Coming up, three NBA teams in trouble. Surprisingly, the Knicks are not one of them. Next. We're also brought to you by the Ringer podcast Network. We have an awesome four-day college basketball extravaganza starting Friday night with the women's final four. Tate Frazier covering all of it on one shiny podcast with Jay Kyle Man. Niffy Kyle sneaks in there as well. I hope you're checking out that podcast. Hope you're checking out the Ringer wrestling show because we have a two-day wrestle this weekend as well. Yeah, that's happening, too. So it is an awesome weekend, plus all the basketball stuff, all the seeds that are on play. I am going to be doing some women's boost with FanDuel. Stay tuned on my Twitter because they usually tell me what they can do. Then we do it the day of. So stay tuned for that. Stay tuned for the next rewatchables coming Monday night. We're doing War of the Roses for Rock Bottom. Bet you weren't expecting that choice. Yeah, War of the Roses. It's a good one. Michael Douglas Kathleen Turner. One of the great marriage movies, one of the great marriage gone wrong movies, maybe the marriage gone wrong movie.

Anyway, that has happened on Monday night. Eventually, they'll be able to watch it on youtube. Com/bilsimmons, where I post stuff from the rewatchables from this podcast, shorter videos, longer videos, some walk and talks, and you can check it out. Okay, coming up. I'm going to do something at the top about three NBA teams in trouble plus the digs trade and what it means not just for Buffalo, but for the wide receiver mini pyramid. We're going to hit that at the top. Then I want to talk about the Knicks because Julius Randall got knocked out for the season officially today, although they did win after we tape the segment that we did with Howard Beck and Sean Fennessey, and then the Knicks one. So maybe we jinked a win out of it. But we want to see what's going on at the Knicks, where is this going long term? And then Sean left and Howard stayed, and we talked about a bunch of NBA stuff. So that's the podcast tonight. It's a good one. First, our friends from ProJet. I'm going to open up a six-pack here on Thursday. We do three basketball and three football.

We'll start with basketball. I noticed that there were some really good NBA games today. I was watching all them at the same time, and I realized that there are three NBA teams that are in trouble as we headed to the final 10 days of the season. Ironically, all of them played tonight. First one, man, I hesitate doing this. I know what it means. As you know, nobody is more afraid of the Michael Myers Miami heat than I am. They're hitting, are we sure they're a good territory for me? Especially watching tonight, a game that felt super winnable for them against Philly, against... They're still trying to work and beat in. It just felt like one of those games Miami was going to steal in the last two minutes. They're like, There they go again. They did it. Well, they didn't steal it. They're 8-8 in their last 16. They're 12th in net rating. If you look at some of their offensive stats, the offense is the thing I really want to hit here because they're 19th in three pointers made. They're 13 in free throw attempts. They're 20th in assists per game. They're 21st in offensive rating.

They're 24th in rebounding. There's just a lot of evidence now in full season that this team is not very good offensively. Then you look at Butler, who last year he had 24 games where he scored more than 25 points. This year, he has 13 games where he scored more than 25 points. Out of 53, he's just not as explosive as he was in previous years. The thing that we've learned with Miami is up. They're playing possum, don't trust them. They have this other gear. They have this on/off button. I'm not really sure what the on/off button is for them because, first of all, they're 18 and 25 now against above 500 teams, which is the worst record of anyone in the top eight in either conference. If you just look at the talent they have, Bam, Butler, Duncan Robinson, Rozier, Caleb Barton, Love, Hy Smith, Jowich, and then Hero when he comes back, All of a sudden, there's an incredible amount of pressure on Hero to be the three-point shooter/scorer creator that this team really desperately needs, but we haven't seen him forever. They're just going to throw him back right before the playoff start.

I don't know. I don't think they're in a great spot, especially if they fall into that 7-8 and they have to play Philadelphia. Then if they end up in the 1-8 versus Boston, potentially, and they'll say, Oh, we played great against Boston. This is a different Boston team. They have way more size than they did in previous years. They've been, statistically, one of the seven or eight best regular season teams of all time. I just wonder if Miami is coasting here on reputation. We see this happen in football all the time, where there's this football team. We're like, Oh, no, no. Every year, they're here. We did this last year with the Chiefs. We're waiting the infrastructure. The difference is the heat have never won a title, and they made the finals twice in four years, and maybe that's the ceiling of this group. I'm still afraid of them. I still feel like they're the Michael Myers heat, but sometimes you are who you are, and the league is really good now. Maybe the version of the heat from the last few years when you put them in this year's league, they don't have that extra step that can go up.

Rozier, probably better than last year's guards. Hero, a wrinkle they didn't have in the playoffs. But man, you go back, just go back on basketball reference and just look at Jimmy's games against Milwaukee. Maybe that was just A Black Swan event. Anyway, Miami, I think they're in a little bit of trouble. I think we can officially say it. Now I know that I'm going to have my voice cut into all kinds of hype videos for Miami. Great. Next team, Sacramento. I am way more sure about this. Sacramento, actually, if you go to the 18 playoff teams, they have to be probably closer to the Chicago-Atlanta level than anybody else. They lost Herder for the year who wasn't even playing that good, but it was at least somebody that they know can trust a little bit in big games. They lost Malik Monk at least through round one, and this is the one you really feel when you watch them. They're basically Fox and bonus and a bunch of guys. There's nobody special on this team other than those two. If you go through, the team that they have now, their three through nine guys, are in the running for worst three through nine crew out of anybody who's going to be in the playoffs.

Post All-Star rate in their 25th, it looks like they're going to fall to the nine seed, which would put them against their nemesis, Golden State, the team that they haven't been able to beat for a million years. By the way, this is a huge break for Golden State. Golden State gets pushed by Houston. They fight it off. They beat them tonight. They killed them. So they finally killed that little demon that was over their shoulder. And now they're going to play 9-10. And they thought it was going to be the Lakers, but the Lakers are now moving up the ladder. And thank God, because I'm going to hit my to a boost for the four straight time dating back to 2022 in football and basketball. Thank you. Congratulations to me. But it's going to be Golden State, Sacramento. And then the hope for them would be that Los Angeles would beat New Orleans. And the path to Golden State to actually make the playoffs would be, can we win in Sacramento and can we win in New Orleans? The way that team's playing with how Wiggins has come back and all of a sudden looks invigorated again with the new roles that I think have really helped Draymon, there's no question.

Draymon has been unleashed with the new rules. It's like if they put hitting over the middle back in the NFL, there would be certain safeties that would be really helped. The question for me is, can they get Steph fresh for those two playing games? They're playing Dallas on Friday night. We'll see. They have such a big lead now with the 10 seed. Maybe they can rest Steph a couple of times before they get to the playing games. But how much can they get from him? Anyway, I think Sacramento is the worst West team out of the 10. If it It was them versus Houston for the 10 seed, I don't even know who I would take in that one. I think I would... Sacramento is a cross off to me. Sorry, I'm going to unlight the beam. Then my third team that's in trouble just actually had a big win tonight against Denver at home, which If you really unpealed it, it was a nice win, but I wouldn't be telling my grandkids about it, the Clippers. Before tonight, before they beat Denver by two, they were 13 and 13 in their last 26 games.

They were 19th in net rating, minus 2.1 win. 28th in defensive rating over that time. If you've listened to any basketball podcast over the last couple of weeks, everybody's been talking about the same thing. What the hell happened in this team? Are they packing in? They showed Ty Lou. Ty Lou did an interview today, and I swear his hair has turned white, Obama, second term style just over the last two months. But they stopped playing defense for just long, long stretches of the post All-Star break. Today, they were actually flying around a little bit, especially in the fourth quarter. But Harden has not been the same with the new rules. He's really not been the same the last couple of months. I test-wise, it's all the James Harden stuff you're worried about when they made the trade. I'm the guy who did the YouTube clip called The Clippers are Dumb after they traded for James Harden. Then I felt like an idiot because they were probably the third best team in the league for about six weeks there. But they followed them back to the pack. I know, again, I get it. They won tonight.

They barely beat Denver without Jamal Murray. There was multiple calls that went against the Nuggets to the point that their coach was like, I know this is a national TV game. I know we're fighting for a number one seed, but I'm going to get kicked out anyway because these referees are so bad. So that happened. Aaron Gordon, right when the Nuggets, it felt like they were going to tie the game. He does a Euro step and just collapses and falls out of bounds. They miss free throws. Zubats hit six straight free throws out of nowhere. The Clippers, every time it felt like they were going to get a dagger shot, they didn't get it. And the Nuggets had the the end. Their coach forgets to call time out. They lose three seconds. Jokuj misses a buzzbeater at the end of the game. It was one of those we pulled it out wins for the Clippers, but it didn't really change how I feel about where they are, and where they are is here. I think they're going to be the five seed? Right now, they have a game and a half lead over Dallas with six games to play, but Dallas is on an absolute tear, and they're playing Golden State on Friday.

My guess is Golden State is going to rest some guys because they have the 10 seed pretty much locked up at this point. It's going to be Dallas versus the Clippers and the way Luka is playing versus the way the Clippers are playing. Luka has definitely gone up, and he's already been great, but he's now the second best player in the league. I just don't see the Clippers beating them in a series. The way they're playing, the way they're playing defense, I don't see it. Yeah, they won tonight. But long term, I just don't like what I've seen the last two months. They've looked lethargic to me. I don't love their homecourt advantage to begin with, and their arrow is pointing down. I would have them as my third team that's in trouble. If it's going to be Clippers Dallas in the 4-5 with the winner getting Denver, Denver is going to be rooting for the Clippers. I know the Clippers beat them tonight, but I think Denver is going to be rooting to see them because I think that is a nice match up for them when Mario comes back. Anyway, those are my three.

Maybe I'm still in it with my The Clippers are Dumb YouTube clip. I was at one point, probably in February, 10 to 1 odds. That was going to make me look like a fool, but now it's probably down to plus 140 on a fan deal. Anyway, we're going to take a quick break and then come back with the NFL part of the six-pack right after this. Fandil is putting the ball on your court for the rest of the NBA season. Right now, new customers get $200 in bonus bets with any winning $500 bet. That is $200 if your bet wins. For instance, maybe you decided over the last couple of days that the Warriors are actually going to make the playoffs, not just the playing game. The playoffs, Sacramento is dropping a nine, probably. Warriors could beat them. Maybe they beat the loser of Lakers versus whoever in the seven, eight. All of a sudden, there they are, the Warriors in the playoffs. What are the odds? Look Friday morning. Go check that out. Bet on the NBA with a wide range of bet types, including quick bets, live same game parlays, player props and more.

And by the way, the wait is over, North Carolina. Fanduel, officially live in Tarheel State. So visit fanduel. Com/bs. Make your first bet a layup. Fanduel, official sportsbook partner of the NBA. You must be 21 plus and President. Select State's game problem. Call 1-800 Gambler. Visit rg-help. Com. First online real money wager only, $10 first deposit required. Bonus issued as down with drawable bonus bets that expire seven days after receipt seat terms at sportsbook. Fanduel. Com. All right, flipping of football for the last three things on the six-pack. Before we get to the digs trade, my number four in the six-pack, Robert Salah. I mentioned this the other day in a pod, and I just wanted to dive into this for a second because the Jets made that Hassan Redik trade, and they were all in. But they're not all in because Robert Salah is still their head coach. When I looked this up, as you know, I called him Seven Kids Salah during the season because he has seven kids. I wouldn't trust somebody with seven kids to... I'm trying to think how high of a level I'd want to go in Could you do Junior College?

I did three. I don't know. I just seven kids is a lot. I could barely handle two. Anyway, they're pot committed. They're all in. Robert Salah is 18 and 33 in his career. He's got a 353 winning percentage. I said to myself, That seems low. Looked it up on Pro Football Reference. There are 201 coaches that qualified that had to have coached at least 50 games and qualified from a win percentage standpoint to pop up on whatever thing I searched. Robert Salah is 182. There's only 19 coaches in the history of the league with a lower winning percentage than him. I'm just going to read you the names. You tell me if any of them sound awesome. Dan Henning. Dennis Allen, the Saints Coach. Yeah. Yeah, he watched the Saints last couple of years. Not great. John McKay, the only person in this group to win playoff games. Mike Nolan, the guy in the Niners, he used to... He tried to bring back the suits, and they were like, Cool, you're fired. Bill McPeek, can't remember him. Harland Svar, who coached for seven years. I honestly don't know who that was. Darryl Rogers, who coached in the '80s, he was terrible.

Marion Campbell, Joe Buhgel, 24 and 56, Dave McGinnis, Pat Schirmer, Jimmy Phalen, the immortal David Shula, Don Shula's son. This is my favorite. Usually, we only have nepotism with NFL owners and NFL GMs. We actually had it with an NFL coach, David Shula, and he finished 14, 19 and 52. Gus Bradley, Steve Spagnolo is the third worst head coach of all time. Over 50 games, 11 and 41. And then it gets really great. Number 200, Hugh Jackson. He was 11 and 44 with one tie, a 0.205 winning percentage. And then last but not least, Bert Bell, who in the late '30s and early '40s 10, 46, and 2. That's the company Robert Saul is in right now. I bring this up because if you're in win now mode, just bring in Mike Vrabel right now. You're in win now mode. You just traded your second-round pick in a year to get a pass rusher. You've got Rodgers, you traded picks for him. You have the 10th pick in the drafter and win that. Is there a person on the earth who doesn't think Mike Vrabel is a better coach than Robert Salas? Is there a person on the Earth?

Does he exist? If you're going to win now, why not get the best possible coach? I'm not saying they should hire Belichick, although that wouldn't be a bad idea either. But I just can't believe they're going to be win now, win now, win now. Oh, and here's Robert Salah, our head coach. Oh, and here's Nat Hackett, our offensive coordinator. Win now? No, thanks. All right, the digs trade. I did a lot of stuff on this. This is the classic, It's time for you to go trade, where they didn't care that his dead cap for for this year was 31 million, even though his figure would have been 34.3. So they basically saved 3.3 million on the cap just to get rid of him. They got a second round pick in a year. They had to put in a couple of lower round picks in the trade. And they do the trade and everybody immediately thinks they're way worse. And their odds on FanDuel for the AFCs was plus 115, jumped to plus 160 because they traded Diggs. And I watch football all the time. I watch it every Sunday. I talk about it with Sal on Sundays.

I talk about it on this podcast on Tuesdays and Thursdays. I didn't think Diggs was very good last year. In fact, I went and looked it up. In the last eight regular-season games, 37 catches for 349 yards in eight games. So he didn't even average 45 yards a game. One TD over his last eight regular season games. In the playoffs, 10 catches for 73 yards. That's pretty good for one game. Unfortunately, that was two payoff games, no touch downs. I just don't think he was impactful at all. And what was really happening was in the second half of the season, the team moved over to James Cook, and he became one of the three or four best runningbacks in the league. All of a sudden, it was Kincaid and James Cook, and Allen was spreading around, Allen using his legs. They changed their identity a little bit, and they didn't really miss Diggs that much, although I think they missed him a little bit in the KC game. When I see trades like this and I see the reaction, and the initial reaction is, Oh, my God, they traded Stefan Diggs. They're going to be way worse.

Who are Josh Allen's weapons? It's like, Are they going to be worse? Usually, I'm on the other side with Buffalo where I'm always like, Wait, I don't think they're as good as people are talking about. Now, Buffalo's defense is worse. They lost some guys. They lost guys all over the place. Their offense is going to be a little more bullpen by committee-ish, a little chiefs-ish, I still really like Cook, and I still really like Kincaid, and I'm just not sure that Diggs was as good as people seem to think he was. His last six playoff games over three years, he 27 catches for 289 yards. This is six games over three years, zero touch downs. He gets mentioned, and people seem to think he's a Tyreek or a CeeD Lam, and he's just not. I don't see it. Fine. If you're Austin, you got Stroud on a rookie deal. You're adding weight. Now you have three above-average receivers. Makes total sense. You're all in for this year and next year. I didn't think they gave up a ton. You're either getting him or Tee Higgins. But for Buffalo, I'm just not ready to cross off Buffalo yet, especially Miami is going to be worse, and they're about to do the all-time, oh, no contract with Tua.

The Jets, we just talked about Salah. Roger is coming off a torn Achilles. They're the Jets. Then the Pats clearly are doing nothing this year. To me, the division still runs through Josh Allen and Buffalo, which leads me to my wide receiver pyramid. I was trying to figure out. In my head, Diggs was not a top 15 receiver anymore, but I wanted to lay it out. I've been doing these mini pyramids. I did one on Sunday with Worst Owners with Ursillo. I did one on Monday on the rewatchables, Prison Movies. That was a fun one. My mini pyramid for this one, I'm going I'm going to bring in Steve Serruti, and if you're watching this on YouTube, you notice headphones magically popped on my head. As I said, I'm going to bring in Steve Serruti. I sent you my wide receiver mini pyramid, and the exercise was, Where's Diggs on this? I had Jefferson. If we're going to go top level is one player, second level is two players, third level is three players, and on. That's supposed to look like a pyramid. I had Justin Jefferson as my number one receiver. I had him at the top of the pyramid.

I floated this to a bunch of different people, and some people were like, Why not Tye Rik? I do think Tye Rik is the most impactful receiver we have, but he had a couple of weird games last year where he was hurt, then he come back, then he go out again, then he come back, and I just don't know what I'm getting from that guy sometimes. Whereas Jefferson, I just think if he's on the field and he has a decent QB, he's putting up giant numbers. Who would you have put first?

Jefferson. It's the injury thing with Tyreek. Yeah, Tyreek is probably the scariest weapon in the league. But if you're just saying fantasy draft, I could have one receiver to pair with my young quarterback or whatever quarterback I have to make him better. Jefferson just does everything. He was a little dinged up this year, so maybe that takes some shot off of him. But I just think Jefferson is the prototype of what you're looking for in the position, whereas Tyreek is more of a generational like, Oh, my God, what do I do with this guy? You have to fit him into whatever you're doing. Obviously, the two teams that he's been on have done that. But to me, Jefferson, I'm taking him one. And Tyreek's definitely two.

Jefferson's also way younger. Tyreek, it's like, how many more years at this level are we going to get from him? I have Tyreek as two. So the second level, Jefferson top level, Tyreek and CeeD Lamb. I think it's those three guys in some order as the top three. Ceed Lamb, to me, is the guaranteed number three. You're good with that, right?

I am. I try to talk myself, and I love Jamal Chase, and it was a weird season just because of the quarter burrows out. And he still put up decent numbers with Browning. But Lamb had such a stupid season. The numbers he put up, and he was always wide open for the Cowboys, that I think it surprised me a little bit. I always thought he was really good, but he was genuinely an elite top. You have him third here. So I don't have an issue with that. I think different seasons, you could say, yeah, maybe Jamal Chase comes back next year and is better. But I have no issue with Lam at three.

Third level, Chase number 4, St. Brown. And then I put Devante Adams as the third guy, so the sixth guy overall on this third level. Because even I didn't love the year he had last year, I think his quarterback situation the last couple of years has been abysmal. I still wonder, just give that guy a decent quarterback, what stats could he put up. To me, it's Chase St. Brown and Devante Adams He's 4, 5, 6 here.

Yeah. St. Brown is, again, over the middle, all the stuff that he does for golf. He's just the perfect safety blanket for a guy, for a quarterback. You have A. J. Brown in the next tier just down. I actually I would put A. J. Brown on this tier. I know he- So you'd put him over Adams?

I thought about it. I switched it back and forth. Would you put him over Adams or St. Brown?

I think he and St. Brown are the same guy. I think they're both awesome. I don't know that I'd want to rank one above. Yes, St. Brown had a better year last year. Team did better. Spotlight was a bit more. But A. J. Brown still had a good year last year, but not his greatest year. Maybe you're docking them a little bit there. But I just think those guys are so close that I have to put them right next to each other. If I have to knock one guy down- I think three spots.

It's a pyramid. I can't put four guys on level three. I can make it three.

You're asking me to put Devante Adams.

I think I would. You might talk me into this.

I think I would.

I put A. J. Brown, seventh as the first guy on the fourth level just because as to some of the whispers about the chemistry on that team last year. Something unseemly about whether he wanted the ball all the time or there was some diva stuff with him that I didn't know how to process. So that was it. I think talent-wise, he's in the top five. You could tell me we could flip him. Anyway, he's the first guy in this. Mike Evans. I have Pukha. We could argue about that in a second. Garrett Wilson and Ayuk. No Debo on this on this fourth level. Pukha is probably the one because he's only done it for one year. But I think, first of all, he was incredible in the playoff game, which really matters to me. But also, his blocking is unbelievable. He's probably the best blocker of all of these dudes, except maybe Debo. I don't know, that pushed over the top. Garrett Wilson, we've never seen him with a good quarterback, and I feel like he's going to be awesome at some point. You're shaking your head.

No, I love him. It's funny. When you put this ranking together, it's like You have to grade on a curve. Guys who have a really good quarterback play versus guys who play with duds. And he's had zero help throughout his entire career. I still watch Jets games, and he just stands out of the tape. The guy is just an insane athlete, catches everything, and does the most with the absolute least. Next year, if Rodgers is healthy, I think there's a chance that Gary Wilson will be closer to five than he is 10. I think he's that talented and that good. Obviously, you can't put him there now. I mean, there's a couple of guys lower on the list that we'll get to in a second. But some of the guys that just don't have quarterback play, it's hard to judge them because their stats aren't going to be the same. But if you put them on a Chief's team, a Ram's team, a Lion's team, I think they'd probably put up the same or maybe better stats than some of the guys we have here.

Yeah. So Larry Fitzgerald, Cora Larry. That five years when Larry Fitzgerald just had no quarterbacks at all, and we just felt bad for him every year. But you knew he was still awesome, but the stats didn't reflect it. Kevin Kahl. Yeah. You could have talked me into Gary Wilson in the sixth spot instead of Devante Adams, because I think he's that talented. But the fact that he's never done it, I think he had to get dogged on that. Then the other big controversial one for me, just trying to figure this out, was putting Ayuk over Debo, because I think most people feel like Debo is a better player. But for me, there's a durability piece with Debo. Mainly not his fault because the way the Niners use him, he just gets crushed five times a season. But I really value Ayuk. When his name was getting floated around as a possible trade guy, and maybe they can't afford him and maybe they're going to do to him what they did with Buckner, that when they traded Buckner and they drafted his replacement, basically, maybe they'll do that with Ayouk. I immediately was like, wow, if the Patriots could get Ayouk for their high second-round pick, I would do that in five seconds because I think that guy's awesome.

Debo, I wonder, is there a Marcus smart piece to him where the way his style of play, his body is going to start breaking down over the next couple of years? I'd rather have Ayouk.

Yeah, I'm not sure there's some cat hit you'd have to take on this, but if you're saying, I could have one guy going forward. I mean, Ayouk is the better receiver. That's just the way it is. And Debo, the way that his body is, can you maybe sucker somebody into trading for him? I still like Debo. I'd want him on my team, but he's one of It's like the heat. It's like Jimmy Butler. Just get me to the playoffs and hopefully you're healthy and you're fine. I don't really care about the regular season with Debo at all anymore. So if that's what you're doing, that's fine. Ayouk is a surprising guy because he's not flashy, but he runs great routes and he's always open.

That's the thing. He's always open, twice a game where you're like, Man, he got open again. How do you do it?

But do you ever worry about, this is where I get into the scheme stuff again, where you go, All right, yeah, he plays for an O'Shanahan offense, though. If you put him on the Panthers, and he's got Bryce Young throwing to him, do we still have him in the fourth tier here? I don't know. I don't think he's incredibly talented. I just see he's a really, really solid receiver.

Well, that's why I wonder if they have a receiver they love, either at the end of the first round or beginning of the second round, would they say, Yeah, instead of paying Ayuk, we can get a speed guy here that we really like, and we go? Anyway, so that's the fourth group. So now we're through 11 receivers. Yeah, 11. So this last group is six, which will bring us to 17 total. Debo. Cup, I didn't have initially. And then a couple of the... I sent this to the Ringer draft show guys, and they were like, Cup's got to be on. I was like, Well, Cup? Are we getting Cup ever again? It's like, Well, he's hurt last year. I just don't. Are we getting him again? So I'm just on reputation alone. I'm throwing him on there.

Probably not. And does it make you feel weird? All the Puka just came in in rookie year and basically did exactly what Cooper Cup did for three, four years. We're better barking. Again, I don't want to take it because the scheme thing is hard. Mcfay is an incredible guy, and I'm not taking anything away from Puka either. But that's clearly a roll to find out for those guys, and they're very good. But I don't know if that takes any shine off of Cooper Cup. Plus the health and the age thing. I don't know. I think it's fine to have him there. I wouldn't cry if he wasn't on the tier list, though.

Nico Collins, I had to put on because I think that guy is just a stud. Out of anybody on this last level, I think he's the guy with a chance to jump maybe two levels by the time the end of next season happens. Devante Smith, who is one of those guys you just don't understand why he's not one of the five best receivers in the league with some of the catches he makes. Weird team, weird situation. He's one of those rare ones where it's like, I'd actually rather see him on a bad team just having the ball thrown to him all the time. You're nodding.

I disagree.

Okay.

I think he and Jalen Waddle. I'd probably have Jalen Waddle in a similar ballpark that I would Devante. I think Devante I think Salon Water was basically- So you would bump Devante. I think once you get into this last year, so you haven't named the entire thing yet.

I think a lot of these- Oh, yeah. Go ahead. You're going to name it? Yeah. I had Debo Cup, Nico Collins. I feel good about all those three. Devante Smith, DJ Moore, and last but not least, Stefan Diggs, which was the whole point of this exercise. He just made it in there. So he squigged in in the last spot. I was switching him out, putting him back in, switching him out, and I ended up keeping him 17th. But from a salary cap standpoint, there's nine other guys I'd rather have. But if you're just talking about pure talent throwing salaries aside, I think he's probably still there, but I also think this is probably the last year he's there.

Probably. Then you don't have Keenan Allen in this. As I mentioned, you don't have Waddle. I don't. Higgins is out. Who else are we looking at?

Amari Cooper and Tankdell were the toughest cuts for me because Tankdell got hurt, and I feel like if he didn't get hurt, I don't know what happens to him in a good way down the stretch. Collins ended up getting a lot of the shine because Del was out, but I thought Dell was awesome.

Then DJ More, you can talk me into, he's the bad quarterback All-Star, and he still puts up these stupid stats. And last year, you're watching it, I think he was like sixth in yards or something like that, and playing with Justin Fields, who was inconsistent at best. You could actually talk me into him being higher on this list. I don't know. He's not one of those guys that jumps off the screen at you either, but I'm just like, if he's always being productive with these terrible quarterback situations, doesn't that tell you everything you need to know about how good this guy is as a wide receiver? It's like Keenan Allen, but with bad quarterback play.

So it sounds like we like 15 for sure. And then Devante and Diggs are at the tail end of this list, and then it becomes preference. If you're talking about who I think is going to bump some of these guys during the '24 season, I would definitely bet on Zay flowers. I would definitely bet on Addison on the Vikings, and I bet on Dell on Houston would be my three candidates.

The problem with Addison is who's their quarterback? He might just be a victim.

Are you kidding? It's going to be the next Tom braided, JJ McCarthy. We'll see. When they trade him to the chargers, they're going to trade 11 and 23 in a first to move up six spots. That's my prediction.

Higgins is another interesting one. If he ends up on, I don't know, the paths, panth, whatever team wants to trade for him, and he's playing with a a bad quarterback or a rookie quarterback, are we as excited about him as we were with Joe Burrow? I like him, but I don't know.

I like Tee Higgins, but he's one of those guys when you actually look at his stats, it doesn't match what's in your head with either fantasy or real life. He's never had 1,100 yards in a season. He's never had more than seven touch downs in a season. He's good, but I'm also like, you have Chase on the other side. You should have good stats. You have Burrow as your quarterback for most of that time. So I'd be interested to see- Even Boyd. Well, and what happens is that he goes to the Patriots and now he's the number one. The defense is moving toward him, and Jacobi Brisset is his quarterback. What stats is he putting up? The other interesting thing about the mini-pyramid here, we have Marvin Harrison. We have Tyreek Hill 2.0 coming out of LSU, and we have Thomas also coming out of LSU. And all three of those guys, I think, are better assets than some of the guys we've mentioned. I don't know if any of them are ready to vault into the mini pyramid right away. Do you think if you had to bet on one, who would you bet on?

Well, the disrespect to Roma Dunzé, who I think is my favorite receiver in this draft. Everybody likes neighbors. Oh, I put four.

My bad.

Yeah, no. Well, everybody likes neighbors because he's a track star, and he's like, Tyrie kill light, essentially. Harrison, he's going to walk in from day one being a top, probably definitely 20, 15 receiver. The question with him is just the ceiling. Is he ever going to Is he Jefferson or Lamb or Chase, or is he just going to be like, I don't know, Mike Evans, for example, which is fine. Mike Evans is great. He's obviously in your tier list. He's really good, but he's not the flashiest player, and I don't think he'd ever put him in the top five receivers. So that's the question. But I love Rome. Rome is 6'3. He's built like a tank. His route running could work on a little bit, but he's great with the ball after the catch. I think that guy at Washington... The weapons at Washington, you could argue, were better than some of the NFL teams. Probably better than your past last year. No question. That's one of the Michael Pennex. That's of the knocks against Michael Pennex. It's like, did he actually have... Were the weapons the deal? I don't know that it's necessarily true.

But I would say, Harrison is going to be a great player. Nabors depends on the team, but I like him. I think Rome, wherever he goes, I think he's being mocked to the Giants at a lot of places. He would step in from day one and be Obviously, their number one receiver. It's just like, who's throwing the ball? Again, the question we've been asking so far.

I have Diggs in this mini pyramid as the last guy, 17th overall. I don't feel in my head that he's the 17th best receiver asset when you lay all this stuff out. We'll see how he does on Houston. Again, it scares me that Buffalo's like, You need to go. That's never good. You always have to look at it from... In my AL Keeper League, my baseball league, the guy who's won for four straight years, Mike Mendelsohn. Two weeks before the draft, he's like, Hey, does anybody want a story? Ruiz, the A's speedster outfielder. We're like, Wow, you owe me $18. Why are you trading them? He's like, Anybody want them? So somebody trades for him, and he gets sent down four days into the season. We're like, What did Mike know? I feel the same way with Buffalo.

Insider trading.

Yeah. With Buffalo, they're like, Is anybody wants to find Diggs? Even though we're taking a huge cap hit. It's just suspicious.

It is. I mean, clearly, What is his brother's tweeting about how much he hates it there? He's questioning whether or not Josh Allen's actually going to be good without him, which I think you could argue that Josh Allen last year was better when they stopped throwing digs the ball. He had 13 straight games while at 100 yards. He had drops in the playoffs. I don't think he's terrible, but I think getting a second-round pick for him is pretty... My first reaction to this was, wow, a second-round pick is really high for a guy who's 30 and doesn't want to be there and has argued his way out of two different places. I don't know if you ever saw this. It was a couple of years ago. It was actually back when he was on the Vikings. There was some social media thing where one of the social media managers asked a bunch of different players, Hey, who's the guy on the team who you'd least want to date your daughter? And every single person says Stefan Diggs.

Oh, no.

That's not the biggest thing, but it's like you pencil that away. All right, so he's asked out of two places. That's the thing from the Vikings days. I don't know. There's just something there. But the thing is, he'll probably be on his best behavior because it's going to be an awesome situation in Houston. He's going to get a ton of balls his way, and maybe he's happy. But I thought it was weird that they basically avoided the last part of his contract, and he's essentially just now in a one-year deal. Pretty strange. For a second-round pick. That's a lot.

Thanks for doing the wide receiver mini-pyramid with me. Sorry about Sorry about all the pressure on your Orlando Magic, by the way, now that Randall's out for the air. We're going to talk about the Knicks next with Fentasee and Beck. We're taping this part before Knicks King's on Thursday night, the New York Knicks. In one way, it's a sad story because Julius Randall has been rolled out out for the year. On the other hand, a lot of good things have happened with the Knicks. They have shed the loser of the East, the sad sack of the New York sports scene. Some things have been shed. Sean Fentacy is here, Howard Beck is here. Fentacy, where are you now mentally? Just walk us through what you're thinking. Where are you?

Well, I'm sure you invited me here to say, why can't we have nice things? New York is cursed. Why are we so screwed? And so I'm happy to say, why can't we have nice things? Why are we so screwed? I genuinely don't know. Somebody reminded me of this in a New York sports text chain that I'm on, which you can imagine is one of the most cursed places imaginable.

Oh my God, that's the saddest chain in the Earth.

It's very painful.

Is there a psychiatrist on the chain?

Yeah. Is Dr. Murphy on that chain?

This is just a direct link to hell. It's like Satan is overseas. He started the chat. I don't know if it was Satan or someone else in the chat said, Every time someone or something comes along in this sphere of fandom that we have, invariably it gets scuttled. Think of Aaron Rodgers going down four plays into the season. Think of Brees Hall the season before that for the Jets getting injured in the first five games of the year. For the Knicks, it was this very obvious thing where we got this very little, very brief snapshot of what this team with Julius Randall, Jalen Brunson, Ogie Ananobi, Josh Hart, Mitchell Robinson, Isiah Hartenstein, and Dante DiVincenzo could be. We saw it for two games, three games after the Ogie acquisition. It looked like maybe a championship contending team. It's easy to say that because it's a small sample size. We don't really know what they were. But I remember I was watching the game when Randall got hurt and dislocated his shoulder, and you could tell immediately that it was a very bad injury, and it feels like something has been ripped away from us. Now all of a sudden, we're in what-if territory with the Knicks, which I guess is better than what-never.

It could be worse.

Well, you've had seven postseason appearances since the 2000 finals, and you've made the second round twice. So even the hope, I guess, Howard, if you're going to go spin a positive glass half full, they made a lot of good moves that worked. De Fincenzo, good signing. Jalen Brunson, the best signing of the decade. Isiah Hartenstein, probably the best bargain free agent signing of the last couple of years, they got him for under $10 million a year. The Josh Hartrade was good. The Ananobi Trade on paper, we can talk about his health stuff in a little bit, but that was a good move. For the most part, It looks like a train heading in the right direction. They didn't panic. They didn't do the, Oh, my God, where the Matt Ischby, a new owner syndrome move. They still have all their pics. The Celtics were probably winning the East no matter what happened with the talent they have, unless somebody gets hurt in the Celtics. So this probably wasn't there anyway, and they're still positioned for a whole bunch of good things. I would say this is positive. You're going to these games in New York.

Does it feel positive there? What's the vibe?

Haven't been in a couple of weeks. We'll be heading there when we finish finish up here today to see them play the Kings. But listen, the vibes, and Sean could correct me from the Knicks fan perspective if I'm wrong, I think the vibes are still generally positive. And even the Randall news today, you knew this was coming. You could see this coming. I don't know that anybody really expected he was going to be back. Will Ananobi be back for the playoffs? We'll see. But I think given everything that the Knicks as a franchise have been through and frankly, put themselves through, and that Knicks fans have been put through, I think you cannot look at this through any lens other than a positive one, because the injuries are the injuries. That's going to happen no matter what you do. I think as a baseline, anything that Knicks fans could truly ask for was just to operate like a normal competent team. And they've done that ever since Leon Rose took that job. And I will say outright, I was a bit skeptical, not because of anything to do with Leon, but just the fact that I'm always skeptical when someone comes in from the alternate route, right?

No No assistant GM, no basketball ops experience, period. But he hired a lot of really good people, people who did have a lot of front office experience. And they've just done the slow and steady thing. They've kept their picks. They've acquired picks. They haven't swung for the fences. They were in the Donovan Mitchell thing, but whatever. They pulled out or Utah pivoted, whatever it was, they didn't overpay to get Mitchell, which turns out to be the best move anyway, because he and Brunson, you and I, I think, agree on this, Bill. He and Brunson, I don't think we're ever going to be a good pairing. And so they've kept their powder dry. The Ananobi trade was a great move. Nix fans who are friends of mine, I was on text chains that day with people who were saying they were heartbroken because they love Emmanuel quickly, and they still had hopes for Barrett. But Ananobi launches them to one of their best. Tommy Beere, who's here in town, writes for a number of outlets, noted this on Twitter earlier that the January three-week stretch with Ananobi was the next best three-week stretch since L'Insanity.

Is that true?

I didn't look up the numbers. I think it was 12:1 or something. But arguably, the most exciting and the most optimistic, too, since then. I think whatever happens in the playoffs, and granted, at a certain point there within the last couple of months, I think, again, friends of mine who were Knicks fans were seeing like, Hey, if things break right, I think we can actually take the Celtics. And I was hearing this chatter. They were up for it. They were feeling like we got a bunch of chance.

We were a little concerned on the Celtic side, too. You were worried. Yeah, I was. It was the type of Miami Heat type of weird, gritty, tough team that I think would have given the Celtics problems.

Yeah. And now I don't think that that's in the cards for this postseason. But you got to take... It's easy for me to say as the non-fan, but you got to take the long view. And the long view should be, they are in a really great position to, even if they just got healthy and resign Ogie and Anobe, and just bring back the same group. They're going to feel like a year from now, they've got that same puncher's chance against Boston or whoever. But in the meantime, they still have all those assets, all those extra draft picks. And just they're in a great position to make the next move when they get the opportunity to. And in this league, that's all you can ask because you don't know when the next guy is available or when you can get him. You just got to put yourself in a position where you have the assets to go get the guy if he's available.

Well, they're going to have Randall at 30.3 next year coming off an injury and then 32.4 player option, which I'm guessing with how high the free agent caps space it. Next year might be his last year on this contract. So that part's interesting. And then Bogdanovic has just not been a great signing for them. I guess I should have been able to predict that Tibbs wouldn't totally love this guy because he's such a defense guy, but he has a team option at 19 next year, so they have some chips steps. Sean, let's say they traded everything and they got Donovan Mitchell next year. Are you excited about that or are you feeling like, Oh, my God, this is a classic mid-2000s Knicks move?

I don't think it would be that bad. I still think Donovan Mitchell's in his prime and is one of the most dynamic scores in the NBA. That stretch that the Cavs had earlier this year where he was carrying them was amazing. He's also just a died the wool New York guy who's basically desperately wanted to be on the Knicks, and there's a homecoming thing that hopefully doesn't too closely mirror the Carmelo thing. I'm the biggest Carmelo hater skeptic around, and I'm a little nervous about that, but I'm also enticed by it. I just have the same concerns that I think any reasonable person does about putting Mitchell and Brunson in the same backcourt and just feeling like even with a strategically aligned Tibbs defense, whether or not those two can survive together. And nobody wants to mess with Brunson. I mean, Brunson is, he is already the most legendary and beloved Nix since Patrick Ewing. There's just no question about it. I mean, he is, I genuinely think like a demigod to Nick's fans right now. I love watching him play. Everyone feels very emotionally connected to him. So the idea of messing with that somehow or they're like, him, pairing him with someone who reveals more of his weaknesses or whatever that might lead to makes you feel complicated.

But they have to do something because they The offense that they're missing without Randall is so apparent on a night-to-night basis. Dante DiVincenzo being their leading scorer in six of the last 10 games, they're 16 and 14 since Randall got hurt. There's just no way around that. They are missing him. I have been flummoxed by Julius Randall since he got here. He's really hard to root for. He plays hard, and he is obviously very gifted, but his energy and his meltdowns at the wrong times, especially at the close of games, drive fans nuts. But they're just missing something without him. So whether it's him coming back in full health or making some move, I wonder if when you look at the core of the team now and you're like, okay, so it's Brunson, DiVincenzo, Hart, Robinson, Hartenstein, Deuce McBride, and Ogie, let's say they extend Ogie. Can you get your head around Kat for Randall at that point? And Picks. Does it actually make more sense? And then line those guys up, because then all those guys are all 27, basically. See, Nobody on the team.

As much as I like Kat, I don't think Kat would be the guy. I just think Bridges is now sitting there from a Brooklyn standpoint. The Villanova thing, there's been hints, Howard, you know this, follow the smoke signals. Smoke signals start pumping up in the air like, What's that? I see a little circle. What is that? The Villanova thing, which I think all these guys love, and he just feels like the last piece. If you're Brooklyn, it It doesn't make sense to keep him. It doesn't make sense to do whatever. I'm sure, have you gone to more Nets games or Nets games this year, Howard?

By far, Nets games because I'm right down the street from Barkley Center, so it's just easier to get to.

I mean, is there a sadder atmosphere in the league right now than Nets games? It's the worst, right? They had no fans to begin with, and now everybody just goes to see the other team. The Nets don't like playing with each other. Bridges has been exposed as, Oh, you know what? He's actually not the guy who averaged 26 a game the the last six weeks of the season after the trade. He's an awesome guy to have on your team in your top four, but he's not a lead guy. So I just don't know why the Nets wouldn't cash that in. I actually think he's worth the most of the Nets.

Howard, do you think that the Nets and Nets would do a deal?

See, that's a really good question, Sean. If I had thought ahead on this and done my homework, I would have googled it. I think they last made a trade 40 years ago.

Like Michael Ray-Richinson for-Yes.

That's why I ask that one? It never happens.

It never happens. It would be weird. I don't think it's out of the question if... Listen, I think both of these front offices are pretty pragmatic. It's not like these are like died in the wool, nicks and nets people. Leon was a CAA agent for a zillion years, and Sean Marks is a... I still think of him as a Spurs guy, frankly. I don't know that they would have any emotional or weird, awkward feelings about making a deal. I do wonder if the two owners might, Joe Seye and James Dolan. Who knows how to predict anything that James Dolan would think or feel. But I agree with you, Bill, on the broader premise anyway. I think we discussed this when I was back in January, we were doing some fake trade stuff, or maybe I texted it to you. I thought the Nets should have traded or entertaining Mikael Bridges' trades at the trade deadline.

Because I'm with you. Yeah, we talked about it.

Because I'm with you. Yeah, he's mid-prime or he's early-prime, 27, 28-year range. By the time you're good again as the Nets, I know you want him there as the anchor to attract, whether it's Donovan Mitchell or somebody else who can be the main guy, and Bridges can go back to being that number two or number three guy. And he's a guy you want to play with. Great. That's great. The problem is, you don't know when you're getting that guy. Maybe it happens this summer, but if it doesn't, how long are you holding on to him, waiting for that guy? And by that time, Bridges has burned a couple of years of his prime. And while I'm not projecting this on or expecting it or saying he should, we know how it is in today's NBA. You get somewhere for a while, especially if you're all-star level or even a little tier below that, as Bridges might be, you get understandably antsy and you say, Guys, what are we doing? Maybe I shouldn't be here. Maybe it's time to deal me. I think he's got two years left.

He was sniffing that out this year a couple of times. He didn't fully say it, but it's a little like, What are we doing, guys? If I'm the nets. He got, Simmons next year is an expiring, so next year is screwed good, too. Could you talk yourself into overpaying for Mitchell? If Mitchell is like, I want to be in New York so badly that I'll even play for the Nets.

They're going to trade a draft capital.

Yeah. So you're trading all your draft capital, but now this is your team. Your team is Donovan Mitchell. Simmons probably has to be in that trade, and then Bridges. I still don't see where you are in the East. He's in a worse situation than he's in in Cleveland. His teammates in Cleveland are much better than his teammates would be in Brooklyn. If he feels like he can't go to the Nets, I mean, the Knicks, then maybe that's when Miami becomes a possibility for him. See, when I think about the Knicks, big picture, I think of Bridges and I think of Booker. I know, oh, yeah, Booker's never leaving Phoenix. I just don't believe people are in the same place ever in the NBA anymore. We've been burned so many different times. If I'm the Knicks, who's going to be unhappy End of April. Because we have so many good teams now. There's going to be a couple of teams that are just like, holy shit, we just lost in the first round in five games. Or, oh, my God, we didn't even get out of the plan. We just spent 200 $150 million on our roster.

And I think Phoenix is a good candidate for that. It already seems unhappy when you watch them. I thought that Phoenix-Cleveland game last night was the unhappy All-Star game. At various times, I was I'm worried about the state of mind of both teams. And then there's the Durant piece, too, which we have to mention, Sean. You just have to because he does that interview podcast with Rich Kleiman, which I thought was hilarious to do a podcast with your manager. He's like, I told you we should have done the next. Katie's like, I know you were right. I'm like, All right, so now the door is open now for the Knicks that they're just even talking about that. I just wonder if the Sunstein goes badly this year, did the Knicks come to the rescue?

That would be bitter sweet for me because I love watching Kevin Durant and just my favorite scorer in the last 15 years in the NBA. It was the same attitude that I had towards Aaron Rodgers, who's my favorite quarterback to watch and my ideal as a quarterback in many ways. Doesn't make mistakes, canon arm, great improviser, cerebral.

Good podcast guest.

Absolutely. Both of those guys. Great podcast. A lot of interesting ideas that they're sharing. Thinker. Complicated Yeah, absolutely. Not afraid to go against the green. Zags. No, I mean, both of those guys are dipshets. You know what I mean? They're both coming to us late in their careers. Like, what are we talking about? What I want as a fan, and I think in some ways I feel this way about Jalen Brunson, and maybe I'll feel this way about Garrett Wilson. Maybe I'll feel this way about a handful of other people. I just want somebody who's 26 and the best player in the league one time in my life, just one time. That would be amazing to have, to draft Kevin Durant, not not to get Kevin Durant when he's 37 on his, 'Whoops, I screwed up four years ago and went to Brooklyn contract, and begging his way out of the Matt Ischbia, tire fire, owner syndrome, Phoenix Suns. That just doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense for the culture that Tibbs and Rows built that Howard was talking about. I don't even know what is Durant searching for, a vindication there? What could complicate his legacy even more than trying to make up for the mistake that he made by not coming in the first place, then coming late and then letting us down and not working out.

That's the only thing you could do that would make it worse for Nicks fans.

I don't know. Booker might actually be slightly more realistic if he decided he just didn't want to be there anymore, which we've seen over and over again in the NBA for the last 20 years. But he's got all the Kentucky ties and all the ties with West and those guys. I think that's on the short list for them. That's the one they've been waiting for forever.

He's what I'm talking about. He's 27. He's one of the 10 best players He's in the league. He's a dog, and he would be a mega star in New York.

Makes a little more sense with Brunson, right?

Yeah, he's bigger. He can defend wings. There's more there that makes sense than Mitchell. I don't know, though. In what world are you trading Devin Booker? How can you trade him?

He would have to- He would have to say, I got one out. But that brings me to the point I had earlier, which is we're going to have some unhappiness in April. This is just the way it's going to go. There's going to be five or six teams who are just at the crossroads and players that are going, Oh, my God. I just wasted a year of my career and we won a playing game, and then I lost in five in round one. What's next? What are we going to do? How are we going to get better? And there's going to be no answers. The league's just really, really good. Howard, are you surprised that the Knicks are even in the position where they could potentially lure, they can big game hunt again? Because Because this was so bad. Guys weren't even taking free agent meetings with this organization anymore. Did you ever feel like this was irretrievable if Dolan was the owner or there was some path back?

I mean, there was certainly the case to be made that it might be irretrievable with Dolan as the owner, with all the missteps he's made, privately, publicly, operationally, politically, all kinds of different things you could throw into that bucket. But I've also been covering the league long enough to know that nothing's permanent in this league. The Clippers were the laughing stock for most of our lives. They're about to move into their own beautiful new building. They've got a great owner who's the richest owner in the NBA, maybe the richest owner in sports.

They have James Harden. He's red hot right now. That's going great.

I mean, things happen. But no, but listen, Bill, I think we would agree. If those guys all retired tomorrow, the difference is that by Kawhi and Paul George picking the Clippers and then Harden going Westbrook, whoever, it's changed the image of them. If they have cap room tomorrow, guys are going to actually consider them. The best players will consider them in the way that they never would have during the entirety of the Donald Sterling era. Things change quickly. I'm only surprised that the Knicks are in this position based on what I said earlier, which is that at the time that Leon Rose comes in with World Wide West and everything else, it's like, What exactly are they doing here? Dolan's always hiring the guy who He thinks it can somehow get him the stars immediately. That hasn't even really happened. The one guy who's become the star is Jalen Brunson, who at the time they signed him, people thought was an overpay, and now is a vast underpay. Crazy.

Oh, my God.

The surprise in it is simply that they took a very unconventional road to get here, and the front office has operated in a way that I think most of their predecessors in New York have not. They've done the smart, pragmatic, methodical type of moves, smaller moves, singles and doubles, instead of it all being swing for the fences every time, instead of it being, let's go get Marbury, let's go get Amari Stoud, Amari, let's get Carmelo and trade everything we've got to get them, and now ham string the Carmelo era for the rest of time because we had no assets left to deal. They were always sending out everything they had to get somebody and often the wrong guy at the wrong time. That's what they have not done.

Now they've been patient. Now Now you have Sean dreaming about Booker and towns. One thing that happened that I talked about a couple of times in my podcast during the offseason last year about the Yannis side of things and how one of the Bucks owners sold and I just thought there was some things I just didn't like coming out of that situation. Let's go, Billy.

Let's do it. Come on. Come to New York, Yannis.

No, because he locked in to Milwaukee, at least for a little while. But the I've heard afterwards after the fact, I think the Bucks thought he was going to ask for a trade. I really think that was in play before the season. Then when they did the Dame trade and then all of a sudden, Yannis came back in. I forget which one happened first, but there was a little stretch there where they were like, he's not going to opt in and we're probably going to have to trade him or we're going to lose him for nothing. I think the Knicks were sitting there for that.

Giannis gave two interviews last summer, one with the New York Times and one with a podcast whose name I apologize, it cannot remember, where he basically said, If we're not going to be able to compete for championships, then, yeah, maybe I would go somewhere else. I'm paraphrasing, obviously. But he- He was laying the breadcrumbs.

But I think in real life, I think the situation was way more advanced. Then whatever happened, happened. They stayed. But even the Griffin to Doc thing, I think they're always going to be concerned. He's just going to look up one day and be like, It's time. I've outgrown this place, which we've seen happen a lot in the NBA. I do think the Knicks are hoarding their assets. They're waiting. I'm going to be really interested in the Ananobe contract, though, because I have it written down. Let's just say he's not Lou Gehrig from a durability standpoint Last four years, 29 games missed, 34 games missed, 15 games missed, this year, 31 and counting. I don't even know what's going on with that elbow and why it's not getting better. But I just don't know. There's always some wink-wink stuff with this. How high does that contract go, Sean, before you start throwing up in a garbage can? Four years, 120, are you throwing up yet? Four years, 140? Where are we going? Four years, 160? Are you puking?

That would be not good. Four years, 160 would be not good. I'm concerned. I mean, on the one hand, he's going to be 27 this summer. When he played, he's the ultimate Tibbs weapon. He's the player that I imagine Tibbs has been dreaming of his entire career. A guy who can hit open threes and defend every position on the floor. And he completely unlocked their ability as... I think they went 16 and 2 in January. They were remarkable. But if he has a chronic injury, that's the move that can literally derail a five-year period for a team. I mean, if they're paying him $40 million-Go look at Ben Simmons. Yeah, it can be a disastrous move. I don't know. They have to just make sure that they have the right information about his health because you'd imagine that if he was healthy enough to play right now, he'd be playing. I guess maybe you could make the case that they knew deep down that Randall was never coming back, so they're not trying to push it with Ogie, and that there's a quiet acceptance. That's fair. This is not the year, and so let him heal fully before giving him that extension.

I don't know. That's trying to psychologize the front office there. I am a little nervous Just about the contract, though. Also the weirdness of someone like Ogie making 10 or $15 million more a year than Jalen Brunson, which will get resolved in the next year or two when he gets extended. But that also is strange for a guy who... Ogie is a three. He's like a number three piece on a great team. Not a number two, not a number four. He's a three. And $40 million is a lot for that.

Howard, if Brunson makes all NBA, does he get it? What happens to his contract? I don't know the world because he signed a couple of years ago. But for me, and I've been tinkering with my all-MBA every week now, we're still seven games away. There's some things in flux, but I don't really see a scenario where he's not a second-team OMBA guy for me now.

I think he's probably a I think, and listen, I have not done the exercise yet, Bill. You're ahead of me. I got to get my shit together. But it's hard to imagine that he's not going to make one of the All-MBA teams, and especially because we're in the first year of this whole '65 game rule, which is going to knock out a bunch of other guys.

Knock out Mitchell already.

We're in the first year of it being positionless, too, which I know, Bill, you're still going to go. You've said you're going to go with positions. I'm considering that myself, too. I'm a little uncomfortable with it just being 1-15. But the thing about the 1-15 is, if you want to over Dex forwards or bigs, you can, and that could come at the expense of some guards. Does that mean- True. Somebody like Brunson falls off? I don't know. I'm not saying he should.

He has to be second on. He has to be second on, yeah.

He absolutely has to be. I I don't know. I do not have my Bobby Marks hat on today. I do not know what that does to them on the Supermatch.

It'd be funny if Bobby just came barging into the pod out of nowhere. He just like a bad signal. Sean, what do you think the net rating is of the Hartenstein Hart, Brunson, Dief and Chenzo, Deuce McBride lineup, if you had to guess.

You're going to have to tell me.

It's plus 32.4 per 100 minutes. The Hart Foundation. That's what was trying to get going on the Ringer NBA show. The Hart Foundation, Hartenstein and- And Josh Hart. And Josh Hart.

To me, Dief and Chenzo has been the story. I mean, he's had multiple games now where he's made eight plus three pointers. There's something crazy going on right now.

He was not this good on the Warriors last year.

Not even close. I mean, I think there's... I have heard some people say that there's some confusion around the success of this team because basically every player is having a career year. And if every player has a career year, do you want to overextend your excitement, or is it just these guys have hit their prime and this is who they are? Maybe Dante DiVincenzo is a 40% three-point shooter who shoots 12 threes a game. Maybe that is his game now. I really don't know. It's impossible to tell, though, when Randall and OG don't play because what actually are those other guys who were 25-minute-a-night guys who are now 35-minute-a-night guys? It's really hard to say.

I don't know that either.

The analytics guys will tell you that three-point shooting is one of those things where if you have suddenly a career... I hate to bring this up for Sean's sake, but like, Raymond Felton and maybe J. R. Smith that same year, the 54-win season. Some guys had career years or outstanding three-month stretches. The analytics guys will tell you three-point shooting, if you have an outlier year, especially to the high end, way over your career average, that's probably the anomaly. It doesn't necessarily mean it takes a while to stabilize, and so it's not necessarily a permanent state of affairs. I think there should be at least a little bit of concern about too many guys having career years. Is it that they're all hitting their prime at the same time? Is it that they're playing with Jalen Brunson? Is it that it's just a chemistry thing? Is it just the universe, everything clicked in the place? If you overpay everyone and assume this is just going to keep climbing, that could be a little scary.

Can I give you what my biggest concern would be? Because we lived in Boston with the Isiah Thomas here. Rasila brought this up on Sunday's pod. Isaiah Thomas had a very similar year to what Brunson's doing this year, where he was just awesome. Actually running a lot of the same offensive sets that the Celtics ran that year, that the Dings are running him this year, and just took a physical pounding night after night after night after night and couldn't sustain it, got hurt. When I watch Brunson, I think the thing that is one of the reasons I can't wait to put him on my second team, is just the pounding he takes night after night. Fucking love that guy, man. He really leaves it all out, especially when they changed the roles in February. There were some guys that it was just worse for. He was bad for Curry, it was bad for Brunson. Some of these guys that you can really rough up, especially the smaller guards. That guy keeps ticking. I thought that San Antonio game, what did he end up with? '61?

Yeah.

And he only had six free throws. There was 10 different times he went flying in or something. But it's not surprising to me to hear that you think he's the most popular in Nixon's viewing.

But it speaks to a challenge that that team is having right now because now two of their three losses have come down to the last possession, and Brunson has taken the final shot in both games, and he's been unbelievable in both games. But he's freaking exhausted playing 44 minutes a game, and he's taking off-balance shots with not a lot of offensive help missing guys. And what's he supposed to do? The Isaiah Thomas thing is a little scary to me because Isaiah Thomas, when you look back, basically had those two mega seasons with the Celtics where he was amazing. I don't think we're going to look back on Brunson as having these two incredible seasons with the Knicks and then breaking down. I guess it's possible. We have to account for it. They're built a little bit differently, and they play a little bit differently to me, Brunson and Thomas. Thomas is a little bit more slight, I think, than Brunson is.

Well, Thomas was... I mean, he's probably 5'9.

He's 5'9 Brunson is sitting at 6'2, but his own teammates say he's closer to 6, I think. Yeah.

But he felt a little bit stiffer and sturdier to me, too, Brunson.

Well, either way, Sean's back. I remember there was a time in the mid-2010s when he thought about giving up the NBA entirely.

I never in a million years would have thought, as Howard said, that it would have been Leon Rosen and Tibbs who would have gotten me back in, too. I was very dubious of the Tibbs hire. I was miserable when they failed to sign Durant. Miserable. That might have been my lowest because I thought that that was their best chance to get that credibility back. I was 100% wrong about that. They have done an amazing job rebuilding this team and never made a mistake. But now we're at this summer, this could be the time when you make the mistakes. I really hope they don't.

All right, Sean Fentasey. I can listen to him on the big picture and on the rewatchables every once in a while. Sometimes he goes on the New York, New York podcast with John Justremsky. Usually unhappily.

That's our own five, Phil.

We got to put you in- That's our own five. We got to put you in a situation when you're popping on sports podcasts in a happy mood. Anyway, Howard staying on. Thanks, Sean. Thanks, guys. Taking a break. All right, now we're going to play a game with Howard called, surprise me, I guess you would call it. I just told you to come up with a couple of topics, and you were like, Do you want me to send them to you? And I said, No. I'm totally confident in my ability to just bounce off whatever you're going to throw at me. So I asked you to come up with two or three things that you care about right now as we head into the last, what do we got? 10 days left in the season. What do you care? What's on your mind?

I've got four or five. This is definitely one thing I've learned about you, Bill, in our brief time together here at The Ringer, that you do like surprises. I do. Here we go. You know what? I'm going to do this. I'm going to skip down my list here to a contrarian take. Contrarian, actually, it's contrary to what something you said when you and Ursula were talking recently, and it picks up on something we were just discussing about the Nets, which is this. I know you were talking about hopelessness in Nets versus Wizards. And I would say this, I actually would rather have, and this is if I'm a third team, if I were some other team trading, I would rather have the Nets package of Sunspicks than the Houston package of Netspicks. And it goes to something we were just discussing, which is this Suns thing is really all over the map. It could go any direction in the playoffs. I don't know if they're a first round out, Bill, or a conference finalist. But if it crashes and burns, Durant's turning 36 in September. He's played over 1,200 games, counting the playoffs.

Two big injuries.

The three-foot surgery year, people have forgotten about that way back in Oklahoma, three-foot surgeries in 18 months, plus the Achilles. I hope Durant can play for many more years to come at a high level as he still does. But you just don't know when the end hits for these guys. The Beale contract is going to handicap the Suns through 2027 when he'll be making 57 million in 2627. So if Douramp were to break down or, as you said, bail out, I'm not sure that's going to happen.

Or get old. There's three options, right? Break down, bail out, get old, or stay at this level.

How long is it going to be? How many minutes expire before Booker has just made the call to say, I'm out, pull the rip cord? So the Suns' picks that are going to Brooklyn, they got the 2023 already. So there's 25, 27, 29 at a swap in 28. I'm saying, Bill, that by the time 20, maybe not 25, by the time that 27 pick comes around and then the swap in 28 and 29, the Nets could very well be the better team than the Suns. So they'll get the swap and they'll get the higher picks. The Suns could be crashing and burning and it could be pretty ugly. Whereas with the Nets, granted, rough spot they're in right now, but they do have flexibility, including all those picks that they could trade. Their picks to Houston, they still owe 25, or excuse me, 24, 26, and then swaps in 25 and 27.

Which is brutal. It's the next four years, Houston has the better pick or the pick.

Yeah. But the thing for the Nets is the silver lining for them, if you can call it that, is like right now, if the season ends right now, their lottery pick, their draft pick is somewhere in that 8, 9 range. The last time that that happened and that pick went somewhere else, it became Colin Sexton for the Cavaliers. Not catastrophic. It could be. But if this is as bad as it gets for the Nets, Bill, if they can, whether they're trading Bridges for a bunch of stuff, whether they're trading Cam Johnson for a bunch of stuff, whether they are trading all those Suns' picks to get Donovan Mitchell, they're going to at least be competent, I think sooner than later, in which case those pics that they still had at Houston might not be that bad. They may be just low lottery or somewhere in the mid-teens, whatever. But I don't think they're going to be... It's not like sending the Jalen Brown, Jason Tate and pics to Boston once upon a time. I think they're going to level out or at least be competent.

Can I zag on your zag?

Yeah, while the Suns crash. Yeah, go.

Let's go through the East. Would you rather be the Pistons next four years with all your picks and the players you have or the Nets?

As bad as the Pistons are, I think I want to be the Nets.

Really? I would much rather be the Pistons.

At least I know I have some winning talent and that if it doesn't fit together, I can do something with it, even if it's trading it. I don't know what the Pistons have right now, Bill. I know Ivy and these guys, and Cunningham's got some… There's some stuff there, but I just feel like something's really a there. I don't know what it is.

Wizards?

The Wizards are in that early stages of the teardown, so it's hard to assess. But again, the Nets have- At least they have their picks. But the Nets have all those Suns' picks, plus they still have a pick from the Mavericks and the Sixers. They're sitting on a lot of decent capital that they could spend.

Would you rather be Charlotte or the Nets?

Probably Charlotte on the hope of a Brandon Miller bringing the Renaissance and LaMelo Ball someday staying healthy and in a better front office coming in via the Nets, of all things.

I'd rather be Charlotte. Toronto or the Nets. I mean, Toronto is tanking now, so they're going to have a top six pick in the worst draft in 24 years, plus the other assets, and they have all their other stuff. I'd probably rather be Toronto.

And they've got Scottie Barnes. On any of these, I'll start with, if your best player is young and better than my best player, I'm going to take that guy. So yes, Scottie Barnes and Toronto win that battle.

And then if you go the 10 playoff teams and play off teams and play in teams. I think I'd rather be them than the Nets. Just cross the board.

Yeah, different exercise that I agree with you, but I'm just saying in a vacuum.

I see your point. Basically, you think the possibility of downside with Phoenix from the mid-2020s on to you is scarier than wherever this could go with the Nets? I guess my counter would be because everyone's like, Well, the Nets will get good players because it's New York, people want to play there. But the part that everybody forgets is the other players have been playing there the last 10 years. If I'm another player going in there and playing in Brooklyn, am I excited to be there for 41 home games? From what I've seen, passing through? Is it like, is this a destination compared to, I don't know, when you play at MSG, when you play in Boston, when you pick anywhere?

Yeah. It's tough. It's a tough contrast, especially when you're in the same city with the Knicks and the garden is just absolutely rocking. And even in the worst of times, the garden is intense. Barclays isn't great most of the time. I've seen some good moments there. The Nets fans will rally now and then. But yeah, a lot of times the place is filled with fans of the star on the other team, LeBron or Steph or whoever's coming through. That part's tough, but some guys would actually prefer maybe... Listen, Durant was accused of this. He and Kyrie were accused of this, of you get all the benefits of New York without necessarily as much of the scrutiny because the Knicks get all of that pressure and the Nets get very little of it. So it may just depend on the temperament of the player. There's still a lot of advantages to being in New York, regardless. And it may well be a trade. Everything is trades now anyway. I think the pressure's on Sean Marks, clearly, firmly right now to make a move this summer. He made the moves under duress to trade Kyrie Irving and Kevin Durant and did pretty well both deals.

But then he just sat on it for the last year and a half, year plus. I think this summer is the point where it's like, Okay, we've let this go long enough. We have to course-correct at some point and pick a direction. If you and I resume this conversation in late July, August, I wonder where we'll be because something tells me the nets are going to... I don't know if it's dramatic. I don't know if they're getting a superstar, but they're going to make moves to at least become good again. And that's what they the last time they were in this position. They didn't let themselves sink too far for too long before they pivoted. And some of that was just overachieving and finding hidden gems and Kenny Atkinson coaching his ass off and them overachieving. But I don't know. It'll be interesting.

Yeah, I wonder if they go all in on Mitchell and do the Danny Ainge mid-2000s philosophy of, We have to, now it'll be easier to get the third. Because we've seen teams do that. I just don't know in the East where it goes. I am surprised that Sean Marks, that they haven't shaken up the front office at all. This is a pretty long time to have the same group, and they've been zagging around with not a lot of highlights. All right, what's your next bullet point?

I could either go historical or a little bit wacky.

Which would you prefer? Let's go historical.

Historical. I've heard some discussion in the last couple of days about, and especially in the wake of Tim Bond, Tempting the DSPN, doing his latest MVP poll, Jokuj winning a third time in four years. The idea that we need to be mindful of history, and we did this discussion a year ago, too, as an NBA community, could Jokuj get three in a row because it puts him in this elite territory? Is My view of this has always been, the season is the season. If you start trying to take too much of the historical into account, and you're a historian of the game built, I think it can warp your thinking a little bit, and I get it. Do we want to put Jokuj alongside guys like Wilt or Bird or whatever? But now that he's won the Championship, I would hope that people who have that concern might tamp that down a little. And yet on the podcast the other day when Bontem and McMahon are talking, I think it was Bontem said that he already had somebody saying, Jokuj can't win it for a third time in four years even. The list is this, right?

So the guys with three or more, Moses Malone, Bird and Magic have three, Wilt and LeBron have four, Bill Russell and MJ have five, Kareem has six. So Jokuj, by winning a third, which seems likely right now, will pull him out of the group of two where Yannis, Steph, Nash, Duncan, Karl Malone, and Bob Petitar, and it'll put Jokuj alongside Magic Bird and Moses. I know that still seems startling for people, especially for older fans, to put him on that level. But we don't, Bill, we don't literally put a guy on a level, right? We're not sitting here right now and saying Jokuj is the equivalent of magic. We're just saying that this This season, 2023, '24, especially once Embiid went down, because Embiid was definitely leading the race at the moment he went down, this is Jokuj's to lose. Who knows how this will go in the next couple of weeks, but there was a landslide in the straw hole.

We know, by the way, the Fandil odds is minus 4,000. I think it's a wrap.

If this is where it's headed, I don't think anybody should have any historical concerns with it.

What do you I'll go off the top rope on this. The four years that he just had are up there with any four-year stretch of any great player. Bird's best stretch was 84 to 87, and Magic was probably 87 to 90. But you go through the four-year peaks of guys and what he did, it's freaking crazy. One of the things that I always love to do with this stuff was, if you just look, the most basic thing you could do is points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, where somebody ranks in the league. Some of the convos, if you just added, let's say you're in first place in points, you're in third place in assists, so that's one point plus three points, and you're in ninth place in rebounds. So combined, that's 13. If you look at some of the stuff that he's doing and Luca's doing, it's stuff that is pretty rarefied there. I did this, ironically, for a or solopata, we never ended up using it. If you go through the premise of you have to be in the top 20 in points, rebounds, and assists to qualify for this list, and then you add the rankings of each number in the lowest possible number wins.

It's almost like golf. Kareem in 1976 was an 18. His three placements together added up to 18. You go on through. Bird did it four times. He had a 29 and 85 and 30 and 84, 32 and 81, 33 and 82. But in the last seven years, as the offense has gone up, all of a sudden this became way easier, where you have... Jokuj had a 16 in 2022. You know how fucking absurd that is? You add his three places, it only adds up to 16. So he's at 21 this year. The best ever was Wilt Chamberlain in 1968. He was seven. He led the league in rebounds and assists. It was like fifth in scoring. My point is, every year, he's always in the top three or four in rebounds and assists, and he's in the top 10 in points. His team's offensive rating is always in the top five. He's the most fun player to watch. He elevates his teammates more than anyone else in the league. His team wins. If Murray didn't get hurt, you could argue they might have had more than one title. I think they're going to win again this year.

So if he ends up with two titles, this is fine. This is the pool he should be swimming in. Do people not think this?

Apparently, that's still a thing. Like I said, it hadn't really- What does he have to do? I know. It's weird. And you would think the pressure release valve would have been the championship last year, where it's like, Oh, well, if he wins all these regular season awards, but he doesn't win the championship, then aren't those a little empty? Which, again, these are separate things. We vote at the end of the regular season for a reason. But I do think for those people who are, and I get it, if you think that you need some validation as to be an all-time great, you need finals, you need champions, fine. He got his Championship and his finals MVP, and a few months from now, he might be raising another one.

Also, the playoff performance has matched the regular season performance, which I think is a very important... He's always been really good in the playoffs. I just feel like that Murray injury took out two playoffs for him because of the timing of when the injury was. Murray could not have gotten hurt at a worst point in the season. It was right before one so they couldn't even make a trade to try to save it. And then it also took them out for the next playoffs. I look back at that Suns Bucks series, and could they have made it that year? Absolutely. And then you go to '22, the Warriors won the title. And I think the ceiling of the Nuggets team was probably slightly better than that 22 Warriors team. So I don't know. To me, this four-year run is about as good as it's gotten since I've been watching basketball.

Yeah. And that should speak for itself, right? No matter whatever hardware he want along the way, when he's putting up the numbers he has and his team is having the success it has, there should be no reservations about that.

And on top of everything else, the artistry of just... Like the game he had Sunday against Cleveland. They He didn't just kick Cleveland's ass. He was fucking levitating above the game. He was throwing crazy passes, and he was just dominating it. And that's the last piece when it's not just like, you're great, your team's winning the stats, but when you watch somebody just dominate another team.

When it often looks effortless.

Yeah, and it just looks like he's toying with them. Lebron got to that point probably the last couple of Miami years, I felt like, especially in 2013. 2018, and then would have shades of it in Cleveland. But then that 2018 where it just felt like he could just rip through anybody and get 40 points whenever he wanted. But it's a pretty rare place to get to. I think it's the reason people are so afraid of Luka this year, because Luka has these moments where you wonder, Shit, could he do this four-time in a playoff series? And would it matter who he's playing? Where he just feels like he's levitating above the game. So anyway, what's your wacky one?

Spin Off of the the MVP discussion. I proposed this on a podcast. I used to do a podcast with Zack Lo and Rachel Nichols. We would do this once a year. We would split it between our pods, and it was the Drunk with Power pod. And we would just propose stuff, no matter how ridiculous or sometimes very practical and basic. I proposed this. It was mocked, but I'm proposing it again here. I think the MVP ballot should go seven deep. So this is not a major thing, Bill, and it would not change the outcome. A sixth and seventh spot on the MVP ballot is not going to change who wins. But look at the poll again that they just did, where 10 guys got at least one vote, Jalen Brown getting exactly one vote. Guys who did not appear in the poll, though, who did not get votes, but I think could justify a fourth or fifth spot, Zion, Booker, or Durant. Now, there's games played issues for Booker, potentially, although I think he's going to make it. In a normal year, Embiid would have been on the ballot somewhere, so that pushes everybody down a spot.

Donovan Mitchell could have been. He was arguably in the discussion for, again, down ballot spot. Baseball goes 10 deep on their MVP ballot. Ten.

Why? So we only have five Because that's the way they've always done it.

Because it's the way we've always done it. And I'm not saying... I got accused of this being participation trophy territory, which okay, fair. It's just more like this. What happens sometimes after these votes is then fans say, Well, how come my guy didn't get more support? How come my guy wasn't even on the ballot? And I would say it's because everybody makes their own... There's usually two or three guys who are truly in the race. And four and five is usually, I think this guy had a great season, but his team wasn't good enough. Or I think this guy's team was really good and he was pretty good. He's in the discussion somewhere. Domanes Sabones got a couple of fifth-place votes, I think, in the ESPN poll. He's a good one. He wasn't on my ballot that I sent into bond temps. But he could have been. Kawhi Leonard wasn't on my ballot, could have been. Anthony Edwards could have been. If we have seven, then more of the guys who are in that four to seven discussion, or excuse me, that four or five discussion, it becomes a four through seven discussion. I think we have enough guys each year who merit that four and five spot.

If you do that, then somewhere in the consensus of the 100 voters, that four and five might actually change because if you got enough sixes, it might make up for the fact that not enough people put your fifth.

This is a good point because somebody can get the fourth because some idiot voted somebody in a first-place MVP, and that just swung his points, and all of a sudden, he was fourth.

It's just a thought. It's not the most important thing in the world, but it's something I've kicked around now. Then I also think we need a third all defensive team. But I think that one requires CBA amendments because anything regarding awards and having more guys being named something, I think requires the league and the union to approve it. But for the last few years, I feel like, especially, you start polling people around the league, who should be on the all defensive team. That's a conversation I always have because I think it's one of the harder ones we do. There's always more than than 10 that are deserving. We have three all NBA teams. Why don't we have three all defensive teams?

I would add a 20 minutes and under a game spot. I would have the two teams, but then some way to commensurate our guy, Jonathan Isaac, because he just needs... If the goal of all the ballots is to be a snapshot of the season... As you were talking, because I love the random fourth or fifth place guy in the MVP voting when you look back years later. So I went back 10 years because I was like, what was the Noah year when it was like, oh, man, Noah had that awesome year. Noah was fourth in the MVP ballot in 2014. It went Durant, LeBron, Blake Griffin, Noah, James Harden, Houston, and then Jeff Curry was six, and Chris Paul was seven, and Al Jefferson was eight in Charlotte. But the MVP vote- Al Jefferson. It's great. But then I think I'm with you. It's fun to look at the four through seven guys, and I think there's probably a better way to do I can't back this up with any data bill, and the league will correct me if I'm wrong, because I know that they do look at this.

I think we've had less randomness since we went to transparency. About 10 years ago, the league just moved, and we were part of this. The Pro Basketball Writers Association had had discussions with them about this. I love it. So it went transparency, right? The thing with transparency, it's pros and cons, but the potential con is because everybody knows exactly how we've all voted, and now you might be worried a little bit about backlash or or fan base is coming after you, especially in the era of social media, which is more of a recent phenomenon. And so does it encourage more groupthink? Does it make people go with safer bets?

But I would say transparency and groupthink are on two separate lanes in the highway traveling next to each other, and they're both separate problems that both feed into each other. Because the group thinks another thing. I think you saw it last year with Jokuj and Bede. If we didn't know who was voting on that, I think that vote's different. I think some people are afraid to vote on Jokuj because they didn't want to take shit. If it's just like, Oh, this is an anonymous 100 votes, I'm telling you that vote's different.

I get what you're saying, and I think I've heard you bring up versions of this before. The only thing I would push back on with that is, and I always say this, and it's the obvious, there's 100 people voting. It used to be 125. I think it was 130 at one point. You just don't know how... Everybody's in their own little bubble. No, it's not like everybody's conferring. I always try to stay away from mind reading.

But the league knows, though, if somebody fucks up the vote, pull the vote.

No, I get that. No, all I'm saying is, with respect to the idea that people change the vote because of the stuff that Kendrick Perkins said, and maybe it made people self-conscious or whatever, and now people were... These are impossible to prove things. You have to be able to mind read or interview all 100 voters and hope that they all told you the exact truth.

I think it's the All-MBA is the same. You basically have to put LeBron on the All-MBA or you're like a LeBron hater. Lebron is like Beyoncé. I'm going to put LeBron on this year because I think he's one of the best 15 players. But last year I didn't, and I didn't put him on. But it doesn't Our job is to put the best people on.

For sure. But to the extent that transparency has maybe made people more self-conscious or maybe pushed some or inspired some groupthink or may people make safer bets, I think that's affected things like the four and five, perhaps on the MVP. It would be really interesting and more fun, I think, if you've got more names involved and you have more names involved if you have a deeper ballot.

I like this. I can't believe Rachel and Zack made fun of this. I think it's a great idea. So this year, Jokuj is going to win, and then it'll be Luca, Yannis, SGA, probably Tatum in some order. But then you also have Edwards is lingering, Brunson's lingering, Therance, not insane. Halliburton, I think, would have been in the conversation, But the way he's played the last couple of months, probably not. But there's probably eight guys. But it'll be interesting. You could make a case, Edwards should be fifth or sixth because he's kept that team rolling. They lose towns, and he's taken a bigger responsibility. They're going to be the one-seated. It seems like they have a real chance.

Yeah. If you do it, you're doing Edwards at the expense of probably Tatum or Brunson. It's that painful thing as a voter. Then, of course, again, the fan bases justifiably would be saying, I can't I need this guy to get more support. Well, if we had six and seven spots, more guys would get some of that support for the down-ballet stuff that guys, I think, have earned that respect for. I guess the league's response could be, Hey, we took positions off all NBA so that you could reward more people without... Because now that is reflective of 1 through 15 in theory, whereas before it was reflective of top six guards, top six forwards, top three centers. And now it's more of a true 1 through 15. So I guess you could make the case that we don't need MVP to go. But I also think those are different honors, Bill. People debate this one, too. But I think MVP, the winning and winning at a high level is baked in to the equation because of the V. And with all MBA, to me, it's more about just individual excellence And the wins are a factor, but to me, not as big of a factor as MVP.

I agree with that.

Well, since you got a little goofy, I'll give you one, and then I know we have to go. They added this clutch player award, which I don't think has really worked. Because you just look up the clutch stats and it's like, Oh, De Rosen has this and Curry has this. Kyle, turn the TikTok camera. I don't know what you should call this award, but I know it should exist because if you look back at a season, I want to know the blueprint of who was in the OMBA, MVP, Rookey of the Year, Coach of the Year. Oh, yeah, I remember that year. That was when this, this, and this. It should be a, Thanks for making the league more fun this year. It should be the theme of the award. I don't know if it's just called the Thank You Award or it's the Most Fun Award, or I don't know what you would call it, but it would go to the guy who unexpectedly made this season more fun. And this year, I think if we were talking about it, if I could figure out what the title of it was or whatever, but I think you know what I mean.

It's like the Lance Stevenson Award or something.

Oh, so Rudy says the League Pass Value Award. I like this, the LPV Award. So if we had the League Pass Value or League Pass Valuable Player Award, the LPP, whatever. It's Wemby, and it's probably Anthony Edwards, and then Jokuj. Then we would be arguing about it's got to be Jokuj. No, Jokuj won last year. It's got to be somebody else. But I would say the case for Ant and Wemby would be like, we didn't have this last year. So it's almost like a cousin of the Most Improved Award. But I think of that first Blake Griffin lops it a year. Blake Griffin would have won that year. The next year when Curry started hitting the threes, you're like, oh, my God, this is amazing. I can't believe we have this. I feel like that has to be captured in some way, and it's not the Most Improved Award.

All right. So you're thinking this could be stars. I was thinking Lance Stevenson as somebody who's just a role player who's goofy and makes us entertained. But you're saying more like guys who just actually you want to tune in, you don't care what else happens in the game or whether their team is any good. You just want to watch that guy.

You were just happy they were in the league this year, and you got just an incredible amount of entertainment about them. I almost feel like it could be like Apex Mountain and Rewatchables, where nobody really totally knows how to define it or what it means exactly. So maybe it's up to each person. You might think, Bowl, Bowl. I fucking love Bowl, Bowl. And it's like, nobody's allowed to criticize your pick because it's the pick for you. It's like, I just love Bowl, Bowl. And Bowl, Bowl Bull, and Bowl Bull comes in, that's my guy, and he's my pick. I would have had Ant locked into this, but everything that's What happened with Wemby the last few weeks, I think it's now a two-person race between those two. Because the Wemby thing, some of the shit he was doing against... What was it? Golden State the other night? Or Denver. Denver.

Yeah, Denver. He blocked Jokuj three times.

Blocked Jokuj. It got to the point when Jokuj was scoring on him, I was like, Oh, my God, he got one. It was just like, This is the best part of the league. Then that one time Reggie Jackson challenged him. Then Wemby will come and take a terrible three, but it was so much fucking fun to watch. I don't know. It just feels like that should be an award. But what does that call then? So we call it the League?

Well, we used to have on Twitter, we'd say, League Pass alert, hashtag John Schumann came up with that, right? Hashtag League Pass Alert. It's like the League Pass Alert Award, the guy who is most likely to light up your social media or your text with somebody telling you, Dude, you got to turn on the game right now to watch this guy, right?

So the League Pass Alert Award, LPA?

Lpa, something like that. I I'm just going to say right now, I need a seven-man ballot for this, Bill.

We got to- You want to have an all-MBA team?

We haven't even invented it yet, but I'm going to already start lobbying for more slots on my ballot just to make sure.

I'm sure people will have ideas for this. But yeah, to me, this is a better award than clutch because the clutch thing is stupid, and I don't think anybody likes it, and it doesn't make sense to me.

It's stat-driven, which is fine. They just make it stat-driven. Just use the algorithm to say who was the most clutched by the The statistical, and we don't need to vote on it. It's by virtue of... Because we're all looking at those stats anyway. Mba. Com stats has the clutch stats.

It's too easy to figure out who it is. There's no discourse. But the LPA award, Now there's some discourse. All right. Howard Beck, have fun at the next game tonight.

Thanks, Bill. Good to see you.

All right, that's it for the podcast. Thanks to Kyle Creighton and Steve Cerruti for producing, as always. Thanks to Sean Fentacy. Thanks to Howard Beck. Don't forget new rewatchables coming on Monday night. Stay tuned for that. Check out youtube. Com/bilsimmons as well for all the short and long videos from this podcast and from the rewatchables and from my walk and talks as well. I am definitely doing some walk and talks this weekend. Enjoy the weekend. Great, great, great, great, great sports weekend. Hopefully, the weather will get nice around the country. We'll see. Enjoy the weekend. I will see you on Sunday. On the wayside, on the wayside, I don't have a few years with them. On the wayside, on the Must be 21 plus in present in select states. Fandle is offering online sports wadering in Kansas under an agreement with Kansas Star Casino, LLC. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-Gambler. Visit fandle. Com/rg. Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and Vermont. Call 1-800-Next Step or text next step to 533-42 in Arizona. 888-789-7777 or visit ccpg. Org/chat-in- Connecticut, 809 with it in Indiana. 800-522-4700 or visit ksgamblinghelp. Com in Kansas.

877-77-0 Stop in Louisiana. Mdgamblinghelp. Org in Maryland. 800-gambler. Net in West Virginia. 800-522-4700 in Wyoming. Hope is here. Visit Gambling Helpline, MA. Stop in Louisiana. Mdgamblinghelp. Org in Maryland. 800-gambler. Net in West Virginia. 800-522-4700 in Wyoming. Hope is here. Visit Gambling Helpline, MA.522-4700 in Wyoming. Hope is here. Visit gamblinghelp-line ma. Org or call 800-327-5050 for 24/7 support in Massachusetts. Or call 1877-8 Hope-Ny or text Hope-Ny in New.