Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.

So what in Haiti's is going on in Pennsylvania? I've already explained to you with the vote count, Pennsylvania, how there's this conundrum, dilemma, issue, problem, that more votes were counted than people who voted. Well, the explanations I told you as an actual doing, actual reporting on my journal s if we got an explanation from the state of Pennsylvania, we would put it on the show. So I will do that today. But the explanation, I think, is going to leave you more puzzled than the initial problem.

About how they counted more votes, counted more votes than people who voted more votes, people that make losses. Also, some really stunning video you're not going to want to miss of a guy in Georgia, an election expert, an expert witness claiming he hacked into the Georgia voting system now for the runoff. I'll play that video Today show brought to you by Express VPN. Ladies and gentlemen, protect your online activity from prying eyeballs. Surf the web and go to express VPN, Express VPN Dotcom Bongino today.

Pick up your VPN. Don't wait. Welcome to Dan Bongino, show producer. Joe, how are you today? Fine, sir.

I am doing quite well. And you used one of my favorite words. Conundrum, conundrum. Conundrum.

A safety word, right? Mean not even a word, anyone. I have this word of the day thing. I do. You know, folks, a quick story. Before I was always obsessed with having a good vocabulary. When I was a young kid in my teens, I took this course. It was on audiotape called Verbal Advantage, and you'd play them in your car. There were these forty five minute tapes. It was the greatest thing I ever did when I was I was always obsessed with self-improvement, even as a young man.

So I'm glad I could make Joe happy, I think, using the word conundrum. All right, folks, let's get right to it. Today's show about you by our friends at Hem's 66 percent of men start to lose their hair by age thirty five. Nobody likes that. Nobody likes that. Once you've noticed, thinning hair can be too late for Hem's, dotcom is a one stop shop for hair loss. It's time to write a new chapter, one in which you have hair.

Hims is helping guys be the best version of themselves with licensed medical providers and FDA approved products to help treat hair loss. No snake oil pills or gas station counter supplements. Hem's was created by a guy who knows some men's health conversations are easier online than in person, no more awkward in person. Doctor visits a long pharmacy lines for him, connects you to a licensed medical professional online. It could save you hours. It's completely confidential of the answer.

A few quick questions. A medical professional review it. They'll determine if it's right for you. They can prescribe you medication to treat hair loss that is shipped directly to your door today. Hem's is giving you the best offer yet. If you're not happy with the results after 90 days, hymns will give you a full refund. And right now my listeners can get their first visit absolutely free. Go to four. That's FSR for hymns, Stockham, Mangino for him.

Starcom Bongino. Prescription products require an online consultation with a health care provider will determine if a prescription is appropriate. Restrictions apply see website for full details on important safety information. Reminder you are out. That's for FOIA him Dotcom Bongino. Don't wait. Go today.

All right, Joe, let's go. All right, so unlike pretend fake news journalists who give you one side of the story, always the side that aligns with the Soviet Union and the liberals, we give you both sides. So I covered this Pennsylvania as Joe, like Joe loves the word conundrum where apparently more people voted or more votes were counted in Pennsylvania than people voted. Six point nine million people apparently voted in Pennsylvania, according to their sure system, which is an acronym for their state registry.

So six point nine million people voted, but only six point seven million votes were counted. Obviously a problem. It doesn't make any sense. You counted more votes and people voted. I said I'd give you both sides. Very good article I have in the show. Notes up today if you want to access the show notes. That's my newsletter, Bunshiro. That consolation newsletter subscribe. We'll send them to you. Just the news. John Solman site has a response which I'm giving you to be fair to both sides from these Pennsylvania officials.

I'm just going to tell you before I dig into it, the response does make a lot of sense either. You'll see what I mean in a minute. Just the News.com. Daniel Paine. Amid claims of unexplained ballots, Pennsylvania officials unsure how many voted in 2012. It's not a joke. Several counties have not uploaded full voter histories, said a spokesperson. We keep that up and keep. I want to read this headline to you again. We are now.

What was the election? November 3rd. We are now into the New Year. It is New Year's Eve. Happy New Year's Eve. With the New Year will be tomorrow. Twenty twenty will be left behind. And Pennsylvania, according to the headline I told you, I give you both sides. They're still unsure how many people voted and voter histories still haven't been uploaded. I was just checking out for the loose, making sure she was neat, my wires of what the hell what in Haiti is going?

Are we missing something? Ladies and gentlemen, this is not an election in Afghanistan. This is an election in the United States. We're still not sure how many people voted in a key swing state. And voter histories have not been uploaded yet. You may be like, that's the right. No, that's not even their explanation for why they have six point nine million votes counted, but only six point seven million people voting. The explanation gets worse.

Let's dig into the piece first where the big discrepancy comes explaining it again. Sorry to have to relitigate the beginning. We covered it the other day, but it's important some of you may be hearing my show for the first time. Here's what went down in Pennsylvania from the just the news piece, quote, A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3rd, as recorded by the Department of State shows that, again, six point nine million total ballots were reported as being cast.

A press release announcing the findings said, quote, While the Department of State sure system or court records indicate that only six point seven total six point seven million total voters actually voted for, the conundrum here is obvious. If you counted six point nine million votes, there's a I'm just I'm rounding it up to six point nine. You can read the just the news piece for the exact number. But for the sake of brevity, six point nine million votes were counted, but only six point seven million people voted.

Even a liberal can figure out that this is like Al Gore math, like that's kind of a problem. So, again, OK, get to the explanation. Let's get right to it from the just the news, because this is the official Pennsylvania, the state representative from Pennsylvania has an explanation for this. And if this doesn't leave you scratching your head, I don't know what will. But to be fair to them, unlike liberal media hacks who won't help give you their side, too, I don't know how much of a side this is, but what about the number of ballots cast from the just the news piece?

The number of ballots cast is not necessarily going to match up exactly with the number of all the voters who voted Murray, this person, Murrain said, representing the state of Pennsylvania. Still, the number of ballots on the state's website should be considered a rough estimate of the number of people who voted. And she said if this we're doing so, we're doing rough, rough estimates. Now, this is our rough estimate. Hey, listen, if there was a rough estimate by one congressional district, six in Maryland, what a rough estimate I want.

It goes on. It goes up to me. And Joe wouldn't be here. Right. Here's another quote from this Pennsylvania official. We have to keep in mind those people whose ballots were cast and not counted. She she added, quote, That's going to be one of the differences. And there are people who cast the ballot and don't vote not. Just thank you, Jim. Sometimes you said my head scratching. Come back to that, my head scratching sometimes doesn't work.

So Joe has to play that scratching effect that you get it.

So I again, I obviously I'm skeptical. I will always put out there. Is there an innocent explanation for all this? I hope so. Could there be? Yes, I'm I'm not I don't work for CNN. We do the truth here. There could be an innocent explanation. There can always be an innocent explanation for anything. And we should we should be open to that. Having said that, I promised you I would give you Pennsylvania's response to this weird scenario where Pennsylvania counted six point nine million votes in only six point seven million people voted.

And their explanation is either very rare to get an explanation excuse me, a articulated thought out. Paula usually gives me gesticulations, but we've never rarely input her voice. Did you hear in the background their explanation even had Paula go her? She's saying that the woman from Pennsylvania saying the reason there's that discrepancy is because people showed up and voted but didn't vote for anyone. Hold on, let's do Joe. All right. Let's have folks out. You got to watch the rumble video to see what's going to happen here.

I'm sorry if you're if you're. I know I'm backing away from the mic. Forgive me. I am not a broadcasting professional. I am a total renegade rebel on the radio. That's why our show is called The Renegade Republican at one point. So this to be clear. Yes. As it went down. So you show up to vote, you have a box that says. Trump all writing is down sharply so you can see it, you have a box that says Biden, so you request a vote by mail or you show up to vote.

Yeah, I'm going to even write in this ballot. Right. So you show up and you're Joey bag of donuts and you walk in and you're like, hey, Matt, here's my bag. I actually did draw the ballot trump Biden so normal people would go and would check a box. Me, I checked Trump. Paul, you voted for Trump too, right? Yeah. So that's two. So you show up and say, hey, man, here's my ballot.

So what happened? Just to be clear, the Pennsylvania state people are saying this two hundred thousand vote discrepancy between the votes you counted and people actually voted is because people showed up to vote and gave a ballot that looked like this with no no box checked at all. I'm showing up to vote because my ballot. Ma'am, you didn't vote. Yeah, but I want to vote. I'm voting by not voting. What are you voting for? I don't know.

I'm just here to vote. Are there free drinks? What's that? They were following, yeah, they reported they were born, so you show up, you don't want to vote, but you vote. You like I heard there was there were there were free cookies and chips here for this is that I heard it was a cocktail we do doing jello shots for jello shots. Maybe maybe Hilaria Baldwin is giving away like free lessons in Spanish if. Okay, maybe.

Who knows. I know I can't help but I promise no Ilaria Balwyn stories, but I just can't help it. I don't I don't know what's happening. What was there with jello shots? Was it like bang energy folks were there giving away shooting out the dollar guns like. I don't know. What am I meant. It was my vote that you didn't vote. I know. I'm just here for the fun. Oh. What is going on here?

I gave you both sides now reasonable people listening to my show can say that sounds like a pretty. Sounds like a pretty stupid explanation to me. But again, you know, you think the media would look into this, Joe, just a bit, there's this little discrepancy in Pennsylvania. Who the hell shows up to vote and doesn't vote is if we listen. I love our constitutional republic and representative democracy. I have never once showed up to vote to hand that an empty ballot be like I'm here in this great.

I just came to meet all the candidates outside, but not actually vote for any of them. Read the whole article, just the News.com in the show notes today. All right, I want to move. I got a couple other things about this, including this video, which I'll get you right quick, as they say, down here in the south right after this other story, because it's important. I just wanted to bunk some more fake news click bait.

I know we already know the media's phony and fake e-mails. Dan, why do you waste time on the media? Your answer? I don't know the shows for you, and a lot of you hate it, but sometimes I see stories that are so stupid. I and I have some personal knowledge and expertise to them that I just, again, want to prove to you what you already know. I know it annoys some. I'm very sorry. You might believe it.

Honest, I don't want to know you, but check this one out from The Washington Post. It's just absolute fake news. Carol Pfennig put this story up in The Washington Post. This is total, you see December 30th. Twenty twenty. Secret Service to make changes to presidential detail, to bring on agents who worked with Biden. I'm not even going to put the whole article, but it's not in the show notes because I'm not going to waste to click on this.

I know, Carol. She's never been particularly rude to me or anything I've spoken to about stories in the past. But I'm telling you, the stories click bait down inside the story. It's a fake attack on Trump. The story goes like this. Folks want to give you the liberal media Carol. Letting Washington Post version just quick. Secret Service people inside the White House have been particularly loyal to Trump, and they're a big problem. In other words, like Trump corrupted the Secret Service.

So Biden's coming in and cleaning house and get rid of them, fake news, totally fake. Ladies and gentlemen, I kind of did this for a living for 12 years. I maybe know a little more than Carol and I may have sources. I've been through three presidential transitions, Clinton, but the Clinton to Bush. Bush to. But to Bush. To Obama to. Yeah, Clinton. Bush. Bush to Obama. Yeah. So presidential transitions.

I was in the Secret Service for those ladies and gentlemen, the details, the presidential details. There's changes in personnel every time because every presidential candidate that wins, whether it was Governor Bush of Texas when he became the president or Senator Barack Obama when he became the president, had details before they were president, how they had a Secret Service detail. Yes. We have a consensus candidate nominee operation section, when you are a credible candidate for president and you meet certain requirements, you get a big detail, a pretty big one.

Candidate Obama and candidate Hillary and candidate Bernie Sanders and candidate Donald Trump all had protection details. And a lot of those people on those details become familiar to the candidate who then becomes the president, who says, I'd like this guy around. This is not news, but of course, The Washington Post has to take an opportunity, big Trump corrupted the Secret Service, their political allies. We have to clean house it's click bait persona garbage to Hilaria Baldwin, a Eliab Basara butler.

How you say garbage bussau? But the fake story. The story is what? Secret Service detail changes like it has every single time a president has come in the White House. Of course, they can't write that, so it has to be disguised as a hit on Trump corrupted. The Secret Service agents have to go. By the way, I know the agents by name. I worked with them specifically. One of them was one of my supervisors is now taken over the guys, the most apolitical guy in human history.

He couldn't care less about your politics. The guy mentioned in the piece, this guy, Dave Cho, he doesn't care about your politics at all. What's a policy? I remember everybody remembers Dave, great guy, terrific guy. He does not care at all zero about anybody's politics. Please stop the insanity.

Poor Dave, I just meant that most apolitical guy ever just does his job. You know what I remember about Dave, if you missed a period in a document that was 700 pages long, this guy would catch it. He had an eye for detail like I've never seen in my life. If I page seventy two, you miss the period, the sense you be like, hi, how did you figure that out? The story's garbage. All right.

Moving on this video. You know, let me just play this, this is an expert witness at the Georgia Senate hearing they did on election integrity yesterday. This video is about a job we didn't cut. This was like two minutes long, right. I was going to know. I think I did. I cut the beginning, maybe a little, but I'm not sure this is on my Bonjean report. We did. OK, good. So this is on my Bungeni report, Rumball Account.

We have a number of different rumball accounts. We have D'banj Shobanjo clips and Bongino report. Subscribe to all of them because there's stuff on each that's unique. I want you to listen to this expert witness he makes. He just comes right into it, right into the club, making the astonishing claim that they have hacked into right now one of the systems in the Georgia Senate race going on right now. Check this out.

This is crazy at this very moment at a polling location in the county. Not only do we now have access to the devices, to the poll had the system, but we are in and it's not supposed to have Wi-Fi and that's not supposed to be able to happen. So we've dockett documented it. Now it's communicating two ways in real time. I mean, it's receiving data and sending data should never happen. Shouldn't be Wi-Fi. We've now documented it in real time so we can shut down the data.

But that's going on right there where everybody's voting. And I just wanted to get it into the record.

Thank you, Mr. Fitzgerald. Is it a mobile precinct or is it a no, it's a standing building that this should not happen and B, shouldn't happen in any way. But this is another one in real time, undisclosed location because every location is being checked. But we've now confirmed 100 percent. Right.

Thank you, sir. Sir, did you and now come to Virginia. Did you have a question? OK, Senator Taylor, thank you. Thank you for your testimony. We've heard that there's three different types of machines, a scanner about market device in a polling pad. Do you know which one it is communicating?

Or can you tell us right now what you heard in the past was coming to the thermostat and stuff? This is now a more direct access way. And so this is coming through the polling pad device where they're checking everything. But now it only takes one device where you daisy chain them together and do it. The most important thing is that shouldn't be too long and even shouldn't be accessible are on. And it's there whether. Any questions. Can I ask him one question?

What effect could somebody with, you know, dishonest purposes, what what could that person do given this access that's going on right now in Fulton County?

Statistically, what can be going on when you have an operation like this is as that data's being exchanged and somebody is in it can actually siphon off that data, modify the data and feed it right back into the system, huh?

I'm not like this is I just, you know what, you know what what do I find tragically? I mean I mean, tragically humorous about this. This is an expert witness. This is not some like Salem witch trial. This is a Georgia state Senate on election integrity. An expert witness that everyone's agreed to hear, he's not some clown or just showed up. Talking about how they just hacked into an actual polling location, the guy's Segway. It's not a mobile location, not an actual polling location to the pad.

And no one in the media wants to touch it. Nobody at the conspiracy theory, it is where where's the key saying he's there right now? If he so he's testifying under oath. They've hacked into a voting location right now. And nobody nobody seems to care at all. Just weird how if you're not watching my show, you're not going to see it anywhere, anywhere else. Oh, my gosh. Disappointing. Where's the media? We don't have it, they're reporting on fake Washington Post stories about how the Secret Service has been corrupted by Trump.

Are you going to change people out? Wasting everybody's time. Of course. Watch that video, by the way, our Rumball Bongino report. If you go to Bungeni report, it's a separate account and Rumball. Other than that, check them out. We got another bunch of great videos here. All right. Let me get to my second sponsor today. And then coming up next, I got a follow up to my Facebook story yesterday. We did it again.

We are at full blown war with Facebook, just like Mark Levin, who tonight is his last day on Facebook. Congratulations, the great one. He is moving to parler full time and getting off a Facebook. I got an update on our Facebook story yesterday. We were I'm a man of my word. I told you we were doing it again and Facebook came right back. So we're in full blown war right now. Let's go to my second sponsor, dear friends again yourself.

Ladies and gentlemen, Sharmini is extended their Christmas and holiday season sale for a limited time. Give yourself the gift of looking years younger with Sharmini. Brand new, exotic, deep correcting serum, absolutely free with your honor.

The news keep correcting serum from Sharmini means skin smooth is so free from redness, acne and acne scars and faster collagen production. Who's better than you? So it increases firmness. Smoothness diminishes adult acne, redness and stress breakouts. You can even say goodbye to those dreaded crow's feet and laugh lines. And with its immediate effects, he results in twelve hours or less. Got a hot date. Try the immediate effects. Everyone will see the difference. Guaranteed a one hundred percent of your money back.

That's the Sharmini promise. Visit Jenny Cellcom. That's Jenny s. We all love promo codes. Here it is Dan four zero Dan Fortia Check out for even more holiday savings.

Treat yourself get Yemeni's brand new Tzadik deep correcting serum crystals at home Micra Dermabrasion treatment exfoliating mask and a surprise luxury gift all free with your Roder today Plus free upgrade to priority shipping that's you sell GTA new CEO Dotcom Jenny Subcommission Yucel Dotcom Promo Code Danford zero at checkout. So I warned you about Facebook, how they're actively engaged in election interference right now. There's no doubt they interfered in my mind in the twenty twenty election with their ridiculous censoring of conservative pages, their fake fact checks, which are really liberal opinion checks.

So I discussed yesterday how Facebook put a fact check on a segment I did on Raphael Warnock, Democrat, radical leftist, running for the Senate against Kelly Lefler in Georgia, how Pastor Raphael Warnock gave a sermon about how America should renounce whiteness. I'm not going to do this segment three times. It's obvious that that statement is is a racist statement. Renounce whiteness and renounce what? So, in other words, is something wrong with your whiteness? So you should renounce it again.

That's just common sense for liberals who are idiots don't understand that because they're morons and whatever you get. So I said to you now because I hate Facebook and I'm planning my exit from Facebook along with Mark Levin. And by the way, Facebook has no idea what's coming. No idea. I can't say a lot, but it ain't just me and AIDS. The word is going to be gone. A lot of us are going to be answered right now.

I use Facebook to abuse them and to advertise other platforms and to make sure I get my ideas out there. But Facebook's days, I assure you, amongst conservatives are going to be numbered. They have the dumbest business model ever. So I said to you, apparently Facebook wants to give it in kind donation to Raphael Warnock by not letting people see without a fake fact check in front of it, that Warnock has made statements that are unquestionably, by any definition of the word racist.

No one should have to renounce the color of their skin. Because renouncing the color of their skin, having done nothing wrong, makes you a racist because you're judging them by the color of their skin. Again, Joe is the audience ombudsman. Is there anything scandalous about what I just said? Just checking the scandals there.

OK, I'm just I'm just checking. So WARNOCK'S statements, which we quoted Facebook doesn't want because Facebook wants to give it in kind donation to. So I said to you, I'm going to post it again yesterday and we did. And this is what happened. Facebook strikes back again. This is a screenshot of the business side of my Facebook account. A post shared by your page is missing context. And what do they do? They post the same article by fake news specialist Matthew Brown, who we exposed yesterday explaining how condemning whiteness is actually condemning racism.

What they shared the exact same article, the exact so the post I put up, you just covered covering so. We're going to post that again today in a double barrel index finger, you get the point to Facebook three days in a row, we're going to matter of fact, I'm thinking to my Facebook guys, because we have a big team of people, Joe, Drew, Paul, it's not just us to my Facebook guys who manage the Facebook account.

I think we should post it every day until January 5th, the election. What do you think, Joe? You down with that, Paul? How do you feel every day that we're going to a banner? We don't care all you will be doing it. Facebook is losing money. You know, it's a publicly traded company. Facebook to all the shareholders. Out to what? Facebook. Listen to me. You have no idea what's coming. I can't tell you when if it's not a stock advice show.

I'm simply telling you right now you have no idea what's brewing behind the scenes with conservatives. Your days are numbered. Multimillion dollar Facebook accounts, if you are a shareholder, are getting ready to leave you guys adro, you have no idea what's coming. Keep it up. Ban me tomorrow. I don't care where it open what you are not going to affect me. What? You are only making my life easier. As we transition off the show with a fake, your website is How You're a Moron company run by left wing Embezzles.

It's not just Facebook, by the way. To tech tyranny, stories are important and you have to hear more. I mean, of course, we always go to Facebook and Twitter and Google, but there are others out there. The media, any time they sense that it's more of a symbiont I have it listed here is the media big tech symbol, you know, like you read comic books, Venom, the Eddie Brock Venom symbiote that this alien that.

And it creates a costume for Eddie Eddie Brock like a symbiote. They exist together. The media and big tech are a symbol to the liberal media, uses big tech to censor narratives when they feel like they've lost control of a story. Overly complicated way examples are always better. What happened before the election? Hunter Biden and his dad were exposed as being in the pocket of the communist Chinese government, selling out the country to enemies of the United States.

Who a nuclear powered kind of a big story. No, that anybody hear about it? No, because big tech in the liberal media, liberal media didn't cover it, ignored it intentionally. We already have the CNN tapes. And big tech did what they disabled, The New York Post, his account, and you couldn't share the link because they want to see is there any more evidence liberal in big tech or a Symbian they will go after and attack anyone?

I've used my example on Facebook everywhere. Anyone? Who aligns with free speech mentality with a free speech, anyone, any tech platform you've seen the attacks on parler, which I have an equity stake in. You've seen the attacks on Rumball, which I have an equity stake, and you've seen the attacks on any website out there. Here's another one, look at this article in The New Yorker, I want you to read this. You know what substance is?

Substory is a news publishing platform. Not it's not news. It's almost like the old Tumblr. If you have a news blog, a news site, whatever it may be, you go to substance. And my my pal, how am I doing this? You put like in we we're on substance. I don't know what our account is, but just look for us, Dan Bongino. But we're on substance and you can basically email out your newsletters every day.

Dana Bash is on there and others. Hmm. So here we go. The New Yorker, The New Yorker. Not happy that they couldn't convince you the tape was real, the collusion hoax was real, and that Spygate was fake is upset because substract people are on their do real journalism and The New Yorker can't censor it. Here's the article. The New Yorker is Substract Media Future. We want the real title of that piece should be is Substract not under our control because we're terrified of free speech, free speech, not being able to control it.

So should we get rid of subsect? Look at it. Here's they go after everyone. Everyone. What's driving them crazy is that Dana Loesch, a prominent conservative activist, radio host in her own right, is on substance and has one of the more well followed blogs and newsletters on their. That drives them wild, Joe, you can't have data and data laughs She likes the Second Amendment. You can't have her speaking freely on substract. So The New Yorker has the right to attack piece hinting the subsect.

You better get rid of the data lest you get it. This is what they do. Yes. The media the liberal media hates free speech. It's bizarre. And anyone who talks out of turn like Dana has to come under attack. Look at a screenshot from The New Yorker piece and listen. Catch the hint, the implication. They don't say it outright because the media doesn't want to be in a piece saying, hey, we hate free speech.

So they just wink and nod. Let me read this quote from the piece. You'll get what I'm talking about. Quote New Yorker, It's an interesting time for such a hands off free market approach.

It is. I thought that's what we did, like free speech stuff. You have to have an interesting time for that. That's how they set it up. It goes on the Internet. Now, here, here's the hit piece. Here's the head piece. The Internet is flooded with disinformation. Yes. From The New Yorker that told us the hoax was real. The Internet is flooded with disinformation and conspiracy theories.

You mean like the collusion hoax? Amazon self publishing arm has become a haven for extremist content. Here we go, Joe. The flattening effect of digital platforms has led to confusion among readers about what is reporting and what is opinion. Newsrooms at the Times. The Wall Street Journal taking pains to distinguish their work from the tweets from the op ed sections stack as advertised itself as a friendly home for journalism. But few of its newsletters publish original reporting. The majority offer personal writing, opinion pieces, research and analysis.

Who is this by Pollos and a Weiner. Is that it is, folks. I listen, these are not brought up to you these specific stories about tech tyranny and the liberal symbiote, they are not brought up to you to beat a dead horse they brought up to you. So you understand the fight we're in and why me and my business partners are building an entire parallel economy right now. There's a lot going on. Trust me, I'm not done with parler and Rumball.

I am actively involved in building for you the audience out there and everyone else, an entire free speech ecosystem where you can exist free of censorship. The media doesn't want that. The media wants to be able, through The New Yorker and The New York Times to dictate to you that the Hunter Biden story is fake and the hoax is real. And they they flip the script when people go on substance and say otherwise by saying, look, this is all disinformation, Dana Bash and others are posting on there is this real journalism.

You see the attack, this happens every single time, the media, The New York Times and The Washington Post, the pinnacle, the top of the totem pole, the point on the pyramid of disinformation, people who have lied to you from that from the 50s onward telling you the Soviet Union was a model economy, that Donald Trump was a Russian trader, that Nikki Haley hung drapes paid for by Hillary Clinton, that Don Junior got a back channel to WikiLeaks, that Michael Flynn got reached out to the Soviet days, is emigre, this Soviet counterpart, before they won the election, all false.

That's them at The New Yorker, and because they don't like that, they couldn't convince you Soviet style Pravda like that, these fake stories were false, that people who are the truth tellers are accused of doing disinformation campaigns on subsect. It's going to get worse, it's going to get a lot worse. Get ready for the fight ahead. I'm telling you right now, folks. Everyone is going to be under attack soon, your payment systems for your business, you put a Facebook post up, supported Donald Trump.

Someone in your neighborhood, in a liberal area doesn't like you. Wait till you get your payment. Systems are taken away. That's going. Oh, no, that's not going to happen. Trust me. It's happening right now. All right, move it, because I got a lot of heavy news day today, by the way, I just want to just plug something quick. Bungeni Report.com is our news aggregator. It is our conservative alternative to Drudge who has now left you.

We really appreciate that website's been exploding in popularity. Bungeni report that can't make it your home. I've got big news coming ahead because about Bungeni Report.com and some content we're going to be producing in the New Year going to be really excited about because the reasons this show are sometimes I have so much news to straight, I can't get to it. I think to go into a little more detailed analysis of stories, we have an alternative coming for you soon.

I think you're really going to like sort. So stay tuned in the New Year for some exciting developments. It's stories like this. Sometimes I miss it. I've been hanging on this for a few days now. Is Nancy Pelosi in trouble in her bid for speakership? Again, in congressional terms, obviously, or just every two years, even for Nancy Pelosi? She has to run for speaker every time. Ladies and gentlemen, she's in real trouble.

Pelosi is in a world of trouble and that's why she's in trouble. One reason is obvious. She's lost a lot of seats. The Democrats lost between 12 and 15 seats, depending on how these two seats in question turn out. They've lost some seats. She needs votes to be the speaker of the House. So what's going on? Check out this PJ media piece. You can read the whole thing in detail on our newsletter. Again, Bungeni that Kamalesh newsletter.

Check it out. Here's how a Republican can end up speaker of the House instead of Nancy Pelosi. It's a long shot by Matt Margolis. Really good piece. But it's not that long of a shot. This is crazy pills. Let's go to the screen cap, number one from the piece explaining what exactly is going on. Is this really possible this is from PJ Media, quote. Well, let's see. Here's the deal, White House members can vote by proxy.

The congressional members say that's a typo. Members of Congress can vote by proxy due to emergency rules adopted in May to protect members of the House of Representative members from getting and spreading covid. But as the Hill reports, the proxy voting rules this is important expire with the new Congress requiring lawmakers to be in the Capitol in person if they want to participate in the January 3rd floor, vote for the speaker. It's a voice vote. New rules governing the 17th Congress happened after the vote for speaker.

There's another screen cap from this. But let me just explain where we are. January 3rd, the one hundred and sixteen Congress where Nancy Pelosi was the speaker, they had rules saying you can vote from your home, whatever it may be, you don't have to show up in the Capitol due to covid. Those rules expire January 3rd. The new members come in where Nancy Pelosi's majority has shrunk dramatically. She may have nothing more than a four or five majority vote.

She can't lose anyone. Well, I'm to be ridiculous. Precision matters. She can only stand to lose maybe four or five people and she'll lose her speakership. But folks, a lot of these older members. Who could be in covid danger? I don't want to go back to Capitol Hill. Oh, they can vote by proxy. No, they can't, because the rules expire January 3rd, you now have to show up if you got re-elected because the new votes for new rules, so say they wanted to reinstate that again.

So you don't have to show up here. You can vote from home in the 17th Congress for all the new members. That vote happens after the vote for speaker and the old rules has expired. It's an old rule, new rules sandwich. You get it. And stuck in the middle is you're going to have to show up and say, I vote for Pelosi on the House floor in the Capitol. Got it. Let's go on the screen, capture and see why Pelosi is in real trouble right now.

Quote, This means that candidates for speaker of the House must receive a majority of the votes cast in person to be elected speaker. Democrats already have a thin majority of two hundred twenty two seats following the twenty twenty election, and three moderate Democrats already said they're not going to vote for Pelosi when the vote takes place on January 3rd. In addition, several Democrats have health conditions that have kept them from the Capitol in twenty twenty. It would only take a small number of Democrats being exposed to covid prior to the vote.

And we don't want that, of course, for Pelosi to be.

We're not Democrats wishing ill on anyone to vote for Pelosi to potentially be in trouble. Here's a quote from a Democrat, Hank Johnson, the guy who thought Guam was going to sink covid is a wild card, said Representative Johnson from Georgia. If we have six members who can't come back and we only have a four vote majority, it throws our entire Adventism one hundred seventeen Congress in peril.

A smooth Edvin. And Guam is going to sink, that's idea, but he said that's the guy who was going to say that guy watched. If you think I'm messing with you, watch the video, Jose.

Folks, listen, we don't wish on anyone. We're not sick liberals wishing death on people, but we do live we're living in the middle of a pandemic. You have older members who are saying, hey, I'm not going there. Pelosi may not have that majority. And no, there's no voting from home, they can reinstitute the new rule, but only after the vote for speaker, you better show up. She could be in real trouble, you imagine if a Republican gets a majority of the votes in a Democrat House?

Oh my gosh, that's a long shot, granted. But wouldn't that be crazy? Bill's a Republican speaker of the House with a Democrat. I got to tell you, that would be really amazing. The chaos that would I just would be. I've never seen anything like it. My gosh. All right, moving on, folks, you still want to defund the police or motor into a lot of news stories today. Look at this video. Check this out of my Rumball account, if you to listen to an audio, you'll hear it in the background.

No rumble, dot com slash. Bongino, please subscribe. Realize that a million subscribers, which is stunning considering we just started the account a little while ago. This is what it's like, I guess, driving through New York City these days, I was a police officer in New York, so I know a little bit about New York and Manhattan was an agent there for the New York field office for a while as well. So, you know, crime and punishment, all that kind of stuff, a little bit of an idea how it goes down.

Apparently, this dude was driving down the street in New York, a couple of people decided they were just going to destroy his car in broad daylight. Check this out. It's like. O o o Rumbold Dotcom Bongino, if you would like to watch that video, what is it about the.

40 minute mark or something in the show. So want to define the we think that's a good idea. Ladies, gentlemen, what's going on right now? Well, as I've told you a thousand times, this political turn we've seen in the country amongst radical leftist nuts, people like Raphael Warnock and John USCIRF running for the Senate in Georgia, who you should vote against. Absolutely. But then there's fraud, folks. Listen, I don't know what to tell you.

There was fraud in my election. Do I still ran? Hopefully we can win enough votes to be protesting the election and giving it to the other side is insane. I'm sorry. We can fight the fight. We can do two things at the same time. This defund the police attitude, I've explained to you from my friends who are actual police officers now and some have just retired, have led to political attacks against the cops, political attacks that have the cops afraid to do their jobs because they know they want to have political backup if something goes bad.

So what happens, Joe? You get a call, you get a 911 call, a person on a corner being mugged. You go over there. If someone's not being mugged, it looks like a fight. Whatever. Some guy and another guy, both of them don't want anything to do with the police. You'd ordinarily run a background check on both of them. You know what you do? You drive by, you roll down the window. Hey, what's going on?

Everything's all right here. Don't you worry about it, OK? They drive off no further investigation. Then they're derelict in their duty. No, they show up. The first person whips out the camera the minute they can go, oh, we didn't ask to be here. Someone else call. And what if you think I get sued? Loses his job. And Mayor de Blasio up in New York takes a victory lap because he got another cop fired.

They're just rational maximizers. They're not getting involved in a situation. No one wants to involve them. In the past. They get out, check some IDs, maybe you got a pat down. If you had some kind of weapon bulging out of some, that's not happening. So what happens to cops leave the two guys who are fighting who now say they're not fighting, go back to fighting again. One shoots the other guy and you get a murder.

That wouldn't happen under a regular regime where you would have had political leaders who backed up the cops. That's what's happening. Do a vehicle stop, you smell some weed, whatever it may be, what you know, in the past, you may say you can get out of the car, sir. What happens now? Joe. But I stay here. Sabri. They're not doing anything. Because the politicians will not back them up. So what's been the result of that?

Well, I found an interesting account of social media. Here are tweets from a guy named Jeff Asher who's been covering this. Apparently, he does crime statistics. Here are some screenshots of his tweets. The result of not having police do police stuff because you're not backing them up. We're at the end of twenty twenty, and here is the first national murder update of 20 20 murders, up thirty six point seven percent in 57 agencies with data through at least September.

The most don't have data through November. Murder is up in fifty one of fifty seven, thirty seven of fifty eight agencies reporting murders, up 30 percent. It's got the spreadsheet right there for you to see. He goes on. Telling you in this second tweet how bad this really is, this pattern, ladies and gentlemen, there are people dying. This isn't a talking point. This isn't some kind of nonsense political a focus group tested talking point.

These are real people with real families who are now dead. Dad. He goes on the largest national percentage increase in murder ever reported since 1960 was twelve point seven percent. In 1968, the largest raw number of murders increase was one thousand nine hundred thirty eight 1990. A 15 percent increase this year and this guy thinks it'll be larger, would mean two thousand four hundred more murders and it'll be the worst one year increase in murder ever recorded.

What an epic tragedy. 2400 lives snuffed out that didn't have to be. Breathing, thinking, human beings who have or dads and moms and. Mazower, some of those were bad folks. That's that's listen, this is that that's not a real argument. These are people these are human beings, lives snuffed out, never take another breath of oxygen again. It's not a movie and this is a real world. Why, because we have feckless, gutless Testico free politicians who won't do a damn thing about the chaos on their streets.

I told you about broken windows, broken windows, policing, when you stop the little stuff, the big stuff takes care of itself. Why? Because if you let the guy jump the turnstile and look the other way when you're a cop, no big deal. The guy who jumps the turnstile is typically the guy on the train who rapes, kills or assaults someone on the train. He doesn't pay via MetroCard. The maniac's and the lunatics jumping on that BMW in the video I just played for you.

You think these people are incapable of burglaries, home invasions, assaults?

They assaulted a guy. Refiguring. And I'm going to beat the crap out of him, too. When you arrest them and take care of them and you know you'll be backed up. You don't have the burglaries and home invasions later because they're in jail. It's not hard to figure out. Of course, this affects minority communities and poor communities. The worst, because what happens in rich communities, in rich communities, you see this Washington Examiner story will have in the show notes.

What do they do? They just hire private police forces. So they are OK, don't you worry about them. Zak Farrell, Washington Examiner. Wealthier communities will turn to private policing as cities deplete their own police departments. Folks will be OK, my sheriff's great, but again, the Bosio and the liberal Democrat communists that run your cities, that some people in New York, some listening is continue to vote for. Our defenestrated and defunding your police while you're attacked, while we're OK, we got our private police force, but they're in it for the little guy, right?

It's the Republicans and we're defending you. Conservatives like me. I'll be fine. This has nothing to do with me. My neighborhood is OK. Our police force here do not drive in my neighborhood, commit a crime. Trust me, there's a bridge to get in here. Bad idea. I'm calm, cool, I am OK. I mean, this fight for you is not a joke. I'm doing it on my show right now. And yet you continue to vote for people who are making the wealthy safer while you can't even drive down a street in New York City.

Skip ahead, Paula, because I do want to get to these stories. And teased him for a couple of days, it's it's frustrating and really is it's just frustrating and stupid. Again, we wake up every morning on this show trying to explain to you the forest fire, cancer and wart on the collective arse of humankind that liberalism is it is a forest fire and stupid people. I said it on Hannity guest hosting the other night. Stupid people align with liberalism because only stupid people can't figure out the forest fire it is.

I just showed you the video and then that's just one video where I could sit here all day and play this stuff. This was not happening in Rudy Giuliani's New York City. I was there. Or candidly, in Bloomberg's either where he followed a lot of Giuliani's policing fares, fair guys, crazy on guns, Bloomberg off the rocker, but they followed the same broken windows. Policing and crime continue to go down. Fair is fair. Then the ball came in and the place is escape from New York Snake Plissken style.

What a joke. All right, moving on, different direction, but a story I've been teasing all week, very important. This Wall Street Journal story is fascinating. I have warned you repeatedly for four years now about the dangers of a fiat digital currency. In other words, governments around the world are saying we got to get away from this cash thing. They're using all kinds of bogus excuses. One of them is drug dealers are using the hundred dollar bill that folks cash is.

Of course, cash is always going to be that maybe get rid of cash. There are dangers, big dangers. The Wall Street Journal stories brilliant. China envisions its digital currency future with lotteries and a year's worth of laundry. In the latest trial, residents of SAOs, you want a share of 20 million digital want to spend online or offline purchases. Let me summarize this headline. There's a lot in there. And why the dangers of getting rid of cash?

That's what this segment is about. What's going to happen to you if this happens? Major League. No, no. China, of course, which is the world's largest surveillance state and the number one enemy of the United States there straight up communist, they're not hiding it. Liberals here try to hide it. They're communists, too, of course. And liberals who want to get rid of cash in the United States have the same goals. The Chinese the Chinese want to get rid of cash.

The Chinese government, they want a digital currency. So they did like a lottery show. They're like, hey, it's a sucker born every day. We'll give you a whole bunch of free money. All you'll get is an app.

And you get to go and spend the money and think that everybody was like, yes, I can't wait to download this app.

Well, what will happen afterwards? Well, what are the two things that happen? I've, again, repeatedly have to warn you about here. If you get rid of cash and you go to a government currency, which the government can track, well, number one, the government will track you what you're buying, what you're selling, what they don't want, you buying what they don't want you selling because it's a digital currency that leaves a digital footprint.

Cash that doesn't do that. OK. From the Wall Street Journal story, China's doing this right now. This will be coming here soon. You've been warned a thousand times. Here's a thousand one from the Wall Street Journal piece for the central bank. Part of the appeal. This is in China of the new digital currency. It's to create a public alternative to Alibaba, intention's payment duopoly and to gain more access to transaction data. Oh, says Martin Sharp Zamba, I'm saying your name or he's a research fellow at the Economics Institute.

So they want more access to your transaction, what you buy. Why would a government want that? Gee, I don't know, maybe like to track if you bought a firearm once so they can put together a little registry behind the scenes of who has a firearm and who doesn't. So they can come take it from me. Oh, what a conspiracy theory is it really? Everybody thought Spygate was a conspiracy theory to too till it actually happened. You really want the government having open access to all your transactions?

What if we get a little nudge approach? I catch such the Cass Sunstein where you go and buy cigarettes because you're a smoker and the government learns about it because all the currency is digital and then they you're getting Medicaid, Medicare payments and all of a sudden they stop your Medicaid payments because they know you're a smoker. Oh, wow. I didn't really think of that one. Why did I use that second example? Because the first one, obviously was one that appeal to conservatives who are Second Amendment advocates who don't want the government know if you bought a gun or not.

It's none of their business. It's your right to buy a gun. You know, the whole keep and bear arms Second Amendment thing, I don't know if the liberals read the Constitution, but the second one more aligns with liberals who like this idea. Liberals, do you love Medicaid, Medicare? Any time the government spends our money on us, liberals think it's free money. You want your free money disappear because the government found out you're buying cigs every day.

What about alcohol? Buying it every Saturday night? Little, huh? Well, Dana, I want to live long now. A lot to buy alcohol anyway. You lose your Medicaid benefits. That can't possibly happen here. You sure. You sure about the. So the number one downside of a fiat digital currency is you'll be subjecting yourself to a surveillance state, monitoring everything you're buying. Sounds like a big two thumbs down or to me, zero stars on Amazon for that one.

But even worse, it's a little wonky, but not to want. And this is where the warning came in when I covered this, I don't know, three years ago, we did a story. Whole show was very popular about negative interest rates.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Don't worry. Audience archives. Dude, you don't have to play. She sends me that. She's just so much work. We love her to death. I hope everything's going OK. We love audience archives. She's been with me from the beginning, Judy. She's the best. But I did a show a long time ago about negative interest rates. What does this have to do with digital currency and surveillance, digital?

What the hell are negative interest rates? Well, what's in it for a positive interest rates? I lend Joe money at five percent interest. Joe pays me back at the end of the year. The hundred dollars I lent them plus five percent. So he gives me one hundred five dollars.

Easy peasy. He keeps the house a negative interest rate.

Negative interest rate is island Joe one hundred dollars and Joe gives me back ninety five dollars and I actually lose. Well why the hell would I lend Joe a hundred dollars back? You have to make a lot of sense, does it? So why the hell would government's like negative interest rates? Well, let's go back to part two of this Wall Street Journal piece and you'll see what I mean. Quote Wall Street Journal. Analysts have separately predicted the new currency could allow the central bank to put negative interest rates on cash and extreme economic circumstances to encourage consumers to spend oh oh, now it makes sense.

So the government in China, which a lot of government figures here, especially liberals aligned with Chinese communist values, sadly, some a little too much like soire off, you know what I mean?

Nonalignment know. This is a double A. This is a double spectacular whammy for them. So, number one, the government, which owns 27 million, which owes 27 trillion dollars, the United States government. No one, if they if if they were to go to negative interest rates through the central bank, negative, not positive interest rates. Negative interest rates are always great for debtors. I just gave you the example, if you owe money to someone you love, negative interest rates, how terrific.

If I lent you one hundred dollars and he thought he was going to have to pay me plus five percent. At the end of the year, he told me one hundred and five dollars. But say in the middle of the year, the government changes and it goes and pushes negative interest rates and a lot of these indexes are indexed to what the government does to its central bank. It's supposed to be independent. That's obvious. What better deal for Joe?

Hey, Ted, I thought I owed one hundred and five, but according to the contract we have, we indexed to the government. Now I only 095, what a deal for everybody who are debtors, who is the biggest debtor in the world. Out that hurt. Who's the biggest debtor in the world, the US government? Twenty seven trillion dollars. What a deal. You get negative interest rates, the government doesn't have to pay you twenty seven trillion dollars depending on how low they go.

Maybe they only have to pay back twenty five trillion. Negative interest rates kind of sound like a tax to me. Government borrowed money from us and gives us back less. But what's the problem with negative interest rates and what does that have to do with digital currency? You're going to keep your money in a bank if the interest rates are negative. So you're a creditor, you give your money, the bank, Paula. Stop me if this doesn't make sense.

She loves economics. She thought she loves it. You have a thousand dollars in a bank account. Bank says, hey, dad, Danno. Sorry, pal. Negative five percent interest rate this year. Government says so. What are you doing? You're going to the bank to get your cash out. Right, or else it's just going to whittle away the negative, meaning it's going down. So what happened when they tried negative interest rates in Japan?

What became a booming industry right away, Joseph, I know, saves the saves.

Everybody went to the bank, pulled out their money. You can't take a negative rate from cash. One hundred dollar bill is one hundred dollar bill. You leave it in the bank, it's not a hundred dollar bill, it's ninety five dollars, it took it out, put it in their home safes, look it up, Japan, negative interest rate safes, put it in a search engine. I'm not making it up. Again, what does this have to do with digital currency?

If you didn't have cash to put in a safe and it was only digital, it could just take it from you right on your phone. Greatest tax ever. So next time you hear about the wonders of digital currency, you know, maybe the U.S. government wants this idea, they'll send you a little QR code with free money, give them that double barreled index finger. It's a really, really bad idea. It is the worst tax you would ever see in your life.

Work for money, put in a bank government told me I had less. Of course they did. We can talk about fiat digital currency, I'm not talking about Bitcoin, I love block chain that I didn't used to, but I'm falling for a quick one of my business partners. Huge into Bitcoin, knows everything about it. All right. I do want to get these last two stories because I don't do a lot of national security stuff. It's the yesterday.

But I found this story upon Gino Report.com, our news aggregator that's put together by Matt. I make suggestions, but. Matt Polumbo, my excellent editor over there, he goes out and calls the Internet Combs excuse me, the Internet finds the best stories. I found the story yesterday upon a report that was caused by the military. Folks, they have a devastating new weapon. Did you hear about these, Joe, the Air Force has these. No, they call them rods.

Rods from God. That could hit with the force of a nuclear weapon, Blake Stillwell, military dot com again is up a bungeni report.com. I think it's still there. What are these things? Well, we have obvious problems with nuclear weapons as fallout, nuclear radiation that stays around forever. And obviously they kill a lot of people. So we've been trying to think for years, like, how do we develop a weapon that could hit with the kinetic energy and do that kind of destruction, taking out Saddam Hussein's bunker or military targets, whatever may be without having to deal with the nuclear fallout, the radiation and all the other horrible problems that would occur with, obviously, in a nuclear war.

This is an incredible idea. Tungsten rods, those are really, really heavy from the piece. So what do they do? This is called Geo Project Thor. So what they're talking about a project through a little background during the Vietnam War, we used to just drop empty shells by the thousands. The empty shells would just land like bullets from the sky and destroy everything. So they thought, well, what if we did that with not just from planes, but if we did it with super heavy tungsten rods and we did them from space.

Wow. So Thor uses large projectiles from a few thousand miles above the earth. These tungsten right, like big spears rods from God idea was a bundle of telephone poles style tungsten rods dropped from a space orbit, reaching a speed of 10 times the speed of sound. This doesn't sound good. If you get hit by this, it sounds that could be really bad. The rod itself would penetrate hundreds of feet into the earth, destroying any hardened bunkers or secret underground sites.

More than that, when the rod hits, the explosion would be on par with the magnitude of a ground penetrating nuclear weapon. But with no fallout. Why do I put these national security? I don't do a lot of national security. Why do I put that out there? Because the China and Russia and all our other adversaries who are thinking about toying around with us, we are still the United States of America and we will figure it out. Nobody wants war, it should be the last option.

Go to a search engine, wouldn't you want to know when we should go to with best way I've ever heard it summed up the great Fox Konner about war. Never go to war alone. Never go to war for long. And never go to war unless you absolutely have to. But if we have to go to war, having a bunch of couple thousand pound tungsten rods, a thousand feet, the air hanging over above your nuclear bunkers in Russia, and it sounds like a big deterrent.

Don't mess with us, please, seriously, please don't do it. We will figure it out, one more story to USA Today, this Nashville attack that you've heard about. Ladies and gentlemen, the golden rule of security. My last line of work, never, ever, ever in a in any circumstance, under any circumstances, allow a single point failure in security ever. What do I mean by that? Look at the story in USA Today, which occasionally when they're not doing fake fact checks with Matthew Brown, there's actual acts of journalism, Nashville bombing fros, wireless communications and expose the Achilles heel and regional networks.

How do we still have these Achilles heels? From the story, this explosive that went off in front of this Nashville AT&T center was a single point failure, said Doug Schmidt of Vanderbilt professor. He said that's the Achilles heel, the weekly weak link. One thing goes wrong, everything comes crashing down. Now, the Tennessee Emergency Communications Board is called a special meeting for next week to address the impact to 911 one operations as a result of the bombing in downtown Nashville, according to public notice folks.

We haven't thought this through yet. You know, again, I gave you a good news, bad news, the good news is our military is amazing and is thinking of these advanced weapons that will hopefully stave off our enemies from ever thinking about or even digesting the idea of attacking us. The downside is domestically, I'm telling you, we're still not prepared. You had an explosive go off that knocked out the nine one one system in phone service, and you didn't think like, hey, this could happen, a bombing in the street.

We still haven't hardened our grid to a potential attack at home. That's never going to happen. Well, we said that we said a plane would never fly into a building either. And that happened to. Folks, in my prior line of work, we never, ever allowed a single point of failure ever. I'll just give you two quick examples with the Secret Service. Let's say you had a motorcade route. Like I did once in a foreign country that was compromised.

We just wound up on the front page of a paper. In Croatia, true story. You think we didn't have a back up, we had an alternate route because you have a backup. In other words, if you don't drive the motorcade route, you know, has been compromised because it's a single point of failure, you have an alternate route, meaning another point that's not a failure. And then we had another round after that. True story, though, we actually fed that motorcade route to the press people together, not joking, I'm not joking.

The press was in Croatia as the motorcade guy in Croatia. They were getting way too curious about a motorcade route. Like, why are they going like, this is some bad guy wants to take us out with an RPG.

So we were like, yeah, yeah, sure. Here's the motorcade route. We're going to go down here, wound up on the front page of paper. We did the other one, but everybody lined up on the wrong motorcade route, which is great. Yeah, sometimes we did. That's. We have hard rooms at sites with the Secret Service that we've everything breaks bad and we can evacuate a building, we have a room, we can harden up it because we don't want single points of failure.

To all the people out there listening, we have a big audience who are county commissioners. Mayors, local mayors, small towns, you got to think this through. Do you have a single point of failure in your jurisdiction, your 911 one center? Is it exposed? What's the backup, if you thought this through? Again, my prior line of work, you can't solve every contingency, but you can think things through and at least have an A to B plan.

We used to have an A to Z plan, but sometimes even Z breaks down. But she got to have a plan, this is unforgivable, bomb goes off, the whole 911 system went down in that area. That's insane. Is America 2020, we've got to figure this stuff out. All right, folks, that was a loaded show today. Humble request. Please check us out again. I keep pumping Bungeni Report.com because we're putting a lot of work into it.

We really want a good news aggregator there for you. And we would love to be your home in the morning, the afternoon and your first site for news when you go there. We don't pump a lot of our own stuff. We celebrate a lot of other conservative outlets, national polls, Washington Examiner, Daily Caller, all of them. You'll find all their stuff at Bungeni Report. Dotcom, please check it out. Exciting news about that in the new year.

And please subscribe to my Rumball account for the video version of the show Rumball Dotcom Bungeni. We're almost to a million subscribers. Thanks a lot, folks. I'll see you tomorrow.

You just heard Dan Bongino.