Your home is likely your most valuable asset, but how often do you monitor the title identity thieves could take out a loan and lean against your home and jeopardize your home equity, all without your knowledge. That's why Norton 360 with LifeLock Ultimate Plus not only includes device security, identity theft protection and a VPN for online privacy, but also helps you protect your home title with the home title monitoring feature. It monitors the county recorder's records and notifies you of changes related to your home's title or detect it so you can take necessary action if needed.

Now no one can prevent all cybercrime and identity theft. But Norton 360 with LifeLock is your trusted ally in today's digital world. Sign up for a Norton 360 with LifeLock Ultimate Plus membership today and save 25 percent or more off your first year by going to Norton. Com Matto That's Norton coms matto to save 25 percent off the Rachel Maddow Show weeknights at nine Eastern on MSNBC.

Happy to have you here. You know, it was just over two months ago that former Vice President Joe Biden announced that his running mate, his choice to fill the job that he himself held under President Obama would be California Senator Kamala Harris in the nine weeks since that announcement. It feels like the world has gone around the sun several times. Biden's polling advantage over the president has only grown larger. The president and we now know his wife and his teenage son were both infected with the coronavirus.

The president was hospitalized for coronavirus. The president pulled out of the second presidential debate after a disastrous performance in the first presidential debate. Senator Harris and Vice President Pence held a debate in which a persistent housefly that appeared to be trying to nest in Mr. Pence's hair earned more headlines than any one clash between the vice presidential candidates. Also, over the course of these nine weeks, no small thing. At least twelve point seven million Americans, according to NBC News, took time to already cast their ballots for who they want in the White House these nine weeks.

And Senator Kamala Harris was announced as Joe Biden's running mate have been an era unto themselves. In that time, though, while all that has happened, I haven't yet had a chance to speak with Senator Kamala Harris since she has been the Democratic Party's vice presidential nominee until tonight. Senator Harris will be joining us live tonight for the first time as the vice presidential nominee of her party. She's joining us live tonight from Washington, D.C.. Senator, it's such an honor to have you here tonight.

I know you have a choice to be anywhere you want to be. Thanks for being here. Thank you, Rachel. It's great to be back with you. Thank you.

I want to jump right in with some news that we just learned today. Today, the first lady announced in a written statement that her and the president's teenage son, Barron, also tested positive for covid in the wake of her in the president's own diagnosis. Barron, according to the first lady, has thankfully recovered since tested negative. It's it's such a dramatic piece of news to learn. And, of course, we're all grateful about his recovery. But I just have to ask your reaction to the fact that the White House itself really does appear to be a significantly sized covid cluster of its own, including infecting the whole first family now.

Well, I wish the best for for the first lady, for her son and for the president. I know too many people, I think we all do who have contracted the virus. Horrible stories of people who have lost family members. And I don't wish it on anybody. The suffering that people are experiencing is really quite significant. But I will say that, you know, it's what I've been saying, Rachel. The president and this administration have been the greatest failure of any presidential administration in the history of our country.

You just go back to what they knew and when they knew it. And let's start with January twenty eighth, when the president, the vice president, were informed that this thing was deadly, that it could hurt children, that it was five times more deadly than the flu, that it was airborne, and they covered up that information they didn't share with the American people.

And, you know, when I look at the over, I think it's seven and a half million people that have contracted the virus with, as we now know, serious, potentially serious lifelong consequences in terms of lung scarring and things of that nature. When we look at the over two hundred and fifteen thousand people that have died in just the last several months and they have families and friends and and they had life to live. And put that in the context of the president's failure to tell the American people what was going on so they can protect themselves and their families, much less so that we could have a president and leadership in our country who had a plan to deal with it.

And now look where we are.

It has been a failure of magnitude that is causing millions and millions of people to suffer because of the public health consequences and because of the economic consequences. And frankly, that is why we need a new president in the White House who will embrace science, who will be guided by fact and truth and speak truth to the American people and have a plan because this administration still has no plan, Rachel. They still no plan. You contrast that with Joe Biden, who's saying we're going to have a national plan for testing and for treatment and for vaccines, which will be free contact tracing.

This is this was avoidable to the extent that the American people have now suffered. They didn't need to suffer like people have been suffering. If there had been leadership guided by science and guided by truth.

If you win and you and Joe Biden would be taking over control of the federal government in late January, the University of Washington's current projection is that we could be close to four hundred thousand Americans dead by that point by the end of January. And I know, as you say, that you and Joe Biden have a plan to tackle covid that is much different than what the current administration has been doing, but particularly because it has been so bad, because of the criticism that you are levying, I think rightly about the president's approach to this, particularly because of what we have recently learned from the White House, that they are approaching this now with this sort of fringe half baked herd immunity idea, which basically means they want as many Americans as possible to get infected and somehow will still protect the elderly and other vulnerable people from dying from it.

Do you do you worry that this might be so bad by the time you take over, if you win in January, that it will almost be too far gone to turn around? I, I despair at how bad this is and how many Americans have died. I am overwhelmed by the prospect about what you are going to be trying to turn around by late January if we stay on the trajectory that we're on now. I mean, let me start by saying that I pray I and that we will have a vaccine as soon as possible and that it will be safe and that we can distribute it to everyone who needs it as quickly as possible.

But you're right, Rachel.

I mean, when we look at the trajectory based on just where we've been in the last weeks, much less months, we know more people are going to die. We know many more people are going to contract this virus. And it doesn't help when there's a president of the United States who is also the commander in chief, who still is playing around with people, playing around with facts, with bravado, taking the stage and suggesting that he is now immune and saying to people who have contracted the virus or those who may that, you know, yet again, he's going back to a theme.

He's he's he's been pushing from the beginning, which is to suggest people shouldn't take this thing seriously. And thank God that we have an election coming up right now because can you imagine if we had to deal with two more years of him? And so we have an election and the American people have a clear contrast. On the one hand, there was Joe Biden, who since March has been saying that the plan that he has had in mind should be implemented.

Joe Biden, who has been modeling the right behavior in terms of wearing a mask. Meanwhile, Donald Trump took the debate stage and and made fun of him. And then later, of course, we know what happened. So I think about where we are now. And I think at the very least, the American people have a have light at the end of the tunnel and there is a plan that they are aware of that can be implemented. And the way that it will be implemented is if over the next 20 days people vote, they vote early.

I invite people to go to Joe Biden, Dotcom go. I will vote Dotcom and make sure that you know where your polling places and if you can vote early, it is within our power to change the trajectory of this.

And and I am fully confident that people will do that.

Senator, one of the things that I have also been troubled by, and even when I consider the prospect that you and Vice President Biden are going to win and have the chance to take the country in a different direction on this, I worry about the long standing impact of what we've already been through, and that's about the CDC during the pandemic.

We have seen a number of episodes where the CDC has changed or withheld its scientific guidance. In response to political pressure from the White House, the CDC director appears to have repeatedly caved to pressure from the White House, which has caused not only damage to the public's confidence in the CDC, it's also caused significant damage to morale among career scientists at the CDC. What is the first thing that you would do to try to start restoring the integrity of the CDC and our ability as a public to trust in what they do?

To trust those career people who are the public health experts, who are the scientists who, you know, there's so many people in the CDC and NIH who have dedicated their lives to working on research and developing those things that will alleviate pain and improve the human condition.

And, you know, personal story. My mother, who I talk about often, she was a scientist, Rachel, a sheep. I grew up going to the lab with her after school and on weekends, and my mother was actually an adviser at NIH. I remember this kid growing up in California. I would hear about this place called Bethesda. I always knew Mommy was going to Bethesda and and I so this is perhaps personal for me, in addition to being professional, which is we must trust the scientists.

These are people who have dedicated their lives to this work. They could care less about who voted for who in the last election. They just want to focus on what is necessary to save lives and and to help people and be relieved of pain. And so the first step is to trust them and to let them know we trust them and to leave them to do their work, leave them to guide our decisions and our policies when it comes to things like a pandemic.

And Joe and I feel strongly about it. Remember, Joe, even after the presidency when he was in as vice president with President Barack Obama started this whole effort he referred to is the moon shot? Right. He cares deeply about science. I've said in briefings with Joe, with world wide experts on these issues. And he is knowledgeable. He is fascinated. He is interested. He is engaged in what science can do and must do to help the American people.

How does it feel to be out there right now yourself campaigning in these circumstances? Obviously, there's never been a presidential campaign logistically like this one, let alone politically.

But do you feel safe campaigning during covid? Well, we've been very safe and, you know, again, the president has made fun of us, but we wear masks, we we social distancing and and so the events are you know, it's it's you know, where I'd like to hug people. You don't have people these days. That's not an option. You can't shake hands. But but you can look people in the eye and you can listen and you can be there.

And so, for example, I'm going to be in North Carolina and Ohio and Pennsylvania and I think Texas over the next three days.

And and that's important. I think it's important to be where the people are. But to do it in a way that does not cause them to be at any risk in terms of their safety. And so we're working it out. It's definitely a different kind of campaign than anything that we've done before. But we're making the best of it. And people are are engaged and they're engaged online. They're know we've done, I don't know, countless Zoom's and I think we're all in our personal and professional lives figuring out ways to stay engaged and connected with with the people that we need to talk with and the people we need to hear from.

One of the other things, of course, that's changed and changed sort of unexpectedly and very late in the game is the debate situation. The next debate between President Trump and Vice President Biden was supposed to be tomorrow. President Trump backed out after it was changed by the debate commission into a remote debate because of his covid diagnosis. Do you and and your campaign expect that there actually will be a final presidential debate next week? Or do you expect that the president is going to back out of that one to.

You know, I mean, he just changes his mind every day, who knows what he's going to say? But Joe's been clear. He's keeping his promise. And early in the summer, they worked out a schedule with the commission and Joe sticking to his word. And so Joe will be keeping the October 15 date. He has never backed out from it. And he'll be talking to the American people and listening from the American people. And he's prepared to do that again on I think it's October 22nd.

So Joe's consistent. Donald Trump is never consistent. And I don't have any reason to believe he will be on this subject. Are you as mad as everybody else is that NBC is doing a town hall with President Trump tomorrow instead of the debate at the same time that Vice President Biden is going to be on ABC?

I'm not touching that is that is. Well, let me let me ask you let me ask you a different angle. Yeah. Yeah. Should the networks refuse to give the president other opportunities for airtime if he's the one who loses the chance to debate?

Know, I'm not going to tell the networks what to do, but I'll tell you, I know who I'm going to be watching. So there you go.

Well, well done. Well done. Your job is safe here.

Let me ask you about some things going on in your home state and mine in California. The California state Republican Party has been caught putting up fake ballot drop boxes, presumably to trick voters into depositing their ballots there. It's almost like a like a like a College Republicans prank, but they're doing it for real. Out in the wild, the state party has been issued a cease and desist order by the state, by the secretary of state and the attorney general.

They say this is a felony. Your former attorney general in California. What do you make of this? Do you think there should be legal ramifications for the party here? I think there are and I think that the both the secretary of State Padia and and the current attorney general Basara, have made clear that they are monitoring it and they're prepared to take action where enforcement is necessary. The point that that I will make and and I think it is an important one 20 days before the election, is that they're in every state.

Many states are obstacles that are purposely being thrown at voters because there are certain people that are afraid that if people vote that they're going to lose.

And for some of us, you know, we just celebrated in the last month or so the passage of the 19th Amendment right honoring those suffragettes who fought for the right for women to vote. Also, remembering black women can vote until nineteen sixty five. But this is not new in America that gutted the Voting Rights Act in twenty thirteen. And we've seen almost that two dozen states set up laws that have been designed to suppress the vote. These tactics are not new.

But what I'm seeing, Rachel, in this election in twenty twenty is the voters will not be deterred and people are voting by mail. They are voting early. You see the lines in places like Texas and Georgia where people are prepared to stand in line. They are doing it with joy and they're doing it with a commitment, knowing that their voice matters and that their voice can determine the outcome of this election through their vote.

To that end and a very, very serious level, I think one of the things that we could see coming from a great distance when President Trump was first elected and we saw the way that he was approaching gaining power, is that I think for a lot of us that was worry very early on that he would become the kind of leader that America previously thought we didn't have or would never have again. After Nixon, who would use the powers of the state, use the powers of government to try to ensure his continued hold on power.

And she used to talk about voters not being deterred here for some key pillars of the government that the president might use to try to subvert the election and stay in power. We are seeing some contingency plans come into view. And I mean, specifically, there's a legal group now that includes former heads of the American Bar Association that is telling Justice Department personnel they will defend and support them if they whistleblower resign or refuse orders on election interference as as prosecutors and Justice Department officials, experts and military law are also offering free counsel to service members who question the legality of Trump's orders regarding using the use of the military against protests or related to the election.

These contingency plans from within the profession, within the legal profession, within the military law expert profession, trying to backstop people who may be asked to do very undemocratic things by a president who has an authoritarian cast when it approaches this election. Have there been those kinds of contingency plan discussions within the campaign? I know that you've said that there will be a peaceful transfer of power and that the best way that we can assure that is for there to be an overwhelming vote against this president.

But are you working on those kind of contingency plans in the case of a worst case scenario? We are, but I also, to your point, I have faith in the American people and in our democracy, and there's no question, Rachael, that many of us believe that Donald Trump has been a threat to our democracy and the integrity of our democratic institutions. I don't think there's any question about that. Not to mention his complicity with foreign actors trying to interfere in our election in twenty twenty, as they did in twenty sixteen.

But I will say this.

Our democracy is always going to be as strong as the American people's willingness to fight for our democracy. And so it is strong.

If you look at what people are doing as we speak, again, standing in line, prepared to engage in litigation, litigation if necessary, but registering people to vote, talking with their friends and neighbors about what's at stake, we and we have always had to fight to to get closer to the ideals that we hold dear. And part of that has been over the course of our history to fight for the integrity of our elections. And what I am seeing every day in this election and I have seen for a long time as the American people are willing to fight for the integrity of our electoral process, in spite of those that might attempt to discredit or tamper with it.

And ultimately, I think we we prevail when we don't let anybody mess with our vote. And we we stand firm in knowing that our vote has meaning and it has purpose and actually can determine an outcome of an election. Senator Harris, we're going to take a quick break here, if you don't mind, I have a lot more to ask you about, including about the confirmation battle over Amy Berita, potential Supreme Court justice, if you'd stick with us.

We'll be right back in just a moment.

OK, Senator Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, is our guest tonight. We'll be right back.

We get support from Madison Reed, it might be hard to get to a salon right now or maybe the expense is holding you back, but I'm about to color my own hair at home, something I never thought I'd do and at a fraction of the cost of going to the salon.

All thanks to Madison Reed.

I've been hearing about Madison Reed for a while now.

My friend Kat told me how happy she was with her results and she even sent me a picture and her hair really does look great. So I went on their website. They walked me through every step of the process to make sure I picked my perfect shade. My kit just arrived and I'm super excited to try it out.

You can get multidimensional color starting at just 22 dollars at Madison, Dasch, Reed, Dotcom, use our code Matto and you'll get 10 percent off plus free shipping on your first color kit. Again, that's code nado at Madison. Dasch, Reed, Dotcom. September is National Life Insurance Awareness Month, but with everything going on right now, a lot of people are wondering if it's possible to buy life insurance at all. That's where policy genius can help.

In minutes, you can work out how much coverage you need and compare quotes from top insurers to find your best price, all at policy genius. Dotcom policy genius works for you, not the insurance company. So if you hit any speed bumps during the application process, they'll take care of everything. They even have policies which allow eligible customers to skip the in-person medical exam and do it over the phone. So if you need life insurance, head to policy genius dotcom right now to get started, you could say 1500 dollars or more a year by comparing quotes on their marketplace policy genius when it comes to insurance.

It's nice to get it right. Do you accept that covid-19 is infectious? I think yes, I do accept that covid-19 is infectious, that that's something of which I feel like, you know, we could say you take judicial notice of. It's an obvious fact. Yes.

Except accept that smoking causes cancer.

I'm not sure exactly where you're going with this.

But, you know, the notice the smoking question is what it is you can answer to people you know, Senator Harris. Yes. Every package of cigarettes warns that smoking causes cancer.

And do you believe that climate change is happening and it's threatening the air we breathe in the water we drink?

Senator, again, I was wondering where you were going with that. You have asked me a series of questions like that are completely uncontroversial, like whether covid-19 is infectious, whether smoking causes cancer and then trying to analogize that to eliciting an opinion on me. That is a very contentious matter. Opinion from me that is on a very contentious matter of public debate. And I will not do that. I will not express a view on a matter of public policy, especially one that is politically controversial, because that's inconsistent with the judicial role, as I have explained.

Thank you. Thank you, Judge Barrett. And you've made your point clear that you believe it's a debatable point.

Back with us once again is Senator Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee for vice president. She, of course, is on the Judiciary Committee. She questioned the president's Supreme Court nominee today.

Senator Harris, thank you again for being with us. Because of what Supreme Court nomination hearings are like now, it is not categorically a surprise that Judge Barrett is refusing to answer questions about how she might rule on cases affecting abortion rights or the Affordable Care Act or climate. But I have to say, it has been surprising to me as a lay observer to see her reluctant to answer questions about black letter law. She has refused to say whether the Constitution allows the president to postpone the election.

It clearly doesn't. Whether voter intimidation is illegal, it clearly is. What is your read on what's going on there?

I Rachel, I think that that she and the Republicans, the Senate, the Republican leaders of the Senate have probably decided that they've got the votes and she doesn't have to answer questions.

You know, I think that it is the fact that she can't she can't admit what Justice Roberts admitted, which is that discrimination, that voter discrimination exists. Justice Roberts could talk about that. Justice Roberts was the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court. Republican appointed, I think, is has created a standard that she should actually admire, which is being candid with the American people about just certain facts and and not debatable facts. These are facts, but that's not what we got from this nominee.

And the tragedy of it all is that this has been, I think, a process that has violated what the American people want and what they should expect, which is that when we are in the midst of an election, which will be over in 20 days, it started. It's going to be over in 20 days, 14 million Americans, Rachel, have voted and that there are ramming through this nominee while the American people are voting on who will be their next president is unconscionable.

Joe and I have been very clear. Let the American people decide who will fill that seat in the White House and then fill the seat in the United States Supreme Court. Anything less than that is really contrary to, I think, the best principles about what we do in a democracy.

As you just articulated there, you have also in the past called this process around Judge Barritt illegitimate. You just described there why you believe this is an illegitimate process. Given that and in light of Judge Barret's refusal to answer any substantive questions at all in this confirmation process, do you think it was a mistake for Democrats to actually show up and participate in these hearings at all, which arguably grants them some sheen of legitimacy? Would it have been better to just sit this process out, describe it as a legitimate say?

We don't have the power to stop it, but we're not going to grant our imprimatur of legitimacy to this to this process? Well, I have to say that I believe that the Democratic senators have been very consistent and unified in pointing out the the sham of this process and and the illegitimacy of it, and also pointing out to the American people what's at stake in terms of, for example, the Affordable Care Act, which I know from traveling the country, is the number one topic on people's minds and in the issue that keeps them up at night, which is the access to affordable health care.

And I think really what we need to do right now is hold these Republican senators accountable for what they're doing, which is forcing upon the American people this process, while not Rachel, while not dealing with relief for the tens of millions of people who have found themselves unemployed for the the renters. Almost half of renters in America right now are worried they're not going to be able to make rent next month. The one in five mothers was describing her children under the age of 12 as being hungry.

The thousands and thousands of people that are in food lines every day in America because we're not talking about it, but we're in the midst of a hunger crisis. And these Republican senators instead want to ram through this justice, this nomination, without giving American people the relief that they so desperately need. Right now. It is unconscionable what they are doing and they should be held accountable because this is, again, a distraction from the failures of this administration, which is covid and all that it has caused in terms of harm.

And it is an example of of of an agenda that is purely about politics and their their weird obsession with getting rid of anything Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, which is all about their politics and not about what we should be doing to relieve the pain and the suffering of the American people right now. As you intimated, though, there is a sort of fait accompli aspect of the Barrett nomination, I mean, barring something changing in an unforeseen way in the few days, it's likely that the Republicans will be able to confirm her with zero Democratic support.

And as you and your colleagues have highlighted her record, her statements, particularly her her her lifelong activism on issues like abortion, suggest that her confirmation really could be the undoing of health insurance very quickly for tens of millions of Americans. While we're in the middle of a pandemic, it could also mean the undoing of same sex marriage rights, the undoing of reproductive rights at a grand scale, not just Roe, but also I mean, today she questioned she raised questions about rulings that protect even married couples access to contraception.

Fertility doctors have come out in an unprecedented way and essentially and endorsed her, called for her not to be confirmed to the court because of her participation with groups in the past that want in vitro fertilization treated as manslaughter and people locked up for that. Given that record and given that if she's confirmed, it will essentially be a six three court with her on the the side of six. What do you say tonight to Americans who are who are scared about that, who don't think of this as an abstract issue or a political issue, aren't gaming this out, but who are worried about their rights and their families when she's confirmed?

You're right, Rachel and I actually talked about that today in the hearing, people are scared, you're right. Civil rights are on the line, workers rights are on the line and consumer rights are on the line. Health care is on the line. These all of these things are at stake. You are absolutely right. And the only point that I can make to hopefully relieve some of that righteous fear is we have an election coming up. And it's not only about the White House, it's about the Senate.

And I've been in the United States Senate now for three and a half years. And I'm going to tell you something. I've been serving on this Judiciary Committee for a while. The Senate makes decisions about who will be in these lifetime positions on these courts.

And it is there that these decisions will be ultimately made about our civil rights, about our right to love who we love and marry them, about our right to have equality and equal justice under law, about whether we protect collective bargaining and the rights of workers, whether we agree that access to health care should be a right and not just a privilege of those who can afford it. That's where those decisions are made in the United States Senate has a lot to do with it.

And when we take back the Senate and have the majority, we will have a lot to do with whether or not we are one step closer to those ideals we hold dear.

Right now, we don't have the majority in the Senate. And so what have we seen with Donald Trump and this Senate? We have seen nominations because I've been there. I've witnessed it on the Judiciary Committee. I mentioned this in the debate, Rachel, 50 nominations and confirmations to the United States Court of Appeal, Court of Appeals for lifetime lifetime appointments. Know of the fifty, not one person is black. I've been watching where they bring in these nominees who are unwilling to agree that Brown v.

Board of Education is precedent.

It's crazy. And I mean, you know, to use it a term.

So there is one thing we can do among the many things, but let's not stop protesting. Let's not stop being active. Let's not stop speaking up and shouting when necessary and let's vote and let's vote, guys. Let's vote. So I have one last question for you, and it is along these these same lines, there has been a lot of talk from the right that there is an anti Catholic bias against Jamie County Barrett, even though I think she would be the sixth Catholic on the court out of nine if she is confirmed.

And although despite the fact that her her faith hasn't been a matter of discussion during the confirmation process from Democratic senators whatsoever, I'm struck by that criticism from the right. At the same time, President Trump and other Republicans supporting him, including speakers at the Republican convention, have routinely and aggressively questioned Joe Biden's faith. The president accusing Joe Biden of being against God and Vice President Biden being called Catholic in name only. I wonder if you have talked to the vice president about those attacks on his faith and if if you know how he feels about them and how you to handle that as part of the campaign.

Listen, I am a person of faith, Joe Biden, as a person of faith, and the one thing I will you I talked to Joe all the time. I first of all, I love Joe Biden. He's such a good person. And he is he he's an incredible leader and he is so deep of faith and an incredible optimist in the midst of all that we are saying. And, you know, and I and I, I'm going to say I think it's hurtful to Joe, to be honest.

He goes to mass every Sunday. He he for him has his faith is a part of him.

I think many people, contrary to what the president and these political people are trying to play, are very excited about the fact that we have the potential to elect the second Catholic practicing Catholic ever to be president of the United States. And and, you know, I think that that Joe feels the way most people do, which is that their relationship with God and their relationship with their faith is something that cannot be tarnished by other people's perceptions of who they are.

And I think Joe's very strong that way.

Senator, I know I said that was the last question, but I lied right before we had that discussion about God, which is a very bad way to do it. But I just realized that I would kick myself if I didn't just ask you before I let you go if you noticed the fly on Vice President Pence's head at the time during the raid, or if that was something that on the go could we could see it at home.

Could you see it sitting next to him?

Did did you have feelings about like did you have the instinct to you know, I just you know, I think that it's important that we kind of find a way to move on and, you know, kind of fly away from this subject to something else. Yeah. So, Harris, you are very kind.

And let's just spare a thought right now for the people who have to write closed captions for this portion of the interview and for those who have to transcribe it because they're going to have no idea how to convey what we just communicated. Senator Harris, thank you so much for taking this much time. I know it's an exhausting time, incredibly, incredibly important time for our country and for history. Thank you for being here. Thank you, Rachel, thank you very much for all that you do.

Thank you. All right. We'll be right back. It's.

Hey, I'm Andy, if you don't know me, it's probably because I'm not famous, but I did start a men's grooming company called Herries. The idea for Harrys came out of a frustrating experience I had buying razor blades. Most brands were overpriced, overdesigned and out of touch. And Harry's our approach is simple. Here's our secret. We make sharp, durable blades and sell them at honest prices for as low as two dollars each. We care about quality so much that we do some crazy things like buy a world class German blade factory.

Obsessing over every detail means we're confident and offering 100 hundred percent quality guarantee. Millions of guys have already made the switch to Herries. So thank you if you're one of them. And if you're not, we hope you give us a try with this special offer. Get a Harry starter set with a five blade, razor weighted handle, shave gel and a travel cover, all for just three bucks plus free shipping. Just go to Harrys Dotcom and enter five zero five zero at checkout.

That's Herries Dotcom Code five zero five zero. Enjoy. Do you feel safe campaigning during covid? Well, we've been very safe, and again, the president has made fun of us, but we wear masks, we we social distancing and and so the events are you know, it's it's you know, where I'd like to hug people. You don't have people these days. That's not an option. You can't shake hands. But but you can't look people in the eye and you can listen and you can be there.

Democratic vice presidential nominee Senator Kamala Harris speaking with me just moments ago. I want to bring in now my panel and the host of All In right here on this network weeknights at eight o'clock, Chris Hayes. I am blessed to have both very good colleagues and very good friends. Chris, thank you for sticking around tonight. My great pleasure.

Let me just ask you, I, I, I feel like the it is going to stick out for a lot of people that she confirmed that she saw the flyer that was on the vice president's head. But let's just leave that where it is that's told its own story. Besides that, what what else stuck out to you from this interview and from where Kamala Harris is at right now? You know, two things. One, I think the most striking thing was her answer to your question about which is the question.

I think we all have and I've been asking on my show every night about the Amy Barrett hearings. Right. There's just some this feeling of impotence, the frustration of like they're doing it.

They have the votes. This is happening probably going to be very bad for a lot of things that Democrats believe in and progressives and liberals. And, you know, Joe Biden has been hounded with this question about whether he would consider expanding the court.

And I thought she gave a kind of interesting and fairly deft answer that seemed to kind of like conjuror lean towards that without ever saying it about the power that the Senate has and the sort of importance of building a Senate majority.

Because it is true that all the talk about court expansion, a court balancing or what will come, you know, on the other side of the bridge requires Joe Biden to win and the Democrats to take the Senate and also to to take the House and have all three houses before you even get to that question. And I thought her answer to that, it seemed to me that that was essentially what she was saying. I thought she did a pretty deft way compared to this sort of weird game we've been playing with the campaign reporters and Biden.

I agree, and I feel like, you know, that everybody keeps asking Biden and Harris the same question and the right is having all this, like, concerns rolling over, like whether or not they're going to violate norms like one thing or the other option is Donald Trump.

But is there I mean, is this one of those situations, though, where we should be looking for what they do rather than just what they say? I mean, are there things that a presidential campaign, a presidential contender, a vice presidential contender can do to prioritize the down ballot Senate races that are going to make it possible for them to govern if they actually get control? I thought that that pivot that she made to was also really important. But what should we be looking for from Biden and Harris for them to kind of put their money where their mouth is and trying to boost Democratic Senate candidate?

Well, there's two things.

One, I think it is notable that they haven't just said, no, we're not going to do it right. So, I mean, they haven't said no, we're not going to do it, which itself is a statement. And that's part of the reason that we're playing this ring around the Rosie.

The the second thing to me is when you talk about down ballot candidates, you know, one of the things back during the primary, there was a lot of discussions about electability. And I thought a lot of those got pretty gauzy about people's ability to sort of project out the future and project the mind of the median voter. But I remember the one argument that most landed for me about Biden and electability was that I had several conversations with members of Congress in swing districts who were like, absolutely, I want him at the top of the ticket.

It's not really close for me. Like I believe me, I know my district. I am telling you, that's a person I want at the top of the ticket. And thus far, that theory of the case appears to be bearing out. Right? I mean, it really does seem the case that his favorability numbers have gone up over the course of the campaign, which is remarkable. The Trump campaign keeps trying to find new ways to sort of create some monstrous socialist version of him or to run against Kamala Harris herself.

And so in that I mean, look, I think the objective for Democrats is two steps.

Build power and then use power. And you build power in this case by winning as many elections as you can. And then you figure out what to do with that power when you're in office.

Yeah, and I mean, I think that's I think that's exactly right, and I think that my sort of take away from this interview and this is the first chance I've had to speak with Senator Harris since she's the nominee, is that it sort of puts the focus for me on the fact that there isn't a Senate race or I think a congressional race anywhere in the country that has been hurt by the Democrats choosing Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as their ticket.

They're they literally have been value added in every single state, in every single district where a Democrat is running anywhere on the ticket and they know it. And that's why they're talking about how they're going to govern. That's why they're talking about the rest of the ticket. That's why they're talking about getting the early vote locked in. It's a position of strength, but we still got many days ahead. Chris Hayes, thank you for working late tonight. I really appreciate it.

My pleasure. Thank you, Tom. All right. We got more ahead here tonight. Stay with us. Iowa residents on their way to President Trump's rally at the Des Moines Airport tonight were greeted by this actually quite literally amazing billboard, Trump covid super super spreader event with a big arrow pointing toward the venue where the president held his event. The billboard is the work of a group called Rural America Twenty Twenty, and it is hilarious and spot on.

Also, the president's rally at a hangar at the Des Moines Airport tonight really did violate all public health recommendations about covid. Look at this. In fact, it violated the recommendations about covid from the president's own White House. The Des Moines Register pointing out today that the latest report from the White House coronavirus task force puts Des Moines, Iowa, in the yellow zone for covid transmission. And per the White House gathering's in yellow zones are supposed to be limited to twenty five or fewer people.

President's rally tonight had thousands of people at it in Des Moines, but the president apparently feels like he really needs to be in Iowa right now, even though he won that state four years ago by nearly 10 points, he looks to be very much in danger of losing it next month. Polls in the last month have had the race between Trump and Biden in Iowa and anywhere from a tie to a Biden lead of five points. And it's not just the presidential race that Republicans are at risk of losing in Iowa, incumbent Republican US Senator Joni Ernst has been trailing her Democratic challenger, Teresa Greenfield.

In every poll in Iowa for the last month, Senator Ernst has been consistently down two or three or even five points to Greenfield. Republicans cannot afford to lose her Senate seat if they want to hold on to the Senate, but it looks like Teresa Greenfield is poised to take it away from her. So it's Iowa tonight for the president's covid super spreader rally. Tomorrow, the president will be in North Carolina, as will vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris. On the Democratic side, as she just told us, tomorrow is the first day of early voting in North Carolina.

That state is absolutely on the table in terms of the presidential race. Biden has maintained a narrow lead in just about every poll in North Carolina in the last month. But the news is even worse for the incumbent Republican US senator who's trying to hold on to his seat in North Carolina. That's Republican Senator Thom Tillis. He's been consistently down in the polls recently by a larger margin than Joni Ernst has been in Iowa, even in polls taken after Tillis Democratic opponent admitted sending untoward text messages to a woman who was not his wife.

Thom Tillis appears to be losing to Cal Cunningham, if anything, by an even greater margin now. So that's the situation in North Carolina, where early voting starts tomorrow. In case you're wondering why both President Trump and Senator Harris are going to be there tomorrow. We got 20 days to go. 20 days. 20 days to go. More to come tonight. Stay with us. As I discussed earlier this evening with vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris, tomorrow night was supposed to be the second presidential debate.

President Trump, however, backed out and said he wouldn't do it instead of debating Vice President Biden and President Trump will instead tomorrow do a town hall hosted by NBC News at I Kid You, not the exact same time that Joe Biden will be holding a previously announced town hall on ABC News, which is as odd as you think it is. This event tomorrow is not an MSNBC event. It is being done by NBC News, but it will be simulcast on our air starting at 8:00 p.m. tomorrow night.

It'll run exactly one hour, which means it will be over before this show starts as normal in its usual place. I will see you here 9:00 p.m. Eastern tomorrow night, The Rachel Maddow Show weeknights at 9:00 Eastern on MSNBC.

As an election year, like no other heats up turned to MSNBC for the context and clarity you need for big debate nights, election night and daily developments, the team at MSNBC will help connect the dots. Rachel Maddow, Nicolle Wallace, Joy Reid and Brian Williams host coverage of the pivotal moments. Steve Kornacki breaks down the latest data at the Big Board. And the Road Warriors are embedded with the candidates as they make their final appeal to voters. The sprint to Election Day is here.

Watch on MSNBC.