The assassination of President John F. Kennedy is the greatest murder mystery in American history.

That's Rob Reiner. Rob called me.

Soledad O'Brien, and asked me what I knew about this crime. We'll ask who had the motive to assassinate a sitting president. Then we'll pull the curtain back on the cover up.

The American people need to know the truth.

Listen to Who Killed JFK? On the iHeart.

Radio app.

Apple podcasts.

Or wherever you get your podcasts. On one side were the cowboys, a band of ranchers turned criminals who had plagued the town for years. On the other, four lawmen, and their names are the ones you'd recognize, Virgil, Morgan, and Wyatt Earp, alongside.

Their good friend, Doc Holladay.

The resulting shootout, known today as the gunfight at the OK Corral, only lasted 30 seconds, but the market left on popular imagination has held on for nearly 150 years. Why? Because Americans have never stopped being fascinated with the Wild West. This July, Grim and Mild presents, turns its gaze westward. Join us for a trek into the unknown, the misunderstood, and the forgotten tales of America's Westwood expansion. So pack your assumptions and childhood love of the unexplored and get ready to make a journey. Grim and Mild presents The Wild West is available now. Subscribe on the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Learn more at grimandmild. Com/presents. Cue Josh Trumpet. You know what that means, everybody? We are going back on tour again. We are hitting the road next year in January for our annual Pacific Northwest in Northern California swing. We will be at the Paramount Theater in Seattle on January 24th, Revolution Hall in Portland on the 25th, and our home away from home at San Francisco Sketchfest on January 26th.

Yeah, we'll be at the Sydney Goldstein Theater again, everybody.

A great place.

That's right. If you want tickets and information, you can go to linktree/sysk, and it's got all that jam. You can go to our website, stuffyshidknow. Com. It's got all that jam. We will see all of you guys in January with bells on. Welcome to.

Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeart Radio.

Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck, and Jerry's here, too. This is the We'll Get Through it edition of Stuff You Should Know about the periodic table.

I have other.

Names for it. I bet you do. Can you say any of them?

This is the only time I Hate My Job edition. Now we can stop talking about the Sun episode.

Maybe.

Edition. My God, why do we ever do episodes on Chemistry edition? I failed Chemistry. It's the only thing I've ever failed was Chemistry.

I don't think I even ever took Chemistry, to tell you the truth.

You didn't fail it.

Right. You can't fail if you don't try. That's my motto. Here's what I figured out about this, like driving myself mad, trying to learn this stuff and understand it. There is a lot of people out there who have written articles and explainers on the stuff that we're going to talk about who literally don't know what they're talking about, and yet they're presenting their information like they do. It's wrong and you can't understand it. Or in cases where you can understand it, it still doesn't fully answer the question. There's a lot of stuff out there like that on this, especially as it gets more and more like arcane, right?

Yeah.

There's a whole group of people out there, chemists, molecular chemists, physicists who understand this, but you can put them all together and they can't coherently explain any of it to anybody else. They can just talk to one another like this. Where we are, where us and everybody listening to this episode right now is stuck in the middle. We know enough that we can notice when somebody is wrong or not correct or doesn't know what they're talking about, but we don't know enough to understand what the actual scientists are saying and then come back and explain it. First of all, Bretton, cap off to Olivia for helping us with this one.

Boy, Olivia should get a bonus for this one, quite frankly. For sure.

We might have to edit that out. We'll have to check the budget. Secondly, we're smart enough to get all this across. We are. But we're also transparent enough to admit when we're like, We don't understand this part.

Yeah, I mean, there's a few parts I still don't get. The good news is I imagine that maybe about 20% of our listenership is even hearing this right now.

I hope more than that because it's really interesting stuff.

Would you click on something called How the Periodic Table works?

Well, we're going to have to come up with something else. I think we'll call this one legs, legs, legs.

Colon, tiny lettering, periodic table. Exactly. The sex episode.

Right. Yeah. We'll see. We'll trick them into listening to it.

All right. I know I can get some of this at the beginning, so if you'll allow me to talk about one of the only parts I understand.

Sure.

All right, great. I'll kick it off. Because we have to set the stage for pre-periodic table construction, which is to say that early... I'm sorry, late in the 18th century, we were working from... Science was working from the Aristotlean, Aristotlean? Yeah, that's to say, Aristotle system, which we've talked about some recently, which is, hey, we got four elements: fire, earth, water, and air. And then after that, science became a little more nuanced, and they're like, hey, actually, we think there are more things out there, more building blocks, and maybe we can distinguish them from one another and categorize them maybe based on their mass. This was the scene when in 1804, an oddly an English school teacher who was also a researcher named John Dalton said, All right, things are made up of smaller things, which is not new. For ancient cultures, we're even talking about things being up of smaller things.

Yeah, we talked about democratus in that episode about things we believed before the scientific method.

Totally. That's exactly where it was. But he said things are made up maybe of these little tiny indestructible, indivisible atoms. He got a lot of that wrong. But one thing he got right was the idea that no two elements that we know about so far, which were not very many at all at that point, can have an identical mass, and all the atoms of that element have the same mass, which also wasn't quite right. But at the time, it was right.

Yeah, because you got to give it up to these guys. When we're analyzing elements and atoms and stuff today, we're using spectrometry and particle accelerators and doing all sorts of amazing stuff. These guys are burning things.

This is 1804.

Boiling them in acid. They were doing all the stuff that a high school chemistry teacher does to demonstrate chemistry. That's what they were doing to actually isolate elements and weigh them. They were weighing things like oxygen. They figured out that if you take a liter of oxygen, you will find that it weighs 1.5 grams. No matter where in the world you weigh it, it's going to weigh 1.5 grams. That's what these people were doing. Can you capture a liter of oxygen? I can't. I can't. What they were doing was the hardcore bloody roll-up-your-sleeves chemistry. Apparently, it was one of the biggest scientific pushes of the 19th century was identifying elements. John Dalton was the first to say, Hey, some of these, I think we can try to organize them a little bit. Dalton didn't discover any elements from what I understand. He was just the first one to come up with atomic theory in the modern age and try to start ordering them based on atomic weight.

Yeah, exactly. It wasn't quite the periodic table yet, but it was a precursor for sure. And his very first version in 1803 only had the five elements that we knew about at the time: hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur. Nitrogen was known as, I think we said this in the other episode, the Azote? Or is it a zote?

I guess.

Okay, A-Z-O-T-E. His second list, just five years later, was up to 20 elements, and then 24 years later, by 1827, that list was up to 36. And as science was progressing, they started noticing patterns and they started noticing intervals where things would repeat themselves such that all of a sudden, a German chemist named Johan Wolfgang in 1829 said, Well, wait a minute. We're noticing these patterns. And some of these things are the same. Like if you look at lithium, sodium, potassium, they have very similar properties. And we might can group those together. And those three in the modern periodic table are grouped together in the same column. So he was right on the money as far as that idea.

Yeah. We, as humans, are obsessed with finding patterns in things and discovering a latent pattern in nature, I mean, there's a few things more exciting than that. These guys were looking for patterns even in places where they didn't necessarily exist, maybe maneuvering things where they should or shouldn't be. Some people took some cracks at it to try to organize these elements by pattern, but they ran into some problems. One was the chemistry wasn't as exact as it needed to be to really organize stuff. There were elements that hadn't been discovered yet, so there big missing chunks, but they didn't necessarily know there were big missing chunks, but they were on the right track that you could order these things one way or another. When you did, they would start showing patterns, periodicity. Periodic table means that there are periods or patterns that repeat themselves depending on how you organize these elements.

Yeah. The modern periodic table that we know and.

Loath.

Sorry, I loath, that thing that they pull down in science class that teenagers just blankly stare at, not knowing what the heck they're looking at.

But it's pretty.

Sure, if you say so. We owe that to a Russian chemist named Dmitri Mendalev. Mendalev, in 1869, was working on the very first Russian language organic chemistry textbook in 1869 and said, You know what? We have 63 elements at this point. I think we can organize these. And he did so. He arranged things in columns. He had to reorder some things from the previous order. So he's like, Maybe we shouldn't organize just by atomic mass. Maybe we should order them into these similarities and how they behave. And the big, big thing that Mendalev landed on was leaving gaps where he saw gaps. And instead of just buttoning it up and making it look a certain way, he said, I'm going to leave a gap here. And this is actually what proved his worth in the fact that he was really on the right track because in the 15 years following him leaving those gaps, three elements were discovered that fit those very gaps that he had left perfectly, like a little puzzle piece.

It's like the molecular chemistry version of Babe Ruth calling a shot. Yeah, basically. Essentially. So when it turned out in the next 15 years, they found those elements that did not only fill those spots, but they had properties that Mendilev predicted they would. They were like, You did really good, guy. He also predicted some other ones that didn't come true, but everybody was just like, Whatever, it's fine. That was the model that everybody used from that point on. It's the classic model that we see today where it's like a castle with turrets on either side and the brick in the middle and then there's a couple of rows below that are a moat if you squint hard enough.

That's.

Mendoliv who came up with that whole thing. The way that they're arranged is not by atomic mass, but by atomic number. That's why if you look, and we should probably say the way you read the periodic table is from left to right and top to bottom, right? So the whole thing starts in the top left with number one, hydrogen. And the reason it's number one is because it has one proton. It's the best. That's right. It has one proton, Chuck. And because it has one proton in its stable form, it has one electron. And all that's going to be important in a minute.

That's right. I mean, should we go ahead and take a break? I feel like that was good setup material. Sure. All right, we'll take a break and we'll be right back with more things to enlighten you and numb you.

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy is the greatest murder mystery in American history.

That's.

Rob.

Reiner. Rob called me.

Soledad O'Brien, and asked me what I knew about this crime. I know 60.

Years later, new leads are.

Still emerging.

To me, an award-winning journalist, that's the making of an incredible story.

On this podcast.

You're going to hear it told by one.

Of America's greatest storytellers. We'll ask who had the motive to assassinate.

A sitting president. My dad thought of JFK, screwed us.

At the Bay of Pigs, and then he screwed us after the Cuban missile crisis.

We'll reveal why.

Lee Harvey Oswalt isn't who they said he was. I was.

Under the impression that Lee was being.

Trained for a specific operation. Then we'll pull the curtain back on the cover up.

The American people need to know the truth.

Listen to Who Killed JFK on the iHeart.

Radio app, Apple.

Podcasts.

Or wherever you get your podcasts.

Join former 90210 star, Brian Austin-green, along with dancing with the star's fan favorite, Sharna Burgess, and Hollywood air-turned-life coach, Randy Spelling, as they navigate life, love, and the quest for happiness in the new podcast, Oldish.

Have I finally found the secret to happiness and the key to a successful relationship? Let's hope so.

Because most of that is with me.

Ryan, a father of five who's endured.

A public divorce and a string of unhealthy relationships, and Sharna, a self-proclaimed serial monogamous, have been in a.

Whirlwind romance since meeting in 2020.

Now they'll tackle the challenges.

Of blended family.

Life while dealing with relentless paparazzi. With the help of their friend Randy, they share their life lessons pondering the meaning of it all in the world of The Oldish.

And even though this Hollywood couple finally found each other, they don't have all the answers.

Hold on a second. Well, that's where I come in. I'm prepared to guide you, our listeners, through some.

Of life's funniest, awkward, or.

Difficult moments. Listen to Oldish on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm.

Marisa Fallberg. And I'm Steven Wolf-Bededa.

We.

Want to invite you to join us for a new podcast, Brand New. So what's actually new about Brand New?

Well, Steven and I are not only working C-suite executives, we're friends.

My friend, Maris, is actually one of the most influential chief marketing.

Officers in the world. Hey, Steven has a.

Story career.

Across finance, tech, and multicultural entertainment.

Because of that, we've got a lot to say about the world of tech.

Entertainment, advertising, media and.

Marketing, what we effectively call team. We always adore each other but.

Don't always agree with each other, and that's part of the fun. It's real talk from the inside, sometimes.

Personal talk too.

It's.

Meant for.

Everyone, rising in business or just interested in it. In each episode, we give our hot takes on hot topics and always answer what's on your minds too.

Just look for the brand new podcast on the iHeart podcast network or wherever.

You listen. It's a brand new conversation that you won't want to miss. All right, so the modern periodic table, I think, where was Mendilev? He had 63 on his first... Yeah, 63 known elements at the time on his first stab. The modern periodic table right now stands at 118, and I think they've already said they think possibly maybe one day it may top out at 1.73..

We'll see.

We'll see. But that's the thinking, the logic. But right now, we're at 118 elements that we know about. It includes, on the chart the name of the element. They're usually a one or two-letter symbol, which is almost always short for the name. But in a case of gold, like when you see AU for gold and you're like, What the heck is that all about? That just means it's based on the original Latin for gold, arm. And they are placed, like you said, before the break in order of their atomic number, which represents the protons in each atom. And that is what makes that each element unique over those seven rows, aka periods, and 18 numbered columns, aka groups.

Yeah. So the rows across horizontally, those are the periods. Like you said, it's really important to remember, if you take a proton and add it to an element, you don't have a variation on the element. You have an entirely new element. Everything else you can mess around with fudge, mess with the neutrons, mess with the electrons. If you add a proton or take away a proton, you got a totally different element, which is why you can order them by their atomic number. Number one, with hydrogen. Number two, helium, which has two protons and so on and so forth. When you see that little number in the top left of the square for that element, that's how many protons it has. But again, as we'll see, if we're talking about on the periodic table, stable atoms, that means that they don't have an electric charge, they're neutral. That means that they have an even number of protons and electrons. Protons are positively charged, electrons are negatively charged. If you have one and one, they cancel each other up. Two and two, they cancel each other up. Or at the very least, they make the electric charge neutral.

All right. So if you brought up a picture by now of the periodic table because you really want to follow along-.

Yeah, that's a good idea. First of.

All, God bless you for doing such a thing. And secondly, you might say, Well, wait a minute, Chuck. What's that thing underneath everything? We'll get to this in a minute. But those 14 short columns underneath is called the F block. And those are the seventh and eighth periods, aka rows, that are detached and those are unnumbered rows, whereas the other rows are numbered through 18. So put a pin in the F block. All elements within a period, and again, that is the row if you're looking horizontal, all the elements on each row have the same number of electron shells. And when you think about that in your mind's eye, you're probably picturing how we think of that in our mind's eye because of chemistry class and science class, which is a circle around an atom's nucleus that holds electrons.

Right, like an orbit. That's Neil's Boar's contribution. Although he made plenty of contributions, but the whole idea that we have of the atom being consisting of a nucleus that's like the sun and electrons orbiting around it like planets, that's thanks to Niel's boar. And the actual orbit, let's say you have just one circle around the nucleus, that's a shell. It's one shell. Add another one, that's the second shell. At another one, that's the third shell, and they actually fill up in order. So when you follow along across the rows, the horizontal rows called periods on the periodic table, all of those in that row have the same number of shells. One shell and the second shell and the third shell and the fourth shell. And as you go down, each row has all of the shells that the ones above it had, and now they've added another shell because their other shells are full of electrons.

Right. So if you look at periodic table, get out your little picture, and you look at that first row or period, that means it just has one shell capable of holding up to two electrons. And so that's why there are only two elements there: hydrogen usually has one electron, and helium, which normally has two. And then you go down from there, the second and third shells can hold up to eight electrons. Those second and third rows are each going to have eight elements and so on. For the fourth and fifth, it's 18. The sixth and seventh hold 32. And so there are 32 elements on the sixth and seventh rows.

Just to demonstrate a little further, so helium has two electrons in that one shell, helium is full. The first element on the next row that has the second shell, that's lithium. Lithium has two electrons in its first shell, that's full, but it has an extra electron. So now it's added another shell, the second shell to house that first electron. You go all the way down to the very end of that row that lithium starts and you find neon. Neon has 10. Its first shell of two is full of electrons. Its second shell, that can hold up to eight, is full. So it has 10 total electrons. This is what the periods are showing us, the number of shells. And then eventually, in a second, we'll know the number of electrons that can fill those shells.

That's right. And the periods of the rows. We're going to say that a thousand times: groups or columns, periods or rows, because if there's one takeaway from this whole thing, you can at least look smart. And when you walk into a room with a periodic table chart and someone says, What are those rows and columns? And you can say, Do you mean groups and periods?

Yeah. And then really quickly after that, look at your watch and be like, Look at the time. I'm late, and run out of the room so that there's no follow-up questions.

Yeah, and make a U-shaped hole in the wall. Not the letter U, but a Y-O-U-shaped.

Yeah, nice.

Did that come through?

Sure. It did once you spelled it. Okay.

The groups are what we're going to talk about next, and those are the columns. This is where Mendilev realized these patterns were coming into play. Once subatomic theory came about and we started being able to drill down further and further, we started to be able to get way more specific. These patterns and these rhythms on the columns are based on the number of valence electrons for each element, which means how many electrons you would normally find in that outermost shell.

Yeah, the outermost shell is important, Chuck, because that's where all the action happens. That's when atoms bond together to make new molecules. That's where the attraction or repulsion happens. That's the active shell. All the other shells are full. When a shell is full, it's basically content. It just wants to sit there. It wants to be left alone. But if that outermost shell isn't full, then it's ready for some action. It's got its leather jacket on, it's got its dice in its pocket, maybe a switch blade, and it's looking for trouble. Yeah. So more than, I think, even rows, like all of the elements that are in a row, remember, horizontal across a period, they're related because they all have the same shell, the same number of shells, 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on. The groups up and down the columns, they're more related, really, because they have the same number of electrons in that outermost shell. They can have a bunch of different numbers of shells. For example, I think fluorine can have five shells, but only one electron in that outermost shell. Or it could have one shell and just have one electron in that outermost shell like a hydrogen.

They're more related because they'll react to other things more than they would if they had different numbers of electrons.

Yeah, we can add something to something you should remember, because this will make you look even one step smarter before you run out of the room through the wall. Just say, Oh, yeah, it's organized into periods and groups and the periods of the rows and the groups of the columns. And if you ask me, the columns, aka groups, that's really where it's at.

They're more related.

They're more related. And then you run through the wall.

Right. So let me give you an example here, okay?

All right, this is if you want to really, really, really be smart, you just remember this. Right.

If you have your periodic table out, really, honestly, it will make this whole thing so much easier. But if you look all the way down to the second group from the right that starts with fluorine, if you look at fluorine, it has, I think, nine electrons, and it's in period two. We know that it has two shells. We know that it has two electrons in its first shell. It must have seven electrons in its extra shell, that are its second shell. Since we know that the second shell can hold eight, there's one little irritating gap and it wants to fill it. So fluorine is super duper reactive. On the other hand, you've got things like potassium. It has only one electron in its ourmost shell. And it wants to actually get rid of that electron because I think I said earlier, when a shell is full, the atom is content and happy. It doesn't want to do anything with anybody. If it just has one leftover, like one hole or one electron, it either wants to get rid of that one electron so that it can lose that shell and go down to the next shell, which is full, or it can fill its shell like fluorine wants to with an extra electron.

Either way, they're super reactive. It all happens in that outermost shell, the valent shell, and that's where all the action happens.

Yeah, and you know what? Something we haven't even said that I think is important that dawned on me is the periodic table isn't just a like, Let's just do this thing so we can group them together. The periodic table is made and it's organized this way. So chemists and people that really know what they're doing can look at a poster on a wall at any of those squares and know because of where it is on the row, where it is on the column, what color it is, and what block it is. And we'll get to those things in a minute. And they can know a lot of very specific things just because of where it sits and what it looks like and what.

Color it is. Yeah, they can tell you whether it's going to blow up in water, like I guess, apparently sodium, pure sodium does. They can tell you if it's shiny. All of this has to do almost entirely with the number of electrons it has in its outermost shell, all that stuff. That's the evolution of the periodic table. People noticed properties, physical properties, they noticed appearance, stuff like that. And then as they learned more and more about the atom, they figured out why in the atom those properties existed, and they were able to classify those things together in the periodic table. Like you said, a chemist today can look at that and be like, Oh, that's going to be a shiny metal that'll explode in your hand if you look at it wrong because it's in this group of elements. I saw it described by a chemist really well. To a chemist, a periodic table looks like a map to us. If you look at a map of the United States, you know that if you are looking at some place in the north, it's going to be colder there than, say, somewhere in the south.

You don't know exactly what the temperature is or anything like that necessarily, but you know generally based on this map, it's a map to the elements.

Yeah, and it also might... You might think if you're looking at a map of the south, that's where people are more like this. In the Midwest, people may be... A map tells you a lot more than just what the weather's like, just like a periodic table. So if a scientist, if a chemist looks at Silicon, I look at it and I see a capital S, lowercase I, the word Silicon, the number 14 in the left-hand corner, and that it's yellow. A chemist looks at it and says, Well, I see it's in between on the row, aluminum and phosphorus, and in the column, it's below carbon and above germium. And I see its number is 14 and it's yellow, which means it's a metalloid. So I can tell you these 12 things about silicon just because of where it sits on that map. Yes. It's pretty amazing. I don't get it, but it's amazing.

Right. I was just going to say we're not going to explain what those 14 things are because they're the things you have to go to graduate school in chemistry to truly understand. It's okay that we don't understand it. All you have to take away from this, and all we're trying to get across is that trained chemists can look at the periodic table and realize a lot about whatever element they're looking at and figure out how to mix it with other elements to do amazing things, or if you put together these two things, this is probably the reaction that you're going to have.

Yeah, and it's also for someone like us, it can get really confusing because when you look at different periodic tables, one thing you'll notice is that the colors may be different. There is no, unless I'm wrong, there isn't one completely settled, this is the only way to do it, periodic table. Oh, no. As far as a lot of it goes, but depending on who you are and how you want to organize the periodic table that you use, those colors may mean different things. So it can get really, really confusing when it comes to that stuff.

For sure. And usually there is a key or a legend on the periodic table that says this is what these colors mean. But if you take away the colors, the layout of them across and down, if you look at a periodic table, it's generally going to be the same for any periodic table that looks even roughly like what you're looking at. It's the colors that really change things up. But more and more, as we've learned more about the atom starting in the early 20th century onward, and quantum mechanics became a thing, that got incorporated into the periodic table as well. And that is where we get to essentially the third way that the whole thing's organized, which is by blocks, subshells, S, P, D, and F. And so- Take it away. The number of shells that an element has, that's its period across, the number of electrons in its outermost shell, that's its group.

The.

Blocks describe where that outermost electron is. And if you'll allow me for a second to just take a little divergence here. It helps you understand it, I think.

Please, can we talk about baseball?

No, not that divergence. It's like deeper into chemistry divergence.

Okay, I'm going to go out and think.

About baseball. Okay, so that whole model that Niels Boar gave us of the planetary nucleus or the sun-like nucleus and the planetary electron orbiting it, that is really off. That's not at all what they're like. It's good for people who don't really care about this thing to walk around thinking, but when you actually start to try to understand the periodic table, it really gets in the way. If you can throw that out and instead think of electrons as not particles like planetoids, they're actually waves of energy. They like to orbit atoms because their negative electrical charge is attracted to the positive electrical charge of the protons. That's why they're orbiting or flying around that nucleus. But they don't do it in these tight little orbits like a planet does around the sun. Instead, they inhabit three-dimensional areas that follow predictable shapes depending on the energy level of that electron. You can say what shape it's going to follow around that nucleus, but you can't say where it is at any given point in time. Thanks to our friend Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Heisenberg said, You can know the velocity of an object or you can know the location of a quantum object.

You can't know both. Because we know the energy of an object, we can figure out its velocity, its speed, like an electron, which means we can't know where it is. These orbits actually are where they may be 90% of the time. That's what an actual electron orbit is. Again, it follows these weird, cool-looking little three-dimensional, four-leaf, clover shapes, just really neat. Depending on the energy of the electron, it's going to inhabit a specific place 90% of the time around the nucleus of that atom, either close to the atom, further out, further out, depending on the shell that it's associated with. The block is where the highest energy, the outermost electron, is in that position. Again, it's denoted by S, P, D, and F. It gets way more arcane than that. But all you have to remember is that when you're looking at blocks, they're talking about the specific location of the most energetic electron. Again, since the outermost electrons are where all the action happens, the most energetic of the outermost electrons are really where the action happens. And that's why it's become a little more sophisticated, a little more refined over time, thanks to the addition of quantum mechanics in our understanding of the atom.

Are you there, Chuck? Did you.

Go outside? Sorry, I just came back in. I didn't actually think about baseball. I was just kidding. I watched an entire.

Baseball game. Oh, who won?

I have no joke. My brain is too mushy for a joke right now. No, I actually listen to that and I learned from you.

So I appreciate that. Oh, wow. Thank you, because I felt like I was hanging from a trapeze by my fingernails.

Well, I was underneath you with a net. That's all I'm.

Good for. Thanks, buddy. I appreciate it. And by the way, I didn't want to just walk past that's all you're good for. I just couldn't even bring myself to recognize such a dumb thing that was said.

I appreciate that. So the final thing we got to talk about is brings it back to the beginning of how they originally just started to think about grouping things, which was by their atomic mass, the very basic thing that they first thought they could use as a grouping device. And they still will indicate the atomic mass on most periodic tables, but the atomic mass is actually a weighted average of the amount of protons plus neutrons, but it depends on how abundant different isotopes in that element are out in nature, and it's not always the same. So carbon is a great example that Olivia used. It always has six protons, usually has six neutrons, but sometimes can have seven or eight. So instead of having an atomic mass of just 12, 6 plus 6, they take a weighted average and it weighs out to 12.011. So if you see those numbers with a decimal point, you can understand that that's because it's a weighted average and not just a locked-in number.

Yeah, and just it doesn't necessarily have much to do with the periodic table, but you mentioned isotopes and all those are as an element with more or less electrons than it has when it's stable in a neutral charge. If you take away an electron, it has more positively charged protons than electrons. So that's a positive ion. If you add an electron, like say, fluorine wants to do, it has more electrons than protons, so it becomes a negatively-charged isotope. Those are possible too. But just bear in mind, you're not changing the number of protons because if you do that, you have a new element. You're just changing the number of electrons, either adding or taking away. One of the other things about the periodic table is you can point to different sections and be like, those are the ones that form positive ions because they give away their extra electron. Those are the ones that form negative ions because they attract extra electrons than they normally have in their neutrally charged state. That's another thing that you can just point to at the periodic table.

Pretty amazing. It is.

I mean, the fact that people have figured this out is just hats off to all of the scientists that were involved in this over the years. Yeah.

I say.

We take a break. Sure.

When we come back, we're going to tell you about how things got very interesting in terms of the periodic table in the 1930s, right after this.

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy is the greatest murder mystery in American history.

That's Rob Reiner. Rob called me.

Soledad O'Brien, and asked me what I knew about this crime. I know 60.

Years later, new leads are.

Still emerging.

To me, an award-winning journalist, that's the making of an incredible story.

On this podcast.

You're going to hear it told by one.

Of America's greatest storytellers. We'll ask who had the motive to assassinate.

A sitting president. My dad thought JFK.

Screwed us at the Bay of Pigs, and then he screwed us after the Cuban missile crisis.

We'll reveal why.

Lee Harvey Oswalt isn't who they said he was. I was.

Under the impression that Lee.

Was.

Being.

Trained for a specific operation. Then we'll pull the curtain back on the cover up.

The American people.

Need to know the truth. Listen to Who Killed JFK on the iHeart Radio app.

Apple.

Podcast.

Or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, everybody, it's your boy, Michael Cahre, a world famous, often talked about alleged comedian. Some of you all know me as Mr. Whittaker from Martin. Some of you know me as Show Boat from House Party Three. Yes, I have toed Jim Crackers for everybody, and some of you don't know me at all. But you can come find out who I am on my new podcast called Michael talks to everybody. That's right, the game I own show you all. Michael talks to everybody where every week we'll be interviewing some of the greatest artists in the game. Also, we'll be talking to ordinary people.

With extraordinary ideas.

It's going to be off the chain. We're going to be covering all sorts of topics you ain't heard of nowhere else. We're going to be doing a lot of laugh and a lot of talking. Most importantly, we're going to have a lot of fun. It's going to be off the chain. Please check us out. Everybody, I'm telling you, it's crazy. It's bananas. It's Michael talks to everybody. I'm talking about everybody. We got TI, we got Michael Jackson. He's going to be just come back. He's just going to be here for a minute. Everybody, we're going to be talking to him. We're going to be talking on this show. Listen to Michael talks to everybody on December fifth on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, I'm Marisa Fallberg.

And I'm Steven Wolf-Bededa.

We.

Want to invite you to join us for a new podcast, Brand New. What's actually new about Brand New?

Well, Steven and I are not only working C-suite executives, we're friends.

My friend Marisa is actually one of the most influential chief marketing.

Officers in the world. Hey, Steven, has a.

Story career.

Across finance, tech, and multicultural entertainment.

Because of that, we've got a lot to say about the world of tech.

Entertainment, advertising, media, and marketing.

What we effectively call team. We always adore each other but don't always.

Agree with each other, and that's part of the fun. It's real talk from the inside, sometimes.

Personal talk too. It's meant for.

Everyone, rising in business or just interested in it. In each episode, we give our hot takes on hot topics and always answer what's on your minds too.

Just look for the brand new podcast on the iHeart Podcast Network.

Or wherever you listen. It's a brand new conversation that you won't want to miss.

Chuck, I feel like we made it through the hardest part. We're out of the woods.

I'm shaking a little less.

I am, too.

But I won't fully relax for another 10-15 minutes.

Just hang in there. Hang in there. We'll get it.

All right. What happened in the 1930s?

Oh, well, a guy named Dr. Lawrence, I can't remember, but the Lawrence Livermore laboratory is named after him in part, invented particle accelerators where you use incredible amounts of energy to throw trillions of particles of different weights or specific weights at a target atom. Tell them how Einstein described this process.

Like shooting birds in the dark in a country where there are only a few birds. Right.

The chances of you actually having a collision are so remote that they're almost indescribable mathematically. But if you shoot trillions of particles, you really increase your chances of there being some collision. And when you collide one particle, one atom with another atom with enough energy, they can combine. When you add proton to proton, remember, you get a new element. With particle accelerators, they were able to start creating elements that you can't find in nature. They started doing this all the way back in the 1930s. This research is what actually directly led to nuclear bomb. Apparently, when Einstein heard that Lawrence had created this particle accelerator, he advised FDR to start working on a bomb because it was now a thing. Like the world had just been prepared scientifically for a bomb to exist soon.

Yeah. Lab created elements, like you said, started being a thing in 1937. Anything past uranium on the chart, you cannot find in nature because it decays much too fast to even be around and know it's a thing and study. Anything past uranium is lab created. And in 1937, technetium was the very first blank spot to be filled in with a lab-creative element as number 43. Nuclear bombs that you mentioned when they started doing the nuclear tests out on the Marshall Islands in the 50s, they would send planes out into these explosions with filters on them to scoop up unusual atoms and discover potentially elements. That is how we got Element 99 named Einsteinium. And I guess we should talk a little bit about the naming because the IU PAC actually has rules around this that says new elements have to be named after a, and this is very interesting, a mineral, a place or a country, a property or a scientist or a mythological concept, which is fascinating. So we have some of the latest elements, I believe, in 2016 is when we got 113-18. We got the element, Tennessee, because they were institutions in Tennessee that led to the discovery of this super heavy element.

And so they named it Tennessee. And most of them follow that naming convention.

Yeah, Nihonium is named after Nihon, which is the Japanese name for Japan. The Muscovian is named after Moscow, the lab where that was created in Oganison. -oganison? -yeah. -oganison? -yeah. -oganison. That's what it is. It's named after a guy named Uri Oganesian, who is a Russian essentially element hunter now. He has got tons of funding behind him, has set up new particle accelerators with more and more energy, and is bashing things together in the search for entirely new elements that not only don't exist on Earth, they may not exist anywhere else in the universe. They may only exist theoretically until Oganesian manages to smash the right atoms together to create those elements for a picosecond. They're so unstable that they last almost no time at all, which makes them totally useless to us.

Yeah, as of now.

The fact that, like you said, they predicted, I think it's going to go up to 173 and we're at a 100 in what?

Eighteen.

Makes people like Ognesian just crazy. They want to find them all. He actually found a couple of those most recent ones that were inducted, I guess, in the periodic table in 2016.

Yeah. This is cool, too. Ognesian apparently wanted to name that element Stardust in honor of David Bowie, but it didn't fit the naming criteria.

Oh, yeah?

Yeah.

Too bad. So sad.

Yeah, too bad. So as far as the quota on this, and, Olivia, is keen to point out that there are gaps in the framework still. There are issues when you look at the periodic table. You needn't only look at the very first one, hydrogen at the far left of the table. It's there because it has that one electron. But it is not like any of the rest of its group because the rest of them are all alkali metals. It's actually more similar to something like chlorine, which is in the second column from the right. But there's still debate on it. It's not settled on where things should be placed on these various... And there are alternative tables that people have put out over the years with different tweaks, some small, some large. And it's pretty interesting, I think.

And there's also that two-period section that's always removed from the rest of the periodic table and is put down below it, those two sections actually go.

In- That's the F block, right?

Yeah, the bottom two rows. They come after, I think, barium and just go all the way over to... Oh, I can't remember the other one. But imagine that the periodic table looked like it did, but then the bottom two rows were about twice as long as they are now. It'd look weird. It's because you would take that lower F block and put it into its proper place if you're arranging these things by atomic number. But the reason why the F block is pulled out is because those two rows of elements, the actinides and lathinides, I think, they might follow an atomic number in that way, but their properties are totally different from their periods or their groups. The reason why is because they're the only two groups that have the F-position subshell filled by an electron, which completely alters their everything. It's just different than all of the other ones. And it's different enough that they just basically removed it until they can figure out where it should sit. Because depending on how you interpret how the periodic table should be laid out, they should go here, they should go there, or they should just stay out like they are now.

Yeah, and it's fun to look some of these up if you want to see some cool, at the very least, just esthetic examples. And then they're not just like, Oh, this looks cooler. It makes sense to the person who has put out this whatever alternative or alternate periodic table. In 1949, Olivia found one from Life magazine that is a spiral, and there are quite a few different spiral or spirillic designs where you have hydrogen at the center, and it's like racetrack shape. If you look at any, just look at spiral-based periodic chart, and they're very nice to look at. I imagine they're much, much harder to make sense of and read unless you're the person who made it.

Or a chemist.

Yeah, chemists would still probably be like, Well, why are you doing it that way?

I liked it the other way.

Or that 3D one that Timothy Stowe came up with that I think are pretty keen on that has three axes of different colors that represent quantum numbers that describe the electrons. But if you look at a 3D version, that's cool, too. But if you find the traditional one confusing, as a non-chemist, just try looking at any of these other ones. It's really confusing.

Yeah. And all it is, is it's saying, Well, actually, no, I think we should arrange them so that they're connected more by this property, like electronegativity or they're shiny or they're pretty. I like these elements, and so we're going to put them together. These are my favorite elements. It's just like that. You can bend them in all sorts of weird shapes.

Yeah, I have my own periodic table I've designed.

Oh, yeah?

It is just a big black-black block, and then Times New Roman and yellow lettering in the middle that says, Who gives a S?

I would have imagined it was a traditional periodic table, but scratched out with a pen almost violently.

Yeah. No, that's good. I like that better. I'm going to.

Change mine. I've got one other thing that has a lot to do with everything, but not anything we're going to go into. But there are some, especially those elements that don't occur in nature and they have to create in particle accelerators, but also some that occur in nature, like gold and mercury are two good examples. They have electrons that spin so fast that are moving at such incredible energies that they actually are a significant fraction of the speed of light. That's how fast they're going. It doesn't matter whether you're talking about a photon or a planet or a black hole or an electron, anything that has mass and can move at anything half the speed of light is going to actually bend time and space. For some kinds of elements that have relativistic speeds, meaning their electrons travel close to the speed of light, they have all sorts of freaky-dicky properties. It's why gold is gold. I'm not going to get into that. Just trust me, it's why gold is gold. But also it means that if you could go into those atoms and just exist in them as if they were a universe, you would see that time and space was bent compared to how time and space exists outside of those atoms on our level.

That's what atomic scientists have figured out. It's actually having a mind-breaking effect on the periodic table to an extent. Amazing. I think so, too. That's it, Chuck. We did periodic tables. It's done. You did great.

Oh, boy.

We don't have to do it again? No, I don't think so. God, I hope not. Okay, good. Yeah. What is this? Murphy's Law? Well, since I said Murphy's Law and Chuck laughed because he got the joke, you may not have them, that's okay. That means it's time for Listener Mail.

All right, I'm going to call this a very quick follow-up from our Halloween episode. As we record this, it is actually Halloween. That has just come out today, and we have something from Owen that perhaps explains something that we wondered about. Hey, guys. Once again, loving the yearly spooktacular, figured I'd mention my take on what the hermit meant. Hermit? Hermit meant, when he said, The man's eyes didn't match his mouth. I think it might have something to do with honesty. The words of encouragement were somehow disingenuous. That lined up with the idea that the hermit is seeing flaws and faults. That makes sense to me. I just didn't match his mouth.

That's the best explanation I've heard so far. It's also the only explanation, but it's a good one.

I think that's totally it. Owen says, Regardless of whether that's the author's intent, I'm using the description in a song I'm writing. Oh, cool. Thanks for the inspiration. In all honesty, the voice work is on point this year. That is from Owen.

Thanks a lot, Owen. Here's some inspiration for the musical part of your song. Oh, no.

If you want to be like Owen and write in to explain something to us, we love that thing. You can put it in an email and send it off to stuffpodcast@ihartradio. Com.

Stuff you should know is a production of iHeart Radio. For more podcasts like MyHeart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app. Apple podcasts are wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy is the greatest murder mystery in American history.

That's Rob Reiner. Rob called me.

Soledad O'Brien, and asked me what I knew about this crime. We'll ask who had the motive to assassinate a sitting president. Then we'll pull the curtain back on the cover up.

The American people need to know the truth.

Listen to Who Killed JFK on the iHeart Radio app.

Apple.

Podcasts.

Or wherever you get your podcasts.

Hi, I'm Marisa Thahlberg. I'm Steven Wolf-Pedata. Come join.

Us for our.

Podcast brand new.

What's really new.

About brand new?

Well, Steven and I are not only longtime C-suite.

Executives, we're friends. Because of that, we've got a lot to say.

About tech, entertainment, advertising, media.

And marketing, what we call team.

It's real talk from the inside, personal talk too, and it's meant for everyone rising in business or just interested.

In it. Just look for the brand new podcast wherever you listen. It's a.

Brand new conversation you won't want to miss. Hello, beautiful people. I'm Saeeda.

Garrett, award-winning singer, songwriter, and passionate knitter. Now, host.

Of the Uppity Knitter Podcast, Celebrity Hobbies Uncovered. I'll be spilling the tea on the hidden talents of your.

Favorite.

Stars. Tune in to the Uppity.

Knitter Podcast.

Celebrity Hobbies Uncovered with me, Saeeda Garrett, for a stitch of inspiration and pearls of laughter. Subscribe now on the iHeart Radio app and Apple Podcast or wherever you get.

Your podcasts.