all. Of tampering. With the election system, I'll be right back, my love in. Hillsdale College serves for purposes learning character, faith and freedom, education and faith thrive in freedom and freedom requires educated people and people of good character to preserve it. Hillsdale College has been providing the education needed to preserve free government for over one hundred and seventy five years, not only to its 1500 undergraduate and graduate students, but nationwide through its free online courses and through its support of classical K through 12 charter schools.

HILLSDALE Those articles of association dating way back to 1844 commit to preserving the blessings of civil and religious liberty through the provision of sound learning. The learning includes the Constitution. It includes the laws of nature and nature's God. As described in the Declaration of Independence. Hils does motto is pursuing truth and defending liberty since 1844. And it will continue to fight to live up to that motto. Come What may learn more at Lhevinne for Hillsdale. Dotcom Oblivion. For Hillsdale Dotcom.

Lövin for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Pennsylvania.

The speaker of the House of Pennsylvania representing the majority in the House, as well as the majority in the Senate, its Republican legislature sent a letter to the governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania said, are you aware the general election currently being conducted in the Commonwealth has generated significant amount of interest among our citizens?

And they're demanding an audit, a statewide audit now, among other things, you want to hear about fraud? I'm going to tell you when you change the laws and you change the rules to accommodate the Democrats.

To contravene the state legislature, which is the only body mentioned in the federal constitution under Article two, Section one, Clause two as the authoritative branch of government, state or federal, that determines how electors are chosen. That is fraud. I don't care if it's done by a court. Done by a governor or done by a board of elections. Now, what did the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania do, just as rogue as the Supreme Court of Florida in 2000, majority of elected left wing Democrats, it unconstitutionally extended the deadline to receive late ballots in contravention of state law.

That same court unilaterally directed the county boards of elections to not reject absentee or mail in ballots for counting, computing and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees are the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons. That, however, is the opposite of state law. It's one of the most important security in antifraud features the state had with absentee ballots and MALINS, the secret secretary of state, a Democrat elected, issued conflicting guidance to counties regarding how to manage late arriving ballots.

Full segregation is initially contemplated, was replaced with guidance that encouraged the counties to process ballots but keep total separated. Prior to the election, in contravention of state law and a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling, some counties began canvassing ballots by reviewing the declaration. To find any defects which they then sought to have cured by voters going back to them. But the law doesn't provide that. In Pennsylvania, pollwatchers hallmark of our election process unlawfully in violation of Pennsylvania law, denied the opportunity to meaningfully observe the proceedings of all three canvass and canvass activities.

Finally, an unprecedented 100 and 5000 provisional ballots have been issued. And so it's very questionable why so many of those ballots were issued when you don't issue them willy nilly. You wish them, for example, of what his name doesn't appear on the poll or supplemental poll book or a vote was issued but did not successfully voted absentee or mail in ballot, but you don't hand them out like lollipops. So there you have in Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court, a rogue court violating state law, imposing its own will and most of those measures that that court put in place.

We're measures that the governor, the liberal Democrat governor of Pennsylvania wanted and the state assembly affirmatively reject him, then they go to the court and get it.

So for all you Republicans out there, all you hosts out there, where is the evidence of fraud? I just gave you the evidence of fraud, legal fraud, where you had a rogue court, a rogue secretary of state and a rogue governor undermining the state legislature and violates the federal constitution. Hillsdale College serves for purposes learning character, faith and freedom, education and faith thrive in freedom and freedom requires educated people and people of good character to preserve it.

Hillsdale College has been providing the education needed to preserve free government for over one hundred and seventy five years, not only to its 1500 undergraduate and graduate students, but nationwide through its free online courses and through its support of classical K through 12 charter schools. Hils those articles of association dating way back to eighteen four, commit to preserving the blessings of civil and religious liberty through the provision of sound learning. The learning includes the Constitution. It includes the laws of nature and nature's God.

As described in the Declaration of Independence. Hils Doe's motto is Pursuing Truth and defending liberty since 1844. And it will continue to fight to live up to that motto. Come What may learn more at Lavant for Hillsdale. Dotcom Oblivion. For Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. Mark Levin, the champion of liberty and true conservatism, call Mark now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. You know, unemployment.

Hugely dropped to six point nine percent. Another pharmaceutical company has announced that they're going to have their vaccine ready by January. All of this was set in motion by the president of the United States. All of it. Joe Biden wanted unity. He wants unity on his watch for his agenda. Why didn't he want unity the past four years? Kamala Harris, the most left wing senator. In the Senate. Did she sound like she wanted unity? So this isn't about getting even.

This is about. What's fair is fair. You can't treat a president the way they treated this president, we've never seen anything like this in American history and this will be written about for decades.

For decades. Now, what the Democrats did. And this isn't a conspiracy theory is they spent the entire Trump presidency, but particularly the last year and especially the last six months going into states and filing lawsuits. Or colluding with Democrat governors and legislatures to change their laws to accommodate. Their nominee, who would be Biden and the Democrat Party? 320 lawsuits were filed. Since the primaries. As The Daily Caller points out. 320 lawsuits were filed. Since the primaries across 45 states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, according to Election Law blog, almost all of them had been filed by the progressive left and their allies in the Democrat Party, said Hans von Spakovsky, manager of Heritage's Election Law Reform Initiative.

Now, why do they file these lawsuits? It's a record number of lawsuits, not even close. Pushing mail and voting, pushing no signature. Pushing, counting the vote well beyond Election Day. And they got most of what they wanted. It concerned a lot of litigation states that opted against altering certain laws, which so-called voting rights groups and Democrats demanded. And most of them got them because they cherry picked the states and they cherry picked the courts. Other lawsuits came about as a result of states making changes the Republicans opposed.

Almost all of them have been filed by the progressive left and their allies in the Democrat Party, Hans von Spakovsky said in September.

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's campaign formally assembled a legal war room comprised of lawyers who are fighting cases nationwide, according to the AP. Marc Elias, this is the slip and fall.

Ambulance chasing lawyer that was behind the dossier. He's their bagman, Marc Elias, who had been general counsel to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, was leading the war room.

I told you, this is all organized, it's all network. What states they were go into, what lawsuits they were bring, what they would ask. And so you see these reporters at the White House, you see reporters in these various cities, to the extent there are any you see hosts on TV, where is the evidence of fraud?

Where is the evidence of fraud? They changed the rules. They changed the law.

And in many cases, they did it unconstitutionally by going around the state legislatures, not in all cases, but many cases, including significant cases.

Well, that's not fraud. Of course, it's fraud. I didn't say they robbed a bank. I'd even say they stole any ballots, I said they changed the laws in violation of the Constitution and I'll get to that later. Elias and his team, in other words, Biden's lawyers were involved in more than 60 of the cases. More than 60 of the cases and of course, in every case, Elias and Biden's team said if they didn't when it was voter suppression.

Von Spakovsky said they are trying to force states to push absentee or mail in voting as much as possible, and I would add extra days to count.

By the way, I have a question. In Pennsylvania, if you don't have a postal mark, stamp a date. It's assumed you mailed it on time. That means people actually could have voted after the. The date of the election doesn't Mr.. That means they actually could have voted after the day of the election. So if they really want every vote to count and they really think it ought to be extended to everybody because because otherwise you're disenfranchising people.

Well, then why didn't they allow in-person voting for three days after the election date? Since I got rid of the signature comparison, the postmark didn't mean anything. Why couldn't they let in person? Because it would have helped the Republicans.

That's why. Because the Republicans would have seen the results and more of one report out voted for the president. That's why I know about Mark. We're talking about extending the counting, not if you're taking dates off the off the postal stamp and not if you don't have signature matching. You don't know what you're talking about. But anyway, why not allowing more voters, right, isn't that the name of the game, let everybody vote, count the votes and if you don't.

Where's the evidence of fraud? Where's the evidence of fraud? It's bigger than the evidence of fraud when you're changing the rules to accommodate one party or another. Pennsylvania Supreme Court, do you realize it ruled that the deadlines that the legislature had had in place for years? That those deadlines because of the coronavirus were unconstitutional. In other words, they look for a fig leaf and it was the virus. Unconstitutional. So the governor was pushing for these changes.

The secretary of state, two left wing Democrats, and they got him from four left wing elected Democrats, justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Now that they do that. Because of the virus that they do that because they wanted to help Biden, it's obvious. And it did. They succeeded. How come last election, four years ago, we knew who the winner was by about 2:00 or 3:00 in the morning, same states. Same states. But we knew that Donald Trump had won.

Why is that? And now we're three days, four days could be nine days. I'll explain it to you this way. I've brought this up to you before, you've heard of Cloward and Piven, right? Cloward and Piven are these two Marxist pigeons is still alive, Prof's Klauer apparently is not. And they wrote they've written a lot of very radical things, they've actually called for violent, violent riots over the years. But one of the things that they impressed upon their readers and their students and so forth is this.

Overload the system. Crashed the system. Create chaos. Seized power. Then blame the victim, your opponent. Is that not exactly what's occurring here, ladies and gentlemen? They overloaded the system. With massive early voting, one of the things and I'll make this I'll make this statement and then I'll let the backbenchers regurgitate it, pretend they thought it up. I spent a lot of time thinking about these issues.

I've spent a lot of time of my life dealing with these issues. I didn't start out as a broadcaster. Notice this. Underscore this. The Democrats won earlier and earlier voting and I posted this today. And later and later, ballot counting. Have you noticed that, Mr. Producer? Earlier and earlier voting and later and later ballot counting. Less and less security measures. So they want to be able to control the process, does the Democrat Party. So to have a firm date, have a firm date when when envelopes have to be postmarked.

Have a firm requirement that signatures need to match. Have a firm date when the ballots need to be in not three days after the date, but of the date. When you don't have requirements to allow the Republican Party to observe in the inner cities what's going on with the Democrat machines at the counting the ballots.

All of this is intended to help the Democrat Party, all of it. All of it. And I told you the other day the Democrats would never agree to this when it comes to paying your taxes. Firm dates, and you must you must hit the date, otherwise 10 percent penalty, and if you don't pay within a certain amount, we will send you to prison. But when it comes to voting. Every vote counts. Well, of course, every vote has to count.

Because they've changed the rules. So what's a legal vote now? Well, I'll ask the host on TV what's a legal vote now in Pennsylvania, what's a legal vote now? There's a constitutional challenge in the Supreme Court, absolutely legitimate on what the Democrats did in the court system, what they did in the governor's office, what they did to the board of elections. There's a challenge now. Now they could lose because of John Roberts on the Supreme Court, but it's still a legitimate.

Challenge, it's a constitutional challenge that is intended to uphold Article two. So what's a legal vote tonight? Is the legal vote what the Supreme Court? In Pennsylvania did to the voting system, so every vote is legal or is the legal vote what the state legislature originally put in place? This is exactly why the Supreme Court of the United States told Pennsylvania to segregate votes, put those aside. That could be in dispute based on the Constitution and those that are obviously within the time frame.

So are the legal votes, the ones that are segregated out, ladies and gentlemen, how come the top post the House won't tell us? How come Chris Christie won't tell us? How come Adam Kinzinger, who the hell are these people? Oh, there's Adam Kinzinger, who gives a flying. Yes. Because it's a good quote for the liberal media, because he undermines US president. What next? If these institutions are bastardized by the Democrat Party because the ends justify the means.

What's going to happen after this election and the one after that? They're going to control the whole damn process the way they do in California. If it wasn't for Donald Trump, we wouldn't have gained seats in the House, if it wasn't for Donald Trump, we wouldn't have saved the Senate, he brought out all these Republicans.

Now, let me explain something very quickly, because we're coming up to a break.

I hear people say, how can it be? And I said it, but I started to think about it. That we win seats in the House, we hold the Senate, but Donald Trump, they say, is losing. I'll tell you how. Because the Republicans who have won in the House weren't running in Democrat controlled cities. They were taking back seats that were in mostly Republican areas, most of the Senate seats that we have won. Are not in dark blue states.

They're in red or purple states. Donald Trump had to fight off the city machines. The city machine's most of the Senate candidates did not and none of the House candidates had. So he carried the house over the finish line, he carried the Senate over the finish line, and now he's fighting for his presidency when a number of the states. These courts. And these boards of elections. Modified their rules and their laws to defeat him. And now his party runs from him.

I'll be right back. Much love in. Hillsdale College serves for purposes learning character, faith and freedom, education and faith thrive in freedom and freedom requires educated people and people of good character to preserve it. Hillsdale College has been providing the education needed to preserve free government for over one hundred and seventy five years, not only to its 1500 undergraduate and graduate students, but nationwide. So its free online courses and through its support of classical K through 12 charter schools.

Hils, those articles of association dating way back to 1844 commit to preserving the blessings of civil and religious liberty through the provision of sound learning. The learning includes the Constitution. It includes the laws of nature and nature's God. As described in the Declaration of Independence. Hils does motto is pursuing truth and defending liberty since 1844. And it will continue to fight to live up to that motto. Come What may learn more at Lhevinne for Hillsdale. Dotcom Oblivion.

For Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

At the top of the next hour, I'm going to demonstrate to you how the left wing media work you already know, but I especially in my case over a posting I put on Parler, Twitter and Facebook and Twitter.

What did they say about it, Mr. Producer?

About my posting? I think they said something like 10, disp. They flagged it because they're filled with low IQ, illiterate morons over there, but I'm going to point it out to you. The Washington Post, one after another, picked it up because one guy got it wrong.

Forbes'.

At sea an. Yahoo! The Daily Mail, looking at them all, Mother Jones, bunch of mothers over their. Law and crime all arguing against a point I never made. And they're still doing it. These are supposed to be lawyers and columnists and the pretty people and the beautiful people, they're stupid as hell and they're propagandists and I'm going to demonstrate it to you.

But first tonight, nine thirty PM Eastern Time. I will be on Hannity on Fox Y. Because he asked me nine thirty PM Eastern Time. I will be on Hannity, on Fox. So we have a number of newspapers here, it's very frustrating when people lie about you or their. Purposely pushing out propaganda. And it's 1:00 in the afternoon and here's the thing, I will say it again after the top of the hour. I will be explicit.

I will speak in plain English.

It'll be on. Mark Levin showed Web site for a daily recap for anybody to listen to. I write in plain English, I post in plain English. But they don't want to know the truth about what you say, they want to argue a different point. There's a guy by the name of Ezra Klein.

He's a founder of this thing called Vox, he's either one of the stupidest human beings. Walking on four legs. Or he is a pathological liar. And he's not the only one, this clown from The Washington Post, what is his name? I'll get to all of them. I like to do this. I will get back to this. I can't remember his name. I'll figure it out later. Oh, yeah. Greg Sargent.

Well, Greg Sargent, I'm knocking it down to Greg Buck. Private, you're a complete schmuck. I'll go through this when we return. You won't want to miss it.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here, he's here. Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader. I love that. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Think about this for a second. There's more instances of fraud out there, even small instances of fraud that we can point to in the media that the media presented to us. Then there was ever fraud related to. Russia collusion. There was never any Russian collusion. Do you remember the media saying, where's the evidence? Do you remember that, Rich? They must have missed that. Do you remember the media saying to Adam Schiff, where's the evidence?

Do you remember them asking where the klaper where's your evidence? No, no, we need evidence. Do you ever remember Jake Tapper asking for evidence? You see, my attitude is this. I'm very pissed off. That they did let this man have a four year normal presidency. I am very, very pissed off.

And the idea that. We should all, quote, unquote, play nice. As I say. If Donald Trump for tonight leading, there'd be riots in the streets and the media would call them mostly peaceful and the media would be rooting for Biden. There are no riots in the streets because that's not what we do. That's not what we do. But I think Joe Biden should be treated exactly the way Donald Trump was treated by Jim Acosta. By Deliman.

By Friday, Cuomo, by Nancy Pelosi, by Adam Schiff. By Joe Scarborough, they're all one in the same pod. By Chuck Schumer and all the rest. Shall we call him Hitler? No, because I don't believe in that. Just think about the things they said and did to this man because he happened to win election to the presidency. That is a scar all of us are going to have for the rest of time. For the rest of time, they built a resistance in the Democrat Party of resistance in the media, the media were part of the resistance.

And we sit here and talk like a bunch of technocrats and an analysts like they do on TV and in Washington.

Well, you don't want to. That's right here. It's time to move on and get the.

Excuse me. We were all living the last four years, we all saw what the hell took place here. And then they go into these states and they change the rules and many of these states. Not a single rule change that I'm aware of helped the Republicans, not one. Every legal count, every every legal vote counts. Now we have some true stupidity going on here, true stupidity going on here, Don Junior.

Who tweeted something I posted? He's coming under attack and under attack for what? Now we have it's this this full. With Vox, what was his name again, I forget what I said, Ezra Klein. Here's what I posted. In caps.

Reminder to the Republican state legislatures, you have the final say over the choosing of electors, not any board of elections, secretary of state, governor or even court, you have the final, say, Article two of the federal constitution. So get ready to do your constitutional duty. Anywhere in there. Did I say the state legislature should choose the electors? Nowhere. What have I been saying on this radio show? What have I been arguing and writings, what are they putting men in?

Black thought that the state legislature should choose the electors.

But that the state legislators should reinstate the existing campaign laws that existed before the rogue Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, as an example, did what it did, in other words, the status quo, the state law that was in place. That only the legislature has the power to put in place under Article two of the federal Constitution. That's how all voting should be tested. I never said the state legislators. Should choose the electors. So where do these clowns get off saying that?

Here's one, a whole Joe Walsh, he looks like he's about 14 years old, prepubescent writing at Forbes Trump ally suggests the Electoral College could overturn a Biden win. Here's what that why that probably won't work has no idea what I'm talking about, because he's an idiot. Then we have Greg Buck, what did I say about Private Greg Sargent, always a moron, writing for The Washington Post, Mark Levin, the right wing radio host, always right wing, set off a Twitter firestorm on Thursday afternoon with this.

And he quotes what I read to you. This is an explicit call for a friendly GOP state legislature in a swing state, say Pennsylvania, to appoint its own separate pro Trump slate of electors to the Electoral College in defiance of the popular vote outcome in their state. I never said that. What did he get that from those words have never been uttered by my lips as they Mr. Minister. They never crossed my lips. Lawrence Lessing and another clown, this is a clown, professor, state legislatures can't ignore the popular vote in appointing electors.

So he concludes that I said the same thing. This man has no idea what I said. Get ready to do our constitutional duty, quote unquote, Trute tweeted. Conservative radio host Mark Levin sued Donald Trump Jr. retweeted Levin. Later that night, Lindsey Graham joined the bandwagon. To do what? To do what? This is a law professor who obviously doesn't believe in the Constitution, then he gives these cockamamie, pathetic arguments. Twists the language, twists the history of that provision in the Constitution, that provision of the Constitution couldn't be clearer.

There's nothing to twist. They just don't like it. The Daily Mail. They even asked. The president of the Republican state senator in Pennsylvania, do you agree with the tweet from Donald Trump Jr. in the tweet, a Mark Levin that you should pick the Electricidad? Course not. We can't do that. Well, I never said that. But he can't get off his fat butt and do what else I did say. And it goes on. Here we have what's this garbage here, let's see.

I don't know. Fox News pro Trump stars are getting desperate. Mark Levine, a well-known conservative talk radio host who hosts a weekend show for Fox, suggested in all caps Twitter screamed that GOP controlled state legislature should disregard the vote tallies and appoint electors who will select Trump in the end. Where did I say that, Mr. Producer? Nowhere, absolutely nowhere, Maxwell Tany, Justin Baragon, a. I could have negative 14 combined, I never said that.

So they're arguing against something I never said. Yahoo! News.com, Yahoo is about right. Biden urges calm as votes continue to be kept calm among what it says, people who like Molotov cocktails, we don't. And I'm not talking about drinking either. As President Trump's lead over Joe Biden continued to fall Thursday, Fox News host, they always mention Fox, even though I'm only there one hour, they never say live in TV Blaze TV network.

Westwood One Fox kind of get Fox Fox News host Mark Levin suggested that if Trump ends up losing in key battleground states, Republican led legislatures there should overturn the will of the voters and choose a slate of electors that would keep him in the White House. When did I say that? Why do they keep saying the same thing? Mother Jones, Donald Trump Jr. just promoted a brazen plan to steal the election. All he did was reiterate what I said. And there's no stealing anything, then they call Greg Sargent.

One idiot quoting the next lawned crime, wow, another left wing site. One such theory was tweeted out in all caps by right wing radio host Mark Levin and then retreated by Donald Trump Jr. And of my post, they say, but Republican leadership in Pennsylvania, at least previously, put the kibosh on such ideas. What ideas? I never said the assembly should appoint the electors, not on the air nowhere. So I posted this in response to a so-called Professor Lessing.

It's very frustrating to continue to wreak constant claims, such as called, thankfully, it appears very unlikely that any legislature will accept Mark Levin's challenge and select a slate contrary to the votes of its people, unquote.

For the 1000 time, I never said they should, I have said in the past and in the present and have written that the state legislature should defend the election laws they legitimately passed and that the voting and vote count should be based on those standing statutes.

And by the way, this is exactly the case since before the United States Supreme Court, not the unconstitutional changes instituted by other bodies, is really not fundamental in liberal land.

Actually, they prefer to argue against positions never stated. So nice try, but we've all see this pablum before. It's not about disenfranchising anyone. It's about following the Constitution and the subsequent state election statuses adopted by the state legislatures. It's also about the Democrat Party undermining state election laws, sometimes within months of an election by litigating before friendly state courts like the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2020, the Florida Supreme Court or executive orders and administrative actions by Democratic governors and their administrations in contravention of existing statutory law.

These are the schemes that disenfranchise lawful and legitimate voters. None of this would be occurring, but for the actions and tactics of the Democrat Party, which acts to advantage itself by undoing Article two, this is a constitutional republic.

After all, there are rules and the framers could not have been clearer. The Democrat Party activity seems akin to the cloud and Pivot's tactic, as they described it in 1966, flood the zone, create chaos, declare victory and blaming to accuse your opponent of misbehavior. As is done in this rather ridiculous Lawfare article, which is notoriously liberal. And of course, if you argue that the Constitution should be followed, then you must oppose due process and seek to disenfranchise voters, et cetera, et cetera, then the actual history, the constitutional provision, which was necessary because the Constitution would not have been adopted, let alone ratified by the states, if the state legislatures were not in charge of the election process within their borders.

So they cherry pick, as this author did, and it's not surprising. But why bother with the Constitution at all, and as much as the basic argument by these authors and the rest of them is to abandon or to interpret the provision in a way where it's non-existent because modern times requires something else. And so we should leave it to state courts and governors and bureaucrats, none of whom are mentioned in the Constitution, in this provision, only the state legislature, but we should leave it to all of them except the state legislature to determine what the election laws are.

Then you're following due process and all the votes should count. The irony is lost. The irony is lost the idea that the due process clause that they use is a defense to attack.

Article two of the Constitution is only the kind of thinking, irrationality that you get out of a liberal.

I've set the record clear for the thousandth time, I've said so on the air. You can go back to past broadcasts, you can read Men in Black. I've said exactly the same time every single time. Is it too much to ask?

These asshole. Apple holds. That next time, get it right before you open your big pie holes. I'll be right back. Much love in. Black Friday, Cyber Monday, one day only sale, wouldn't you rather just work with a company who puts you on a pedestal every day? That's what you get with pure talk, a veteran run wireless company that understands what it means to serve Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile. Now, if you're with them, you're overpaying pure and simple.

Pure talk can easily save you over 400 dollars a year, unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. What a novelty. A company that actually puts their customers first. You can keep your phone and your number or get great deals on the latest iPhones and Androids. Just go to Pure Talk USA Dotcom. And in her promo code Lhevinne podcast, when you do, you'll say 50 percent off your first month.

That's pure talk. USA Dotcom Promo Code 11 Lhevinne podcast Pure Talk to USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

Many of you want to speak, don't forget, I'll be on Hannity in two hours, nine thirty p.m. Eastern. We're also going to have a fantastic life, liberty and love in.

8:00 p.m. Eastern on Sunday, my guests will be former judge, former independent counsel Ken Starr and Hans von Spakovsky, who you've heard me quoting.

We'll get into the law. We'll get into the courts.

We'll get into the Constitution as relates to all this and should be interesting. But more than that should be pertinent. Daniel, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, XM Satellite. Go right ahead, sir. Daniel, hello. Yes, go right ahead. This is this is Randy. No, no, I need Daniel from Fort Lauderdale.

How are you? Guys, what's going on? Daniel, are you there? Yes, sir, can you hear me OK, now I can. All right, it's an honor to be on your show. Me and my wife are a huge fan of yours. I would just like to say coronavirus. They changed all the election laws because of coronavirus at the CDC said that anyone with coronavirus can vote in person.

Therefore, first of all, tens of millions of us voted in person, in person early and in person on Election Day. So that was always bogus.

Correct.

So there's no evidence whatsoever that there was a spreading of the virus as a result of voting in person. So that was a leaf. That was a subterfuge that changed the rules.

Correct, because Nancy Pelosi, when she first took over the House, tried to pass H.R. one, which was election reform, and once that was shot down in the Senate, they tried to do it state by state. And this was way before coronavirus was even around. Then they did 400 million dollars for absentee ballots and Kahrizak then they added another 400 million dollars for absentee ballots. They funded the United States Postal Service with another 25 billion dollars.

And all of these tens of hey, hey, hey, what happened to all those conspiracy theories about the Postal Service?

Oh, come on. I mean, it's typical. That's what they do when we know their style.

But what do you agree with my phrase? Vote earlier and earlier and count later and later? Oh, 100 percent. That's why when he was up by 15 points, you know, and they wouldn't call Georgia, they went to L.A. They blew a pipe out supposedly. And then they all of a sudden found all these ballots.

What a useless governor, useless governor in the state of Georgia. They have a pipe blowout. They shut down the vote and he sits there like a bump on a log.

Well. What a joke it really is. It really is.

And the other thing with the terms of the way that you know who the superstar is, Ron DeSantis in Florida, Ron DeSantis, 100 percent. He's a superstar.

Oh, 100 percent. Yeah, I was perfect. He did everything perfectly and very, very impressive man.

He really is. Daniel, that music means I got to go. I apologize, but a very good call.

I'll be right back. Nobody says it better than Mark Levin. I'll go with reporter Mark Levin said, because nobody could say it. Better call in now. Eight, eight, seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Mr. Producer, let me ask a question since a personal question. How many emails or phone calls have you received from the candidates?

We help. Thanking this show, at least contributing somewhat for their election. Zero. I haven't heard from a single senator or a single congressman in that amazing. It's OK, it's OK, look, I'm not in this for a pat on the back. But it is an amazing thing. Purdue didn't want to come on the program. Now he's fighting for his life. It's too bad for him. We need that seat. Cory Gardner went down, not exactly fighting.

He he moved to the center, his opponent was a leftist governor. Hickel, Barry, or whatever the hell his name is, I don't really care what his name is. And the former governor of Colorado said he went down, I'm just writing a few notes to myself as I think about this. Gore had 37 days. To litigate, right, he litigated in one state. There were two Supreme Court rulings. What did he want the Supreme Court to do?

What did he want the Supreme Court to do? To change the way you count chads. He wanted to change the system. That's what he wanted to do. One of the Democrats done all over the country, they haven't litigated to defend and support existing campaign laws.

They've litigated to change them. I like California style, not because they believe in good government. Quite the contrary. But they belong. Believe in Democrat power grabbing. And then they dress it up as, don't you want people to vote, then they they hide behind Falchi. By the way, we're going to view things very, very differently going forward. Win, lose or draw in this presidential campaign when it comes to Falchi. When it comes to, you know, even different programs we watch and listen to.

Different networks we watch and listen to. I think people are going to change the way they view certain institutions. And as a result of our national experience, or at least 70 million of us are experience. And being put through this grinder. The media will never be the same again. The Congress will never be the same again, the Democrat Party will never, I mean, viewed the same again. What was done to our streets, what was done to our police officers, what was done to our our small businesses, what was said about us?

By extraordinarily wealthy athletes and politicians and entertainers. What was done to us in the attack on our president? Trying to sabotage his presidency every damn step of the way. These aren't things we forget. Can't we have unity? Listen to this mannequin buffoon, Biden. Did they respect the office of the presidency? Of course not. Did they respect the the outcome of the vote in 2016? No, they said the Russians did it. It Chuck Schumer, show any respect toward our president, did Nancy Pelosi show any respect toward our president?

How about CNN and MSNBC? How about every damn or virtually every damn newsroom across America? Now, none of them did. And you're supposed to just accept it on all the litigation that changed all the rules in the States, there's no reason to be waiting this long for outcomes. We're waiting this long for outcomes because they change the rules in Nevada.

They change the rules.

Three months ago, less than 90 days ago, to help Biden in Pennsylvania, the court changed the rules this summer at the direction of the governor. In defiance of the state legislature. In North Carolina, the board of elections. Made changes to the election procedures. Without the authority, without the delegation. Of the Republican state legislature and I go down the list. But every legal vote should count. But what makes a legal vote, this is why Republicans are fools.

Absolutely false. So Al Gore, Susan, 20, 20, not to uphold the law, but to change the way chads are counted, and he had a rogue Supreme Court that helped them every step of the way until the U.S. Supreme Court stepped in. That was under the Rehnquist court, unfortunately. The chief justice of the United States is a mental midget. And a political hack, little did we know. And he could have done what Rehnquist would have done or any other smart justice would have done.

And put an end to this as soon as it appeared at the emergency filing. And said, hey, the rules are the rules that were in place four or five, six weeks ago passed by the state legislature. And the Supreme Court can't do this instead, you know, Roberts, excuse us, that's a state court. I don't want to get federal courts. One thinks that's not what the provision says, that there's some magic difference between a state court and a federal court.

Where does Roberts come up with that? Where is that written? Where's that written in the Constitution? It's not written anywhere. It's a cockamamie, sophomoric. Ridiculous imposition of his of his position. That everybody smile. Everybody, everybody smile. Took 37 days to resolve the stupid Chad issue. Republicans got behind George Bush. They got behind the Bush team, they got behind the Bush lawyers. Is it too much to expect Chris Christie and Marco Rubio? Who's the senator from Pennsylvania, Pat Toomey and Adam Kingsburg, whatever the hell that fool's name, is it too much to expect them to get behind the president's legal effort even for a month?

For a month? It's amazing, so the Democrats change these rules and the Republicans, where's the evidence, the evidence for what? Fraud. It's a constitutional issue, geniuses, you know, you put a hand on the Bible, on the other hand in the air, and you say you're going to uphold the Constitution. Who gets to decide what? Then we have city after city where the Republicans are locked out of observing the counting, where is the evidence?

Where's the evidence? They won't even let us in to look. So they start regurgitating what left wing kooks have to say in the media. Don't file their briefs. They're collecting affidavits, will it be enough? Here's the problem. These judges are highly political. They watch the news to. You see how I came under attack, Mark wants to disenfranchise all these voters, see how they come under attack for daring to mention the Constitution, it ought to be upheld.

Well, some judges are going to fear that I worry about Kavanaugh, I do. Roberts is gone, but I worry about Cavanough. We're going to have five like these idiot and I. We have six conservatives on the court. And no, we don't even wrote a few of them. Stop saying it. It's not true. And they keep saying it because they like the narrative. The question is. If the court now says and Roberts has boxed them in, I understand that, but the court has to uphold the Constitution, the court has reversed.

State decisions, whether they're legislative decisions or court decisions or what have you in the past, I'm not talking about election law, but generally. The death penalty case is jury selection, arguing what you name a criminal case, a civil cases, administrative cases, so it's not new for the court to reverse decisions below and it's not new for that to have an impact. But here, the left in the media. Are going to brutalize any justice that upholds the Constitution.

Which is why they asked for the segregation or the separation. Friend of mine said, don't say segregation, I said the court said segregation, we're not talking about race, we're talking about ballots for crying out loud. The court asked them to separate. The ballots, because they're in dispute. Because without this massive mail in voting, Donald Trump would be president of the United States. That's why the Democrats went into these courts. Because it was too much to ask their base to get off their ass and go and vote in person.

Because apparently they don't like to vote in person. And they don't like to sign their ballots and they don't like to go to the post office and have a postal stamp on it, so anything to accommodate the Democrat base.

Anything goes in Pennsylvania now, all the security measures are off the table. Plus, why would we need Republicans in Philadelphia to look at what's going on? Why should we do that? Where is the fraud, Mark, where's the fraud, Mark? How stupid is this? Where is the fraud, Mark? That's like asking me where is the evidence of crime by the mob? I don't have any evidence by the mob, but they're called the mob for a reason.

Do you have any evidence, Mark? Any evidence, so the litigator's with the Trump team are doing what lawyers are supposed to do.

They're investigating, they're gathering the information. They have many, many examples. They'll probably be in their briefs relatively soon, but they have to file briefs that are strong briefs.

They can't accommodate the news cycle or these crackpot politicians. Hey, where's the evidence? I've just told you of the institutionalized fraud that took place here, the institutionalized enshrinement of constitutional violations that took place here, that's bigger than anybody stealing a ballot. But that means our institutions didn't serve us properly. But you know what I've decided, Mr. Producer, I may be the lone voice in America on this. I may be the last of the constitutionalists, I might be.

I might be I'll be right back. My love in. Black Friday, Cyber Monday, one day only sale, wouldn't you rather just work with a company who puts you on a pedestal every day? That's what you get with pure talk, a veteran run wireless company that understands what it means to serve Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile. Now, if you're with them, you're overpaying pure and simple. Pure talk can easily save you over 400 dollars a year, unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month.

And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. What a novelty. A company that actually puts their customers first. You can keep your phone and your number or get great deals on the latest iPhones and Androids. Just go to Pure Talk USA Dotcom. And in her promo code Lhevinne podcast, when you do, you'll say 50 percent off your first month. That's pure talk. USA Dotcom Promo Code 11 Lhevinne podcast Pure Talk.

USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

Well, first of all, we have a big a big order issued by the United States Supreme Court, specifically Sam Alito, associate justice.

And it's at the request of the Republicans in Pennsylvania. He has directed. The state of Pennsylvania to segregate all the votes that were cast after 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday.

To segregate them. And hold them separately. And I suspect count them separately now, all the grief I've taken all day and all day yesterday, trying to point out what the Constitution says. Daniel Horowitz wrote a piece for The Blaze. Which I've been talking about this issue, and, no, I never said the state legislature should pick the electors, even in men in black. I said that the Florida legislature was considering it, but I never endorsed that either.

But I did say what the legislature should fight for is the the the election law process that they had put in place before the Supreme Court at the push of the governor, all Democrats changed it because it's unconstitutional. Sam Alito has guts. Will there be four other justices have guts to uphold the Constitution? And what that means is if they're segregated, I don't know how this is going to end up, but if they're segregated. And not counted because of the violations of the Democrat Party, the Democrat governor, the Democrat secretary of state, the Democrats on the Supreme Court, if there's disenfranchisement, that's on them.

Not on the Republicans, not on Trump, and not on the Supreme Court. And that can have an impact. This is exactly what I've been saying. I said it in the first hour, I said it yesterday. I've been saying it over and over and over and over again. That's why these fools have made the wrong argument, who attacked me, wanting you going to pick their own electors now? The election law status quo that existed. Should never have been changed by the Democrats.

Outside of the legislative process, that's what I said. Now, let's see what happens. That is a big step by the. Justice Alito, this is why I say use the Constitution, use article to. Section one, clause two. It's as clear as day all the left wing professors hate it all, the Democrats hate it. They say follow the law, where's the fraud? The fraud is what that court did, it was rogue, the fraud is and what the governor and the secretary of state have done, pushing the court to go around the Republican legislature.

It's that simple. And if votes aren't counted, you can thank you can thank the Democrats in Pennsylvania and you can thank the Biden campaign. Marc Elias and all the other schmucks who've been scheming and scheming. Now, I have no idea what the full Supreme Court will do. That still way up in the air. But this initial order. Sets the stage. For a Supreme Court decision. That means there's four justices who are prepared to take up this case.

Otherwise, why issue the order? I told you, stay here throughout this because I know what I'm talking about. We don't need any legal analysts on TV. Who pretend they know what they're talking about. So I've been beating up on this all day. You want to know why? Because they're trying to send a message to the justices, Alito and Thomas and Gorsuch and perhaps Barat and hopefully Cavanough that this is what we're going to do. Don't worry about what they're going to do to you.

They don't write history. These men are munchkins. Don't write history. I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by Aimé, the Association of Mature American Citizens, now over two million conservative members, Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Amax U.S. Join is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. I want to remind you, this order had already been issued pretty much to Pennsylvania before, and the secretary of state there gave a contrary order.

And so this is Aledo. I assume speaking for the court, putting his foot down. The way Bloomberg law writes, a U.S. Supreme Court justice issued a temporary order. Orders are temporary until you get to the case requiring Pennsylvania officials to segregate ballots that arrived after Election Day, granting for now part of a request by the state's Republican Party.

Justice Samuel Alito's order came as part of a fight over ballots received during a three day extension issued by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Alito said he referred the matter to the full high court for the next steps. So this thing is now being teed up and now he wants to see if the full court's going to take it. I suspect it will, God willing, and it ought to do the right thing.

Those state officials had already told county officials to separate out those ballots. Republicans said that step didn't go far enough to ensure that they can be invalidated later. Republicans also said that the secretary of state was defying the order, which she was.

Which she was she was comingling the counting. And as you can see, what Justice Alito ordered was you segregate them and if if you're going to count them, you count them separately.

What he means by that is, hey, look, if we have a majority that says what you've done is unconstitutional, we need to know exactly how many ballots we're talking about here. And you need to know which ballots we're talking about, you see.

So that is a very, very interesting. Very, very interesting event, and it keeps it alive as far as I'm concerned, so I'm hoping I'm hoping rather that the full court takes it up and this thing's resolved properly. Otherwise, we're not that that article is going to be read out of the Constitution. It'll be read out of the Constitution, I have an example, not a fraud. But if a glitch and glitches can be just as problematic as fraud.

Laura Cox is the chairman of the Michigan Republican Party. And I want you to hear this hat tip, right, Schoop go wasn't enough. In Antrim County, ballots were counted for Democrats that were meant for Republicans, causing a six thousand vote swing against our candidates. The county clerk came forward and said tabulating software glitch and caused a miscalculation of the votes. Since then, we have now discovered that 47 counties use this same software in the same capacity.

Antrim County had to hand count all of the ballots, and these counties that use this software need to closely examine their results for similar discrepancies.

This could affect the Senate race there and it could affect the outcome of the presidential. This isn't a joke. So there is absolute evidence, not a fraud. But of a screw up. But either way, we're talking about votes. A screw up. And this has happened in other places, too. The Philadelphia city commissioner by the name of Lisa Daehlie was at a press conference today and remember, there was already a Supreme Court order telling them to separate these votes out after eight p.m. Eastern Time.

That work that were submitted. And if you're going to count them, count them separately. And so here's what this Philadelphia city commissioner had to say, cut 12 go for. The second question is by the reporter, how many segregated ballots do you have? Go ahead. I mean, to continue, I don't have that I don't have that number. We're going to continue. We are going to continue to count the ballots until they're all done in a very in a way that people will like, as we have been doing for these past few days.

We're going to get it done as quickly as possible and it will be accurate. So she will not.

Tell the reporter how many segregated ballots there are, which raises questions on whether they're being properly segregated. That's example number two, not necessarily a fraud, but of a screw up. Where people need to have answers and there are other examples, not conspiracy theories. But real live examples of things that have gone wrong, now we're a nation of. 320, 330 million people. About 140 million people give or take a vote at. Each state has a different system.

Some counties have different systems, one to the other. Are you telling me there's no screw ups? Give evidence, Mark, I just gave you some evidence. These are close elections in some of these states, Michigan, Wisconsin, where they say almost 90 percent of the registered voters turned out, nobody believes that. So they're going to check their computers to. So so the idea that we should rush through this. I'm not trying to give false hope, I'm not a Pollyanna, I'm just saying the idea that we should rush through this, every vote should count.

Yes, but every vote should count. That supposed to be be counted and it needs to be counted properly. And the reason you have two parties in the room looking at the votes is so one can check the other. You don't board up the windows and send the cops out to chase Republican poll watchers away like they're doing in Philadelphia, you only do that if you're KRUX.

And by the way, that violates Pennsylvania law, a clear violation of Pennsylvania law. No question about it. I want you to listen to Pat Toomey on CBS This Morning, cut to go, the president's speech last night was very disturbing to me because he made very, very serious allegations without any evidence to support it. Look, there are some irregularities. I'm sure there were some decisions that were very bad decisions made by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, made by the Philadelphia Election Commission.

And I'd be happy to get into those. But to answer your question directly, I am not aware of any significant fraud, any significant wrongdoing. If it's happened and the evidence needs to come out, we need to go to court. We need to punish the wrongdoers. We need to redress whatever I know about.

Senator, there's a process for this. You should know better than this. You're being set up to give the answer you gave. So now you're being broadcast all over the country saying what you're saying. Now, Senator, let me ask a question. Have you called a single lawyer working on the case in Philadelphia?

I have been called a single lawyer, I have several because I want to know what's going on.

And yes, dead people are voting in Philadelphia, among others. Among others, they're taking affidavits now. So you don't have a single significant case. But that's you don't know of a single significant case, do you speak for all the lawyers that are in Philadelphia now? What do you think they're doing in Philadelphia? Buying soft pretzels and tiny water ice?

No. That would be me, by the way, that's what I'd be, right? I kind of slip out and do exactly that. Let's listen to Chris Christie on ABC yesterday. So if CBS now of ABC one go, right? So if this stuff is going on that the president's talking about all of us to figured it out because it would undercut everything that we believe in our system. But as a prosecutor, that's like asking me to indict someone without showing me any evidence.

If you what what are you talking about? There's no what in the hell are you talking about?

Information's coming in to the president from the field, no doubt there is various staff members about what they're finding in these various areas of the country.

Well, we want to know what it is, but you're not going to know what it is until it's actually placed in a filing and brought in lawsuits. So. The Cape may orka, what he should have said was, look, these things take time. The president obviously has some information or I don't believe he'd be saying these things.

And it's only been when he said this, it's only been 48 hours.

It's only been 48 hours, but it certainly raises questions when a hundred and some thousand ballots are dropped in from one city and 99 percent of them are for Joe Biden or military ballots are found in a dumpster. These are all true, it's not conspiracy. I come back up every one of them. And so, yes, it may take a little bit of time. So I think that's what the president's saying, that's how you would have handled that Chris.

Chris, how is this guy ever trumps friend? How is this guy ever trumps friend? He goes out there and whacks him all the time. I don't get it. I really don't get it. And. He should also provide proper perspective, but I don't think he's smart enough to do it, which is. We have a huge problem with all these election changes that the Democrats got from Democrat courts and Democrat governors and going around legislatures or using Democrat legislatures in some cases to do certain things.

And this is a problem. It's a problem, that's why we knew who the winner was four years ago at 2:00 or 3:00 in the morning, and today we're still counting.

Hasn't it occurred to Christie or to me or any of them? What's going on here? I just told you all that over 300 cases were bought by the Democrats, over 60 of them were bought right since August under the direction of the Biden campaign. To extend counting times, to try and get rid of signature requirements, to change the the requirements for postmarks, things like that. Now, why would you do that? Why would you do that? The Pennsylvania leadership in the legislature says that the the court there took all their safeguards away.

The reason you have matching signatures. The reason you have actual apostates stamped on their. It's to safeguard to make sure the ballots are legitimate. The reason the law there requires both parties to be present are all parties.

It says, to safeguard all those things were washed away. Do you have evidence do you have evidence that Senator Chioggia Governor, you have evidence? So rather than explaining the context of what's going on and explaining there are lawyers are gathering information in a president's going to say this stuff, he he better really you know, he he has a duty to show. It's two days in when they were talking. Now it's three days in. I mean, gee whiz, you know the Democrats.

Trump is guilty until proven innocent. No, he's just guilty, you have to prove anything. But the Republicans are just backstabbers. I'll be right back. My love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them man believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington.

AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's.

That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, my home city, Harry, how are you? I'm doing OK, Mark, how are you?

All right, Patti, go right ahead. By the way, about every fourth woman in Philadelphia is named Patty, do you know that we're all good people here? You know that? Yes, you are. I love my old city. But anyway, just I can't stand the leftists that run it.

Mark, I have to tell you, I feel so disenfranchised and I'm so embarrassed of this state. Why do Republicans run it and do not stand up for our president? To get to me. I mean, the people who can or legislature, but the thing that gets me is I think this election is a little bit more broader than just Donald Trump. I think it's a referendum on the American people. We did not choose the correct candidate last time and they could not trust us to choose the correct candidate this time.

Hmm. From their perspective, no, you're quite right. Correct. Well, look, Donald Trump didn't have one hour's piece is president of the United States. He has not won our peace.

We're supposed to unite behind the the mannequin. How put that all behind you, ladies and gentlemen. No, no, I'm going to treat Biden the way Pelosi, Schumer, Jim Acosta. Treated by president. What's wrong with that, Patty? Oh, I can't wait to see him try to handle health or even a quarter of what poor President Trump has had to deal with.

Now the Chinese are going to run circles around him, and that's a problem for us. He says he's going to go back into the Iran deal.

He's going to do very, very stupid things. But before we say what he's going to do, let's still try to defeat the man. Is there anything that we can do, Mark? I have no there's not a lot that the people can do anymore. The voting is over. I hear people say, can we have rallies? He can do whatever you want. It's not going to affect a single judge. It's now in the courts. It amazes me that the people in the state of Pennsylvania who are responsible for the counting are tweeting about how to use the word president in front of Trump.

It demeans the office of the presidency. Mm hmm.

So what I mean, can we unite around their guy? It's what I mean, you and I.

Supposed to have flower power. Remember that the hippies were flower power. Meanwhile, the other side, their paramilitary wings throwing Molotov cocktails. Isn't it amazing the riots have stopped temporarily? I know well, they had to make a phone call to stop it because he didn't look good in the polls.

But but my point is, we know, as a matter of fact, now that those were Democrats supporting Biden. Many of them said it. And they think he's going to win, so they're pretty pleased now if if Donald Trump pulls it out, what do you think they're going to do? Well, they'll right. And it will be us. Why why are we going to burn things down? Because our candidate won.

And I just want to remind. What's your name? Davey Alba of The New York Times. You got a new story to write, Davit. I think it's a woman I can't tell anymore with the names, it's unbelievable. Patty, thank you for your call. Given what part of Philly you from, Patty?

I grew up in Jatta Park. Yeah. Where are you now? I'm in Harleysville, Pennsylvania. Very good. Well, that's not Philadelphia, but that's nice, too. I was a suburban woman that does not clutch my pearls and will fight for this president.

Well, you know what's interesting? It looks like married suburban women. The president did fine with them. It was single suburban women that he got killed with. I'm not my neighborhood. All right, Patty, God bless you. So you single women out there get married so you can become more conservative. All right, let's go to Luke Flushing, Michigan XM Satellite. Luke, how are you? Mark and Bill, well, how are you all right, sir.

Thank you. Awesome. So, yeah, I just wanted to I told your call screener I wanted to make a quick parallel between, you know, your arguments back during Spygate, you know, before everything came out to light. You know, the media kept saying the same narrative over and over. Trump has no proof. You have no proof, the same thing over. Now we're seeing a lot of smoke. I was telling the prosecutor actually worked on the classic campaign out in Baltimore in 7th District.

I have a few contacts within the Trump campaign. There's a lot of smoke. It's a lot of things happening.

And see what a lot of these judges are going to do because they're going to say, well, it's not enough to make a difference. It's not enough to make a difference, and that's why I'm saying put most of your chips down on the Article two constitutional argument and let the chips fall where they may.

Are there five justices who are going to uphold the Constitution or not?

Right. Yeah, because if you show look, we have an example of 10000 bad bill, which is enormous.

It's not enough to make a difference, you know, even though the court should still deal with it and deal with it properly. Look, thank you for your call, my friend. We'll be right back. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them, a man who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk.

AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us.

We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a C dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

Right versus left is right versus wrong, coal market eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Dana Branch, Vill, New Jersey, the great WIBC. How are you, Dana? I'm fine, Mark, I'm calling you tonight because I wanted to get a message out to the president, he needs to know that we support him in this fight. I am so upset over what's happening. People don't understand that with every illegitimate vote that is accepted, it cancels out a legitimate voter. And the president needs to know that we we want him to fight and we're not going to just turn the other cheek and we're not going to just accept the the fake Biden win.

We want him to fight for us. We want him to fight for the legitimacy of our of our voting. And I'm sorry, I'm very upset. And if he doesn't, then everything is for not OK. The whole process is a farce.

So I'm and let us not forget how they abused this president, how they abused his supporters, the things they said about us.

The things they said about us day in and day out, the things they wrote about us mocking and laughing, the the effort to destroy this man because he dared to run and dared to win.

The effort to destroy the efforts in the state's. With their lawyers and all their lawsuits to create a situation where really he couldn't win. I mean, he had a massive turnout among Republicans and and many Democrats, massive turnout for Republican in the black community and in the Hispanic communities. But still, if you're only getting 14 to 18 percent of the black vote, that means the other guy is getting a massive number. The fact of the matter is that he brought in House members.

He saved the Senate. But the Democrat machines in the city where they know they get the votes, they they use those that mail in voting and those Democrat machines in the cities to bring us where we are today.

But we need to still fight what the Pennsylvania court did.

You remember the Florida court was just as illegitimate as the Florida court, except the Rehnquist court stepped in. The Roberts court did not step in because Roberts is on the other side because he's a ham fisted political activist. Go ahead.

Well, it's not just that. It's this has been in place since the polls. Everybody's wondering why the polls were so inaccurate. It was part of the fix. I mean, how would it look if if Biden was behind in the polls and and Trump came out even close? I mean, it's obvious, based on everything that we've seen him go through the last four years, based on everything we've seen.

But you see, I'm taking it a little bit of a contrarian point of view. The polls were a disaster and they were intended to influence the voters, the media, a disaster intended to influence the voters.

And you know what? I've concluded they didn't influence the voters. What influence the voters as what we weren't paying attention to? Well, I was. Which is the litigation in this states to change the rules of the election. Because Trump, in my view, would have won, but for these changes, and I can assure you that Marc Elias and Bob Bauer and these other slip and fall Democrat ambulance chasing lawyers, they are high five each other because of the changes they were able to make.

They changed the system of voting. Since when do we wait days and days and days to get an outcome other than what Al Gore did? As I said many times in 2016, with an outcome within hours at 2:00 or 3:00 in the morning, what changed? What change was what these Democrat lawyers did in these states? That's what changed, and they and they empowered in ways that that are really beyond our imagination, these Democrat areas, even though we had record Republican and record support for Trump from from minorities, that's what did it.

We can keep chasing polls. That poll industry is dead. It's over. As far as I'm concerned, the media industry is dead and over, too, but the you know, the night of the election, it was obvious when when I heard the news report that a pipe burst and counting how to stop it is ridiculous. And then then in Philadelphia and then in Philadelphia, accounting had to stop at nine thirty. It was obvious.

And also in Atlanta, they told the Republican watchers that they weren't going to count anymore. And this isn't a conspiracy either. They've they've spoken out and they went home and the Democrats kept counting. It was it was a trick and that's a fact, Facebook. OK, so what's going to happen when we know that they did not segregate the ballots that came after?

I'm not I'm not Notre Dame. We'll see what the Supreme Court does. But obviously this order puts them front and center. It's an order following up on a previous order that told them to do the same thing. Well, my feeling is Trump had to fix NAFTA. He had to fix the wall, he had to fix the Veterans Administration. Now he's got to fix our voting while Trump can't fix it in the next three or four months.

If this is it, if he's if he's re-elected, he can fix it. But thank you for your call.

Thank you for your call. Let's see her. I want to read to you. I've got to find it.

I want to read the order that was put out. Everybody on the call. Hold on a second. Just bear with me. I'm looking. This is live radio. I'm alive.

All right. I'm getting it. Getting it. Hang in there, folks. There it is. I knew I would get it. Let me read you the exact order now it's from one justice freezing the this situation in order so that the entire court can consider taking up the entire matter.

Republican Party of Pennsylvania versus Kathy. Kathy Boockvar, secretary of Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania secretary of state, of course, she's a liberal Democrat.

All county boards of election are hereby ordered pending further order of the court to comply with the following guidance provided by the secretary of the Commonwealth on October 28 and November one. In other words, they're getting reports. That the compliance isn't being followed and the Republican Party of Pennsylvania said they're violating it. That all ballots received by mail after eight p.m. on November three be segregated and kept in a secure, safe and sealed container separate from other voted ballots.

And number two, that all such ballots, if counted, be counted separately.

Until today, this court was not informed that the guidance issued on October 28, which had an important bearing on the question whether to order special treatment, the ballots in question have been modified.

Do you understand what they're saying there? That the secretary of state violated the order. And some of these counties violated the order. The application received today also informs the court that neither the applicant nor the secretary has been able to verify that all boards are employed or complying with the secretary's guidance, which it is alleged is not legally binding on them.

Says here I am immediately referring the application to the conference, meaning the other justices, and direct that any response be filed as soon as possible.

But in any event, no later than two p.m. tomorrow, Saturday. November 7th. That sounds like a justice who's putting his foot down now, Mr. Producer? Now. If it turns out. That we can't keep the votes in Arizona, that we can't flip it, that if we're going to lose Georgia. And some of these other states, then the numbers become potentially insurmountable. I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just saying it becomes more and more difficult and the litigation will go on.

I'm not an expert on anything that's taken place in some of these other states.

I've been focused on Pennsylvania and to some extent in North Carolina.

But, Wolf, tonight, plenty of time to sort this out on Monday as well. I'll be right back. Much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them, a man who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a.m. AC U.S. stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join AMOC instead. A m a c U.S..

That's amazing. For years, the Democrats talked about Russia collusion, they started to bring it up again when Trump was leading in a number of these states.

And the same people calling for evidence today didn't have any evidence, they weren't even asked about evidence. The shocking thing. And the Democrats in the media. Hollywood and academia have created this environment, it's a very toxic environment, and you don't just snap your fingers and it goes away. People are angry about the way our president was treated.

I am. Very. So much wasted time. And so much more honestly, he could have done with his presidency in his first term. Do you think I should go full podcast one day, Mr. Producer? We had seven point one million podcasts podcast listeners in October. Download, sorry, download. That's a phenomenal number. Considering I'm on the radio three hours a day. So I wonder what you folks think if I want to a podcast. Where I can do whatever I want and say whatever I want, would you follow me on a podcast?

I'm just curious. Would you join me? I think we get 15 million downloads a month, don't you, Mr. Producer? I'm also flirting with leaving Facebook altogether. So I want to strongly encourage as many of you as I possibly can who are following me on Facebook and follow me on Twitter to move over to parler, you go to parler and it's at Mark Levin Show.

Do I have that right, Mr. Producer? Go to parler.

It's at Mark Levin Show. It is a wonderful site. They welcome everybody, including us. You don't have to look over your shoulder. There's true freedom of speech. We don't have third party left wing groups and media groups shutting us down during the course of this election. And these big tech companies, these big tech companies, they need to be confronted and addressed.

No more free rides, none. Every Friday come hell or high water in America in honor of you. Here goes. Since. All right, folks, don't forget an important life, liberty and love in a Sunday night, 8:00 p.m. Eastern. Please join us. You'll be glad you did. And I'll be on Hannity at 9:00 to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Tonight, we salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters, emergency personnel, goodnights Friday. Goodnight, Griffy. Can I say goodnight, Smokey. Goodnight, Zelda. Good night and good night. My little Barney, dad and mom and Leo. We're doing everything we can for the Republic. I know you'd be proud of us. We miss you very much. And God bless you. See you Monday. From the Westwood One podcast network.