Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we once again made contact with our leader, Mark. America, Mark Levin, our number is eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one 877 three eight one three eight one one. While everybody in Washington is focused on the United States Senate. Supposedly, the Constitution, Joe Biden is violating the constitution left and right and the Democrats in Congress seek to do exactly the same thing.

And such is the evidence of a declining republic. We have a Roman Senate now. And Cesar, a low IQ, Cesar, in the White House. While Rome burns. Nero fiddled. I want to address a few things here first, our friend and our friend Ted Cruz has posted an op ed I. So he wants us to talk about it's public, it's on his website. It's also the Fox News site, and it's one of the rare occasions where I strongly disagree with him.

As I will demonstrate now. He said. The constitutional question of whether a former president can be impeached or tried after he has left office is a close legal question.

To close legal question. It's a close legal question. Really? It's never been done before to a president. What makes it a close legal question exactly, but let's read on. On balance, I believe that the better constitutional argument. Is that a former president can be impeached and tried that is that the Senate has jurisdiction to hold a trial. Now, let's stop there. Cruz isn't just saying that a former president could be tried. He's saying a former president could be impeached after he's left office.

He could be impeached and tried, apparently, after his left office. He says, however, nothing in the text of the Constitution requires the Senate to choose to exercise jurisdiction.

Now we're walking a tightrope. They're not required to do it, but they can do it. He goes on, in these particular circumstances, I believe the Senate should decline to exercise the jurisdiction. And so I voted to dismiss this impeachment on jurisdictional grounds. The question was whether or not. This trial violates jurisdictional grounds, was it, Mr. Producer? The question was whether it was constitutional or not. And 44 senators voted that it was not constitutional. The question before the Senate wasn't.

Whether it should be dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. And it certainly wasn't based on the question of whether it should be dropped on jurisdictional grounds, even though the Senate has the constitutional authority to proceed, although it need not. So that question was never posed to the Senate. Let's move on. Article one, Section two of the Constitution gives the House the sole power of impeachment, quote unquote, and Section three gives the Senate the sole power to try all impeachments, quote unquote.

At the time the Constitution was adopted, there was meaningful debate over whether impeachment encompassed so-called late impeachment. That is after the person that left office. He goes on, and by the way, what did the meaningful debate conclude that. It concluded that impeachment. Does not have to substitute for indictment, that is for criminal violations. It certainly presents no information, not a syllable of information. That supports the idea that a private citizen, formerly a public official, according to Ted, can be impeached and tried by the Senate while a citizen.

Can you imagine, ladies and gentlemen? And I know my friend Ted is a very, very bright. I'm sure he's heard of bills of attainder. They are specifically unconstitutional. But let's move on. The British common law. Which inform the understanding the founders suggest that the better answer is yes, the British common law was considered by the founders.

But not embraced by the founders. In fact, some of the language that was used in British common law was adopted, some of it was specifically rejected. Diverting to British common law in this respect adds absolutely nothing. To the debate, nothing, zero. You have to go there and discuss it extensively, and I've read it extensively. If you wish to make the argument. That the Senate. Wait, that the House can impeach a private citizen and the Senate can try a private citizen.

Not ladies and gentlemen. We textualists in originalists, we don't we don't need to chase tails here talks about the president. Talks about removal and perhaps the prevention from seeking. Future office. The language of the Constitution. And the discussion at the constitutional convention supports none of this. He says in the 18th century, there were two English impeachment's of note, Lord Chancellor Macclesfield in 1725 and India's Governor-General Warren Hastings that was famous the Hastings trial, which extended from eight 1787 to 1795.

Both were late impeachment's after they had left office. So what? Shortly after the founding, a third British impeachment occurred, Lord Melvoin 1886, his impeachment also occurred after he left office. So what? The framers of the Constitution, ladies and gentlemen, weren't drones who just sat there and said, you know, we're going to adopt everything the British did. Quite the contrary. We don't have a parliament, do we? With a completely different kind of judiciary, don't we?

We actually have a constitution, they don't have a constitution, right? So they would embrace what they thought was smart from the British or what they thought was smart from from the ancients. They read Aristotle and Cicero. They read Sydney, they told us what they did. They told us exactly what they did. You don't have to read tea leaves. And while it's true they looked at British common law and impeachment, they did adopt it, they adopted certain phrases and so forth.

But there's nothing in our written document and nothing in our history, nothing at the constitutional convention that even suggests that the House can impeach a private citizen after they've left office and the Senate can try a private citizen after they've left office. And it's never been done when it comes to the president of the United States. He says, to be sure, there's textual ambiguity on the question of whether impeachment's of a former president are constitutional. To be sure, I don't think there are.

One can look to other provisions of the Constitution to say, now we got we looked at British common law, Mr. Producer, and now we're looking to other provisions of the Constitution. One could look to other provisions of the Constitution, such as Article two, Section four, as reference to the president, not a president, Ted, really.

And that same section's language that says an impeached individual who's convicted shall be removed from office and conclude in good faith that the late impeachments are not permissible. Now, I don't conclude in good faith, I conclude in good faith and unequivocally. However, given the historical underpinnings and the Constitution's broad textual commitment, SoloPower OK.

All right. I don't want to create any embarrassing situation here. I really don't. I really don't. So power doesn't mean plenary power. So power means you still have to comply with the language of the Constitution, so power means the House has sole power of impeachment as opposed to, say, the Senate as opposed to, say, the judiciary.

As opposed to, say, the president against other branches, that's what SoloPower means. It doesn't mean plenary power, they don't say plenary power. I believe the best reading of the Constitution is that the Senate retains jurisdiction. The president is no longer president. He's left office so he can't be removed, but the Senate retains jurisdiction. This is where you have to go, ladies and gentlemen. This is where you have to go if you want to embrace this idea.

That the Senate has the power. To chase down a former official, now a private citizen. Importantly, there are two types of jurisdiction, he says, mandatory and discretionary. Well, this is neither mandatory nor discretionary. There's no jurisdiction zero. With mandatory jurisdiction, the tribunal must hear the case with discretionary jurisdiction, that tribunal can decide whether to exercise its legal authority to hear the case. For example, the vast majority of the Supreme Court's case, this has nothing to do with the Supreme Court's caseload.

For example, the vast majority of the Supreme Court's caseload arises on discretionary jurisdiction as the authority to hear most cases doesn't have to, and nothing in the Constitution makes the Senate's impeachment jurisdiction mandatory power means sole power. The Senate can decide whether they hear the case. And here we go to La La Land. Here we go to La La Land. There's several errors in this piece, there's several diversions in this piece. I'll leave it alone. I'll leave it as it is.

I'll leave it alone, I'll leave it as it is. And so what Ted is doing here is he's saying, well, of course, it's a close question, but I come down on the side that the Senate can, in fact.

Hold a trial on a private citizen who was once a public official or president, in fact, he takes it further. They can be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. Mr.. After the fact. They can be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. Then the matter is sent to the Senate and they can have a trial on whether to remove them from office. Well, he's already out, but to ban him forever from ever serving in office again. Ladies and gentlemen.

If Ted's right and I'm wrong. Where is the specific language in Madison's notes? The best. Information we have on what took place in the constitutional convention supporting Ted's position, where is it? It's nowhere. How about the commentary? By three, and especially two of the most prominent individuals, the delegates, Hamilton and Madison, and of course, Jay. There's nothing in there that supports it, nothing, not a word. Not a word. And here we are.

I'll be right back. Much love in. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair. So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today and living for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. I don't know. I don't know why people say what they say or write what they write, they believe it honestly.

I have a friend of mine, probably not anymore. He's quite the leftist and he writes me and he says, you know, it's clear that Donald Trump didn't care if any lives were lost at that.

I said, finally, finally, you're a hack, you're a liberal hack, don't even bother me anymore. Don't even bother me anymore. It's just incredible. And they will forgive Antifa and they will forgive Black Lives Matter and they will forgive anything they have to forgive.

I'm just telling you, this is a. A percentage of the left. An individual who I thought was intelligent, you know, cerebral, still liberal. But apparently not. His knee jerk. You don't care if somebody dies. I thought you said that about a liberal, if they ever say that about a Democrat public official, Mr. Butler, ever.

And this is what the guy says, so I'm not wasting my time with this guy anymore. It's just unbelievable. When we come back, I have mail, by the way, when we come back. We only have a few minutes left here I want to walk through. I want to get the other stuff that I want to walk through this impeachment stuff in the meantime, I want to bring up Mark Cuban. Now, I know that these NBA stadiums aren't full because of local and state rules.

But there is no way you could ever get me to pay for a ticket. To go to a basketball game that involves the Mavericks because they're owned by Mark Cuban. I have never understood this fascination with Mark Cuban. Have you noticed conservatives and people on Fox and elsewhere, they embrace this guy? Have you noticed that, Mass-producing? They have a laugh arama with this guy. Maybe Mark Cuban is not aware that only in America can a jackass like him be worth four billion dollars.

Only in America, you jerk. You jerk, what's that other show they have? Tell me, Mr. Producer, I know you like it. Tell me anyway, what's it called, Shark Tank. Shark Tank is good despite Mark Cuban, who's the fall guy. He's the funny guy, Mr. Wonderful. Kevin O'Leary makes that show, period, if he wasn't there, there'd be no show.

Mark Cuban sits on the end with that constipated Jake Tapper look on his face, he contributes nothing. There's a jerk that he's a great patriot. America. He's done so many great things. Here's a guy who lives in the lap of luxury, unimaginable wealth, but he owns his own pools. The national anthem. Why he's down for the revolution. That's why. What a schmuck. I'll be right back. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair.

So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today at Leavin for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. Blasting conservative fire, the Mark Levin Show, a call now at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

All right, let's begin.

So out in the open. Day after day. Night after night. Long before the election, long before January 6th. President Trump was plotting and conspiring. To incite an insurrection. In broad daylight. In front of millions of millions of Americans. But we just didn't realize, you see. So the Democrats want to make sure the House managers and the media that now we understand. Now, they didn't tell us this at the time, of course, there were no impeachment articles drawn up in August or September.

No, no, no. So this was happening, you see. We just didn't realize we weren't listening carefully enough. What idiocy? I would call this a kangaroo court, but I like kangaroos. I'm sure Chinese guy is is thrilled by what he's watching. Let's go over this again. You cannot impeach or try a private citizen. There's no support for that in the Constitution, in Madison's notes, in the Federalist Papers or any other document, none.

You can look at British common law. You can look at German common law. Has nothing to do with it. There's no chief justice of the United States sitting is the presiding officer. No power to prohibit former President Trump from running again. It's a rogue impeachment that violated every notion of justice since the Enlightenment. No due process, no hearing, no evidence, no witness, no cross-examination, nothing. It's the French Revolution. All they need is to bring a guillotine to the Senate.

They don't need to waste all these numbers a day. Yes, send out. The Capitol Police for firing Donald Trump from our logo to the Senate floor and used the guillotine. Effectively, that's what they're trying to do. The Constitution has essentially been rewritten by the Senate to penalize a single citizen. Donald Trump. That's an unconstitutional bill detainer that is not written about by either Chuck Cooper the other day or Ted Cruz today. These senators as a whole.

Make it the worst Senate since the 1960s or the early 70s. When Joe Biden was pallin around and befriending segregationists. From the south. There's not an American court in this land, I don't care if it's an Obama judge, I don't care who it is. That would have allowed any of those videos. Of the rioting, of the mayhem to be admissible in a court now why? And the same applies here, why would you do that? Because it has nothing to do.

But the relevance. Of the man who is said to be on trial. It's inflammatory. There's nothing to do with any evidence, specific or detailed or otherwise. Relating to the conduct of the president of the United States in terms of the violence that took place on Capitol Hill, so videos of that kind would never be admissible.

What you've proven is that there was a riot, a violent riot, an attack on the capital, that the individuals in the video were the criminals who did it. That's what they've demonstrated. We already knew this. That's all they demonstrated. They showed affidavits signed by defendants in criminal cases now that have been brought. Where their lawyers write it up and they sign it blaming the president for their alleged crimes, they know the president wanted them to do these crimes.

That's what they took his words to mean. That's not admissible, that proves nothing. Everyone knows it's B.S. Every judge is going to know that's B.S.. That has no effect on the innocence or guilt or evidence, for that matter, relating to the president. Period. And yet it's allowed in this chamber, the star chamber. And they go back President Trump's allegations of fraud and stolen election and went on and on and on. Oh, my God.

He tweeted this and he said that. Can you believe it? That has absolutely no legal relevancy there whatsoever. That's inadmissible. What does that demonstrate? While he was mobilizing, you don't have any facts that he mobilized anybody to do anything, you even presented a single shred of evidence. Tying the president of the United States to that riot, you don't have a single shred of evidence tying the president of the United States to incitement. You don't have a single shred of evidence that the press of the United States was behind an insurrection, nothing.

You public video. Your public affidavits. You're a public social media, you've presented us with nothing, absolutely nothing. And if allegations of fraud in an election are a stolen election. Or evidence of inciting an insurrection or inciting a riot, you would have to take crime tape and wrap the entire Congress with it because every one of these damn bastards would be guilty of it. In fact, you'd have to go to Westchester, New York, and bring out Brunhilde to.

Because we've now learned from Ted and others that you can actually impeach and try a former official who better to impeach and try them than Hillary Clinton, former secretary of state. Right. Now, the House managers are a bizarre group. One of them slept with a Chinese spy, still sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, was making the case for trying Donald Trump. President Geia, China must be pleased. Swalwell directly or indirectly doing his handiwork, they have this guy, Raschein.

Raschein. The head manager, the lead manager. Now, it's precious to have Raschein their senses challenged certifications in past elections himself before, did you know that? But that's OK. It's Washington, it's the Congress. Democrats do whatever they want and Republicans roll over. Now, what's missing? After all the video, all the graphics, all the speeches by the House managers, what's missing? Evidence. After all this time, all these resources, all the money that the House has, the Senate has, the Democrats have, the media have.

Evidence, there's not even a smoking gun, where's the information? There's no evidence of incitement or trying to. You know, create a riot situation or let alone an insurrection. In fact. The evidence that does exist is utterly exculpatory. What do you mean, Mark? The former president made available to authorities in Washington in early January. Is the public statement, the Mark Meadows, and it could be checked by anybody, 10000 National Guardsmen to protect the city.

The city chose not to use them. McConnell and Pelosi apparently chose not to use them for whatever reason. So as I underscored yesterday, we are to believe that the President Trump mobilized. And incited an insurrection against the very National Guardsmen who he made available to protect the city. Now, this is my second day raising this point, and I haven't seen it reported once by these so-called NEWSROOM's. Because it's utterly irrational, the entire argument that's being made.

By the Democrats makes no sense. What are the evidence that these militant groups, where is it? One of the evidence of these militant groups were placing their. We're planning their attack well before the president spoke on January 6th. Well, that doesn't mean anything, you see, because for months and months and months, he was talking about a a stolen election and so forth.

So, you know, of course it does, because at first they said it was spontaneous. Now they've changed their position, it's been going on for months. In full public view, right in front of our faces, we just didn't know that the president was inciting an insurrection. What are the evidence that the FBI and law enforcement knew of preplanning, they did nothing. Effective anyway. Or the sergeant of arms of the House and the Senate who report to Pelosi, McConnell respectively, what about him and them and the chief of the police that told them, you better bring in the National Guard?

This looks big. And they didn't. Why didn't Pelosi McConnell act, were they not told? Now, let's deal with this argument that President Trump raised questions about the election well before January six attack, this is a sleazy slip and fall lawyer effort to say, wait a minute, we know that there was preplanning.

But that's also on Trump, you see, because he was he was mobilizing earlier than we could possibly realize, you see.

I have a question for you. They say he was trying to undermine the legitimacy of the election four months. Tell me who raised questions about the. Ability of the United States post office to handle massive mail in voting, Mr. Producer, who raised that question? The Democrats. The Democrats, they said that Donald Trump was purposely cutting back funding for the post office and they understood that there were actually mailboxes being moved out of minority areas. So to make it more difficult for Democrats to vote.

Just in case Trump won, quote unquote, they wanted to be able to say what? The fix was in, right? Oh, he was cutting funds to the post office. Meanwhile, none of that happened. Oh, they're under serving the the Democrat areas, remember that? All kinds of conspiracy theories. What was that intended to do, ladies and gentlemen? That was intended to. Raised serious questions, should Donald Trump be prez in the United States about the legitimacy of the election and him?

As a reelected president who brought that up, the Democrats brought that up. They were already talking about voter suppression, not just LeBron James, but the Democrat long lines in Democrat neighborhoods, the lack of polling places in minority neighborhoods, that's intentional. That's intentional in order to suppress the vote. We didn't hear about that after the election. But why did they bring that up? To delegitimize the November election, should Donald Trump win. That's why. I see and keep in mind, this is this was done.

Even after four years of the Russia collusion lies a criminal investigation. House investigation on and on and on. On and on and on. Now, I want to give you an example. People have asked me, OK, give me an example of incitement, I'm going to give you an example of language that you can consider incitement. That's at least closer to the mark. OK. Closer to the mark. Something like. I want to tell you, Pelosi, I want to tell you Schumer.

You released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you. If you go forward with these awful decisions. Can you imagine if Donald Trump had said that? I don't think they'd want to hear anything else in the Senate to, you know. But Chuck Schumer said that. He said it in March of 2020. I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you've released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.

You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. It was so bad that the chief justice of the United States refused to show up for this sham trial, issued a statement admonishing Schumer.

Can you imagine if Donald Trump had said that on Election Day excuse me, on January 6th? And there was a mob that formed at the Supreme Court. There was a mob banging on their 13 foot high bronze door and there were mobs assembled by Schumer and the Democrats during the cabinet hearings to disrupt the hearings they get in the faces of United States senators in the elevators. Whatever happened to the ethics complaint filed against Chuck Schumer? Meanwhile, Chuck Schumer is a juror.

In the unconstitutional case against citizen Trump. I'll be right back. Much love in. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair. So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today.

We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain. We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth.

Begin learning today. And Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

I will be on Hannity tonight on the Fox News Channel nine, thirty PM Eastern, please don't miss it.

And I'm going to use among all the arguments here, too, that were just sent to me from a dear friend of mine, Aisa, so I'll say.

Great lawyer, two brilliant points in a moment, why haven't the House managers play the endless clips? In front of the Senate. Of all the times Donald Trump said he supports law and order. How come they didn't play those clips were over and over and over again? He supports law and order. Of course, Biden didn't and doesn't. And then this question. Why would Donald Trump wait? To lead an insurrection on January 6th. Well, Mark, they were.

They were counting the certified election. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. The reason they were there on January six was to peacefully protest. They were waiting for this legitimate process, but they wanted to peacefully protest and they wanted issues to be raised in a constitutional way on the floor of the House and the Senate. If you're going to lead an insurrection, you don't need to wait till January 6th when they're counting elector's. Why not attack on January 5th, why not attack on November 5th?

Why not attack on January one? You're going to lead an insurrection. Why are you waiting to January? Well, to disrupt the no, no, it's an insurrection. It's not intended to disrupt the count. It's intended to take over the government. Right. Mr. Minister, why would you wait until January 6th? Brilliant point.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number 877 three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one Wall Sacco and Vanzetti, a.k.a. Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough.

Between them, their IQ is in negative territory. OK? May I say, and I say this with all due respect, you know, we are attacked all the time. You are attacked all the time, Trump supporters, Reagan supporters, Tea Party activists. Let me let me try it on them. Brezinski and Scarborough, Sacco and Vanzetti. Have a negative IQ, just like their audience does. I mean, you really have to be a stupid person to watch that program, don't you think, Mr.

Producer?

Maybe they're neo-Nazis. You think they're neo-Nazis? You never know, you never know. Well, maybe not neo-Nazis, I mean, the North Korean generals love that show. They get a real laugh out of it. Maybe neo Marxists, I don't know. But here they are on Ms.

Solasta today, demonstrating their very, very anyway, go ahead country, they came because of Trump and everybody knows it. Move on. They say everybody everybody knows they came because of Trump.

There's a report by CNN, of all places. They started to look into the voting patterns in some of these criminals.

Mr. Producer, several of them didn't vote. How do we know they didn't come because of Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski? How do we know Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski and MSNBC didn't incite the nut jobs? How do we know that? How do we know Pelosi did incite them nut jobs? You know what was interesting? It's painful, but when you heard some of the video that the Democrats were playing in the Senate and the attacks on the cops, you heard that, Mr.

Producer. They sounded more like Nancy Pelosi to me, storm troopers and storm troopers and federal law enforcements inciting the violence. I mean, the criminals, the violent criminals that the capital building, I thought they were regurgitating what they heard from Clyburn and Pelosi. And the conga line of morons, misfits, miscreants and malcontents that are dressed up as hosts and journalists on MSNBC and CNN. China, just like the. Go ahead. Oh, I get why these people were there desecrating the people's house, ruining things, hurting people, murdering people, maiming people and using the American flag as a weapon.

They were doing it for Trump and the frustration.

No, they weren't doing it for Trump. Isn't it funny when you actually had neo-Nazis and white supremacists, they don't call them neo-Nazis and white supremacist Mr.. But is it. They were all there for Trump. Trump made them do this, Trump told them to do this, I am telling you. At the fascistic mindset. That has settled in on the elites in this country is shocking. Shocking. Go ahead. It just has to be explained explicitly to Republicans and they turn away, they can't make this math themselves.

Yeah, it's not stupidity. I'm sorry, what is it? Something way worse. This is evil if you can't see what happens.

So Republicans are evil. There's the drama queen. You know, they do a lot of crying. They do a lot of crime. Only certain riots, only certain deaths, only certain types of arson and all the rest caused them to get emotional. Otherwise, it's move on, move on. I don't know anybody who doesn't think that the perpetrators. Should be tracked down and prosecuted. I don't know anybody who thinks that. I don't know anybody who thinks we should give to some bail reform organization and let them out the back door, not on our side, I don't know anybody who thinks that.

I don't know anyone who thinks that. Our problem, Joe and Mika. Is the way that you smear everybody? Everybody, Trump supporters, the Trump mob. And when you do something like this, you demonstrate a totalitarian inclination mindset. That's the problem. I know you don't get it, but that's the problem. And you have no evidence whatsoever. You all know what, that Trump incited anything. I've gone through this now for days. Four days.

Cut, forgo. Lindsey Graham saying, let's move on from cop killers. Marco Rubio yesterday posting a video saying, let's talk about anything else but this. Let's move on. Marco wants us to move on from cop killers, cop killers out on.

Whether cop killers, Mr. Producer. I thought CNN said that their earlier reporting wasn't accurate. They didn't put it that way, but they had a second or subsequent report that said it's not clear how that officer died. We know one officer committed suicide. We don't know why he committed suicide, this certainly no defense. But if you're going to accuse people at cop killers, I would say to Joe Scarborough.

Who's been charged for killing cops on Capitol Hill? So far, nobody. In that CNN article said that they really can't make a case because they. They don't feel at this time that that officer died from being hit on the head with a fire extinguisher. They're not sure how he died, but that wasn't. That wasn't the cause, according to CNN. So who are the cop killers? So here we have Donald Trump spends months talking about law and order, he's endorsed by various police organizations, and now you see Donald Trump is in charge of cop killers.

This shows you. How truly stupid Joe Scarborough is. How truly pathetic he is, and I might add Comcast for running such a such a disgusting program. But he's not the only one the media think they have this all figured out, the media, which in my view has incited violence. And hatred and division and is still doing it, still doing it. In fact, it is celebrated violence depending on who you are and what you're doing. So Don Lemon plays the Democrat video and then this cut five go blue lives matter, huh?

Law and order. Law and order.

Don't you despise this clown? So all of us who support police officer and I have my entire life, there have been members of my family that worked for the Philadelphia Police Department. Now you're all hypocrites, you're all hypocrites because of what those criminals did at the Capitol, then you're all to blame, you're all guilty.

This again, this fascistic totalitarian mindset. This is where they are.

They hate you anyway. They hate you anyway. Now, all of a sudden, they love cops. Now, this is CNN, which is owned by AT&T. Mark, what can we do? I just told you, they're owned by AT&T and the other one's owned by Comcast, you know what you can do? You can tell them to shove it and stop paying them. Why do you think I didn't watch the Super Bowl? Why do you think I'm not going to watch the Dallas Mavericks?

And that slob and his team. Go ahead. Eggs respect law enforcement, why don't you just we do us and we still do, and we want the people who attacked that line, that blue line, to be prosecuted, and we want Black Lives Matter when they attack the cops to be prosecuted and we want antifa when they attack the cops to be prosecuted. Got it, dummy. It's called consistency. It's called morality. You jerk. Go ahead.

Don't you dare even shut up, you idiot, lecture us. Lectured from the from the bowels of CNN and MSNBC in the rest. Then there's this Jamie Raskin, does anybody remember Jamie Raskin leading the charge against the violence that took place in our city's. He's the leader of the House Democrats and the impeachment. Has anybody asked Jamie Raskin what Nancy Pelosi knew and when she knew it from her sergeant of arms? He's not interested in finding out why is that?

The chief of the Capitol Police says, I told the sergeant at Arms, I told him, we're going to need the National Guard. It's getting big out there. He says it went nowhere. Then he goes to the other sergeant arms at the recommendation of Pelosi Sergeant arms over on the McConnell side. That guy doesn't do anything. Jamie Raskin, want to know about it? No, he don't want to know a damn thing. What happened to the video, all the video of the president, the United States saying he supports law enforcement over and over and over again, backing law enforcement, law enforcement, backing the president.

Where was that video in the Senate today? Oh. It disappeared like 18 seconds of the Nixon tapes. Let's call it, what are you talking about? We don't know what you mean. Then this clown from Rhode Island with his cornrow on his forehead, what's his name, Cesa Aloni or something or other. I love these guys, but the cornrows on their forehead, you know, did it, Schumer did it. Now, caecilians or whatever the hell his name is, he's a sleazeball extraordinaire.

Sleazeball. Going on and on. What is he complaining about? Listen, this started a long time ago. Long time ago, you can't you can't just look at the speech on January said this was gone on for days. President was mobilized. You heard Liz Cheney mobilizing. They were getting ready, they were getting ready for an insurrection. The president said steal the vote and he's going on about fraud and all kinds of things that took place. Play the tape.

And then he played the tape, play the video, play the video, OK, play the tape in the video of you and your colleagues going on and on about the postal system. Remember that mailboxes were in the middle of the night, were being removed. Remember that, Mr. Producer? Mailbox is being removed from minority neighborhoods and Democrat neighborhoods and. Not enough precincts in Democratic neighborhoods, particularly black neighborhoods, and LeBron James, he was very angry about this, even though the local officials in Atlanta and elsewhere decide where the precincts are, not that matter.

White privilege trumped privilege, white supremacy. So they were laying the foundation to delegitimize this election as they laid the foundation to delegitimize the 2016 election.

And wow, you never heard a word about the post office after the riots didn't occur?

Nothing. What happen? We know what happened. The narcissists who were behind all this crap spoke the time we read it to you on the air because they can't keep a secret. They're so excited about what they did. So this guy is Fiscalini from Rhode Island. Does he play any of that? Of course not. Well, whatever happened to exculpatory information? Is that the prosecution? No.

You don't understand, Mark. This isn't a criminal trial. No, I know that it's not a civil trial. No, I got that. What the hell is it? What is this? What is this? I'll tell you what it is, this gives a kangaroo court a bad name. Representative Jamie Raskin, who objected. In the recent past to the certification of electors for Donald Trump. Cut six go. Trials or public events in a democracy and no trials more public or significant than an impeachment trial because the insurrection brought shocking violence, bloodshed and pain in the nation's capital.

And we will be showing relevant clips of the mobs attack on police officers and other innocent people. We do urge parents and teachers to exercise close review of what young people are watching here.

OK, thanks. We've all seen it was all in the news. And so this is a slick production. To show us film of the attack on the Capitol building. What does that have to do with any of this? You're trying an individual human being. Without any rules of evidence, without any rules at all, you're introducing stuff that would never be allowed in a courtroom because it's. It's all hype, it's all. It's all aimed at emotion, not that the violence is hype.

But that it has nothing to do. With the individual you're trying to destroy. Let me prove it to you. Washington Post, New York Times, Jamie Raskin and all the rest. Tomorrow, will you present the American people with a text, with the email, the phone call? With a public statement that actually. Shows Donald Trump conspiring with any of these groups or any of these individuals for the purpose of creating incitement, would you please show it to us?

Stop projecting, stop giving us your opinions, stop emoting, stop with your own psychological obsessions. I've asked you a question, a legitimate question. Just one sentence. One sentence, that's all. You don't have any. Love anything. It's innuendo, it's the worst kind of crap that you can do to another human being. The whole thing is a sham, the existence of this trial is a sham, the impeachment was a sham. Why do you think they rushed it through?

Why do you think they're conducting a trial this way? Why do you think they're doing all the things you need to do to make sure the actual evidence is never presented? I'll be right back. Much love in. Over 2000 of you, my listeners, made the switch from overpriced wireless carriers to pure talk over the past few months. We want the rest of you to join us and to see what we're talking about. If you're with AT&T and Verizon or T-Mobile, your family could save over 800 dollars a year just by switching to pure talk.

You get great coverage. You can keep your phone and your number and you'll save a fortune. Talk is the top rated wireless company by Consumer Affairs with the absolute best consumer service team based right here in America. Does that sound good? Well, it gets better right now. Get unlimited talk, text and six gigs of data, just thirty dollars a month. And if you go over on data, they don't charge you for it. They don't care.

Go to Pure Talk USA Dotcom and in a promo code Lhevinne podcast again pure talk USA Dot com promo code Lytvyn Levien podcast. And when you do, you'll say 50 percent off your first month. That's pure talk. USA Dotcom Promo Code Lhevinne podcast. Pure Talk USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

You know, basically this this despicable show in the Senate.

It's very repetitive, one after another, they get up and make the same allegation, same allegation, same allegation, it's like a lawyer making a closing argument without evidence.

In which case, the lawyer can't make a closing argument without evidence. I just hope the Republican senators are smart enough to figure this out, some of them, unfortunately, are quite stupid and some of them, unfortunately, are over the top. You look at Ben Sasse. You look at Mitt Romney, you look at this guy from Louisiana, not Kennedy, the other guy. Cassidy Well, you know, I was convinced the other guys just made a better argument, let me tell you something, Cassidy, and that's not where your vote is to be based on.

And let me tell you something, the colonel. Ah, everybody's got their own conscience. Did you see that leak in Politico, Mr. Blitzer? McConnell said he's told his members to go ahead and vote their own conscience, like in the past, they haven't voted their own conscience. That's not your job either to vote your own conscience. Your job as a juror is to listen to the facts, to discern what the facts actually are, and if you're handed a a pot full of crap, you don't call it Cheerios.

It's to discern the truth. From falsity. And then apply it to the law in this case, the Constitution, now, number one, 44 Republicans voted that this is unconstitutional. So what should they be doing now, Mr. Producer? They should be sitting there basically eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches because no matter what is said. And what is being said is B.S., but no matter what is said, it doesn't matter. You're sitting on an unconstitutional jury.

The Senate does not have jurisdiction, I don't care what the British parliament said in seventeen, twenty five, and neither did the framers very much care about what they said either.

I'll be right back. It's a new American Revolution that starts here to Mark Levin show, call it at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one bill in New Jersey must be south part of New Jersey, the great Philadelphia station.

How are you? Yes, Mark, how are you doing? Thanks. OK. Well, yeah, you're from you're from South Philly. Where are you from?

Well, no, born south of Camden County.

But I can tell you were born in South Philly howzat. I can tell you. I can tell you. Go ahead. Sure.

Already. Yeah. So my main concern is how would the sham trial that they're doing, the Democrats, how can they possibly can continue it without nobody just stopping them? And why do the Republicans get together and just boycott out, say this is over, you can't do it. You have no evidence?

Well, first of all, they can't stop them. I mean, who's going to stop them? They're in the majority. In terms of boycotting, I'm of two minds on that, first of all, to actually think all the Republicans would walk out, that's the problem with the Republicans. The Republicans are like the Vichy French, do you understand what I mean? They run in every direction. The Democrats, you know. They're like good Germans, they line up and they won't be moved.

So here we are. So your idea may be fine, but it ain't going to happen. And. And I'm not sure it should happen, what should happen is. In the course, at the end, in the course of this act. Well, you know what, sir? You make a good point. I would walk out of there. I put out a statement, I'd say, why it's unconstitutional, why this is a sham. I've sat here and I listen to enough and I and I'm leaving.

I don't want to be a juror to this sham. You know, I agree with you. While you said they should walk in a mass, they're not going to do that. Well paid, but they can't just continue and continue letting it go by. Well, they aren't going to let it continue, continue and let it go by. To give any indication otherwise. I see what's going on here and I see what they're trying to do to America, and they're not true Americans because of their justification of what they're trying to do.

You know, there was a piece in Politico, I think it was last night or this morning, sir. Where Mitch McConnell is telling people, vote your conscience and he's not sure how he's going to vote. That's the Republican leader, the longest serving Republican leader in the Senate, you believe this? Who in the future, what do you think's going to happen if they get to take over everything and let anybody in, they have taken over everything, just.

Joe Biden is now on 53 executive orders and executive actions, we've never seen anything like this in American history. Because they know what he's signing. Yeah, he knows what he's signing. All right, sir, thank you for your call. Very edifying. We have another caller, Mr. Producer. Yeah, and where? WIBC Joe in Massachusetts, how are you, sir? Oh, good evening, Mark, great to talk to you.

Couple of things, by the way. You know what's fascinating about this show? I mean, seriously. Here, a guy could tell he was born in South Philly, I can tell you from Massachusetts, very cool. Next, we'll get a caller from South Carolina. Something's big damn show. Go ahead. I'm sorry. That's OK. I grew up in Boston. Anyway, Mark, as this trial goes on and the fifty three executive orders, the the Democratic Party in the RINO Republican Party are going to shrink and shrink and shrink.

And the Trump Republican Pro America Party is going to grow and grow in the tent. That is going to get bigger and bigger. Well, at what party is that? The Republican Party, the RINO, so you're saying the the the the Trump part of the Republican Party will grow while the McConnell part will shrink shrink, they'll go the way of the Green Party.

But I'm not sure that and here's why. They seem to control the money sources. They seem to they seem to weasel into the powerful positions in Washington, D.C..

You know, we've had as I explained the other day, we've had a number of runs against the Republican establishment, whether it was Goldwater later Reagan who was enormously successful.

But then they wind up with Bush, the Tea Party in 2010, which they used to get the majority in the House, and a significant pick up in the Senate and then turned on and try and crushed. Then they rode Trump's coattails into near majority status in the House and the Senate, where we expected to lose a number of more seats and look at them.

They survive like cockroaches, like cockroaches after nuclear war. There they are, there's the cockroaches, they're still there.

I understand, but. OK. Seventy four million voted for Trump next time around.

Whether it's that they weren't all just Trump, some of them were, you know, establishment Republicans who wanted to defeat the Democrats to. But we're going to 95 million in that problem, we've got trumpery problem. I don't think we'll have 95 million. I don't know where those votes are coming from. And I by the way, why are you still in Massachusetts? That were born and raised. Yeah, I was born and raised in Philly. I'm not there.

Well, I live in Quincy, Quincy, a very nice city, you know, home of the Adams, the Hancox and yeah, I know we all have to reach back that far when we come out of these cities, New York, Hamilton, Philadelphia, Franklin and so forth, Boston, so many great men, but not anymore.

Yeah, yeah. But the summer we got Cape Cod, you know, here Cape Cod at the end of the great whites down in Chatham, like.

Yeah, those great whites. Boy, I tell you what, those surfers out there are about as stupid as they come. They're chummed, don't they know it. The great whites off of Cape Cod, that's unbelievable when I see those pictures, I go, holy mackerel, I'm never going in the ocean again.

Fascinating creatures. Yeah, I know, I'm going to say something that's going to get me in trouble, but the fewer them, the better. Just saying what I know, I know, but when you have more great whites and less Democrat.

Oh yeah, yeah, absolutely. Now you just said that. So you'd be called a white supremacist. Do you understand that?

No. All right, my friend, you got a good sense of humor.

I appreciate it. But he makes a good point. You know, this is your home, why the hell should you have to leave it? And yet many do because it's just intolerable, the taxes, the crime, the schools. It's amazing you don't see people in red states trying to escape the blue states, do you, America? You don't see people in the suburbs trying to escape to the cities, do you? Some of them do and gentrify them.

But on the whole, no. Maybe one day somebody will write a book about that. Why is it that when people can get up and move, and I'm talking about white minorities, women, what do they move to red states and red areas? They don't flee to New York City. They don't flee to Minneapolis, they're not fleeing to California unless they're fleeing from south of the border. But seriously. That's why they want to nationalize all this stuff, so you know where to go, he go to Florida, won't matter.

You go to Tennessee, you won't matter. You go to South Dakota, won't matter. This is the minimum wage, this is the health care system, this is our immigration policy, this is what we're doing in our schools. Whether you like it or not, and people who are in the cities, particularly minorities who who want to go to the suburbs because the suburbs are more diverse than they've ever been, they're very diverse.

Most. Suburban areas, the inner suburban areas outside the cities are over 40 percent diverse. Over 40 percent minority. They're more diverse than the cities, they're more diverse than the outer suburbs. So what are the Democrats want to do, gobble up, gobble them up? Why so people have nowhere to go, so mobility doesn't matter then, no matter what your state is. It just doesn't matter. We're going to make it all California. We're going to make it all New York.

We're going to make it all New Jersey. And we're going to impose our will, that's the way it is. As soon as that, I'll give you an example, my state of Virginia. The Democrats have a nothing majority in the Senate, I think it's like a one vote majority in our Senate, Mr. Producer. And they have like a four or five vote majority in the assembly, so they just got in and it's minuscule. They're rammed through every radical abortion law they can, every radical gun law they can.

They're about to make capital punishment in Virginia illegal. One of the reasons I moved to Virginia is because I wanted nothing to do with Maryland or the District of Columbia. They didn't have an excuse me, they didn't have a death penalty or anything like Virginia's becoming them. Why? Because the Democrats come in. They have a blueprint. And they go right down the list and they want to turn every one of these purple states hardcore blue. And they put in exactly the same kind of policies that don't work, that destroy people's lives, destroy economies, destroy neighborhoods, they do exactly the same thing.

Even with tiny majorities for just a year or two, and they want to make sure they have massive majorities for the rest of time, you know, California is a perfect example. We had Republican governor after Republican governor in California had Republican legislatures in California. George H.W. Bush won the electoral vote, won the popular vote in California, you believe that 1989. Thirty short years ago. The Democrats got in. And they did everything they could, like the Democrats are trying to do on the national scene now, this is what Pelosi knows.

This is what Harris knows, this is what they know. To change the way we govern, to change the levers of power, to change the institutions. To flip the state. Now, some of you were too young to know this, but in 1988. The last year, the Reagan second term is presidency. There were stories coming out saying, will the Democrats ever win the presidency again? Now, why were they writing that? Because the Republicans had a lock on California, they had a lock on Texas, they had a lock on Florida.

They had a lock on Ohio. And of course, the southern states were not even a debate. North Carolina Republican, Georgia Republican, Virginia Republican, what else? Colorado Republican. Arizona Republican. And they went on and on these articles and they said that Democrats will never win the presidency, not in our lifetimes. So what did the Democrats do? They said, oh, yes, we will.

What did they do? What do they do this last election? You're not allowed to talk about they change the election laws in key states. Some of you are focused on the machines, stop with the machines, focus on what they've done because they're doing it again. It worked in California. They're actually doing it right now in Texas, although they aren't, we have a Republican governor, Mark. Through immigration. Why do you think and I talked about this last week, why do you think Joe Biden wants open immigration?

He doesn't want to deport people. If the new immigrants who eventually become citizens were voting three fourths Republicans, do you think they'd want open borders? They'd be building walls so fast, your head would spin. Your head would spin. So through immigration, they change the population, they change the voting, the nature of the voters, that is the vote, more Democratic and Republican, they change the election laws. Why is that so there? So people who now are forbidden from voting or have to show some proof and so forth, they'll vote anyway.

They're never putting in place systems, whether it's immigration, whether it's voting and down the line. They're going to be that are going to provide for more oversight. They don't do that. They do the opposite. So they're close to flipping Texas, and when that happens, it's over, but it wasn't that long ago, it was 30 years ago when there were articles out there 30, 27, 28 years ago.

The republic, well, the Democrats ever take the presidency again and they decided we're going to change the country, we're going to change the citizenry, we're going to change the voting systems, we're going to change everything we can to empower us to make us permanent and to flip these states. And that's exactly what they're doing. I'll be right back.

My globin. Over 2000 of you, my listeners, made the switch from overpriced wireless carriers to pure talk over the past few months, we want the rest of you to join us and to see what we're talking about. If you're with AT&T and Verizon or T-Mobile, your family could save over 800 dollars a year just by switching to pure talk. You get great coverage. You can keep your phone and your number and you'll save a fortune. Talk is the top rated wireless company by Consumer Affairs with the absolute best consumer service team based right here in America.

Does that sound good? Well, it gets better right now. Get unlimited talk, text and six gigs of data, just thirty dollars a month. And if you go over on data, they don't charge you for it. They don't care. Go to Pure Talk USA Dotcom and in a promo code Lytvyn podcast again, pure talk USA dot com promo code, Lhevinne Levien podcast. And when you do, you'll say 50 percent off your first month.

That's pure talk. USA Dotcom Promo Code Lhevinne podcast Pure Talk USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

I have to figure out how to imitate Hanadi. So I can make him, if you know what I mean, he's so. Proud of his imitation of me. It's not hard to imitate me, Mr. Producer. All you have to do is do a nasal amitay, right? Hey, how are you, man? That's that's his imitation. That's why he thinks he's rich little. But he's not. So I got to watch his show carefully and pick up on his little antics, his little Tourette's things and so forth, and then and then do a short performance of my Hanadi imitation.

I got to figure out what that is. I have to figure out what it is I'll be on a show tonight, nine thirty PM Eastern Time, but I'll be watching very carefully before it's my turn, taking notes to say, OK, does this and he does that and I have to do this. I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens.

Now over two million conservative members Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Armacost U.S. Join.

He's here. He's here now broadcasting from the underground command post here, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one well. While they're focusing on Donald Trump on Capitol Hill, it's very difficult to focus on.

But Joe Biden is doing, isn't it? But let's look at what Joe Biden isn't doing and you parents out there and want your kids to go to school, you need to understand that you're going to get no help from Joe Biden. Joe Biden is bought and paid for by the communist Chinese, and he's bought and paid for by the communist teachers union. Jen Psaki at the White House briefing today. Cut 13 go. I could just follow up with you on comments he made yesterday about school reopening.

You said the goal was for more than 50 percent of schools to have some teacher in person at least one day.

Now, it's not 50 percent of the schools to have some teaching in person at least one day a week now.

That's not a goal, that's surrender, and that's exactly what they were told by the teachers unions, that that is what they would tolerate. So that's Joe Biden's position. So I had hoped it would be higher, but why is the administration setting the bar at one day? Why not go higher?

Well, certainly we are not planning to celebrate at 100 days if we reach that goal. That is our own effort to make our own set, our own markings bold and certain and bold and ambitious agenda for how wow.

A bold and ambitious agenda. Now they want to give the unions a quarter of a trillion dollars on top of over 60. DeCordova. Yeah, a top of over 60 billion. And for that, you're going to get a bold and ambitious agenda. Hopefully in three and a half months, your kids can go to school one day a week. You parents getting sick and tired of Joe Binya. Go ahead ourselves and progress, but we certainly hope to build from that even at 100 days and from there our objective, the president's objectives, is for all schools to reopen, to stay open, to be open five days a week, for kids to be learning.

That's what our focus is on. This is simply a goal for 100 days.

A lot of schools already doing that. And for working parents, one day a week doesn't help.

Now you see the trick. They did this with the vaccines to. We're going to do a million million one a day. We already are. Why are you such a wet blanket that that's why we're going to do. That's our plan. Now, your plans are already in place, right? The. I don't know who Welker works for. Maybe we can find out, but I'm really shocked that she's actually asking some questions and good for her. Who is she?

Big lip, do we know who she works for? Russia TV or something like that. But she must have kids who aren't in school, I don't know, I have no idea. But that said, what is it about NBC? No question little. But that said. This isn't a goal, ladies and gentlemen, almost every school district in the nation is doing this and more. But parents are saying is send our kids back to school full time teachers, you're not paid part time, you're paid full time.

Not to sit in front of a computer, but to sit in a classroom, just pretend the classroom is Wal-Mart or in the classroom is your local supermarket, a grocery store, you know, places you like to go. Follow the science. Joe Biden is not going to follow the signs here, folks. He's going to follow the money. He's power hungry. Time. Politician, that's what he is. All this talk about following the science when it comes to our kids, they have no intention of following the science.

No intention whatsoever. Really quite amazing, don't you think? Now, what about the national anthem? You know, I remember a time wasn't that long ago when the national anthem wasn't all that controversial. But now a critical race theory and then all the rest is very, very controversial, you know. So Psaki at the briefing again, hat tip Rumball, here's Peter Doocy. Cut 15 go.

What does President Biden think about the Dallas Mavericks owner? Mark Cuban decided to indefinitely stop playing the national anthem before his National Basketball Association game.

Well, I haven't spoken with the president about the decision by Mark Cuban on the Dallas Mavericks or the, I should say, the national anthem. But I know he's incredibly proud to be an American and has great respect for the anthem and all that it represents, especially for our men and women serving in uniform around the world.

He'd also say that, of course, you ever heard the press secretary say, I haven't talked to the president, but he would also say, Mr. Producer. So what's going on here? What does she put her hand behind his head and just move it every time she speaks or something? I haven't spoken to him, but I know he'd also say, of course, go ahead.

Pride in our country means recognizing moments where we as a country haven't lived up to our highest ideals, which is about recognizing moments where we have.

Which are many. How about recognizing mom? Something about this Democrat Party that is so evil and diabolical. So evil and diabolical. That this country hasn't lived up to its highest ideals. It's a nation with high ideals, most nations don't even have high ideals. And so they take the lowest common denominator as they put together their base. And now you know why I call them America haters, because that's what they are. Who thinks this way? She uses the opportunity when she's asked about Mark Cuban in the national anthem to say America hasn't always lived up to its highest ideals.

America has lived up to many of its highest ideals on many occasions. And people have sacrificed their lives to do exactly that now, not Psaki. No, no, no, no, she's a spoiled brat, just like all these other leftists in the White House and on Capitol Hill and in the media. They haven't sacrificed a damn thing. Go ahead. And at times when people are speaking to when they take action at sporting events, it means respecting the right of people granted to excuse me, excuse me, Rambla, the question was about the national anthem if it shouldn't be played.

At the national basketball games and the and the league stepped in and ordered him to do it. But look how she uses his opportunity to rant against her own country. To rant against our own country and the union and yeah, and sometimes we haven't and we haven't done this and, you know, and we and we don't do this and we and we haven't done that.

Unbelievable. But I'll never leave it. They'll never leave it. Ned Siegel is the chief financial officer of Twitter. Mr. Producer, you want to see if Ned Siegel wants to come on the program? The guy with the beard, he'll never come on. What the hell is his name? Jack. If you're going to have a beard, at least do something with it, I mean, the guy looks, he looks, he looks creepy, does he not?

He looks creepy. It looks like a throwback to the third century or something. You look at this guy, you say this guy is worth fifty billion dollars. Maybe five bang my head against the wall enough, I could be like him and I can be worth 50 billion, you know. But let's go to Ned. Let's hear what Ned has to say when asked about the President Trump, will he be banned forever? Cat 17 go.

One more question for you. President Trump was banned. Former President Trump, who is who is this? The CNN idiot over the CNBC idiot. Go ahead. Ran for office again and was elected president, would you allow him back on the platform?

So the way our policies work when everyone like a guy who always starts sentences with the words so so, you know, I remember 10 years ago the word to start was, look, you know, look so, you know, so, you know. So go ahead.

I'm a year removed from the platform, whether you're a commentator or a CFO or you are a former or current public official. And so our policies are designed to make sure that people are not inciting violence.

Whether or not you have a lot of people on your site that incite violence, including heads of state that are genocidal maniacs. Including your own company. Your own company. Go ahead. He does that we have to remove him from the service and our policies to allow people to come back. So, no, he was removed when he was president and that there'd be no there be no difference for anybody who's a public official.

Tell me, Jack Ass, when Biden went on and on talking about attacking the president of the United States, physically attacking the president of the United States, he didn't ban him, did you? Did you bear Maxine Waters? Did you bang Chuck Schumer when he threatened members of the Supreme Court, did you? And we can go down a long list, you're fraud, fake, phony. I'll be right back. Much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk.

AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us.

We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead a c us.

Mr. Producer is going to quickly soon as he gets it. Send me a. Copy this New York Times article that I just saw. Ready for this? It's written by. Michael Grine Greenbaum, Tiffany Shoe, Katie Robertson and Keith Collins, four of them. If a picture of Rush, Mangino, me and Beck. How right wing radio stoked anger before the Capitol siege. Keep in mind, this is a newspaper. That promoted Fidel Castro. This is a newspaper that promoted Joseph Stalin and this is a newspaper that covered up for Adolf Hitler.

Who are they calling right wing? Show hosts shows hosted by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and other talk radio stars promoted debunk claims of a stolen election and urged listeners to fight back. See how this works. See how this works. Two days before a mob of Trump supporters invaded the United States capital, upending the nation's peaceful transition of power and leaving at least five people dead folks. Some people attended that event and had heart attacks and died and other maladies and died, five people weren't killed.

The one person that was killed was one of the people who broke into the Capitol building. So here we go. Peaceful and leaving at least five people dead. The right wing radio star, Glenn Beck, delivered a message to his flock of ten point five million listeners. It's time to fight. This is sick. It's time to rip and claw and rake, Mr. Beck said on his January four broadcast. It's time to go to war as the left went to war four years ago.

Notice, he said, as the left went to war four years ago. Nothing in here at all about violence. A former Fox News host, Mr. Beck had speculated for weeks about baseless claims of voter fraud in the presidential race. I don't know that he mentioned Russia collusion. I don't think so. He told listeners that Donald Trump had taught conservatives that you don't have to cower anymore. You don't have to back down when ridiculed into oblivion. You can fight back.

Now, what is wrong with what he said, Rich? Not a word. Democrats not only say this, they say with Molotov cocktails. Mr. Beck did not lobby for his listeners to invade the Capitol. Oh, OK. And a day later, he urged marchers in Washington to really kind of channel your inner Martin Luther King, adding that violence is just not who we've ever been. But the language he used on his January four show was typical of the aggressive rhetoric that permeated conservative talk radio in the weeks before the Washington siege.

Suspect didn't do anything. He didn't do anything. No, I think I have the full article here. Oh, here it is. Just bear with me. If the dissect these things. Talk radio is perhaps the most influential. And under chronicled part of right wing media. See what we can to destroy this entity, we don't chronicle it enough.

Were the voices of Mr. Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and other star hosts wifed through the homes. Workplaces, commutes of tens of millions of listeners before the riot, the shows are often unrestrained forms for claims of rig voting machines and a liberal conspiracy to steal the presidency for Joseph R.. Biden, Jr., Mark Levin, who reaches an estimated 11 million listeners. That's a lie, 14 million at least set in a Christmas broadcast. Christmas, what does that?

December 25th. Wouldn't that be a rerun, Mr. Producer? That would be a best off, so it was probably said weeks before. Called his listeners to crush them, crush them, we need to kick their ass. Doc Cunningham, a syndicated host in Cincinnati, told his listeners on January four, I will never surrender and collapse and act as if it's OK when hundreds of thousands have voted illegally.

Wow, what a call to arms there, Bill, on January 5th as Trump supporters started to converge on Washington. Listen to this. They're converging on Washington.

Dan Bongino, the host of a popular podcast, nationally syndicated show, said the Democrats rigged the rules to make sure that any potential outcome would go their way.

Did they just brag about that in time, Mr. Producer? They just bragged about that. Well, no matter how bad The New York Times. Mr. Bond took pains to tell his audience they should ignore his use of the phrase vice president elect Kamala Harris, I'm conceding nothing, he said, blaming the gaffe on a network teleprompter.

Have you heard anything in here yet which anything? Not a word. You're right, it's click bait, that clarification hinted at the often unguarded nature of talk radio. Oh, that's why he said it. We're a whole host, indulgent, edgier fare than on TV networks like Fox News. The New York Times is such a sleazy piece of s it's just unbelievable they had to get four morons to write this piece. The New York Times with Anonymous, The New York Times with its anti-Semitic cartoons, the New York Times with its work culture.

That Barry Weiss resigned and told us all about what goes on at The New York Times, I wrote a whole chapter on The New York Times where they put an unconscionable, diabolical newspaper. It's been throughout modern history, but here they are.

You knew they were coming. And, of course, The New York Times never incites any violence. The result is something of an ID of American conservative thought House intemperate remarks on race, immigration and other subjects. Lenna shows a renegade feeling keep listeners loyal and and emotionally invested.

Where does that come from? It's like your friend in the bar said Lewis Freeland, they always bring these goofballs in free studies, talk real politics at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Is that like the University of Moscow? I mean, it's like the most radical kook college there is, he's your buddy, he's kind of like you and likes the same kind of people that you like and doesn't like the same kind of people you don't like.

This guy doesn't know me. He doesn't know Rush. He doesn't know Sean. He doesn't know Bongino. He doesn't know Beck. He doesn't know anybody.

Unbelievable. We're ready to take you on New York Times, we're ready to duke it out with you. We'll duke it out with you on free speech. Obviously, we can't do it on big tech, but we'll duke it out with you even if we have to duke it out with you in courtrooms. We're ready. I'll be right back. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk.

AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. EMAC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us.

We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c U.S..

Mark Levin, tough as hell. That's why I like Mark Levin and I'm not sure a lot of people like him. He's tough as hell, but I like him.

I love call No. Eight seven seven thirty eight one three eight one one.

See, The New York Times wants to separate people like me from our support of Donald Trump and our friendship that Donald Trump. But we're not going to do that. I'm not going to do that. When The New York Times. Right. A full blown apology, not an excuse like it did several decades ago, but a full blown apology. For its aid and comfort for the Third Reich and Hitler in covering up the Holocaust until 1944. When The New York Times gives back the Pulitzer, the Walter Durante received in 1932 for being the Moscow correspondent for 12 years for The New York Times and effectively for Stalin since he was on Stalin's payroll.

And role lie after lie after lie while Ukrainians were being slaughtered, when The New York Times has a full throated apology for that. The New York Times says a full throated apology for their guy who went to Cuba and fell in love with a great Democratic revolutionary, Castro, in 1957. Lied to the American people. Created a kind of hero out of Castro, supported by The New York Times. That's three genocidal murders with a New York Times has a full throated apology for what it did there.

They maybe will read The New York Times. And so it's the same New York Times that's pushing out the 16 19 project. Having embraced in either advanced or censored. Genocide throughout the last century. The New York Times now seeks to take down our country with a radical kook 16 19 project, which is factually wrong, say every reliable historian, regardless of their politics or party. When The New York Times anti-Semitism against the state of Israel and its support for violence against Israel when it comes to Hamas, when they put a full throated apology for that, maybe we'll read The New York Times.

When The New York Times prints news articles and editorials defending free speech. Which it has failed to do. More than one. Nebulous e-mail questioning Joe Biden and his imperial activities, defending the courts from Chuck Schumer when The New York Times. Is anything but. An unconscionable evil corporate entity, then maybe will care what The New York Times says.

Me, New York Times, how many times did you use the phrase? Russia collusion. How many times? How many times did you publish people who claim that the 2016 election was illegitimate? How many stories did you run that were sourced? To Obama administration officials who are violating the law in order to try and get Donald Trump, including putting spies in his campaign and lying to the FISA court. How many? How many stories you're going to run The New York Times on the use of the word Nazi neo-Nazi?

To describe the president of the United States and his supporters on the Joe Scarborough show. Or Deliman afraid of Cuomo. How many of those stories are you going to run? Inciting violence and Tifa Black Lives Matter. How many of those stories did you run? You're a disgusting corporation who hires disgusting people who lie day in and day out to the American people to advance your phony agenda and ideology.

There's not a single conservative talk show host, Rush Sean Bongino back or me who has ever, ever. Promoted violence, the same cannot be said for your crap newspaper. The same cannot be said for your crap party. Period. Which is why, despite four reporters and weeks and weeks of investigation, you couldn't find a single sentence where any of us did. And yet you have a million dollars worth of reporters there looking, looking, looking. Of course, they're not going to look at Hunter Biden.

They're not going to look at the Biden family. They're not going to look at communist China. They have four reporters. Trying to figure out if five of us ever said anything. That would incite anyone, but they couldn't. So they have to, you know, they have to play that game at Raschein Place while he said crush them, crush them, crush them. He must have meant get armed, get violent and attack the cops and attack the Capitol.

That's what he must have meant. Now, that's not what he said and that's not what he meant. It's not going to work. We are not cowards, we do not buckle to you. We will take you on. We have much larger audiences than The New York Times does. Each of us individually. And collectively. It's not going to happen. And if it's not on terrestrial radio, it'll be on podcast's. It doesn't matter. You can't do to us what she did to parler, you can't do to us what did you did the former president of the United States.

It's not going to happen regardless of what these broadcast companies may or may not do. Period. And so the fascistic New York Times is at it again. Just as the fascistic Washington Post is at it, again, there's not a dime's worth of difference between these newspapers.

Why is that? Because they have an agenda. Notice they never report on each other, Mr. Producer, you know, cable channels will fight with each other, radio hosts will fight with each other. Have you ever seen The New York Times and Washington Post fight with each other? Never. They would never do that. They're never going to do that. They're not competitors. They're sisters, brothers. I like to say that I don't know what to say otherwise I'm not up on the latest lingo.

They're also lying bastards. They have no intention of being journalists. They think they're clever, they're not clever. Not in the least. They're busy purifying, purifying their own ranks, by the way, they're still at it. They're still at it. It's like SOS Burgers, Mao, they're still going through it. Blowing people out. Mothership has to be protected. There's no reason. A corporation, an extraordinarily wealthy corporation. Like The New York Times, that has enormous influence.

Should be protected from libel laws. That's a relatively recent event from the Supreme, but there's no reason. That it should be. Unless they're afraid of being sued for lying and assassinating people's characters now, they wouldn't do that, would they, ladies?

Of course not. Just to show you where The New York Times is. Remember that anonymous op ed that they ran, ladies and gentlemen? Remember that. From some nobody at the Department of HHS. Homeland Security. Some mid to low level political point, everybody was looking at the White House, who must this be? This must be a serious big it's a nobody. A lightweight. And they ran it anyway. Because they're liars. They pushed the Russia collusion story, lied to their readership, that's OK.

They have an agenda. They have an agenda. To talk radio, oh, man, I guarantee they were looking at social media, Mr. Producer, they were looking on websites, they were less than they were, and I bet they even found exculpatory stuff, you know?

Exculpatory, you know what that means? Stuff that cuts against their article, I guarantee they found, but they couldn't use that, now they have a narrative. They got to push the narrative. And so now we are right wingers. Every one of the people mentioned in that Article five great hosts, I don't know Alex Jones, he's mentioned there, but five of us who don't know Alex Jones, all five of us that I do know.

Our libertarian to conservative. Believe in law and order. Embrace our faith. Believe in the founding. Utterly and completely reject violence and rioters, regardless of who's doing it, unlike the left in The New York Times and The Washington Post. All of us. And so they use this canard or they use right wingers, they use it to describe the Cowboys, neo-Nazis, Klansmen and talk radio, you see, this is how the game works. The Big Lie, right.

To quote Joe Biden and Goebbels. Near times, you can quote Coble's you covered for Goebbels and Hitler. It's the big lie where right wingers so if you support the Constitution. If you believe what was done, I do and for the states violated the Constitution, we've discussed it till I'm blue in the face. Then you must be a right winger who believes in violence and in his heart of hearts supports what happened on Capitol Hill. How do I know?

Because The New York Times believes it. Therefore, reporters think it. Therefore, it must be true. How many people tonight? Precious human being. In gulags. In the old Russian Soviet Union, all those slaughtered Ukrainians. In death camps throughout Europe. Executed. In Castro's Cuba. How many of them are screaming silently? From their graves, if they should be so lucky to have a great. At The New York Times. Here's what I want those for phony reporters of The New York Times to know.

Nobody with integrity. Nobody with integrity. Good work for The New York Times, nobody. Nobody who has an ounce of humanity or compassion can work for The New York Times. Nobody who has an ounce of professionalism could work for The New York Times. And I can go to bed at night every night knowing. That I don't have the history of The New York Times. Quite the opposite. I reject tyranny in every form. Including those efforts to take over our media.

We'll be right back. Much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. EMAC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead a a US.

And of course, media folks are pulling up all the cases where Jamie Raskin used the word fight, where Joe Biden used the word fight and. Of course, to the left, that doesn't matter, and they're trying to set somebody up, they're trying to push a narrative, they're trying to destroy millions of people, this is what they do. They're perfectly comfortable with it. Like I said, The New York Times had no qualms about Stalin slaughtering millions of Ukrainians.

The New York Times had no qualms about Hitler slaughtering millions of European Jews. It sat on the information. It covered it up. Oh, they had a few back stories, you know, back with the classified ads and Macy's advertisements. But that's about it. And, of course, the prison state, which is called Cuba. New York Times had no problem with that New York Times help bring it about. And now The New York Times seeks to destroy America with the 16 19 project and a big lie about our own history.

By embracing a racist ideology called critical race theory, it's they who are the kooks, it's they who are the right wingers and left wingers. It's they who incite and promote violence and in fact, celebrate it, that's its history. It's a disreputable rag, that's what it is. The people who work for it. Well. Chip off the old block, I guess, Mr. Producer. I'll be on Hannity tonight. In 30 minutes, nine, 30 p.m.

Eastern time. We'll go through this to the extent I can. What's been taking place on Capitol Hill, it's a it's an embarrassment, it's a humiliation of the Senate. The Senate degrades itself. Absolutely degrades itself. What's occurring there doesn't happen anywhere else that is any other society that embraces Western enlightenment, it does occur in other places, that is regimes that do not embrace Western enlightenment. Or even Judeo-Christian values. What's going on in the United States Senate has never, ever gone on in the United States Senate before.

We have. With a handful of exceptions, the worst Senate. Since I would say the Senate in the 1960s where you had a number of senators pushing segregation. Now, you have a number of senators pushing the evisceration of our constitutional order. Notice I didn't say fight or crush, Mr. Peters, we salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters and emergency personnel. I want to thank all of you great patriots. Keep your chin up. We're not defined by the left.

And I'll see you in 30 minutes on Hannity. Take care. From the Westwood One podcast network.