Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.

OK, facts matter. Facts matter. What if we say facts don't care about your feelings? They don't. Facts are facts. Sometimes facts are hard for us to take. Sometimes facts support our arguments. Sometimes they don't. What does that have to do with the show? Today, I'm going to go through the hard, cold facts about what happens in a disputed election on January 6th at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Thirteen hundred military hours. What does that in Zulu?

I don't know. Thirteen hundred military time. What happens? Well, the answer is what happens is the Electoral College votes are counted. And there's a lot of stories out there in the media about the vice president's role. But it's Congress do. It's a disputed election. Obviously. What happens, I'm going to walk through it step by step. Also, an update on Facebook. Facebook, is that it again, interfering in another election on my page, I'm going to show you evidence that's irrefutable, how insane Facebook's gotten.

And quick update on the Alara Baldwin. Paula told me it's Ilari. Not horrible, but that I know. I'm sorry, but there's so much involved there. And another abomination out of the state of Georgia, a legal ruling about the election that will tragically make you laugh. It's so ridiculous. Today show both your expressive ladies and gentlemen get a VPN today and protect your online activity from prying eyeball. Surf the web and peace. Go to express VPN Bunji.

No, don't wait. Welcome to the Dan Bongino show producer. Joe, how are you today, my friend?

I'm doing good, man. How you feeling? Look at a little while, I'm going to ring my own chemo bell today. Yesterday was my hopefully not going away with some weather we have around here. Knock on wood. I'm not really superstitious, but my last chemo treatment. This is the Kenny Bell. Kenny, I hope you're OK. We're going to make it the chemo about today, the Kenny Bell's three rings. So I'm going to ring my own chemo bell.

Hopefully my last treatment yesterday. Yeah, maybe one more for good luck. Sounds good. Thank you, Candy, for sending the bell. So, yes, I'm feeling OK. No hiccups. I feel I told you I never do a show if I didn't feel up to it. And I feel good today. So thank you for your concerns. You all been with me. All right. Let's get right to it today. Show to my friends at you cell.

Ladies, gentlemen, Sharmini extended their Christmas and holiday season sale. Nice for a limited time. Give yourself the gift, the priceless gift of looking years younger. We Sharmini brand new zoek deep correcting serum, absolutely free with your order. The new tzatziki correcting serum from Sharmini mean skin that's smooth as silk, free from redness, acne and acne scars and faster collagen production so teac increase its firmness smoothness and diminishes adult acne, redness and stress breakouts. Even say goodbye to those dreaded crow's feet, crow's feet and Laflin.

Somebody wants those with its immediate effects see results. In twelve hours or less, everyone will see the difference guaranteed to 100 percent of your money back. This is a Paula Mangino favorite, I must say. It's given us the Vogue look there. That's the Sharmini promised visit. Jenny Cellcom. Jenny, you saw that? Here's a promo code. Everybody loves promo codes. Dand 40. That's Dan for zero. And there that check out for even more holiday savings.

Treat yourself, get Japanese brand new zoek deep correcting serum there. Krystal's that all micra dermabrasion treatment exfoliating mask and a surprise luxury gift all free with your order today. Plus free upgrade to priority shipping. Jenny saw that comet G10 UCL dot com Jenny Cybercom enter Dan four zero a check out for even more savings.

All right, so let's go with the real back. Yep. There you go. I got a nice compliment about people like that.

So someone sent me an email there say that I know it's time to get into it, so we appreciate it. Sounds good. All right. Let's get right to the show today. So here are the hard, cold facts about the role of Congress and the vice president January six. Ladies and gentlemen, it's important. I said Mitty's I do exclusively on parler before the show. Every morning I'm at Debone Jeno Impaler, if you'd like to follow me.

There's a lot of confusion, can the vice president pick which slate of electors, here's the long and short of it on January 6th, coming up right away. Right quick. Right quick. My friends down south say. At 1:00 p.m., they will start counting and the Electoral College votes up in the capital to certify that election. OK, now that is according to both procedures in the Constitution and three USC 15 combined.

The procedure was more clearly delineated later in this Electoral Electoral College count that in the late eighteen hundreds, after some disputes of how the procedure was supposed to work, there's a ton of confusion. Can the vice president unilaterally pick which electors? If there's a dispute, we're going to go through it piece by piece. I went through the I think the entire Internet yesterday. I think because I had four hours in the chemo chair, I think I searched the whole Internet then that's not possible.

So hyperbolic. It's close to possible because I wanted the best piece that explained it in plain English. So we don't have to be legal scholars, every one of us, to figure out what the hell's going on. Here it is, EPIK Times, great job, by the way, if you want to read the piece, subscribe to my newsletter, Toll Free Bonds. That newsletter just click subscribe or send these articles right to you. This one's great epic times walks through piece by piece.

Not even that long. You read it. You'll be a constitutional scholar tomorrow. This is by Peter five, who does great work. The power of the vice president to count or reject electoral votes is disputed. So let's lay out the parameters. January 6th, they're going to count these electoral votes. There's a dispute in many states which slate of electors, in other words, the Donald Trump win that state or lose that state? There's a dispute, is there not?

If there wasn't, I wouldn't be talking about it. There's a dispute over Pennsylvania. Two hundred thousand people whose votes were counted, who didn't vote. We covered that yesterday. I can't go through it again today. Watch yesterday show you get the full details. Two hundred thousand people, allegedly votes were counted. Who didn't vote weird. OK. So let's go through step one, what exactly is supposed to happen on January 6th at 1:00 p.m., this is kind of important stuff to know this, because the media doesn't want to do any research.

So what's left except the people like me who do actual reporting to tell you from the Epic Times piece, here's how it's supposed to work.

The counting of votes is primarily governed by the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the amended Electoral Count Act. That's what I talking about before the Constitution simply states this, that electors of each state have to meet and make a list of their votes. Here's the exact wording which they shall sign and certify. So electors from the states have to me sign this that who their electoral votes are for and certify them.

They then send those to the president of the Senate, meaning Vice President Mike Pence. OK, sounds like a simple procedure. Florida voted for Donald Trump. They have twenty nine electoral votes. Each of the twenty nine electors from Donald Trump. Donald Trump sign. Yes, we are submitting our votes for Donald Trump. They make it up to the capital. The tellers from the House and the Senate picked them up. Open the envelopes by vice president reads them.

Vice president says Florida, Donald Trump, anybody, audience ombudsman show any confusion there? No, no, no. Kaffee. Pretty simple stuff, right? Wow. Not so much. That's how it's supposed to work. Of course, as with everything in that process, in a free society, there's always going to be disputes about what exactly each and every word means. So here's how disputes over who want to state and there are dispute. There's liberal media people listening who will pretend there aren't.

I don't care. You get the double barreled, if you know what I mean. The double barreled index finger, because the video version should be somewhat family friendly. We don't care what you think. There are disputes in Michigan. There are disputes in Pennsylvania. There are disputes in Georgia. Thank you. Period. Full stop. Here's how. According to this Epic Times piece, which is very well done, here's how disputes are supposed to work.

Thanks to three USC 15, this electoral count, the act that they passed in the late eighteen hundreds. Check this out. It says, quote, Then, in rather convoluted language, the law, again, they're talking about this three USC, 15 USC stands for United States Code, says that Congress members can object. So keep this up, if you don't mind me, Paula. So as these tellers open the Electoral College votes from each state like Florida and read them, members can object, say, hey, I don't think Trump won Florida, whatever.

Now, how does the how does the objection work, at least one objection from each chamber is needed to trigger a separate vote by the House and Senate on the objections. In other words, say, excuse me, forgive me, folks have to deal with this throughout the show today. It's the one downside of chemo that drives me crazy. The hiccups and the. So I'm very sorry, I just can't edit it all out of the show and we're doing our best, though.

All you need is one congressman and one senator to object and say, if Joe again, follow me is the audience ombudsman. I object to Florida going for Trump. If that happens, a separate vote is taken on the House and Senate floor about the objections. If both chambers agree that the objections legitimate, then the objected voters are rejected. That's virtually out of the question, given that the Democrats own the majority in the House. So if someone were to say, in other words, hey, I think Donald Trump won Georgia, I object even though according to the current tally, he didn't.

They have to vote on it. The Democrats run on the House. Democrats are going to say, forget the objection. You're out, everybody tracking. Pretty simple, right? If two sets of electors are presented for counting. The House and Senate need to separately vote on which set of electors submitted by the state legitimate and which should be rejected if each chamber votes differently. Here we go. The Senate certified by the state's governor should count. That would hand the victory to by.

This is not as complicated as it sounds, they actually do very well. I know most of you get it. But let's say a state submits two sets of electors, Georgia sends electors that say Donald Trump won. And electors that say Joe Biden won. There's a separate vote on that about which set of electors to pick tracking ombudsman Joe yet? If there's a difference, meaning, say, the Democrat House says, no, no, we think Biden won Georgia and say the Republican Senate will talk about the US Senate, not they remember the state of Georgia is already submitted to separate set of electors if the Senate, the US Senate says, because it's run by Mitch McConnell, the Republicans.

No, no. We think the Georgia set of electors for for Trump won Georgia. Then what happens then? What's supposed to happen is the electors signed off by the governor, who's a Republican governor of Georgia, Brian Kemp, which would be the ones that say Biden won, those are supposed to be accepted. OK, some of you now are probably tracking everyone. Some of you now are like, are you giving me the go ahead to my overexplaining?

Too much is over there. OK, so just I have to show he says good editorial page for the show. I thought she was giving me to come on, speed it up. So just to be clear, it seems pretty straightforward, but some of you who are a little more legally savvy than the rest of us who may be lawyers, paralegals, or you do a lot of homework into this stuff we're covering a lot of other news are saying.

Where's that in the Constitution? So if two separate electors from Georgia, one say Biden won, one say one set of electors say Trump won are submitted. And the US House says because there's a dispute, Biden won and the US Senate says Trump won, then we have to accept the ones that governor signed up. Where exactly is that in the Constitution? I don't know, because it's not. Let's go on a lot of screenshots from this piece, but it's good worth reading through.

Here's some problems with that, and I quote from the Epic Times, The problem is there's a voluminous body for liberals that means a lot voluminous body of legal analysis, arguing that the Electoral Count Act, again, three USC 15, if you'd like to look it up, it's unconstitutional. Congress has no business granting itself the authority to decide which slate of electors is the correct one and which votes should be rejected. Nor does Congress have the power to designate state governors as the final arbiters.

A lineup of legislators and legal scholars have argued this again for the liberals missing. We would call this producer, Joe Garretti, a dispute dispute, a dispute which you would think the media like we're doing in the epic time, is covering fairly. I'm only giving you the facts that there are credible legal scholars on both sides of this debate saying the procedure now, if there's a dispute about who wins the state, one, a state that can't be resolved amongst the House and Senate of the US Congress, then we should accept who the governor of the state signed off on that slate of electors.

There is a legal dispute about the media. There's no legal no, no, no. There is very smart people say that's not in the Constitution. Some others say, well, we've written the law that way according to what the US has said. So that's the law. That's the dispute. Very simple. But it is a dispute. That's a fact. And again, to quote, bad facts don't care about I don't care about your feelings, I'm just telling you what the facts are.

There is a credible legal dispute about that process. Who anointed the governors kings? The states that the Constitution doesn't say anything about the governor's role, nowhere, sorry. Here are the two sides to the argument, I again, unlike media outlets not patting myself on the back, a lot of good people do this on a great podcasters and media people out there. I'm going to give you both sides. And here's another crazy opinion, Joe. I'm going to allow you the very smart audience I have.

God bless your souls. I read your emails, your brilliant. I'm going to let you figure out for yourself. Oh, what a crazy thought. I'll give you both sides here side won the argument that the vice president. The vice president currently, Mike Pence, obviously has sole authority here to pick the electors in the dispute, not the governor's. Let's put up the Epic Times piece, save this piece, it's really very Kansteiner said it two or three times, but it's worth your time.

Oh, crap, I get the hiccups. Sorry, folks, I'm hoping it's just mild. Some jurors say it's the vice president has the sole discretion to decide which votes to count. The argument is that the framers intended for the vice president to be the sole authority over the counting of the votes because the unanimous resolution attached to the Constitution said that the Senate should appoint its president, quote.

For the sole purpose of receiving opening and counting votes for the president. So there you go. There is one side of the argument. You know what? Can you throw that up one more time? I just want to read that last part of one side of the argument is the vice president, Mike Pence, has the sole purpose of receiving opening and counting the votes for president. All right. Come back. I just want to make sure you heard that one side of the legal argument is, no, it's not about the governors and it's not about anything else other than the vice president having the authority to do that.

That's one side. There is another side to this, another side, by the way, and listen, folks. There are conservatives forget the liberals are sadly not all, but many most liberals aren't serious people. They're not interested in serious legal arguments. Everything is about their feelings and emotions. And when they have the sads, I mean, pat them on the back, rub their heads. There are conservatives on both sides of the aisle, just so we're clear.

And I'm talking about faith concerns about real conservatives. There are some conservatives who say, yes, the vice president can say no, those electors matter. Got it. Very simple. Disputed electors. Georgia sends two slates. Vice president could say it's no Trump won. Some good conservatives believe that some other good conservatives say that's insane. That's not how it works. And like you would think actual media people would do, we're going to give you the other side in the Epic Times piece.

Let's go to the other side. Just so we're clear, again, there are two sides to this with good, solid people. This this is a little bit about this, about two and a half paragraphs or so. But I want you to listen this because it's important. Because I'm getting a lot of e-mails. Dan, the vice president has the absolute authority, folks, that's not it's not exactly that clear. And I'm not going to spin your wheels.

I absolutely refuse to let you make your own decisions. Here's the second side of it. Quote, Epic times. The second argument is that the Constitution. Constitution. Our US Constitution grants the authority to determine how electors are picked, two state legislatures as such, any disputes over which votes should be counted should be resolved by state legislatures. The Constitution does say that. The problem is state legislatures aren't in session and they can assemble in a special session without a call from the governors.

Who have refused to call them back. Meanwhile, the legislatures have usually delegated the power to certify electors to the governors and secretaries of state, undermining their own authority on the matter. The conservative Amistad Project of the Thomas Moore Society has filed a federal lawsuit arguing that the power of the legislatures is both exclusive and non delegate ball and thus any state federal statutes to the contrary are unconstitutional and void. Folks, again, anyone presenting this to you as a simple argument is just I'm sorry, they're not telling you the truth.

There is a credible dispute amongst credible conservatives who are fighting the good fight over who picks what slate of electors, essentially who won each state, who picks them. If they're if there's a dispute, if there's no listen, there's no dispute over you want a one New York Califf. Right. I think we all get that Biden won New York and California. There's also no dispute over who won Texas or Florida. Trump, Trump, everybody clear if there's a dispute, there is a legitimate legal dispute based on the reading of the Constitution and subsequent law about who picks.

Is it Mike Pence or is it state legislatures? You may say simply read the Constitution. It's very clear state legislatures, they're not in session number one. And number two, the state legislatures have already said we don't want that power. We're giving it to the governor or secretary of state in our state. Dan, give us an answer who's right? Folks, the whole school of ethics. Is based on the massive grey areas we have in society, there would be no ethics courses if everything was black and white, right?

If the answers were obvious, why would you have the course? Be arguing over, you know, 10 plus 10 equaling 20. But this isn't mathematics algorithms. Trigonometry, the quadratic equation, that's not what this is. This is a law. And the law that sometimes seems black and white, the Constitution delegates the power to legislate state legislatures isn't because it also delegates powers to the vice president. In this case, it appears to be powers that conflict because state legislatures have turned their powers over to the governor.

I don't have an easy answer for you. I can tell you I'm leaning towards option to. And I must say. Some of the attacks on Pensabene grotesque. A good man, he's trying his best under very difficult conditions. Am I going out on a limb by saying that no one has asked me to say that a good man is a very difficult conditions? This is a really tough dispute going on right now. And I think it needs to be handled responsibly, like many of you are and many of the media class aren't.

And it's really sad. All right, moving on, you know what, let me get to my second sponsor today, a good friend of ours, Rock Auto, Joe's personal favorite, I think after maybe rock audio of Gerada Joe loves Ride Joe Love the Rock got along before they became a boss. Let me get that. And then coming up, important because it's important. Now, again, it's a story about Facebook, but it's not necessarily about Facebook.

It's a story about election interference right now in the Senate race in Georgia. And I can't believe the FEC is allowing this to happen today. Also brought to you by Rock On. Hey, chain stores have different price tiers for professional mechanics and do it yourselfers like Joe Rock auto dotcoms. Prices are the same for everyone in a reliably low rock auto dotcom always offers the lowest prices possible rather than changing prices based on what the market will bear like airlines do.

They don't do that. Rock auto Dotcom's for everyone does not require membership or account. We love rock, auto, rock, auto. Dotcom is a family business. Serving auto parts customers online for 20 years go to rack auto dotcom to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers. They have everything from engine control modules, the brake parts, the tail lamps, motor oil, even new carpet. Whether it's for your classic or your daily driver, get everything you need in a few easy clicks delivered directly to your door.

The rock auto dotcom catalog is unique and remarkably easy to navigate quickly. See all the parts available for your vehicle and choose the brand specifications and prices you prefer. Best of all, prices at rock, auto, dotcom are always reliably low and the same for professionals and do it yourselfers. Why spend up to twice as much for the same parts? Go to rock auto dotcom right now, see all the parts available for your car truck, right? Bongino my last name.

Buongiorno. In there. How did you hear about us? So they know we sent you over there. It's important, right? Bongino again in there. How did you hear about us? Box They have an amazing selection. Don't waste money and get the best parts, the best prices, reliably low prices for everyone. All the parts your car will ever need. You've heard the jingle, all parts your car will never need rock Rakhat over. They didn't tell me this thing.

They just love the jingle. Rock art of dotcom rock, auto, dotcom. Joe's personal favorite.

Oh, you were a big shopper there. I work for a big show.

Hopefully one day of the year I make up, but maybe when he needs it, he goes to narcotics and stuff. All right, let's get back to the show. Appreciate Rock Auto being here. So again, Facebook strikes again. Ladies and gentlemen, this is serious. I hate to make these segments about me because it's my show. You hear enough for me during the show about me because it's my show. But this is important because there's an election going on in Georgia and an important one.

Right now. So it's critical that we call this stuff out for what it is. So yesterday I'm sitting there in a been the dreaded chemo chair, right. It's long, you're there for like four hours after four bags at the last one takes two hours. The Dakar Bazine, you have four drugs in a BVDs chemo, you have Adriamycin myosin, if I forget the van and Dr. Ducted Car Bazine or something. But the adriamycin from the beginning is red.

So you look up online chemo, the red devil, they call it the red devil. That one hit me like a ton of bricks yesterday. The red devil, Diablo Rojo, like Hilaria Baldwin would say Diablo Rojo. I mean, when you go to the bathroom and you you can see it's the red devil, you're like man, maybe the pink devil, but that stuff. So I'm sitting there and, you know, hit me hard. So I wasn't the best the mood yesterday because usually when you're getting the feel, you feel it hours yesterday, maybe it was the fourth one is no good.

No, no bueno.

If Hillary Obama was talking and I see on my Facebook page, your Facebook page has been fact checked or we had to put a note on one of your posts because it's missing context. I'm mean, here we go again with fake book, fake book strikes again. So what happened? Let me walk you through this to show you what they do and how Facebook pages like mine, which are very popular, they're popular despite Facebook. Because liberal people say, what does Dan Bongino Kapranos pages number one or number two in a country on any given day based on crowd tangle?

It's because you share it on Facebook doing anything for us. They reject most of our ads. It's popular because if you you click share, that's all that's the only reason it's got to do with liberals conspiracy theories. So in order for Facebook to get in the way of my popularity MySpace, you have to invent ways to stop you from sharing my stuff on Facebook. So this is what they do, they put little notes on my post to make it seem like my page is incredible what happened?

Let's walk through it piece by piece first. Here's the clip. It's a little bit long, but it's worth replaying. I did a on this show. We post video clips of my show on Facebook, if you ever want to see. And we do like three or four short segments a day. This one went viral. It was a clip of me and Joe going back and forth about statements made by Democrat Senate candidate in Georgia, Rafael Warnock, who's a pastor, says he says things that are not pastor like all the time, calling out America's love affair with whiteness, which by its very nature is a racist statement.

Shockingly fake book sick there fact checkers on us and said that was missing context, ladies and gentlemen. Watch the clip. I did. We quote the guy. It's his own video. Joe didn't edit this. It's his own video. Check this out. Oh, did he say that this is your Senate candidate, Georgy. I don't give a damn if you're black, Hispanic, Asian, Muslim, Jewish, Christian. Buddhist, Hindu, I don't care what your religion, where you were born.

How is that not a racist statement that we're somehow in love with when we're putting people in witness boxes now? So this is Mr. Warnock running for Senate in Georgia in a runoff happening January 5th, which we must win, because if we lose those two Senate races in Georgia in this January 5th of this year runoff and you don't turn out, expect your taxes to go up, your kids will be kicked out of charter schools. Speech suppression will be double that, triple that.

I'll just be terrific. Get the joke, Joe. Here's the big I got you just got that one right away, I just want that on the record.

Here is the video of Mr. Wornout, how if you can tell me how this is not a racist statement, I'd love to hear it. Send me a message on parler. I would love to hear how this is not a racist statement. Check this out.

I don't no matter what happens next month, more than a third of the nation that would go along with this is reason to be afraid. America needs to repent for its version of whiteness on full display. The three say that. Now back to me live me like tell me I have a different shirt on, so those watching on Rumball, it'll be Reppert, our great friends, great charity, Folds of Honor. Awesome. Love them. That was the segment we had to cut it a little bit short, Joe and I went on to banter a little bit, but, you know, I am I play the whole thing three plus minutes long.

So Raphael Warnock. Joe played it, we did not edit it, we cut it for time, which, by the way, ladies and gentlemen, is done in every single news and opinion program on planet Earth. Joe, you were in radio, what, 30 years, maybe more, when you were doing radio and you're playing a snippet of a presidential speech by George Bush, Obama trumpet.

You play the entire speech on the radio program, just checking if there's dead air there. And why waste the space age? Just clip it out. Now, you just play a clip right now. So if we have a clip saying, like Obama said, like, you know, if you like your plan, you can keep your plan, like you play the clip because that part's interesting. But you don't play the three hours of his speeches checking right now.

No. OK, think Joe has been in the business longer than me. Maybe I'm missing something. So we did not play the entire WARNOCK'S speech. We played the portion of the speech in his own words that was controversial. Now, you may may say, well, what were they what context was missing? Let's be clear what he was talking about there, he said in the beginning of that clip, if you rewind it. He said a month from now, he's talking about the election that speech was given in or sermon was given October of twenty sixteen.

Before the election of Donald Trump. And he's talking about America's love affair with whiteness and how we need to renounce this. Here is the actual note I got on my because I'm on the business side of my Facebook and you'll see when you go to this post on Facebook, when was it, Paula? December 14th, December 14th, I think was the initial. And we, by the way, just so you know, like in case you think I ever fake the funk, which I don't you know, I walk the walk folks every time, every time I do it.

In case you think I'm scared of Facebook Benami, I don't care at all. I'm telling you not to show off, not to be Mr. Tough Guy. We make a lot of money on Facebook. I don't care a lot like life changing money. Don't care. Now, that's easy for me to say. But in a big double barreled index finger to Facebook, I called my Facebook buddy who helps me get the stuff up because we have producers and said we'll put the video up.

And I said, do me a favor in case you think I'm making this up. Look, the original post was December 14th when I put that video up. I said then, this is what the Clippers, I said, repost that same exact clip today. And that's what we did, making fun of Facebook on Facebook, ban us, we don't care. I love Parler. I'm not kidding. This is not about the money. If it was, I wouldn't do it.

But I care. Let's apologize. No, not doing that. Those are his words. Here's what appeared on my business side of the account, which you didn't get to say. You're just going to see a missing context when you go to the December 14 post said a post shared by your page is missing context. Independent fact checkers. USA Today say that information and a post shared by me, Dan Bongino, is missing context and could mislead people, we have added a notice to the post and that it gives you a link to the USA Today fact check.

What is a fact check? Say I'll show you this in a minute. There are Reverend Warnock. Sermon on Whiteness Condemns Racism.

So to be clear, telling Americans or implying three years, Serban, Serban, the past or so, of course, anything he says, this has to be stated as gold. Implying through your sermon that whiteness is bad skin color and has to be renounced. Is condemning racism. I'm sorry, we have to do this again, face I.D. There you go, kick right in there. So read today from the chemo. I was like, you look a little funny.

I know. Let's go to the then left's favorite dictionary, Dotcom. And let's put in racism here and see what it says, because we may be off on the left. Loves a dictionary. The dictionary that comes probably change the definition of racism, a belief or doctrine that inherent differences, inherent meaning. You were born with them like your skin color, just checking. That's inherent differences. You inherited, inherited them. White whiteness would be right when you can't change your rate, like inject yourself that much.

Yeah, well, Paul is right. Unless you're Laria a dictionary. Matt Polumbo, our budget Bungeni report. I also suggested that to that after the Alario Baldwin scandal dictionary dot com will change the definition of Spanish, meaning not of Hispanic origin, but marrying a famous guy and suggesting your Spanish dictionary dot com. But here's a belief reduction that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others, that a particular racial group is inferior to others, condemning whiteness as a curse and inherent genetic characteristic that fits that definition perfectly.

But somehow the fact checkers dreaded air quotes at USA Today have totally flip the script. The suggested war. Not saying that is condemning racism. You're like, I must be living in the George Costanza Seinfeld episode, where he does everything backwards and his life seems to work out better because he's been a failure up to that point. Curses at his boss. He gets a promotion. Remember that episode? One of my faves works for George Steinbrenner Curses Man Gets a promotion with the Yankees.

You must think we're living in bizarro Superman where everything's upside down. We are. We are living in a society with a deconstruction of society in the weaponization of language, please watch yesterday's show about that part, too. That was important. I did a long segment on it, but it was worth your time. How the weaponization of language is a political weapon are going to have us all in a fractionalized society where the meaning of words mean entirely different direly different things.

How does a society function like that, how do you walk in a supermarket and say, I'd like a bushel of apples and he gives you oranges? I know a dictionary that said these are apples and other oranges. That's not true. Liberals said apples are racist. So I'm giving you apples. But you said apples are racist, but apples are redefined as oranges because orange aren't racist. What the hell are you talking about? This is how societies disintegrate.

This is the Tower of Babel phenomenon in live time. Here's the actual article from this absolute joke, please, whoever Matthew Brown is, the guy, please give up on the whole IT journalism. It's not for you. This is the most of all the dumb fact checks. This is by far this is right before an election January 5th. By the way, tell me how this is isn't and in kind donation from fake book in USA Today to Rafael Warnock, the Democrats, please.

I'd love to hear it. I'll wait. How is this not an income and how how it in condonation we quoted the guy. Here from the USA Today Facebook piece that they put it, you're going to have to read this if you go to my December 14 Peace Now, which now you should share everywhere. And the new one, don't do it for me because it'll probably get me banned from Facebook. Do it for everyone. I don't care.

Fact check, this is said by Matthew Brown, a legit journalist, Reverend Warnock, Sermon on Whiteness Condemns Racism does not call for antiwhite bigotry. Did I say that in my thing that he called for anti white bigotry? Did I say that anywhere near I said the statement he made about renouncing whiteness was inherently racist? That I say anyway, he called for anti white bigotry. Notice how he does that, he totally flips the script. Let's look at how we did it, because it's kind of hilarious.

Sorry, I know I went out of water. Can we get back to who he was in a second that you want to show you who he was at the end? They probably brought it out of order. Here's from the USA. This is how they how unbelievably they try to finagle their way out of condemning whiteness, being somehow condemning racism, quote. Matthew Brown, fake journalist, USA Today. Let me call him a legit journalist, just to be fair, because he alleges he's a journalist.

It's not fake because he thinks he's a journalist. I'm going to say alleged because this is not journalism. He says whiteness define the concept of, quote, whiteness is an academic term that can be defined as the way that white people, their customs, culture and beliefs operate as a standard by which all other groups are compared. This is according to the National Museum of African-American History and Culture. This definition is beyond race. I'll get to that in a second.

It's not meant to be a structural attack on white people. It's a joke. It's not a structural attack on white people. Renounce whiteness, but don't worry white people. This is not an attack. That's according to the ever brilliant and I believe me, I mean that sarcastically. Andrea Gillespie, a political scientist and director at the James Rosen Johnson Institute for Race and Difference at Emory University, apparently missed. Gillespie had another brilliant comment here.

By brilliant I mean, not brilliant dictionary dot com definition, but he is trying to offer a very pointed critique of a white supremacist culture. He said, you cut that out, Joe. Why did you cut that out of the war, not clip I about the white supremacist? Because that's not what he said in that sense. So he says, no, we're not trying to offer a pointed critique of white supremacist culture, which everybody renounces. No, there's nobody that privileges.

Whiteness, above all, are the types of people. She said, no, no, we're not going to say that I'm condemning whites. So is everyone else. That's not what Warnock said. He said we need to announce, renounce whiteness. She goes on to say, this genius, the term whiteness, this is now Matthew Brown, again, a legit journalist, has been in use for decades and is often connected with notions of white privilege and systemic racism.

Did you read the opening National Museum of African-American History, definition of Whiteness? Are you picking out a few things in their. That are so grotesquely racist that only a moron wouldn't see it. But that defines most people immediate, Joe, just to be clear. Joe, you're you're Scottish, right? You're some Scottish Armacost. I'm Scottish. Erm, Scottish, yep. My children are half, I guess, white by definition. My wife is 100 percent Colombian.

I'm Italian or Italian in order German, Irish, French and from the United Kingdom a little bit more.

Jo White people that the definition of whiteness is they're defined by their customs. They're they're they're yeah. Who's who's their. Are we talking about the Italians because last time I checked. Now, listen, I don't know how far back your ancestors go to Scotland with spaghetti and meatballs, overcatch bread over there.

Just.

No, no, no, that was not racist. But that's that's their cost. Their their customs. Their white people. That's their customs.

Haggis. No. I mean, did I grow up like my Irish friends eating shepherd's pie? I didn't even know what it was till I was like 20. What about your Blitzer, my grandfather's name was was Kramer something get more German than that? I never had a problem in my life. I love it. I think because I like that kind of stuff, the better the process. I never had one even know how to cook a damn shame on me.

Everybody grew up in my house and my grandma stop drinking that Italian liquor, I don't even know what it is because I grew up in American culture today, whatever. How racist is it to say whiteness is defined by their customs and cultures? What the hell does that mean? Italian culture is nothing like German culture, which is nothing like Irish culture, which is nothing like Scottish culture, which is nothing like Croatian culture or Yugoslavian culture or anything else.

What are you idiots talking about? That whiteness isn't racist to renounce because we're only talking about there they are custom don't exist. As the great Jordan Peterson once said. And I'm summarizing. His brilliance here. Has there been any tool ever used in the history of humankind more dangerous and deadly for the murder of millions than judging individuals? By a collective groups of a group of characteristics they can't control. Judging an individual person by the language he speaks. The color of her skin.

The place he was born. Is there anything more dangerous and deadly? Then telling people they need to renounce whiteness. A characteristic which has nothing to do with their character at all. That they were born with and they have absolutely zero control over. Unlike as Miss Paula said, Ilaria Baldwin, who can switch on a diet, she has a she has a switch there and we missed out on that. Is there anything more dangerous in that? It's been the excuse for the Soviets, the.

Put the sex in the gulags, the Chinese, to put the wiggers in death camps even here. Put the Japanese and internment camps during World War Two, it's happened here enslave millions of African blacks who were brought here as slaves, make them sit at segregated counters. Does anybody question the evils of any of those? Exterminate. Via gas, millions of Jews in the Holocaust because of their religion. Anybody, anybody, anybody defending that? If you are, please tune out immediately and never unsubscribe from my show tomorrow.

You're not that's not my audience. And yet we're not supposed to condemn Warnock. Condemning and asking people to renounce an immutable inherent characteristic they have no control over, regardless of the character of the person, we're not supposed to condemn that because. Matthew, can you put up Matthew Brown? You know, I got a second screenshot. I'm sorry to go out of order, but this is Matthew Brown, the genius who has somehow turned an inherently racist statement into a statement condemning racism.

Here's Matthew Brown, politics now reporter. And I'm putting the reporter in air quotes, Matthew Brown, as the politics now a reporter at USA Today, originally from Georgia Matthews, a graduate of Dartmouth College. Oh, Matthew, so much smarter than all of us apparently can't even read the dictionary. Dotcom left this dictionary that I can't even read their own dictionary definition of racism. That's Matthew Brown for. I mean, he personally as Matthew Brown, I never met this guy, but I'm telling you, based on Matthew Brown's own writing, that Matthew Brown is an idiot.

And I'll tell you what, I think I'm going to share that Facebook post now again today, call up my guy later for a third time. Facebook wants to ban us, you go right ahead. I'll make a bigger deal out of this than you know. And I know Facebook. I know what they're thinking. I had a guy. I didn't you just I won't say his name, but he's an employee of Facebook. I'm pretty sure he's telling the truth based on the inside information.

He sent me an email. It's that Facebook doesn't careful conservatives believe they're growing around the world and I'm not your buddy. And I used to listen to my show I like to email was very informative. He was giving me all kinds of data and numbers and stuff. You sure about that? Number one, I have about a million listeners to a show, all platforms included, sometimes more. If even 10 percent of those left. And 10 percent of influencers on Facebook, like Mark Levin and others who's already leaving and others left to.

And then you have a bunch of kids right now, the generation that hates Facebook or you think they Google it, young people are leaving without Google. So we say that by instinct, by force, leave that search engine. Any other go to ducktail, go put in young people leaving Facebook. You think I'm making it up, you think Facebook doesn't have a problem on its hands? Yeah, kids aren't even on it. They think it's a joke.

You sure Facebook you want and the reason I mentioned the money thing is not to say, hey, look at me this time, it's the money things. You're going to lose a million dollar account. Because you decided to give a ridiculous election donation to a Democrat from a legit journalist who doesn't even understand the definition of racism, you sure you want to go down that path? I will fight that to the end. Let me show you one more quote from this ridiculous fact check contacted me, whatever the hell it was from the USA Today piece, USA Today went sometimes, by the way, accidentally does real journalism.

I have a story to get you today. It's important, but this is also this woman, Gillispie, who's a real genius on this stuff. And I use that term lightly. She is what I suspect. Reverend Warnock, what did she suspects, Joe? So keep in mind, this is we keep this up because it's important. I have to say that sometimes as Paula gets shot, the trigger finger there. So when Joe and I comment and Paula on what we suspect, Warnock said.

Based on a common sense definition of racism, Joe, that's no good, but what Miss Gillespie says is what really matters because she knows more about Reverend Warnock, apparently, than we do quote Gillespie, Andrea Gillespie. But I suspect Reverend Warnock was trying to speak is to how Donald Trump as a candidate appeal to whiteness. He did. Joe, do you recall that Judge Donald Trump's speech? I appeal to whiteness for you. I don't recall that.

Of course, you just making that up the threat of status, loss and body by having a woman run against him in an increasingly diverse society. Interesting, because Donald Trump never said that. So keep in mind, there is no fact check in the fact check. There should be a line there. Fact check. Donald Trump did not say this, but there's none because it's USA Today and alleged journalist Matthew Brown. It goes on regardless of the utility of whiteness as a concept that does not refer to specific people who may identify or be seen as white.

Warnock's comments were not advocating antiwhite bias. Ladies and gentlemen. What the hell does that even mean? He's telling you to renounce as a country whiteness while this dope at USA Today is saying that's not condemning white people, then what is it condemning white aliens? What else is it condemning the color white and a Crayola box? Do you realize how stupid you have to be, this kid, Dartmouth, rescind this guy's degree? Could he not read? Imagine reverse this, because liberals can't think straight, because when everything is about Donald Trump, liberals go blank because they're dumb.

Can you imagine for a moment, Joe? At a Jim Crow counter with a sign up. Here's the colored water fountain, here's the colored counter suggesting this is not an attack on people who are black with elevated melanin levels in their skin because it's just an attack on colored people and colored people. And, of course, doesn't mean that. You would be. Thank the Lord thrown out of polite society tomorrow. Because everyone would look at you like, what are you, an idiot?

But when the terms are flipped and it's about whiteness, it's OK, it's an attack on white people, it's just an attack on people who are white, who have whiteness or. This is Matthew Brown, Fatma's College. Isabel pulled Dartmouth right away off your college application. My daughter's at home, the school is me right away. I told her I applied all these don't don't apply their. Serious start Miss Out Paula Dartmouth off the list, I thought is very smart off the list.

All right, moving on, I got some other stuff to cover, so show me go on this a little bit longer. Sorry, but one rest in peace. Congressman elect Luke Ledlow. I don't know if you heard this story, but he was just elected to Congress. What a horrible story. 41 years old. Just that really awful story came down with covid apparently was getting a little better, broke bad inflammation kicked in, was sent to intensive care, believe he's from Louisiana.

So rest peacefully with the Lord. My prayers sincerely. Me and my family, too, are with your family. God rest your soul 41. Goes to show you this virus is very unpredictable and let me just say not to make this a negative downer segment, but. To the liberals and leftists who are going after this guy because he objected to Lockdown's trying to save business. May God save you one day, I'm sorry, I'm just going to leave that I'm not kidding.

I'm not using the Lord's name. May God save you and your wretched souls one day. Politicizing a man's death at 41 with two kids and a wife. Just disgusting. Moving on, because that's going to get ugly and I don't want it to. All right, let's lighten it up a little bit. I got more on Georgia and some other stuff. I'm going have to get through some of this pretty quick, but. On a lighter note, I have to do an update on this Valaria Baldwin story, and not because I want to pile on, I don't do pylons, you know, I don't do these.

But it's just becoming epidemic now where people. Are faking. Who they are and doing it in a in a way that is so easily discoverable, you start to wonder if these are sane, rational people. Elizabeth Warren pretending to be an Indian, Rachel Dolezal pretending to be black. Jessica Kruger. I don't know what she was pretending to be Spanish or something. These examples are just everywhere. And you wonder why. Well, as I said yesterday, please, again, listen to yesterday's show.

We put a lot of work into it. I talk about how it's faking your status to become a minority when you're not. Gives you status because in victim culture, if you're a minority, you have victim status and that's exalted by lefties. But secondly, it immunizes you from attacks because leftists believe you can't be a racist or say racist things like Rafael Warnock did if you are black or Hispanic because you don't have power. The guy is running for Senate.

So that's nonsense, too. So what better way, I mean, as I said yesterday, I'm actually stunned more people don't fake being Spanish, black, Asian or whatever. Insulated from attacks and you get status in society with this, who's better than you? Let's just replay the Solaria Baldwin Ilaria Baldwin video here. Here is Larry Baldwin, who his real name is Hillary Wedgwood Thomas from Cambridge, Massachusetts, who admits now she is a, quote, white girl, her words, not mine.

And, you know, why would she not want to be a white girl? Listen to Rafael Warnock. You know who she probably, you know, likes suggesting to her that whiteness should be renounced. Why would you not want to pretend to be something else? But here's Hilaria Baldwin on a cooking segment on a major national show, pretending to not know how to say in the word English. Keep in mind, she grew up in Cambridge, Massachusetts, speaking English.

How to say the word not supercalifragilistic makes me, although she apparently forgot how to say the word because he pretend to be a Spanish speaking cucumber. You know, very tough words talking. Nobody knows what a cucumber cucumber. You know, I talk about some scientific term here. We're not talking about pediatric, autoimmune, neurodegenerative orders associated with strep. That's a real thing, by the way, pandas. Check this out. Here's Paul. Had to correct me.

It's not Hilaria Baldwin. It's how do how do you live with the Eli? Paul is actually a native Spanish Ilari silent inaudible. Check this out, you ingredients, man.

Tomatoes. We have a cucumber, cucumbers. We have.

How are you? How you say you. How you say. I explained why she said it that way yesterday on the show. Thank you, audience archivist Judy, for your great email about that. She speaks to James. That is really, really nasty to do. When people learn another language, they translate directly. And if you're asking someone in the Spanish language how to say something in English, you say Como say this? So she's translating it directly.

Como say this is literally how you say. Of course, she knows in English that's not how you say how you say, you say, how do you say. But she's basically making fun of Spanish speakers by doing that, pretending to be Spanish. Joe, get a pass. By the way, how you say busted an English busted, is there a bust is how you say how you say busted, busted? Is there a busted in Spanish?

Here's the latest update in the L.A. area, Baldwin scandal, which ties right into this morning. It's all about the same thing. Why would she not want to pretend she wasn't white? We're not told her whiteness should be reannounced. Why not, in fairness, Hilaria Baldwin beat him to the punch, was doing this way before his speech. Here's The Daily Mail. This will be in the show notes today, Bungeni, that communist newsletter. Another update in the Claudia Baldwin scandal.

We always left the Daily Mail headlines, you never need to screenshot the headlines like the longest. It says the whole piece. Don't even bother to read the headline exclusive inside Laria and Alec Baldwin's New York City wedding, where instead of yes to their vows, they said, see, they were. They waved Joe flamenco fans and exchanged Khadir rings inscribed in Spanish.

Before she told Vanity Fair that her family, this is Gloria said, her family, they're all white from Massachusetts. She said her family, she told Vanity Fair, couldn't pronounce certain. She's. It couldn't pronounce. The the woman's father and mother, I think doctors and these are something from Cambridge, Massachusetts, she went to a sixty four thousand dollar a year elite private school in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and her mother and father can't pronounce Baldwin. His last name wasn't like.

Bongani, no, no, no, no, like my name gets pronounced every day fairly enough by people who speak English. Because they say it directly, Bongino, it's not Bongino, it's by Bongino, the Italians pronounce their GS like just don't ask me why. I don't know, they just do it. Bajou or whatever. I don't know if that's French. Of course. Bongiorno in Italian. I don't know. I'm not a linguist. I'm not like the character in Star Trek.

She's a linguist here in Lima. But I've seen no, that's not me. I'm just saying her doctor, dad and mom with advanced level intellects who are white from Cambridge, Massachusetts, I'm reasonably confident could pronounce Baldwin. If her mom and dad were Spanish, they're not I'm also pretty sure they can pronounce Baldwin. How else would you pronounce it? Baldwin, Baldwin, is there an accent, the missing bold woo in Baldwin Road? Rovi Baldwin.

Am I missing something? How do you pronounce Baldwin any other way? What kind of stupid what kind of idiots do you think people are? What kind of. Can I ask you this? Is this not an insult to people who have learned the English language from any foreign country that they can't pronounce? Baldwin. What why am I missing something? My mother in law is no problem. She's an actual native Spanish speaker who learned English. She calls me Danny Bunshiro, not Danny Taino, Danny Bungay, or she's very simply Hasbi.

It's not hard. Even English speakers score my name. Oh. What universe are we living in? All right, two more quick ones on a lighter note, before I get back to George, I'm going to leave you on a sea are usually on a lever. On a lighter note today, I got to leave you on a serious note. But just quickly, what the hell is it? Had to be capable ball. I pulled this off a social media.

What the heck is Chuck Schumer saying yesterday on the House floor about the NDAA and the stimulus vote? This is about twenty nine seconds. If you can translate this in the English language, the actual English language, not Hilaria Baldwin English, I'd be happy to hear what does this guy say? Check this out.

We're about to get the answers to these questions. So now, Mr. Saddam. Madam President, I ask consent to set the NDA a note. Sorry, Madam President, where am I? But the senator modify his request to include a unanimous consent request that the Senate to include unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration. What what are you talking about? Can these guys ever not read off a paper and just say what they think? Oh, I saw that I'm like typical, seriously.

All right, I know I said I get to the negative interest rate story, I got that. And I've got a really, really cool set of I don't do a lot of national security stories on here. I should, but I don't. Tomorrow, I will get to this negative interest rate story and the digital currency in China, it's important. Ladies and gentlemen, they want that here fully digital currency, meaning no cash, majorly bad idea.

I'm talking about Fiacre, not Bitcoin. I love Bitcoin. Great idea. Talking about a government sponsored digital currency, I cannot tell you enough how bad of an idea this is. I'm going to give you a horror story from The Wall Street Journal. What's happening in China? I'm just looking at page two here. Plus it to me. I can't forget. Maybe so this is important. Don't forget this policy, huge and too critical national security stories for tomorrow.

One about this new weapon the Air Force invented. If you want to check out the stories on Bongino Report.com, it'll be in our show notes today, too, and also what happened in Nashville, that should be a big wake up call, but I got to cover that tomorrow to take some time. And I don't want to, you know, leave you hanging on that leave out important details. But I do have to get to this story because it's critical, especially with the election going on.

That's why I'm picking this rather than the other two right now. So I get it. You know, you don't miss Mimi Sangamon Politico story. Check out this headline. Why am I putting up a political story and I'm not putting this in the show notes because I'm not giving them the clicks because the headline is ridiculous. It's a political story about an abomination of a ruling in Georgia about the election that is so laughable that if the Politico headline was honest, you would you wouldn't even have to read the article would be like Daily Mail.

You'd be done. Look at a headline. So Politico. So Politico. We have an issue here with the political scare, you don't have to go out on a limb. All right. Is me. Some politicos, you move me over a little bit to the left. I can see the political there.

And we let my wife come on. We get a mess, right? Don't cut that out. Sometimes they say cut it out. It's not her fault. I go out of order. It's my fault. I'll order for the show and I screw everything up. This is this headline. Judge Blocks Voter Purge, Voter Purge in two Georgia County Judge Leslie Abrams. Gardner, the sister of Stacey Abrams in Georgia, rejected a call for her to recuse.

Judge blocks a voter purge effort, read that story by Politico. You'd be like, oh my gosh, those dastardly Republicans are trying to take legitimate voters off the ballot. Again, Joob and voter suppression everywhere.

What's the real story? Well, let's look at how they frame it inside the Politico piece.

I'm a little worried that it's, quote, Politico. Listen to how they frame this, this suit brought by majority forward, represented by the National Democratic Party attorney Marc Elias, Marc Elias, the same guy who hired Fusion GPS, you know, the whole Spygate thing. That's where Joe Wright followed an effort to challenge the lengthy roster of voters. Simply listen to this, how they frame this simply because their registrations appear to match postal service change of address records.

Simply you moved. It goes on voting officials in the two counties agreed to remove the voter ID shocker. Joe, they moved despite warnings from Democrats that such postal data this is hilarious is not a reliable or conclusive indicator that a voter is giving up their local residents. After Gardner's ruling alliance, the Fusion GPS guy hailed the decision as a blow to GOP voter suppression. So just to be clear. You go to the post office because you're moving. You sign a voter change of a change of address form to have your mail forwarded.

Meaning you don't live there anymore. Those people then should be removed, and by the way, you can still file a provisional ballot because sometimes it does happen again. I'll give you both sides. Unlike the media, political will never explain to you. You can still file a provisional ballot sometimes, Joe. I got friends, they sell homes, then they moved down the block, they changed their mind, they don't want to leave some cell, they don't want to sell anymore.

Happens all the time. You can file a provisional ballot on dispute's, to be crystal clear, there's no voter suppression. But probably ninety five percent plus, and I'm probably being generous of people who file a post office, change of address to move are doing it, get ready for Joe because they moved. Why take your nitroglycerin pills? I know that's stunning, I don't want an unnecessary rise in blood pressure, but that's probably a good reason to ask that their voter rolls be scrubbed of people who can't vote in the state.

Factoid number one, which they casually gloss over their. The case was heard by Stacey Abrams, you know, the self-appointed governor of Georgia, who's not the governor of Georgia, she was the Democrat candidate who was on the news every day talking about how evil the GOP is and trying to suppress votes. The case was heard by your sister. You think that might be grounds for a recusal? I don't know. Only in a sane universe. By the way, that was a GOP judge who was the brother of Donald Trump, who in this case, of course, these hacks and lunatics in the liberal media would lose their minds.

But these aren't principled people. They're losers. That's why they're journalists. Didn't recuse herself. Case was brought by Marc Elias and his group, you know, Marc Elias, the Fusion GPS guy. And Stacey Abrams sister, whose sister is literally on TV lying about GOP voter suppression rules on the case, and they rule, yes, Marc Elias is right that people saying they're moving is not a reliable indicator of people saying they're moving. Matt, if you're watching my show today, Matt runs Mancino report, which is our Trag alternative, thank you for the explosive growth in the the way.

Can you please make that a headline? Judge Rules People saying they're moving is not evidence of people saying they're moving. Can you please put that on there? If you're listening to the show today, maybe we should headline that. Unbelievable. OK, so, you know, I love my daughter, Amelia, she's asked me for a favor. I hope you'll indulge me for a second. And this may be I am not a good singer, folks.

I was in a choir once at St Pancras, which has a world renowned choir, but she wrote she's eight and she wrote a song and unfortunately, she didn't give me the chords. I'm not going to sing the whole thing. Maybe producer Joe would be better to record a jingle here. He is an actual musician, but she asked me. She's never asked me for a favor. She wanted me to sing her song so out of love for my daughter to do that.

So here it goes. It's called my favorite things. I'll just read the first opening couple sentences here. Sing them. I love my father. I love my home. I love my puppy. Oh, whoa, whoa. That's actually in there. Oh, I didn't I'm not reading it right. There's more there are a lot more things that I like, if you want to hear them. She spelled wrong that they are art books and school.

What then is I don't know, you did not say maybe because it's my show, you did not make it. There is some more friends and food colors and candy. There are so many things that I like. I also like singing, those are my favorite things. The Obama seat is very I just said Obama seat as that racist Obama seat, this very upset here can be said, I'm declaring myself Spanish. Obviously she's saying she's very upset.

You did not make it. Maybe because it's my show. You don't have to write a new song from the. I can't say any more. So thank you. I'm sorry I had this subjected to that, but I did promise my daughter they deal with a lot for the show had been home all week, so I promised that and I wanted to play it for. Hey, thanks again for tuning in. We covered a lot of shit. Don't miss tomorrow's show again.

Those two stories about digital currency, those national security stories are really, really worth your time. But I don't want to cut you short. A couple of things.

Please, please, please. We're asking you as a favor, if you wouldn't mind, check out Bongino Report.com, it's separate from Biden's China.com that's we read her opinion piece by Gino Report.com is your new conservative alternative to the Drudge Report. Drudge abandoned us a long time ago. I just got tired of it. We the best conservative news of the day. Matt does a great job. Please make it your new home in the morning for conservative news. And I promise you, we don't like we rarely even put our own articles up there.

It's not about us. It's about the news. I have another website for that Mancino that come. Mancino report that come if you make it your home page in the morning, I mean a lot to me really trying to grow it when we've been up for about a year now and it's moving fast.

And finally, subscribe to the video show Rumball Dotcom Slash Bongino. It's up there. It's free video show price. So you can even see my daughter song up there exclusive. And that's why. Well, wait it out by the thing. I have a write in a Sharpie next time. Thanks for tuning in, folks. I appreciate your patience with everything going on in my life. I felt good today. I promise you. I'll see you all.

You just heard Dan Bongino.