Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike Love, and. America, I'm Mark Levin. Our number is 877 three eight one three eight one one 877 three eight one three eight one one.

This is the last live Mark Levin show until next Monday. Tomorrow, we have a wonderful guest host and with the best of and another wonderful guest host, and I'll be back on Monday.

Ladies and gentlemen, I don't care what the media say about me or the rest of them, I want you to know. This is the greatest. Greatest hijacked election in American history. State courts were involved. Secretaries of state were involved, governors were involved, all Democrats. I'm not saying they conspired together, but the lawyers who worked on these cases. The Democrat lawyers, Elias Bauer, names that some of you may be familiar with. They were the ones that organized this, they were the ones that networked this.

It involved Democrat lawyers, it involved Democrat surrogate groups, so-called voting rights groups. Working hand in glove with these Democrat officials, we have some very corrupt state supreme courts. With rogue justices, as in Pennsylvania, the five Democrats are all radicals. They're all elected. And then you have some Republican officials who are so weak, we have Republican state legislatures for the most part. That have failed to do their jobs. Then, of course, the United States Supreme Court sits there despite the fact there's a pending case and doesn't act on it because they're cowards.

They're cowards, the majority of them are maybe all of them are cowards, they're sitting back and watching to see how this plays out. In the meantime, the media juggernaut.

The propaganda, the demagoguery goes on and on and on, some of these clowns never trump Republicans and some Republicans, they buckle to this all the time of the Democrats know it. The Democrats note. These election law changes weren't intended because the people that made them believe in good government. Or they just want to do increase the number of people who would exercise their franchise. When you eliminate all these safeguards to elections. Your purpose is diabolical. It's diabolical.

And you can see in California and other states. And so this battle that goes on in the courtrooms and outside the courtrooms. Is about far more than this election, as I've said, over and over and over and over and over again. It's about the integrity of the franchise. And the fact is, 80 percent of you believe. That this election. Was that croc? Was a crack. About three percent of you believe that Joe Biden. Was elected properly as president of the United States.

And the media could care less and Joe Biden could care less, why? Because they did this, that's why. They did this. The Democrats and their lawyers and their courts and their governors and legislatures and their secretaries of state softened up the election process. Extending the vote, extending the count, massive mail and voting, no signatures, no signature comparisons, no postal marks in many of these states, some states have tried to pass massive mail and voting.

We actually mail ballots to your voting roster. And the voting roster is corrupt. It's filled with dead people. They haven't been clean for years and years and years. Despite federal law requiring it. They choose not to. So we don't know who got ballots. We don't know who sent in ballots. So many of the security measures are gone. And then you get to hear the media and you get to hear Republicans and you get to hear talk show hosts go on and on.

Well, you know, there can be a lot of fraud out there, but there has to be systemic a pattern of fraud. And you've got to show a lot that would upset hundreds of thousands of votes. And so when you go in there and you talk about what about the equal protection clause and the violations there, you have an idiot judge in central Pennsylvania said, what do you expect me to do, throw out hundreds of thousands of votes so you can't win?

When you show this a constitutional violation under the equal protection clause. The judge says he's not willing to pull the trigger. And yet and yet when you show massive fraud, it's not massive enough. The courts have failed us in some cases, the courts have participated in this scam, this is a scam election scam. I don't care what the super spreaders at The New York Times, like Shira Francon have to say. Big time super spreader, I understand.

Of lies and propaganda, you go on a Twitter site and she says, please, please re tweet, recreate my article, I work so hard on the math and I'm not very good at math as a reporter. And so we get to hear from non-leading and litigants in the media. Who tell us how the system works. Who know nothing about how the system works. A ton of fraud. First, there's no evidence of fraud. Think about this.

The lying bastards in the media that push Russia collusion and cover it up for the for the Biden crime family and on and on and on dismissed them. But think about this. There's always corruption in these elections, so when they take down the safeguards in major states and metropolitan areas and Democrat strongholds, the idea that there's not fraud or not enough fraud or we can't catch them at fraud is ridiculous. When you make clear that signatures are not required, that postmarks are not required.

How do you even find the fraud? That's like a court saying no DNA, no fingerprints. No firsthand witnesses now prove the guy is guilty. What, and then the media? Yeah, where's the evidence? Where's the evidence? The evidence is in the corruption of these institutions and what they did. To lay the groundwork for Biden. Everybody knows the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is corrupt. Those five liberal Democrats are corrupt. That they are result and what they do is as much as the Florida Supreme Court was in 2000.

Everybody knows that John Roberts, the chief justice of the United States. Duck chose not to. To exercise his constitutional responsibility. Everybody knows that. Everybody knows what went on here. Everybody. Particularly the people who did it. And now they pretend this is going on too long, this vote. This is going on till we have states now that are certifying. In Michigan. A board there certified, even though the Michigan legislature wanted to conduct an audit and an investigation, a hearing.

They blew off the Michigan legislature, even though under the Constitution, the Michigan legislature is in charge of the election system and Michigan blew them off.

Same thing just happened in Pennsylvania. With the Pennsylvania legislature, Republican wanted to hold an investigative hearing to find out what's going on, doesn't matter. The board certified blew him off. You don't hear this on TV. Look at the stock market, went up and went up for two reasons. Number one, look at this. We have a third vaccine. Number two, they see the transition is moving smoothly. How do they know that? What do they get that from?

Nowhere. They made it up. This whole damn thing has been choreographed, the Democrat Party is laughing, their lawyers think this is great. From pre-election litigation, the election post-election office of the president elect. The pressure on the courts, the political courts. The press. And the typical GOP response. And it's enough and there's no way out of this. I mean, I don't see why we can't get the vote. OK, and next time.

What about next time? Meanwhile, the Democrats, the bar's very low. Russia collusion. A phone call to the president of Ukraine. The Emoluments Clause, for God's sakes. We had a special prosecutor, we. We need to find out what Trump was doing. We need to get to the bottom of this. Forty million dollars. There is no bottom. It never happened. Well, if Russia is not going to have on Ukraine, yeah, so the country dragged into the crap hole.

But a couple of weeks on, this is too much, it's undermining democracy. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania didn't undermine democracy. Federal courts in Michigan. They didn't undermine democracy. Nevada, what the governor did there that didn't undermine democracy.

No, no, no. Come on. Pushing observers out of a Democrat stronghold so they can observe that doesn't undermine democracy. We're spreading democracy.

Count every vote. People vote two or three times, that just means they're passionate. Count those two. Catch me if you can. Catch me if you can. That's the game we're playing now. They changed the rules, the courts want nothing to do with any of this. Like that clown in Pennsylvania, they want nothing to do with catch me if you can and don't bother me, I'm a judge. Don't drag my ass into this. And there you have it.

And then you have the typical Republican maniacs, come on, let's get over this, come on. Come on. This is how you lose a country. This is how you lose a country. So we get through the next three weeks, ladies and gentlemen, the Supreme Court either doesn't act or acts improperly and. The Third Circuit doesn't act or acts and properly or what? What I just didn't have enough enough evidence and their lawyers really sucked and you should see the crap that they're there.

Is that really what's going on? No. You think every single case file by every one of these lawyers should be dismissed? How does that happen? Every one of them, yes, they haven't met a threshold, they've all met a threshold. The threshold is very low. For a motion to dismiss, to be granted. I've explained that now on Fox, I've explained it on live TV and I've explained it behind this microphone. You expect us to throw out hundreds of thousands of votes?

That's one argument they make and then number two, you got to have more than this for us to throw out hundreds of thousands. Well, which is it? That's both. The judiciary has let us down. The judiciary has let us down. Republican state legislatures have let us down. The Democrats are parting. With or without masks, they think this is fantastic. They were never going to let a 2016 happen again. And so they went into Pennsylvania.

They went into Michigan, they went into Wisconsin. They went into Georgia. They went into these key states and they sued like hell. And they get a decent decree here and there, they get a court ruling here and there, and they get pretty much what they want.

Nancy Pelosi's. Election law. And they're not done. They're going to keep it up. You want to know why? Because they see the resistance to this is pretty weak. You got a few hundred volunteer lawyers who've taken off time from their own practice and have left their own homes to fight this. You don't see any top Republican lawyers involved in this, a handful. A handful, they'd rather go on TV and talk. That's what's going on. And I don't need any law professors or former federal prosecutors or former Bush officials or whatever, you have to lecture you or me about what's taking place here.

We know what's taking place here. I'll be right back. Much love in. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings, while Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government. And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs.

Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference. At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide.

So during this season of Blessings, Hillsdale thanks you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country. To learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Let me explain something to my fellow Americans. The Washington Post, New York Times and all the other reprobates, miscreants and malcontents. You don't understand how this process works. States can file their what's called certificate of ascertainment.

He goes to the archivist of the United States, he or she husbands these certificates, holds on to them, and then when Congress meets on January six.

They're provided to a joint session of Congress. Now, the joint session of Congress is made up of the new Congress, they're sworn in on January 3rd. You see how close the House of Representatives is. And, well, you have the Georgia vote on January 5th, so we'll even see. We'll even see if those those members are seated by then, that that actually raises a very interesting question.

I'm now just noodling over, but in any event. You are not president of the United States. Until Congress says you're president of the United States. Not for the left, this will be Mark Levin's putting out a last ditch effort. I'm not making any effort. I'm telling you how this works. We have never really had states certify to electors when the state legislature is seeking to conduct an investigation because the state legislature is all powerful under this process.

I don't remember that ever happening, if it did, it's rare. Or if there's litigation ongoing, it's rare, you know, you hear people say. Professor, is former federal prosecutors another the deadline is December 12th or December 14th or December 16th, even heard a former federal judge.

That's not the deadline. The deadline to determine who the president of the United States is, is when Congress decides and counts the electors and it determines if the electors are legitimate or not. That's the deadline. I'll be right back. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings, while Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government.

And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs. Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference.

At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide. So during this season of Blessings Hillsdale, thank you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country to learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. This is Radio Free America on the Mark Levin Show, go now eight seven seven three eight one thirty eight 11.

You know, I watch these I read these pieces on the the House how the Republicans did so well. Well, one of the reasons is Kevin McCarthy was brilliant strategy tactician. But then we have like 22 members of the House on this or candidates running, Mr. Producer, on this program. Was there another national program that brought on House members one after another? No. So I would just point out to maybe Byron and some of the others. If you listen to the show, maybe you do, I don't know.

We decided because I had talked to Ted Cruz and Cruz is a very good tactician. He said we need to focus more on the house and we spoke about it. And I said, yeah, so I brought on House member after House member after House member and I would say half the two thirds of them. One. And the ones that lost. It's too bad they were outstanding, outstanding, and these are conservatives. Solid conservatives. So, of course, that'll never get mentioned, not even in the conservative media.

And I want to thank you, LaVena, it's out there. We were number one on cable on Sunday. As we were the Sunday before, as we were the Sunday before. Again, I have to mention it, not because of me, because of you, if you weren't watching, I wouldn't be number one. What I. But it's because you want to hear not all the static, not all the repetition in the garbage. You really want to think about and see what's going on?

That's why. Now, before we get to our sponsor, Mr. Producer, I want you to play COP one, I want to prove a point cut. One is Joe Biden at a press conference today acting like he's already president. The United States, nobody says but me. Excuse me. We have one president at a time now. You wouldn't talk before and now you won't shut the hell up. CAT1 one, go to this team. I thank them for accepting this call to service.

Are you kidding? They've been scratching at the dog like cats at the door. They're slobbering all over this.

Go ahead, their families.

I thank you all for your sacrifice. You know, we could do we could not do this without you, in my view. Together, these public servants will restore America globally, its global leadership and its moral leadership, and will ensure that our service members, diplomats and intelligence professionals can do their job of free of politics and not on repair. They'll also reimagine American foreign right there.

Reimagine, you hear this all the time, don't you, reimagine? Reimagine American foreign policy, reimagining, policing, reimagining what do they keep using that word? You know, there was a professor. She's gone now by the name of Jean Anion AMCON, and she wrote several books on Marxism and neo Marxism in education. She was a big believer, as are many.

They use the classroom to spread the ideology of Marx, the American style of Marx. That's what she did and that's what many of these tenured professors do. And in her writings, because I'm studying them, she wrote a book called Marks in Education Jean Anion. And I just picked it up. Off my desk, I already read it, already went through it, but I remember her using the word reimaging and reimagining over and over and over again in her book, and so I just grabbed it.

Here's page ninety nine. Reimagining economic change and institutions as potentially oppositional. Does not by itself bring social change, and she goes on with her blather. Reimagining. Reimaging these words are now being pushed into Joe Biden's speeches. They were put into Kamala Harris speeches, Kamala Harris was then using them on the stump. Because reimagining in particular. Reimagine, reimagining. Is a soft word. Doesn't send up any signals. So, yeah, maybe we can let's reimagine let's use our imaginations.

So, Don, where the neo Marxists in the Marxists have been using for decades. And you're now hearing it from members of the Democrat Party. Neo Marxists, a Marxist who are huge and using this in our colleges and universities. Now you're hearing Democrats use it. So he wants to reimagine American foreign policy and national security for the next generation, God forbid. And the last line here is and of course, nobody in the media polls points it out in the press.

Folks, this guy was vice president for eight years, he was a senator for almost 40 years, and now he's talking about reimagining American foreign policy and national security.

Reimagining. What is this, a clown show? What is this reimagining? Guy's got 50 years in government. You don't turn to him to reimagine anything, you know who is reimagining not in neo Marxist Marxist sense was Trump.

He reimagined, quote unquote, foreign policy, national security, economic policy, immigration policy. He did a lot of reimagining. And they're saying now let's get back involved globally. Trump never said, let's not be involved globally, that would be absurd. He said, put America first when you're involved globally. Put America first, not the institutions of the globalists, not the U.N., not this group or that group, because they get around what we call representative government and our and our constitutional institutions.

That's why Kerry and Biden and the rest of them are so anxious to sign on to agreements, not even make treaties, sign onto agreements to undermine the treaty clause, because now they can make deals and set policies that are extra constitutional, that avoid the voter altogether and undermine American sovereignty all together. It's time to reimagine, you see. Marxists and fascists have a funny way of reimagining, don't they? So I want to point out the words language means everything, I want to point out the nomenclature they're using.

This is a word the neo Marxists in the Marxists have been using in our classrooms and in their writings. Reimagine, reimagine, they think they're doing that Beatles song, you know. Just reimagine. It's this utopian paradisiacal notion. Reimagine a country in which everybody was equal. Everybody are in the same income. Everybody was smiling and. Working together in peace and love reimagine. And yet this is the party of totalitarianism. This is the party of the Confederacy and slavery.

This is the party. Of segregation. But, Mark, don't forget, it's also the part I'm not forgetting anything I'm underscoring. Some very serious problems with the Democrat Party, you know, it's funny when Democrats today attack our history, in many respects they're attacking their own party's history.

But they don't want to admit it. They don't want to admit it. The Democrats announced after the 2000 election that George W. Bush was an illegitimate president, and that's the way they viewed him for two terms.

And I think it was absolute cowardice on George W. Bush's part not to enter this election and support Donald Trump, I understand his hard feelings. But so what? The country's at stake. And so they also. Tried to create. An illegitimate reimaging of the Donald Trump victory. So for the Democrats, the last two Republican presidents were illegitimate, but their presidents now never illegitimate. They're fantastic. Well, I'm here to announce right now. For The New York Times, The Washington Post and all the other reprobates, miscreants and malcontents.

As far as I'm concerned, Joe Biden is an illegitimate. President elect in the office of the president elect, I'm mocking them. Illegitimate. The greatest scam in electoral history. And the left and the professors and their columnists and the clowns in their newsrooms, they don't want this. Addressed. And fixed, which is why they they are putting public pressure on all public institutions and public officials appointed or elected. To throw in the towel. Which is why they don't want the United States Congress to have the final word.

Or the state legislatures to have the final word. Because now, if you actually uphold the Constitution, it's you. Who are seeking a coup? It's you. And notice how few reporters for The Washington Post, The New York Times, the Constipated News Network, MSNBC and all the other frauds. Notice how few reporters they have in the field. In the city's. To find out what took place at 4:00 a.m.. And five a.m. and three a.m. what took place?

They don't want to know, they ain't looking, it doesn't matter. And then when the president of the United States meets with members of the Michigan legislature, you know what the reporters say? He's pressuring them. He's pressuring them. To do what, to pick the electors, he's pressuring them. So they come out and say he didn't pressure us to do anything White House. No, he didn't. He didn't pressure anybody to do anything, but they kept reporting it.

It didn't matter. Because there are liars. They're liars, they're sleaze. That's what they are, that's why you hate them. I had to write an entire book on this, I must get an ulcer called on Freedom of the Press. Most of you have it, most of you read it. Well, that's what's going on. That's exactly what's going on. I'll be right back. Much love in. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings, while Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government.

And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs. Perhaps you receive in Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference.

At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide. So during this season of Blessings, Hillsdale thanks you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country. To learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

The American people, this team will make us proud to be Americans.

Excuse me, what a jackass. We're already proud to be Americans, you jerk. We don't need Joe Biden to make us proud to be Americans. And then they got John D. student Kerry and. And a whole bunch of leftists, but don't worry, because Kamala Harris announced that this cabinet, they already have a cabinet, looks like America. The problem is it might look like America. But at things like Castro. If things like Putin. It's things like, gee.

So there's nothing wrong with having a cabinet that looks like America. The problem is we need a cabinet that thinks like America. Plus, they're not in the cabinet yet. One president at a time. I'm pleased to report I just saw on just the news John Solomon's outstanding site. The Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona, the Republican legislatures are holding hearings. Into the voter activity that took place, this is exactly why. When when ascertainment of certificates of ascertainment are signed off by these bureaucrats and sent to the archivist of the United States before matters are resolved in the state.

It creates problems because the state legislature is cut out of the process, these phony pseudo constitutionalists on cable TV really need to educate themselves and stop giving phony information to the public based on what they read in the press. If they have hearings and they find that there is something wrong or something of that sort. The electors have already been certified and sent to the archivist of the United States, then what happens? Then what happens? That's why you're supposed to wait.

Have a little bit of patience. What's the problem? The problem is they're trying to steamroller this whole damn thing. Judges are the media. Clearly, Biden and the Democrats. And now the bureaucrats and some of the phony Republicans, let's get it over with. Come on, come on. Let's get it over with. Not so fast. And so in this respect, I want to salute those legislatures because we need a record, we need a historical record and we need a record to take into 2022 and 2024 people.

And we need to fix this. We need to get back to in-person voting. And how shall we do that when we have corrupt courts like the Pennsylvania Supreme Court? How are we going to do it? They don't tell you that, well, you got to fight it, you got to fight it now, you can't wait to the next battle. How many more elections? But the stock market went up. Let me tell you something. God forbid, if Biden's the president, the stock market's not going to stay up, you ought to see his tax plan.

It is a killer. It is going to kill American enterprise. It's going to kill American competition. It's going to kill our businesses. All these union guys, most of whom I think voted for Trump. But then you're in for our you're in for a rude awakening. And even today, the media continue to try and destroy this platform called Parla. Why? Because it's actually open. They actually believe in free speech. They don't file notices, they don't punish adults.

People who are posting things. See, we conservatives, we like liberty. So I'm going over to Parlette because it believes in liberty, Facebook is tyrannical. Google is tyrannical. What else, Twitter is tyrannical, they've left me alone for some reason when we're not sure why. But is it just a matter of time?

The Washington Post, The New York Times, all these left wing phony media outlets, they're tyrannical.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here, he's here. Now broadcasting live from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike. Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Let me address this. This is Radio Free. You're going to hear it straight from me. And unlike the illegitimate office of the president elect, America first.

So as is reported here, Life News.com, actually, Life News.com, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona legislatures will hold hearings on election fraud.

Now. In Pennsylvania, a Republican legislature and a Democrat executive branch in Michigan, you have a Republican legislature and a Democrat executive branch.

In Arizona, you have a Republican legislature and a Democrat executive branch. Now, what happened in these three states? Pennsylvania. Michigan and Arizona. The Democrats who run the executive branch, the secretaries of states, the governors and so forth, they made sure. That the electoral votes were certified for Joe Biden, even while all three of those state legislatures have said we want to conduct hearings. So they did it quickly and you'll see all over the media, even our favorite cable channels say Pennsylvania certified for Biden, hey, Michigan certified for Biden.

Yay, George.

Hold on now. I remember when I told you. The legislature's in charge, they wanted to hold hearings. All three of these states before the Democrats who run the executive branch and run these different committees and so forth.

Certified. But because they knew in these states that the Republicans wanted to hold hearings in the legislature, they went ahead and certified as quickly as they could. They didn't have to certify today, yesterday or last week. So the Democrats. In the executive branch, whether it's of some commission, some board, the secretary of state, some states, the governor signed off. Certifying the Biden electors and sent them off to Washington. Even though the legislatures in all three states wanted to hold hearings.

And so Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona, the Republican legislatures are going to go through with hearings. And if they believe they find violations of state law by courts or what have you or fraud or what have you. Now, what happens? I suspect what they'll do is they'll send a letter. Or some kind of resolution or something. To the archivist's to be delivered to the Congress when the time comes. Now, let me show you how the media is going to treat this.

Because remember, the media are totalitarian. Their tyrannical they're on a mission, they're salivating. It's like it's like they have rabies, I say. They're hot to trot. They think it's all sealed. They don't believe in the Constitution, except they can use it to advance the ball. That's it. Those electors should not have been certified until these legislatures were done, they didn't even get to begin to hold hearings. They're talking about one or two day hearings that wasn't, you know, didn't matter.

So the way a real reporter would report this is. The executive branch in these states. Certify the electors for Biden, the Democrats did. Before the Republican legislatures could hold their hearings. What you're going to hear instead is the opposite, these states already certified and now the Republicans. Are trying to. Upset the system. They're obstructing. They're trying to destroy the will of the people. And no doubt they're doing it at the president's direction. Now, what's going to happen to our stock market now?

Now what's going to happen to a peaceful transition of power? Now, John Kerry won't be the special envoy for climate change. What are we going to do? What are we going. This isn't supposed to happen. These legislatures, they're filled with hacks. They're not allowed to do this. Working on behalf of my God. That's how they're going to report it. That's how they're going to report. They'll all be glum faced. Oh, my God.

Then they'll go to, let's see, John Bolton. What do you think, and Trump is real, so be OK. Chris Christie, what do you think? Can I have a doughnut? No, no, no. Chris Christie. What do you think? The worst lawyers in America and. OK, Mitt Romney. What do you think Trump is trash. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Look at this. Michael Steele. Do you know how to think?

That's right. They'll go right down the usuals and then some of the new ones, Adam King said, What do you think?

I'm really embarrassed for the country. I really am. Oh, who else can we talk to? One schmuck after another in line, they like their headline, so they want to be seen as very thoughtful. We have a system, the system is being blown out, it's being blown out in the States now, we have a process. The process is being blown up by these Democrats and the executive branches of these Republican legislature controlled states. The legislatures are being cut out by the state courts.

They're being cut out by federal courts. They're being cut out by governors. They're running with the ball as fast as they can to certify. And the legislature is the last one. They don't even have a say anymore.

And then they're hoping the presidency, the Senate. Then they're going to really sharpen their knives. OK? OK, now that we're kind of controlling the vote, we need to always control the vote. Let's go after the Electoral College that's encourage states to have the national popular vote.

Let's blow out these red states that blow out the farmers and the ranchers and the and everybody that works with them. Let's get rid of these guys. They'll do what we say, whether they like it or not.

So we'll destroy the Electoral College because every vote should count now, will destroy the Electoral College. Then we'll destroy the filibuster rule, we destroy the filibuster rule that will immediately pass legislation to expand the Supreme Court and packet.

With five Ruth Bader Ginsburg types, that's what we'll do. Well, put in put in people like that. Then we'll expand the Senate, every vote should count, everybody should be represented, will expand the Senate. Two seats from Puerto Rico and two seats from the District of Columbia, by the way, footnote on the District of Columbia. You would have to amend the Constitution, but they won't care because the District of Columbia is carved out in the Constitution.

No, no, we're not amending anything. So the the members, the Democrats are really. John Bolton kind of stole my line, but he's into that they're really the rioters in the streets without the Molotov cocktails. They're worse than their. They're worse than. And I guess it was too much to ask George W. Bush to help out, I guess was too much for John Bolton to be loyal, I guess was too much for Chris Christie. They keep his big fat pie hole shut just for two minutes.

Unbelievable. And so these state legislatures. Which have the primary role under our constitutional system are being cut out of the system. And where is the United States Supreme Court, where does the United States Supreme Court today? Where is it? There's a case sitting there. It's collecting dust. Where's all John Roberts? Remember him, Reagan guy worked at the Department of Justice. Remember, they tried to use a few memos he wrote against them all. John Mann.

He was a Firebreather. We're joined now. John's just like Harry Blackmun and. Anthony Kennedy. And all the others. He's just another. Another also ran. We could sure use. William Rehnquist right now. But unfortunately, we have John Roberts. The Supreme Court could have put it into all this early on, they've made a mess of things. And now they're the target. They're the target. The Democrats hold the White House and take the Senate, the Supreme Court will change forever.

And history, John Roberts will hold you in part accountable for it. You're not so smart. You're not so clever. Where they wear black robe or not? You still flesh and blood. And I guess brain matter. I'll be right back. Much love in. Folks, this election is not over until all the legal votes have been counted, no matter what the corporate media incessantly try to shove down your throat, this is why it's never been more important for you to subscribe to Levin TV on the Blaze TV network, just like you.

I am sick of the lies. I'm sick of the censorship. I'm sick of the kowtowing to the power hungry Democrat Party and their left wing Praetorian Guard media.

There's a battle for our republic going on and we're on the front lines every day fighting the good fight for the whole country, including you. So if you're not currently a subscriber, let's make sure you sign up today at Lhevinne TV.com. Subscribe now and receive a special thirty dollars off your annual subscription. That's thirty dollars off with a promo code. Lhevinne 20-20. That's eleven. 20-20 Blaze TV Network is the largest network of free speech, pro-American news and entertainment bar none.

Come join us today and see why. That's Lhevinne TV.com. Levin TV.com.

We had Dr. Robert Epstein on our Life, Liberty and Levin Fox program way back in September 2019 when he alerted the nation really for the first time on the national scene to what Google was up to with its algorithms and so forth and.

We wanted to have you back last month, you really weren't ready, Doctor. I think you're ready somewhat now. And I want to thank you for coming back.

Dr. Robert Epstein, a senior research psychologist at the American Institute of Behavior and Technology. How are you, sir?

Pretty good. How are you doing? I'm OK. What can you tell us about number one? You have people in the field. And number two, what you're picking up initially from Google. Google?

Sure, sure. Well, we we got very ambitious this year. We back in 2016, we when we first started to learn how to do monitoring, we had 95 field agents, we call them in 24 states this year. We we had 733 field agents strategically located in three of the key swing states, Arizona, Florida and North Carolina. And we preserved more than 500000 ephemeral experiences. Those are those short lived experiences that the tech companies use to manipulate people and that are normally lost forever.

And we preserved them so we could look at them and see what was going on and whether there was bias or manipulation or targeting. And we've only just begun digging in. But we already found some very disturbing things about what Google and other companies were showing people in the weeks and months leading up to this election. Mm hmm.

Now, when you talk about these ephemeral experiences, these are the things that these companies kind of flash up, draw you to a particular place or suggest that you vote, that sort of thing, right?

Yes. Like search results, search suggestions, news feeds, targeted messages. These are things that don't leave any paper trail. So you can't go back in time and see what, you know, search results. People were shown, but they have a tremendous impact on people's opinions and votes and these companies know it. One of the leaks from Google to The Wall Street Journal about two years ago was a conversation among people of Google in which they're discussing how can they use ephemeral experiences to change people's views about Trump's travel ban.

So they know this. And this is what I've been studying in my experimental research since 2013. And this is what these monitoring systems are all about, actually capturing, preserving these ephemeral experiences that are normally lost forever.

So you have the most massive team. Doing the most massive amount of research, these these half a million examples that you've ever had, you're starting to to to make determinations on the data that you've collected. What does the early information show you?

It's showing three things at this point. Number one, it's showing in Google search results, but not Bing or Yahoo! And that's important. And Google search results. It's showing a very strong liberal bias in all 10 search positions on the first page of search results when people are conducting election related searches. Now, I have to add, we deliberately in this in this kind of work, we only use neutral search terms, the kind that undecided voters would use.

But our our panel of field agents consists of a politically diverse group. So in other words, we have people we know are Democrats or Republicans. We've got independents. We have people who call themselves other. So they're using these neutral search terms to see what Google is going to give them back. And we're finding very strong liberal bias on Google, and this is very important as well. And no matter what the demographic group, everyone's getting search results with liberal bias, in fact, are conservatives.

We're getting search results that were more liberally biased then the search results are liberals are getting.

That's very, very interesting. Now, anything on Facebook? Did you did you take a look at them by any chance?

We, in fact, are monitoring Facebook. We're also monitoring YouTube. We're still monitoring, by the way, because we've now moved into Georgia for the runoffs.

The we have so much data that, you know, it's really going to take a long time to to look at it. But Facebook, the the possibility there is targeted messaging, in other words, sending, let's say, a vote reminder, you know, just the people who lean in one direction politically. That's the real threat of Facebook. And we did find a smoking gun. We found exactly that kind of targeting. And the homepage of Google, we found for a period of days we found vote reminders going only to liberals.

Well, that is about the most extreme kind of manipulation there is because think about it. If they were doing that for months, that would affect who would vote, who would register to vote. That's that's an astonishingly brazen kind of manipulation. But during those days, not a single one of our conservative field agents received the vote. Reminder, just the liberals said. Now, the good news is that on October 29th, when we started to go public with some of this stuff, we got Google to back off.

We got them to stop that particular manipulation. And so beginning midnight on that night, that was they were sending those reminders to everyone finally.

But, you know, with all the earlier and earlier voting, mail and voting, they could do a lot of damage before that, I think, don't you?

Yes. We have actually calculated at this point that if those manipulations said there's a place for a period of months, they would have shifted bare minimum. Absolutely. Bare minimum, six million votes in one direction again, without leaving a paper trail with no one knowing that they're doing this. This is unbelievable.

I shouldn't be shocked because you said last time I had one on my Fox show, you said this is what they do. This is what's going on. And now you're finding out they're still doing it. And you may find out it's even worse by the time you're done.

Well, I told you what I. Yes. What we felt they had been doing. But I never expected, first of all, to be able to collect this much data and preserve this much evidence, because that's what this is. And I didn't expect to see, you know, manipulations so brazen, literally, you know, targeted a vote, reminders that that's that's incredible.

Doctor, I'd like to carry over the bottom of the hour for a few minutes if you're available. Sure. We're talking to Dr. Robert Epstein, who is really a top.

You know, you're a top behavioral, this type of program. Liberty's voice market love when I talk with that voice now eight, seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Now, Robert Epstein, I kind of discovered you me, just me a year ago because you wrote a book about Google.

Well, you wrote articles and you were on top of this and I said, who is this gentleman? You are very good at what you do. And I want people to know you have a site called Stop Big Tech. Now, Dotcom, stop. Big Tech now, dotcom. And you folks can go there and support this effort, I hope you will.

So I want to get into this a little bit more deeply, you have hundreds and hundreds of field agents, you've taken hundreds of thousands of dollars of or have protected hundreds and thousands of pieces of evidence involving Google and your and your your unequivocal conclusion is, yes, they pushed people toward voting for Joe Biden and the Democrats.

Correct.

Do I have that right or not? Absolutely correct.

And that the the evidence is it's as clear as could possibly be.

And I was contacted when I first started to make some of this known. I was contacted by one of the state AGs, but also by Senator Ron Johnson, a couple other people. And they said to me, you've got to go into Georgia. So we're doing that right now to try to do the same thing with the runoffs. Except this time we're hoping by by letting these companies know, letting Google know that we're in Georgia, letting them know now that we're in Georgia, we're hoping we can get them to back way off really fast so that we have at least, you know, the remnant of a free and fair election, the the usual media outlets.

How are they treating you? Are they embracing any of this race?

Are you sure they can use are you kidding? To the extent that I'm even being mentioned anymore, they're slaughtering me.

Hmm. Yeah, this is the nature of the beast, they have been asked to look at any evidence ever, of course, they're not even fact checking. They don't. They don't. I don't understand this at all. I'm not I'm not a conservative. I don't have a conservative bone in my body. I do not understand this abuse.

Well, it doesn't matter because they're not really liberals, are they? They have they have a totalitarian mindset at this point, I don't know what's going on, it doesn't make any sense to me because this is information, you know, that should be of interest to everyone. I mean, a lot of us have kids, grandkids. I mean, we should be concerned that, you know, a couple of big tech companies are deliberately, strategically influencing thinking and behavior and votes on a massive scale.

And by the way, they're not just doing it here. They're doing it around the world. They're impacting three billion people every single day.

And do you find it interesting, Robert? I call you Robert. I feel like I'm not sure why I'm sure. Do you find it interesting how they're going after this little entrepreneur startup called Parler? They want to destroy it. Well, you know, I have some mixed feelings about parler, I have to I have to admit, because, you know, we're already a divided nation. And on this issue, you know, I stand with the founding fathers.

And, of course, you're you're you're a historian. You know a lot about these things.

But, you know, they they didn't like the idea of a lot of parties and especially of a two party system. They thought it would divide the nation, interfere with people's ability to think clearly.

They did start it. Well, the point is, I, I, I think that the parlor, you know, is attracting mainly conservatives who are understandably distraught with Facebook and Twitter is the thing you know about.

Parlor parlor never came to me. I went to parler and I'll tell you why I'm not there. Management. I just moved over there. If you go on my Facebook site, Robert.

About every third or fifth posting I put in there, somebody at Facebook makes a comment. And then some third party organization, which they say are our referees and they're not referees, they're left wing, they go in there and they start banning and they start doing other things. And so you look around, you say, well, where can I go?

Well, parlor is where I'm going to go. And by the way, they don't prevent liberals from going there or radicals or anything else from going there.

So I think it's it's it's the opposite.

In other words, I think conservatives really are attracted to free speech and ideas and we're prepared to debate them and duke it out, whereas I think I won't even call them liberals.

These are radical leftists who demand conformity. Like in your case, they don't want to debate you. They don't want to hear what you have to say. They want to kill you, crush you.

I cannot disagree with what you're saying, but I think we have a big problem in this country, too, and that, you know, we are divided into two parallel Americas now. And, you know, I don't think the solution to that is to create new platforms that attract, you know, people who are on one track already. I just don't think that's a solution to the problem.

Well, I think we've got to find out ways to compete with these these mass, this mass, this this oligopoly.

And it's extremely dangerous. I agree with you there. And I have proposed in various writings, I've proposed ways to to to constrain these companies and remove the powers that they have of surveillance, of censorship and manipulations. We have to do that. I agree with you there. And you're talking mainly about the censorship issue, and I agree with 100 percent.

And by the way, there's this surveillance thing is a big deal. Sure. And they're taking our data and they're selling it. And most people don't even realize, well, they're doing more than just selling it. They're sharing it with intelligence agencies, not just here around the world. They're building digital models of us and our kids to predict what we're going to do and say and think and what we're going to buy. It's much more than just selling.

It's you know, it's extremely dangerous. And people have no idea how extensive the surveillance is. I mean, it's it's not just when you use Gmail or you use Chrome, by the way, you're crazy. If you do either if you have an Android phone and Google's listening all the time. The problem is much bigger. I mean, if you have a nest, smart thermostat, Google bought that company a few years ago. They put microphones in it without telling anyone.

The newest versions of the thermostat have cameras in them. So you're surrounded by surveillance tools and most of them are in the hands of Google and less, less. A little bit less so in the hands of Facebook. You know, it's it's outrageous. The surveillance is completely out of control. Obviously, the censorship is everyone knows that. And the manipulations. I mean, that's what I study in my research. These are three huge problems that are present, a terrible threat to democracy, to free speech and even to human autonomy.

And, you know, there's no one in the world more concerned about them or probably more knowledgeable about them than I am. And there are two things that can be done. And that's but the question is, is anything going to be done, you know, with Washington literally being controlled now, moving forward into the Biden administration, being controlled by the tech companies who who were determined to make sure Trump was thrown out. Are we going to be moving forward, making progress on these issues or are we doomed?

Well, Robert, apparently the in the office of the president elect, these big tech companies are all over it, all over the Biden operation right now.

Oh, you have you have no idea. You have absolutely no idea. Trump's excuse me, Obama's second term started with Obama shutting down the anti-trust investigation against Google. By the end of his second term, six federal agencies were being run by former Google executives as chief technology officer, former Google executive, you know, they took over D.C. and that's going to happen on a scale that we've never seen before. As soon as Biden is in office and then all of the investigations that are ongoing against Google, which started in the Trump administration, all of them are going to be shut down.

You don't have any insight into Amazon, do you? I have some ideas. Yes, I mean, it seems to me they have their fingers in everything, Meirong. They do, and and if and the Amazon Alexa device I made my eldest son throw it away, you know, is listening all the time. So Amazon is getting there, getting into the surveillance game big time. And, of course, they're just taking over our economy. So, yeah, Amazon is a serious threat.

It's not the biggest threat right now through the biggest threat is Google. But is it? Yeah.

Isn't it interesting that President Trump, a man who comes out of business, really no government background whatsoever.

He's looking at these things and he is focusing in on these massive companies and he's saying they're too big, they have too much power. He's talked to Google and Facebook and Twitter and Amazon and so forth, and then the Liberals.

They say they're they're not strong enough, they're not censoring enough, they're not targeting their political opponents. What's happened to civil liberties in this country? They used to be groups that believed in it.

I don't hear a lot of spinning, I'm just telling you, my head is spinning, I'm looking at actual data every day showing me the extent of the manipulations that are occurring, the extent of the censorship. I've plus I've developed methods for measuring these things, proving that these things are occurring. Why am I the only one doing this? Why did a prominent D.C. attorney call me up a few days ago? Called me up more than once, by the way, urging me to go into hiding.

Really? Yes. Wow. Well, listen, you come back any time you want, and when you have new information, I hope you'll let us know. OK, Robert. Well, do we get it? We got a nice, big, far reach here. And.

And send me a send people, please, to stop big tech yellow dot com, because we went into Georgia at the request of one of the state AGs, Jeff Landry and Senator Ron Johnson. And we did it without funding. So, you know, on a hope and a prayer. So we have to get the funding now to make sure we I have posted it on my sites you're talking to.

Thank you. Tremendous patriots out here are very concerned about all this and over the holiday.

And I hope starting this evening, starting after this call, you'll go on my sites, Mark Levin Show Parler, Mark Levin Show Twitter, Mark Levin Show, Facebook. And just so you know, Robert, at the end of the year, I'm out of Facebook.

I've had enough of them. Good for you. All right, my friend. Good luck. Have a great Thanksgiving.

Thanks for your help. I really appreciate it. Same to you. You bet. I like this gentleman a lot, we've talked him in the past. We gave him a national form 14, 15 months ago, people were shocked at what he had to say. We tried to get him back on a couple of weeks ago. He's not ready because he was still looking at some of the data and you can you can hear the integrity that the man has.

It is frightening as we enter the Christmas season with all its blessings, Hillsdale College thanks you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings. Since 1844, Hillsdale has provided the kind of education essential to preserving free government. The college extends its educational mission beyond the campus on behalf of liberty, through a variety of outreach programs. And perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Hillsdale excellent free online courses or attended one of their free regional events.

As you've heard, Hillsdale refuses to take one penny of government money.

Now, this independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core principles, learning character, faith and freedom without government interference. There's never been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers. So. Gesundheit, so during this season of Blessings, Hillsdale, thank you for your partnership and extending its mission to the country to learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for the Hillsdale Dotcom and for Hillsdale Dotcom lytvyn for Hillsdale Dotcom. We'll be right back.

Love in. Wait till you hear what I have for you next hour, wait till you hear what I have for you next hour.

This is holiday season. Feel like it's been a long time coming thus to me. But make it worth the wait. Send the perfect gift, send yourself something special. Bring families together for a delicious Omaha steak feast, a holiday feast.

Right now, you can get the deluxe grillers assortment, which includes perfectly aged, top sirloins, juicy chicken breasts, yummy sides and their famous apple tartlets.

Plus, when you order this mouth-watering package, you'll get for free burgers and a free digital meat thermometer, so go to Omaha Steaks, Starcom and code Levin Levien into the search bar and ordered today.

This exclusive offer is available only to my listeners and has a discount of over 50 percent Omaha Steaks isn't just steak. It's a fantastic gift to share the joy of the season. Don't forget, when you order the deluxe grillers assortment, you'll get for free Omaha steaks, burgers and a free digital meat thermometer with my code lhevinne with my code lytvyn.

So you have to use that. You go to Omaha Steaks, Dotcom Code Leevi and I would encourage you to do that this evening. Right away. That's Omaha Steaks, Dotcom and a code lytvyn. So you can get this great deal with the discounts. It's a deal you won't find anywhere else. Omaha Steaks, Dotcom and code lhevinne elevon. I'm not trying to depress you.

I'm just trying to alert you. You want depression, you watch the regular news outlets. John Kerry, now, what is this climate change stuff all about? It's about. Undermining American sovereignty and Americans, America's institutions, it's also an attack on our economic system. It's the rest of the world trying to drag down the American capitalist system.

This is why it amazes me when you have. Some of the union bosses in this country. Endorsing these false. The environmental movement is anti-union, it's anti worker, it's anti white collar, blue collar, no collar, it's anti assembly line, it's anti smokestack industries.

It Santoyo automobile truck, airplane. That's the environmental. Industry and the environmental industry. And the working class in this country have almost nothing in common. Now, when you read about the so-called climate change movement, it is a movement that was imported in the United States from Europe as all of these fascistic or communistic movements are. It was imported into the United States in the early 70s, mid 70s, it didn't really take hold. You had people like Naomi Wolf, whose ultra leftist.

Naomi Wolf wrote, and I've talked about this that said. You know, we want to eliminate capitalism, she was raised by a couple of reds, she said we want to eliminate capitalism, she said.

So if we can do it through the environment, we can do it through climate change, then we do it, in other words. We use whatever vehicle we can, so they use all the vehicles, all the vehicles you hear about. You know, systemic racism. The wage gap. The environment. Whatever it is, so all these vehicles are in play at once and all have the same thing in common to destroy that which exists because it's unjust, it's not equal.

It's inhuman. It's not compassionate. But when you take these individuals alone, John Kerry's an idiot. He doesn't know anything. He's married in the world twice. He was elected. He armed the Iranians. He undermined the Israelis to undermine our country. And under Biden, should he become president, carries back. So are all these other losers. What these people don't understand is and they don't want to understand they're ideologues. Is a president, Trump never said we shouldn't be involved in international affairs.

He never said we should turn our back on the global system. He said we need to make sure that this is managed better and that our top priority is the American citizenry. He did not want to export our sovereignty. I talk about this and liberty and tyranny also, but that said, that's exactly what these people want to do. The credibility of our countries had plummeted because of Trump. We're going to bring America back the people who hate America.

Of course, he got Martha Raddatz, who was big with the Obamas, who she invited to her wedding. Foreign policy picks are not political people. Unbelievable. The throw that the press is on the. From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by Amay Association of Mature American Citizens. Now, over two million conservative members, Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom.

Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Armacost U.S. Join me here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. He's seven seven three eight one three eight one one, Martha Raddatz is at ABC News, Andrea Mitchell at MSNBC, Yamaichi Alcindor is, I believe, at NPR.

I want you to listen to these people. It's sickening. First, Martha Raddatz cuts seven go. This is about the least flashy team you could possibly get. They are deeply experienced, they are humble and they are lifelong public servants. When I look at that group up there and let's put John Kerry aside, because as we know, he was the Democratic nominee for president once. But they are not political. They are just career people. They have worked together for many years.

I remember Jake Sullivan at the at the side of Hillary Clinton when she was secretary of state all the time. And as they say, they really do reflect America.

This is Biden announcing his cabinet before he is the president elect. Announcing his cabinet, did you hear what she said? I'm telling you, folks. It's unbelievable. Now let's go to Andrea Mitchell and Melasti had tipped news busters, go ahead. They are now being told that it is not going to be political. And Joe Biden is saying these are people this is a team who is going to tell me this team will tell me what I need to know, what not what I want to know.

That is a big change.

Big change. They all think exactly the same way, but look like it to me. Raddatz, Mitchell, now this. How do you pronounce your name? I don't know, Yamchi alcindor, right? Yamaichi, Cindy. Let's listen to her on MSNBC today. Go ahead. The other thing I'll just say is I was talking to a Democrat who just said this also felt like the Avengers felt like we're being rescued from this craziness that we've all lived through from the last four years.

And now here are the superheroes to come and save us all.

The superheroes to save us, you want to know why? They object to any effort to get to the bottom of what took place in this election, why they perpetrated the Russia fraud while they perpetrated everything they did, they have disgraced this country.

They have disgraced themselves, but they don't know it yet because they live in a bubble. I want to read you something from Michael Walsh. It was a brilliant man. And I believe this was at EPIC. I'm trying to remember, I think Song says the republic has been failing for nearly half a century, the great capital city was riven by factions. Graft and corruption were rife. Political opponents were subjected to violence in the streets. Elections were decided by intimidation and bribed electors.

The tradition that held the country together for centuries, hung by a thread, dynasty seesawed. Finally, two mighty opposing forces faced each other across a river, and then Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon. Karl Marx, the Avatar Modern Evil, like to say that history repeats itself the first time as tragedy, the second time as a farce. As another cliche has it, history doesn't repeat, but it sometimes rhymes, but there's nothing farcical about the American political situation at the moment or anything particularly lyrical.

President Donald Trump and the forces are real change in contemporary politics and are now locked in a death struggle with a permanent bipartisan fusion party, the unholy alliance of radical Democrats and milquetoast Republicans who have profited mightily from the business as usual of Washington practically since Eisenhower left office in 1961. All Americans should care about the Constitution, should wish them well, even if they cannot wish them success. Trump's media asserted defeat three weeks ago and his adamant conviction the election was stolen from him by a perfect storm of unnecessarily liberalized changes to voting laws, traditional big city Democrat political operation finagled voting machines, statistical statistical improbabilities ballots of uncertain provenance and actual vote changing all alleged at this point and not yet proven.

Much of it actually has been have caused one of the biggest political crises in U.S. history. And the president's refusal to back down and concede defeat while adhering to the only norms that count his rights under our Constitution, a Republican form of government has brought him nothing but criticism from this fusion party, which was stung by his surprise victory in 2016 and has spent the past four years trying to ensure a black swan event like that will never happen again by any means necessary.

Why don't you just play nice, accept the verdict and give up? They insist this is rich coming from those who refuse to accept the outcome of 2016, proclaim themselves the resistance, and have been waging guerilla warfare against Trump and his voters ever since. Democrats and their partisans have concocted the Russian collusion hoax and the imaginary Ukrainian impeachment. Some have resorted to violence, such as the armed attack on Republican salons in 2017 by disaffected Democrats that left Steve Scalise seriously wounded.

As Caesar was, as he returned to Italy, the president and his family being constantly threatened with lawsuits, both private and public, and have been subjected to other ruinous fantasies and all in the name of a higher loyalty. Beleaguered from the start in his own White House, it's taken Trump the better part of his first term to wrap his arms around the magnitude of the task the American people assigned to him four years ago, draining, draining the swamp.

Obama holdover holdovers about outright saboteurs such as James Comey weren't cashiered quickly enough and so forth. And then he goes on. As we've seen throughout the past four years, appeasement doesn't work no matter what the duly elected president, the duly elected president, the United States did, that was not satisfying, no satisfying the rabid left and its media. Short of Trump's expulsion from office. And so they managed one of the strongest counter campaigns in U.S. political history, rigging their nomination process to spit forth a superannuated, long, life long political hack rushing headlong into his embarrassing dotage.

And it's stalling as his vice president, the dangerous woman, they really wanted to head their ticket, but who couldn't garner any support during the primaries. It's a breathtakingly cynical ploy and a stain on American political history should it succeed.

So please, Mr. President, he writes, Fight all the way to the end until these cases get to court, the big one located right behind the Capitol, and your arguments can be heard over the talking heads and the chattering classes. Go on national TV, explain to the American people what the stakes really are. It's not your political survival, but the survival of the republic itself under a constitutional left increasingly openly despises. Michael Walsh, is that the pipeline dog, author of The Devil's Pleasure Palace and The Fiery Angel.

His latest book, Last Stands. We'll be published in December. Also a good friend. He's a brilliant man. Now, before I take a break, I can't do this justice, but I heard the tail end of my friend Larry O'Connor Show and W.M. in Washington and he was talking about this Pennsylvania 2020 voting analysis report that came out on November 16th. Other people that sent it to me, I hadn't had time to look at it, but now I have given.

Thankfully, the Larry started to talk about it. I want to read you this executive summary. From this document. And these people are experts. Now, if I were to post this on Facebook right now, they would admonish me and probably punish me, wouldn't they, Mr. Producer? This scientific analysis of the reported Pennsylvania 2020 presidential voting results is a nonpartisan effort by unpaid citizens and volunteer experts. Our only objective is to play a small role in helping assure that all legal Pennsylvania votes are counted and that only legal Pennsylvania votes are counted.

Whether Donald Trump or Joseph Biden wins is not of concern in this analysis. The scientists involved with the report just want the election results to truly reflect the wishes of Pennsylvania voting citizens. Since there are multiple reports of voting chicanery circulating the Internet, remember, this was on the 6th, a collection of statisticians and other scientists volunteered to examine the reported Pennsylvania results. From a scientific statistical perspective, we say the best way to do this is to start by putting ourselves in the shoes of bad actors and then considering how they might go about changing the wishes of Pennsylvania citizens into a different result.

Some of the actions they may take, our number one, keep ineligible people deceased, moved, etc. on the voting rolls. This would disguise actual voter participation rates, allow fabricated votes to be submitted in their names, etc., no to get legislation passed that did not require in-person voter identification. This would make it easier for non-citizens, felons, etc. to vote. Number three, encourage a much higher percentage of voting by mail. This would make it much easier to manipulate as in-person checking is a more secure way to keep track of actual registered voters.

Number four, discard envelopes and other identifying materials from mail and votes. This makes it very hard to check for duplications. Number five count million votes without careful signature or registration verification. This makes mailing an easier choice for manipulators. Number six allow votes to count that are received after Election Day. This can direct where mail and votes are needed to go. Number seven, stop vote counting for several hours before the final tabulations. This allows genuine excuse me, this allows for an assessment of how many votes are needed, etc.

. Number eight do not allow genuine oversight of voting tabulation. This would make it easier to lose or miscalculate actual votes. Number nine, canek voting machines or precincts to the Internet. This makes it quite easy for third parties to access and change votes. Number 10 distribute manipulations over multiple counties. This makes the adjustments more difficult to find. Number 11, it is multiple tactics to make manipulations. This also makes the changes more difficult to find a number to make most of the manipulations in unexpected districts.

In other words, don't do as much manipulation, whereas expected. There are undoubtedly more strategies, those who are trying to control our politics would employ, but this is a representative sample. Should also be made clear many of these are difficult to find. Frequently, there's documented proof of some of those voting actions, like leaving non eligible voters on the rolls, but these are usually dismissed with cursory responses such as we're doing the best we can or those deviations.

Are not statistics statistically significant or our roles are as accurate as other states or there are some benefits for doing this and on and on. But studies like this and reports like this and they cite them do not instill confidence that election results actually reflect the wishes of actual citizens. So what can we do as scientists, clearly, we can't verify the legitimacy of every Pennsylvania voter submitted. On the other hand, we can from a scientific perspective and with sufficient data, provide a statistic, statistically strong assessment that reported votes in certain locations are statistically unusual.

Such a determination should be treated as an indication that some type of accident or purposeful manipulation almost certainly occurred and they go on. Then they point to some of these counties and they have chart after chart after chart. And. I'm trying to find because I couldn't print it out. Here, for example, they take a look at Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, the county I come from. They look at 2008. Obama got two hundred and fifty three thousand votes 2012, Obama got two hundred thirty three thousand votes.

They look at 2016, Clinton got 256 thousand votes already reduced. They look at 2020, Biden got 300, 13000 votes. Does anybody really believe that? They look at Allegheny County, big Democrat County, Obama in 08 got three hundred seventy three thousand votes. Obama in 2012 got three hundred and fifty two thousand votes. Clinton in 2016 got thirty six thousand votes. Excuse me, 367 thousand votes. And Biden got four hundred and fifteen thousand votes.

Anybody believe that? Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Obama in 08 got one hundred and seventy eight thousand votes in 012, he got one hundred and seventy one thousand votes. Hillary got one hundred and seventy seven thousand votes, Biden got 200000 votes in these big counties Montgomery, Allegheny, Chester Bucks, Delaware. Biden significantly outdid Clinton and Obama twice now, you might say, well, the populations have increased actually in many of these areas, the population has actually decreased.

Decreased. Excuse me. And I can go on. And they say this is a big deal. And it is a big deal. Now, normally, you could attach this to a filing in federal court or even state court. And it would be enough to get pass a motion to dismiss, but the judges. They don't want to they don't want to go through. They don't want to do it. And so they're requiring significantly more information. Or they're making excuses is what they're really doing.

I hear people talk on radio and TV who've really never litigated or have only litigated a handful of matters. I can tell you somebody who was president of the Legal Foundation, I don't think we ever had a case dismissed. I don't think we ever had a case dismissed. Unexplained significant deviations from expected results like mathematical inconsistencies supported by experts should be more than sufficient to establish a reasonable basis to file a complaint and justify fast discovery unless you're a federal judge and you don't want to be involved in this.

I'll be right back. My love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them, a man who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead a c us.

News busters, I'm not going to have time to get in on a fantastic piece where they talk about how the media was involved in stealing the election and you can hear these fruitcakes, morons.

And I better watch my language. You can hear how they talk. About Biden, but they used to say about Trump, the same people, they used to throw verbal Molotov cocktails at the president, the United States. Now they're throwing kisses at. But it's sickening. Absolutely sickening. Let's see here the great Paul Bedard at The Washington Examiner, 66 percent of the Republicans want Donald Trump to run again in 2024, 79 percent, that's eight out of 10 say the election was stolen.

And I stick with the 80 percent. And the 66 percent, it is hilarious now. A lot of these Republicans who wanted to run for president in twenty twenty four, now they have to wait, don't they, Mr. Producer, for Donald to decide? Yes, they do. The other thing is that. 73 percent of respondents said they'd heard about the allegations involving Biden in China and all the rest of it, 27 percent said they not, including 36 percent of Biden voters.

Those Biden voters were then asked, if you've been aware this actual event and evidence and emails and so forth. Would you have voted for him? The voters were then given several options. Several options. Let's see, five point six percent said they would have voted of the Democrats who voted excuse me, those who voted for Biden for a third party not voted for him, four point seven percent not voted at all.

One point seven percent, over 10 percent of them would not have voted for Joe Biden. Here's your media. They write back. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

This is Radio Free America on the Mark Levin Show, Konoe, eight seven seven three eight one 38 11.

Cheryl Atkinson really has blown the whistle on the media, probably the first one to blow the whistle on the media. Remember, she used to be a reporter at CBS. She's written a fantastic book. It's really prescient. It's really timely, slanted out of the news media, taught us to love censorship and hate journalism. Cheryl, how are you? I'm great.

I'm so excited to be on your program. Thank you, Mark.

Well, it is a great honor. So let me give you the floor. Tell everybody what motivated you to write this book when you decided to write this book and give us a feel for what's in the book?

I think I consider this now the third in a trilogy of two books I wrote before this, the first around 2014, when I left CBS News ahead of my contract as I observed what changes had happened in the industry of news and how it was growing. More difficult, not just at CBS, but complaints from a lot of people I know and colleagues at national news organizations. It was harder all the way around to report fair and unfettered news because there were special interests, political and corporate, trying to make sure they steer the narrative a certain way.

And they were very successful, in my view, the first two decades of this century in getting their nose under the tent of news organizations to define the terms of how we cover stories, what we talk about, what we don't talk about, what views are considered acceptable and ones that shouldn't be heard, which was new to me after decades of journalism, that we just censor things entirely.

And then I talked about in the second book, the whole industry. I called it the smear. This multibillion dollar group of PR firms, crisis management firms, political action committees, non-profits, global law firms that together comprise an industry that sells this influence over the news media and sells ways for companies and political interests to control news and information. Then, in my view, 2016 comes along and the people that want to control narratives for their own reasons, usually it traces back to financial.

They saw that they had a pretty good trip on pretty good hold on the news landscape, the information landscape, but not on the Internet. And they saw people were able to go to the Internet and get largely unfettered access to information, whether it's viewpoints they don't want you to hear or have or whether it's peer reviewed, published scientific studies that they don't want you to see. So they set about in 2016 to try to change that, too. And I talk about that in Slanted.

It's sort of an extension of controlling the news, this effort to control social media, Google searches what you can and can't see. And I will say that I think it's actually quite clever because before they these unseen third parties, usually with conflicted interests reasons, they want us to see things and not see certain things they knew in 2016, they couldn't suddenly step in and just start censoring things overtly because the public wouldn't stand for it. So they created a market for it.

They had to make us think this is something that would be useful for us. They had to create a demand for it. And you can look at David Brock from the propaganda group Media Matters, who brags about actually to his donors saying that he's the one that convinced Facebook to embark on the first, what I call fake fact checks, pressured Facebook into doing this. And we went on from there by saying that there was fake news. It could hurt us by saying that other people needed to act as intermediaries.

They wormed their way into our information landscape. And now there are a lot of people who say, yes, I want someone to curate my information. I like it when these people come in and tell me what my tender shouldn't see. And I think that's a very dangerous place.

It is a very dangerous place. And it is always from one perspective. I mean, you don't see liberal commentators being being dunked or dinged, I should say, by by Facebook or by Twitter. You didn't see Joe Biden. You don't see you don't see members of Congress on the left.

And these so-called third parties in a Reuters and PolitiFact and. They're actually quite liberal and in the age of Trump. The news media and these social sites and so forth, it's actually gotten a hell of a lot worse, hasn't it? Absolutely, I mean, one thing Trump accomplished, whether he meant to or not, was there was growing bias among the media, not just for political interest, but for corporate reasons and money reasons.

But we were maintaining the appearance of a firewall between news and opinion, and we were pretending that the influence wasn't there. And Trump, somehow, by being the outsider and having these unconventional ways, made the media lose their mind and admit exactly what we are and what we were out for. In fact, The New York Times announced and other news organizations with the advent of Trump that they were suspending their longstanding normal ethics and practices because they said these standards didn't fit.

They needed to not abide by the standards that they had abided by because this is a uniquely dangerous precedent. And I, of course, argue quite rationally, I think that your standards and practices are on a sliding scale. They exist so that when you cover somebody, you may have personal feelings about that. You you still follow neutral practices and treat everybody the same. They're not supposed to be lifted just because one day you decided you really, really don't like somebody you're covering.

And this encompasses The New York Times deciding to use the word lie and talk about that a lot in the book, slanted the verbiage of the narrative. When The New York Times began calling Trump a liar and their headlines, it was cheered on not just by other journalists and non-profit news organizations and watchdogs who should have been frowning upon it. But it was cheered on by journalism professors, one of whom I quote in my book, who talks about in an op ed that neutrality and objectivity in journalism are overrated.

Who is it? I can't remember.

Jay Rosen, my head. I think it is. Yeah, that guy is. But you know, Mark saying that saying that objectivity and journalism in journalism should be dead is to me like a doctor telling you diet and exercise don't matter. These are fundamental. These aren't things that should be optional. But that's how they're viewed today in some journalism schools and by supposed journalism professionals.

The book is slanted by really a heroine here, Cheryl Atkinson, and it's how they meet news media excuse me, taught us to love censorship and hate journalism. It's up on all my sites. Ladies and gentlemen, parler Twitter, Facebook for now. Mark Levin Show Parler. Mark Levin Twitter. Mark Levin Show Facebook. You can go directly to Amazon. It's a fantastic book. I want to play something for you. This is I think it's Yamaichi Alcindor on MSNBC today.

Mr. Producer, cotinine go sort of thing on say, as I was talking to a Democrat who just said this also felt like The Avengers, it felt like we're being rescued from this craziness that we've all lived through from the last four years and now you're the superheroes to come and save us all.

Now let's play Martha Raddatz on ABC News cuts seven.

Mr. Producer, this is about the least flashy team you could possibly get. They are deeply experienced. They are humble, and they are lifelong public servants. When I look at that group up there and let's put John Kerry aside, because as we know, he was the Democratic nominee for president once. But they are not political. They are just career people. They have worked together for many years. I remember Jake Sullivan at the at the side of Hillary Clinton when she was secretary of state all the time.

And as they say, they really do reflect America.

You know, Cheryl Atkinson. Do these sound like reporters to you seriously? Well, this is something that even those same reporters, I think these are things they wouldn't have said five or six years ago. But as they've seen reporters follow suit and this industry has changed with The New York Times leading the way, it's sort of like they've gotten the green light and there's no repercussions for it. They get cheered on by their colleagues and their bosses when they do it.

So I guess we just get more of the same.

There's no self policing, not. And that's great, because if you really want to look at it in a deep dive, the nonprofits that are supposed to watch over us, the news organizations, the Columbia Journalism Review, these are now funded by and influenced by the same interests that are controlling the news narratives and the social media narratives. These are these all traced back to the same people. It's part and parcel of the same effort. And really should be no surprise when you look at who's pulling strings behind the scene.

You know, you've committed your entire career to journalism. It must really frustrate you.

And I think this is why you write these books, to say, hey, America, look at this, to see what's gone on, because the professionalism I mean, for so many of these people, it's just not a profession. It is an opportunity to advance a cause.

No, absolutely. If you understand now, as I think you do, that much of the news at places that were formerly top, well respected organizations, CNN, Washington Post, by the way, I worked at CNN when it was a news organization, The New York Times. They're no longer their goal isn't to reflect the facts on the ground and bring truth to light. And you can see this at The New York Times staff meeting transcript that was leaked that I talk about in my book.

The goal now is to advance a narrative for a particular cause and has nothing to do with putting forth both sides of an issue or revealing what's going on. They set out in advance what they want to tell, what they want you to think, regardless of what they actually find out. And I liken it when I was at CBS, and I certainly was far from the only person who noticed this or complained about it. There are certain managers who write little movies or films in their head at the beginning of the day because they have an ideological belief or something they think or something they want you to think.

And they tell you at the beginning of the day what the story must say, the kind of person you're supposed to interview. They'll say find a character who will say X and they sometimes even give the sentence. They want that person to say. And if you come back and say, I was at the story and I was on the ground, and that's not what happened, here's what really happened. And if you stick by that, they don't want the story.

They won't tell you that's why. But that story is not going to air if you don't change it to fit or to suit what it is that particular editorial person wants you to say.

Now, folks, if you want to understand what's going on, not just surface level, you see it and you hear it, but really want to understand from somebody who was there and is there. This is the book, Cheryl Atkinsons book. It's brand new. It comes out it came out today, slanted how the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism.

I would encourage you right now to go to Amazon.

Go ahead and order. They'll deliver it to you tomorrow. Or if you're on my social sites and you happen to be commenting on Facebook or Twitter or parler, by all means, it's posted there.

You can just jump on. It's very easy to order and so forth.

What is the I don't even know if this is a fair question.

What is the most shocking thing that you see going on in the in the press these days, or is it just it's overload and maybe there's not one thing?

Well, it's all related to the general notion that no longer is there even a pretense of neutrality or treating people the same. It would be one thing if they threw softball questions at both sides and mixed it up. Maybe you could criticize that, but at least they'd be trading at the same or one thing if all they did was ask really, really tough, a ridiculous and hostile questions. But the double standard is so obvious that tens of millions of people sit home and either don't want to watch the news or watch it and say we're not fools.

We see exactly what's going on, but we're made to believe if you live inside what I call the box, the Internet, the goal of those controlling that information is to make you think try to make you believe you're an outlier. You're the only one or very small group of you who thinks like this. And you shouldn't have those opinions and those thoughts because, look, everybody else thinks why when you're thinking X, so you better get on board and think, why two.

But I think what we saw with this election, whether you support Donald Trump or not, politically, I think there's hope in the notion that despite the negative and the saturation of our information landscape with one sided information, tens of millions of people voted for the guy that they weren't supposed to vote for, which means tens of millions of Americans are at least somewhat immune to the narrative and thus control that these forces are trying to wield over us.

I'm just reading here you have a third degree black belt. Is that true? It's fifth degree now, Mark.

Fifth degree. Yeah, I got my master's, in fact, not far from where I know you are. Oh, really? I train and yeah, I finally got my master's level. I know Chuck Norris, but yeah, I stay in shape and I could probably, you know. Yeah.

Hurt me.

I know what they say, but that's a I call off your head. I have five weapons.

I don't work out but I got plenty of ammo anyway.

Cheryl, this is a fantastic book. I want to encourage people right now to go to Amazon.com, slanted how the news media taught us to love censorship and hate journalism. And maybe we can knock Obama off the top of the list. And I wish you all the best and God bless you.

Well, it means a lot that you have me on to talk about it. I appreciate it, Martin. It's our honor. God bless you. And she's terrific. Really terrific. I hope you'll acquire that book and read it over the holiday.

All right. I'll tell you what. Here's what we're going to we're going to reconvene and come back and take care of business. I'll be right back.

My in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. EMAC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more.

And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c U.S..

A couple of messages here before I say goodbye. I'll be back Monday, by the way. We'll have our wonderful friend Brian Moran tomorrow. Thursday is a killer best stuff. And then our buddy, Mr. Call screener, Rich Valdez, does a terrific job.

He's a good man. Don't forget Charlie Atkinson's great book, Slanted. Don't forget our friend Pete Hegseth. Great book as well on the mission.

And and I think you're going to really enjoy both of them. And they're both very, very important. And I want to talk to you in the minute or two. We have left before I leave the show, and it's this. Try and enjoy your Thanksgiving. Those of us who are going to be with family, those of you who aren't. And thank God for this, in my view. Thank God that there's 74 million of us who have some common sense that there's 74 million of us Anami Army who believe in this country and liberty, that there are 74 million of us who know who know that this election was bogus.

And I say that not as a conspiracy, not not as a right winger, not as anything of the sort. We have a lot more information than they ever had, whether Russia collusion B.S. and they want to shut this down as fast as they can ignore the usual Republicans. They're irrelevant. They've always been irrelevant. Everything's at stake. Everything's at stake. But take solace in knowing that we are red blooded Americans.

And as I say, there's 74 million of us who stand strong and we're not going anywhere. We salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters and emergency personnel. And I want to thank you. I am blessed because you're here and we will stand together no matter what, OK? God bless each and every one of you and have a magnificent Thanksgiving. I'll see you on Monday. From the Westwood One podcast network.