Transcribe your podcast

Hello, boys and girls, ladies and germs, this is Tim Ferriss. Welcome to another episode of the Tim Ferriss show, my guest today. Many of you all know the name and those who don't will know much more about him shortly. Professor Yuval Noah Harari is a historian and best selling author who is considered one of the most influential public intellectuals in the world. I know that's setting a high bar, but his popular books might ring a Bell Sapiens.


A Brief History of humankind. Homo Davis, A Brief History of Tomorrow and 21 lessons for the 21st century have sold 27 and a half million copies, roughly in 60 languages. I'll let that sink in for people twenty seven point five million copies. That is a lot of square footage or that's a cubic cubic feet cubic meters. They've been recommended by Barack Obama, Chris Evans, Bill Gates and many others. He's also behind Sapience, a graphic history which we'll talk about a brand new graphic novel series in collaboration with comic artists, David Vander Meulen, I think co-writer and Daniel Casanovva, the illustrator.


This beautifully illustrated series is a radical reworking of his book Sapience subtitle A Brief History of Humankind. The series will be published in four volumes, starting with Volume one, The Birth of Humankind, which is available now. His website, Wye and Harare H.R.H. Tricom. You can find him on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram on Twitter. Harare underscored Uvalde. We'll link to all the rest of them at teamed up blogs, podcasts.


This episode is brought to you by peak tea, that's peculiar.


I have had so much time in my life, I've been to China, I've lived in China and Japan, I've done tea tours. I drink a lot of tea and 10 years plus of physical experimentation and tracking has shown me many things. Chief among them, that gut health is critical to just about everything. And you'll see where tea is going to tie into this.


It affects immune function, weight management, mental performance, emotional health, you name it.


I've been drinking fermented poo er tea specifically pretty much every day for years now.


Who delivers more polyphenols and probiotics than you can shake a stick at. It's like providing the optimal fertilizer to your microbiome.


The problem with good power is that it's hard to source, it's hard to find real power that hasn't been exposed to pesticides and other nasties, which is super common.


That's why Peake's fermented purity crystals have become my daily go to. It's so simple. They have so many benefits that I'm going to get into.


And I first learned about them through my friends Dr Peter Attiya and Kevin Rose. Peak crystals are called extracted, using only wild harvested leaves from 250 year old tea trees. I often kickstart my mornings with their pure green tea. They're poor black tea and I alternate between the two.


The rich, earthy flavour of the black specifically is amazing. It's very, very it's like a a delicious barnyard, very peaty if you like whisky and stuff like that.


They triple tocsin screen all of their products for heavy metals, pesticides and toxic mold contaminants commonly found in tea.


There's also zero prep or bring required as the crystals dissolve in seconds.


So you can just drop it into your hot tea. Or I also make iced tea and that saves a ton of time and hassle.


So Peake is offering 50 percent off their properties for the very first time. Exclusive to you, my listeners, this is a sweet offer. Simply visit peak tea dotcom Tim. That's P Q huie t.a dot com forward slash Tim.


This promotion is only available to listeners of this podcast. That's peak t dot com forward slash tim. The discount is automatically applied when you use that URL. You also have a 30 day satisfaction guarantee your purchase is risk free. One more time. Check it out. Peak T. That's peculiar. ETR Dotcom Tim.


This episode is brought to you by all form, if you've been listening to this podcast for a while, you've probably heard me talk about Helix Sleep and their mattresses, which I've been using since twenty seventeen. I have two of them upstairs from where I'm sitting at this moment. And now Helix has gone beyond the bedroom and started making sofas. They just launched a new company called All Form Alpha R.M. and they're making premium customizable sofas and chairs shipped right to your door at a fraction of the cost of traditional stores.


So I'm sitting in my living room right now and it's entirely all form furniture. I've got two chairs, I've got an Ottoman and I have an L sectional couch and I'll come back to that. You can pick your fabric. They're all spill stained and scratch resistant. The sofa color, the color of the legs, the sofa size, the shape to make sure it's perfect for you in your home. Also, all form arrives in just three to seven days and you can assemble it all yourself in a few minutes.


No tools needed. I was quite astonished by how modular and easy these things fit together. Kind of like Lego pieces. They've got armchairs, love seats all the way up to an eight seat sectional. So there's something for everyone. You can also start small and kind of build on top of it. If you want to get a smaller couch and then build out on it, which is actually, in a way, what I did, because I can turn my L sectional couch into a normal straight couch and then with a separate ottoman in a matter of about 60 seconds, it's pretty rad.


So I mentioned I have all these different things in this room. I use the natural, like finish, which is their lightest color, and I dig it. I mean, I've been using these things hours and hours and hours every single day. So I am using what I am sharing with you guys. And if getting a sofa without trying it in sounds risky, you don't need to worry. All forms sofas are delivered directly to your home with fast free shipping and you get 100 days to decide if you want to keep it.


That's more than three months. And if you don't love it, they'll pick it up for free and give you a full refund. Your sofa frame also has a forever warranty that's literally forever. So check it out. Take a look. They've got all sorts of cool stuff to choose from. I was skeptical and actually worked. It worked much better than I could have imagined, and I'm very, very happy. So to find your perfect sofa, check out all form dotcom Tim.


That's a forum dot com slash Tim. All farmers offering 20 percent off all orders to you, my dear listeners, that all form dot com slash Tim. Make sure to use the code Tim at checkout. That's all form dotcom slash Tim and use code Tim at checkout optimal.


At this altitude I can run flat out for a half mile before my hands start shaking. Can I ask you a personal question now it is. I'm a cybernetic organism, living metal and go to Paris, so. You've all been so nice to finally see you. It's good to be here. Thank you for inviting me. So we're going to start in a unusual place, perhaps, OK? And that is with correcting my pronunciation on a word, M.O.s, HIV.


How do you pronounce that and what does it mean?


Oh, that's actually a kind of mistake on Wikipedia. It's a moshav now. It's some it's somehow got around that I live on a moshav, which is some kind of socialist collective community, less radical than the kibbutz. But one of the experiments of socialists in Israel, like decades ago, and it's just not true. I mean, I live in a kind of middle class suburb of Tel Aviv.


And so this is an example for this listing of something that some people call the Wikipedia echo effect, because I tried to correct it so many times and it's just I gave up.


It's stronger than right.


So some point I got into Wikipedia, then it ended up in The Guardian. Then other people cite The Guardian and it just will not go away. It just keeps coming back. So let's go to something that I think is more of a first hand report.


And it's it's a paragraph from your wonderful profile, I should say, answers to Questions in Tribe of Interest, which is my last book from a few years ago. And here's the paragraph I'd like to read and then we'll explore it. Since the first course in 2000, I began practicing Vipassana for two hours every day and each year I take a long meditation retreat for a month or two. It's not an escape from reality. It's getting in touch with reality, at least for two hours a day.


I actually observe reality as it is, while for the other twenty two hours I get overwhelmed by emails and tweets and funny cat videos. Without the focus and clarity provided by this practice, I could not have written sapience and home videos. So the missing piece here is the first course, would you be open to describing how you ended up going to your first Vipassana experience?


Yeah, I mean, I was doing my PhD Oxford at the time about medieval military history. And I was also looking for the meaning of life and reading lots of philosophy books and thinking a lot, and then nothing really clicked. And the friend nagged me for about a year to try a meditation retreats instead of reading all these books. And finally I gave up and said, OK, I'll try. I'll see how it is.


And it was really fascinating because, you know, the very first evening, the instructions that I was given by the meditation teacher was very, very simple instructions. I mean, I guess many people heard them that you just focus your entire you sit down, you close your eyes and you just focus your entire attention on your nostrils, on your nose, and you just feel trying to feel whether your breath is coming in or whether your breath is going out.


Sounds like the simplest thing in the world. It's not even a breathing exercise. You don't need to control the breath just to just let it be what it is and just feel what it does. And I couldn't do it for more than 10 seconds, like most people. That, you know, for ten seconds, I would be focusing on my nostrils and my breath and after 10 seconds, my mind would run somewhere like to some memory, some story, some something I forgot to do, something that happened years ago.


And I was rolling that for four minutes before realizing that, hey, I missing my breath and come back. And this was an extremely humiliating and important experience because it made me realize for the first time in my life that I have almost no control over my mind.


That, you know, I was doing my Oxford, I thought it was I was a very intelligent person, very smart and, you know, my mind is my my tool. And I have absolutely no control over it, I give it this very, very simple task and it can't do it. And also you realize how overwhelming this story is that the mind produced.


Ah, and over time, this was not on the first night, but gradually over time, it made me realize that, you know, if you can't focus on the simple reality of your breath coming in and out of your nostrils without being overwhelmed by some story generated in your mind, then how can you hope to understand? I don't know the financial system of the world, the geopolitical system, what's happening in Israel, in the Middle East, much, much bigger things.


If you can't do that, I mean, no matter what I try to do these stories generated by by my own mind get between me and reality.


And most of my life, I just spend on these stories. So it was ever since then, it's one of my main practices in life, is how do you avoid being overwhelmed by the stories that your mind generates?


Why did your friend nag you for a year? Was this a friend who was nagging everybody to go to a class and the teacher? As I understand it, maybe it was in video. I don't or maybe in person isn't going. I know the life span. Did they nag you because there's something about you that told them you would benefit in particular, or was it a general nagging?


I think I mean, I think this guy was nagging everybody in a good way. I still have good friends with him, I think, because I was really looking hard to understand life, to understand what's happening here. Then he thought I would be a good candidate. And then he was absolutely right.


Now, Vipassana clicks. For some people, it doesn't click for others. Some people gravitate to transcendental meditation and repeating a mantra. Other people might find a different type of mindfulness practice, but it clicked for you. What did the before and after look like? If we let's just say go back to that point in time, your first experience, and then we flash forward six months. What had changed six months later or how did your perception will change?


Some things change dramatically. Most things didn't. I mean, you have this kind of false enlightenment experience that you think you realized something very deep and now everything is going to change. And over time, you realize that the deep patterns of yourself, of your own mind are much, much stronger than one course of meditation or practice of six months.


And so it's a very long way. And again, for some people, it doesn't click at all. I mean, when I came out of my first course, I thought, oh, that's easy. Mean you can send anybody there and it will have the same effect later on. I if it doesn't work like that, different things work for different people all the time.


The attention on so many levels, I'm not sure which of these levels is most interesting to you or to our listeners. So I can talk on several of them. You know, everything from simple, simple kind of peace of mind and better mental health. Two big change in my. Working methods in my professional life, I don't think, as I wrote in that passage you read, I don't think I could have written Sapience or Hommel Deals or any of these other books without the practice of meditation, because you need a tremendous amount of focus to do something like that.


And you need to be able to see through the mass of details. And you try to summarize the whole of human history. In five hundred pages, the most important button on the keyboard is delete. That's the big thing. I mean, what are so many important things? What is really important? That's the big question. And I don't think I could have done it without the kind of sharp focus that the meditation gives.


So many people have heard of sapience. Certainly there was a point in Silicon Valley when it first came out and nearly all of my friends seem to be reading the same book. And I think there's a sort of revisionist grand delusion among many readers that sapiens came out and then like the snap of the fingers, 20 million copies, or however many millions of copies were sold worldwide in 60 languages. Now, that doesn't seem to to match the story. Exactly what was the title of the original English version of Sapience and how many copies did it?


So, yeah, it was a long story. I mean, the original English version was titled From Animals into Gods and it's sold. It was a self publication on Amazon and it sold something like two thousand copies. They now go for, I don't know, thousands of dollars or something because they're real collector's items. But yeah, it was it was a long way. It was a long way and you brought in. Then at at that point, a number of professionals, I believe maybe it was your husband who fell, I mean, literary agent, that that was the main thing.


I mean, I have I think I'm quite a good writer, but I have very little skills in terms of publication negotiations or anything to do with the business side of life.


And I tried for some time for maybe a year or two to find a publisher by myself. And it was a complete failure. And then my husband came in and he has much, much better business skills than than I do. And he immediately fired the agent that we were working with at the time. And kind of let's go back to zero. And he was the one that found the best literary agent in Israel, Deborah Harris. And she opened a lot of doors for us.


And we worked on it for I think we kind of we did the translation again in several, several, because originally it was in Hebrew and several rounds of editing and eventually something like three years or more than three years after the Hebrew version, the real English version came out in twenty fourteen.


What were the biggest changes that were made? Aside from the title? I'd be curious to hear the story of sapience, the title itself. But what were some of the changes that were made in the editing process before the grand debut of the new version? If anything, I don't know if it's just fine tuning the fine tuning. Nothing major changes. I mean, there are all the major themes and ideas were already there in the Hebrew version. We just really redo the translation and edit it.


And I mean, shortening here. And there are a few things. But but there was no major revision to the content. It was mainly issues of style and the entire kind of business approach of who to work with and how.


And you correct me if I'm wrong, because you never know what you read on the Internet, the degree of veracity, but that it was based on lectures you had given previously.


Yeah. Is that true? That's correct. I gave like four, five, six years previously. I was giving a course at the Hebrew University, which was basically introduction to the history of the world. And at some point, after working on it for a couple of years, I began handing out my notes to the students because I wanted them to focus on what I was saying and be part of the discussion instead of just scribbling down whatever I say.


So I told them to forget. I mean, you don't need to write anything. I'll give you my notes. And then the notes started circulating not only among the students of the class, but also other students at the university. And this kind of gave me the idea that, well, maybe there is a larger audience for this. And I began working on turning this lecture notes into into a book.


It was a long way, but a lot of the major ideas were there in the in the lecture notes.


And I wanted to hear more about this because I've seen in some books that I've quite enjoyed, like Zero to One by Peter Thiel and his his co-writer also came from lecture notes originally at Stanford.


Yeah, it's a good method because the students take no bullshit. You know, when you write when you write a book and it's only you and the screen and the computer, the computer suffers everything. Whatever you write, the computer is fine with it. It's too long. It's it's incomprehensible. It's boring. The computer doesn't care. But the students give you immediate feedback. I mean, if you stand in class and you and you talk and you see that the students have lost interest, then that's a sign or they just don't understand what you're saying.


And the great thing about this, it wasn't really an introduction to first you students and and Israeli students. And, you know, if if if if it was, I don't know, in Oxford, then maybe it wouldn't work. But Israeli students, they tell you exactly what they think about you and what they say. So I got immediate feedback about everything. And maybe the most important feedback is that and I was trying to explain the really basic concepts of human history.


What is religion, what is money, what is capitalism? And you need you know, when you talk with professors or doctors, you can talk in a very, very complicated way. So nobody realizes, including yourself, that you don't really know what you are talking about.


But with first you students, you have to use very simple language. And that's a big challenge. The simpler the language, the bigger the challenge. It really shows you and your listeners whether you know what you're talking about or not. You can't hide behind professional jargon and very complicated. I don't know, language and so so it was it forced me like I was trying to explain what is money, and I had to go back again and again to to the to the core and into the lecture notes.


And do you really understand what I'm talking about? If I really understand, I should be able to make it simpler. I should be able to give a straightforward example.


It makes me think quite a bit about Richard Feynman, the physicist who is very, very esteemed teacher, and felt very similarly that that professionals could hide behind the labels. Right. Pointing at the bird and knowing the name is very different from understanding the bird. And if you have to describe it in simple terms, it's a real challenge of of competence and clarity. As a teacher, you mentioned the term suffering and I again want you to fact check me.


But it seems to me in doing homework and reading your work that you are very attuned to suffering, whether that is in the animal world, whether that is in the human experience, whether that is in your own experience, say, with the endless cloudy days in Oxford at one point.


Could you speak to how you developed that sensitivity? If if I'm not imposing that on you because I mean, I'm looking behind you right now and people might not be watching this video, but you have some calligraphy behind you, which is I believe it's Foshan, which is like Buddhist heart or Buddhist mind suffering is somebody gave president.


And I think it's yeah, it's it's beautiful.


So that's what that's what it says. OK, and suffering and the concept of suffering is is also central to a lot of Buddhist thought. Yeah. Could you speak to how you think about suffering or why that is is something that you're so cognizant of?


Yeah, I realised both in my personal life and in my work as a historian that this is the big question. I mean, the big question is not the meaning of life. And the big question is not how you satisfy some gods or how you achieve this or that goal. The big question is how you liberate yourself and others from suffering. And this is also, I think the main theme of human history is most historians are focused on the question of power.


If you take most history books and also most economic books and so forth, they are about power.


They are not just a guide to how to get power, but about then the history of power, conflicts about power between two kings, between two kingdoms, between two gods, between two religions, between two classes.


These are most historic books are about that. And it's an important part, but it's not a bottom line. I think the bottom line, OK. What does all this mean in terms of happiness and suffering? So, OK, so the Roman Empire rose to power. Did it actually make humans happier? Did it make them more miserable if it had no noticeable effect on, say, average happiness in the world, what does it matter whether they won or lost?


And in my work, I try to always keep both of these perspectives at the same time, the perspective of of of power and of suffering, especially because humans are very, very good as a species, not all humans, but as a species. We are very good in acquiring more power, but we are not good at all in translating power into happiness. And for me, the big paradox of history is that it is obvious we are thousands of times more powerful than people in the Stone Age, but it's not clear whether we are at all happier than they were.


Maybe we are happier a bit, but not thousands of times more happier. So something is wrong. You know, it's like a car which, you know, you press the fuel pedal with all your strength, but your gear is in neutral. I mean, we have so much power and it doesn't move anywhere. And it's also often the case in your personal life that you can achieve so much. And then, you know, you look inside and you ask me actually happier than I was 10 years ago or 20 years ago and maybe not.


And one of the things I also realized personally and collectively as a historian is that we just don't understand suffering very well. One of the main problems is that people think that. With regard to suffering. It's obvious what suffering is, the big problem is how to make it, how to make it disappear. I know that I don't know, pain is suffering. I don't have enough money that that's the cause of my suffering. So now let's focus on getting more money or getting a medicine.


And the mistake is that you don't really understand the deep causes and mechanisms of suffering. You see just part of it, obviously, pain and suffering. That's true. But there is much more to it. And if we spend a little more time on understanding the deep mechanisms of misery and dissatisfaction in life, then we can act far more effectively in trying to alleviate it.


Can you speak to the the test of suffering to determine what entities are real and what are not? What the illusion and what or not? I mean, it's illusion, maybe abstractions. Oh, the main way that humans gain power is through collective cooperation. As individuals, we are not particularly powerful animals in a match between a human and chimpanzee. The chimpanzee will easily win the big advantage of humans. We can cooperate basically in unlimited numbers, thousands, millions today, even billions cooperate together.


Chimpanzees can cooperate more than, say, 50 or 100, that that's about the limit. And then what enables us to cooperate in very large numbers? These this is our ability to invent and believe in fictional stories and the fictional entities, all the big heroes of history, almost all of them are fictional entities that exist only in our imagination, only the stories that we create nations, gods, money, corporations, states. The only place they exist is in the stories that we invent and tell as they are.


They are not physical or biological realities. Again, the United States or Israel, the only place it exists is in the story that millions of people believe, and it's the same with money it has. You know, money has absolutely no objective value. But as long as millions of people believe in the story about the dollar or the story about the euro, it works now. When you say that sometimes people go to the other extreme and think that what you are saying is that nothing is real, that the entire world is just one big illusion, but that's not the case.


I mean, there is still reality. There are still chimpanzees and elephants and humans. And there is a very, very simple test to know whether the hero of the story that you're telling is a real entity or a fictional entity invented by humans and existing only in their imagination.


And that is the test of suffering.


That's a human being can suffer, a cow can suffer, an elephant can suffer, but a nation can't. If a nation loses a war, it doesn't suffer. It has no mind. It can't feel pain or sadness or fear. The soldiers who are fighting for the nation, the citizens in that nation, are being conquered by some other nation, that they can suffer a lot of things, but the nations can't suffer. It should be obvious. And it's the same with corporations.


Even if the corporation loses a billion dollar, it doesn't suffer. If it goes bankrupt, it doesn't suffer because it has no mind control. Pain can't feel anything. So it's you know, it's a very, very simple test that we should remind ourselves from time to time what is real in the world and what of these fictional stories? I'm not against the stories. We need them. They are the basis for cooperation.


But we should always remember we created them as tools to serve us.


We shouldn't be enslaved by them. If a story enables people to cooperate well and thereby improve their lives, that's wonderful. But once you forget, it's just a story and you begin entire wars just in order to protect, to defend the honor of the nation or to increase the profits of the corporation, something went wrong. Just a quick thanks to one of our sponsors, and we'll be right back to the show. This episode is brought to you by LinkedIn Jobs.


The colorful days of fall are now upon us. Are your small businesses needs evolving, changing with the times? Certainly true for me and my team. And despite the current uncertainty in the world, having the right people on your team can wrap you in feelings of security and peace of mind like a warm blanket. It's never been more important to find and hire the right people. LinkedIn has an active community of professionals, more than 690 million members worldwide.


And when your business is ready to make that next hire, LinkedIn jobs can help you find the right person quickly by matching your role with qualified candidates. Getting started is easier than ever with new features to help you find qualified candidates quickly manage job posts and contact candidates. From one simple view on LinkedIn dotcoms familiar website. It's super easy. Identify strong candidates with their efficient rating system to easily get your job in front of more qualified professionals. And now you can also do all of this from your mobile device.


So when your business is ready to make that next hire, or if you want to check it out, find the right person faster. With LinkedIn jobs, you can pay what you want and get the first fifty dollars off. Just visit LinkedIn, dotcom, tim all caps. Tim again, that's LinkedIn dot com. Tim To get fifty dollars off of your first job, post terms and conditions apply.


What is the story if there is one or two stories that you have around money yourself? I was reading The New Yorker profile not from not too long ago. And you probably know the paragraph that I might be thinking about where you and your husband might relate to money differently. What are the stories that that you have for yourself in your life? Money. But in essence, money is just trust. It's the most successful and universal system of mutual trust that humans ever came up with.


And therefore, I don't think it's bad. You know, it's very common for historians and philosophers and people like that. Oh, money is the source of all evil in the world. I don't think so. It sometimes it causes a lot of bad things. But in itself, it's a wonderful thing. It's just a system of mutual trust that, you know, fifty thousand years ago to trust somebody, you need to know them personally. You need to know their personality, what they did in the past.


They like you. They don't like you. And that makes it very, very hard to cooperate in large numbers because you can't know a lot of people personally. And it also makes it particularly hard to cooperate with strangers and foreigners that you don't know. Now, you look at today, I can go to a supermarket and a complete stranger that I never met in my life would give me food that I can actually eat, which was grown by a couple of other people on the other side of the world.


And I was transported from that field or plantation to the supermarket by a bunch of other people. None of us knows. So how do we cooperate so effectively? How do we trust each other? Um, money makes it possible. And money is really it's just trust. You know, in the beginning, money was and because people didn't have a lot of trust, then money had to be made from something within objective value, which doesn't depend on human belief.


Some of the first money that we know about was simply grain. You paid for things with grain and grain, you know, if you can eat them, if nothing works. But gradually, people. That the thrust increased and today, most money in the world is just digital data being passed between computers. Most money is not even bank notes and coins. I don't know, like five percent or something of their of their money is physical money. Most of it is just digital.


When during this crisis in recent years, governments and banks in the US, in Europe, elsewhere created trillions of dollars. They didn't even bother to print the money. You just have some official in some bank goes into the computer as a zero sum where you have a trillion dollars emerging out of nothing. And it works. I mean, it works because people have so much trust in the banks, in the governments, not only of their own country.


That's the amazing thing. I mean, you would have thought, well, you can only use the money if you're governor. You think about even not Islamic fundamentalists, ISIS, they hated America. They hated American politics, American culture, American religion.


But they had nothing against American dollars when they conquered, I don't know, Mosul and enter the banks. They didn't burn the dollars that were there. They took them. They used them. So that's amazing that you can have such a level of trust, even between complete enemies. And in my personal life, therefore, I don't have a negative attitude towards money. Um, I think for me, I'm also I'm not chasing it a lot. But for me, the best thing about money is not to think about it.


I'm not much wealthier than I was 10 years ago. I'm just a young professor back then. Not that I was ever poor, but I'm not much more wealthier. And the the thing I like most about my wealth today is that I simply don't have to think about money. I go to the supermarket and I don't know. In Israel, pineapples are very expensive. So if I wanted pineapple, I just I don't even look at how much it costs.


I just I want the pineapple. OK, let's take it.


You've mentioned the alleviating of suffering and getting a better understanding, first of defining the problem as opposed to just rushing to solutions and getting a better understanding of suffering. Are there ways in which your life, in contrast to, say, not thinking about money, has been complicated or made harder to navigate with the tremendous success of sapience and becoming more publicly visible? In other words, was it as as just an example, easier to find sort of tranquility and connection with bodily sensations as a way to integrate yourself back at Oxford compared to today?


No, but I have 20 years of experience now in doing that. So I don't know.


Maybe if I remained an anonymous professor of medieval history, I would have much deeper experiences of meditation today.


Maybe not. It's impossible to know.


I still have time now. I'm not so busy. I have now a large team like again, thanks to my husband to kind of set it up. We now have a team of fifteen people working for us, so I get something like, I don't know, fifteen, twenty emails a day. That's it. And like this conversation, I didn't have to do anything, I just had to come like two minutes before it started and just like plug myself in and that's it.


Somebody organized everything. So I'm not extremely busy. I still have two hours every day to meditate. I still go every year for a long retreat of the thirty days or forty or sixty days, something like that.


Um, no. I mean I think a lot, a lot of things to think, but I thought a lot even before that.


So I mean the content of my thoughts changed, but I don't think the intensity changed. One of the things I realised for now, being this famous public intellectual and meeting all these famous people and leaders is that everybody is basically the same.


When you are prime minister or president of a superpower, you can't be more worried. Then when you run a small business, it's impossible. It's still you know, it's the same brain. It's the same mind. So if you have a small shop and you're the only worker, maybe and it's now caronna time and you have to shut it down and you have to pay your mortgage and whatever, and you worry about it all day, it's basically the same with a prime minister or president that worries about the economic crisis or a war.


It's now, of course, objectively they have to be much more worried, but they can't. They have the same brain that you have. So it really depends on, you know, maybe they are even far less worried than you are if you are an extremely erratic person. I don't know if Woody Allen had a small shop. And I think he would be much more worried about his shop than certain presidents and prime ministers today in the world are worried about their countries.


I read a read a quote from you. This is in The New York Times. If if I was a superpower, my superpower would be detachment.


Feel free to correct that if need be. But assuming there's some grain of truth to that. Could you expand on that, please?


Yeah, I think it is true that I, I can keep a kind of distance from situations, from development in my personal life or in or in world history. And even though I have my opinions and my preferences, I have a certain ability to to keep a distance and say look at things from from different angles. And also it makes me very skeptical about my own positions that maybe I maybe I just don't know, maybe I'm wrong about it.


And it could have been, you know, debilitating that I can't like. How can you read the history of the world if you're not sure about what you say? But actually, I find it I just don't take myself 100 percent seriously. So, OK, so maybe I'll write something in it's nonsense.


So OK, well, but that's when they wrote Sapience. Initially, I had no idea it would be a big success. So I was kind of had this defense that I thought nobody's going to read it, like maybe my students at university would read it and maybe a couple of other people, but that's it. So I you know, I can write what I want basically. And later on, when when I became very successful, it was the other way around then that, you know, it doesn't matter anymore that if I'm if I write something and it's not and I'm not 100 percent sure about it.


Then I can take the hit. Then, OK, so people will find out that I wrote something wrong, and that's fine, that's part of the business.


I mean, if you really want to write these kinds of big books, you have to accept to some extent that you will make mistakes and that you will not get everything right if you want. If you're a perfectionist, then it's better to write the history of kind of one battle in the Middle Ages that then you're on safer ground.


This is going to seem like a strange question, perhaps, and if it goes nowhere, that's totally fine. But I'm curious, what do your close friends come to you for when it comes to advice? Like what type of advice do your friends come to you for? Is there any any pattern to it or any particular stand up?


It depends on the friends. I think I have a core of very good friends that go with me for years. I mean, from long before I think that since I became kind of famous, I made maybe just one or two new good friends. Almost all my good friends are with me from years back and I have different relationships with each of them. It's like each one of them holds a different part of my inner world or of my life. And I hold different parts of the world.


So, you know, they don't come for me to me for advice about history, that's for sure.


Maybe they'll ask me, well, what do you think will happen in the US elections? And they say, I don't know.


But I mean, if if something really big happens, I don't know when they are during the height of the of the terrorist wave in the world. So they would come and at least some of them and I would say, look, for a big historical perspective, this is not so important. You know, every person that dies in a terrorist attack is the entire world destroyed. But looking at the big picture from the history of the world, this is a very small affair.


I mean, I can explain to you why terrorism gets so much attention. It's basically theater. These people are experts in theater, not in war. And they are very good at it. So they get so much attention. But you don't need to worry that the terrorists will take over the world. It's not going to happen. Most of the things, you know, it's like somebody is breaking up with their boyfriend girlfriend, somebody is just having a lousy day at work and the usual things, the usual stuff.


What would they say, your superpowers if you said it's detachment, which we could dig further into?


But is there any other observations that they would have if if we gave all of your closest friends to drinks and we said, OK, you've off superpower? What is it? What might they say?


First, they will say different things because they know different angles of me. Right? I think some of them will say, I suppose that I'm a good listener, partly because I talk so much during my work.


But like when I meet these friends, I like to be quiet and just let somebody else do the talking for a while, which is a very good thing, because very, very often when people come to you for help, they just want you to listen. They don't want you to solve the problems. They don't you know, it often happens that somebody comes in with a problem and you don't have patience for them. So you think what is the fastest way to get rid of them to end the phone call and find the solution to the problem, then they'll go away.


And this really is the last thing they want. They really just want to complain and for somebody to listen to them. And I'm quite good at it.


Right. You spend all your words during the day and then you can you have the space to listen.


Yes. How do you relate to happiness?


Yeah, I usually prefer to talk about suffering or misery because happiness is far more difficult to nail down.


And why are you miserable? You know it when you're happy. When you think you're happy, you're quite often just deluding yourself. It's not so easy to really understand what's happening there. You know, it really goes down to the level of the body. This is something that I know from meditation. When you have a pain somewhere in your body, it acts like a magnet. They just draws the attention there. There is no way you can miss it.


And you try to to observe other things and you can't. It's just you. And it get drawn back to the painful sensation in the knee, in the stomach, wherever it is.


But when you have pleasant sensations in your body, they have usually the opposite effect. They throw you out and you kind of float a couple of feet above the ground. I mean, sometimes people come in meditation and they say, I never have any pleasant sensations in the body. I just have pain and it's never the case. What's true is that when you have pleasant sensations, you don't notice them because the usual effect of feeling something very pleasant, it throws you out.


You start kind of imagining, hey, what if I win the lottery and I'll have a million dollars? I'll do that. I'll do that. And you you lose connection with what at the time that you're having these very pleasant thoughts. You're having very pleasant sensations in the body, but you don't notice it. And it's it's I find it's harder to work and to see what's actually happening there.


But it's I it's even more important than kind of noticing on working with the painful sensations, I mean, most in the end, most of our I would say the the really difficult problems, they begin with the pleasant sensations that we become so attached to them that the moment they are gone, most of the time people don't have very painful experiences.


Most of the time, if you are dissatisfied, it's because you are missing or craving for some very pleasant experience, which is just not there.


And you're not willing to settle for the kind of ordinary, boring thing that you do have.


I want to rewind to your description of your current life compared to your just, say, pre fame life, which seems to be similar in many ways. You've been able to preserve the space to do what you do best. You have this team. You have this this husband is very good at saying no. You have personal assistants who are very good at saying no. And.


So many people listening who have achieved some modicum of success, I think they will listen with great envy because very often, whether they are artists, whether they are business people, what made them successful is often the first thing to get crowded out by the new attention and success that they receive. Aside from luck, because perhaps there is some luck and chance involved in meeting the person who then became your husband, were there any decisions or are there any. Decisions or frameworks or anything at all that has helped you to preserve the space that you have.


I think a very important decision was to keep the meditation first, that like when I plan my day on my plan, my year, it's the first thing I put in the calendar is the meditation retreats and everything else has to find space around that. And that was a very it was a conscious decision and a very important decision that really worked and in a bit similar way also to keep time for my old friends, to keep time for my family and understanding that this is kind of a marathon race and not a sprint.


But OK, it's something very important happens. The new book is coming out. There is a there is a lot of important things. OK, so I can I can change my routines for a while, but over the long run, you have to keep these kind of basic blocks intact. This was a very conscious decision in my case. It worked also to kind of remember what's really important for you in life. For me, I think maybe, you know, on the personal level, I really want to understand life, to understand the world, what is happening.


I noticed quite early that most of kind of the big events that I am participating in, like conferences and so forth, and the important people I meet, they don't really contribute much to that. They don't seem to understand the life or have some particular insight in the big conferences. They never talk about these things. You know, they talk about the global economy. They talk about climate change. They talk about they are important things. But on the deeper level.


Of what's actually happening here, it's I won't get any answers from from there, you know, I don't think it's a coincidence if you look at the whole span of human history and almost none of the important political leaders of humankind made a significant philosophical contribution. To human thought, you have a few exceptions, I know Marcus Aurelius or something like that, but generally speaking, you would have thought that from their vantage point they see something that ordinary mortals don't.


They maybe they reach the top because they have some very keen insight into human nature. And if they have some keen insight, they keep it very, very secret.


Who are some of the people you respect could be past or present for, really? Seeking or seeking what is going on on the deeper levels.


I can tell you, I mean, some of the names of thinkers and writers that influenced me. Great, let's start there. Yes. I mean, Charles Taylor, the Canadian philosopher, really influenced me a lot. His book, The Sources of the Self, is, I think, one of the most important books I read in life, one of the most difficult books also. I mean, if people take this as a kind of reading recommendation, they should be warned.


It's it's really tough going to very, very dense. But if you make it, it's really worth it. Of course, I was very influenced by my meditation teacher as an Goenka, not necessarily by any books he wrote or just by the guidance. I mean, I read sitting in my first wife and of course and and having this this guy really gets it. He really understands what's what's happening. This was something quite surprising for me to see that some of my good friends have some insight into what's happening here.


I can give a list of books that influenced me. I'm not sure if this is kind of the answer to the question, but we are free, free to meander.


This is we don't have to consider it. One of the problems I've realized, it's that. It's extremely difficult to share. The really deep insights you have about life. That very often they are in a non-verbal level. And in any case, my impression is that most of the inner world of most humans is never assured.


They never talk about it because they don't even have the words and don't have the audience, I mean, most of what happens to you deep down during the day, your spouse probably doesn't know, your parents don't know, your children don't know, your friends don't know even you don't know if you don't really make the effort at one of them. Qualities of great art, not just writing, but different kinds of art, that it really gives words, that you feel something for many, maybe for years and you have no idea how to communicate it.


And then you read a poem or you see a TV show. And yes, this is exactly what I am feeling. And I never knew how to communicate it. So that's why those are very difficult to kind of know when you meet somebody and you don't really know what's going on inside them and to what extent they understand or don't understand their life or life in general. So it's very, very hard to say.


Well, you also underscore something that I've thought about a lot recently, which is it's quite unfair to expect other people to understand you fully when you don't understand yourself fully on your own.


It's quite an quite an unfair expectation of people.


Sometimes this is a basic expectations because. Because we have trouble understanding ourselves, we have this hope that somebody will lend us a hand and we have the experience, at least most of us, if we can, from loving families, that when your kids, the word people, they're like our parents who did exactly that for us, even on the most banal level that, you know, a child is crying. And the mother would say, well, you're just tired, just go to sleep and you figure out what you should know, that you're tired.


But no, I mean, it's it's amazing that sometimes people are tired or hungry or whatever and they don't know it. And then somebody who really understand them comes and said, well, just go to sleep. And in my writing, I engage a lot with the issue of the future of surveillance. And I think one of the key fantasies with A.I. and surveillance is that the algorithms will do that for us.


That will this will this ties into one of the books that has had a big impact on you, if I remember correctly. Right. I mean, the Aldous Huxley and Brave New World.


Yeah, Brave New World. It really had really, really deep impact on me because I think he really got it and that he.


The interesting thing about brave new world, it's kind of you know, it's on the surface, it's a dystopia. But when you kind of ask yourself why, what's wrong with Brave New World, it's very difficult to say it. To find out, I mean, everybody seems to be satisfied, everybody seems to be happy, there is a system in place that understands you very, very deeply and makes sure that you will never be in great pain or never suffer any any great misery.


And it's it's a very indecency 1984, like its brother book, 1984. It's a very simple book in the sense that nineteen eighty four describes a terrible, terrible dystopia. The only question is, how do we avoid getting their. But brave, well, do you read it and at least for me, I kind of think, OK, it's all what's what's really wrong with it? And it's not easy to answer this question. Yeah, the the sort of uncanny feeling that something is not quite right, that you can't put words to, it's very similar to the feeling of something that is quite right, that you can't put words to.


That then gets reflected in good art can go both ways in a number of the things that I read in preparation for this from various profiles. There's one that said you prefer television to novels. There is another that gave the example, but have been the same profile of you swimming as part of your routine in the summer and listening to non-fiction books. Yes, via via headsets. But their, I guess their resonant, they deal with the vibration of the stem in the job.


This is a really nice guy. I came across that. I tried to listen through like usual earplugs and water would slip in somehow all the time and would ruin it. And then finally I came across this gadget that you can just put it on your forehead and some in some mysterious way. It works better and you can actually hear better than when you put it in your ears. So I would swim back and forth, back and forth, listening to I don't know, I listen say to Shoshana's Zubov so venis capitalism while swimming back and forth in my pool with with the dolphin headset for the resonance.


That's amazing. So it's a forehead headset perhaps. Do you recall what type it is by any chance? I know this is getting into the minutia.


If you can figure it out, I can go and look for it if it's very important and it's just it's just in the next room. So it will take me a second if you want. Oh yeah.


Let's yeah, sure. Let's let's grab it. Why? I mean, I don't want to say this is the most important thing in the world, but I'm curious. I'll take it in a minute.


So it's a this is how it looks. By the way oh, wow. All right. So it's connected to the dorsal snorkel that goes across the forehead so you don't have to rotate. Yes.


And I don't have to put my head back and forth all the time from the water. It's by Fenice dual Fenice if I and. All right.


We'll we'll find it and put it in the show notes. Thank you for grabbing that in those examples in these profiles, it seems like you are not consuming much written fiction. But Brave New World is fiction.


But yeah, fast becoming reality and maybe also, like you said, philosophy disguised as science fiction. Are there other fiction books that you have found to have an impact on you or your thinking? Or do you do you consume much in terms of quite similar?


Yeah, it's quite similar to Brave New World, I think Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.


I also read books I also listed as a philosophy book. You know, I think that any tragedy impacts on not just on my thinking, but on me, on how I write or work, that I'm not saying it is a kind of, I don't know, metaphor or something that they are philosophy books.


They just are written in a different way. This is one of the ideas that gave me the inspiration to kind of turn sapience into a graphic novel, which we might discuss later on if we have the time that you can play with the form.


I think that Aldous Huxley, when he came to write Brave New World, he had these philosophical issues he wanted to discuss and maybe I'm inventing money. Maybe it wasn't like this at all. But my impression is that he thought, well, it will actually be easier and more interesting and engaging instead of, you know, having this formal logical arguments and instead of having these thought experiments, which philosophers love so much, why not have an entire book, which is one long thought experiment and see where it takes me.


And I think that The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is basically something similar, that it explores a lot of deep philosophical issues.


But in a much more fun way than your typical philosophy book. I could not agree more.


I just literally a few weeks ago listened to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, narrated by Stephen Fry, who's incredible. NARRATOR for the first time.


And you're right that it has so many what otherwise could be very sterile thought experiments and concepts embedded into this entertaining narrative. And I remember one line there talking about the I want to say he's the president of the galaxy or something.


That would be people. BROOKS That's right. People. Brooks And they talk about how successful he was and how people have the mistaken notion that the job of the president is to wield power. But that's not the job of the president to distract from those who are wielding power.


And just these short nuggets contains so much to chew on. And it's really an effective way of providing people with footholds in a way toehold.


And it's the same with TV. Like, I think that black mirror, or at least some of the episodes in Black Mirror are some of the best discussions that I've seen of certain dangerous tendencies in current technology. I mean, some episodes I was just fun. I don't know, like Zanjani Junipero. I think it's it's an extremely good episode, but it describes the reality which is so far away from us that it's not really relevant to any of the discussions here.


But you look at if you saw it nosedive. About the and, you know, maybe the Chinese got the idea for their social credit system from nosedive, but it's such a powerful and important episode of you look at how was it called, the one with the cartoon figure that became president that almost became an MP of the blue. There is something and you know, this is before Trump, this was before this whole wave. And this was so prophetic was really I mean, I when I watched it for the first time in 2013, I thought, what are they talking about?


And then I watched it later, like five years ago. And these guys are just geniuses. I mean, how do they see it coming?


Yeah, it's very it's it's real sweet spot of a near term or not too distant future kind of technological extrapolation. I love Blackmer. I and I always encourage people to watch at least three episodes because I'd say maybe one out of three or one out of four just completely miss for me, they don't sort of strike a chord. So you have to your sample size has to be a few episodes and you'll usually strike on something. Do you have any other?


And we are going to talk about sapience, geographic history, because I have a lot of questions about it before we get there. I have to actually I'll I'll stick with one question before we get there. And that is any other television series could be documentaries also or movies that you think are intelligent examples of philosophy or thought experiments in disguise.


Again, going back to the usual suspects of science fiction, I thought that hair was a very intelligent and, you know, low key exploration of some of the potential of A.I. I don't like these movies. When the robots rebellion kill everybody. I mean, it's implant's the wrong fears and it encourages the wrong discussions. I don't think that in the next 20 or 30 years, the robots are going to rebel and kill everybody. But there are other dangers, much more or less subtle, whether it's the job market, whether it's surveillance and what people do to politics or whether it's, you know, changes in human relationships.


And I thought the terror was a very in this way a very intelligent movie that avoided the usual traps. And it goes back exactly to what we were discussing earlier, that we have a deep yearning that somebody out there in the world would really understand us like we go about life. And we hope that our parents would understand us, that our teachers, our lovers, our kids, somebody please understand me. And for many people, it never happens. And to some extent, somebody understands them.


But there are many hidden corners within themselves that they are unable to communicate and maybe they don't understand them fully. And there is nobody out there that reaches out and kind of engages those corners in them. And there is no technology on the rise which could fulfill that dream. And this is extremely attractive and extremely frightening at the same time. And here is spot on. I mean, what happens when there is an algorithm that constantly observes you, not just what you do, but also what's happening inside your body and really understands your personality, your moods, your likes, dislikes.


You know, you come back home from work and you're grumpy and your husband doesn't notice it, but the computer does notice it. I mean, what kind of world is it? What kind of relationships will there be when computers and objects understands you better than the people in your life? And that's a fascinating and frightening question and I think a very realistic question. We are very unlike the robots repelling and killing everybody. The moment that your smart refrigerator knows you better than your husband is not very far in the future.


And, you know, this is we should be talking more about that.


And I would like to see more movies, more TV shows, more science fiction novels that explore these kinds of questions. You know, if if you haven't read any of Ted Chang's works and here's his a a compilation of short stories called exhalation, OK? And he has another collection of short stories, I think you would absolutely love them. One of his short stories was turned into believe it was a rival about the protagonist, who's this female linguist who decodes the graphic language of these aliens who arrive on Earth.


And it's about temporal perception. It's these are really, really, really incredible stories that Ted Schang and Jian exhalation.


I think I think you'd enjoy it. Let's talk about sapiens graphic history. Well, before we get to that, I want to say that the word understand and the concept of understanding is also fraught with difficulties. And I think that that is part of what I will also demonstrate that knowing quite a few people who work on A.I., what does it mean for, let's just say, a computer or a refrigerator to pass the Turing test so effectively that you feel understood?


Mm hmm. Well, it's not I don't believe it will be conscious. I don't believe that we are near the point when they will have consciousness. And if I understand, you mean the kind of inner feeling that we have when we understand that that's not the case? I think we are not near there, but understand in the sense that able to predict our behavior and response rate unconsciously in a way which will be more appropriate than the people around us.


That's what I mean by it. Yes, it's a weaker definitely I'm not thinking about the conscious experience of understanding. It's about just predicting could be manipulating, but most importantly, just kind of reacting to us in a way that we will find appropriate, more appropriate in the way that we will get so used to having these computers and robots that are very attuned to how we feel that we might become even more irritated with the humans who don't feel we don't react or don't understand how we feel and not react in the right way.


And part of the problem is that so many people, like everybody, are often self-centered. So I don't get what my husband is feeling because I'm too focused on my own, my own feelings. One of the reasons that computers could be better than humans in this is that they don't have feelings. The refrigerator doesn't have any expectations in life from you. He had no dreams, no phantom, nothing, so the refrigerator can be 100 percent focused on what you feel, it has no feelings of its own, so it can't be insulted, can't be angry, nothing.


Sounds like you have an episode of Black Mirror to write with.


And to that point, on some level, we were talking about philosophy disguised as fiction or thought exercise is embedded into, say, black mirror in a way that are not just fascinating, but also prophetic in some respects, sapiens, graphic history. I want to talk about this because I actually have a long history with graphic novels and comic books. I want to be a penciler, a comic book penciler for about 12 years and used to be an illustrator a long time ago.


And then I lived in Japan in high school, went to a Japanese school. And in Japan, unlike in the U.S., there is a long, rich history of comic books and graphic novels for adults and also comic books and graphic novels for teaching difficult concepts, telling history. And these are extended expansive collections of graphic novels. And I've seen how effective it is because I read some of these when I was in Japan on the history of judo and other things, and I would not have consumed 500 pages of pure text, certainly not in Japanese.


And I think it's an incredibly powerful format. How and why did you decide to take sapience and create this piece of art, but also an effective vehicle for perhaps teaching in a different way? Actually, the initiative didn't come from me.


It came from David and Danielle, the two artists who collaborated with me on this project. They came up with the idea. They wrote some initial suggestions and I really liked it. It connected to something that I did want to do for a long time, which is to reach new audiences. I see my main job today as bringing science and history to more people, people who wouldn't necessarily read a traditional science book.


Even if it's popular science, they still want to read it like five hundred pages of text with footnotes. They won't touch it, but they might connect to a graphic novel. And yes, it is for adults and teenagers. I mean, many people in the West have the idea that comics are for kids. But no, it's just a different medium. It's a different language. It enables you to do some things you can't do. You need to cut down the text, but there are many things you can do much better in a graphic novel, certainly to show things like, you know, much of the graphic novel is about the life of hunter gatherers.


So you can just show it in images instead of long descriptions and images worth a thousand words in many cases. It also enabled us to. And for me, it was the most fun project I ever worked on because it was OK.


Let's take all the academic conventions of how you write history and throw them aside.


Let's experiment. So it's kind of a series of experiments in how to tell history.


So, you know, one part about the evolution of different human species, the sapiens, Neanderthals and so forth, it's stored like a reality TV show.


That there are different competition between different human species, then you have an entire chapter about the how humans caused the extinction of many of the large animals of the world as they spread from Africa all over the world.


And this is told as a detective movie, we created this fictional detective, Detective Lopez, like Sherlock Holmes or Agatha Christie, a kind of a person, and she goes around the world and investigates the worst serial killers in history who killed all these big animals. And the invention of the first religions is sold according to the conventions of superhero action movies. So we created this superhero superhero in doctor fiction who embodies the human ability to invent fictional stories and mythologies.


And it was really fun working with David and Daniel on that and just saying, well, why not? We can try that. We can do that. It's allowed. It also forced me and all of us to answer many questions, which we can just ignore in the text. When you draw, you will have to draw specific things. When you write, you can write in abstractions. When you draw, you can't draw obstructions. So if, for instance, you talk about the connection between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals and we now know that some sapiens and Neanderthals had sexual relations and even had children, because most of us today still carry some Neanderthal genes in our DNA, not in a book.


You can just write that sapiens had sex with Neanderthals. End of story. But in a graphic novel, if you want to draw it, you have to make some decisions. I mean, who is the man and who is the woman? Is it a Neanderthal man with the sapience woman or the other way around?


And what about skin color? What about hair color hairstyle? All these questions you can't draw a general human. It must have some skin color, must have some hair color. So we have to go back to the literature, the scientific literature and investigate. And sometimes you find answers, sometimes you don't. And then you have to take into account all the ideological and political issues of race and gender. And so it's it's a huge, huge thing to engage with all these.


And I found it that it's not like, OK, let's just take sapience and add some illustrations. It's a completely fresh project.


How did you problem solve when there was a conflict or some tension between the literature and what might dictate? A drawing and the sort of political sensitivities that exist today, how did you how did you think about that or think through those types of decisions?


We had a lot of discussions about these things. And, you know, it was a balancing act. You can't ignore science just for the sake of being politically correct. On the other hand, you have to be aware of the political implications of the choices you make. I mean, you can't hide behind scientific objectivity because there is no such thing as a completely objective narrative, just choosing what is the opening scene and what is the ending scene. It doesn't come from reality.


It comes from your political, ideological or religious beliefs in reality that the real reality, it has no beginning and end, no historical event, had a beginning and an end and no historical event had a focus. You know, it's even easier to think about it in terms of movies when you watch a movie, let's say, about the Second World War. So the camera is somewhere and something is in the focus of the of the shot. Something is on the side and many things are done.


You don't see them at all. Now, in reality, there is no camera. There is no camera hanging above planet Earth, the camera of history, which point in a particular direction. And this is the center of events and this is the sidelines. You know, you can tell the Second World War with Churchill as the main hero. Hitler and Stalin appearing on some a few a few scenes and millions of Chinese that died in the war, never appearing at all.


And you can do an entire World War Two movie, just about a single Chinese village. Now, both are true.


And what do you choose is not forced on you by the reality. It reflects very often political and ideological and also artistic choices. Now, when you go back to the Stone Age, it's even more complicated because there are so many things we just don't know. I mean, the basic things we don't know what family structure was like. You have all these discussions about what is the natural human family. Lots of people believe, well, you know, it's obvious.


It's a man, a woman, two and a half kids and a dog. This is a traditional family. This was always the case. But we know that even in recent history, this was not always the case. It's not the case today.


In many countries, close to 50 percent of children don't grow up in such a family today. You go back to the Middle Ages, it's not the structure of everybody. You go to biology, to other apes. Chimpanzees don't live like that. Gorillas don't live like that. Orangutans don't live like that.


So how did humans leave fifty thousand years ago? And the answer is, we don't know. We have evidence from the Stone Age. We have tools, but the tools don't tell you what was the family structure.


You have cave paintings. But one of the interesting things about cave painting we found found thousands and thousands of cave paintings from the Stone Age. There is not a single image of a family. There are a lot of mammoth there are a lot of horses there, lots of ibex, there are some humans also mostly stick figures, but there isn't a single image from the Stone Age that you can say, look, that's how they depicted a family. And what does it mean?


Why do people draw all these elephants and never bother to draw their own family? I don't know what it means, but it's it's interesting.


And it gives us is there a lot of artistic freedom about how to deal with these issues? So, like, I don't know, we have this one scene about Neanderthals and, you know, Neanderthals had a big revolution in the last 10 years. Of course, they are dead.


But our understanding of them has completely changed in the last 10 years because of so many new evidence we have both from genetics, but also from artifacts and archaeological records.


And whereas 20 years ago, maybe they were still these arch typical cave people, primitive and brutal and things like that. Now they have a very positive image.


We have not not only because we have the genes in our DNA, but also because we have evidence that they took care of of of wounded people, of elderly people, of disabled people, they had a much more sophisticated technology and maybe even art and culture than we assumed. So we have we depicted in the graphic novel this change in image in this scene that you see these two Neanderthal guys sitting in the office of a PR consultant and the PR consultant has on the wall this old fashioned image of a Neanderthal, a brutal Neanderthal with a big stick and dragging a female by the hair.


And there was a big X over this image. And the PR consultant says, well, you know, this was a good brand for the 19th century, but this is a 21st century. You need to lighten up your brand. And the two Neanderthals say yes. Well, you know, actually, we, too, are gay. So obviously we don't have any evidence that they were gay undertones.


I mean, our scientific understanding of sex and gender today indicates that it's very likely that the word gay Neanderthals. But if you ask for the smoking gun, show me a grave from 50, 20 years ago with two men together. Only then, I believe then of course, we don't have this, but we hardly have we don't have a lot of direct evidence for sex in the Stone Age. We have a lot of indirect evidence like from genes. So we know that sapiens and Neanderthals had sex, but maybe also the worst cases of sapience.


Men having sex with a Neanderthal men could be no evidence in the genes, of course. But could it have happened? Maybe. And we have this artistic license that we can show that it makes sense.


Well, also, I mean, this is maybe going down a rabbit hole. But if you look at the behavior of of chimpanzees and others, I mean, there's there's some evidence to suggest that that have interaction certainly exists. Yeah. I mean, if if you're looking at the current day precursors, in a sense, what is your hope for these graphic novels? And they're coming out for volumes. What do you anticipate or hope the spacing to be of those of those?


Well, we hope for one every year. The main challenge is the drawing. I mean, this is Danielle's job. And I draw like a five year old kid. I mean, they can depend on me for anything when it comes to the drawing. And it takes a lot of time to draw, you know, these hundreds of images. And also it goes back and forth because here Daniel draws an image or a couple of images and send them.


And then I got no archaeological evidence indicates that actually the spear points were not like you depicted. And then the political issues that we need a more balanced gender relations in this image. And and it goes back to Daniel. And he needs to do to to draw it again. And it takes a long time. So I guess it will be one volume each year. And the big hope that it will reach new audiences that may not read, you know, a 400 page text about the history of humankind, but would be interested and would find it fun and engaging when it's told in a graphic novel.


I've seen the graphic novel and it's really well done. I have to say, you know, I've I've I've read I have probably 5000 to 10000 comic books that I've saved and poly bagged over the years and I've collected. Everything from Sandvine in the US to dozens of different graphic novels in Japan. It's very well done. So thank you to you and your team deserve a lot of credit for that. I'd love to ask a question about your mission statement.


Now, I don't know if you would call it a mission statement. Maybe it is. So this is from The New Yorker profile from this year. And it describes how your mission statement reads as follows. And this is on a bulletin board in your office. Keep your eyes on the ball. Focus on the main global problems facing humanity. Learn to distinguish reality from illusion, care about suffering. And I guess there was previously embrace ambiguity. But that got scratched up.




So could you explain the origins of this mission statement, please?


Oh, it's a couple of mission statements. You know, as we expand our team, it becomes more difficult to get everybody on the same page to make sure that everybody, you know, each person has a different personal and professional background. And so when it was just me or just my husband and me, there was no need to write down these official mission statements. But when you have 15 employees, then it becomes important. And we had a long discussion and like a back and forth also with all the employees.


And we came up with these several kind of general guidelines to to keep in mind.


And maybe the most important thing is that we see our task as helping to focus the global conversation on the most important issues. Because one of the big problems of the 21st century is people are flooded by enormous amounts of information. It's not like in the past when information was scarce and the problem was how to get it. Now it's the opposite. And you just don't know what to pay attention to. And it also goes back to my practice of meditation of how to stay focused.


And it's kind of link the personal practice with the global project of again, we don't see ourselves as providing solutions.


But just kind of helping to steer the global conversation in the most important directions, you have such a historical context for determining the relative weight to assign to different events or phenomena in the world, as indicated or described in the example of terrorist attacks and their sort of cultural or I should say cultural and historic significance. Yes, they're horrible. Yes, the theater and graphic nature of it is very compelling to the human psyche, which would also be true of, say, a shark attack.


Right. If a 12 year old boy were attacked by a shark on the east coast of the United States, it would be in every newspaper and there would be a huge response, probably dramatic overharvesting of sharks and so on and so forth. But in the sweep of human history, it's importances is close to zero negligible. What are some of the more important, the main global problems facing humanity from your perspective?


Well, as we speak, I think there are three big ones, nuclear war, which, you know, people tend to connect with the Cold War. Yeah, there was something there about nuclear weapons, but they are still here. And I don't think we'll see a nuclear war in the next few months. But if tensions in the world continue to grow, then it will become again a major issue. And it is an existential issue. Other things can destroy us, but nuclear war can.


So we have to keep it in mind all the time. The second big thing is ecological collapse. It's not just climate change that gets most of the headlines lately. It's many other things also like loss of biodiversity and destruction of habitats and so forth. But generally speaking, yes, we are seeing we are in a war is nuclear war. You know, it's just a future possibility. Maybe it will happen. Maybe it won't happen. Ecological collapse is already beginning all around us and it threatens again, it's an existential danger.


It threatens the foundations of our civilization. I guess that some people will survive it. But if if things really go bad with the economic and political implications of it, it could cost the lives of billions of people.


And the third big one, and I think most complicated, is technological disruption, the consequences of disruptive technologies, especially artificial intelligence and bioengineering.


It's the most complicated challenge because, you know, with nuclear war and climate change and ecological collapse, you can disagree whether it's true or not. But. Everybody agrees what needs to be done about it, to stop it. Nobody thinks that having a nuclear war is a good idea. Nobody thinks that climate change is a good idea. Maybe some people deny it, but they don't say it's good. Now with technological disruption, it's much, much more complicated because it has a lot of positive potential and a lot of people positively wish to see greater and faster technological disruptions.


And there is no agreement whatsoever about what we should do with technologies like A.I. or like bioengineering. Their dreams of some people are the nightmares of other people. So it's very complicated. Again, like like ecological collapse. It's not a future scenario. It's already happening all around us. And I think the piece is such that it may lead to some people. It sounds like crazy, but I strongly believe that given the technologies we are now developing within a century or two, at most our species will disappear.


I don't think that in the end of the 21st, 22nd century, the Earth will still be dominated by Homo sapiens. I think given the immense power of technologies we are developing now, two scenarios.


Only one scenario, which is that the technology will destroy humanity. And I think it's less likely, but still possible, the more likely scenario is that it will change humanity in a profound way, that we will use A.I. and bioengineering to change homosapiens and to create new kinds of beings that will be much more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals or from chimpanzees. To give just one example, I think it is possible that we will create the first in organic life forms after four billion years of organic evolution.


So again, it's not a destruction of our species.


It's the changing of species into something else. But what kind of thing it will be, we have to be extremely careful about that. It won't necessarily be a better version of us. It could be much, much worse.


Could you give us a bit more detail around the new inorganic life form? And in your mind's eye, if we change for the worse in some tech enabled way, deliberately or by accident, what might that look like to you?


Well, I started with the second question of what it could look like. You know, you could use whatever technology to increase the efficiency of people, the intelligence of people at the price of things like artistic sensitivity or like spiritual depth.


I mean, if you ask armies, if you ask corporations, if you ask governments, what do you need from your employees, from your soldiers, they will say, oh, we want people to be more efficient. We want people to reach to be more logical. We want people to be more disciplined. And if you have the technology, then you engineer such people, even if it comes and it always comes that I mean, usually when you improve something, it tends to come at the price of something else and things like, I don't know, spiritual depth.


What kind of army needs its soldiers to have spiritual depth? So if you leave it to the corporations and armies, it's very likely that once you have a technology to change humans, it will, I would say, downgrade them and not upgrade them. It will make them more efficient soldiers or employees or whatever, but it will make them kind of poorer beings, lesser beings. So that's about just one scenario of what does it mean to downgrade people now with regard to inorganic lifeforms?


You know, for four billion years, everything on the planet was all life was organic, whether it's a bacteria or a mammoth or a tree or a human, it's organic, obeys the laws of organic chemistry. Now is the rise of A.I. We might have a chance. Again, I tend to be agnostic about it. I'm not sure.


But it is possible that in a couple of decades we will be able to create either completely inorganic beings. Or at least part organic part in organic cyborgs, and this will be if it happens, it will be the biggest revolution in the history of life since the beginning of life, much, much bigger than the creation of mammoth or the creation of mammals or humans, because it's a completely different game.


Once you're no longer subject to organic chemistry, we can't even begin to imagine what it means because our imagination is the product of organic chemistry. So if you have a kind of intelligence which is not based on organic chemistry, you know, it can be anything.


If you look over the next story, you're talking about the I guess the twenty second century and the prevalence, dominance or existence of Homo sapiens. If we look over the next 50 years just to choose an arbitrary time frame of nuclear war, ecological collapse, or these unforeseen accidents or mistakes of high technology, which scares you the most, or which do you worry about the most?


I worry most about the third. Because of what I said earlier, that it's the most complicated, that it's not enough to be kind of good and wise to deal with the first two, it will be very hard to deal with the first two as it is. But the third one is really complicated because there is no agreement on the goal with the first two, at least there is an agreement on the goal and then that that makes it very, very complicated.


Also, the first one, nobody is actively working to make it happen sooner. And even the people who deny climate change, they are not in favor of climate change. They just say it's not really doesn't happen. But with A.I. and bioengineering, there are some of the most powerful people and organizations and governments and corporations in the world. They are extremely busy making it happen faster. And it's awesome. We don't have a framework even to think about it properly.


So is a thinker and a politician. I think this is where I can contribute the most is in trying to untangle this kind of completely new threat.


Just a few more questions and I'll I'll let you get going know we're separated by quite a few time zones.


When you are thinking about these threats, perhaps harkening back to your times reading Aldous Huxley Huxley's work. And here we're talking about Brave New World and not Island. Very different descriptions, although some parallels when you feel the potential for these various types of collapse or disaster. What keeps you going, where do you find the light, hmm? It's a good question.


Oh, you know, if you're able to deal with your own mortality, as every person has to on some level, then you should be able to deal with the potential mortality of your entire species. I mean, it's still part of biology as individuals come and go, nations come and go. Also, entire species come and go. Ninety nine percent of the species that evolved on planet Earth are gone for one reason or another. Homo sapiens also is not internal, even in the best scenario.


I don't think Homo sapiens will be around in two or three hundred years. The best scenario is that Homo sapiens will disappear. But in a peaceful and gradual way and be replaced by something better. I don't think there is any chance whatsoever that people like us will just continue to have lives like us in 200 years, that there will be 200 years. The professor of history said sitting and having a podcast talk with somebody, it's not going to happen.


I mean, that the changes are going to be too big.


So maybe it goes back again to the practice of meditation and the realization that change is the only certainty in life.


So you might as well tune in to the changes so that you're at least aware that you're responding to your reactions to things outside and not the outside itself. Well, you've all this has been a lot of fun for me. Thank you. Nice to connect with you. And of course, I will link to everything in the show. Notes for people, the volume one of your series Sapiens. A graphic history is out now. Volume one can be found and I'll include links to that in the show.


Notes for everyone who teamed up blogs podcasts. Your website is Why and Harare Facebook is proform. Yuval Noah Harari Twitter Harare. Underscore Evol Instagram. You've all underscored Noah underscore Harare will provide all of those to people.


Don't have to remember them.


Is there anything else that you would like to say to my audience ask of the audience suggest to the audience before we wrap up.


No, just thank you for your time. I know that the time and attention are the most valuable resources today for most people. So I hope you benefited from investing them in listening to us. Likewise.


And I can certainly speak for myself and saying that I enjoyed it quite a lot and definitely check out Ted Chang. And I think he learned I have a bunch of notes for things that I will be checking out and to everyone listening until next time. Thank you for tuning in. Hey, guys, this is Tim again. Just a few more things before you take off. No. One, this is five Bullett Friday. Do you want to get a short email from me?


And would you enjoy getting a short email from me every Friday that provides a little morsel of fun before the weekend and five? Black Friday is a very short email where I share the coolest things I've found or that I've been pondering over the week that could include favorite new albums that I've discovered. It could include gizmos and gadgets and all sorts of weird shit that I've somehow dug up into the world of the esoteric as I do. It could include favorite articles that I have read and that I've shared with my close friends, for instance.


And it's very short. It's just a little tiny bite of goodness before you head off for the weekend. So if you want to receive that, check it out. Just go to four hour work week dotcom. That's four hour work week dot com all spelled out. And just drop in your email and you will get the very next word. And if you sign up, I hope you enjoy it. This episode is brought to you by all four.


If you've been listening to this podcast for a while, you've probably heard me talk about you sleep and their mattresses, which I've been using since twenty seventeen. I have two of them upstairs from where I'm sitting at this moment. And now Helix has gone beyond the bedroom and started making sofas. They just launched a new company called All Form Alpha R.M. and they're making premium customizable sofas and chairs shipped right to your door at a fraction of the cost of traditional stores.


So I'm sitting in my living room right now and it's entirely all form furniture. I've got two chairs, I've got Ottoman and I have an L sectional couch. I'll come back to that. You can pick your fabric. They're all still stained and scratch resistant. The sofa color, the color of the legs, the sofa size, the shape to make sure it's perfect for you and your home. Also, all form arrives in just three to seven days and you can assemble it all yourself in a few minutes.


No tools needed. I was quite astonished by how modular and easy these things fit together. Kind of like Lego pieces. They've got armchairs, love seats all the way up to an Etsy section. Also, there's something for everyone. You can also start small and kind of build on top of it if you want to get a smaller couch and then build out on it, which is actually, in a way, what I did, because I can turn my L sectional couch into a normal straight couch and in a separate ottoman in a matter of about sixty seconds, it's pretty rad.


So I mentioned I have all these different things in this room. I use the natural like finish, which is their lightest color, and I dig it. And I've been using these things hours and hours and hours every single day. So I am using what I am sharing with you guys. And if getting a sofa without trying it instore sounds risky, you don't need to worry. All forms sofas are delivered directly to your home with fast free shipping and you get one hundred days to decide if you want to keep it.


That's more than three months and if you don't love it, they'll pick it up for free and give you a full refund. Your silver frame also has a forever warranty that's literally forever. So check it out. Take a look. They've got all sorts of stuff to choose from. I was skeptical and actually weren't. It worked much better than I could have imagined, and I'm very, very happy. So to find your perfect sofa, check out all


Tim That's a referendum. Tim All form is offering 20 percent off all orders to you and your listeners at all. Form dot com slash. Tim, make sure to use the code Tim at checkout. That's all for Kim Dotcom, Tim and his coach Tim at checkout. This episode is brought to you by picante. It's peculiar. I have had so much in my life. I've been to China, I've lived in China and Japan. I've done two tours.


I drink a lot of tea and 10 years plus of physical experimentation and tracking has shown me many things. Chief among them, gut health is critical to just about everything and you'll see where it is going to tie into this. It affects immune function, weight management, mental performance, emotional health, you name it. I've been drinking fermented poo, aatif specifically pretty much every day for years now. Who Aatif delivers more polyphenols and probiotics than you can shake a stick at.


It's like providing the optimal fertilizer to your microbiome. The problem with good care is that it's hard to source. It's hard to find real power that hasn't been exposed to pesticides and other nasties, which is super common. That's why Peake's fermented queer tea crystals have become my daily Gotha. It's so simple. They have so many benefits that I'm going to get into. And I first learned about them through my friends Dr Peter Attia and Kevin Rose. Peak crystals are called extracted, using only wild harvested leaves from 250 year old tea trees.


I often kick start my mornings with their pure green tea. They're poor black tea and I alternate between them to the rich. Earthy flavor of the black specifically is amazing. It's very, very it's like a delicious barnyard, very clean if you like whiskey and stuff like that. They triple tocsin screen all of their products for heavy metals, pesticides and toxic mold contaminants commonly found in tea. There's also zero prep for burring required as the crystals dissolve in seconds.


So you can just drop it into your hot tea. Or I also make iced tea and that saves a ton of time and hassle. So Peake is offering 50 percent off their to for the very first time. Exclusive to you, my listeners, this is a sweet offer. Simply visit peak tea dotcom slash tim. That's p q you e ey a dot com forward slash tim. This promotion is only available to listeners of this podcast. That's peak t dot com forward slash tim.


The discounts automatically apply when you use that URL. You also have a 30 day satisfaction guarantee your purchase is risk free. One more time. Check it out picante. That's peculiar to dotcom Tim.