Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark, the winner number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. You're listening to Radio Free America. Radio Free America. First. Chuck Schumer was on MSNBC on Saturday, so that means nobody heard Emerson, but we did.

Does this fool know that he has 50 members in the Senate, he doesn't have a majority? It's just that the vice president can break ties. He has no mandate, let alone a mandate, to fundamentally change America. That they almost lost the house, the only about 10 or 11 vote lead there and the only reason we say 10 or 11 is they're trying to steal an election in New York.

In other words, for all the attacks on Donald Trump, by the feckless Bushies, by the idiotic never Trump. And by the clowns in the media. Donald Trump save the Republican Party in the House and in the Senate, there's absolutely no question about that. And you may recall early on that they thought they might lose five to seven seats in the Senate. And we lost two seats in Georgia for several reasons, number one, the National Republican Senatorial Committee is a disaster and it's run by Mitch McConnell.

Number two, the two candidates were a disaster, quite frankly. Unless you like voting for mannequins and women, kids or whatever they call a female version, although when those mannequins were closed, they don't have genitalia, do they, Mr. Producer? Not that I'm looking closely, but I don't think they do.

Nonetheless. I want to show you what we're up against here, ladies and gentlemen, the neo Marxist Democrat Party, that's exactly what it is, their party, their media, their tech companies. Chuck Schumer is 50 votes in the Senate and he has to rely on Kamala Harris, but they've got bold ideas in mind. They want to make America, California and New York forever more. They want a one party country where allegiance is to the party. It's not enough.

That King Biden is sitting there. Signing one declaration after another. And in a fascistic dictatorial mode. And I want you to hear what Schumer had to say. On Saturday on MSL, count one go, we have one goal, big, bold change in America. Now let's stop.

Why do we need big, bold change in the greatest country in the face of the earth? Think about it. Think about it. Why do we need big, bold, centralized, ubiquitous government in the greatest country in the face of the earth, why? There is no rational reason, unless you're a power hungry Democrat leader who wants to make challenges to your power almost impossible. I don't want you to devour as much of the private sector as he possibly can.

These people are anti-American, hello, un-American, do you hear me? Media Matters, do you hear me? Media un-American. They never talk about constitutionalism. They never talk about capitalism, they never talk about private property rights, individual liberty, unless they use them in a sentence in which they are trashing them. And what they're seeking to do now. It's a death blow to liberty. That's right, I said it and it's true. As I said on Sundays, life, liberty and lovin, and you really should watch it, in my humble opinion, if you can't, you should DVR it as I choose.

Miss said to Judge Star. There are two things going on at once. Two things going on at once. That's really never happened in this country before. On the one hand. We have a monarchy in Joe Biden. Over 40 executive actions bypassing the legislature. So we have that going on, but at the same time, we have a mobocracy, we have a monarchy and a mobocracy, well, how can you have them at the same time?

Because what the framers assumed is that these elected officials have had some level of virtue because the people electing them would have some level of virtue. It turns out it's not true. So you can build whatever edifice you wish. But at the people phoning Donna, Virtue's sending these Democrats to Washington, D.C. to burn everything down and to deliver them the goods. It's impossible to set up any kind of government. To contain such insanity, so we have in the Senate and in the House, a mob, a mob that doesn't want to work with the Republicans, a mob that wants to institute and enshrine as much fundamental damage.

To the United States Constitution as possible. They want to control the bureaucracy. They want to control the election processes. They want to control the courts. And this is true. So let's start from the start from the top, Chuck Schumer on MSNBC Saturday go, we have one goal, big, bold change in America.

We would like the Republicans to join us in some of those things at least, and we want the Republicans to join us to help us destroy this republic and replace it.

With some kind of tyranny. And empower the Democrat Party. That's what they want the Republicans to do, and there's some Republicans who will do it. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Ben Sasse, Mitt Romney. Apparently me on the way out the door. Oh, there's some Republicans who will help them a lot. King's anger in the House, Cheney in the House. Go ahead. But we are going to get that change no matter what we can.

Now listen to that. He's the leader of 50 senators and myself included in the Senate, a minor, small, thin lead in the House, we're going to get that change no matter what.

No matter what. Who sounds like Putin now, who sounds like G now? Who sounds like some imam in the Middle East now? Go ahead, demand three huge issues we have to do climate. Huge issue facing the country, racial and economic inequality, which is the inequity, you idiot.

Don't you have the the language down yet? Go ahead.

But it's not better. Which demands change injustice in a big, bold way and improving our democracy.

So remember what I said. Whatever they say, they're improving and reforming or fixing. They're doing the opposite climate. Why is climate so big to these people?

Because it is a way to destroy capitalism and to grab as much power as possible.

Climate is everywhere, climate change, air, water, whatever. So that is an enormous amount of power that they seek to exercise. OK, that's number one. Number two, racial and economic inequality. What does that mean exactly, racial and economic? Let me let me give you a hint. It has nothing to do with racial and economic inequality, has to do with neo Marxism and Marxism. It's critical race theory and what he means by that is and why the language has subtly changed, as we pointed out, from racial equality to any inequity they don't believe.

That equality or inequality goes far enough. They don't believe the civil rights movement goes far enough. They don't believe Brown vs. Board of Education goes far enough. You have a white, dominant, white, privileged society. And this is why you hear this all the time, because what used to be considered correct excuse me, crackpot radicalism at Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School and everything with a cabal of cuke law professors has now. Moved itself into the society.

You even hear idiots on TV talking about it, so that's that. These are these are fundamental. Changes to America, which will limit the liberty. The opportunity. The prosperity. The rights. The mobility of every citizen in this country. So what he's talking about with these three big, bold changes, big changes in America. Is neo Marxism. Now, the idiots at Media and Media Matters don't even know what I'm talking about. Chuck Todd, that idiot, George Stephanopoulos, another it is a low IQ buffoons.

But trust me when I tell you this is exactly what's going on here. Go ahead, D.C. state automatic voter registration, getting rid of Citizens United, all the things embodied in H.R. one.

Just listen to what he said, making D.C. a state. The Constitution carves out the territory of the District of Columbia.

They don't have the power to make it a state via statute, even though they're going to try and gerrymander it, no, they don't. Automatic voter registration all over the country. Automatic receipt of mail in ballots all over the country, getting rid of Citizens United. And in other words, toppling free speech and the First Amendment. All Citizens United is as a Supreme Court decision that said individuals can spend whatever they wish to communicate with their fellow Americans on issues not backing any particular candidate.

He has a problem with that, even though it's the party and Biden is the candidate of dark money. And so they've put this all in H.R. one and more. To make it impossible for Republicans to win the presidency. To make it impossible for Republicans to win the Senate, plus adding more senators for the Democrats. And this is their goal. And we actually have Republicans in this country. Who are diverted on other issues, who say we want to work with the Democrats, they don't want to defeat them, they don't want to defeat their agenda, they want to work with them.

It's incredible. It is insane, this is unhinged. No wonder big tech. Is going around censoring everybody they possibly can. On the conservative side. No wonder big media is filled with a bunch of reprobates fresh out of political science class or fresh off Capitol Hill or who've worked for Democrats in other places. In order to spew lies and propaganda and social activism day in and day out. Go ahead, Bastin, McConnell would block up, but we're going to fight to pass it in the Senate.

That's why we made this one. So climate, racial inequality, economic inequality and democracy. I don't understand something.

Why does half the world try to come to America? With racial inequality, economic inequality. Climate disasters. Why would anybody come to such a country? I want you to listen to me and listen to me carefully. And I know my words are being taken down by the enemy, and that's OK, not the adversary, the enemy of this country. These people are at political war with our freedom, with our constitution and with our society. They mean to take it down.

It is they who are inciting anger and fury and division. It is they who are inciting hatred. Not me, not you, it is them, all we want to be is left alone, all we want to be is left to live our lives. We don't want to discriminate against anybody. And we don't want to be discriminated against. We don't want the system fixed, their franchise fixed in a way that only one party comes out on top.

Only one party, but look at everything they propose violates the Constitution or as an attack on capitalism, D.C. statehood violates the Constitution, automatic voter registration and anything else they put in H.R. one violates the Constitution. Why? Because the framers left it to the states to determine how they wanted to handle registration, there was no such thing. But let's registration parties that the time you can vote, whether there's mail in voting in modern times and so forth, they left it to the states.

But they want to nationalize that, they want to nationalize the First Amendment and free speech and determine what is and isn't speech. Every single one of the things they're proposing here is intended to roll over our constitutional barriers. Every damn one of them. I'll be right back. Much love in. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair. So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration.

Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain. We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered.

Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance to save the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today and living for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

There's 50 Republicans in the Senate. They need to be able to tie up the Democrats in every way conceivable. There's almost a majority Republicans in the House.

They need to think of every way possible to put the so-called handful of moderates in a position where they're scared to death they're going to lose their jobs.

And I want to explain something to you, and I'm going to have to carry it over to the bottom of the hour.

I touched on this the other day. The Democrats are not acting in the national interest, the Democrats are not acting on behalf of the country. The Democrats are not acting for we, the people. Everything that Chuck Schumer just said here is intended to empower Chuck Schumer and the Democrat Party, increasing Democrats in the Senate, changing the voting system, eliminating free speech, so-called racial inequality, which is an attack on the suburbs and an attack on the rural areas and so forth.

We know what they're talking about, economic inequality, which has a push for socialism and neo Marxism.

Which they believe will strengthen the Democrat Party because it'll strengthen the central government, their entire agenda is intended to empower the Democrat Party.

And the Democrat base even look at all the redistribution of wealth that's taking place, as I said before, it's redistribution of wealth in large measure from Republicans and Republican constituents to Democrats and Democrat constituents from the suburbs in the rural areas to the cities. That is exactly what's going on. It's the greatest power grab in American history. I'll be right back. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair.

So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today at Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom. In for Hillsdale Dotcom.

America's most powerful conservative voice, The Mark Levin Show, Dialla, now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

It's not just a matter of being a powerful conservative voice. It's a matter of using. Whatever God given talent, you have to defend this republic. And I'm here behind this microphone, and I believe the arguments I make in the positions I take. At the point of the spear. And this is why I shouldn't get annoyed, why other people glom onto them, maybe, maybe we need them to go on and we need to spread the word. Because what's happening right now?

Is a. Massive assault on the country. On the Constitution. On the Republican Party, but they're too stupid to know it. On the whole system by a political party, the Democrat Party. That is trying to use LA law and the federal bureaucracy to empower its base. And to enshrine its decisions. To immunize them from any future votes. There are trying to turn the election system inside out, steal the authority from the states. And impose.

The election processes. That have been used by the Democrats to destroy their states and to destroy competition in their states, one party. And so they are using the policies that the Democrat Party in California used when they got power finally. They made sure they'd never lose it again, and now, you know, not only have veto proof majorities. And the California legislature, you have super duper veto proof majority. In other words, a Republican cannot win that state.

Statewide, period. Period. And it was changed in a period of about 10 to 12 years. As so many other states are changing now. The Democrat Party. Is on a power binge. And they are not going to let go. They do not have a majority in the Senate. Schumer is not the majority leader. They have a tie breaker in the vice president. And they're going to use that. They're going to use that. To destroy major chunks of our constitutional system.

They do not have a significant majority in the House. They have a small, thin majority in the House. They have no mandate for that which they intend to do none. They're strengthening their base, they are strengthening their constituent groups, they're setting them up for legal protection, they're setting them up for massive transfer of wealth to them from the opposition base. That is exactly what's going on, they use nomenclature like climate change and racial inequity and economic inequality for the purpose of empowering themselves.

Empowering themselves. That's their plan. The reason they want to attack the Supreme Court isn't because they don't get good decisions, a lot of them from their perspective out of the Supreme Court, it's because they want all decisions out of the Supreme Court supporting their radical, unconstitutional anti-American agenda. There I laid it out. Schumer talks about wanting to undo the horrible decisions of the court. They defang the Voting Rights Act. The Voting Rights Act has been defanged.

One section of the Voting Rights Act in which the federal government was controlling virtually every electoral decision by certain states in the South. After decades and decades under the Voting Rights Act, the Department of Justice determined. That that kind of federal authority over those states was no longer necessary, but you see, when you're race baiting and when you see everything through the prism and lens of race, which is the whole idea of critical race theory and identity politics and all the rest, you cannot give it up.

And you must condemn those who dare to disagree with you. So in addition, what's taking place? We are fascists, fascists running big tech. Who are censoring people and organizations left and right? That have nothing to do with violence, nothing to do with violence whatsoever. You literally have media figures who are insisting that their competitors be shut down. CNN is insisting that Fox be shut down. That the cable carriers stop carrying Fox. You have individuals.

Her news people, quote unquote, who talk about deprogramming, anybody who voted for Trump now, how would they go about that exactly? You have publishers like Simon and Schuster, which are supposed to be defending books, controversial books, all books. Which told a United States senator who had signed up with them to hit the road not because of anything he read, he wrote. But because of what the media and the Democrats and the never Trump are saying about that, Senator.

You have this so-called cancer culture, which is really too passive. Were the institutions that are controlled by the left and the Democrats, which are the vast majority of them. Whether they're universities and faculty. Whether they're major corporations, what have you. Are literally removing people, firing people or stunting their career advancement because of their viewpoints. Because of whom they voted for? And that's not only being tolerated, it's being celebrated. And then on top of that, you have a president of the United States.

Who thinks he's Benito Mussolini sitting there signing one law after another? The problem is nobody passed the law. Nobody even passed the law. The Democrat Party is not a party of the people, the Democrat Party is not a party of the Constitution. The Democrat Party is not a party of minorities. It uses minorities. It abuses minorities. The Democrat Party is a neo Marxist European style party, that's what it is. That's what it's become. It'll say anything.

Even if it's damaging to the society, even it's damaging the people in the society in light fuses political fuses everywhere it can. It creates turmoil and controversy and provocation wherever it can. There are virtually no limits to what it's capable of doing, like trying to unseat a legitimately elected president of the United States and then trying to unseat United States senators and members of the House of the opposite party who dared to raise questions about the election. Not something so crazy and insane as Russian collusion.

Minya. These are people who are glad. Rogue FBI director, deputy director, associate director and FBI agents. Tried to scuttle the candidacy of the Republican candidate, Donald Trump. They're glad the FISA court was abused. They're glad our intelligence agencies were unmasking innocent citizens. They're thrilled by all of this. The media are, too. The media to the media have given up any concept of professionalism. Any concept of professional, the fact is even the relative handful of journalists who are really journalists and want to be journalists are scared to death.

They're scared to death. Because if they don't fall into line and goose step behind CNN and MSNBC and The Washington Post and The New York Times. And NBC and CBS and ABC, they will be attacked relentlessly. As sellouts. As right wingers. And the worst thing you could be called in the media as a right winger. Oh, my God, don't say, oh, no, no, you must be a right winger. Every aspect of governance in this society has turned into something that is foreign, that is alien, and that is used to empower the Democrat Party and its base and used against those of you who want to be free.

I'll give you a perfect example, Gina McCarthy used to be the head of the EPA. She's a radical, unhinged nutjob. She's now the national climate adviser, a national climate adviser. We have John Kerry, who is the climate czar. We have a head of the EPA climate knuckleheads everywhere. And what did she say? About climate change. Listen to this cut to go climate change is a racial justice issue because it exacerbates the challenges in the communities that have been left behind.

It goes after the very same communities that pollution has held back and racism has held back. And it's our opportunity.

This is the Hill. Newspaper, which has gone hard left, in my view. So you see how they. How they intermix these issues. How they fuse all these issues. So you see, if you're not acknowledging climate change, you don't want to address it, then you must believe in racial injustice.

You know what? What are you talking about? While roads go through minority neighborhoods, all roads go through. Everybody's no, you don't understand, there's energy plants and everybody said, I have an energy plant right down the street. No, no, no. You don't understand.

It's. Climate. Climate change. We have to acknowledge it. We have to destroy our economic system. We have to empower centralized government. To control who lives where and how and federal zoning, because otherwise it promotes racial injustice. What's happened here? Is every crackpot idea and scheme. Thought up in law schools. Far up in colleges and universities. Far up in the faculty lounge. Are now being instituted in our society. Years and years ago, I told you when people said, well, ignore the intellectuals, I said, no, pay attention to the intellectuals.

Because they're the dangerous ones. Ideas do have consequences. Ideas have consequences, ideas didn't come out of the union hall.

These ideas didn't come out of the civil rights movement. These ideas didn't come out of a diner. None of these ideas came out of colleges and universities working very closely with the Democrat Party in the hard left.

That's what's going on here. I'll be right back. Much love in. Are you worried about America's future times of trouble are full of reasons to despair, but those who built and preserved our country didn't despair. So to do our part, we need to draw on the books, the history and the ideas that gave our forefathers and mothers strength and inspiration. Hillsdale College was founded in 1844 to teach these very things, and it teaches them still today. We can all study these things, all with Hillsdale College professors right in our homes through Hillsdale Free online courses, we can study the history of our civilization, the wisdom of ancient and Judeo-Christian philosophers, and the writings of Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

We can reacquaint ourselves with our Constitution. We can learn how the Constitution has been undermined and more importantly, how it can be recovered. Friends, as we fight in defense of family, faith and freedom, let us draw on the best of the past with Hillsdale guidance that saved the greatest nation on Earth. Begin learning today and living for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's 11 for Hillsdale Dotcom. Live for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Now, next hour, we're going to talk about this impeachment stuff, but not as you might expect, but the same context.

What is the Democrat Party trying to do? The Democrat Party is trying to destroy the Republican Party.

Unfortunately, too many establishment Republicans are too stupid to understand what's taking place.

You see, working men and women in this country, union and non-union, have no place to go. But the Republican Party, it's like the Tea Party movement 10 years ago. But the Republicans are too stupid to understand this.

They think they need the Chamber of Commerce and illegal aliens. And the the boardrooms in America, which hate their guts anyway. But I want to address this in more detail next hour, that failure to defend this president, that is Trump. And to defend him on substantive grounds and start ignoring the Wall Street Journal editorial page and National Review and the other knuckleheads is critical.

The Republican Party is not only going to survive. But advance. The Democrats are very happy with repression, they believe in repression. They believe in repressing those with whom they disagree. They don't even have a problem with those with whom they agree rioting violently, as we saw this summer. If you watch this stuff carefully, they reveal themselves. You know, you could ask my wife, but she's not here to ask. I stay up very, very late.

Sometimes till 2:00, 3:00, 4:00 in the morning, or I get up very early. 4:00 or 5:00, 6:00 in the morning, it depends. I don't sleep very well ever, but I don't sleep very well these days for sure. I'm trying to figure out exactly what's taking place and trying to figure out what I can say about it, I'm trying to figure out what we can do about it. And I know many of you are having exactly the same problem.

But I want you to know I share deeply your concern for the future of this country. Deeply. I see exactly what's going on, and I know exactly why it's going on. Which I think the explanation in the early part of this hour lays out. This is the greatest power grab by one political party. In American history. That is ever. Ever. And it's across the board. This is one of the reasons they wanted Donald Trump out of the way.

This is one of the reasons they wanted to destroy him. It's not because Donald Trump knew what they were doing. It's because. He opposed what they were doing. As a sensible individual, it was common sense to him. As a patriotic individual. He got in the way of Obama's third term, but was supposed to be Hillary Clinton for eight years and then the next one for eight years and the next one, and they couldn't believe Trump disrupted it.

And so they had to tear him down. They had to try and ruin him. They needed to try and get him out by hook or by crook. He was saying things they didn't like and he was saying it in ways that expose them, expose the media, expose Pelosi, expose Schumer. They wanted a Romney or McCain type guy they could kick around who has no attachment to the general will of the people or the public generally.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here now broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven. Create one two three four one one. I don't know.

Kyle Packer has a site and know him or not, he's written something that's very, very well put together, something we've talked about. But I like the way he lays it out here. And I want to share it with you. And he writes, The Trump incitement narrative about the capital riot is falling apart before our very eyes. The evidence is piling up that no such thing could have occurred. Says it's been nearly universal media narrative following the capital siege of January 6th, Donald Trump's speech incited an insurrection.

The evidence, however, is piling up that no such thing could have occurred. Let's briefly retrace the accusations and known evidence.

On January 6th, amid a large gathering at the nation's capital to protest what millions of Americans perceived to be illegitimately held elections in key swing states. The former president gave a speech. The timing of the speech was the convening of the joint session of Congress to validate the slate of electors. From the Electoral College. It has been argued that Donald Trump's language at the speech, including his using the words fight, quote unquote, was deliberately incendiary.

But let's take a look at the actual language of the speech, Trump deliberately says fight in the commonplace political context. Trump said for years, Democrats have gotten away with election fraud and weak Republicans, and that's what they are. There's so many weak Republicans and we have great ones. Jim Jordan and some of these guys, they're out there fighting the house. Guys are fighting, but it's incredible. Now, it should be noted further that allegations of election fraud are not incitement, indeed, the same mainstream media accusing Trump of inciting the crowd with fraud allegations accuse Donald Trump himself of perpetuating fraud in the 2016 election, as you well know.

Here are a smattering of headlines. New Yorker, how Russia helped swing the election for Trump. Time, here's what we know so far about Russia's 2016 meddling CNN 2016 presidential campaign hacking fast facts. There were breathless nightly accusations from Rachel Maddow about Trump Russia collusion, Hillary Clinton repeatedly disputed the legitimacy of Trump's election in 2016 based on such allegations. She even called him an illegitimate president. The entire teetering edifice of daily lies and accusations about Trump came crashing down with the Mueller report.

Robert Mueller was the last white knight tapped to bring down the president with evidence that colluded with the Russians to rig the 2016 election. No such evidence was ever produced. The entire narrative was debunked. Much like the Trump incitement narrative will prove debunked. Beyond the obvious point that Trump specifically told the crowd to, quote, peacefully and patriotically, make your voices heard, unquote, there is nothing remarkable about this particular Trump speech.

It is filled with bromides and shopworn phrases that he has used for years to excite his base. The only difference this time was that there was a preplanned plot to incite violence and rioting at the capital. The Washington Post earlier reported that the Capitol Police warned the Congress many times, days before the riot that the building could be attacked. This is a point that is gaining traction. And here's what just the news, the great site, just the news said in a recent piece.

Growing evidence of advanced planning and coordination of the January six storming of the capital. Undermines claims that the rioters were responding spontaneously to former President Trump's speech to supporters about a mile and a half away. According to legal and intelligence experts. Now, the now resigned Capitol Police chief inexplicably was turned down six times to his requests that security be increased, the National Guard was instructed to maintain a weak presence and low visibility.

Michael Yon, the nation's most experienced war correspondent, reported that the security presence made little sense and he detected numerous suspect things about the mix of groups in the crowd. Now, the reports further solidifying the obvious. The pipe bombs placed at the RNC and DNC, among other places, potentially is a diversion for an attack on a Capitol building replace there that night before CNN noted, quote, two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican Party headquarters discovered on January six were planted the night before the insurrection at the Capitol.

The FBI said Friday. Now, this is extremely problematic for the narrative about Trump's speech inciting the Capitol building attack in combination with these facts. A former high ranking FBI official explains that it's extremely unlikely that Trump's speech could qualify as incitement by any reasonable legal standard. He said for speech to meet the threshold of incitement, a speaker must first indicate a desire for violence and second, demonstrate a capability or reasonable indication of capability to carry out the violence, according to Kevin Brock, former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI.

It's quite obvious the president of the United States as commander in chief, and I've pointed this out many times of the armed forces and head of some of the most powerful intelligence agencies in the world, we're not inciting insurrection or coup from a mob of common political supporters, an amateurish rabble like these fellows who are suspiciously emblematic of the media's warped reading of who is likely to be a Trump supporter. Now, this is especially true given that Republicans in the House and Senate were poised to make the president's case.

That election fraud or or at the least unlawful election processes had indeed taken place in several swing states and had given now President Biden an unfair advantage.

And it goes on. There is not only double negative, no evidence of incitement. There is lots of evidence of planning. Pre protest and pre Trump speech. Moreover, as I pointed out the other week. The New York Times itself, when you did a timeline based on their reporting in the memo that they acquired. It would indicate from their own reporting. That the siege of the Capitol building began 20 minutes before Donald Trump even finished his speech. So we have.

Unequivocal evidence of planning for a violent attack on the capital. Before the protest date. We have unequivocal evidence that the capital was attacked before the president finished his speech. We have unequivocal evidence in the president's speech that he didn't incite anybody to do anything. This is like Russia collusion all over again, isn't it, Mr. Producer? It's like Russia collusion all over again. Washington Post pipe bombs found their capital on January six, were believed to have been placed the night before.

January 29, that report underreported, of course. But then there's this. Also, The Washington Post and I needed for reporters to write this, Mike DeBonis, Tom Hamburger. Who's a cheeseburger, current American, whatever.

And Amy Gardner, House Democrats building elaborate, emotionally charged case against Trump.

So these radical no nothing Democrats in the House are leaking to their favorite media friends and outlets what it is they plan to do and none of this elaborate, emotionally charged case against Trump.

And that's the purpose and elaborate emotionally charged case. Maybe they're going to incite Mr. Producers' that their purpose. House Democrats have sought out new cell phone footage of the Capitol siege, as well as updated details about injured police officers as they seek to build an emotionally compelling impeachment case against former President Trump.

What does that have to do with the president in signing anything? Absolutely nothing. Zero. So the Democrat Party is doing this, why? Because they believe in what they're saying, no, they're liars and they know they're liars. In addition. To destroying the constitutional order. In addition to, hopefully, from their perspective, destroying the franchise. And separation of powers. And the legislative process. They wish to divide the Republican Party. Between the establishment.

And then nonestablishment between the establishment and Main Street. And they know. That despite how the establishment Republicans will vote. They know that those establishment Republicans. Share the Democrat Party's contempt. For the Republican president who got more votes than any Republican in American history. More votes across the board. Then any Republican in American history. And so what they want to do. Is make him as controversial. As possible, beyond all the things they've thrown at Trump before they're throwing this at him to.

They do not want to see Trump ever again. They do not want so many people excited. Truly engaged. In politics, in their country, as they saw. Behind the Trump rebellion. And the Trump movement. They want to make sure their next Republican nominee. Is another loser like Romney or McCain? Or a bush. Or what have you. They don't ever want to see the likes of a Donald Trump again any more than they wanted to see the likes of a Ronald Reagan again.

Or way back when a Calvin Coolidge again, in other words, they want to pick the Republicans pick. I notice that the media that is the Democrat propagandists in this country are slobbering all over their favorite congressmen, that will be Adam Kinzinger of Illinois. He got to kiss ass piece in The Washington Post to get a kiss ass piece in Politico, I think their sister publication.

I could be wrong. Poor Adam. Poor Adam. It being called all kinds of things like evil and diabolical. He's really stressed out from family and friends like. This is a man who voted against Trump in 2016, if he had had his way, Hillary Clinton would have been president. Imagine that. And he opposed Trump again in 2020. I hope he's happy now we have Joe Biden. I hope he's happy now. With a juggernaut of anti constitutionalism and anti-Americanism that is swirling around, I hope he's happy now, actually, I don't give a damn about the guy, but you get my point.

Then there's Liz Cheney. He's come on this program before. Who I've liked very much, I've liked her family. And it wasn't merely that she voted for impeachment, that would be bad enough, it's what she said. She sounded like Adam Schiff. She sounded like Nancy Pelosi, she sounded like Chuck Schumer. And she convicted the president in the United States without one syllable of testimony. Or evidence of any kind. I'll be right back. Much love in.

Dana Bash, the GOP senator, Rob Portman, for time, because he says we can't get any compromise here.

How about defending the republic, sir? That's a little above his head, I'm afraid. Here's a nice guy. But you know what they say about nice guys.

Dana Bash at CNN. Tell me if you can distinguish between her and a Democrat cut for go vote yes or are you losing it?

You say it's inexcusable. If you don't vote yes, one could argue that you are doing just that.

You were excusing if you don't vote to remove. Donald Trump has already removed that's the first step before you can banish them from ever serving in public office again, that's why it's irrational. It doesn't make any sense and it's not what the framers said or intended. It's seriatim, one thing happens, then the next thing, listen to her what Dana Bash? If you don't vote, you know, to convict, then you're excusing his behavior. What behavior?

You may not like what he said, you may not like that he objected to the outcome of the election, but so what? See, if you don't vote, this is the meat, if you don't vote, you don't vote to convict him. If you don't chase him down and Mar a Lago. And burn a scarlet letter into his forehead, then, aren't you excusing an insurrection, sir? That's CNN. Go ahead. Well, it can be inexcusable and yet not be subject to a conviction after the president has left office, if you look at the Constitution and there aren't that many words about impeachment, so it's easy to do and I encourage your viewers to do so.

It's always connected with removal from office. And this is why the chief justice of the Supreme Court refuses to come and preside over this trial.

Well, sir, you've mentioned the Constitution. You do understand that she doesn't care about that. More of it would be nice if you guys grew a backbone and explained that the president didn't incite an insurrection.

But they can't do that, they won't do that. And the media insist on. Here we have a guy by the name of Senator Van Hollen of Maryland, a complete moron being questioned by Democrat Obama, former appointee Jim Shuto on the Constipated News Network.

You see how this works. It's also grotesque catfight go.

You do have some of your Democratic colleagues, Tim Kaine among them, who say, listen, conviction and conviction ain't going to happen here. Let's find a separate path. Let's censure the president instead. What's your response to that?

My response is Tim Kaine is as dumb as a doorknob. Show me where in the Constitution Center exists. It's been used once against a president, Andrew Jackson, who was eventually reversed.

There is no censure in the Constitution, just like you can't vote to call a president.

A cumquat or a cucumber has as much relevance as censure. Anyway, here's Van Hollen.

It was we need to go forward with the trial. It is our constitutional No.

Ashkenazic constitutional obligation. Your constitutional obligation is to uphold the Constitution, you idiot. Not shredded in burning.

They get some crime scene. Not to pack the court packed the Senate. Roll through the filibuster, change the voting system. Don't you love these lefties? You know, it's my job to uphold the Constitution, then resign your ass, you jerk. Your whole ideology is anti constitution. Van Hollen, what's his first name? I don't even know is a Chris. So, Chris Chris Van Hollen, he'll go down in the annals of history.

No question about that. I'll be right back. Certainly proud of it. Call by Mark for being show seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

You never heard of John Berman before. And it's a good thing he's a very stupid man. Hence he gets a job at CNN as a host. I'd say he's the stupid looking one, but that's the whole line up there, quite frankly. So John Berman's on the Constipated News Network. And as you as you may know, most of you don't because who watches? I don't. But nonetheless. He's a huge fan. Of Chucky Schumer. And he listens to every word that the schmuck star has to say.

And he almost regurgitates it. He almost regurgitates every word that the shmucks there has to say, and I'm going to prove it to you. Here, John Berman on CNN today, cut six go, so you are going to sit and listen to the Senate impeachment trial of the former president of the United States who has been impeached for inciting the erection, inciting the insurrection at the US Capitol.

Isn't that pretty much exactly what the Maxtor had to say last week, Mr. Producer? So their minds are focused on erections, I think. Erections or either that or they can't pronounce elections or. Who knows what the problem is, but there's clearly a problem in the Liberal Democrat Party ranks, whether they're on the floor of the Senate or in our newsrooms in America. So John Berman is no Walter Cronkite.

He is no Howard K. Smith, who was among my favorite.

Our David Brinkley, who was among my favorite, he's just another CNN moron. And so to repeat, Katsuko, go, so you are going to sit and listen to the Senate impeachment trial of the former president of the United States who has been impeached for inciting the erection inside.

So I think for now on ladies and gentlemen, we need to say, because you have the Senate want to be majority leader.

You have Mr. Nobody, John Berman at CNN insisting that this is an impeachment over the incitement of an erection.

Now, is that constitutional, we need to ask one of our legal analysts, maybe Jenny McCarthy can tell us is that. We definitely not ask, too, but Mr. Producer, because we don't know what kind of reaction we'll get from him, as you might imagine.

So the question now is, when the president gave his speech, did he incite an erection? What Chuck Schumer and John Berman. I think it's a fair question. It's kind of grotesque, but they keep bringing it up. Maybe they'll investigate that. Maybe they'll investigate it, maybe not. Let's take some calls, let's see if our friends are still there.

Lawrence, I know the state of Oregon. I mean, the state of confusion on the great KSL am. How may I how are you, Lawrence?

This is rainy, but nevertheless. Yes, wait a minute, Ronnie.

Mr. Ronnie and Lawrence are two different names. You are aware that. OK, Ronnie, you go ahead and lay it on the line number one.

Yes, I'm going to Jezebel's state number two. The purpose that they try to do is basically get us back to go to serfdom and slavery mindset. You cannot serve two masters of this country. You cannot go through and say that you're going to do something, but yet you're taking away the hands that makes individuality and suffered and suffering really from our creator God. And the sad thing is you don't know your history. You're doomed to repeat it. And the problem is that they dumbed down our kids in the schools they go through this week.

If you're an American, my family tree is very mixed. Irish, Cherokee, Greek, and I'm black. But I don't see myself as a black person. I see myself as an American and individuals and I see myself that is if you're going to do so. Promise made, promise kept. That's what they liked about the president, the people. He was a servant of, the people he walked by. God, Mr President, in all that time, Mr.

Levine, that talked about God, gave God the glory, talked about a Founding Fathers principles, and yet he wasn't perfect. How do you do that? But his actions got more since Reagan or maybe Kennedy. But yes, they want to use race. That way they can hold on to forty eight years. I heard about we're going to put ourselves in the urban cities. This president did forty years. Maxine Waters was a city councilman in like.

All I see is they using power, deception. And this really is restoration of people's character and honor or even put them out of business or try to storm them in jail. This is basically Khrushchev's world right now, the other Democrat Party. And nobody don't understand that history. But there will be enemies within. And this is what we got with the Democrat Party. Some Republicans, that establishment, they want us to be shut up. They do not want us to be involved.

They do not want not one stand on two principles, which was founded by a Judeo Christian values, who gave us this country, not just the economics. And yet they want to keep us.

And let me just add to the Democrat Party has embraced this radical racist agenda called critical race theory, and basically, as I say, was hatched by a cabal of law professors.

And now it has spread throughout society, 16 19 project into our schools, into our bureaucracy because of the executive order Joe Biden just signed. And basically that that theory is this. That America can never be saved. It must be destroyed because forevermore you have this white dominance in America, you have this white privilege and you hear this all over the place now.

And there's nothing that can be done about it as long as these institutions, the constitution, a capitalist system, are in existence because they perpetuate this white supremacy.

There is no neutral forums, no neutral courts, no neutral anything until the entire set. And so what it is critical race theory is basically dressed up Marxism.

And that's why your black lives matter, a fusion between the critical race theory. And Marxism, and to watch these suckers in these corporations on the basketball court, on ESPN, on CNN, on MSNBC, in these newspaper to watch these suckers buy into this and actually many have embraced it and believe it is is contemptible because as you just pointed out, we are individual human beings.

We I don't care what race you are. I have different motivations than the white guy down the street who have different motivations than than than relatives. I have different interests.

The different things affect me. It's not like, gee, look at me, I'm white. So I believe X, Y, Z. This is the dehumanization of individual Americans. But it makes it very neat and the narrative very, very persuasive.

If you are a radical, a revolutionary who wants to categorize people into groups, categorize them into stereotypes while claiming that you oppose stereotypes, it is a very diabolical ideology.

And this is what we're facing right now. Ronnie, I want to thank you for your call. Very, very sharp. I appreciate it.

Let's continue, shall we? I think we will. Let's go to Steve Springfield, Massachusetts, on the Mark Levin. Steve, I got a problem here, buddy. My damn printer is is clogged up. And anyway, you go right ahead. What a great caller to last caller was. You guys are exactly right about critical race theory and the overarching philosophy behind it, which is to historicism. And Karl Popper wrote a book on the poverty of historicism, which I want to get because on the name of the book is.

The open society is called the poverty of historicism while there is that.

I quote Popper fairly liberally in mirror topia, by the way. He was a brilliant, brilliant man, and, you know, Soros is said to have been an inherent to Popper, but he bastardizes Popper's writings. I'm just saying this, but he had Marxism, all right? He he really broke it into a thousand pieces. Go ahead.

You know, what they did is they took on this critical race theory. And because the United States, the rule, because the ruling power structure set was well, they tried to make this thing where it's all illegitimate, it's all racist. They blame everything on racism. And racism is something that you're just supposed to let them speak because you can't argue against it.

And why can't you argue against them? What does your wife they say if you're not? If you're not black, then you can't you can't really respond, and if you are black and you disagree with them, then really you may be black physically. But when it comes to your mind and your thinking method, you're really white. So in other words, if you disagree with them, then then you're a racist, period.

Right, exactly. Well, they know it well, they bought critical race theory and I'm reading the glossary because that's the fastest way to absorb the contents of a book because this is really an evil document also.

So Biden signs this executive order. To spread racial equity, now you say you're looking at that book, let me ask a question. Why is Biden using the word equity and not equality? It's not because of what people think.

Why is that? Well, equality has to do with the equal distribution, which James Madison rebuked in the federalist number tended to be called no, no.

Why, why? Why is Biden not using the phrase racial equality by using the phrase racial equity?

I'll tell you why.

Somebody wrote that for him, who is extraordinarily radical because one of the founding fathers of the critical race theory and I'm not going to keep going off on this, I'm just pointing out a guy by the name of Derrick Bell, he said all this talk about equality in the civil rights movement and Brown versus Board of Education, all that is.

Is a are decisions that make white people feel good because they didn't change a damn thing for the outcomes of the black person, and so they dismiss this term equality as the white privilege, the white person's way of sort of generalizing the plight of the whole of of of minorities.

And so somebody who believes in this stuff. Actually change the word equality to equity for Joe Biden to avoid criticism from the most radical elements of our colleges and universities. That's why they put the word equity in there.

I'm just explaining that to the American people. Great. Call my friend. Very, very informed. We'll be right back.

Much love in. Let's go to Rob if he's still there at Grand Rapids on the Mark Levin, how are you, sir?

Mr. Levin, thank you for taking my call, as usual. A great show. Oh, thank you. You mentioned earlier that you mentioned earlier that you kind of stay up at night wondering how to solve some of the problems that we have in this country. And I got to tell you, without trying to sound too negative, I think this country is lost. I think the only thing we can do is to slow it down. And, you know, people say, well, you know, you you speak up by voting at the ballot box.

The problem is and I live in a state where we have an idiot that was just elected that voted for Mr. Mayor. Representative. Mayor.

Boy, what a fool. The Republicans. No kidding. No kidding. I've been telling people that the liberals, the Democrats are evil and the Republicans are wusses. They don't want to play. I don't want to say dirty. You should have some morals and ethics. But they just sit back and total man is worthless and the whole lot of them are pretty much worthless. And that's why I believe this country is lost, because I don't think voting is going to make a difference.

The only thing that will, sir, and I say this with all respect and seriousness, as people like yourself rush. God help us all when he's gone. And Glenn Beck and Hannity, what do you want us to do, sir? Talk. Fight until they drag your sorry butts out of the studio and shut you down permanently. All right, sir. Well, I'm going to do that. But it's going to take more than that, it is going to take voting, it's going to take changing legislatures, it's going to take forcing Republican legislatures to act.

It's going to take you folks contacting a member of the House and Senate to let them know that you're going to run against them or you're going to defeat them. You're going to do whatever you have to do.

It takes state attorneys general bringing reams and reams of lawsuits against these fraudulent executive orders. And a host of other things, thank you for your sir.

All right, here, this is interesting, so we have Mark Zuckerberg, January 21 on a conference call recorded by the great Project Veritas and Roy Austin, vice president of civil rights, deputy general counsel of Facebook.

On a conference call, and we're going to play that, too, and we're going to see exactly what these people have to say. And then we're going to go to Jen Psaki. You're wondering why your speech is under attack?

Well, these identity ideologies based on race, ethnicity, genitalia and all the rest of it, they believe that if you oppose them or you speak out against their political, social, cultural views, that's hate speech. And that all hate speech should be banned because if it's not banned, then basically you're able to use speech to undermine them. This is their view. This is why you see in these various WOAK industries and so forth, support to ban.

From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by Aimé, the Association of Mature American Citizens, now over two million conservative members, Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Amax U.S. Join.

He's here now broadcasting from the underground command post here, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. So you are going to sit and listen to the Senate impeachment trial of the former president of the United States who has been impeached for inciting the erection, inciting the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Hmm. Schumer's boy there, they both have something in common.

They've erections on their minds. Mr. Producer. Hello, I'm Mark Levin. Our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. And for the children listening out there. Remember the erection sets, Mr. Producer, young enough to remember that all enough, that's what we're talking about, you know, the erection sets.

I remember as a kid, they were made out of metal, thin metal, some kind of metal, and you would erect them and that's what we're talking about.

Inciting an erection of, you know, of a building or whatever. I forget the name of the of the product. I'll have to look that up now, and I'm thinking about it. These idiots can't help but. Anyway, over PJ Media. Tyler O'Neal, very good writer and I would argue reporter, Anatomy of a cover up, media outlets. Barry Cuomo, nursing home report.

Sencer guest update. Now, this guy Cuomo really should be off to prison, he's got more blood on his hands and than a butcher, he really does. On Monday morning, Dawn Best, whose mother died in April after covid-19 ravaged her nursing home, accused NBC News and other outlets of censoring her condemnations of Governor Andrew Cuomo. You know, Cuomo infamously directed nursing homes to accept patients who test positive for covid-19 in contradiction of federal guidelines. NBC News allegedly told best not to even mention Cuomo name in her interview.

Meanwhile, other legacy media outlets ignored the story altogether. And now we know, thanks to Letitia James, of all people, and her damning report, that Cuomo underreported deaths in nursing homes and senior citizen facilities by 50 percent.

Don't we call it like a criminal cover up, Mr.. Yet best story proved the most egregious, appearing on Fox and Friends Monday morning, Best said the multiple news outlets coached her to leave Cuomo out of her criticism of New York's covid-19 nursing home policy. This this is just the way it is. It's disgusting.

I like to say Governor Cuomo failed us. Now I'm allowed to say it on your program. Best said and. Yes. All right. There we go. Well, I kind of got used to because the media was never letting me say Governor Cuomo all along, and it was being kept out of every interview that I was in. Then I started every sentence that they asked with Governor Cuomo so they couldn't do that to me. So then they were forced to literally ask me to cut out Governor Cuomo.

His name of the woman said Lester Holt Show wasn't the only one to do it.

Lester, Lester, Lester. Lester. I call you Lester, what are you doing, Lester? So what happened specifically on that show was I was telling them that Governor Cuomo failed us. His book should be named Not the Lessons of Leadership. It should be lessons in failure, Bess recalled. She added that an NBC News staffer stopped me and she said to me, Can you say that a different way without Governor Cuomo, his name? Just say New York failed you.

So I had no choice. I had to say New York failed me. Oh, yeah. All you people in New York, you failed the lady, not Cuomo. We're not going to hold him to account, no. According to best, multiple media outlets not only censored her interviews to cut out criticism Cuomo, but also directed her avoid mentioning the governor's name at all, Yepes as a deeply personal reason to condemn Kormos policy. She said, my mom was in the best nursing home, getting the best care Premraj, 24 27, fine, healthy and happy.

Within three weeks of Kormos deadly directive, we sent the covid positive patients into the nursing home. My mother was dead from neglect. That was because the nursing home was overrun with covid patients. I know this because the doctor told me when I called and asked what was wrong with my mother, she said, and this is a quote, she was frantic. She said, the culprit is everywhere. It's in every unit that doctors have. The nurses have it and your mother may have it.

I had her tested. She didn't have it. It was dehydration. Best record. My mother died of neglect because of Governor Cuomo, the bereaved daughter concluded. Now, best mother may not have died from covid-19, but Kamus policy appears to have significantly contributed to her death. A Como's deflected criticism, accusing the Trump administration of launching a political attack, falsely insisting that he followed federal guidance on the issue, which of course, he did not. He's a liar.

Yet the legacy media has brushed aside criticism, Oklahoma's covid-19 policies, quote, We even won an Emmy Award from his for his daily covid-19 briefings. It published a book about his supposed success in handling the pandemic. PJ Media's Matt Margolis eviscerated the basic premise that Kormos book briefly laying out the governance. Many errors on the pandemic. Now, despite Cuomo shoddy records, CNN brought the governor on its new shows no fewer than 47 times since the beginning of March 20 20, according to a search of CNN transcripts.

That's right, they had the porn actress, one of their, I think 447 times, and her corrupt lawyer, four thousand and forty seven times.

So, you know, over the last ten months, CNN invited the governor on to his brother's show no fewer than 11 times. Most of these are rather chummy with Chris Cuomo joking about the pandemic with his brother. Perhaps the most cringe worthy interview came last May when Chris Cuomo teased his brother with a giantess swab rather than pressing the governor on his nursing home scandal. Now, this interview took place a mere 10 days after the governor had finally rescinded the policy.

Here's a list of Kormos appearances on CNN. March 3rd, March 7th, March 8th, March 9th, March 10th, March 11, March 14, 15, 16, March 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 27, 27, 28, 30, April 2nd, April 5th, April 5th, April 7th, 8th, 13, 13, 15, 20, 20 excuse me, 20 seconds, 20, 30. May 3rd, May 5th, May 13th, 20th, June 1st, 12th, 18, 22nd, 24th, 16th, July 16, July 24, September 25.

October nine. October 13. October 26. November 13. November 13. December 21. January 26. Boy, he's appearing like a. Like a bad rash. Media bias like this helps explain how the uninspiring Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. defeated Donald Trump the 2012 election, they write, while legacy media outlets demonize Trump's covid-19 response, even resorting to outright lies and condemning him for xenophobia when he used the same words to refer to the pandemic that Legacy Media report has had months earlier.

They repeatedly praised Cuomo, despite the governor's serious failings. Even after last week's damning report, many outlets are still carrying Cuomo as water.

An NBC News source gave Mediaite a full version now whatever. Of the NBC News interview featuring best and the video appears to contradict best claims in the interview best, says NBC reporter Kristen Dahlgren, to ask her that question in a different way because it didn't say. That as well as I could. Oh, yes. All right, so there's a correction here, but what isn't corrected? Cuomo is a liar. He was on CNN 47 times. He takes no responsibility for what he did.

He lies about federal guidelines that certainly did not require him at the time. We spoke about this at some length with Dr. Healy, who called into the program, and she called into the program last week.

I mean, Cuomo got an Emmy. How come if he's blaming Trump, how come Trump didn't get an Emmy two? I mean, Cuomo is writing about his great success now he's writing. Well, he wasn't me. It was Trump, Trump, Trump. Talk about impeachment, that a whole should be impeached and removed. But he won't be. Meanwhile, Politico's running cover for Joe Biden. No surprise there, ladies and gentlemen. It's a mess by the first 10 days dominated by vaccine mysteries.

So the incompetence and inexperience of the Biden team reveals itself. As we all know, it would. And so now they they can't locate upwards of 20 million vaccines, they don't know if they've been sent to the states and the whole process is a mess.

They inherited a mess and no vaccines, no, they inherited vaccines that were being distributed to the states for distribution, to hospitals and other facilities for distribution to patients.

They inherited everything. It's just that their screw ups. And Biden gave the impression. During his campaign from his basement that this was something that could be overcome if he would just wear a mask, just give him the levers of power, he'll make everything better. It'll be smoothly done. Efficiently done. We'll have a zillion vaccines for a zillion people.

And but because he's a fool, he's a liar. The left, they always lie about what they're capable of and what they're going to do.

They always tell you they give you the moon and then they wind up mooning you, Mr. Producer. That's where they are. Joe Biden is an incompetent boob. He was an incompetent boob even when he had his sanity. He didn't know how to deal with the SARS virus. And he doesn't know how to deal with this. He goes around firing everybody who actually figured out how to handle this, but the media want to help him desperately. They want to destroy Trump and they want to promote Biden, but we're on to them.

I'll be right back. My love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Armacost. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

He got the Zucker turd, I mean, Ferrick or whatever, Mark Zuckerberg, January 21 conference call recorded by Project Veritas.

We care deeply about Biden's executive orders, but Facebook has too much power, perhaps.

First you'll hear Zuckerberg, then you'll hear Nick Clegg, head of global affairs. Why does that name sound familiar to me? Anyway, Cottan go in his first day, President Bush already issued a number of executive orders, an area quite deeply about, but that's been quite a lot of disquiet expressed by many leaders around the world and the president of Mexico to an extent, but only in Russia and China, and saying, well, this shows that private companies have got too much power and they should be only making these decisions in a way that is framed by democratically agreed rules.

We agree with that. We agree with that. Want to be very clear about that. But ideally, we wouldn't be taking these decisions, although we would be taking these decisions in line with that, in conformity with democratically agreed rules and principles. And at the moment, those are not to be Democratic rivals don't exist.

We take decisions in real time when a rambling buffoon. So, Zuckerberg, you have to wonder, how did this guy become a multibillionaire? This guy doesn't even qualify. To run the fryer at Burger King, and there's nothing wrong with that. I said he doesn't qualify. That would be Zucker turd. In his first day, President Biden, the key is already issued a number of executive orders on areas that we as a company really care quite deeply about.

OK, so you see, Zuckerberg is part of the base, his company's part of the base. And these executive orders are quite radical, and Zuckerberg says, well, we like them as a company. Now, the fact that their executive orders are not legislation doesn't bother Zuckerberg at all.

He feels he's untouchable. He feels he's immune from the law and immune from public opinion. Now we get to listen to Roy Austin, vice president, civil rights and deputy general counsel at Facebook, I guess at the same discussion. First Guy Rose and vice president of integrity, both have a lot of vice presidents over there, don't they, Mr. Producer? Kind of let go.

We have a system that is able to freeze commenting on threads in cases where systems are detecting that there may be a threat that has hate speech or violence in the comments. These are all things we've built over the past three or four years as part of our investments into the integrity space, our efforts to protect elections.

You know, you know, listen, listen to the arrogance, the condescension and the idiocy. Investments into the integrity space or efforts to protect elections, to protect elections. Ladies and gentlemen, this is about free speech. It's not about protecting elections or protecting Democrats or protecting anything. This is about free speech, but you just heard. From this clown. Guy Rosen, vice president of integrity now, guy, how can be vice president integrity if you have none?

In my humble opinion and we don't need. Just look how they talk like their.

Their weird part of our investments into the integrity, space or efforts to protect elections, so he's going to protect our elections, you know, from you and me.

Now we get to hear from Roy Austin CO whether or not we can use oculist to help a white police officer understand what it feels like to be a young black man whose tall and searched and arrested by the police that I want every major decision to run through a civil rights laws, that he wants every major decision to be run through a civil rights lens.

Let me tell you that phraseology.

I've been studying this hard hits very close to this critical race theory where they want every decision run through a racial lens.

That's what he's trying to say. Roy Austin. This is why you're having problems with Facebook. Now, Zuckerberg, go where we're all important and positive steps, and I am looking forward to opportunities where Facebook is going to be able to work together with this new administration on some of their top priorities, starting with the correct response.

There you have it. There you have it, the emperor has no clothes and a stupid haircut. They look forward to working with the Biden administration on a number of their priorities, including the Koven response, so they're all in with Biden.

They're going to protect Biden. They're all in with critical race theory and identity politics. But so are The Washington Post and The New York Times and CNN and MSNBC and all the other reprobates. I'll be right back. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk.

AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. EMAC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us.

We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Armacost. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

You're listening to Dunolly. It's a great one, the great one, and you can call it now, eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Representative Elise Stefanik is really a terrific representative. I don't know all her politics and political views and all, but when I watch her, she's sharp, she's solid, she's principled.

So it's nice to have you on the program. How are you? Great to be with you, Mark.

Well, you're coming under a lot of attack these days, so you know that better than anybody at Harvard at the Times Union of Albany, ABC News Matthew Dowd, what are they saying about you and why do you think they're doing this?

Well, they're attacking me because I'm standing up for my constituents and the Constitution. This is nothing new. Republicans and conservatives have faced the endless attacks, especially over the past four years as there was growing grassroots and voter support for President Trump. And the attacks really started against me when I stood up for the truth, the Constitution, the American people and the president during the sham impeachment hearings a year ago, the first impeachment under Adam Schiff, the regime of secrecy.

Now I'm being attacked by Harvard, where I actually graduated from as an undergrad. And I always joke and tell my constituents that's not the achievement graduating from Harvard. The achievement is staying a conservative. But because I objected to the Electoral College votes in four states, they chose to kick me off the board of the supposed bipartisan Institute of Politics. Now, it is not a bipartisan board. It is now 100 percent made up of Joe Biden voters. So it's more of the same that we're seeing of carnival culture on our college campuses.

And it really is an attack on the student body and academic freedom. But I will always stand up for my constituents, my district and the Constitution.

And I want to thank you for that. It is amazing what's going on, the amount of repression in this country right now and the attack on speech by these these organizations that effectively are surrogates of the left and the government. And you have newspapers that are actually cheering this on.

I mean, you have CNN, which is some of their hosts, or at least one of them, is demanding that these cable companies take Fox off the air.

And you have a newspaper in Albany that was particularly outrageous. They let this leftist in this pro-abortion guy write a piece basically trashing you and your husband. Correct. That is correct. This was really gutter politics. My husband and I were a young married couple and I was 30 years old when I was first elected to the United States Congress as the youngest woman ever elected. We have not been blessed with children. We hope to be blessed with children. And they allowed someone under their masthead to attack us as childless.

Now, imagine if that attack happened against a liberal Democratic member of Congress. It would be on every single network news for weeks on end. We called out the paper. They quietly took it down. They have yet to apologize. But this is the double standard that we see every single day in the media when it comes to how they treat conservative women versus how they treat liberal women.

It is amazing. I mean, you don't have to support Sarah Palin. I did. But they talk about the first woman vice president. And so they didn't want the first woman vice president when her name was Sarah Palin. They didn't want the second black Supreme Court justice when his name was Clarence Thomas.

They what they're talking about is liberal women, liberal minorities. That's really what they're pushing for. ABC News, you have this guy, Matthew Dowd, who's sort of a Republican reprobate, or at least he was a Republican. And he says you're an example why you shouldn't just elect women or millennials to Congress. What do you what do you make of that? Well, my dad had to apologize very quickly, and ABC News should have removed him as the political editor or whatever his position is, the good news is, Mark, it's meaningless when you talk to voters.

When I talk to my constituents, they're focused on my job representing them in Congress. They don't pay attention to these never Trump tweets from people like Matt Dowd, but that they did have to apologize. And it's just growing out of touch with the American people and how frustrated they are with the chattering cocktail class that's in the Beltway. Again, I'm voted into office by my constituents, not by elites who spend their entire days on Twitter. And I'm very grateful for the support for all of my district.

Now, let's talk about some of this. You have a president who is signing executive orders like he's a king. He's these aren't these aren't executive orders simply aimed at reversing what President Trump that these are substantive pieces of legislation that they call executive orders, one after another after another. He barely takes any questions from anybody unless it's all scripted.

He's going around Congress and that is violating the separation of powers. You have the the president of the United States also apparently has no problem with open borders, stops the wall. He has the power to stop a pipeline in the middle of it being constructed, even though it has nothing to do with pollution. The opposite, because obviously, you know, trucks and trains and more accidents and the potential for pollution, he he's pushing with this covid bill.

Fifteen dollars minimum wage now they have fifteen dollars minimum wage and a lot of metropolitan areas, but a lot of suburban areas in rural areas, they do not and they simply can't afford it. Are these little businesses are going to go under and so forth. What do you make of this imperial presidency?

Well, I think President Biden holds the record and on his first day in office, he issued more executive orders by far than any other previous president, Democrat or Republican. This is because they have to appease the far left this march towards socialism when it comes to the Keystone XL pipeline decision that on day one destroys thousands and thousands of good paying jobs, particularly in a very challenging economy, as we work to beat covid. In addition to stopping the construction of the border wall, there historically has been bipartisan support for increased border security.

It's only become recently that the siren song of the left has been open borders. That is not where the American people are on these issues. And I also think the American people are waking up to the media just fawning day after day over President Biden and Vice President Harris, whereas we just had four years of the media opposing and really, really undermining the Trump presidency, not focusing on their questions or the results that this administration, previous administration worked to deliver.

So I think we're going to see more of one party rule from the left and from this administration. But I think that gives Republicans an opportunity as we head into 2022 that will be similar to the way we saw in 2010. Here's my concern, their agenda.

I talked about in this first hour of this show, their agenda is intended almost exclusively to empower the Democrat Party, H.R. one. All those changes are intended to make the Democrat Party a permanent majority party, as they did in California, as they try to do in New York.

The changes in the Senate, which they hope to make again, intended to empower the Democrat Party, the changes that they want to make to the courts, again, intended to empower the Democrat Party's agenda, get rid of the filibuster if they could empower the Democrat Party's agenda. In other words, it seems to be party empowerment first and country second.

How do you see this? I agree with you.

I think the Democratic Party is putting their party first over governing for the American people. You know, Joe Biden and the administration can give as much lip service as they want to being bipartisan. Yet every action that they've taken since he was sworn into office has been empowering the Democratic Party and not reaching out to Republicans. I know today he invited those 10 Republican senators, but immediately they put out a statement criticizing the proposal that the Republican senators put out regarding a more balanced covid relief bill rather than a one point nine trillion dollar wish list, which you said included.

And you're correct, a 15 dollar minimum wage which would devastate economies in rural America that are suffering already because during the covid pandemic. So I do think this is about coalescing further power. You can look. No. Rather than New York state, we see it every single day with the worst governor in America, Governor Cuomo. It is about the Democratic Party over the people of New York. And I think we're seeing that trend at the national level with President Biden.

And look at the schools. I mean, Biden and his chief of staff basically back. The teachers union, because they provide two point two million precinct workers now, I saw a study over the years, about 30, 35 percent of the teachers are Republican, but the vast majority are not and the vast majority are rather left and the leadership is radical left. And so this is why they oppose school choice, you know, big civil rights issue. As far as I'm concerned.

You talk about equality or equity and and also he doesn't want to turn off the TV. In fact, in that covid-19 bill, correct me if I'm wrong, there's there's like a quarter of a billion dollars for the for the schools. They already passed like 70 billion. And most of them are closed. Yes, we actually have passed, as you said, upwards of 70 billion dollars in previous covid packages directly to school districts. I'm very proud in school districts, in my district, our teachers have done a tremendous job making sure that students can learn in person.

And it was interesting when they surveyed parents, most school districts, over 90 percent of parents said they want their kids learning in school. They saw during the remote learning last year that you had very concerning statistics. Kids were not getting the academic rigor that they deserve. You saw increases in child abuse cases. You saw increases in neglect. You saw increases in students who completely were no longer in touch with the school district or parents that did not respond to the school district.

Our kids need to be in school. And I think it's a travesty that the administration is siding with the teachers union in Chicago and not the students. We should be focusing on our students and young people to make sure that they get access to the best education, because this is going to have a lasting effect. You know, you learn so much at every grade level, every month of school to continue your academic pathway towards success. So I really credit those parents who are speaking out on behalf of their students because we know the unions are prioritizing the students tell us and I'm not familiar, your district includes what towns?

So my district I represent the north country in New York. It's 40 percent of the geography of New York State. It is north of Albany. It starts in Saratoga County. It goes up to the Canadian border and then it goes to Watertown. So I have almost all of the Adirondacks. It's very rural and I have some suburbs, but I spend a lot of time traveling the district, meeting with constituents in small towns and villages throughout the Adirondacks.

Well, I don't think they could do better with a representative than you, if I may say so. Just looking from afar.

And I want to wish you all the best of luck. Oh, thank you, Mark, thanks for the opportunity to allow me to talk about the north country. You got it. God bless and take care of yourself. You do think there is a young person, a young lady, you can tell. Very classy, very articulate, very intelligent. Who's a conservative? So they try to destroy her. Who opposed impeachment and was one of the most effective people fighting it in Congress.

So they got to take her out. She raised serious questions about those four battleground states that we have raised here over and over purely on constitutional grounds, and she's right.

We're right, I'm right.

And for this, again, they have to try to destroy her. This is Marxism. They don't want debate. They don't want ideas, they want power. I've told you that for years. That's what it's all about, power.

You're going to hear other people repeating now. And you know what? I hope they do.

I hope they do what I discussed at length during the first hour and in other occasions.

That everything the Democrat Party is doing now, whether it's Biden's executive orders, whether it's Schumer's legislative agenda, is all aimed at empowering the Democrat Party, delivering for its base, empowering the base, weakening the Republican base, dispersing the Republican base, punishing the Republican base, but most of all, empowering the Democrat Party, because in these Marxist or neo Marxist regimes, it's the party that comes first. And the Democrat Party has become a neo Marxist European type party.

And so, as I said earlier in the program, we we are faced with a president who conducts himself like a monarch and they want iron fisted central control over society.

And yet simultaneously, we're faced with mob rule in the Congress.

Because they are not going to abide by traditions, they are not going to abide by customs, and they're not going to abide by the four corners of the Constitution. In fact, their target is the Constitution. It stands in the way of their of their obsessive desire. To control you, but she's a breath of fresh air, I'll be right back to my love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk.

AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us.

We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amax US. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join AMOC instead a C U.S..

There is a scandal at the Lincoln Project, 21 men have accused one of their founders, John Weaver, a long time rhino who advised John McCain and John Kasich of making sexual overtures, overtures to young men, including a 14 year old.

Now, the question is this, and of course, they backed Biden, just say, you know, and back the Democrats. The question is this. Did the other founders of the Lincoln Project know anything about this? I think a nice big lawsuit needs to be fired into that organization like a torpedo. And every one of these reprobates needs to be deposed. What did they know, if anything? And when did they know it? If ever? That's what needs to happen.

That's what needs to happen. We were sent over The New York Times, overt sexual solicitations to at least 10 of the men in a most explicit messages offer professional personal assistance in exchange for sex. So I don't know how the Lincoln Project ducks this. I mean, Duck's a lawsuit not saying they're guilty, of course, I'm saying there needs to be discovery and there should be discovery. Why discovery? Have everybody who founded that entity and everybody associated to that entity, and if they didn't know it's kind of strange, why wouldn't they know why?

Because we've kept it secret from us. So there was no inkling of it. I mean, you're talking about score plus one, that's a lot of people and more may come forward. Of these men, Anthony Kovel, 22, said Mr. Weaver began messaging him on July 20 19, that exchange exchange petered out, if you will. But on December three, 2019, two weeks before the Lincoln Project was publicly announced, Mr. Weaver invited him to join the new initiative.

Mr. Weaver suggested that Mr. Kovel post a thirst trap or send me a picked. And asked him to call for more details on the project. Wow, quite an operation, that link project, Mr. Producer, don't you think? I don't think that project can get away with not being drawn into this. For instance, if I'm a lawyer for one of these these individuals, I want all texts, emails, communications, documents of any kind, the Lincoln Project, among other things, just to find out what, if anything, took place there.

We salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters and emergency personnel. I want to thank you, America. God bless each and every one of you. And I'll see you tomorrow. From the Westwood One podcast network.