Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino. Let me be crystal clear in case there's any confusion out there at all, which there shouldn't be from people who may have misinterpreted the fight left in me. Parla is not going anywhere, anywhere. I've said repeatedly on radio programs and television on my own show, and I'll tell you now, I will go bankrupt and destitute. Dead in a box before we.

Before we go down without a fight. You have absolutely zero chance of taking the biggest free speech platform we've ever developed to fight back against the totalitarians offline. I've got that for you today, I've got, of course, the impeachment going on right now do not fall into the groupthink trap. They are leveraging weakness right now. And sadly, there are many on Capitol Hill who are falling right into it. I've also got inside scoop on a story I've unfortunately been a part of that is fake.

And the real reason this fake story is out there. I've got a loaded show Today show, but Express VPN, ladies and gentlemen, get a VPN today, go to express VPN, Dotcom Bongino and protect your online activity from prying eyeballs. Express VPN dot com slash Mangena. Welcome to the Dan Bongino show. Ladies and gentlemen, in the interest of time, I'm going to get right to it. I just want to say thank you for all your questions about my health.

We got ninety nine point nine nine percent good news yesterday. A little bit of bad news, but we're going to be OK. Appreciate all your concern. Can I just say to you, I just am tired of getting poked and prodded. No more needles. Please look at me. I can't even take it. I look like I got tracks in my arms. I can't take it anymore. I really can't. That's just wearing me down and dealing with this pahlavi's.

I been tough to sleep last night. The first night's sleep I got in a long time. Good night's sleep. All right, let's get right to it. Today show about you by we.

The people will live in an uncertain times and millions have come to realize the importance of the Second Amendment. If you're looking for the perfect accessory to go with your firearm, get an American made holster from our friends that we the people holsters. I have two of these starting at just forty dollars. We the people holsters are custom molded to fit your exact firearm. They're not those generic one size fits all in the waistband holsters where everything falls out. You don't need that.

They have thousands of options, including an amazing selection and printed holsters. Their proprietary clip design allows you to adjust the canthe in the ride for comfort and security. That's important. The best pollsters out there that I've seen go to we the people holstege dotcom down, and while you're there, check out their premium print, that hoodie's long sleeved t shirts and their new Edik Tactical Gundel, which comes paired with a patented Cobra buchel. Every Holstering Gundel comes with a lifetime guarantee.

If it's not the perfect fit, send it back for a full refund. We the people hostas dot com slash Dan get an additional ten dollars off. It is like that with the offer Codan we the people hostas dot com slash Dan we the people hostas dotcom and producer.

Joe let's get back to normal. Let's go. All right. Thank you my friend. First, let's get to the most pressing issue because we have to triage our priorities right now. Number one, folks do not fall into the groupthink trap regarding the impeachment going on right now and election integrity. And to add that so-called the inciting of violence, which is ironic if you've listened to my show, we've only spoken out against this for four years. Why the liberal media was condoning it.

Weird. Weird how all of a sudden where the targets, not the liberal media who are like, there's room to burn, there's room to destroy. Those are politicians in the media. Wait till I show you some of the headlines later. I know it's not. What about ISM? And if it is, what about Azem? Good, because it's what about principles that matter? No. One, getting back to my headline, I do not fall into this groupthink trap.

This is no time for weakness. I'm not lecturing my audience, I get your emails. You're the strongest ones out there. I'm talking to the bureaucrats. I'm talking to the the people up on the Hill right now. This is not the time for weakness. I will not be bullied, coerced, coerced at all. I don't listen to what people tell them when you tell me not to do something, I do more of it as long as it comports with my moral principles.

There's nothing you can do to me, nothing you will ever do to me, nothing you will. Let me take that back to a lot of things you can do to me. Nothing you will do to me that will stop me from doing what I'm doing. Nothing. What do I mean by don't fall into the groupthink trap, I'm seeing it now on a couple of things. Don't dare bring up free and fair elections or election integrity. I'll talk about whatever I want.

We are a constitutional republic. The way we enact change in a representative democracy, in a constitutional republic is we vote for representatives in a constitutional republic who are supposed to represent our interests. If we cannot trust that vote and we don't believe that vote is representative of our interests, then we have nothing. I will not under any circumstances stop demanding election integrity and free and fair elections any. Do not fall into the groupthink trap. This is why I've seen this a thousand times, where Democrats leverage a moment, a moment of bipartisan condemnation, especially the events of Wednesday, and they leverage the moment to use it to attack other things not related to what happened there.

It will be no silencing at all. This would be an issue you would think would concern people in the media who used to talk about this issue before they thought it would damage Donald Trump to not talk about it. Free and fair elections matter that the bedrock of a peaceful constitutional republic don't fall into the groupthink trap. Second, I see more group think the president cited violence. Ladies and gentlemen, you could dispute all day the content of President Trump's speech on Wednesday.

And if he were to change it or not, I can guarantee you he would have gone back and changed some of the wording. President, United States did not incite violence. If you read the speech, which I know is hard for some in the liberal media and others who aren't interested in the facts, the president said march on the capital peacefully and patriotically, something that's been said by probably 20 or 30000 prominent speakers in the last hundred years. So why are the rules different now?

The rules are different now. Because it's Donald Trump. Do not fall into this trap. I'm not going to take it. I'm not going to allow myself to do this silly, sad virtue signalling. I see a lot of Republicans. Well, you know, the president cited violence, but no, no, I don't accept your premise. Let me get to point three. Which is important, too, and you may not like it, and that's fine if you don't like it, that's OK.

But I will disagree with you and it's my show and I'm going to take this stand and I have. Don't fall into the groupthink trap on Wednesday either, what happened there? I worked with Capitol Hill police officers, I went to a surveillance course with some of them, they were great guys. Hit them with a fire extinguisher. There's the groupthink trap here and. Well, you know what, maybe we should, you know, it was just a it was a few people and those few people have absolutely no place in this movement.

None. Zero. I won't be condemned to fall into the groupthink trap. I don't care who's talking about it. Police officer dragged to the ground. Beating them up. Now, we need absolute moral clarity on this absolute. But we have nothing. It's not a sermon, I'm not your preacher, but it's my show, and you deserve to know where I stand on these three things I will not be baited into. Third grade peer pressure, bully tactics to say, don't you dare talk about you like I will talk about what I want.

We need free and fair elections. The integrity of our elections is everything, not something. You will not bait me into saying the president condemned incited violence, how marching peacefully and patriotically is inciting violence is beyond me. I'd love to see you wiggle your way around that. But third, we all need absolute moral clarity on Wednesday. What happened Wednesday, absolute. We need unity on that. Let me move to this impeachment today. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a collaborative effort by some rhinos with no spines.

They're not even rhinos, they're Democrats who are pretending to be Republican, that Republicans anymore, they're not Republicans at all who are falling into the groupthink trap. The president is leaving office in just a few days. This impeachment is a ceremonial, collaborative effort to destroy what they feel is a growing movement by President Trump. That's not going to stop of people who are sick of establishment nonsense. And I ask you what Newt Gingrich asked on Fox the other day, if you really believe President Trump's political influence.

On the American psyche is nil, and he's destroyed because you think he incited violence on Wednesday, which is pretty much universally condemned, then why impeach him? What's the point? Especially with just days to go. The answer is you're doing it because you're afraid that President Trump's political movement. The political movement, I should say, the Republican movement that aligned with President Trump, to be more precise in my language, is not done in over. Ladies and gentlemen, don't forget I brought this up the first time and I'll bring it up now, impeachment is not a criminal trial.

It is a political exercise. There is no jail time imposed by an impeachment or a subsequent conviction in the Senate trial. It is a political damnation. It is not a legal one in the traditional sense of the word. So if impeachment is a political side political exercise, which relies on politics, you would think the politics, which is the power of garnering people to your cause, in the very essence, that's what politics is, then you would think you would have the people on your side to move forward with an impeachment despite the fact that President Trump is leaving office in just days.

You want to know why they're really doing it? Here's why they're trying to change the. Look at Rasmussen's latest poll, President Trump's approval rating. I pulled this. 49 percent. Ladies and gentlemen. Daily presidential tracking poll Tuesday, January 12 20, 2021, presidential approval, 49 percent. I just told you, we need moral clarity that in no way confers or sanctions, what happened on Wednesday is anything other than an abomination. But he clearly says that other people have clarity on this.

And don't believe President Trump incited violence like I don't. Second, if this is a political exercise, I'm telling you that it's an effort to turn the political tide. Then why isn't it working? Here's an article by Paul Bedard in The Washington Examiner. I'll put in the show notes today. Please subscribe to our newsletter. Ladies and gentlemen, the show notes it's the same thing, but China.com newsletter, I don't know how long in the future will be allowed to communicate.

We're living in like again speakeasies to talk to each other. Washington Examiner, 60 percent of people. Sixty percent of people call impeachment a, quote, waste of time. Big tech backlash for censoring Trump. Washington Examiner, if this is a political exercise, ladies and gentlemen, it's veiling. So what's really happening here? What's really happening is group think spineless people up on Capitol Hill who have no interest in unity whatsoever, because as I said to you and I said on Fox the other day, and I'll say now and I said on my show, there are no principles at stake.

No one I know in any way even remotely has sanctioned what happened on Wednesday. If you do, I don't want to know you anymore. Nobody has done that. So what principle are we arguing? You know what, I'm going to get this to say, but it's like two kids in a sandbox not arguing over a toy while one's arguing over a toy. Two kids in a sandbox. Hey, that's my toy I want to play, but if the other kid.

Yeah, that's your toy, you play with it. No, no, I said it's my toy. Yet your toy. No, no. I said it's my toy. No, no, I just said it's your toy. Play with it. No, no, it's mine. How many? We're not arguing here. There's no argument over Wednesday. Not on this show. Or anywhere else, I can tell. So what's the argument? The arguments are a political one.

We have to stop Donald Trump. What are they scared of? They're scared of the 2022 primary season. Now, Trump can't run for president, 2022 wouldn't even be available to 2024. That's not what they're worried about. They're worried about Donald Trump and the Trump family endorsing candidates in the 2022 primary season. That's what they're worried about. And they're worried about a total rout when I say they I'm talking about the Republicans, let me be clear, precision matters.

They're worried about a total rout that will make the Tea Party look like an episode of Sesame Street. And that pretty much every establishment Republican lawmaker will be rooted out. In exchange for people who support a strong conservative movement, they are terrified. That's why they need Trump politically defenestrate. I'm getting this from everywhere, ladies and gentlemen, not just making this up. Sorry I didn't shave. It's been a long couple of days of travel and to all the people I saw in Texas, that's where I was yesterday, even with my mask on.

Thank you for your kind words. You're unbelievable. To the hotel manager was very nice to me and my wife, I going to say, what hotel liberals will burn it down. I'm with you. Let me get to my one and only video on the show today, because it's important because they've got another bunch of content. I've got some headlines that are going to scare you up next. I've also got the inside scoop on Parlo, which you need to hear.

Obviously, me being an investor in parler stuff. I can tell you some I can't, but I'll give you what's really going on because it's scarier than you could possibly imagine. Let me get this video first on this impeachment fiasco today. This is Alan Dershowitz on CBN with David Brody. Alan Dershowitz brings up three things about this sham impeachment. Number two, number one, impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. There's not only not a high crime, there's no crime or misdemeanor.

Second, he talks about Brandenburg versus Ohio. I'll get to that in a second. It's important to understand that. I want to bring up one more point to have this video. President Trump will be out of office in just a few days. He will be a private citizen. The Constitution does not allow the Senate to try a private citizen. They try the president of the United States. This is entirely unconstitutional and an absurdity. Here's Dershowitz explaining the first two points about high crimes and misdemeanors and Brandenberg.

I'll explain what he means in a second. Check this out.

It's unconstitutional to violate several provisions of the Constitution. Number one, it's not a high crime and misdemeanor. Number two, it's protected by the Constitution and by the debate and speech clause and by our general traditions of free and open dialogue in the marketplace of ideas. The articles of impeachment basically suggest you can impeach president for a speech that virtually everybody, every constitutional scholar acknowledges is protected by the Constitution.

The Brandenburg cases the leading Supreme Court decision, and it says the president or anybody else may advocate violence. You can incite it, you can advocate it.

And what he did was advocating simply going to the Capitol, you know, how many people have stood where he stood and advocated marching on the capital of union leaders, civil rights leaders, to turn it from good to bad members of the Ku Klux Klan, members of the Nazi party, communists, suffragettes.

That's a standard tactic. You get up and you say, go to the Capitol protest, show how strong we are, show that we're not willing to back down. It's right in the Constitution. That's right. To petition government for a redress of grievances. That's what he urged people to do. They got out of hand. They committed crimes. They should be prosecuted, but the speaker should not be prosecuted.

Sorry, that was David Brody and just the news that CBS, CBS, CBN before. So I'm going to get to these three points in a second. I got to move on after that. To other more important points and an article in The Wall Street Journal, I strongly objected. It's going to be a loaded show. Let me get to my second sponsor first. Listen, you know, I've been dealing with arthritis my whole life. I constantly complain about it on this, probably to the detriment of the audience.

I'm sorry. It's just this is Dan Bongino show. And sometimes Dan Bongino problems creep into the Dan Bongino show. My joints are pretty much always hurting. Living with chronic pain is terrible. I know it's more than discomfort. It affects your whole life working out, sleeping everything, stopping me from exercising some days and the soreness afterwards. That's just muscle soreness. I mean, joints, soreness that really is unnecessary to live with. Get rid of the nagging pain while providing long lasting relief.

Do what we do here. Paula has a neck issue. She uses it for a neck. Try the natural break through pain relief solution, cryo free CBD, Rollan, develop Biomax Health. Ladies and gentlemen, this stuff really, really works. It's non-prescription triple action, pain relief. It's a roll on it, specially formulated to block pain receptors, reduce inflammation, improve muscle and joint flexibility. It's 100 percent natural CBD powered remedy. It works its magic.

Within ten minutes of application, relief lasts up to eight hours, much longer than over the counter products. The minute you roll it on your neck, meem. And Paula's case, the shoulders in my case, the cooling icing feeling with the CBT. It's just great for me. I we use it all the time. I use it on my elbows too. I've had to use it on my left knee, which is degenerating too. Sadly, this stuff works.

Oh Max. Health is offering a heavy discount. Twenty percent off a full bottle of cryo free CBD pain relief role on the discount. Also apply saiwai towards any product. Just go to Max Health Dotcom today and enter the promo code. Bongino Buongiorno. That is. Oh Max oh Max Health enter code by Gino. Get 25 percent of Krier fees and say what a pro athletes PGA golfers using cryo free CBT to recover both on and off the course.

Omak says 95 percent, five star reviews of customers saying they've tried everything and, oh, Max Cryo is so good they're buying it for their family and friends. Well, I wouldn't recommend that if it didn't work. We don't do that here. Simply roll it over where it hurts and nice out the pain. No messy creams or horrible fragrances go to I-Max Half.com and her code banknote to get 20 percent a 20 percent off cryo freeze and sitesi. That's all max out dot com and her code.

Bongino get 20 percent off site. Why thanks. So Max, we appreciate it. All right, back to Alan Dershowitz. This video there, which is profound. He brings up three points. I want to discuss them right now because they're critical to understanding the shamen. PEACHMENT Ladies and gentlemen, there was no high crime or misdemeanor. There was no crime at all. Tens of thousands of people with positions of prominence and power have recommended that people march on the capital.

When you have people who go there and commit violent acts at the Capitol, those people are held responsible, not the people who are the speakers. No, no, Dan, Dan, that can't be Dershowitz is wrong. I heard you can't yell fire in a movie theater. Ladies and gentlemen, fire in a movie theater is a sham for people who don't understand Brandenburg versus Ohio. That is not the standard, the. I am not an attorney and I don't pretend to be a no, I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night either.

But I'm not stupid and sane people can understand the law without having a JD behind their name by simply reading precedent. People who don't know what they're talking about and want to attack free speech every time say, oh, you can't say that Trump can't say fire in a movie theater which would endanger people's lives. They trample each other to get out of there. That is not the standard. The legal standard for speech that can be criminalized is speech that speaks of an and speech that incites imminent unlawful actions, imminent unlawful actions, not abstractions.

I want to be crystal clear. You have to specifically say in your speech to be charged under these standards, say something that incites an imminent and demands an imminent unlawful action, not an abstraction. Not we've got a fight, not we've got to show strength to what President Trump said, obviously not when he said march peacefully and patriotically how that would incite an imminent unlawful action. I'm not sure I don't get the legal logic there because there is none.

I've even Maxine Waters speech where she said, if you see anybody get in their face talking about members of the Trump cabinet, I've got bad news for people, and that's probably not criminal either, because it's an abstraction. If you see anybody, you get in their face. Now, if she would have say at the time, God forbid, Alex Azar, a cabinet member of Trump's, was sitting 20 feet away from Maxine Waters. And she said, go get in the face and attack Alex Azar right now, God forbid that's different.

You're inciting an imminent, unlawful an attack. Go do it now. Action. Saying get in the face of anybody on the you get to tell any of you gather is an abstraction. She likely would not be charged with anything. Don't mistake what I'm saying for sanctioning her idiocy and her normalising, sadly, of political violence. That's not what I'm saying. I'm here to tell you the truth. Dershowitz is right. Trump isn't guilty of any crime at all.

I don't know how urging people to march peacefully and patriotically is inciting unlawful action. I'm not sure. Finally, as I addressed before the second, we have it's no high crimes and misdemeanors, so this is unconstitutional. It's impeachment. Secondly, there's imminent law, unlawful action, a condition is not satisfied at all. And thirdly, Trump's going to be a private citizen on January 20th at noon. There's no trial in the Senate for a private citizen, only a president.

I don't I never read that in the Constitution elsewhere, but they can just pick a private citizen and charge him. All right, moving on, ladies and gentlemen, you know, again, I asked Joe during the break, how are we doing so far? And he's like, we're doing good under the circumstances. Ladies and gentlemen, we're trying our best here where we're really dealing with a tidal wave of negative information. And I have to triage and kind of segregate here and there.

What's more important. So let's move on. I don't have any time to waste. Let's get to this topic. Number two, there is absolutely no time and place for normalizing political violence. We know that. I've said it a thousand times. Why are you repeating yourself then? Because there are some out there who don't get this. You have even people now who have traditionally aligned with conservative and Republican values saying, oh, you know what, this what about ISM, where we cite Republican excuse me, Democrat and media examples of the media sanctioning violence during the Antifa BLM burning down of American cities.

That's what about Azman has no place here. You know, I read the Wall Street Journal. I appreciate their perspective. I always like it. I don't only read outlets that agree with me, but this is one of the most absurd pieces I've ever heard in the Wall Street Journal in my life. Wall Street Journal was a Jerry Baker wrote this. He's suggesting that any discussion we have now of bringing up a leftist and media condemnation. Yeah. General Baker.

Or the lack of media condemnation against antifa BLM riots and Democrats calling for violence against Trump. That's what about us. And we need that for another time. No, we need that. Now, here's the piece. No excuses for Trump in the Capitol, right? OK. Who's making them? That sounds to me like a deceptive headline. Here's the subhead, Yes, the left has bad things to conservatives are supposed to believe in objective moral truth.

Isn't that what I'm confused by this piece? He then goes on in the piece to criticize Joe. He goes on in the piece, right. To criticize what he calls. What about Azem? What we are talking, you understand, are those two things can't possibly align when you say, well, what about the media calling riots that were burning American cities down, getting police officers killed and injured and shot at and businesses burned down by the thousands across America?

When you call out the liberal media for calling those peaceful protests, that is a search for objective truth. Gerald or Gerard? What are you talking about? We're asking for a common set of principles moving forward as a country. Are we is normalizing political violence OK or not same people all across the aisle saying, no, it's not. Therefore, asking why it was seemingly OK by the cancel cultural elites and everyone else when it happened and the liberal media sanctioned political violence and in some cases condoned it, we are asking for an objective truth.

We're saying, why wasn't God OK? And I won't stop talking about it. You want to call it. What about Azem? You're damn right it is. It's what about principles? That A. ASOL and Morris in some sense of truth, so we're not all wondering at sea wondering what rules apply to one person and what rules apply to the other. That's not fidelity to a constitutional republic. That's a third world republic rules for the but not for me.

Condemn what happened in the capital. You're darn right, but don't condemn what happened there with a. BLM. You're darn wrong. That's a third world republic where the rules only apply to one. Conservatives have an objective moral truth. What a ridiculous piece. Here's what I'm talking about it, and we will continue to talk about this, despite what Gerard Baker has to say. You want to see the media's role in this? I'm not going to play any more montages.

You've heard them a million times. If you see anybody, you get up in your face. Maxine Waters. Was it receded to leave, we're going to the FAA. AOC, you know, sometimes protests, you know, not so bad, basically implying in a riot in one of her tweets. Let's go to GQ first. Again, we're sherrard on this, you want objective truth with this objective truth. Searching for a mooring going forward, so we're not all out at sea wondering what rules apply to who.

GQ. Why Violent Protests Work by Laura Bassett. By the way, I got to give a hat tip to some I forget who I found this on social media. I'm sorry, I'm not trying to steal your work. I really just been drinking from a firehose. I don't know if it was a Greg at The Daily Caller or Logan, but there is GQ. Here's Time magazine. When rioting is the answer. Darren, I thought we were searching for objective truth, is that objectively horrible to ask when rioting is the answer?

Or to ask when violent protests work. What about Azem, you're darn right, what about principal? Common principles. In a country where we can be. Faithful and faithful to our flag, and no, that flag represents something. What does it represent if you have one set of rules for one and one for the other? Here's Vox with a V, not Fox Vox. Riots are destructive, dangerous and scary. OK, but there's a but wait, where's the button there but can lead to serious social reforms.

Huh, that's fascinating. I thought that I thought we're looking for objective truth.

Yeah. I'm weird, yeah, I'm not done. No, there's more. Chicago Tribune, this is fascinating. This piece ran in their Chicago Tribune. Column, Steve Chapman May twenty nine, twenty twenty, if riots aren't the answer, what is? I don't know, Steve. Maybe a fidelity to the cause, voting in a constitutional republic where we don't beat the living out of our neighbors, maybe maybe that I'm just throwing that out there. What about the Democrats role, I felt we weren't allowed to discuss elections, I thought this is why I'm not.

Ladies and gentlemen, take your group think and send it somewhere. I'm not interested. We're not going to talk about election, we're not, you're not I'll talk about whatever I want. Let's look at this fox, this time with an FPS, Fox News. Which is in the show notes today, again, Bungeni dot com slash newsletter, please subscribe, folks. I know I've got a lot of ass for you lately, but I need you right now.

We have to be unified in this fight. Fox News Joseph Wolfson Twitters author, strangely and their strangely silent after Pelosi tweet declaring the twenty 2016 election was, quote, hijacked, resurfaces. Wait, wait I again. Gerard Baker is searching for an objective truth. I thought the objective truth is any discussion of election abnormalities is never to be tolerated, to be banned immediately. We are now look at the tweet, this is just strange from the 2016 election.

Pelosi tweeted this on the eve of Bob Mueller's appointment as a special counsel. To investigate the tape that was fake, of course. Here's Pelosi's actual tweet, twelve forty four p.m., May 16, twenty seventeen, our election was hijacked. I thought I thought you're not allowed to say that. Our election was hijacked, there is no question she's not even leaving it open for debate. So Congress has a duty to protect our democracy and follow the facts.

Still want to fall into that groupthink trap. There'll be no discussion of election integrity and free and fair elections. They won't. No, no, I meant let me be clear, I meant no discussion amongst Republicans actually interested in free and fair. If Dan. Thank you, Dan.

I mean, I know, Joe, you needed as the audience on budget. I can see you I could see you scratching your head like that. Doesn't make sense.

I don't I don't get it.

If you're going to invent the PPY hoax and appoint a special counsel to investigate a government sanctioned hoax by the FBI, which sanction this and investigated him, and then you're going to use it to question the election a year after the president's been in office, May of twenty seventeen and still questioning if that's OK if you're a Democrat. But daring to question unconstitutional law changes in Pennsylvania and elsewhere, no question they were unconstitutional. No, no. That'll get you banned everywhere, Ban.

You're looking for weakness, find it elsewhere. I'm not interested. I have crystal clear clarity in my life right now. It's never been clear. All right, let me get to my Parler segment next, they need you deserve what I can give you from the inside scoop of what's going on with Parlo. I've been getting a lot of questions about that, so it's really important. I got to get to that next. Let me get to my third sponsor, first up, our friends over it and yourself.

Thanks for sponsoring the show today, Gentzel. Very popular product in my household. Jenny Cellcom, Jenny Cellcom, the promotional code we love him is Dan 40, Dan four zero. Ladies and gentlemen, Charmaine's New Year's clearance clearance sale is on for a limited time right now. You can look five, 10, even 15 years younger, easily, safely and naturally with Charmaine's news. Otik deep correcting serum free with your order of Zhenyu sell for under Eyeborgs and puffiness so Teagues deep correcting serum the correct answer excuse me uses Liposomal technology to get the most effective proven levels of pure vitamin C down to the deepest layers of your skin for brighter, healthier and more vibrant, more vibrant looking appearance.

Leave those embarrassing, dark marks and scars back in twenty twenty and so TEAC increases firmness. Smoothness diminishes adult acne, redness and stress breakouts even say goodbye to the dreaded crow's feet and laugh lines. Plus, with its immediate effects, the results of twelve hours or less.

I get a very popular product. My mother in law, especially results, guaranteed a one hundred percent of your money back. That's the Sharmini promise misogynous sell Cellcom Zhenyu sell dot com Enter my special promo code Dan for zero That's Dan Fortia Check-Out Order Now get the classic Gen You sell Joline treatment and legendary Gentzel XXXVII Anti Rinkel moisturiser order now at eight hundred five two five six five five three or go to Jeonju sell dotcom that's Jianyu CEO Dotcom Chenu sell Viacom Zhenyu sell dotcom promo code Dan for zero.

Thank you. So. OK. A lot of you have been other emails on parler, wouldn't you say, Paula, are just nonstop and I want to. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I want to get emotional, but. This has been a raise, probably been. I don't know, Paula. You've been with me most of my adult life, to some the toughest week. You think so after we were talking last night about five significant negative events that have happened in our lives and I've been mcpaul a very long time.

And we were last night, like in this, like, weird exercise, trying to grade how awful they were and I think this has to be the worst. I finally got some sleep again last night. Travel that was yesterday was just an insane day. There are two states and seven medical appointments and shows in everything, all on the same day. But the war on parler behind the scenes, ladies and gentlemen, is even worse. Let me give you first just some quick inside scoop, and I want to get to the the general war on big tech is waging on free speech in America.

Folks, the fear being imposed behind the scenes by. Liberal hate groups and anti free speech advocates on anyone doing business with Parla is downright frightening. We've had an attack on websites, some associated with us. Am I going to go into details? But ladies and gentlemen, this is really serious. You may say to yourself, gosh, the situation with Parler where we were banned from Apple's App Store, a trillion dollar company banned from Google's App Store, another trillion dollar company, and wiped out from Amazon HWC servers where they effectively took us down from the Internet.

Basically, three trillion dollars or close to it, companies at war with parler, which is not a trillion dollar company. How can it get worse? Folks behind the scenes is brutal. Now we're fighting back. We have sued Amazon with a temporary. We have we're going to be suing Amazon, we've applied for a temporary restraining order in court. Amazon is going to be forced to comply and produce some evidence in court. Amazon, I believe in this, could be in real trouble, I'm not sure if we're going to win or not.

I'm not the lawyer on the case. I'm an investor in parler. I am not their legal department.

Speaking now as my show as a opinion journalist, but I am an investor in parliament, I'm trying to give you unbiased news, given that I know what's happening behind the scenes, folks, the pressure campaign from everyone down, the entire value added chain. To disavow parler will come for you next, you're already seeing it with Telegram and others, once they wipe one out and they've got the business model down, they will go right back down to the next one.

If you think if you are under some insane belief that this is going to end with parler and your side safe. Don't worry, we cater to conservatives who will be OK. Let's let those guys at Parler take all the incoming.

Good luck. Just go to any search engine today and put in telegram, you'll see what I'm talking about. Your next run in a conservative blog wait, though, someone in your neighborhood finds out. You have no idea the pressure being waged behind the scenes by everyone up and down the value added chain to wait father parler from the face of the earth today. We will be back, we will absolutely be back. I can't give you an absolute timeline, but I can tell you this, it will be soon, sooner than you think.

I need you to check every day, PRL, dotcom. And the minute we come back, I need you to send one big collective, you know what I'm talking about, to the left, their totalitarian media friends and their totalitarian tech tyrant friends. And please stand up for us and we will stand up for you. We are being bombarded with legal costs. We are being overwhelmed, they may have some news on that for those who want to help, I don't have it today, but I'm hoping to get something to get I'm trying my best.

We are being bombarded from every direction. As I said, it's not just us. Ladies and gentlemen, member Trish Regan used to be on Fox National come to know as a as a show. She has a website. Remember Trish, of course, Trish Intel. Well, this article up at the show notes today, YouTube suspends President Trump's account. Now, you know why I'm involved with Rumball. We don't discriminate based on political ideology at Rumbo, thank you, by the way, for getting us over one million subscribers at Rumbo Rumble, Dotcom Bongino.

Article number two, you think it ended with Apple, Amazon, YouTube, YouTube, which is owned by Google, Apple, PayPal, now here's Strike Stripe and Salesforce Red State, Nick Arena is that arena.

Now, Stripe and Salesforce are cutting off Trump and restricting the RNC, the RNC, the way you had of. You know, Joe, this is what bothers me, man, and just kind of segueing into like not a new suit, but the old segment. Don't let weak kneed Republicans now take over this party because they're the same weak kneed Republicans, some of them, not all of them in the RNC who are like, listen, if we condemn, Trump will be safe.

Really? You just got shut down by a major tech company. Oh, no, no. I don't know, that's not us. We're on your side, there's a side, what side is that? What side is that exactly? As I said last the last few weeks, I've been talking about unprincipled revolutions like the revolution, the tech people are in the middle of conducting against our Republican their war on free speech. Unprincipled revolutions always end badly because there are no sides, because there are no principles.

And famous last words when they come for you are I'm on your side. Cowards in the Republican Party, some of them thought, oh, we just condemn Trump will be safe. Good luck. Good luck. Oh, if we just call out parler will be is crazy parler, people will be safe. Good luck. Deutsche Bank now won't do business with Trump SRES, Joey said that last week it was only a matter of time before you're all bid banks wait till they find out in your neighborhood, your local bank gets wind, that you're the owner of a business that supported President Trump and you sell maybe Magots in your shop.

Wait till your next. Listen, folks, I'm not warning you to scare you. I'm warning you because it's real. Maybe some on the left who openly mocked my call four years ago openly, Mark. And set Dan Bongino conspiracy theory, talking about the need for a parallel economy, there's no war on conservatives. Maybe now I don't think they're laughing anymore. All right, let me just get back to parler quick and a quick update. I'm telling you, behind the scenes I have been on the phone about parler.

I have probably. Burned into my skull, I can't even imagine how many. What are they measured at Greys or whatever R.F. into my skull. I've been on the phone nonstop about Parlo with lawyers, co-owners, the CFO of the company. It is brutal behind the scenes. The totalitarians are in full force. Fox Business, so we're fighting back, folks. And Amazon were fighting back against Amazon, specifically, Amazon is not telling the truth. Fox Business.

Amazon hits back at Parler lawsuit claims that Parlo was unwilling and unable to remove violent content. Ladies and gentlemen, that is a lie that is inaccurate. Violent content clearly violates our terms of service. We had a process we were not unwilling to remove it, nor would we enable unable to do it. And I'm just curious why you're not concerned about the violent content on Twitter, I'll get to the New York Post headline in a minute. You know what?

Let me get to my last sponsor, because I want to get into two things here. A Wall Street Journal article that is absolutely fantastic. I'm going to motor through the talks about how I'm still hearing this, which is. Candidly, bizarre. I am still hearing out there that, Dan, this is not a First Amendment issue. These are private companies. You sure about that? Talk about this Wall Street Journal article in a second, even on Mad at your Gerard Baker.

This piece is amazing. All right. Let me get to my last sponsor, our friends at Patrimonial. Ladies and gentlemen, if there were if there was ever, ever a time to convert from your cell phone provider now to Patriot Mobile, today is the day we want to talk about a parallel economy. Patriot Mobile is taking on mobile, the mobile provider swamp, they have exciting news to share, just like I'm taking on the big tech tyrant's Patriot mobile just expanded their coverage.

It'll make it easier for even more Americans to dump the big name carriers who charge way too much anyway and then donate the money to left this. I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile because they never send a penny to the left. They are America's only proud Christian conservative wireless provider provider. Switch with confidence today because they used the same network as the larger providers, but charge you much less. Switching is easy. Keep your phone number. Bring your own phone or buy a new one.

Build your own bundle with multiline discounts and save even more. Here's how you do this. And I ask you to do it today. Go to Patriot Mobile dotcom, slash down or call their US based customer service team at nine seven two Patriot. That's nine seven two Patriot, that is. Veterans and first responders save even more this month. Get free premier activation where they set up the phone for you and a special gift with the offer code. Dan, that's Patriot mobile dotcom slash.

Dan, go today. Patriot mobile dotcom slash. Dan, go today or call 911 to Patriot. Thanks, Patriot Mobile. Folks, which with regard to the war on parler. By the big tech trillion dollar titans, there are two questions I like to some things up easily. I want to get the headline out up front. There are two questions at stake here. For those of you arguing this is it's a free market, Dan, these are free market companies.

They can do what they want, really. So free market companies are not allowed to engage in monopolistic behavior where they coordinate with each other to squelch trade, that is not the free market. Just checking, Joe, if big companies are coordinating to stop other entrants from getting into the market. It's not a free market, is it? It's a coordinated anti free market. Just checking.

You're good. Thank you again. Audience Ombudsmen's always has the ground as a free market means entrants and competitors are free to compete if you're not free to compete because big companies are acting in coordination with each other to shut you out. That is the very antithesis of a free market. It's a corrupt market, so question one, which we're going to answer now. Was this a coordinated hit on parler question to. Are these really private companies or are these companies acting on behalf of the government, which legal precedent is everywhere, says it's totally illegal.

If the government can't do something, it can't force and coerce a private company into doing it for it. Do you understand that? I'll get to that in a minute. I want to start with question number one was this. Hit on parler, Amazon, Apple and Google, and it was a hit. Was this hit on parler coordinated? Seems like Twitter may have gotten itself in a bit of hot water yesterday, hat tip Mike Sandrich, by the way, for these highlights on these tweets.

This is from Twitter's actual account on Twitter. Talking about Twitter being shut out of the Ugandan national election, not a joke, folks. Twitter. Earlier this week, in close coordination with our peers, we suspended a number of accounts targeting the election in Uganda. If we can attribute any of this activity to state backed actors, we will disclose to our archive of information operations. Close coordination without without without without peer. You know, Joe, you know, it would be really weird what if in a lawsuit against Twitter and elsewhere and in the discovery phase discovery stage, we found that there was close coordination with their peers to make sure Parler went away?

Did that happen?

I don't know. But it just seems kind of weird that Twitter put out in their own public platform that they closely coordinate with their peers. Let's go to ironic tweet number two, the gold medal in the Irony Awards for twenty twenty one. I think this will be the gold medal for the rest of the year, even though we're still in January. Here's another screenshot again, Hatami, my service for the highlights here of Twitter acknowledging some basic human rights.

Wow. They say the second part of this, we strongly condemn Internet shutdown. This is not a hoax. This is not the onion. This is real Twitter. We strongly condemn Internet shutdowns. Let's keep this up. This is the Twitter that shut down on the Internet distribution on their portion of the era of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Twitter now strongly condemns Internet shut. This is this must be an attempt at humor. They are hugely harmful and violate basic human rights and the principles of the open Internet.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a joke. This is a real tweet by Twitter. So Twitter acknowledges two things. Was this a coordinated. Monopoly acting together these these trillion and billion dollar companies to crush the competition. Twitter seems to be acknowledging in their own tweet that they closely coordinate with their peers. Their words, not mine. Oh, damn. But that was just about the Ugandan election, was it? We'll have to see about that.

And they acknowledge that access to the open Internet they've shut down in their portion of the Internet is a violation of basic human rights. Really weird how that happens. Now, again, some of you out there who may still be under the delusion, especially on the left, is still laughing about that tweet. But yeah, exactly, but they block the president. That's not a violation of basic human rights in. Some of you still may be a small boy, I don't think there's many left at this point.

Even the libertarians like Ken Buck in Congress are starting to come around to the fact that we answer the first question. This could be coordinated. Could be we'll see. Second, was this a de facto government action, in other words? Oh, it's a private company. It can do what they want. It's not a private company. If they are acting on behalf of the government, there's precedent for that. Let's go to this Wall Street Journal article, which, again, to be fair to the Journal, this is an amazing article.

This one, even a Wall Street Journal subscription only. I got it. I don't think it's behind a paywall. It's in the show notes today. You need to read this printed and thumbtack it to your door. Save the Constitution from big tech. Constitutional congressional threats and inducements make Twitter and Facebook censorship of free speech violation. They are government actors. Let's go through these screenshots one at a time, because they are absolute magic. From the Wall Street Journal piece, Conventional wisdom holds that tech companies are free to regulate content because they're private and the First Amendment protects only against government censorship.

That view is wrong. Google, Facebook and Twitter should be treated as state actors under existing legal doctrines. Using a combination of statutory inducements and regulatory threats, Congress has co-opted Silicon Valley. To do through the back door what government cannot directly accomplish under the Constitution, Ingo.

This is not a private actor. Free speech argument in that Twitter has free speech because they're a private act, they can do what they want, they are acting and others on behalf of government inducements and threats. And you said there's legal precedent for this. This is a show for people with triple digit IQ. Let's hear it. We're ready for it. Let's lay it out. Norwood versus Harrison, screenshot number one from Twitter. Our number two quote from the Wall Street Journal piece.

It is axiomatic the Supreme Court held the Norwood versus Harrison in nineteen seventy three, that the government quote liberals is a quote, meaning the Supreme Court said this For those of you confused, may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish itself. That's what Congress did by enacting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which not only permits tech companies to censor constitutionally protected speech, but immunizes them from liability if they do so.

So the government can't violate the First Amendment and stop your constitutionally protected free speech unless you induce going back to the beginning, imminent unlawful action, not abstractions. But Twitter can do it for them. That's not what the Supreme Court said. Wonder how Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, Apple and Google are going to answer for that one. Then Amazon and them were acting on behalf of the government. Certainly appears that way. You don't believe me, let's look at screenshot number three from the Wall Street Journal piece where they actually lay it out.

Quote, Section 230 is the carrot, but there's also a stick. Congressional Democrats have repeatedly made explicit threats to social media giants if they fail to censor speech. Those lawmakers disfavored. In April of twenty nineteen, Louisiana Representative Cedric Richmond, excuse me, warned Facebook and Google that they had, quote, better restrict what he and his colleagues saw as harmful content or face or face regulation. Another quote from Richmond. We're going to make it swift. We're going to make it strong.

We're going to hold them very accountable and quote. New York Rep. Jerry Nadler added, quote, Let's see what happens by just pressuring them. Joe, sounds to me like United States government representatives with a whole lot of power using a air quotes private company to do what they can't do themselves, then it's sound that. Yeah.

Yeah, like a proxy or something else. We're probably here by proxy. By I good. You know, like Munchausen by proxy.

It's very strange, huh? Now, for those liberals having a tough time understanding why government coercing private companies to engage in illegal, unconstitutional actions, liberals have a tough time understanding that because liberals don't have principles. Liberals are only interested in attacking conservatives because of the golden rule of what I told you. We think liberals are people with bad ideas. Liberals and conservatives are bad people with ideas so should be wiped from the public space forever.

So let's give an example and let's use. Let's play what I like. Let's go, let's do a little role play, let's go to this last screen shot here where we flipped the script a little bit and see if liberals are OK with coercing private actors to engage in government actions when it doesn't meet your ideological totalitarian goals. Let's check this out. This is genius from the Wall Street Journal piece. Either Section 230 or congressional pressure alone might be sufficient to create state action.

The combination surely is. But let's suppose a Republican Congress enacted a statute this is interesting, Joe, listen to this closely. So Republicans say they enacted a statute giving legal immunity to any private party that obstructs access to abortion clinics.

Oh, we didn't think of that. Suppose further that Republican congressmen explicitly threatened private companies with punitive laws if they fail to act against abortion clinics. Those companies did, as Congress demands, then got an attaboy from lawmakers, progressives would see a constitutional problem. You think? They would think. So with the Constitution, what would Republican lawmakers say they can't do themselves block abortion clinics? Can't do themselves now, right, because they don't have the votes for it, so let's say they do get it and they pass a law saying, oh, ya know, if Joey bag of donuts does it, you're immune from any lawsuits from abortion because you see how all of a sudden liberals who think abortion is a sacrament all of a sudden are like, no, no, that's I I'm uncomfortable with that.

But I'm totally comfortable with Twitter wiping out the press. The United States after being threatened by lawmakers who couldn't do it themselves and wiping out the president's voice on one of the largest social media platforms in the world, Twitter and Facebook. I'm totally cool. Cool with that. Oh, Dan, Cedric Richmond, that's just one lawmaker, how does that relate to what happened with Parler in the full fledged assault on. Oh, look at this tweet from Democratic radical liberal Congressman Rokita, who put on his own Twitter account, I believe is yet to delete this.

Quote, Parla is hosted by Amazon Web Services. Amazon should deny parler services until January 21st unless they commit to removing all persse posts related to incitement to violence concerning the inauguration. This will help prevent further violence and save lives. Strange after a Democratic congressman incited Twitter to squelch free speech. That's exactly what they want with what they did. Wow, wow, wow. Oh, Dan, that's only now two examples, actually, three, Jerry Nadler, that's it, there's no no, actually, they're all over the place, but in the interest of time, running it through a few.

Let me give one more the noted A. Civil Liberties Advocate AOC, who absolutely hate civil liberties, freedom and stuff. Here's AOSIS Twitter account, blue checkmark. So we know it's her. Of course. She wants to know what Apple and Google Play are doing about this, and there's a tweet, Sleeping Giants, it's not available to me because they blocked me a long time ago, sleeping giants, which, of course, was trying to call out and get parler de platform because that's what they do, because they're anti civil liberties advocates to.

She says, What's Apple and Google Play, Joe, be a real shame if your store burned down. There you go. What are they doing about Parler? And she follows it up with another one. Good to see this development from Apple and Google Play. What are you going to do about apps being used to organize violence on your platform? What does she say is good to see an article? About Apple threatening parler. Tell me again how these are private private companies.

I'd like. What's interesting is she didn't have much to say about Twitter, where she's a blue checkmark. This is on the cover of The New York Post today with The New York Post has a story about what Twitter won't censor. Big tax purge of hate and parla is pure hypocrisy, it's a bunch of tweets on the front cover The New York Post today. Basically calling for the death and arrest of Donald Trump, including a trending hashtag on Twitter, Kill Trump.

Hmmm, I thought this was about violence show on social platforms. Yeah, I took you and I talk a lot to friends and people who kind of work on stuff together. That was that's what I'm confused. I am, too. We were told by I know I profoundly if I'm trying to. Was that life?

Was it my cousin inconvenience you? Yeah. Let me try to confuse you. Is my cousin Joe Pesci then. Yeah, please do. Joe and I have been talking a lot. He's been trying to you know. Get me through the chaos of the few days, Paula, to I was told as an investor in Parler that Amazon, Apple and Google had removed us because this was all about violence on their platforms. Strangely enough, Twitter is allowed to exist and you have hashtags.

Kill Trump, arrest Trump, assassinate Trump. Really, really, really absurd how we haven't heard much.

Strange. OK, I have to get this last story, I know it's going to be a bit of a longer show today, but this story is important. Ladies and gentlemen, I have tried now for three days, I know you get it because you listen to my show, but unfortunately to discredit a fake news story that is a thousand percent is fake, but that's never stopped the media before. Once I tell them it's fake from continuing to run with the story because liberal media lunatics are liars.

They hate my guts and they hate parler. Because they're liberal activists. CNN again, title this segment and my little notes here, evolution of a fake news hit. This story was designed for suckers and suckers are eating it up. This is opinion piece by Nicole Hemmer, who apparently is not smart enough to have watched my show the other day, the story's already been discredited. Not coincidentally, you're not smart, you write at CNN Headline, this is the right wing media platform in a microcosm.

What is she referencing again? A story for suckers because it's been discredited six different ways from Sunday, the fake news story, that Cumulus Media. Told me, Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro, you better stop talking about the election or you will be terminated immediately. I sadly have to do this again, that there was an internal memo sent around from Cumulus Media. And that they imply me, Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro were ordered what to say on our show about the election.

Now, Joe, you work with us on these audio items. Did you get that memo?

Do you think they'd send it to me? But no, I didn't. Now, Joe Joe's a producer on the show. You think he did? I know. I know you would have. You know, it's not in his spam folder. I asked him to check that Drew didn't get it. Paul, you know, Paul is getting a big no get Paul, who runs the believe me, Bongino Enterprise Zappala operation. That's awfully strange how the Washington Post, The New York Times and CNN all seemingly have a coordinated story that Dan Bongino, Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro were ordered.

Ordered to stop talking about election integrity. The story's fake. So to prove to you it's fake, I'm going to put a proposition out there because unlike people on the left, I tell you the truth, and I've got the cojones to put my mouth and put my the put my legal and financial muscle where my mouth is. Number one, I don't work for cumulous cumulous is nothing more than a sales rep for my show. So that's fate, anyone telling you I work for Cumulous is lying?

If you can send me that employment agreement with Cumulous that doesn't exist, I'd love to hear it. Joe, do you work for Cumulous? Not that I know of, Dan. Yeah, OK.

Joe would know Joe's owns his own company. Paula Paul has no employment agreement either. Either either. Do I. Weird how that was implied in these stories. It's fake, it's fake. Doesn't matter. Washington Post, New York Times and CNN, of course, it's fake. Number two, the guy at Cumulus who supposedly sent this memo that me and Schapira supposedly received or as I say, when I was a kid supposably. But Skerries, they said that, too, I don't know who the hell Brian Phillips is.

I've never heard of this guy in my entire life. I have no idea who this man is. It's not personal. I don't know Brian Phillips, how could Brian Phillips let's do this little exercise here on the air. So here's my inbox. Let's put in a search function here. Brian Phillips, let's spell his name right, let's search search for emails from Brian. Oh, there are none. That's really strange. Brian Phillips from Cumulous supposedly sent me and our team here and order what we were supposed to talk about or not talk about on our show from Cumulous.

That's really strange because I never got the email. But that's the whole core of the story. Exactly, it's fake. So let me put a wager out there, and I am dead serious about this, I am as serious as a heart attack. And I will write this check myself. I'm offering today this is not a joke. One hundred thousand dollars of my own money. To a journalist who can produce that exact internal memo referenced in that Washington Post story from Brian Phillips.

And show my email address on that, that specific email. You wrote about it, you implied I was on it. Now, grow some holidays and let's see you back your story up a retractor, I will pay you one hundred thousand dollars. I am not kidding if you can produce that internal email with my email address on it. If not, your story is fake, right? It's not a joke I will write you. I am so confident, but it's funny, Paul and I said, Paul, it doesn't make me a million dollars because it's not going to happen because we never got the email.

But if you're Paul Farhi from The Washington Post. Tiffany shoe at The New York Times and and the guy who wrote the woman who wrote that opinion piece, Hemmer at the CNN piece, if you can produce that email, I will give you personally. I'll write you a check for one hundred thousand dollars. Rob, write it off as a business expense. Or admit you just made up the story. Now, why did they make up the story?

I'm not going to do the screenshots, I'm having a. m. they they wrote the story for one reason to put a target on my back. Levin's back in Shapiro's back. And secondly, because they want to see the Fairness Doctrine, which if you I wouldn't even click on it, but if you read the dreadful misinformed lying CNN piece by Miss Hemer, which is a lie, we were not sent this email. Any implication is a lie. They want to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, which would effectively cancel conservative radio.

That's why so ly let the law evolve, the lies called out by me is a lie. It doesn't matter. Write a new piece anyway and then use the tragedy to magnify a lie to get conservative silence on public airwaves, to bring back the dreaded Fairness Doctrine, which Joe knows well will crush conservative radio forever. Let me add one more thing about the phantom cumulous email that never happened. And I know Joe can attest to this to. Even if we had received it, which we didn't, you can produce it 100 K is yours.

Well, the memo, whatever they call it. Even if we had received it, we would have ignored. Period. I from you two of. We get an answer from Joe, that's three for three. No, tell me what to say on my show ever. You don't like it, be it. I believe in free speech, you don't like my show, don't listen. I don't like liberal shows. I don't like listening to Moscow, Maddow, so you know what I do, I don't watch MSNBC.

I don't even like watching the movie Deep Impact because it's about NBC and I love that movie. I have to turn it off now. Freedom, you know, kind of a cool thing. She probably preserved. Thanks again for tuning in, I have a few asks and I I'm sorry if I sound aggressive, but I need your help, please. Again, parler dotcom, PRL, E.R., PR, Eliade, Dotcom. Please keep checking it.

We will be back shortly. Hopefully by this weekend, maybe by Monday, police and police, not only you open up accounts, you have your friends open up accounts, everyone. Everyone, please, we need these alternative platforms to succeed if they take down parlor's over second, please go to my Rumball account where again, it's all free. It is a free speech alternative to YouTube dotcom slash Bongino. Thank you. We are over one million subscribers now.

Rumbold Dotcom slash Mancino. Please do not watch any more videos on YouTube. Watch him there. Thank you for your support. I read your emails. It means the world to me. You've got me through a serious crisis in the last week. Thank you. I see your mom.

You just heard Dan Bongino.