Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.

You know, folks, I was skeptical of the results, air quotes, results of the 2020 election. I think that's obvious if you listen to my show. But I read a piece this morning Rand Paul had put out in his social media accounts. And I have to tell you. Without an ounce of hyperbole blew my mind. These statistical anomalies, folks, make absolutely no sense, here's I'm going to talk about on today's show, I got a big announcement I'll make right at the beginning.

I don't want to wait till the end. I'm not going to put it. All right. But here's the anomaly. Here's the core of it that I'm going to talk about today. It's not unusual to have big ratios in elections. You know, you can have a small town where 18 out of 20 people vote for Biden. And it's not unusual to have large margins of victory. Joe Biden beat Trump by a large margin in the city of Baltimore.

But it's really, really unusual. To have both. Ow, ow, ow, ow, ow. Don't go anywhere, don't go anywhere today, show Batebi Express.

Ladies and gentlemen, protect your online activity from prying eyeballs today. Get a VPN. Don't wait. Go to express VPN. Dotcom Bongino. Welcome to the Dan Bongino show. There's going to be an explosive week producer. Joe, how are you? Fine, sir, on this incredible Monday.

No, I'm doing very well, Dan. Very well. And just ready for the show. So here we go.

Yeah, well, that was very sound. Super exciting. Yes. I was so excited before the show. What happens when you take a Valium? Come on, guy. Coach, stand time. Come on, guys. Get in the game tonight. Hey, big announcement. Maybe it's because, Joe, you did an energy dump after I told you what was going to happen. So Joe knows it's we have an outstanding interview this week. Lieutenant General Mike Flynn, yes, yes, yes, we will be interviewing him this week to air later in the week, details to come.

You're probably not going to want to miss that one.

I'm just guessing it's throwing that out there. All right. Let's get to it today. Showboating by Ventura. They make the most incredible looking watches. You know how I know? Because I have one on right now. I wear them on the show and I get probably 20 or 30 emails a week from people going, hey, what's that what you wear on your show? It's Ventura van S.R.O.. The best part, they're affordable. Why waste money on overpriced watch?

That looks terrible. You get a better look and watch. This is my personal fave, the altitude blue face brown leather band. I had my second black band, Blue Face, as well as the altitude as well and green. To avoid the rush of last minute gifts, we're going to give you exclusive access to an early site wide sale of Ventura watches dot com slash Bongino get up to 15 percent of all products. Seriously avoid the rush of last minute gift shop.

The sale right now I give these gifts. People absolutely love them. Ventura sent over some of their new stuff in their new watches. They just keep getting better. They sent some for my wife as well. They make the perfect gift, especially with the holidays coming up. Look at the beautiful Paula. They're nice night. There's a watch and a picture. Plus, they offer engraving on the back of their watches. So pick out a watch and write something special on the back for that loved one with Ventura, there's no brand name Mark-Up, no big time price tags that promised you a simple, well-made products that are simple and you'll enjoy where they know how important it is to shop from local plans.

You brands you can trust. Ventura offers free shipping. Thirty day returns guarantees your watch for two years. They believe in what they're doing, so their customers give them the best reviews. That's why they have over twenty five thousand five star reviews. You're not going to find a better looking watch. It's better made for this. Could have a price anywhere. I don't wear anything else. My listeners have been the hero for Ventura this year. The guys Ventura told me they are extremely good.

Not kidding. Extremely grateful for your support. These watches have been flying off the shelves. So keep the emails, messages and letters going. But most importantly, keep supporting the show. And these great products have been Cheryll Go Shop Ventura. That's VIENE s.r.o. watches dot com slash Bongino go to my link. Ventura watches dot com sponginess. Pick out your favorite watch. Get a great discount right now. All right, let's go.

So let's get right to this, ladies and gentlemen, you know, when President Trump says something on a interview he was on, Maria Bartiromo is excellent show this week. And there's always, you know, he's hit, you know, hit the nail on the on the head when all the right people get upset by all the right people. I mean, all the losers. So whenever tator, you know, George Costanza over at CNN gets upset and what's their what's his face and loser over it.

Media, whenever they lose their marbles over an interview, you know, President Trump is typically over the target. And for all the knocks on President Trump and what he says in interviews, and there are lots of them every time he opens his mouth, some media loser has something to say when he says something that's particularly. Insightful and he's onto something maybe doesn't say it, words like, you know, he's onto something when the media loses their minds.

Let me get right to it. Here's clip number one. President Trump yesterday, and I will say this. Maybe we should get a different term for these these votes that came in late at night other than massive, massive Dub's, which I laughed at. You've got to have a sense of humor. You know, whenever we're talking about massive dumpsites conversation, you go in some disturbing directions. But listen to President Trump on a serious note, talking about these voter dumps that happened late at night.

And why was everybody upset? I'm going to tell you in a minute. Play this.

What happened if you watched the election? I was called by the biggest people saying congratulations, political people. Congratulations, sir. You just won the election. It was 10:00. And you looked at the numbers that I'm sure you felt that way. This election was over and then they did dump's they call them dump's big massive dumps in Michigan and Pennsylvania and all over.

Sorry, I'm sorry, I know it is a serious topic. Sounds like a possible drop. I assume we'll hear that again from Joe, we'll hear that in some just like his commandingly, massive dumpster, always a problem. But it could be a particular problem when these statistical abnormalities don't add up. I said to you in the opening teasing this segment. Folks, it's very possible to have ratios that let me explain this very simply, explain it, Joe.

If this doesn't make sense, I've already explained that the policy got it. You need to stop me right away, which it is not having run for office myself and been on the other side receiving ends of these these massive vote dumps, it is not uncommon for ratios to be abnormally high. It's also not uncommon for gross numbers of votes in liberal cities to go towards, you know, an excuse me net number of votes to be very high for Democrats.

Let me give you an example. You have that town and what is it, Vermont or New Hampshire every year? They're the first ones to report. They were like, oh, my gosh, this year Biden won, whatever, 18 out of 20 votes. Folks, that's not unusual. It's not evidence of fraud. You know, if you were to pick randomly a building on Central Park West in Manhattan and get 80 percent plus votes for Biden in that building, would anybody say that's evidence of fraud?

Hell, no. It's been hard. I'll give you I'll do you one better pick up a high rise in San Francisco in Nancy Pelosi's district. If you were to get a ratio of eighty five percent, Biden, 15 percent drop, would anybody be like, that's fraud? No. Ratios of votes, Democrat to Republican or Republican to Democrat in small numbers are not unusual. You track and Joe. Yeah, yeah, we're good factor, too, while we're talking about massive dumps.

The deuce factor, too, on this one. Having net numbers of votes go for one candidate in liberal areas and high numbers is not unusual either. The fact that Joe Biden got probably 20, 30 thousand, who knows how many more votes than Donald Trump in the city of Baltimore, Maryland, which is very liberal, is not unusual either. But but. But, but. Having ratio's. That are really high for one candidate and numbers. That are really high for one candidate, that drop at 4:00 in the morning.

Only in swing states that don't marry up with the ratio's the numbers elsewhere. Ladies and gentlemen. We got a problem. I want you to look at this tweet by Rand Paul that's causing all kinds of chaos again, all the right people are upset, folks. When Castanza at CNN and the media eye crew were all upset, the media I important. They're important for all the wrong reasons. They're important because people in the media read this stuff. They're the only ones who read it.

The articles get no traction anywhere, but people in the media read it. So I'm giving you a little inside baseball. Their stuff is is important. I'm not going to sell them short. But when they're upset, you know, they're all upset at Rand Paul, too, for tweeting this this morning. Here's an article in Substory Vote Pattern Analysis. This article is an absolute must read if you don't read it. I'm sorry. You've done you've done yourself a huge disservice.

Here's Rand Paul's tweet. Interesting. Trump margin of defeat in quotes in four states occurred in four data dumps between one thirty four and six thirty one a.m. statistical anomaly, fraud. Look at the evidence and decide for yourself. That is, if big tech allows you to read this anomaly's and vote counts. And he attaches the article. Folks, if if you've ever been questioning to subscribe, to subscribe to subscribe to the show notes that it's free, doesn't require anything, go to buy Jeno dot com newsletter.

This article is right there at the top. It's with the Spectator article. You don't want to miss these two articles today. You need to read this. It's very long and it's very mathematically oriented, but it is genius. Let's go to take no one from this sub stack article, which is going to bake your bagels, cook your muffins, toast your muffins, do whatever you need to do to your muffins. Read this article and your muffins will be toasted.

Vote pattern analysis and substance. He says anomaly's and vote counts and their effects on election. Twenty twenty. It's a quantitative analysis. It's very mathematical. Don't worry, I'm going to tease it out. Statistics was my thing toked repeatedly in experimental psychology and in my MBA program went the school. Nobody cares. Just saying it's not the math I'll decipher for you. Don't worry about it. Let's go to number one, where he describes this ratio versus vote counting.

By the way, I've never done nine screenshots ever from an article. That's how important this article is. And these they're going to be long, but they are worth your time. He talks about the guy who wrote this, Italo Paternalists talks about his report. He says he's only relying on publicly available data. He looked at eight thousand nine hundred and fifty four individual vote updates. We'll call these voter dumps and differences and vote totals for each candidate between successive changes to the running vote totals colloquially referred to as dumpster patches.

Listen to this, we discover a remarkably consistent mathematical property, there's a clear inverse relationship between difference and candidates vote counts and the ratio of the vote counts. In other words, it's not surprising to see vote updates with large margins, and it's not surprising to see vote updates with large ratios of support between the candidates. But it is surprising to see vote updates. Which are both. Now, again, I think I translated that preemptively with my tease and follow up, you all get it.

That makes sense, Joe. You got ratios that are high in small numbers, but you also don't get big vote differences in huge ratios. Right. Well, you do in Iraq with pre, pre and US takeover there, we you know, we freed the Iraqis and Saddam Hussein, Joe, he aced the ratio and vote difference that he aced it, Joe, he told ninety nine point nine percent. It was amazing. What a job, what a campaigner out there knocking on doors saying Saddam Hussein, you want to vote?

We love 99 percent. He pulled that off magically. There's another way to describe this I want to get to I don't want to, but the statistics will make sense. If you understand what I just said, WIDJOJO approved of and also the ratio versus vote, you get that only Saddam gets ninety nine point nine percent. But here's another way to describe this. I sample sizes grow in statistics and science. You traditionally see experimental effects are the size of them dissipate.

Let me simply translate that for you. Whether it's experimental psychology, whether it's the effect of school choice, as the sample size gets smaller, you see huge effects. I'll give you a perfect example. You take a drug for, let's say, cancer. Some drug, you give it to one person, only one, this person is extremely susceptible, susceptible to the effects that the person's magically cured in six months. We found a cure for cancer.

No, you didn't. You found a cure for that person. Now you start giving the drug Joe, to ten a hundred a thousand thirty thousand people, and all of a sudden you find that drug for cancer. May have cured that person in only 10, 20 percent of cases because of some some genetic difference in the population. As sample size increases, experimental effects get smaller and smaller and smaller. Why would we want the effect to get smaller and smaller and smaller, because we want to make sure the drug works.

That it's not some unique effect on one person, the same thing happens with vote counts. As the vote tallies get larger and larger and larger, those ratio should decrease and decrease in decrease, you shouldn't get ninety nine point nine percent Saddam Hussein numbers anywhere. You dig? I know you do the smartest audience in the business. Now that you have that background in statistics, one on one, the distribution of statistical effects over larger populations. Let's go to screenshot number two about the four most puzzling dump's.

This is great. Oh, this piece is epic. Here's a for the four most puzzling dumps where the ratios were super high. And the vote counts were high, too. Let's go to number one, quote, an update in Michigan listed as of 630 one a.m. Eastern Time on November 4th. Showed one hundred and forty one thousand two hundred fifty eight votes for Biden and five thousand nine hundred sixty eight for Trump. Wow, look at that Saddam numbers.

Saddam must have some great campaign signs that Biden. Here's number two, a three forty two a.m. batch that came in on November 4th. We chose one hundred and forty three thousand three hundred seventy nine votes for Biden and twenty five thousand one sixty three for Trump, if we go at Saddam, he's out it again. That's incredible. Knocking on doors that campaigns. I vote Saddam, Saddam, 20, 20. What the hell? Here's another one in Georgia, one thirty four a.m., November 4th, one hundred thirty six thousand for Biden, twenty nine thousand one hundred fifteen for Trump.

Man, that Biden was a camper, Biden magic everywhere, Joe, he is the last one in upstate Michigan. Oh, this one's going to cook. This one's going to cook your. What are we running out of? Food items to cook. Cook your blueberry pie was a good one, we ate that up. Fifty four thousand votes at three fifty a.m. for Biden, four thousand seven hundred for Donald Trump. Weird at by Magic Man. It was middle of the night dump's.

Those Biden dumps are powerful. When Biden dubs, it's just amazing, man. Biden's massive dumps are just the power of a Biden dump is this is just it's like roses. The aroma is everywhere. You know what's really weird about these Biden dumps? That the differences in these Biden dumps. Well enough to turn the whole election. Let's go to the next screen shot from this substract piece. You just have to read this. This one's a little shorter.

He says, we find that the extent of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia, which collectively represent 42 electoral votes.

Gee, that's kind of strange. Making lines here, so I don't forget any of these. Folks, he goes on in the next screenshot here to again discuss the critical takeaway, you can have big ratios. I can't say this enough. And you can have big skewes and votes in liberal areas, but big ratios and big skews, it's kind of weird. Those are like Kim Jong un type numbers, ninety nine point nine nine percent of the vote is in and Kim Jong un won every one crazy time.

Let's go back to this piece. Genius. There's also a number of general intuitions upon which we draw to direct our research. This is what I was taught Dwights. I talked about the sample size thing when it comes to the effect of drugs or school choice or any big sample size does matter. So you make sure it's not a unique effect to one person. He says, quote, In general, the larger the sample size, the smaller we expect the deviation from the population average to be.

Again, experimental effects tend to go down as population sizes go up. Everybody got that simple statistical tautological statement. Not while anomalous vote ratios may occur, the statistical chance of anomalous margins goes down as the size of the sample or vote up that goes up again. You have a small town, you can have a high ratio, you have a huge city. You're not going to get ninety nine percent of the vote. Something's up. That's what he means by the size of the effect goes down as the size of the sample goes up.

Take away the basic intuition here is big margins are one thing, and so we're super skewed results, but it's weird to have them both at the same time as they generally become inversely related as either value increases. That's a fancy way of saying what I just told you.

Can a big ratios or you can have big margins, but you can't have big margins with big ratios. I can't say this enough. I'm not trying to hammer you over the head with it with my gavel here. I'm trying to speak to all the lunatics that watch this show on the left that you're not curious about this. Of course you're not. You're in the media. They're not curious about anything but propaganda crossing these out as we go along here.

All right. I'm going to get to my next list goes on now. We're going to get specific. Don't go anywhere. We've got more from this excellent piece about the insane batch of votes that came in in Michigan. That makes no sense whatsoever. And how exactly when the ratios get out of skew, is there a way to hide it? In other words, Joe. Even vote fraudster's or attempted vote fraudsters aren't dumb enough to put Kim Jong un type numbers, they know they get caught.

So how do you hide that? How do you hide that? Oh, there's a way to do that, too, that shows up in the numbers. Don't go anywhere. All right, our second sponsor today. I told you the show would be killer, I know self-paced things, but this is his stuff. I'm just giving you the high points. It's ladies and gentlemen for the firearm enthusiast.

Listen, I have a lot of I have an incredible gift idea for the firearm owner in your life when it comes to training or personal defense. You all know the magazines you use are just as important as the firearm and the ammo. You carry your magazines on work. You got a paperweight. You know how difficult it can be to find durable, reliable, lightweight magazines for everyday use. That's why I chose and I'm telling you about my friends. It's been a sponsor for a long time because it's the best in the business.

Here they are. For the past six years, ETS has manufactured the toughest, roughest polymer magazines. Their impact resistant. They won't crack or break when exposed to harsh environments, chemicals or extreme cold or I might add, extreme heat or whatever else you want to subject them to. Plus, they're clear, you see right through them. Stack them beautiful. That means you can see how many rounds you have loaded. Why didn't anyone else think of this?

What a great idea. It's Magsaysay. Come with a lifetime warranty. They're available right now for Glock Smith and Wesson MP Shield S.O.P three twenty nine point ninety five AR 15 new for this year. Scorpion Evo. In these tumultuous times you need a durable and reliable magazine for every situation. Stock up today it asks mags, dotcom com mags, dot com. While you're there, don't forget their lineup of speed loaders. They're amazing. Pop the magazines seconds.

Load them up. Save your thumbs. They're the fastest in the world. That's ETF mags, dot com. Here's a promo code for you. Don't forget the URL makes that kind of promo code. Dan Dan for fifteen percent off your entire order. All right. Thanks for supporting the show. So let's get back to these very puzzling batches of votes that came in early in the morning. Gosh, that's so weird. And that let's talk specifically about the Michigan dump.

This is kind of weird. Let's get right to it now, the screen cap from this excellent piece in subsect. The Michigan dump arrived at six thirty one a.m. on November 4th and went one hundred forty one thousand two hundred fifty eight for Biden to five thousand nine hundred sixty eight for Trump. Wow. Representing both the largest vote margin for Biden of any of the five hundred to vote updates we have here at third at one hundred and thirty five thousand two hundred ninety votes of difference while representing by a factor of more than two the largest Biden Trump ratio at a whopping twenty three to sixty seven point one, the log of which is three point one six don't get too complicated with no worry about.

I'll explain all this up as we'll see when comparing with other states biometric. This is the single most anomalous point in the entire nation. A one hundred and thirty five thousand vote difference in Michigan in one data dump and a ratio that's absolutely off the charts. Again, this is crazy. We got North Korea like numbers here, just weird. These guys are such great care of the Biden magic. Joe the Biden magic rubs off on this guy. Dumps are amazing.

This guy does dumps like no other person on the planet. It's probably true in more ways than one, that Michigan dump is really weird. I had no one in the media is even remotely concerned about AIDS, and it also explains again why they want us desperately to not talk about this and why they'll lose their minds over my show today, why they lost their minds over Rand Paul's tweet and why they lost their minds over President Trump's appearance on these data dumps late at night.

Now, I said to you before, that's a really odd ratio in Michigan and really odd vote difference, which you almost never see ratios and vote differences. But if you weren't going to disguise your fraud, let's say President Trump was, let's just play a game for a minute and let's say you expected President Trump to lose or win Michigan lose by a margin of error, plus or minus three, meaning he'd win by three or lose by three based on polling.

And then all of a sudden, President Trump votes start coming in and he's winning by five or six. And you had if you had some kind of plan for fraud, you'd be thrown because you'd be like, oh, my gosh, how do we make up a five percentage point difference? Get it. How would you hide that, because you'd need extraordinary ratios of votes coming in, in high numbers to get rid of some of those votes, but you don't want Kim Jong un type numbers.

Why? Because people aren't stupid. If someone told you Detroit voted ninety nine point nine percent for Donald Trump, everybody even left this. Well, I'm probably not leftist me, they're real idiots, but I'm talking about like sane people. Everyone would be like, oh, my gosh, that sounds awfully strange for Detroit. So, Joe, the question becomes, how do you lower the ratio to a number that's not going to elicit as much suspicion?

Always only eighty seven percent for Biden. But get rid of certain Trump votes. Oh, I got a crazy idea, Armacost. How about you just take some votes away for Trump and give him to a third party? Oh. Kenny Bell time, did we think about the beginning of the show? Yeah. I miss that. How did I miss that? I'm so I was looking at the Kenny below its Kenny time. Thank you, Richard.

We've had another moment. I don't like to ring the bell too much, but the Kenny Bell, that's a great idea. Now, if you did that, though, because you don't want to give too many votes to Biden, because the ratio will go up by 99 to one. But you don't want to give him the Trump either. What do you do, you give them the third party candidates, but then, Joe, what would happen?

You'd see an abnormal pattern of third party candidates getting more votes in cities where there was alleged fraud. Then you would see those third party candidates getting in similar cities around the country. Wouldn't you see that? Genius, it's called math statistics. What if I told you that could happen? You'd be curious, media morons won't be, of course, because they're morons by nature. So let's go to this next screenshot from this piece in Substory where that exists, exactly what happens.

He talks about this update, this one in Michigan. He says it's also particularly interesting for another reason. Oh, wow. There are two thousand five hundred and forty six non two party votes, meaning third party candidates that weren't Trump or Biden. Why Donald Trump has only five thousand nine hundred and sixty eight votes in this dump. Then he shows you a histogram of the other ratios around the country. Oh, I got more on this. So that seems awfully odd, these third party non Trump Biden candidates got an unusually high number of votes in this same batch where Donald Trump lost overwhelmingly.

He lost by one hundred and thirty five thousand votes. Third party candidates get votes all the time. But they generally get the same amount of votes and similar ideologically oriented cities around the country. So let's look exactly about what happened with this particular data dump and how these third party candidates, Joe, did unbelievably well. Crazy time here. Check this out from the piece. This is crazy, by the way, citing this many screenshots. But if it wasn't worth your time, I wouldn't waste it.

He says, in particular, calls into serious question the veracity of this vote update and perhaps some of the strongest direct evidence of fraud in this entire report here. Pay close attention to this. Someone looking to fraudulently improve Biden's margins relative to Trump is likely to be focused on covering their tracks by keeping Joe Biden's share of the update at some reasonable value. Ninety five percent of Biden might seem plausible, but ninety nine point nine percent at this scale, which is no with this number of votes, becomes prima facia implausibility to any honest observer.

Goes on. One more. One more. One effective way of achieving this desired goal of decreasing Trump votes at this point would be to suppress the Trump vote while artificially inflating the non two party vote, i.e. third parties, in an attempt to disguise just how Biden favoring this update actually was.

Oh, oh. Well, that would show up in the ratios, right? You know, liberals and media imbeciles watching, you know, imbeciles, imbeciles are they don't they don't really understand basic math and algorithms, but ratio's statistics, numbers, anomalies. You could point them out by showing how the ratio of third party votes in this city would be unusually high compared to third party votes elsewhere. By the way, ladies and gentlemen, the piece is brilliant.

Again, it's the substract piece in the show notes today. Mancino that Constellation newsletter. Please read it. But he makes another fascinating point in the piece I'd like you to consider. You know, when you're doing a Bernie Madoff type fraud and you're just making up numbers, you're just making them up. It's not necessarily zero sum. If I want to tell Joe Armacost that I'm a Bernie Madoff type. Hey, Joe, your thousand dollar investment made ten grand last week.

And I'm just making up the numbers. I just make them up. I make up a fake bank statement, brokerage account for Joe. Ten thousand dollars. Hey, Joe, look, Joe's like, yeah, ten thousand dollars. What's the problem? It's just made up. He just doesn't come from anyone else because it's not zero sum. He made it up. It wasn't taken from us. There's no money until Joe tries to cash out and figures out there's no money.

That's not the case with voting. You understand why, because you may say something. Why give them why even inflate the third party vote account? Joe, are you asking this question? I mean, why not just take away the votes in general? Yeah. Aaron, of course, Joe's asking that question, be smart because you can't. Because at these large numbers, ladies and gentlemen, you have firewalls, you butt up against people who are registered to vote the population of the entire state of Michigan.

In other words, Joe, this is zero sum. What you give to Biden or take away from Trump, you have to hide somewhere else because you're limited by certain factors, like the number of people who are actually alive in Michigan. You track him. What I'm saying, Joe, I've stated very simply saying you can't add sixty two million votes in Michigan to Joe Biden. Sixty two million people don't even live in Michigan. You have to hide it somewhere.

And when you hide it somewhere, this piece makes this point brilliantly, he talks about middle of P or C, I don't know who wrote it talks in the middle of the piece about symmetry, but he's talking about a zero sum analysis. What you take from one, you have to hide elsewhere because you're limited. You're not. That doesn't happen in a standard accounting fraud. We just make numbers up. Doesn't matter. You dig? He hammers this point further on this third party analysis here and this next screenshot.

Talking about this piece, he says in particular, because the non two party candidates received far less media attention than the 2016 presidential cycle and the Green Party candidate was even successfully sued off the ballot in one or more states. It's hard to believe that this vote update only favored Trump over the non two party vote by less than a factor of two point five when the statewide ratio was over thirty one. I'll explain. Don't you worry. It goes on.

Absent a compelling explanation of why this particular update at such a crucial time in a crucial state which improve Biden standing in the state so dramatically, also had non two party votes performing so unusual relative to Trump votes, it seems unlikely that this vote update reflects an honest accounting of the legitimate votes.

I do a double cannibal, but I don't want to ring your ears out. Let me show. Do I need to translate that? Let me try. Yeah, please do. We can use it. Yeah. Let me just put that in a little like Reader's Digest bullet for you, the author of the piece is saying, wow, these third party candidates on the presidential ballot, in other words, did not trump Biden people. They did incredibly well relative to 2016, despite the fact that they got almost no media attention.

Remember 2016, Jill Stein, remember she was born, Dr. Jill Stein, remember, she was all over the media. Remember that all over. She was the third party candidate, 2016 quick outside of Jorgensen, who most people don't know anyway. But we know because who was the third party candidate about Joe? Come on, quick, quick, quick. Paula, tell me. Tell me. OK, two out of three that. What do you know?

I'm not going to waste your time. It's not your fault. Nobody else knows either. I'll be honest with you. I don't know. I know. Georgiade said that's it. So you're telling me in the twenty twenty election cycle, despite no media attention whatsoever of any significance for third party candidates. That they did better than Jill Stein, who was all over the media in twenty sixteen, is a third party. Yeah, yeah, that makes a whole boatload of sense if you're an idiot.

So that's point one where he's talking, but you can read it again in the article and follow along at home, I encourage you to do so. He talks about the media attention, that's point one, he makes another point, the piece. That around the entire state of Michigan. President Trump outperformed the third party candidate by a ratio of thirty one votes for every vote for a third party candidate you're tracking, but you're suggesting to me with this fraudulent or excuse me, I'm going to be sure these are allegations, but this allegation of a fraudulent vote, Dompierre or the hint at it in this piece, they say, is what he's doing, hinting at it that President Trump only outperformed the third party candidate by two point five to one.

While I still have it. My hair. I don't even care about losing the hair on my head, I care about losing the facial hair, I'm just going to be very disturbing. I got another appointment tomorrow. Folks, does that make any sense to you? No, he outperformed the third party candidate throughout the entire state, 31 to one, but in this suspicious vote, no, he only outperformed them two point five to one I.

I got one more here, let me get to my third sponsor, but I got one more. It's an interesting summary chart in this piece and there's a graph. Do you know I know liberals have a tough time with that, but you may want to look at the graph in summary chart that sums up this whole piece. And you'll start to wonder, so the ratios are out of whack. The vote counts are out of whack, the third party vote counts are out of whack in the third party, ratios are out of whack.

And this all happened suspiciously in the morning following election night while no one was paying attention. Gosh, that's awfully weird. Now you know why the media wants to shut us up, no, thanks. All right. Today's show also brought to you by our friends at Pearl Sauce Jewelleries. One of the most popular gifts you can get for the holidays is good reason for it. You can really go wrong, especially if you're going with the classics. Bought this for my wife, I might add.

She looks great. I know you do. I know you love it, too.

There's nothing more classic and timeless and find pearl jewelry which doesn't need to break your budget at the pearl sauce. You get the highest quality pearl jewelry. So you see the picture right there on the screen. Look at that. Add up to 70 percent off retail prices. Why? Because the pearl sauce cuts out the middleman. They eliminate the traditional five times markups by jewelry stores. They sell directly to you the consumer. What an idea. Shop safely and securely for the comfort of your own home.

At the pearl sauce, you'll find the largest selection of beautiful pearls available anywhere. And each piece is custom made for you. Customize your jewelry based on pearl size, quality, gold type length and many more choices. The pearl sauce offers fast and free two day shipping on the fast and free day. Shipping on every order comes with no hassle 60 day money back guarantee so it's risk free. Plus, for more than twenty years in the Pearl business and over seven thousand five star reviews, you can be sure you're shopping from a trusted retailer.

Do not overpay for jewelry. Go to the pearl sauce today. Save up to 70 percent of retail prices and for a limited time listeners. For my show you can take 20 percent off your entire order for the holiday. I'm going today.

Go to the pearl sauce dotcom slash Dan in a promo code. Dan, check out for twenty percent off your entire order if you want. Find pearl jewelry at the best. Prices online go straight to the source. The pearl sauce, the pearl sauce, dot com Dan and the promo code. Dan, at checkout, you're going to love a beautiful big hit in my house. All right. So folks just tell you where we been, tell you what you're going to tell you, tell you and and tell you what I told you.

You can have high ratios, you can have high vote count differences. It's very unusual to have both. It's very unusual to have them in the early morning when some voters vote, observers were kicked out. And even more unusual when you when you factor in third party candidates who did unusually well, despite no media attention whatsoever. They must be great campaigners, too. So here's a summary of this piece. Ladies and gentlemen, we've done kind of a college one on one statistic.

Of course, I might get to some other video for Trump and another article for The Spectator about all these anomalies that no one seems concerned about the media. But here's a summary of the whole piece here summed up in one thing. Here's a chart of all the suspicious voter dumps. You have them laid out if you want to watch, and I encourage you to do so. Rumball Dotcom Slash Mancino You'll see the Times highlighted six thirty one for forty two a.m. this in the morning.

One thirty four a.m.. Three fifty a.m.. You see the score. Where he does he goes to an analysis, you'll see the Biden votes and the Trump votes. He says a below this chart there so we can see four of the seven most anomalous vote updates for liberals. That means unusual which is which is to say updates which the margin and ratio are extreme are in election critical states. Man, that's weird. And occurred during the same five hour period where the circumstances on the ground were and remain contested and highly suspicious.

Crazy, crazy pills everywhere. High ratios, extreme vote counts, third party candidates doing exceptionally well, all in the same five hour window, all in swing states, Biden needed to win all in states. Trump was up dramatically by hundreds of thousands. In one case, seven hundred thousand votes in Pennsylvania. They all seem to happen, man. You know, in some limited circles, Joe, we got to go back to the old standby, we call that a clue when I was a federal investigator, but not the media.

They don't seem to care. Because Trump said it. Keep in mind, if the situation was reversed. And Joe Biden was on television having lost the election, talking about the same anomalies, Joe, you'd be sure not only with the anomalies be front page stories, but they'd be blaming the Russians for Putin did it. Putin was campaigning somewhere in the Putin 20. That's what they'd be doing, collusion, there's no doubt about it. But because these anomalies, if if the allegations turn out to be evidence of fraud, the media doesn't care because the fraud benefits their guy.

I should have just called this the election fraud special. I got another video, President Trump, remember, whenever the media loses their mind, the golden rule about something Trump says, these data dumps, whatever they may be, it means you're over the target and should double down and just ignore these idiots. Here's the second part of that interview where President Trump openly questions this Biden magic. We're talking about where he dramatically outperformed Trump not only in ratios, but in gross numbers to the Biden magic, which we saw at his rallies where six people attended and four staffers.

So he mentions three things here, No. One in this clip, he talks about the Biden magic air quotes. He talks about two stuffing the ballot box and three dimensions, mentions the statistics don't add up. Again, everybody likes to tell you in the media because they're morons, that Trump's a moron. But he's bringing this up for a reason. All the reasons I just said play this cut.

They use covid as a means to stuff the ballot box, as Joe Biden did not get 16 million more votes than Barack Hussein Obama. He didn't get it. Joe Biden did not get 14 million more votes than Hillary Clinton. And by the way, he didn't beat Obama in the black communities. You go to some of these communities where Obama is very, very popular and he beats him in some of these communities, but all throughout the rest of the United States, in a black community, he does he does actually poorly.

He doesn't do very well, but he beats Obama in swing states. Now, think of that. He beat Obama in swing states. You know, that didn't happen. They stuffed the ballot box. Everybody knows that. This is this is some of the impossible statistics that we have found, and this is from the Federalist article. They call it Biden Magic and they list a number of of ways that Joe Biden magically outperformed election norm.

Keep in mind, nothing. Maria Bartiromo, who's fantastic, said there, Trump. Is untrue, nothing. The statistics don't add up. The Biden magic is a joke, by the way, we cover that Federalist article on Friday's show, which did bonkers numbers thanks to you. Nothing Trump said there is untrue. That's why it drives the media crazy. The statistics don't add up, having let me Cavitt they stuffed the ballot box, I can't confirm that I do fax here, but what Trump said about the statistics and the Biden magic is absolutely true.

Rather than going back and relitigating the federalist piece, which is in Friday's show, let's do a new piece I found at The Spectator, which is really just as good as the Federalist piece and again, will be in the show notes. I think it's on top that in the subsect they're one and two. Don't miss the show notes again, please. That I. It's by Patrick Basham, spectator reasons why the 20 20 presidential election is deeply puzzling.

So it's on the news right now.

Is so crazy. Let's get into this piece, I want to dig through some screen caps on this one, too, because this is just the straight up the U.S. as well. Let's go to number one. First, let's consider some facts. Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent president seeking re-election. He got 11 million more votes in twenty sixteen, the third largest rise in support ever for an incumbent. Incumbent by way of comparison, Obama was comfortably re-elected in twenty twenty twelve with three point five million fewer votes than he received, fewer votes, fewer votes that he received in 2008.

So Obama is comfortably re-elected. Absolutely, roots Mittens gets three point five million fewer votes, Trump gets 11 million more and is routed by Joe Magic Biden. Who had tens of people at his rallies? Folks, it gets worse. I've got a few more of these from The Spectator, please let me get to my last sponsor of the day. They appreciate I appreciate them being here. It's important, but I got more here. That is. None of this makes any sense at all.

Now you're wondering why overwhelming majorities of people who identify as conservatives and Trump supporters don't think this election is passing the smell test. My final sponsor today are our friends and we, the people, they determined this is my we the people hoster it literally says we, the people on it. I like the printed designs and I love the Constitution. So it was a perfect match for me. Hey, the pending results of the election will no doubt caused a spike in firearm sales.

If you're making a purchase because you're worried about the future of the Second Amendment, I want you to be safe, responsible and carry with the best holsters out there. We the people who are starting to just forty dollars is mine. We the people holsters are custom designed to fit your firearm perfectly. You get that click in there nice and secure. They're made right here in the USA. We have thousands of options to choose from, plus an amazing selection of printed holsters.

Their proprietary clip design you can see right here on the back allows for you to easily adjust the camp in the right of the holster so it fits comfortably and securely at all times. How do you get one? That's the big question. Makes a great stocking stuffer to go to. We the people holsters that and get yours today. Every holster ships free comes with a lifetime guarantee. Get an additional ten dollars off with offer Codan. It makes a great gift.

Satisfaction guaranteed. If it's not perfect, the fit isn't perfect. Send it right back for a total refund. It will be we the people holsters that then we the people holsters that stand offer. Go and check out this call. We the people print that holster to. It's really cool is one of mine. Check it out today. So getting back to this piece. So not only did President Trump just. Absolutely annihilate his former fatales. And yet somehow managed to lose.

Here's another one he did particularly well with minority voters to a point I can't state enough from the spectator piece. He earned the highest share of all minority votes for Republicans since 1960. Trump grew his support among black amongst black voters by 50 percent over 20 16 nationally, Joe Magic by Nemoto in that in his black support fell well below 90 percent. By the way, the level below which Democratic presidential candidates usually lose, no doubt this cycle, Joe Magic was back home.

Joe Magic by. Magic Biden, record numbers of triple doubles. Guys, just magic with a basketball vote tallies. Joe Biden, he's just incredible, the guy such an over performer. I mean, he just crushed it on the campaign trail. Remember in the primaries where he just destroyed everyone right out of the chute? Yeah, yeah. I remember when he got crushed, he finished like seventy second in Iowa and New Hampshire. A little hyperbole, but not far from the truth.

Remember, he did so bad in New Hampshire. He left before the night was even over. Oh, you don't remember that he abandoned his rally there because he performed so badly. The magic came later though, Joe. It just came later. South Carolina is when the magic kicked it. Check out the Hispanic vote, clearly, Trump must have underperformed with Hispanic vote because Biden won right folks out telling us so. He had to get the votes from somewhere so he didn't get it from Republicans.

He didn't perform particularly well with Democrats. He didn't perform well with the black vote. So definitely the Hispanic vote. Well, let's read the numbers here, too, from the Spectator piece. That can't be right. So it says here Trump increased his share of the national Hispanic vote. That's got to be wrong. It says he increased the share of the Hispanic vote to thirty five percent with 60 percent or less of the national Hispanic vote. It is mathematically impossible for a Democratic presidential candidate to win Florida, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico.

Bellwether state swung further in Trump's direction than in twenty sixteen Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied American media polls with huge wins for Trump. Gosh, this is like all adding up since 1850 to only Richard Nixon has lost the election. Electoral College after winning this trio of states and that 1960 defeat to JFK is still the subject of great suspicion. If you don't believe me, go to a search engine put in 1960. Nixon, Kennedy, Chicago, Illinois.

You'll see what I mean. Still wondering media types. By. Overwhelming majorities of Trump supporters are like, nah, not so much, 20, 20. We're not really feeling it. But just keep disregarding us, we'll just keep talking about the truth. By the way, some guy responded back to my one of my social media postings was like an enough talk. Fix it. I'm trying. What do you want me to do? All I can do is put the information out there.

You know, you're the leaders. You've been waiting for you in my arms. I again, I'm not use this one guy's indicative of my whole audience. But I put this out there. I believe me, I'm making every call I can. Trust me. I need you to do it, too. I'm just one guy. I'm not a monarch, I'm calling everyone shaking every tree I can, I need you to do it, too. That's why I talk about this stuff.

Let's go on to another anomaly. You mean like this can't get any worse all we can and it does the county level anomalies, we're told Biden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history.

Wow, that's crazy. But he won a record low of 17 percent of counties. This is strange. So he wins the most votes of anyone ever and yet percentage wise wins the record low amount of counties in 17 percent. He only won five hundred twenty four counties as opposed to eight hundred and seventy three counties for Obama in 2008. Yet Biden somehow outed Obama in total votes. Whoa. It goes on. Victorious presidential candidates, especially challengers, usually have down ballot coattails where other Democrats would win, I mean, Biden got a record number of votes.

Biden really did that, right? No, Biden did not. The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a red wave in the House where they gained a large number of seats, winning all twenty seven tossups. Trump's party did not lose a single state legislature and actually made gains at the state level. Got to watch Rumblefish check that one out. What's holding 15 years? Fifty, I'm holding 15 yards repeat first down. So Joe Magic Biden. Wins the most votes of any candidate ever destroys air quotes President Trump in the popular vote, despite Trump getting 11 million more votes than last time.

And yet. Has a record low number of victories in the county and gets wiped out, down ballot everywhere, even in California where the Republicans are going to net probably three plus House seats, California, California. You know, that bastion of right wing conservatism? Crossing these off, so I don't forget. Here's another one that's just straight up weird, these rejection rates I've been talking about forever, so, you know, statistics, math, in pretty much every election you get a consistent number of rejections of mail in ballots.

Why people screw up, forget the date, forget the sign, forget the security, leave the rate of rejections about one or two percent, twice as much as in-person voting where you can correct it. Right. There you go. To submit the ballot in person, especially in voter ID states. One, they know it's you. Secondly, if you forget the data, they're like, hey, you forgot the date it. Right. Makes sense, do that in the mail, the mailman is not going to do that for you.

Anybody you forgot to tell you about? He doesn't know that it's not his job to know that. So rejection rates are pretty consistently higher for mail in ballots, but not this election where we had a bunch of first time mail in ballot voters who magically figured it out, just like Biden on the first time from the Spectator piece. Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail and voting. Such as Biden's narrow margin, that is, political analyst Robert Barnes observes, quote, If the states simply impose the same absentee ballot rejection rates as recent cycles, then Trump wins the election.

Just weird, man. If ballots were rejected at the same rate they were forever like in human history, then Trump would have won. But no, if you reject them at lower rates, meaning you accept other questionable ballots, magically Biden pulls it out. Joe Magic Biden back again.

The triple double the magic Joe. With his magic dump's. They're massive to. I'll leave that Paula would kill me, so I'm going to leave that. Maybe when my brain gets a little scrambled tomorrow, I'm going to leave that for another day. Let's get to the last one from the Spectator piece. I really I know you should never let my eyes start getting red. This is the cue that I'm laughing at my own jokes. You shouldn't do that.

It's terrible broadcasting policy. But I think I'm funny. I don't know why, because I'm not I'm not funny, but I think I'm which is very bizarre. Cognitive dissonance. Let's get to the last piece from The Spectator. Here we go with these ratios again. Now, this is in The Spectator piece, but again, it kind of doubles down on what we saw on the substract piece from the voter integrity guy. Quote, Statistical anomalies are weird.

In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with eighty nine percent of the votes counted, so in other words, when eighty nine percent of the votes were in, that's when Biden took his lead, because there are liberals listening.

So we got to be slow here. This is just strange, Joe. After Biden took the lead for the next fifty three batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact fifty point zero five to forty nine point nine five percent margin in every single batch. Oh, my gosh. The chances it is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were all in Biden's favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened.

So in Georgia, where we saw historically low rejection rates for ballots seemingly accepted, all of them, whatever you want, looks good there. That's the signature match up, who knows? And like we did signature machine. Well, how'd you get a historically low rejection rate? And you listen to Dunce's like Frank Luntz and they did a PSA. Yes, Smokey the Bandit. That always works. It's not like we've seen any forest fires since then.

Don't you find it weird? This will sum up the whole show, this Georgia ratio, part of The Spectator. That after Biden takes the lead, when eighty nine percent of the Georgia vote is counted. After he takes the lead. All of a sudden. The ratios are almost flat. Joe, why would they do that, Paula? Why would they do that? Let me just let me caveat this, because it is important, because unlike the mainstream media, we do fact.

If you were going to fraudulently try to alter the results. Of a red state that's barely a swing state like Georgia. If you were going to do it, let me pose this is the quote, because it's not fair, because Joe is busy doing producing stuff. So, Paul. Everybody knows George is a red state, right? So if you wanted Biden to win Georgia, Joe, would you do it and give Biden 90 percent of the vote and Trump can or would you give Biden fifty point five percent of the vote and Trump forty eight point five or something like this one?

Which one would you choose? Door number two here? That he would choose the latter as Paula. Paul is agreeing with just two out of three ain't bad meatloaf's. So we agree that you would choose a slight margin. So that's awfully weird, right, that right after Biden takes the lead in Georgia, the vote ratios are exactly the same for all the remaining batches. Just just just bizarre. To. It's actually three out of three, I just stay silent.

And I was going to get into some other stuff, too, you know, can we just do this quickly? The Wall Street Journal covered this a little more tomorrow. This is just hilarious, I want to leave on a good note, but that kind of sums up the whole show, how the ratios were just all these statistical abnormalities. They all magically favor Joe Magic, but I'll address this more tomorrow. It because there's a bigger story here about facture.

You know, the fact checks I've been telling you about forever that happen on Facebook and Twitter and they only seem to happen to conservatives. And the fact checks are, in fact so absurd that I not say this, Paul. Remember this show where the fact checks that they're doing on Facebook and Twitter to get your voice silenced on Facebook and Twitter, if you're a conservative, have had the absolute opposite effect. How now conservatives read a liberal fact check on Twitter on a conservative post and believe now that the facts displayed are even more accurate in contrast to the fact check.

And that's why Facebook's concern. You remember, Joe, you remember this show?

Yeah, I do. As a matter of fact. I know you do, because I was complaining to you the whole day about it afterwards. Mm hmm. Now we have data to back it up, that that's actually what's happening. This is hilarious, this story in The Wall Street Journal today. I'll cover it more. It involves Kansas Owens and how she fought back and won. But I will do a little tease. The Wall Street Journal editorial board, the social media fact check farce.

They go right to the screenshot because the screenshot is just beautiful. So Twitter and Facebook fact check, conservative pages, a fake fact checks, and they do it to suppress your reach. They use it to silence and throttle your page. It's become so ineffective at fact checking that has had the opposite effect. Check this out. This is so this is great. So they did this study at Boston University and Cornell where volunteers were shown a May twenty six tweet by Trump attacking mail and voting.

And it had one of these fact checks. The tweet said mailboxes will be raw, ballots will be forged, even illegally printed out, fraudulently sign. These groups of participants were shown the corrections air quotes to Mr. Trump's tweet, including Twitter's explanatory text. In other words, they're fact check. Look what happened. Conservatives did not find mainstream media assurances convincing. Oh, that's a shocker for Republicans who were shown Twitter's effort to debunk the president, its belief that mail and fraud was 13 percent higher than in the belief that the mail fraud occurs was more than 30 percent higher than Nicotrol.

I've read that totally, totally wrong. Or in other words, in other words, the authors put it. The corrections by Twitter increased misperceptions amongst those predisposed to believe President Trump. In other words, we think Facebook and Twitter are so fake that when Twitter and Facebook do a fact check on the president, their supporters are 13 percent more likely to believe the president's tweet. Harahan, nice job.

Twitter and Facebook. Well done. Well done. You're so good at this. And by so good, I mean so terrible. A bunch of idiots. I told you this was going to happen now. We have the data to back it up, fake book fact checks it, people are more likely to believe it because fake book is so fake and so's Twitter. I just want a bunch of idiots who had one job opportunity. I'll get it to the fact check tomorrow so we can decide on how she fought back and won, because these fact checks are fake.

They're fake. All right, folks, thanks again for tuning in, I really appreciate again. You're not going to want to miss the show this week. Please subscribe. We really if we were number one all weekend and news on Apple's charts, thanks to you. That's from subscriptions, not from listeners. It's weird. I know. Subscribe to this show. It's free on Apple podcast. And please, please on Rumbo. We are almost almost at 700000 subscribers on Rumball and we're about to surpass YouTube.

It is all free. Rumball are you Embley Dotcom Bongino. Please watch the show there. Paula puts a lot of great work into it. So does Drew show on the audio side. Please subscribe Rumball and Apple. We have an outstanding outstanding exclusive this week with General Mike Flynn coming up in the show. You're not going to want to miss that. Thanks for tuning in. See you tomorrow.

You just heard Dan Bongino.