Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. In our numbers, eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one 877 three eight one three eight one one. Obviously, the surgery went well.

It's a boy, Mr. Producer.

No, no, I'm just kidding. I have a very bad deviated septum, I've had it for decades and decades. And I was having trouble breathing and you can still hear I still have these things in my nose for the recovery, but nonetheless. My wife, my family was getting on me. And so I finally jumped in, you know, I set up the surgery many weeks ago. So that's what it was about. That's all about heart surgery, nothing of that sort.

But I want to thank you all. I want to jump in on this. I'll do the best I can. To address this in a way that I think is pertinent and appropriate. OK, Joe Biden is giving a talk right now.

Reading off a teleprompter, which is fine. Because we've now exceeded 500000 deaths from the coronavirus. I want to put a little footnote on that, I don't know that it's 500000, 400000, 570000 or 300, 12000, and really nobody else does either, because our government, the CDC and others.

Have been very ambiguous, at least early on, about how to. How to count? And then it's the import hospitals and others to put the information in. But let's say it's 500000. What's interesting to me is we don't see these charts and graphs on TV anymore, and I've talked about this, about 15 percent of those who've died have died since Joe Biden was president of the United States.

Now, why do I bring that up to assign blame? No, but he did he did that to the prior administration. He politicized this and exploited it as much as he possibly could right into the Oval Office.

I'm bringing that up because a pandemic is a pandemic and it doesn't know partying, it doesn't know politics, it doesn't know ideology. And so was appalling. What the media and the Democrat Party and Joe Biden tried to do. Prior to him being sworn in as president of the United States and I noticed nobody does that they him. And there's an excellent piece by an excellent writer, Matt Margolis, at PJ Media I want to get to in a minute, but before I do.

That number of 500000. I heard the media say this earlier today and I heard Joe Biden just say it, that's more dead than a World War One, World War two and the Vietnam War combined. Over 30 million babies have been aborted in this country, well over 30 million. That's genocide, the likes of which the world has never seen. And I don't care what the liberals say or some Supreme Court lawyers have to say or anybody else has to say, those are human beings.

They're not reptile's. They're not foul. Those are human beings. Those are babies. And people can deceive themselves into believing there's something else, but they're not. Follow the science. Those are human beings. And so I just have to say, Joe Biden was almost. Religious in his lectures early on about coping, and we have to fight things together, and I get it. But I don't see the moral distinction. When you're talking about human life.

And when you're talking about tens of millions of human beings. Who aborted? The overwhelming, vast majority of whom would have been born healthy. And yet our Supreme Court. Our Congress and this president. Governors throughout this country and state legislatures throughout this country. Not only accommodate it, they insist that we all pay for. I'm willing to have this moral discussion with a Joe Biden or a Nancy Pelosi, both of whom are Catholic, or Chuck Schumer who is Jewish, I'd be more than happy to have this discussion about morality and life and death more than happy.

A pandemic is one thing. A virus unleashed into this country as a result of what the communist Chinese did. That's one thing, and we fight it as best we can. But abortion is a completely different issue. That's not a viral pandemic. And this president. Is an active supporter of a radical policy that would require all of us to pay for these abortions, whether we morally object or not.

There's no vaccines for abortions. Our prior president, Donald Trump. Opposed abortion. He came to this. Not out of politics. Not out of positioning himself, he came on. Because of his belief system evolved over time. In fact, you could say he was the number one anti-abortion or pro-life president we've had, and that's true. And he fought the pandemic to tooth and nail. The reason we have a vaccine to distribute at all is because of what occurred in his administration.

And there's an interesting. That even in the current administration bind, they don't talk about warp speed with a third vaccine or a fourth vaccine, if it happens, it happens. If it doesn't, it doesn't. That's quite a different attitude that the Biden administration has now. The Trump administration had, isn't it? Very different attitude. We don't get daily or even weekly press conferences telling us. We're pushing hard the next vaccine operation, this, we're working with this, we're working with that Johnson and Johnson may have won, some of the others may have won and so forth.

Fine. But they just leave it to the bureaucrats in these various departments, the so-called scientists and medical experts, the fortune and fortune types with these different responsibilities, and if they come up with one and work with the private sector, great. If they don't, they don't.

We haven't heard a single thing that is the equivalent of operation warp speed. We could use another vaccine or two. And then you see the Associated Press. The biggest propaganda operation on the face of the earth because of its reach, a wire service. And you wake up this morning and they're celebrating Joe Biden, he's going to hit 100 million vaccines in 100 days, they may even do more. But nothing's been changed. The assembly lines are making the vaccines that we're making them when Donald Trump was president until he left office or the same assembly lines.

And then you build efficiencies, you can expand. You learn other techniques. To move it from point A to point B to preserve the vaccines under very cold temperatures and so forth, this is the natural course of things. A Biden administration hasn't done anything special, hasn't done anything unique, it hasn't done anything. It seems to me under any kind of pressure timeline. And it's been all over the map on this issue. And so I'm more than happy to have the moral discussion about this, I'm more than happy to talk about numbers and all the rest of it.

These are human beings. And the other thing I notice. Is that this White House has been utterly and completely silent. When it comes to some of the behavior by some of the governors, politicians in resulting in some of these deaths. Biden is yet to say a word about Andrew Cuomo. Look at his cover. Now there's a criminal investigation, nothing he has said nothing about six Democrat governors in six of the biggest states. That insisted and forced individuals with covid positive results in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, nothing, not a word.

And when we come back, I want to tell you. But so far, the best I can tell what Joe Biden has done. His attack, his predecessor. If they done something terrifically new about production, about new vaccines, about new distribution, how come there's nothing in front of us, nothing tangible to read or feel or talk about?

There's nothing. I'll be right back. My love in. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair. So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today at Leavin for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Not Margolis, PJ Media. More proof Biden's attacks on Trump's vaccine distribution plan are based on lies.

Earlier this week, Joe Biden falsely claimed the President Trump failed to order enough quote unquote.

covid-19 vaccines was the latest in a series of attacks from the Biden administration criticizing the vaccine distribution plan or lack of one left by the Trump administration.

It's amazing to me. Two vaccines developed. In eight months. Really seven months, you know, we've never done that before. The average time for a vaccine is over five years. It just amazes me that the president, Donald Trump, is criticized as if he didn't care, he didn't do anything. He knew in the end that Falchi was wrong.

He knew in the end that wearing masks or paper hats or sneakers or or hiding under the table for the rest of your life wasn't going to fix or resolve anything, was going to make matters worse.

So he took the whip to the bureaucracy, which is one of the reasons for pushing the other. Didn't like him.

And he insisted and demanded that they work like never before. Not that they cut health corners, but they cut bureaucratic corners, that they get off their asses and work overtime to get things done. No. Nine to five.

And that they work with the private sector. The best companies in the world, and that's exactly what was achieved, and then these two companies announced days after the election that they have vaccines.

Now, you know, in the bureaucracy knew we had vaccines, you know, these companies knew we had vaccines, but they waited. They waited. And then you had Joe Biden throughout the summer and Kamala Harris downplaying the idea of a vaccine. I interviewed the president. That's President Trump in September. I said, what do you make of all these attacks and so forth? Says because they know we're going to have them and they don't want to you know, they don't want it to negatively affect their electoral chances.

And that's exactly what happened. They exploited it. And they're still trying to make you believe that, but for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and some invisible new bureaucrats and staff. But for them, we wouldn't be on the glide path we're on now, it's a lie. Kamala Harris said there was no national strategy or plan for vaccines, we were leaving it to the states and local leaders to try and figure it out in so many ways, we're starting from scratch on something that's been raging for almost an entire year.

That's what she said in an interview with a left wing site, Axios, the other week. Even Falchi had to dismiss the claim. He said, We're certainly not starting from scratch. We're coming in with fresh ideas, but also some ideas that were not bad ideas with the previous administration you can't say was absolutely not usable at all. It's taking what's going on, but amplifying it in a big way, he added. And I don't know even know why we care what felt, he says, since he wasn't even in charge of the project, quite frankly.

But the Biden administration is still using the same vaccine distribution models developed by Operation Warp Speed under President Trump. I want to repeat this so even the AP, MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post and all the other liars and frauds. Understand what I'm saying? The Biden administration is still using the same vaccine distribution model developed by Operation Warp Speed under President Trump. Because Trump had the professionals handle this. The military, HHS, the scientists.

It's more or less the plan that we put together, frankly, that's happening and maybe there are improvements and that's really great some acceleration. But clearly we didn't go from no plan to a plan and from no vaccine to a vaccine. Dr. Munsif Sulloway, the former head of the Operation Wharfs Beat, told Fox News last week. He also said he was surprised the Biden administration is gloating about a vaccine distribution plan that isn't their own. Biden always the plagiarist, huh?

The data also proves that attacks from the Biden administration are unfounded. According to a graph generated by newsie vaccine production and distribution under Biden has not accelerated, but rather follow the same trajectory as it was under Trump followed the same trajectory that it was under Trump, as I just explained, whether you're building computers or iPhones or cars or whatever. Once the assembly lines in place, once the knowledge is in place, the production begins to pick up, pick up, pick up and then you have cost savings on top of everything.

Joe Biden's Department of Defense also doesn't dispute that the distribution plan is the same as it was under Trump. In fact, General Gus Perna, who led the effort under Trump, is still there in the same exact capacity. Centralized distribution is being managed by the CDC through an existing contract to deliver vaccines and supply kits. We continue the mission to accelerate the development, manufacturing and delivery of safe and effective vaccines and therapies. And General Pernick continues in his role overseeing this effort, Pernice spokeswoman Laura Oko told Newsie.

So Joe Biden has said he wants to unify the country rather than give President Trump the credit he deserves, is actually trying to take credit for the vaccine and a distribution plan. He has absolutely nothing to do with. Matt Margolis. PJ Media, you got that Washington Post, The New York Times, you got that CNN and MSNBC, you got that all the rest of the crap media, all you have to do is dig into it.

You'll find the same information again. This is why we don't get press conferences from Biden or others telling us all the new fandangos kind of activities they're involved in. They aren't. I'll be right back. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair. So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration.

Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain. We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered.

Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today at Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom. In for Hillsdale Dotcom.

The liberals and the Republicans don't like him, but America does. You can call my Klavan at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Do my best here. Drip, drip, drip. I want to talk to you about a subject that I spent really much of my life studying, and that's the Supreme Court of the United States. The first book I wrote was called Men in Black. And in that book, you'll notice that the foreword was written by Rush Limbaugh. And that book came out in 2005.

It was the number one selling book on the Supreme Court, other than the Brethren, which was gossipy book about what clerks have been telling this particular reporter about the justices and so forth.

That was not my book. I said at the time, you know, when people rely on the court, they're relying on people. The many ways are highly political and highly partisan. Some of them are able to control themselves and they have a philosophical approach to interpreting the Constitution that comports with their obligation to uphold it and defend it, but most are not.

And you can see much of that in the history of the court. There are three justices today. Who comported themselves with great honor. Who have respect for the rule of law and respect for you, just three out of this out of the nine. In those three. The great Clarence Thomas, thank God for Clarence Thomas, the great Sam Alito, who has been absolutely exceptional.

And Neil Gorsuch, who's either really, really good or not. But not Kavanagh and not Koni. And what am I talking about here? This is how Reuters puts it. U.S. Supreme Court formally pulls the plug on election related cases. The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the election.

The justices turned away appeals by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and Republican members of the state legislature of a ruling by Pennsylvania's top court ordering officials to count mail in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received up to three days later.

They did more than that. They eliminated the signature requirement and other requirements. Three of the nine members on the court, six conservative justices. Well, that is a lie. And they'll continue to do that in the media because it serves their narrative. Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Al Gore such dissented from the decision not to hear the Pennsylvania case.

The high court, as expected, also rejected two Trump appeals challenging Biden's victories in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, based on claims that the rules for mail in ballots in the two election battleground states were invalid. The court also turned away separate cases brought by Trump allies in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, all states won by Biden.

And then they say Trump made false claims and so forth. Well, how do they know Trump made false claims? The court won't hear it, this court won't hear him either. Why do the media report this way? Anyway, on the Pennsylvania case. On the Pennsylvania case. Happen to be familiar with both of them. The one to me that was the strongest of the cases was the one that was a straight up challenge under Article two, Section one, clause two of the Constitution.

Which is very simple. That is that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the attorney general of Pennsylvania and the secretary of state of Pennsylvania, have absolutely no authority to substantively change election laws in the state yet. That's precisely what they did. Now, that's not the way it's explained by Reuters or AP or any other news organizations. But that's exactly what they did. Now, you have three justices who wanted to hear that case, six who did not.

So what happens next cycle, which is exactly the point of the dissent. We're going to be right back here again because this wasn't resolved, and I can guarantee you that the leader of this of this sort of rogue effort. Is the chief justice of the United States, John Roberts. But the fact that Kony and Kavanagh joined with Roberts and the leftists on the court, appalling. What is the use of the Supreme Court, it gets involved in every damn thing imaginable, every cultural issue has to be run by the Supreme Court, whether it's abortion or prayer, whether it's nativity scenes.

Whether it's marriage, every single cultural issue is run by the Supreme Court, why all they are lawyers? Why do they control what happens in every state, in every town and in every public square? But here we have something that occurred under the federal constitution where the framers could not have been clear, the state legislators, even John Roberts, should be able to read that. But six of them, including Cabinet and Cownie, they great cabinet on the great Koni.

Decided. Not to get involved. Shame on them. They have helped. To pour fuel on the fire of the division in this country by failing to uphold the United States Constitution and drawing a line that's their damn job, not to interfere in all these other matters. Now, the second Pennsylvania case. Which is straightforward, black and white, simple as can be. The Pennsylvania state legislature, Republican. And the Democrat governor. Conspired to violate their own constitution.

Now, you might say what's set have to do with the federal government, nothing, except it involves the selection of electors who choose the president and vice president of the United States. So it has everything to do with the federal constitution. It's not a federalism issue. In other words, state legislatures are free to conduct themselves as they wish within the civil rights requirements and so forth. But they're not free to violate their own constitution. In order to create a situation where you have tainted electors being counted in Washington, D.C. on the day those electors are counted.

So they disenfranchise the people in Pennsylvania. By not actually amending the Constitution, by effectively passing a statue in lieu of an amendment that allowed for mail in voting, and they felt pressure to do it because of the pandemic. We're destroying our country based on this pandemic. You understand the left is running right through it. That was a simple up and down case. And the state Supreme Court of Pennsylvania with a variety of outrageous tricks, wouldn't even hear it.

The appellate court in Pennsylvania, this appellate judge, she was fantastic and courageous. She said, yes, I'm going to hear this case. Because the plaintiffs in this case make a very serious argument that our state constitution was violated and that it taints and has an effect on the federal constitutional process. She was shut down in 72 hours by a partisan elected state supreme court shut down and then they shut down the petitioners. They made it impossible for the petitioners to even have their day in the state Supreme Court, and now they don't get their day in the federal Supreme Court.

So there's your court system, ladies and gentlemen. What a crock. What a joke. Good job, John Roberts. Those were the two most important cases. Because they specifically addressed the federal constitutional system, which was violated in Pennsylvania, which was violated in Wisconsin, which was violated in Georgia, which was violated in Michigan and frankly was violated in Arizona. And so now what? And so now guess what, ladies and gentlemen, the Democrats are going to feel that they can do whatever the hell they want in these states and they're going to go back into these states.

And they're going to push an agenda even further to make it absolutely impossible to win the state's. In other words, your United States Supreme Court. Rewrote the federal Constitution of the United States by not acting. Because it allowed these rogue actors, all Democrats, except in the one instance in Pennsylvania with the Republican legislature, allowed them to change the language effectively, practically in terms of implementation under the federal constitution.

Your federal constitution was changed in the last election. I don't give a damn what The New York Times, The Washington Post opinion this, this, that I don't care what any of them say, I'm not even addressing fraud. I'm addressing a crooked system, systematic violations of our constitutional system. And there they are, six of the nine justices sitting on their asses doing not a damn thing about it because they're afraid of what will be said about them in the editorial pages of The New York Times and The Washington Post.

Cowards, absolute cowards. There is a justice coni, there is a justice cavener, you have fought like hell for them and then they spit on you. But the justices did have the votes. Well, I should say the opposite. The justices took another pass today. They think it's OK for a local Democrat prosecutor to get the tax returns of a Republican president, whether he's in office or out of office.

Now, what kind of door does that open?

What kind of an idiot do you have to be to not understand the precedent that that creates any pretext for investigating a president now by some slob out of some city or town or county? Any pretext that they can. Pulled together to make it seem like a legitimate investigation. Will now be a basis for a president having to provide his tax returns. Just because Democrats in the media demand the tax returns of somebody, I open the Constitution, it's not in there.

There's no requirement. A matter of fact, let me suggest this to you. You know, when the Constitution was originally written and adopted, there was no damn income tax. There was no Internal Revenue Service. So now some jerk elected district attorney in Manhattan, Vance Jr., whose dad was an idiot to. A clown, a secretary of state who resigned under Carter, of all people. Now, he says that we shall continue on, continue on.

They tried the emoluments clause, they've tried everything they can against Trump. But now here's what I believe. I believe all the financial records of every Supreme Court justice should be revealed. That we need to have transparency, that branch of government is cloistered and hidden behind very thick marble walls, which, by the way, has chiseled above the door, Jesus and Moses, the Ten Commandments, you know, all the things we're not allowed to have. That's what they walk under every day in order to get to their office.

No hypocrisy there. So we need transparency. We need to know all about their financial relationships, family members, because, after all, they have the final word, quote unquote, on the Constitution. Just ask them, they'll tell you that. And we need Nancy Pelosi's tax records and her husband. Why just Donald Trump? Why just Donald Trump? I'll be right back. Much love in. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair.

So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through hills, free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today and living for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom. Livin for Hillsdale Dotcom.

What is the point of the Supreme Court? I don't even know. It's just appalling what this court has done and now now that it you know, people say, well, it hasn't ruled well, it ruled in a way now that clearly sides with the Democrat Party and their lawyers.

Clearly undermines the constitutional construct that was put together in Philadelphia and adopted by the conventions in the states, it says state legislatures, state legislatures.

And if the Supreme Court can't even discern that term in the Constitution, what the hell good is it? Tomorrow, men in black, how the Supreme Court is destroying America. Well, look at it. It's been wrong on so many immigration issues, so many regulatory issues, so many tax issues. It upheld the Great Society and the New Deal and all these other things. It has advanced a radical approach to gender. I mean, so here we have a straight constitutional question and it becomes controversial, why?

Because it might cost the Democrats well, why is that controversial? Do the right thing. You know, buyer Sotomayor. What's the other one, Cagen, those three? They marched together on these controversial issues and they never break ranks. They never break ranks. It's like the Democrats in Congress, they never break ranks. The Republicans are all over the place. So the way to look at this today is that basically. John Roberts, a disastrous chief justice, Michael Luttig should have been the chief justice.

Kavanagh, who you bled for and argued for and prayed for. Kone, who the president moved heaven and earth to make sure she get on the court, not for him, but to uphold the Constitution, all three of them. Let down the country today. All three of them. All three of them let down the country today. They're so worried about positioning themselves and positioning the court, that's why I said it's become a political entity. In so many ways.

But we're not getting justice in the Supreme Court, and that is a huge problem for a society when the court doesn't uphold the Constitution, even when it's black and white, even when you really have to do somersaults in order to come up with a different conclusion. The court is doing severe damage not just to its integrity, the integrity of the electoral system, but the integrity of the Constitution. A disgraceful day.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here he's here now broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Tommy Horowitz is an excellent independent journalist who really puts his neck on the line often and he went to Yale to ACLU students if they'll sign a petition to repeal the United States Constitution. And Amy does a terrific job. But unfortunately, I think you need to listen to this hat tip, Amy Horowitz, cut nine go Hamami Horowitz. And I'm here on the campus of Yale University, where the students are our future thought leaders. The U.S. Constitution is the guarantor of our rights and the foundation of our freedoms.

Or is it I have a mission to repeal the Constitution of the United States. What I'm calling for is to repeal the Constitution, to repeal the Constitution of the United States, just get rid of it in its entirety. The whole thing, the whole thing is an interesting proposition for your theory and support. I mean, yeah, I like it, but I love your efforts and I wish you good luck. It was created in a racist and white supremacist context.

You agree that it's kind of a racist document at this point.

And I feel like it's a it's a white supremacist document. Oh, yeah. Do you feel it disenfranchises black people? Yeah, I think I'm with you. I'm with you. Which this is this is it's a it's a really it's a white supremacist document. No, I definitely agree. Yeah. Yeah. Very much wrapped it in white supremacy and everything that he said. I agree.

Actually burn it down and then, you know, get the right to vote. Oh no, no, no. Do you feel the Constitution's any relevance to you at all? Put it like that. To answer that question, though, do you think contrition has any relevance to you and your life and anything in it? I mean, I think I don't know. I don't know. There's no freedom in the Constitution. Yes. This guy did not sign a petition saying thank you.

So I thank you.

65 percent of everyone I spoke with signed my petition to get rid of the Constitution of the United States of America. I very much.

I appreciate. I mean, I agree with you with the best left. Thanks a lot, I appreciate this woman who sitting around all day trying to get people to sign up to vote. She didn't get a single person considering what we just witnessed. I was thankful.

Shocking, is it not? There's a lot going on behind the scenes, most of you are unfamiliar with this because you're not sitting in classrooms and college campuses, you're not reading books by these these Marxist neo Marxist professors that are pushing these ideologies.

And yet your kids are and your grandkids are, and they're influenced by politicians are, they're influenced by it in the Democrat Party, the bureaucracy is now being populated with this ideology, whether we're talking about public schools, colleges and universities or the federal and state bureaucracies.

And they're pushing this agenda. I have headlines here that have put together over the last three days here. That, you know. It's just it's just it's alarming. Like this, for instance. Biden team colluded with Iran to foil Trump diplomacy Washington Times. Progressives press concealed China's mass murder members, a Buddhist group. See here, Biden announces end of Trump's America first agenda and G-7 speech. Biden, let's see here, when it comes to sports, his attack on women's sports.

Every one of these. Here's a Biden administration urges Passage of Equality Act to rewrite Civil Rights Act to conflate gender identity with sexual orientation. Everything that Biden is doing is embracing every one of these ultra radical elements that are on our college campuses and being pressed by these professors. Every one of them virtually. And any succeeding, I found a piece thanks to our friends at Instapundit. That goes back six and a half years. Brilliant, brilliant man who I've met once or twice in my life.

Honestly, I don't even know if he's still with us. I hope he is, but I'm not sure.

James Pearson, he was the executive director of the John M. Olin Foundation, which is now non-existent because Mr Allen, who was very wealthy. Saw that one wealthy man of the right. Put together these foundations, they were ultimately hijacked by the left. Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, all this money left the organizations, they were not leftists. But this was something very important, and I want to read this to you in part because in part it explains.

Why had Americans writing back in 20, 04, why had Americans become so pessimistic about their country?

During the 1970s, and, of course, that affects today, why are they been overcome by a sense of malaise? Jimmy Carter described it.

Well, there was, of course, the long ordeal of Vietnam, followed by Watergate, then a sluggish economy reasons enough for Americans to feel some sense of doubt and disappointment. But why was Ronald Reagan able to reverse these doubts when Jimmy Carter could not?

The answer to these questions is that while Americans in general were not down on their country, Jimmy Carter, along with the leaders of the Democrat Party and its main constituent groups, certainly was.

Carter could not overcome the malaise of the 70s because he and his fellow Democrats had played a large role in fostering it. From the time of John Kennedy's assassination in 1963 to Jimmy Carter's election in 1976, the Democrat Party was gradually taken over by a bizarre doctrine that might be called today, punitive liberalism.

Now, listen to this. According to this doctrine, America had been responsible for numerous crimes and misdeeds through its history for which it deserved punishment and chastisement. White Americans had enslaved blacks and committed genocide against Native Americans that oppressed women and tyrannize minority groups such as the Japanese who beat internment camps during World War Two. They had been harsh and unfeeling toward the poor by our greed, we had to the environment and we're consuming a disproportionate share of the world's wealth and resources.

We'd coddle dictators abroad and violated human rights out of our irrational fear of communism. Given this bill of indictment, the punitive liberals held that Americans had no right at all to feel pride in their country's history or optimism about its future. Those who express such pride were written off as ignorant patriots who could not face up to the sins of the past. Well, today they're called white supremacists, among other things, of course.

And those who looked ahead to a brighter future were dismissed as naive Pollyannas who did not understand that the brief American century was now over. The punitive liberals felt that the purpose of national policy was to punish the nation for its crimes rather than build a stronger America and a brighter future for all.

Did he not nail this in 2004? Here, the punitive liberals parted company from earlier liberal reformers like FDR, Kennedy and Johnson, who viewed reform as a means of bringing the promise of American life within reach of more of our people. The reformers believe deeply that the American experiment in self-government was inherently good and that the task of policy was to improve it. But in the troubled years following Kennedy's Kennedy's death, the reform tradition took on a failed brow and a punitive visage.

And you can see the furrowed brow, a Biden with the endless constipated look on his face and that he's embraced this. Hook, line and sinker, sinker, in many ways, Jimmy Carter is leading, appointee's with a perfect exemplars of punitive liberalism. Given their sour look, it's no wonder that their leadership generated a sense of malaise among the American people during the 70s, an impressive network of interest groups was developed. Listen to this. To promote and take advantage of this sense of historical guilt.

These included the various feminists and civil rights groups who pressed for affirmative action quotas, other policies to compensate women and minorities for mass mistreatment, the welfare rights organizations who claim that welfare and various poverty programs were entitlements or even better, reparations that were owed to the poor as compensation for similar mistreatment. The environmental groups who pressed for ever more stringent regulations on business and various human rights and disarmament groups who pressed the government to punish or disassociate the United States from allies who are said to violate human rights.

These groups took up influential roles in the Democratic Party and in Congress and ensconced themselves in university departments from which outposts they promoted and elaborated upon the finer points of punitive liberalism.

This is a fantastically prescient piece. 50 years later. Excuse me, not 50 years later. Sixteen years later. The punitive aspects of this doctrine were made especially plain in debates of the liberals favorite policies. If one asked whether it was really fair to impose employment quotas for women and minorities, one often heard the answer. White men impose quotas on us and now we're going to do the same to them. Was busing of school children really an effective means of improving educational opportunities for blacks?

A parallel answer was often given whites plus blacks to enforce segregation, and now they deserved to get a taste of their own medicine. Do we really strengthen our own security by undercutting allied governments in the name of human rights, particularly when they are replaced by openly hostile regimes, as in Iran and Nicaragua? Naturally, it was somewhat difficult to advance the tenets of punitive liberalism in the public arena, and especially tricky to do so in electoral contests contests. The broader public, after all, is unlikely to take kindly to the idea that it needs to be punished for the sins of past generations.

Let's see here, the punitive liberals thus chose instead to advance their causes and the regulatory bodies and in the federal courts, the latter being the perfect arena for leveling blame and exacting punishment. And they did so with considerable success. Well, of course, they've done the same in our universities and colleges, in the media now. Their success, however, was the undoing of the nation, the punitive liberals, because they sought to cultivate guilt in order to leverage policy, proved incapable of adopting practical means to strengthen the economy or to advance American power in the world.

Such goals, in any case, would have been contradictory to their deeper longings, which were to dispel American pride and to shrink American ambitions at home and abroad.

The Cold War, in particular, seemed to them a pointless struggle between two flawed empires, two scorpions in a bottle. Well, they didn't wish to see the Communists wins. Neither were they prepared to swallow the triumphalism that would accompany a victory by the West. A strong economy, meanwhile, would disproportionately reward the rich and soft, contented middle classes. The very groups that the punitive liberals wished to chastise Nasser was perhaps inevitable that the policies of the punitive the liberals would give us the worst of all worlds weakness and embarrassment abroad, inflation and unemployment at home, and a public that was beginning to lose hope in its future.

By 1980, the nation had seen the results of his experiments with punitive liberalism and was beginning to look for an alternative, and they found one. His name was Ronald Reagan. And I got to thinking, not only is this right on. But this is why they had to get rid of Krumm. They had to try and destroy Trump. One of Ronald Reagan campaign slogans was. Make America great again, remember Mr.. Except that was called in the second term, making America great again, I believe.

Donald Trump. In many ways, substantively and otherwise saw America as Ronald Reagan did, now the never Trump will never understand this because they're blinded by their conceit in their hate.

So they're irrelevant. The liberal media has never embraced this anyway, so they're irrelevant. But I'm talking to you. Donald Trump. Make America great again, America first policy, American citizens, not illegal aliens who are in foreign countries today trying to get into this country, getting into the front of the line, on and on and on.

He took on the left. He took on the critical race theory. He took on the bigots who claim that you're the bigots. He did those things to take on the punitive liberals. As this gentleman Pearson wrote, that is the left, the punitive liberals. And now you can see why they want to jump out of the way, they're running wild in the Biden administration, they've taken over our government, they've taken over about budgets, they've taken over our policies.

They've taken over a bureaucracy after bureaucracy, and they don't intend to let go. Which is why with the Supreme Court did today when it came to the federal constitution, was extraordinarily damaging to the country. Because the only way we can get our country back is through elections. And if they fix the election so he can't win, and if the Supreme Court's in on it because of its laziness and its cowardliness. It's impossible. To get our republic back, it's impossible to uphold our institutions, it's impossible to protect our individualism and our liberty and our private property in a capitalist system.

I'll be right back. Much love in. No, it's fine. It's not it's not surmise it's my my, I think legitimate learned opinion that what Biden is doing here and we've talked about this last several weeks is trying to create a legacy for himself.

He wants to outdo Obama and he wants to outdo FDR. And in this, he's more like Bernie Sanders then, isn't he? Across the board, across the board, you can see what he's doing. Massive spending projects. These executive orders, which in my view are appallingly unconstitutional and they're the Supreme Court said. No, Mark, there's not a case before it it would sit there anyway. It's really amazing what's going on, the trajectory in our country, the the firewalls have been breached.

The court has participated in the deprecation of the. The separation of powers. And is participating in it. And you can see Republican senators. In the house, they're better, but the Republican senators really are rudderless. They have no agenda and they have no purpose, really. They get up and, you know, they may complain about what's going on, but they don't have any plan, they don't have any policies, they don't have any strategy.

And this is the McConnell problem I've said before, and I'm not going to forget, McConnell needs to go. We need some. You know, what we need is a Newt Gingrich.

We need a Newt Gingrich in the Senate. We need a Newt Gingrich in the Senate, and it's going to take somebody with guts. One of the conservatives who you all know and I all know, just one of them. To make a run in McConnell's leadership position, and they're going to fail once or twice, but to keep at it the way Gingrich kept at it when it came to Bob Michael. And they will be attacked by Politico, they'll be attacked by the Post and the Times and the rest, because that's the nature of the American media.

It is poisonous and it is corrupt. And they will help the Mitch McConnell of the world because they want the Mitch McConnell to be there because they're punching bags for the left. But that said. It's going to take one of them. It's going to take one of them to keep at it. It's going to take one of them to fight in the Republican primaries, it might be a two year, four year, six year project, but somebody needs to take that project and run with it.

Or it's not going to happen. And we need somebody to do that for the sake of the republic, quite frankly. But Biden's on a mission, and it's about his legacy, not about the country, not about your future, that's for sure. Every left wing radical kook idea he can pop with possibly a. You're listening to Denali, the great one, the great one, and you can call it now, eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one, I would encourage you to read Clarence Thomas dissent in today's Pennsylvania decision.

The first one. Outstanding, brilliant, as always. A man who really believes in fidelity to the rule of law in the Constitution has too many of the others simply don't give a damn.

And where is it written in the Constitution that we can federalize? Election loss. Now, I just want to give you a little bit of information, then we'll move on. I've mentioned this before. One of the sticking points for the conventions after the Constitution was adopted in Philadelphia and sent to the states. Was this issue of who would control? The election procedures, because the states understood, at least back then, they they wanted to guard and protect their own sovereignty, and they they were creating this federal.

National government. And they didn't want it to decide how elections would be determined in each state. The states already had election procedures. And back then, the states thought they were quite capable of doing them themselves, and they were and are. And so not only was there a big debate in Philadelphia at the constitutional convention. Underscoring that the state legislature would set the. The election laws in the state as well as so that would be continued, but that they would have an enormous influence on the choosing of a president, a vice president.

But that the federal government had no role other than setting ages certain other requirements for federal officials, it was up to the state. Now, as everything else that has been modified over the years and in some cases for good reason, we have our civil rights requirements and so forth.

But beyond that. Beyond that. Congress has no role whatsoever. None. In determining how elections are held in the states. And yet this Congress under the Democrats, under this bill, one which they're going to introduce now in early March, I just heard. They not only want to have some say in it, they want to have all saying it, they want the exact same voting system, automatic registration.

Mail in voting. No penalties for illegal aliens voting. Are you listening to me? No signature matching requirements. And it goes on and on and on, it's California. This is exactly what the framers. Exactly what the ratifiers objected to. They would never have agreed to this ever. But since the document was prepared by white supremacists in a white dominated society, I guess we don't care anymore dhuey. Now, the Democrat Party is trying to steal this country.

Listen to me, that Democrat Party is trying to steal the damn country. They're trying to steal our economic system. They're trying to steal our schools, they're trying to steal what goes on in the classrooms, they're trying to steal our elections by fundamentally altering constitutional requirements. They're trying to change the nature of the citizenry with open borders, if those people were voting Republicans coming across the border, they'd be voting 100 foot tall wall, 51 feet deep. Over and over again, I explain the point that the Democrat Party exists to empower itself and empower its base.

They don't even give a damn is in the base. Just empower the base. Yesterday, it was blue collar workers. Today it's illegal aliens, whatever it takes, power, power, power, just like their mother ship. That's right. Marxism. Did I say Marxism? Yes, I said Marxism. So the Democrat Party is trying to steal this country. Steal the voting system. Steal our institutions, devour our institutions. Health care, education, you name it.

And to impose their will, their radical hard left will on the rest of us. So there now more than happy to operate outside the constitutional confines, because again. Well, just say the Constitution's illegitimate, except when they use it for their purposes, and only then is it legitimate. I would love to sit down one day and have an honest intellectual debate with a Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer. It can't happen. It'll never happen. But I would love that Bernie Sanders I can't tell you how many times we've invited this guy on my programs.

I'd love to have an honest intellectual debate with these people. It's not possible. Because I know who they are, they know I know who they are. But it looks like if things aren't reversed in the next two years and certainly in the next four years, we're all going to be. Operatives. Of the Democrat Party, whether we like it or not, we're all going to be not operatives, the playthings of the Democrat Party, our taxes will go to their base and their cause.

Our efforts will go to their base and their cause. Our society will be rejiggered to go to their base in their cause. And that's it. And it's over. A one party country like a one party state in California are one party state in New York, are a one party state now in Illinois and are one party state and New Jersey are one party state in Rhode Island. And I can go on and on and on with these one party states, California.

That's their objective. Just like the Marxists, they don't blame the two parties for crying out loud, it's one party. They don't believe in debate debate what? You know, yeah, we can have a discussion, but within the confines of our belief system. You can't challenge your belief system. That's why you're seeing repression, that's why you're seeing this surrogates and big tech do what they're doing. That's why you're seeing big media doing what it's doing.

Your opinions are real legitimate. You're a throwback. And so why should you have access to the public square? Their violence is righteous. So how dare you criticize their violence? Even though you're consistent and you criticize all violence, not to them, some violence is acceptable and some ism. It's that simple. And that's why they protect Joe Biden, they know he's an idiot, but it doesn't matter. Joe Biden's on the same page, not because Joe Biden believes anything, Joe Biden's a chameleon.

Joe Biden believes in Joe Biden, just ask him. Now, because Joe Biden is building his legacy and the only way he can build a legacy. In the media and academia and the Democrat Party is hard left. And that's what he wants, that's what he wants the historians to write about him, that he outdid FDR, that he opted Obama, that he outdid Lyndon Johnson, embracing every crackpot radical theory burped up by some tenured jerk in some school.

Now, why do we have McConnell? And Cornyn and Thune. You don't even know what the hell's going on. They don't know what the hell is going on or they don't care. Really quite shocking. Absolutely shocking. Now. Let's take a listen to this. Why have we succumbed to. Scientific fascism and quackery. Because that's what we're hearing now, scientific fascism and quackery. Why is Anthony Falchi held up as such a great mind? There's a great piece by Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze today.

And which is absolutely eviscerates felching. I would suggest you check it out and Horowitz is one of the smartest around. But notice the same left wing media keep bringing fashion because Falchi is pushing their agenda. We have a highly politicized and partisan. Man of half a century. As head of the infectious disease operation in the country. He doesn't limit his commentary to his expertise or comment on anything, the economy, whether we should close borders.

How long you should wear your mask, his focus is on infectious diseases. He gets a million dollars from some group in Israel now because of I don't know why exactly, quite frankly. So the front of newspapers and magazines, he's recognized that he's never had it so good and while so many of you have been struggling. He was still making down, taking down a 400, 17000 a year plus pension plus medical benefits. God knows about bonuses, he was saying that it's you know, it's unfortunate that some of you are suffering, but we have to do this.

Well, he never suffered. The bureaucracy never suffered. They didn't miss a paycheck. The teachers union members, they didn't miss a paycheck, they didn't suffer. Just the people in the private sector pay for who pay for all this crap, they're the ones who have to suffer. They don't want a guaranteed payroll, guaranteed income, guaranteed pension or medical care. Got to work for every damn penny you get and they're the ones under attack. So here's Fouche on ABC's That's not this week at CNN, I think.

If it's Dana Bash, CNN. Or am I wrong, Mr. Producer? She was on he was on CNN today, this weekend. Let's listen to some of falsies wisdom cut to go.

You and the president have suggested that will approach normality toward the end of the year. What is normal?

First of all, Biden will never approach normalities an idiot. He's an abnormality. Go ahead, Americans will still be wearing masks, for example, in twenty twenty two.

So here we are. This is what Trump understood. He understood the idiocy of Foushee in the media, which is why he pushed so hard for vaccine. And how many times did he say it? We've got to kill this vaccine. We've got to use science, he's the guy that believed in science. We've got to use science to kill the vaccine. We can change our clothing, we can wear a mask, we can wear hats, we can wear sneakers, we can wear galoshes.

We can do whatever we want, but we've got to defeat it. And that was his mentality. It is not buying. So that's not falsies. Go ahead. You know, I think it is possible that that's the case and again, it really depends on what you mean by normal.

Why is this guy a spokesman for anything? Does he ever say anything that makes sense or does he ever say anything you don't already know? Does he ever say anything you don't you already don't know? What has he said has been profoundly important? I really don't even know. I've heard him say profoundly stupid things. Go ahead when I want you to define exactly the way you know, Dana, it's important because if normality means exactly the way things were before we had this happen to us, I mean, I can't predict that.

I mean, obviously, I think we're going to have a significant thanks for nothing.

Worth every penny, don't you think, Mr. Producer? Nobody else could fill his shoes. No, no. I think he wears a size three and a half. I'll be right back. Much love in. Well, I hope you had an opportunity to watch Life, Liberty and live in on Sunday.

I hope you had an opportunity to watch my segment that I posted on live TV at the Blaze TV network.

I spoke at some length about Rush. About some of the personal side of Rush. The relationship I had with him, which was absolutely fantastic in many ways, he was like a brother, as is his brother, David Limbaugh, and. And. Look, nobody's going to replace Rush. Nobody should even try. But as Rush once told me, just be yourself. Fight for the cause and do the very best you can. And that's what I've done here day in and day out for almost 20 years, and that's what I'll keep doing.

You know, I went back, I talked to my dear friend, Kathleen Kookie, he used to call her. Who did Russia's audio? I spoke to her today. She reminded me that it goes back to 1995 when I first began. Communicating back and forth with Rush and originally was through her. She would read something in The Wall Street Journal or The New York Post or what have you. Typically from a New York media outlet involving the law, the Constitution, she reached out to me.

I was at Landmark Legal Foundation. And I would type out answers, literally type them out on the computer, sometimes on a typewriter, and send them to her. I didn't use email back then. I didn't even know how. I didn't have an email address.

And I would send things to her and she would share them with Rush and. At one point, Rush said, who is this guy, who is this guy, the right sister? And he contacted me and he said, look. I want you to email me and we can talk to each other and. So forth, and I said, well, I don't email, he said, well, you damn well better start. You know, he was so advanced technologically, you might say, well, that's emailing.

But even back then it was. I mean, it occurred, but he was way ahead of the game. At the same email address I had then, Mr. Producer, as you know. And he would instant message me, this is before iPhones, as I recall, right on the computer. And we would do that until very, very late at night and early in the morning. For a lot from many, many years. And we would talk about the different issues, we would talk about family, as you know, I read from rescuing Sprite on this program and on my Sunday Fox show, by the way.

So now the book is unavailable on Amazon, it's sold out, Mr. Producer. That's what I'm told, and Barnes and Noble, it's like number five or number seven, and incidentally, any money I get from that book goes to helping dogs. But I hope they reveal, you know, Russia's view of faith. The view of God is you have life because it was absolutely profound and compelling. I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network.

Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by Aimé, the Association of Mature American Citizens, now over two million conservative members, Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Armacost U.S. Join me here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Lippman here, our number seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. I promise I'll get to your calls this hour, but I want to take a whack at this. One point nine trillion dollars in this covid billion.

Folks, you understand that the the debt is so massive now. That I don't think we're ever going to get it under control and that the consequence one day is going to be massive inflation. Now, can you imagine massive inflation in your current life? Where the price of energy is going through the roof and supplies are going to be limited given what Biden's doing. You see what happens in California, you've even seen what's happened in Texas, it can happen anywhere.

A nation that is an abundant. Reserve of fossil fuel. Over 40 percent of Texas energy came from alternative energy sources, including wind power. And the consequences were disastrous. Now, it's once in a God knows how long period of time that that sort of thing can happen. But not so in California, these policies, folks. Are going to be imposed on the entirety of the country. And we've talked about this degrowth movement, I've written about it and plunder and deceit, it's a degrowth movement.

It's not a green movement. It is an anticapitalism anti-Americanism degrowth movement. We have this pandemic and Joe Biden's taking credit for the benefits of the work that's been done before him. I have no idea what Joe Biden has done to increase the production and the availability of vaccines. He's done absolutely nothing. As we talked about in the first hour. But then we get this almost two trillion dollar spending bill, they make a one point nine trillion. So it doesn't sound like to try and of course.

And what are the Democrats do? They just have so much slop in this bill, it's unbelievable they pretend they're concerned about you, you know. But it's their base, as I tell you, over and over and over again. And Chris Enlow over at Bleys Media, alarming items stuffed inside House Dems, one point nine dollars billion stimulus bill, health surveillance, animal covid studies. Let's take a look at this. It's a bill that's 600 pages long.

And according to Reuters. Was stitched together by Democrat controlled House Budget Committee, filled with dozens of items completely unrelated to the pandemic. The bill would enact a key promise made by Biden and Democrats, increasing the federal minimum wage to fifteen dollars an hour by 2025.

So Gabbi. First, jobs for high school students, goodbye jobs for unskilled labor, because who's going to pay that? Nobody. And goodbye, multiple small businesses on top of the pandemic. This is what happens when you have people who've spent their entire lives in Washington, D.C., Schumer, Biden.

Pelosi might as well have. Animal covid studies 300 million dollars for the Agriculture Department to conduct monitoring and surveillance of susceptible animal animals for incidents of sars-cov-2 is guided by the World Health Organization for Animal Health. Socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, I'm so sick of this, you have no idea. I am so sick of this, you have no idea where a free country. You want to make something of yourself, get off your ass and make something of yourself, nobody's going to stop you.

Nobody. Addressing farm loans, the bill states the Agriculture Department shall provide a payment in an amount equal to 120 percent of the outstanding indebtedness of each socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher as of January 20, January one, 2021, to pay off the loan directly or to the socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher.

The purpose of debt payments is to, quote, alleviate discriminatory barriers preventing socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers from fully participating in the American farm economy. Is somebody stopping people from participating? The American farm economy must reduce.

The hell are they talking about? What did I say, this is all about the Democrat Party, the Democrat Party funding its base, redistributing wealth to its base, protecting its base, stealing authority, power and property from people who are not part of its base.

The bill also provides another billion dollars, we're now throwing around billions, hundreds of billions like it's nothing. Another billion to the same group for, quote, outreach, mediation, financial training, capacity building, training, cooperative development, training and support and other technical assistance to socially disadvantaged groups. So this pays off. A whole litany of consultants and operatives. And federal contractors. Student loan outreach. The bill allocates ninety one million dollars for the Department of Education, damn thing still there to prevent, prepare for and respond to coronavirus domestically or internationally, including direct outreach to students and borrowers about financial aid, economic impact payments, means tested benefits and tax benefits for which they are eligible.

Almost 100 million dollars. For the bureaucracy. Here's one, the bill allocates 135 million to the National Endowment for the Arts, another one hundred and thirty five million to the National Endowment for the Humanities. Now, we all know those are big spreaders here, Mr. Producer. Yes, the Endowment for the Arts and the Endowment for the Humanities. All this endowment stuff, you know, it could be a problem. I won't go any further. Meanwhile, the bill also allocates 200 million to the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Now, what does this have to do with anything? Nothing. The bill also gives 10 million dollars for the, quote, preservation and maintenance of Native American languages, unquote. First of all, how does paying money preserve and maintain Native American languages? Secondly, as you can see, this has absolutely nothing. Nothing. To do with the virus. Family planning. Which could include abortion gets 50 million. Global health, 750 million for quote, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to combat sars-cov-2, covid-19 and other emerging infectious disease threats globally, including efforts related to global health security.

I don't know what that means. Global disease detection. In response, global health protection, global immunization, global coordination. Well, isn't that what the State Department is supposed to do, health surveillance? Oh, this is a good one. The bill provides another half a billion dollars to support public health data, surveillance and analytics infrastructure, modernizing initiatives at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And 15 billion for airlines. And the idiot. The president.

So tell me what I should cut out. Let's listen to this, Mr. Producer, cut one on. Where is he today? He's at the White House today mumbling cut one go at the same time, we're increasing access by increasing oversight. I invite any inspector general in this program with jurisdiction over this program to closely look at these loans and report publicly report on any issues they uncover.

Well, let me help you out, genius. Already there was news reports of about 100 billion dollars out of all the money that's been spent so far. That's gone to waste, fraud and abuse. Did you see that, Mr. Blitzer? 100 billion. And I, I challenge any age range bricorama to check it out, read the newspaper, you moron. It's right there. Go ahead. We will ensure every dollar spent what you want with the shovel ready crap, you are in charge of that you are in charge of Solyndra.

This guy is such a liar. His false teeth are even chattering away on short of money is well spent. No, you won't. And how will you do that? Go ahead. Much needed, long overdue to help to small businesses who really need help staying open.

They really need help staying open. Well, then why don't you call your governor friends and tell them to let them open? They don't need you. They don't need the bureaucracy to get fat off of their problems. Go ahead, maintaining jobs and making ends meet, maintaining jobs, you know, like the Keystone XL pipeline. Energy jobs, good paying jobs, we can't have those. We're going to make propeller's and battery operated socks. Go ahead is a starting point, not the ending point.

We need Congress to pass my American rescue plan.

Oh, this is the American rescue plan. Thank God we have the American rescue plan, another one point nine trillion. The stupid names they call her profligate spending, go ahead, deals with the immediate crisis facing our small businesses. Now, critics say the plan is too big. Let me ask the rhetorical question. What would you have me cut?

All right. I'll tell you what I just added up here. Several tens of billions of dollars, federal minimum wage increase, animal covid study, socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, money for these things. Student loan outreach, fine arts, museums, Native American languages. I don't even know what you're doing there. Neither do you, you idiot. Let's see. Family planning, I guess more abortion, health surveillance, airlines. Once you start there, why don't you cut there and while you're at it, cut Falchi salary in half.

We're over half a million dead. You just said today as a result of Kova, those are your words. Well, who's the infectious disease guy? Yeah, who's he how come he's never held to account? I'll be right back. Much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them, a man who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk.

AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us.

We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

Jim in New Jersey, the great WIBC Gaucher. Hey, Mark, love this show first I'd like to give out my my thoughts and prayers to the Limbaugh family. You know, he was a great man and we're going to miss him. Keep yourself healthy. We need you to let me go to my comment. The Democrats are like the mobsters. Back in the day, they would throw rocks through the windows of the stores, burn the stores until the owners, you know, until they relented.

And what they did with Schumer up there screaming, We're going to come for you, Gossage. We're going to come for you. Cavnar That was the rock through the window. Cavnar will never do a controversial vote after what he went through. Gorsuch Same thing. They're worried about the mobs going in front of the houses, chanting, writing on the walls. They really are sort of like domestic terrorists. They they do what they need to do to take control of the people.

Mm hmm. There is a lot of that, that's for sure. I appreciate your call, my friend. Let's keep going. Let's go to Wade in Roxbury, Vermont, XM Satellite. How are you, Wade?

Good, Mark. That was a great tribute you did for Rush on Sunday night. Life, Liberty and Marvin. He really will be sorely missed. Amen. My question is that I'm so upset with us. Do not the Supreme Court with their dereliction of duty. And I'm wondering if there is any way that constitutional scholars such as yourself can get together and maybe bring some impeachment charges or malfeasance.

First of all, I can't bring charges against Supreme Court justices. I'm sorry.

Impeachment is something only the House of Representatives can do. So we can all get together, but we can't do anything.

And unfortunately, the cast was set, though, many, many, many, many decades ago, early in our history, that justices are not impeached for their opinions. If they have a case, though, where they clearly were in areas such as I don't, don't, don't, don't, don't keep going down this road, there's nothing anybody can do. So if they have a case, you know, they the Supreme Court wrote the Taney Justice Taney wrote the decision in the Dred Scott case.

Judge Taney was a racist, so segregationist and he upheld slavery. Do you think he should have been impeached? Sure. Well, you're not sure there are enough of the case? Well, I just told you the case and he should have been impeached, but they they had decided decades before that we don't impeach justices for their opinions. So the answer is we can all get together, but there is no answer. I have family members when I say this is this and they say, well, what can we do about it?

What do you mean, what can we do, but what can we do about it? We lost. We fight another day. There's nothing I can do about it. These justices have to be much more carefully examined. I warned people about Kavanaugh. I was one of the only ones behind a microphone to warn people about Kavanaugh that he would start to buckle and starting to buckle.

I'm shocked at Amy CONI, be honest with you.

We'll see how she conducts herself.

But there was never any doubt about Clarence Thomas decades and decades ago and never really any doubt about Sam Alito, quite frankly, as there was no doubt about Scarless.

I mean, Scalia and that's the kind of person you need to get on the bench and we had people like that, we knew John Roberts was. Was iffy and we had we had the potential justices, but when I got behind this microphone and I dared to raise even some questions about Kavanaugh, Mr. Bruce, you remember what happened.

I was attacked. Now, I understand the enemy, the Democrat Party, I understand the media, I understand how vicious they are and we want to rally around. But we rally around and sometimes it just isn't what it's supposed to be, Cavanaugh, McConnell, when when when Trump was trying to decide whether to nominate Kavanaugh or CONI, it was McConnell who pressed Trump. Turn to nominate cabinet because he said he'd be much easier to confirm she's too rigid.

Well, didn't exactly work out that way. But as Amy Comi continues to roll like this, then she's no better than the rest of them, despite all the efforts, despite what President Trump did and so forth, we're not asking her to rule for President Trump. We're asking her to rule on the Constitution.

She failed miserably today miserably. So to answer your question, no matter how many times I'm going to be asked, no, we can't get together and impeach anybody.

No, they're not going to be impeached. And no, you can't bring a lawsuit against a Supreme Court justice because guess who gets to hear those cases?

All right, Wade, thank you for your call, my friend. People are always disappointed when I say these things to them. Sometimes in person, though, stare at me and say, what do you mean we can't do anything? OK, and it's always the we we can't do anything you guys need to get together, you guys need to do this. Look at Vermont. That poor guy stuck in Vermont. Wait. Look at the two crap senators from from Vermont.

So my question is, what are you going to do about it? Well, we can't. We. OK. Well, we need to make sure we can do is have mobility when we need to make sure we can do, even though we may not want to do it, is have the ability to pick up and leave and go to a free state. That that embraces the morality and the principles that we believe in and what the Democrats are trying to do is to make sure no such state exists.

So this in and of itself is an important battle in each and every state that's not, you know, dark blue in these red states. Look what's happening to Texas. Texas is right on the line right now. It's right on the cusp because of immigration policy. And Biden knows that. The Democrats know that's what they're trying to do. I had a family member write me today and say, you know, we're doing pretty good among Hispanics, 35 percent.

They're doing better, 65 percent. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy.

Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead a c us.

Mark Lovette, America's any hotter call now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. You know, it's really weird, Mr. Producer.

Several weeks ago, I was really jumping into the critical race theory stuff going on in the country, remember, been doing an enormous amount of research, not just people who are looking into and reporting on it, but a really deep dive into the history and the so-called scholars behind it, reading the most monotonous books you can possibly imagine.

And I came on the air and I've spent a lot of time on it. Now it's all over TV, if you notice that. Tolerate TV, it's all over blogs and so forth. This is the way it works here. It really is so. I guess it's OK. I guess I should be better about it, don't you think? No, not really, I don't think so, because I'll give you an example after this show. I'll get something to eat, my beautiful wife.

And then I will be working at my desk. Doing more research, more analysis and more writing. It really is amazing to see how many people out there put their names and pictures and photos on books and haven't really written the books, they edit them, they like to say.

Anybody who's written a book, I mean, a substantive nonfiction book knows how much work goes into it. It's a real task, even if you love doing it. I love doing it. Some days you hate doing it, but overall, I love doing it. You can't be a teeny bopper, you can't be, you know, having a normal weekend life, a normal night life and so forth, when you are under a contract and have a deadline to produce a book, it doesn't work that way.

Particularly if you're doing a three hour radio show and a couple of one hour TV shows. But I watch these guys, it's like and let me tell you about Georgia, let me tell you about it. And I'm thinking, what are you going to tell us what somebody else told you and what somebody else wrote for?

I'm just being honest. Look, I'm just being honest. I pride myself on doing my own work. And I do that not only because I have self-respect, but respect for you. You know, we have people who mock Joe Biden for being a plagiarist, and yet they don't do anything differently in some ways. Just just pointing it out. Let's go to Ron Baltimore, Maryland, the great WME. How are you, Ron? All right, thank you very much.

OK, you mentioned that the founding fathers, I think particularly Madison, said that the Constitution would only work for a society where the people were virtuous. Well, they always had it.

But in particular, John Adams wrote fairly extensively about it. OK, so and then my question is, well, it would seem that society today is not the kind of society that those folks envisioned. So where does that leave us? What's the best we can hope for? If the Constitution is not going to work, where does that leave us?

Where do you think it leaves us? Well, I think the best we could hope for would seem to be something like a benevolent dictatorship or something like that, and most dictatorships are not benevolent, I can tell you that.

Well, most aren't. That's that's for sure. So that's that is a problem.

And the only hope I can see for this, I think about half the country is virtuous in that sense, and about half the country is destructive and half the country is narcissistic and half the country makes demands on the other half. They want free stuff.

They have a chip on their shoulder, they demand that their own stuff. These are the people as an ideology. This is pressed by the Marxists and the neo Marxists as an ideology. These are the people who are destroying the country and intentionally so. So that's the battle we have. And as for a benevolent dictatorship, I don't think they'd be very benevolent based on what I'm saying in the States and so forth. You. Well, no, that's that's that's part of the problem, I think the only hope would be is if we could have some kind of a religious revival of some kind.

Well, who knows what religious revival, but how about we work harder? For instance, I'm not going to put you on the spot, but I don't think you show up at school board meetings or town meetings. I don't think you spent a line a lot a lot of time getting in the way or lobbying your senator or your congressman or doing things of that sort, a convention of states.

How about we do things that are staring us right in the face rather than surrendering and imagining what could be over the mountain? That's my view anyway.

All right, sir, thank you for your call, ma'am. People are ready to give up without even fighting. Mr. Producer, have you noticed that? Mr. Producers don't give up now, but you do you get the point it's ridiculous. People who put their lives on the line for this country and have in the past, well, I don't know, I guess we don't know virtuous people. So what a benevolent dictatorship, a religious revival.

You can throw around every idea you want if you're not hands on. If you don't have your head in the game, it's not going to matter. Twice say this plural, we we need to this we need to. That means you're not going to do anything. Now, I'm not talking to all of you, obviously, but you get my point. People would rather complain than act. Not on the left, they act, they complain and they act, they act and they complain.

Let's go to Marvin Tallahassee, Florida. How are you, Marvin? Thank you, Mark, the great WFLA. How are you? I'm doing really, really well, thank you so much, I wanted to be able to say I'm very thankful for Donald Trump. I live in Tallahassee, 70 years old. I got my first vaccine because of President Trump. And if he hadn't given us that vaccine, who knows where all of us would be, how many more lives would have been lost?

I got the vaccine about a month before the inauguration. I got the second one.

Wow. How did you get it so fast? You're only 70. Excuse me. How did you get it so fast? I found out I found out that the health department in Tallahassee had the vaccine. Somebody just called me and said, you know, they're doing that today. And this was in January. I said I said, OK, let me go check on it. So I called immediately.

But do you agree with me that Democrats excuse me, that Republicans should be in the frontline getting vaccines first?

Because we elected Trump, we supported his administration and the Democrats were downplaying, if not outright attacking, the idea of an early vaccination. So why aren't we getting them first and why aren't they having to wait for us?

Well, obviously, we got it first and you did, but you're not everybody, are you? Well, no, no, Mark, I'm a Republican who hasn't got the you're missing my point, sir. It's OK. It's OK. We are the whole country knows you got your vaccination. Go ahead.

No, OK. Yes, OK, get vaccinations. I just want to let you know that Biden is just absolutely doing, I think, the opposite of what DeSanto is doing. Wouldn't that be an amazing meeting? If the two ever got together? We would have a chance of having a country think alike, like maybe if the two of them would talk about what works and what's not working. The scientist is amazing in Florida.

OK, two different things to Santurce is one of the great leaders right now in the country. There's absolutely no question about it.

But you ask a second quote, wouldn't it be amazing if they got together? You really think Joe Biden's going to get together with the scientists and try and take tips from DeSanto? No, sir. But what if he has what if he has a moment of clarity maybe? Thanks for your call. What am I missing tonight? Rich. I missing something. If he is a moment of clarity, wouldn't it be amazing if they got together? It's not going to happen.

Biden's not going to do that. Can we as a people impeach the Supreme Court justices? I'm not trying to be rude. I'm just saying where is this stuff coming from? Well, people are frustrated, that's OK, be frustrated. But focus energy on what can be done about these things. Biden is not going to ask the Santurce for advice. No, we can't impeach Supreme Court justices.

Everybody knows that, I think. So we have to come up with practical ideas and practical ideas are all in front of you. We haven't even exercised them yet. In our own lives, we have an exercise them yet. I mean, there's a thousand things you can do to organize in your neighborhoods, to go to school board meetings, to I mean, I used to do these things and. You just got to think about your own life, what you can do, not if Biden is going to reach out to scientists, that's not going to happen, not if a group of scholars are going to get together and impeach Supreme Court justices.

That's not even on the table.

I'll be right back. Much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join AMOC instead a a C U.S..

You know his piece. By Machsom lot at Fox News and its outstanding piece, it's headlined Inside Wikipedias, Leftist by socialism pages whitewashed communist atrocities buried.

The days of Wikipedia's robust commitment to neutrality are long gone, says co-founder Larry Sanger, big tech has faced repeated accusations of bias and censorship, but one platform has escaped much scrutiny. Wikipedia now not here. For years, I've talked about how Wikipedia. Has lied about me and lied about other conservatives and is a leftist operation for years. I even fought with them on the air. And you even helped me fight with them on the air, remember that, Mr.

Producer, for years, at least a decade, we've been fighting them. So I needed to add that footnote to the piece, the online encyclopedia, which claims anyone can edit, is the 13th most popular website in the world, according to Alexa's Web rankings.

Google gives it special placement and search results, no doubt about that. But critics, including Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sangar, tell Fox News that many Wikipedia pages have been merely left wing advocacy essays. I should have wrote this piece, The days of Wikipedia's robust commitment to neutrality are long gone. Co-founder Larry Sanger said Wikipedia's ideological and religious bias is real and troubling, particularly in a resource that continues to be treated by many as an unbiased reference work.

Wikipedia pages related to socialism and communism contained stark examples. The two Page Pate excuse me, the two main pages for socialism and communism spent a massive 28000 words and they contained no discussion of the genocides committed by socialist and communist regimes, which tens of millions of people were murdered and starved. The omission of large scale mass murder, slave labor and manmade famines and neglect and negligent and deeply misleading economics professor Bryan Caplan, who has studied the history of communism, told Fox News.

The pages include plenty of history, Kaplan noted, and are not confined to just philosophical complaints claims. But the history focuses on flattering claims. Wikipedia's socialism page announces, quote, The Soviet era saw some of the most significant technological achievements of the 20th century. You believe this?

It ignores a man made famine in which Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin commandeered the food from regions like Ukraine and Kazakhstan, and we wrote about that and on freedom of the press. As for comment, a Wikimedia Foundation spoke said he had sent a statement noting that Wikipedia is a living, breathing project G.

Can you imagine how stupid they are to use those words? We're living and breathing and is always evolving, just as our shared understanding of a topic does. The response also noted the foundation does not directly control content on Wikipedia, which is written by volunteer editors.

You know, there was a great piece not that long ago and Breitbart. By one of the gentlemen who was involved in in the in Wikipedia. And he used my case as an example, as well as some of the others, and he explained that you have a couple of editors in particular who are. Who are on the site constantly involving editing all kinds of things, so-called volunteers. No accountability whatsoever. The Wikipedia socialism page also mentions China's Communist Party, but only begins its description in 1976 after Mao's reign of terror had already killed tens of millions.

After Mao Zedong's death in 1976, China's economic performance pulled an estimated 150 million peasants out of poverty. The encyclopedia says because he killed 60 million people, but who's counting?

Doesn't mention mouse prior communist programs such as his Great Leap Forward, which private farming was abolished, leading to mass famine that killed tens of millions, or the Cultural Revolution and the Red Guards and all the rest, the mass killings under communist regimes?

No. And it goes on and on Wikipedia, ladies and gentlemen, is not only unreliable, it is a viciously operated propaganda.

A platform. Which I would strongly discourage you from using strongly. If you want another test, you don't need one, but if you do go in there and look me up, you won't even recognize me there. Just to Mark Levin and Wikipedia. It's disgusting, my family doesn't even recognize me. Because some slob there sits on his sofa and his mother's basement in his boxer shorts. You know, busy eating a Hershey bars and showers every four or five days.

Can't grow a beard, but nonetheless tries. And they're the typesetter, the editors over there at Wikipedia, they've destroyed Wikipedia, the left destroys everything, doesn't it? It destroys our cities and our states. It destroys our economy, destroys our immigration system into not only you don't understand, this is progress. No, it's not progress. It's destruction. And so, of course, they've destroyed the media, they've destroyed our schools, our universities, they've destroyed Hollywood and even Wikipedia.

Imagine that. I want to thank you for joining us. Ladies and gentlemen. I very much appreciate you. We salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters and emergency personnel. I'm just sorry we cannot impeach Supreme Court justices. You and I don't have that power. I can't fix it. See you tomorrow. From the Westwood One podcast network.