Welcome to today's edition of the Rush Limbaugh Show podcast and greetings once again, everybody. Great to have you with us as we are revved and ready, locked and loaded and ready to go for three straight, busy broadcast hours here behind the Golden EIB microphone at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Studies, of all things that matter. It's great to have you with us. It always is.

And again today, ladies and gentlemen, I woke up and I thanked God that I did telephone number eight hundred two eight two two eight eight to the email address L Rumbo and I've EIB net. So this is how it happens.

Grab audio sound bite number one I want to take before playing the sound bite, I want to remind everybody I want to assure everybody I want to plaintively St.. To everybody that I have never told anyone not to evacuate from a wildfire.

I've never told anybody to stay there when a wildfire is about to destroy your home or wherever you happen to be, and I have I have barely even discussed hurricanes in this particular season. And I have yet to mention hurricanes, Ali. But that doesn't matter. Today on a podcast, our Tuesday, this was this Thursday, a couple of days ago on a podcast called Axios Today, and I know why they're doing they're doing this, so I will mention them.

Because when I mention them, all kinds of people will check it out when I mention something that expands the number of clicks, it expands the number of people to check something out. I happen to create interest in whatever it is that I mentioned. And so you might say, well, why are you mentioning these clowns? Because there's a larger concern here and is to illustrate for you how the left and the media literally is poisoning the minds. Of Americans touched on it many times, but specifically earlier in this busy broadcast week, so on Tuesday, Axios Today podcast, a segment on people refusing to evacuate for hurricanes and wildfires.

And frankly, I didn't even know that that was a big deal. I just, in fact, just read today that one of the big problems with people evacuating from the wildfires, you know what it is?

Looting. Bad guys are waiting and watching and noting who leaves their homes and are going in there and stealing everything from them. Yeah, I have it here in the stack. Ready to go anyway. Here is the audio from the Axios Today podcast.

We know our media diets can have an influence on who and what we trust, but now that even includes evacuation orders before a natural disaster, whether we're talking about a hurricane or a wildfire. That's what researchers at UCLA found in a study that looked at evacuation patterns of Floridians before Hurricane Irma in twenty seventeen.

They found that people who were in Trump heavy precincts were between 10 and 11 percent less likely to evacuate. They traced that back to messages coming from partisan media, people like Rush Limbaugh, who said that it was essentially something that was being hyped to make that connection between hurricanes and climate change.

Now, again, I have never told anybody not to evacuate. I've never told anybody not save their lives. I have said that these wildfires have nothing to do with man made climate change. They have everything to do with manmade irresponsibility. They have everything to do with a bunch of liberals refusing to clear out the fuel for these fires. But I have never told people not to get out of the way of an oncoming hurricane. That's that's life threatening or a fire.

And yet they trace this back. They found and people were trump heavy precincts between 10 and 11 percent less likely to evacuate. They traced that back. See, it's a poll, folks. It's a research study. They traced that back to messages coming from partisan media, people like Rush Limbaugh, who said that it was essentially something being hyped to make that connection between hurricanes and climate. So trying to say here that I'm actually in denial that the hurricane is a bad one because I don't believe in man made climate change.

They are lying through their teeth about this. These kids and axios. I don't even know if they know that they're lying or if they've just been using lousy data in from poisoned media prior to them. But see, this is exactly what they're doing to Donald Trump. That Charlottesville's story. He never said there weren't good people among the neo-Nazi skinheads. But yet, forty five percent of the people this country believe that he did and of has had a devastating effect.

You know, people don't like Nazis, people don't want Nazis to be in this country, they don't want them to be influential. They want them to be any kind of serious political element at all. And for the president of the United States to be saying, hey, there's some good people among those skinhead not he never said it, but for three years they have been saying that he said it.

And I'm telling you, it's making some people megalithic. It has gotten into their heads, particularly African-Americans. It has gotten into their hands that they believe it and folks they are destroying. The opportunity for a civil society, the media itself is keeping people at odds with each other roiled and ready to do battle, making it impossible for there to be peaceful coexistence.

And this is how they do it. Partisan media people like Rush Limbaugh said that it was essentially something that being hyped, in other words, I'm telling people, don't believe hurricane sallies or hurricane, don't believe it.

I never I haven't even talked about hurricanes, Ali. No, no, no, no, no, no. I'm not doing this to defend myself. I'm sure this is a this is a an object lesson. This is how it is done. And of course, axios using me to get mentions for their website. And I waited and I went back and forth. Should I even discuss this, knowing that that's one of their objectives. And I decided that the object lesson that this offered outweighed the the negative aspect of giving them a little bit of publicity in any way.

Where have you have you been Rachel Rachels in for Dawn today. Have you you've been with us for a couple of days this week. Have you been hearing discussions of masculinity on the radio lately? Yes, you have I have been discussing masculinity on this program in the past couple of days, you recall it, right? Made a big Mr. Sturdy. You remember this?

Yeah, I mean, it's it's it was a it was a chick application of America and how Trump is a very masculine guy. I had a piece yesterday by Mr. Alvarez in mind who thinks that African-American and Latino young men of color are going to respond favorably to masculinity because they're sick and tired of their masculinity being called toxic. My point is there isn't anywhere else on the radio or in media that anybody's talking about toxicity, sorry, masculinity, but me.

So whenever there's a story about masculinity out there, where do you think it emanated? And I have one here, Jason kicking it out kick, I think. I think that's the place that Jason Whitlock went to, to work, at any rate, the headline, like it or not, Return of Big Ten Football, A Win for Trump and Masculinity. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I always tell you that I'm on the cutting edge of societal evolution.

And therefore, if you listen regularly to this program, so shall you be on the cutting edge? So. I don't know who Jason King is, but the odds are, well, I'm not going to make any rash assumptions, but I don't know of too many places where masculinity being discussed positively, especially has been has. Oh, did you. Did you. So I was 14. Have you ever gotten around to it yet?

You you wanted to ask me here if there are or are there.

No, no there aren't any. From now on there are no problems with the install. It's clean, it's there's no bugs in it. It's actually one of the cleanest releases that they've had in a long time.

No, but my I knew what was going to happen. The changes that have been made in the widget area, you can't just tell people verbally how to do it. I have been recording instructional videos on my phone to show people what all can be done with the widgets now and how to do it, because you can't you can't just if you wanted to text them or send them an email, you'd be writing thousands of words and you'd still need to take screenshots and pictures out once you've taught them how to do it.

It's rather simple, but it is that first step of the learning curve. So that's why I turned on the Do Not Disturb yesterday. I didn't want to get hassled by anybody because I'm the go to guy in my familia and in my group of friends. Whenever anybody has a question, I'm the guy they call. So I turned on Do Not Disturb last night so it would be bugged by it. So I just wanted. I thought about putting some of the videos on the website, but they're my phone, I mean, bye bye privacy.

That's the see, that's the thing you people would not believe how my life has been so severely limited because of my I'm too famous. And so, yeah, I would love these videos would be great instructional videos to put on the website to show people how to do that. But it's my it's my phone that I use as my homepage. I didn't stop to think and do this on a dummy phone. I don't have a dummy phone anyway. Everyone a phone I uses got a purpose anyway.

Anyway, here is this, like it or not, return of Big Ten football, a win for Trump and masculinity. Now, isn't it interesting that masculinity would all of a sudden be a an ingredient in this in this story? And I'm not being critical of anybody here. Don't misunderstand. Donald Trump's biggest bet is on masculinity. That's how the story opened. Jason King it out kick masculinity is Trump's calling card. His defining characteristic is primary tool for re-election.

His opponents showcase their alleged empathy. President Trump highlights his masculinity. Masculinity is an aphrodisiac a reason to fall in love?

Yeah, well, it it might have been, but I know that may have been of a stretch now in certain circles to say that masculinity you get to white, young college graduate millennial women and they ain't anything aphrodisiac in nature about masculinity. They have been convinced that it is barbarism, that it is toxic. And they they want no part of it, and it's not it's really not new. And part of, you know, part of masculinity, masculinity is not just macho.

Masculinity is not is not just.

Outward displays of strength, masculinity can be expressed in any number of ways, and one of the ways that masculinity is expressed is in the area of confidence.

You know what I found over the course of my many years as a top ranked media figure, confidence really put some people off, especially for some reason millennial aged women.

If you are calm and I am so if you are confident and if you add bravado to the confidence, it turns some of them off because in their minds, nobody is supposed to be that sure of themselves.

And there's you can't say that what you think is right, there are so many possibilities, so if you are dead certain about something, if you are confident, if you are, just have no doubt whatsoever about what you believe.

It can offend people because they don't have that kind of confidence and they don't think that there are answers that are cut and dried on anything.

And that's because the whole notion of right and wrong has been so diluted and watered down. The attack on morality has been so successful that there are some people that just they they blanch and anybody that loves themselves is confident in what they believe. And that is Trump. Trump is very much.

Confident about what he believes and what he can what he can do, he's very confident about what he's going to do. He doesn't need a committee of people to help him come to a maybe decision. And that alone can be off-putting to some people, but I think it is part and parcel of masculinity. And it is it masculinities, I say it's not just brute strength or things that are macho masculinity is attitudinal as well. So Jason King here says Midwest people love football, a sport that rouses feelings of toughness, strength and power.

And that's why Wednesday's announcement that the Big Ten would indeed have a 2020 season wasn't just a win for college football fans, it's a victory for Trump. On Wednesday, the president made sure to remind everybody at two weeks ago, he called the Big Ten commissioner, Kevin Warren, to make the case. For the Big Ten to reverse its decision to cancel football season were completely dead in the water on August thirty first. Senior White House administration officials said that Trump gets on the phone, they change their mind.

I think also something that helped change her mind was the success of the NFL. And its its opening weekend, by the way, they have tested the players, the Chiefs and the Texans zero. Zero cases of covid-19 after the Thursday night game between Texas and the Chiefs, I got to take a break here. Hang on. We'll be right back.

And great to have you with us. Rush Limbaugh. Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day. Jobless claims were lower than expected by the employment. Growth is still sluggish. Let me translate this for you. Jobless claims lower than expected. That means Trump beat expectations again. And he's done this despite wildfires, hurricanes and Democrat governors and mayors deliberately tamping down their local economies. In an effort to hurt. The national economy in an effort to hurt Trump and the people who elected them, I mean, these people in these blue states are literally inflicting harm on their own voters.

First time claims for unemployment insurance beat Wall Street estimates last week as the US economy enters a critical new stage. Filings totaled eight hundred sixty thousand for the week.

And in September 12, economists had expected eight hundred seventy five thousand against the previous weeks, upwardly revised eight hundred ninety three thousand the beat.

The claims had little impact on financial markets. Wall Street opening sharply lower.

Yeah, well, that that will all straighten out.

The bottom line is that the job situation is better than people expected.

And if you go back to two thousand nineteen, we're getting some Census Bureau data. I mean, what what's it worth now? Well, it is worth something because it was Trump created and inspired household income before the before covid virus hit, before the China virus reached our shores. This economy was just trucking.

It was just rolling.

Household income was up seven percent. Poverty was at a record low.

In twenty nineteen, and then the bottom dropped out when they when the virus hit, Democrats are also scrambling on the covid-19 relief bill amid division and a Trump surprise.

It's it's. Greetings. Welcome back. I'm trying to remember some weeks ago now we have a story. It was a tweet from I can't remember who it was.

It might have been Mark Penn. It might have been some other Democrat. They were very, very worried that Black Lives Matter. Had gone from plus twenty five support, I think it was Michigan, but it might be Wisconsin Black Lives Matter had gone from plus twenty five support to zero. Now let me tell you how absurd this is. Black Lives Matter. Is a straight up Marxist, Leninist communist organization, it is not a civil rights organization in any way, shape, matter, form, not my opinion.

It's what they say about themselves on their own website. This is what makes so much of this mind boggling. The NFL, the NBA, Major League Baseball, professional sports, they've all thrown in with a communist organization and they know it. Many of them have thrown in with another communist organization would be China. And Black Lives Matter is not about anything to do with Martin Luther King, not about Selma.

It's not about any of the civil rights activities, slavery, none of that. It's flat out anticapitalism, full fledged pro communism. And their objective is to destroy the United States as currently structured.

So I oh, I found it fascinating. I'm like Black Lives Matter. You know, people go out and poll them and they were plus twenty five favorability. And you know, who gave them that favorability was white, millennial, college educated women.

White women who have been targeted in college and high school classrooms, they have been jilted like you can't believe into being responsible for all of the misfortune and the unfortunate things that have happened to African-Americans their whole lives. And they have accepted the blame. They've accepted the guilt, and they end up supporting Black Lives Matter and Antifa.

They have been reached through a high speed tunnel of emotion. They have not been appealed to via reason or intellect or anything of the sort. So Black Lives Matter was plus twenty five approval. I think it was Michigan or Wisconsin wanted to. Now, some weeks ago they had lost all their support. They were down to zero that the news today is support for Black Lives Matter has dropped 12 points overall, not just in one state but everywhere since June.

And this poll is from the Pew Research Center for People in the Press. And they say support for Black Lives Matter has dropped 12 points since June. Get this.

This is this is so this is maddening to me. Back in June.

Sixty seven percent of American adults said they supported the Black Lives Matter movement. What a dangerous, scary, embarrassing thing. Sixty seven percent. Now we have to allow. That a certain percentage of that 67 percent were just taking a path of least resistance when they answered. Phone rings Hi, we're from the you're a racist polling company, you support Black Lives Matter. Oh, yeah, absolutely. I mean, I've got Black Lives Matter signs in the front door.

Absolutely I do. OK, good. You're not a racist. Then hang up.

One of the no, I don't support Black Lives Matter, they're not really you don't? Well, somebody will be visiting your house maybe tonight. You might want to be on the lookout for that.

I think it may be some of that. But I think a lot of support from Black Lives Matter is simply the result of media disinformation, flat out lying.

And even despite that now Black Lives Matter support has dropped 12 points. It's not. It's still over 50 percent still. Fifty five percent. Of adults said they supported the racial justice movement, it's not racial and it's not justice, it's it is it is anti American. It's anti-American founding, it's anti capitalism, it's anti liberty and freedom is what Black Lives Matter is.

It ought to have whatever percentage of communists are in this country, 10 percent, they don't have no more than 10 percent support. Fifty five percent, that's still dangerously high, and it has to be that we just have a large percentage of our population is just ignorant. I'm not saying stupid or just ignorant. They just don't know. Let me get started on the phones. Mary Jo in Grand Rapids, Michigan, your first today, and it's great to have you.

Hi.

Hi, Rush. Thank you for having me. First of all, I want to tell you that I and my family have been praying for you. And when I first heard the news, I felt like I'd been socked in the gut. But I am just so encouraged every day when I hear your voice on the radio and I'm so thankful for it.

Thank you very much. I'm calling to say that four years ago I called you to say that for the first time since I turned 18, I was not going to vote for president. I thought I could not vote for Trump. I thought he lacked character. I believed he lacked principle. And I truly believe there was no way to trust a man who had recently changed so many political positions on so many issues. Shortly before running for president and in fact, I stopped listening to you for a while.

I didn't stop loving you, but I stopped listening to you for a while, probably a couple of years after he was elected. And I am a pro-life, classical liberal. I did not regret my decision. But after four years of the Trump administration and four years of the further ethical and moral degradation of the Democrat Party, I am voting for Trump in November and I can't wait to do so. And yesterday you were talking about these never Trump.

And I just want to say that judging from my own experience, people like Jennifer Rubin, other so-called conservatives, libertarians who say they continue and they're never Trump position, they are not truly what they claim to be. And only foolish pride and the inability to re-evaluate a position are at the root of this never trump movement among so-called conservatives.

Yeah, I agree. They're not. They have they never have been conservatives.

They never have. And the thing is, even liberal Trump over Trump is, like you said, are changing their mind as they see what's happening. And if anybody loves this country and has any understanding and appreciation of its foundation, there is no way they could vote for Joe Biden and Kamala here, because you're really not voting for Biden.

You're voting for people you don't know. You're voting for people that will not come out and identify themselves. You're voting for radical leftist Marxism is who you're voting for. Absolutely.

And you pointed out that so well yesterday. It's not a man. It's not a woman. It's a whole group. And it's a whole ideology. It's not a person.

So, Mary Jo, what changed your mind? You had to obviously have negatives on top of negatives about Trump. So it had to be it had to be something about the Democrats that has caused you to do the maybe I don't want to put words in your mouth. Maybe you've heard of a new different appreciation for Trump, given all the variables that are part of the mix now?

I do. I he he really proved himself on the pro-life issue. I think he was so strong. I, I really appreciate the things he said about people being made in the image of God, the creator, and I appreciate what he's done for our economy. Anybody with any brains has to see that he's done a great deal. And even in the midst of all that's happened with this covid-19, he he's done a great job. And I, I just I've really come to appreciate him by watching him and seeing what he does.

I don't appreciate his Twitter rants. There's a lot of things he says off the cuff that I think, oh, stop and think a little bit before you speak. But I think he's exactly what the country needed.

And he was I'd put him there. He was asked about that at this ABC Town Hall. And by the way, we're going to some tape of that coming up here. It was not a bunch of undecideds. It was a bunch of people who hate Trump, that ABC.

And he was asked about this, you know you know, presidential Trump's. I got more important. I got problems I got to solve. I got serious things that I have to fix that can't be fixed if all I'm going to do is act presidential. You know, there's there are things more and eventually said, go back and look at the people acted presidential, all of their presidencies and look at what they got done. And it isn't going to be much.

But they were respected. But he's genuinely oriented towards solving problems. He is genuinely oriented and aimed at fixing things. He loves the country and he wants to make it great and he wants it to sustain itself in its greatness. And that's more important to him. And having people approve of the way he acts under the guise of it being presidential and something else out there that Mary Jo, thanks for the for the call. I want to make an observation to you folks.

You know, one of the one of the criticisms for thirty two years about this program is that the people in this audience are a bunch of mind numbed robots and they don't know what to think until I tell them and they don't know how to vote until I tell them.

This has been a thirty two year insulting criticism of the people in the Saudis.

Did you hear what she said? She listened to this program. She listened to me for decades and Trump came along. I support Trump. I'm all in for Trump. She didn't want Trump. She didn't vote for Trump. And she turned this show off for two years. And then she kept paying attention, and after a while, she figured out that the real threat to this country is the American left and its home base, the Democrat Party. So now she's all in on Trump, not because I told her to be.

Not because I influenced her in any way, although I'm sure I did to a certain extent, but she came to her own conclusion about it.

Why, I've said the people in this audience are among the most politically informed and aware and sophisticated in this country. Anyway, we're going to have a couple of things we side by side comparison. We do this now and then a B side by side comparison. I'm going to show you the media softball questions that Biden gets versus the vicious. Rude town hall questions at Trump got you. Did you see Trump's presser yesterday at 5:00 in the afternoon?

A little after 5:00 o'clock?

My goodness, folks. The media in the White House press room was as rude as I have ever seen them be. It was maddening and infuriating. There was no respect, they were just flat out rude, they couldn't do 10 percent what Donald Trump has done in his life, and they're sitting in there acting like he has no business even being in the same room that they're in. Who the hell is he? What gives him the right to even freaking breathe?

I mean, it reached a new low, but he kept his cool during the whole thing. He didn't take the bait. I mean, he had some snarky reaction to them here and there. But, I mean, it was it was it was bad. And I just want to admit we're going to go back and play some audio of one of these undecideds at the ABC Town Hall, and you just draw your own conclusion over who's mean and who's rude.

You know, I had Trump doesn't act presidential. Well, these undecided voters didn't act like responsible American citizens. What is it that grants every citizen the right to act like a thug? Every citizen has the right to act like a scumbag. But Trump has to act presidential. He cannot tweet, he cannot do anything that allows anybody. He's got to be perfect at the people sitting in judgment of him apparently have the right.

To act out as human debris, they can be mean, they can be rude, they can be vicious and nobody criticizes them while sorry.

On this program, they're going to get called out and they're going to get criticized. Oh, I got to take a break. We'll be back. We will continue in mere moment. Don't go away.

OK, little Abe, side by side comparison, yesterday afternoon in Wilmington, Delaware. Here we have a Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, talking about covid-19 vaccine development. After his remarks, he took questions supposedly. And we have a montage of those questions from ABC, CBS, CNN and Delaware Online. That's where the reporters are from.

Thank you, Mr. Vice President. You just said that when it comes to a vaccine, you don't trust Donald Trump. Is there a risk that that message, that questioning the president on a vaccine could prevent people from trusting the science from trusting a vaccine when there finally is one?

Thank you, Mr. Vice President. You say that you don't trust the president. Does that mean you also don't trust the CDC and the FDA? In polling, we see time and again that President Trump has an edge over you on the economy.

Why do you think that is? Thanks, Mr. Vice President.

You've previously called for a massive mandate, a national mask mandate. If you were elected, what steps would you take to put that in place?

And how would that work? Sir, in terms of the distribution of the various communities of color have been greatly affected. Would they get access to the virus first?

So there you have the questions. And Biden was asked and of course, his answers are written for him. They show up on the prompter here Tuesday night, ABC Town Hall, the president and the people. A montage of questions from supposedly undecided voters assembled by George Stephanopoulos.

Did you throw vulnerable people like me under the bus?

Why don't you wear a mask? Why would you downplay a pandemic? When has America been great for African-Americans in the ghetto of America? Are you aware how tone deaf that comes off? Some have called your behavior not presidential.

Regarding your recent comments about our United States soldiers and referring to them as suckers should preexisting conditions which Obamacare brought into and brought to fruition be removed?

No. With that, please stop and let me finish my question. I'm a black woman and in the medical community, I'm minimized and not taken seriously. I want to know when you are going to do about that.

So this undecided voter grab, do we have time? Yeah. This undecided voter you just heard shows up on CNN and says that she's now decided I'm 57 years old. I've been a dedicated voter since I was 18 years old. And what have I ever achieved or gained from it? Nothing. I don't care if it was a Democrat or Republican. Obama, it doesn't matter. I really did not gain much, if anything, from their presidency. So what is the point?

And that's where I was until I got home last night. Right.

I'm voting for Biden and Harris or Harris and Biden or whoever comes first in her mind on the ticket. Man, I'll tell you what, these these hours they just zoomed by already have the first hour in the can. So we got to take a little break here at the top of the hour. We'll do that. We'll come back and we will resume our jampacked fastest three hours in media program before you know it.

Don't go anywhere.

And once again, greetings to you. Music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists across the mountain from fruited plain.

I am America's real anchorman, America's truth detector and the doctor of democracy.

Rush Limbaugh executing a signed host duties of flawlessly zero mistakes. Great to have you here, the telephone number if you want to be on the program. Eight hundred two eight two two eight eight two. And the email address, L Rushworth. I've been at that us so the past couple of days.

I have engaged in open conversation about what is at stake in the upcoming election.

Not everybody says that every election, the most important election in history, this one certainly.

Shaping up to be just that, I'm really, really concerned that if we lose this, that we are.

We're on the path to one party rule, one party country, much like California is much like New York is much like in the western half a state of Washington is.

And I think that one of the reasons for it is that the left, if they win this election, are going to see to it that that is the case.

I've I've maintained for a long time the one thing they don't control. That they have to do in order to get power in the United States is win elections and they hate the folks, I'm telling you they resent it. They resent that they have to go through the demeaning process of elections, what's demeaning about it, why they shouldn't be subject to what you think. Their claim to power is absolute, it shouldn't depend on whether you approve of it or not.

They resent the hell out of having the campaign, they don't care whether you agree with them or not, they don't want your opinion to matter. They want power and they want to be able to control your life, whether you agree with what they think and do or not.

Now, so far, elections matter, but look at what they've done with the last one. 2016, they simply refused to accept it. That's why we're going through what we're going through.

And if they had their druthers, they would make sure that no election ever again mattered. So what could they do? To ensure that no election down the road is ever going to matter. That essentially there was no way they could lose. The next election. Well, there's any number of things they could do. Let's say. And these are not out of the realm of possibility, let's say they win the White House in this upcoming election and let's say they win the Senate, that means they would have it all.

And with John Roberts at the Supreme Court, they would have all three branches.

And what's going to happen for years? How are we going to win in four years? What are they going to do in the next four years to make sure that what we do is irrelevant?

Well, grant statehood to prep the RICO and the state and then Washington, D.C. for brand new Democrat senators. Next thing they will do is get rid of the filibuster in the Senate, which means say goodbye to needing 60 votes to do anything. All you need is 51. So for new permanent Democrat senators from D.C., the Republicans don't exist there. And and two permanent senators from Puerto Rico, the Republicans don't exist. They're added to whatever number they're going to have minus the filibuster and they run the Senate.

That means. That whatever the president wants or whoever is running the country is go to the Senate and have a rubber stamp, go to the House, have rubber stamped.

Nothing the Republicans can do to stop it, so get rid of the filibuster, which means the Senate is no different than the House of Representatives, 51 votes, their simple majority will accomplish whatever they want. Then they're going to stack the Supreme Court. Let's say they they can do it, Congress structures the court, the Democrat Congress, Republican Congress can add to the number of Supreme Court justices any time they want. FDR tried to pack the court back in the in the 30s and got caught doing it.

Nobody was in favor of it back then. We're a different country. But you give them for let's say we go from nine to 13 or 14 justices. And if they win this election, every new justice is going to be a liberal Democrat.

Now you can say goodbye to the Republicans ever prevailing in a Supreme Court decision. Then they start appointing justice or judges to the district courts as they come up, and there's not a thing the Republicans can do to stop the takeover of the judiciary, which is already well under way.

So they've they've just essentially. Locked up for four years, everything this government is going to do, and so the next time there's a presidential election in four years, the Republican is not going to matter. Just like whoever runs for governor on the Republican side in California, it doesn't matter. So it's a very real possibility.

And we had some calls yesterday, Russia won't work because they're going to destroy the economy and people are going to stand up and vote them out, no, that's part and parcel of this is to make sure things like that don't happen.

It's it's hard to explain some of this because people a lot of reasonable people just can't get their arms around. The idea of of elections not mattering and they and a lot of people can't accept what I'm saying about the modern iteration Democrat Party anyway, which wants to find a way around the meaningfulness of elections. Why? What's stopping them if they get everything I've just described? If they run the house, if they run the Senate, if they have the White House, if they are in charge of the judiciary, what's to stop them from changing the Electoral College or getting rid of it?

Let's say they just decide to get rid of it, there's nothing we can do to stop them. If sheer numbers are all that matters, we won't have the votes anywhere to stop them. Get rid of the Electoral College and that means the popular vote is all that matters. And folks, that's they win the presidency with New York and California. Don't even need the other 48 states. And believe me, they are salivating over these possibilities. They resent the idea of being judged by voters.

You don't think that's true, they're burning down the houses and the private property of people who are on their side in Portland and in the state of Washington, in Minneapolis, in New York, in Chicago. These very people about whom I'm speaking are destroying and torching the homes, the businesses, the dreams, the private property of the voters that do elect them. The governors and the mayors are standing aside while all of this destruction and violence happens. They are permitting it under the theory that this is how they get rid of Trump, they make the economy so bad that people blame Trump for everything that's going wrong and they try to create as much going wrong as they can, hoping that the guy in charge at the time, at the moment, Donald Trump, will get the blame for it.

They don't even care what people on their own side think of them. Look at this mayor in Portland, Ted Wheeler. This guy is an actual sycophant. This guy is a groupie of Black Lives Matter. And Antifa, he wants to march with them, he showed up one night, demarked, they tear gassed him, then they went after the condo building where he lives, forced him out of it so that the other residents of the building would be safe.

He still loves them. Even though they've rejected him and they've tried to harm him and they have done everything they can to disrespect him and he's on their side.

I think the left is conditioning the people in this country. For this ongoing violence after the election, they were out there attacking Bill Barr, we'll have the audio bar.

Was it rare form at Hillsdale College this week?

We're going to have the audio sound bites of that in mere moments. Plus, I'm going to be getting back to your phone calls first. So if you're online, if you're on hold out there, please hang on.

We're getting obscure poll numbers. To fuel the left claims that the right wing is cheating, yeah, the poll numbers are starting to tighten now.

In fact, story here. This is from Politico. Democrats fear Wisconsin governor's becoming a liability for Biden.

The current governor of Wisconsin looks like a well, his own party's mad at him because he's such a wimp. His name is Tony Heavers. And they're just they're not happy. And in Wisconsin, this is not Wisconsin, it's let's see what else.

So they're starting to get dayjob.

Vu in Michigan, you know, where Trump barely eked out a win because Hillary didn't campaign there. Biden's not going to Michigan. They're starting to get worried. The polling is narrowing. And some of the polling is obscure, but it's still being reported, and the reason it is is because it is designed to penetrate. The minds of the dullards that make up Democrat voters, they are being conditioned. That Trump is cheating again, that Trump is meddling in the election.

Look, they've been told all year, right? Biden in a landslide by the by eight. Biden by 12. Biden's up by 10. Biden's running away with it now all of a sudden.

Oh, it may be in doubt. Oh, it may not be a slam dunk. They're setting it up so that these idiot Democrat voters are being conditioned now to believe. At this election's being stolen from the right out from under their noses. This is all, I think, to stoke the fires and the flames of violence. They're justifying the rioting. They've been talking about the perfect storm for months, they've been saying neither side is going to accept the results.

They have been saying that they'd better win in a landslide or else there's going to be out of control about it. We won't know who won four weeks.

I mean, this is it's a perfect storm that they are trying to set up here. They are hell bent on winning this, and if they don't, they are setting everybody up for a. Outbreak of violence. That they are trying to say is to be justified, it's going to be explained by the fact Republicans and Trump are cheating again, Mark, by now, don't let any of this affect you. The way to defeat all this is to show up on Election Day and vote, show up in record numbers, do not like any of these threats.

Stand in your way. It doesn't have to be we don't have to lose and we don't have to lose the two party system, it doesn't have to be. I'm just describing for you what the left wants, what they are attempting to achieve, and if they win this election, how relatively simple it will be. To get rid of any serious opposition. I got to take a brief break. We will take that break and come back right after we get started.

Back on the phones. Be back. Before you know it, all right, we are back and as promised and as committed to, we go to the phones.

Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, this is Patricia and I'm glad you're here.

Welcome. Yes, Rush, mega megadose, mega prayers and basically a life for my father turned me on to you in 1988 on the first time caller I love 1988.

You are a lifer. You've been here since the beginning.

Yes, my father I always said my father introduced me to the two best things in life. Yes. Oh, are we losing that connection?

Oh, can you hear me?

Last I heard you say two best things in life. You end and then.

OK, well, I was I was saying God did with the way you say God, that's why.

Oh yes. Well, that's out of respect. That is out of total full fledged respect.

Absolutely. Absolutely. OK, but I'll get right to the point here. You talk about the white millennials, the whites, you know, these these gals stirring up the trouble. And I think in my heart of hearts, they are not nurturers. We have been nurturing out of our young women. Nurturing is a dirty word and it's our society in general. It's the school system nurturing, whether it's whatever in whatever form it takes. It's just it's not it's it's it's a dirty word.

It's not looked upon.

And, you know, that's that's that's true. Nurturing. Oh, that the feminists, they literally despise that word.

Exactly. And you want to know something. They you know, these girls get out of school at a college and I've talked to some of them. Oh, I want to make a difference. I want to change the world, those kind of stuff. But the last thing on their minds is the marriage, children, raising a family, creating a whole. These are just things that like, well, I'll tell you why you want it.

It says up here that you want it. You know what's going on with these women, that they have been affected by so much.

They've been affected by modern era feminism, which can be traced back to the origins. I first became aware of it. I was first confronted by it in nineteen sixty eight. I was 17 years old and I was working on the radio every afternoon after school and because of.

FCC regulations at the time, you had to do certain things on the air in the community to maintain your broadcast license with the federal government, so that meant a lot of community service programming, a bunch of dull, boring stuff that you put on the air at 7:00 a.m. on Sunday when everybody's in better on the way to church, although you don't put it on, anybody's going to actually hear it because nobody's going to want to listen to it. And I had to host those discussions.

And I'll never forget, women from my high school were arranged as guests and they came on and they started I mean, they were mad not at me specifically, but mad at me generically. On behalf of what was then called women's liberation. And I'm listening to this and in in my world, the way I looked at the world when I was 17, women called the shots, women ran the world.

I think they still do, I think the power has always resided with women in a civilized society. And I want you to listen to me. If I don't know, please don't have a knee jerk reaction, because I'm not I'm not trying to cause one and I'm not trying to be funny in a civilized society.

And I realize not not all of our society is. I mean, we've got rapists and muggers and we get generally bad people out there. But in the civilized elements of our society, women have the ultimate. Power because they have the power to say no. Or yes, but they have the power to say, and I never understood. And then when I watched women's liberation become feminism.

I saw the anger and I saw the rage and I saw what they wanted to do to try to rectify it, and what I saw, what I witnessed was women.

Not seeking emancipation or power for themselves, they wanted what men had, what they thought men had, they wanted to join men's groups. They wanted to join all men's groups that were exclusively male, being a country club, being a social organization. They wanted to be able to dress like men. We're dressing. It was it was almost a little bit of a jealousy. And then, of course, it just totally lost control when these feminist professors got hold of the curriculum on various college campuses, that that was the end of it.

And these women had been indoctrinated with a bunch of genuine hate, hate for America, hate for men who are their natural oppressors.

We had law professors in your book. Take a break. Catharine MacKinnon, story coming up.

Never forget, in the 1990s, a professor of law at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Her name was Katherine McKinnon. She was a highly reputed lawyer. If this was a woman, was not a fringe figure. This this woman was considered mainstream. She taught the women in her classes. That all sex was rape. Especially the sex in marriage, all sex is rape that men are incapable of not raping.

Now, if you're a young, impressionable woman and you're feeling your oats and you you think you're on the cutting edge and you're being given a brand new curriculum stuff, that's that that that's earth shattering and then blowing up all the old conventional wisdom, you're going to just you're going to glom onto that.

And they did. And they were turned into raging angry young women. And they still to this day haven't gotten over it.

I know a lot of them haven't. I don't want to recount here the entire feminist movement.

I could I could start right now and not repeat myself in the next 90 minutes in recounting various stages of all of this.

But specifically, the question was from the caller, what is happening? These young, millennial, white, millennial college graduate women, white, why are they so into Black Lives Matter?

Folks, I can't describe for you the guilt trip that they have had ladled on them and it just intensified once they got to higher education. But starting in middle school, junior high high school, they have been told that white people in general are despicable, that white supremacy, that white superiority, that white privilege is why there is such misery and inequality and injustice in the country. The they have been lied to about the founding. They've been lied to about the the slavery era.

They have been lied to about the Civil Rights Coalition as it's currently built and as it currently functions. They've just they've just been infuriated. They've been enraged and they think they're the only ones who get it. And it's it couldn't have happened if there hadn't been the the baseline foundation of feminism for the past 30 years. Twenty five years on which all of this current white supremacy and. All these other horrible things are built on the foundation of feminism that they have been subjected to as part of their college education, and it's not just one campus, it's throughout the entire upper tier, including the Ivy League.

And it is. It was very seductive. I mean, I women my age glommed onto this stuff, you know, and I'm in my early 20s and it was it was it was a confusing time for my men didn't know how to act. Women didn't know how to act. Everybody is acting the way they thought they had to act just to get along. So nobody was being real. Some of that has has maintained itself, but the politicization and that's the corruption of virtually everything in the American cultural structure, the way we get along with each other, that's been corruption.

That's been politicized. And it has led to them believing that people like Donald Trump are the scourge of the earth, but masculinity is toxic. That confidence and self-assurance is unreal, that it's dangerous. Anyway, I could go on, let me let me grab another call, Lubbock, Texas, Amy, glad you waited. You're up next. And it's great to have you here. Hello.

Hi, Rose. Thank you so much. Mega prayers, love and respect to you. I like your other call your caller. Just before I started listening to you in 9th, around 1988 with my dad, my strong, manly dad and and I come to you with a little bit of a flip side of raising young men. I have a 15, 18 and 20 year old and their generation have battled it since birth of the the masculinization. And I believe truly that feminism is one of the most destructive things to our relationship and that our young men and men in general are raising them.

I want them to know it's God's design. Be confident, be strong, your protector, your leaders, and that's OK. And women like that. And that's OK. I remember about a year ago maybe or so you read a statistic that struck me about millennial women marrying older men. And for me, it was a light bulb, like, of course, because they're looking for masculine men, like they don't have that in their generation because it's been stripped.

It has it has been stripped out of their own age group. It's been stripped down of their generations. It's been it's been whittled away.

Right. And I like my husband and I have just really tried desperately to instill in our kids, our boys that that's not right. That's not God's design like you are to be confident and strong and leaders and protectors and that that is really OK and that women, women that will matter in life will gravitate to that.

Well, that that has that has this is used to be. That used to be true. Don't get mad at me, folks. It used to be true. Well, I that's it's it's not universally true anymore.

There's there's there's a there's a no there's an ongoing effort that is aimed aimed at women to try to deprogram them from any of that kind. You don't want your relationship to define you. You don't want your husband or your boyfriend to define. You don't even want to need one. You don't you know, you don't want your happiness to derive from any of that. And you certainly are not on Earth. In order to promote masculine men by choosing them and marrying them, they are to be impugned, they are to be driven out of our society, masculine, confident.

Men with assuredness of their own existence and men who like themselves are to be deemphasized, so forth, it's it's it's a hideous thing.

It is one of the main reasons why Trump is so despised by the people we're talking about here.

Graham, but thank thanks for the call. Amy, grab something. Number twenty four yesterday, remember, I shared with you a excerpts of a column in USA Today written by Christine Brennan. She used the sportswriter and she used to be The Washington Post. She is live in that. The Big Ten changed his mind.

And I remember I made the observation that the sports right, particularly women sportswriters, it seems like so many of them don't even like sports.

They they blame sports for creating these characteristics in men that everybody should be afraid of the toxic masculinity, the brute force, the barbarism, the mean spiritedness, the aggression, all of these things that we're trying to program out of young boys and men and women.

The Big Ten reversed itself. She was fit to be tied and blame Trump for it. We have audio sound bite here from CNN NEWSROOM today. John King speaking with USA Today columnist Christine Brennan questioned you call it the trumpeting of the big. Can you see the president's thumb on the idea?

And the president sees the president's thumb on this, John. As we know, there was an off the record briefing yesterday about this. So he's taking a victory lap, whether it means anything in terms of votes that he desperately needs in Michigan or Ohio or Wisconsin or Pennsylvania. We'll see. But again, there are adults in the room and that the president said the Big Ten schools. And that's the decision the Big Ten made to go for football as opposed to being correct and sitting back and watching some of the problems elsewhere and saying, hey, we made the right decision.

We did not roll the dice.

Does anybody know what her point there is and what she's saying? All I know is that she's mad that the Big Ten changed its mind. She's upset they're going to play football. She would, rather than not blaming Trump for it, she alluded to something here that is interesting, whether it means anything in terms of votes that he desperately needs in Michigan or Ohio or Wisconsin. See this. Donald Trump believes in American traditions. He believes that there are things.

These institutions, which uniquely, exclusively define America, which create the entire combination of things that equal American greatness, American exceptionalism and laugh, if you will, but he believes college athletics is one of those great traditions. He believes the NFL, Major League Baseball, professional sports is another. It's merit based. It is it is it is individuality. It requires teamwork and rugged individualism at the same time, but more than that. Donald Trump is not doing this for votes.

Yeah, the Big Ten does have some states that he needs, but that's not why he thinks the Big Ten out of play. He thinks they ought to play because this is the United States of America and we don't cower in the corner. We do not shift away and start acting like we are afraid of life. We do not fear living. We adapt. We show the rest of the world how to adapt. The institution of college football, there's a lot riding on it, so many young men's futures are tied into it.

Financial independence and health of the universities are tied into it. Some people may disagree with the way the financial aspect of all this is structured, but still it is a relevant factor and just shut it down for a year. Because fear seems to be the proper response. That's not who we are. The millennials need to learn this, this is not how America became what it is. And there's a lot riding on this, these people that would be forced to miss this year of college football is not just college players that might be good enough to maybe get drafted or chosen to play in the National Football League.

It is these kids have a finite number of years that they are athletically capable of excelling at the top tiers they do and just have a year of that taken from them. The year they can't get back is is senseless. But really, I don't know if is going to benefit from this politically. The some of the states in the Big Ten are states that he needs to win, but I don't believe that's what is in his mind.

I think people just can't understand it, no matter how hard, how hard they try. Loving America is not that tough to figure out, but he does and he's proud of it. And he thinks these traditions that have defined this country are worth preserving and continuing.

That's really all this is anyway, celebrating the flag before NFL games. It's worthy of preserving. It shouldn't become. An opportunity to rip your country to shreds. Do that somewhere else anyway. I got to take a break. I'm way long here, so back in a second.

OK, we have time to squeeze in another call. This is Paul in Greensboro, Georgia. I'm glad you waited. It's great to have you here with us. Hello.

Hi, Roger. Thanks so much. You're in my prayers, by the way, Rush. Two nights ago, Tucker Carlson had a scientist who worked in the lab in China, and she basically stated that that this virus was a designed virus. It was not something that was in nature. And I wanted to talk about that. And I don't want to go with the obvious where that, you know, Google, Google, Facebook and Twitter censored her.

But there's two things very interesting about that interview. One, she didn't have an answer as to why they would be creating the virus. And the other thing is Tulku didn't really think about the deeper ramifications if what she's saying is true. The one thing that I'll be very quick to I think it's very obvious. It's a it's a country that has one point four billion people to feed and it's struggling to do that. All this urbanization that you see taking place every place in both China and India is just really another source for the irrigation that comes out of the Himalayan mountains.

And China is on a buying binge across the globe, buying land across the globe. So I think there's an obvious answer to the lie. But the deeper question also is. If that's true, what the hell else is going on in that lab, if they can create a very specific virus that's tailored to the old the people that are weak, that have pre-existing conditions? What else are they working on there? Suppose we get a vaccine which are going to have very well, I don't think it's this.

I don't think it's like it's that complicated. And I don't think there needs to be this much intrigue about if what she said is true. I saw her interview. I fully expect this woman to be disappeared very shortly.

The child comes a find a way to find out where she is, I'm I'm stunned she got out of China. It was thought that she had been disappeared months ago. No, I don't mean to be dismissive here, I just think that that the trichomes and the Russians and the US, we are working on the old name for this germ warfare. We are constantly working on bio warfare. The fact that the Chinese would be doing this is not a surprise.

The fact that they might use it as a way to eliminate some of their own population because they can't feed them all and they can't keep them all in the countryside and out of the cities.

They're communists. Communists kill their own people. None of that would surprise me if that's what's going on. The why of this, if this Chinese scientist is right, is not hard to understand at all. The.

The more troubling aspect here is the reluctance of people who otherwise have common sense to reject this out of hand.

As an impossibility, the second of three busy broadcast hours today and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network hosted by me, Your Guiding Light, we'll be back here after just a short little time out here at the top and we will continue.

You don't want to miss anything.

OK, I've held off. I've held off until the third hour of the program to stick to the issues. Crowd is very, very oriented towards sticking to the issues. Like if I had spent some time today talking about the U.S. Open, which starts today, started today, it's underway at Winged Foot. I'm sure I would have been ripped a new one. But ever since I said yesterday that I was going to turn on do not disturb on my iPhone so that nobody could bother me.

With with questions about the new iOS 14 that dropped yesterday for iPad and iPhone I, my email is overrun. So rush of people asking you, what's the big problem? Is it is it work? I've had so many questions about this that I'm almost duty bound to answer some of them, and I want to take as little time as I can.

One of the questions that I got from people who were very much aware of when I was 14 is I mean, here's the great thing about iOS 14. If you don't want your phone to change and if you don't want the look of it to change, if you don't want the way it functions to change, then it doesn't have to. You can use some of the new features that do not alter the appearance or the operation of the phone whatsoever. It's actually brilliant in that regard.

A lot of people with tech devices don't like any change. Once they figure out how it works, they want it to not change other people. And I'm one of the other people. Other people want change all the time. I want innovation. I don't want to have to wait until September every year for a bunch of new features. I can every week would be good with me.

But the point is, this is the the first iOS update where both. Characteristics are met if you don't care about widgets and if you don't want to get to get up to speed on how they operate and if you don't want to use them and if you don't want to have to figure it all out, you don't have to. And you can use your phone and and nothing is lost. If you do want to get to know widgets, if you do want to learn what they are all about, what this is all about, you can do that to.

So I've had people on the latter side who are curious about it, ask me various things of what I think of it and. I have to tell you that if you if you want to learn and it's tough when you start singling one company out or one developer or one anybody, when when the industry is made up of millions of people involved in it, it's kind of it's kind of dicey, but.

There is a developer out there who has and I'm sure a lot of folks are going to get up to speed very soon, but the guy that does carrott whether. For iPhone and iPad and the Apple Watch, this guy. Is getting more out of what is iOS 14 offers than any developer, yet now others are going to get up to speed and he's not going to be alone for very long.

But Carrette, whether there's so many different weather apps and if you're like me, you have four or five of them because they all offer a different look, they all have different data sources. They all have different graphical interfaces. And you want flexibility. But Carrott has ever listen to this. They are 12 widgets. That you can change every aspect of twenty five Apple Watch complications, different aspects of it, whether you can put on the any of the watch faces that you use.

There are different personality types, whether was known because it was the first app that talked back to you in a snarky way, made fun of you. You can turn that off and strictly have what's called a professional setting. And just the facts. Ma'am, I don't care about the humor and I don't care about the snark.

There are any number of data sources you can select, Dark Sky, you can select. I think Accu Weather is one. There's four or five different sources. The graphics in incorrect weather are unique as well. But I put together an instructional video today for I told you earlier, for friends of mine to show them what you can do, how to set up a stack of widgets and how to put them where you want them to be. And I chose Carrott Weather as the app that I would use to demonstrate what all is possible and and how to do it, you can change the colour of the widget to match your wallpaper.

You can add various layers of information. There's weather radar, weather map that you can put. You can stack as many as well. I do four, but you can put even more than you have a stack of widgets in one space that you just cycle through that you're not taking up space on your on your home page for each widget because they stack. That's not exclusive to Carrott. That's exclusive to the operating system. But one of my stacks for weather is this is the overall long range forecast and the hourly forecast and the daily forecast and then the weather radar page, the map page and you cycle through these things and they come in three different sizes, can take up as much space or as little space you want.

You could put them on the right side of their file. You could put them on the home page side wherever you want to put them in both. And this is what I was describing this earlier. Certainly when you want to put this video on the website so people can see what you're talking, I said, well, I, I could have if I had not done this on my phone. But I'm just I'm just telling you that and this is this is not to be critical or disparaging of any other developer.

The guy that does drafts, which is a fabulous app, also has some really creative uses with with with his widgets.

Some are minimalist and some are trying to get the most that the system and apple permit and carrot carrot whether if you if you want to be able to put the widget potential and possibility through its paces.

Right now, carrot weather is the app and it's it know it's a free app with three different subscription tiers, tier one and tier two. Tier three is a powerful, influential member of the media. I am tier three and yes, I pay for it. But that that gets you everything and it offers. But but Carrot will will bring you up to speed on virtually anything you can do that is new regarding widgets in iOS 14. Then you move over to watch twenty five different Apple Watch complications, meaning you have your watch face, you can put the humidity in one corner, you can put the current temperature in Fahrenheit or Celsius.

In another corner you can have the text of the weather in another face that is on the inside. Dial it. Twenty five different ways to experience the weather. This guy that does current has put so much work into this and it's it's just obvious.

So that's why I focus on it, because it's the one app that I have anyway, where you can get the max out of what Apple's trying to do here.

But it still is amazing that they have introduced an operating system that if you don't want to do it, is widget stuff you don't have to and your phone doesn't change and you're not missing anything, not forcing you to do this, to learn this, to figure it all out. It's only for people who care to and who want to.

So that's my attempt to answer all of the various email questions I got about this overnight.

Now, Jill Biden, you know, she's the she's the wife of Plug's. Joe Biden says that voting. We'll make the pandemic go away, and when I saw this, I saw this this has to be this is a satire. This is a spoof.

The Biden campaign wouldn't be this serious. They wouldn't they wouldn't blow their cover like this. I checked it out and it's real. It's on the Democrat Twitter feed. It was put up about two o'clock yesterday afternoon. Dr. Jill Biden, a Democrat presidential nominee, wife of the nominee, has claimed that voting will make the pandemic go away. Now, obviously, that can't be true. Voting is not how it's going to go away. But the censors on Twitter have allowed.

What she said here to stand it hasn't been taken down. Now, you talk about. I don't I don't know. I don't know the language here, I don't do Twitter, and so I don't know what happens when they take it down or don't take it down with the language for it is.

But they've left this up. The Twitter censors have allowed her message to stay up there. Meanwhile, Donald Trump will put up a tweet that's nothing but funny and they'll tear it down, claiming it's misrepresenting, misleading or that it's factually incorrect. Here's here's what a tweet says. If you want change in your life, if you want this pandemic to go away so that you can go back to school and back to work and have good health, you have to vote.

It's crucial. Now, come on. Everybody and their uncle knows that the very act of people going out and voting is going to have nothing to do with the pandemic one way or the other. And yet Twitter leaves this up. The wife of the nominee says voting will make the pandemic go away, it's another way of saying that after the election, the pandemic in many big deal.

And there are people who have said that there are a lot of people who think that come November 4th. That all of this interest in the pandemic is just going to evaporate, especially if Biden wins, if Biden wins, then what pandemic? There won't be any news about a pandemic. There won't be any news about anything bad except that news which can be tied to to Trump. But if if something was ever clearly incorrect and irresponsible, it's this. You have to vote, it's crucial if you want this pandemic to go away so that you can go back to school and back to work, you have to vote.

Now, my friends, you and I both know that the act of voting will have literally nothing to do with the status of the pandemic or of the virus. So what is Jill Biden actually saying? You know, I'm I'm working. Remember, Operation Chaos, Operation Chaos, so, so bothered the Democrats.

They made a movie about it, The Ides of March or The Ides of Something. I want Operation Chaos was this is 2008 and the Republicans had chosen McCain and the Republican primary fight was over, a nomination fight was there was no drama in it, and it was over in March or April, maybe even sooner. So I said to myself this this isn't good. And Obama was getting close to wrapping up the Democrat nomination versus the Hildur beast, and I said, well, this this isn't any good.

We've got to keep we've got to keep the Democratic primary going, we need to keep some drama out there and then have a little fun with it same time.

So I, I and I alone created Operation Chaos.

Operation Chaos was very simple. Republicans. In Democrat states, Democrat states where the Democrat primary was still up for grabs. Republicans were to either register as Democrats or independents or do what it was necessary to do to vote in the Democrat primaries in these states.

And my suggestion was that they vote for Hillary. Just to keep the race going, it looked like Obama was going to win a slam dunk and we didn't want that to happen too soon, there wouldn't be anything to talk about.

No drama. Operation Chaos might have actually worked in a couple of states.

And Hillary Clinton was running around telling me, you better be careful what you wish for, Rush. I mean, you may you may succeed here. I may end up getting a nomination, which is something you don't want.

And I said, well, at this stage, I don't care who gets it. I just don't want it to end yet. And it didn't and it went on all the way until June, and they had to involve the superdelegates. So I've been thinking. Here we are, forty seven days away. Forty six, whatever the number is from the twenty election. And it's not that I want to recreate. Operation Chaos just for doing it. But I've been looking at various ways.

To do a second version of it, because it's necessary and I'm toying with a couple of things and I'm on the verge, not today, but I just want you know, I'm on the verge of announcing what I think it's going to be. I haven't got a name for it yet, but it is going to involve every one of you doing something.

It isn't going to require you because who can do that, but I'm going to ask each and every one of you to do. Something that could be simple or it may be very hard, it depends on the people, you know.

Now, it will be compared by the Democrats on the left who are going to be very upset about this, if I ever announce it will be very upset about it.

They're going to accuse me of trying to revamp and reignite and relive Operation Chaos. But it will not be that it will have a specific objective. And the objective will have nothing to do with the objective of Operation Chaos, Operation Chaos objective was to prolong the Democrat fight.

By making sure that Obama didn't win it in April or March, that it would go on and on, hopefully until the convention and we almost pulled that off, we almost got there.

Got to take a quick time out. We'll do that. We'll be back and continue with much more right after this rush.

I don't care about widgets. I have never knowingly used a widget in my life. That's that's great. That's fine. That's one of the great things about Iowa sportin. If you don't care about widgets, you don't have to know a damn thing about them. It will not affect the operation of your phone at all. There are still all kinds of other new things in it that you can use, that you can learn to love, but you don't have to know a damn thing about widgets.

Most most companies would make you. They would force you. To learn how to use widgets if they wanted to emphasize them, but Apple has recognized that there are a bunch of different personalities. People use iPhones, don't want any change or want constant change.

I think it's actually kind of corporately brilliant the way they have structured this.

Anyway, let me grab Jerry in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. It's great to have you on the EIB Network.

Hello. Hey, Ross, first to you. Just wanted to say to you before I start, you've been really an inspiration for me. I've had some family members go through some sicknesses similar to what you are going through right now, just the way that you kind of fight through it and push it to the side and just keep pushing on with your normal life has been a real inspiration to me. So thank you.

I appreciate that. Thank you very much, sir.

So I'll get right to the point then. I was just calling. I'm sure you've heard about the shooting of a black man in Lancaster that sparked a bunch of protests. If you didn't was a black man that chased a police officer with a knife held over his head like he was ready to stab the officer. The officer turned in and shot him and killed him. And this sparked a bunch of protests. But my main point in saying this is just that I think there's two ways that the Democrats really tried to control the young people in this country.

I've noticed it specifically just because I'm in that demographic. I'm a senior in college right now. I think the first that's talked about the most is obviously the media. The liberals control almost all of the media. Yep. And then the second is for sure, the education system. And I've really learned this semester just because I'm home and online and my youngest, my youngest brother is 12 years old and he'll come home from school and tell me that they make that they make the students watch CNN and study halls and take notes on it for extra credit.

And I'm just like, oh, my goodness. It's like it's so obvious what they're doing. It's so obvious how much control they have over these people. And then in college, just seeing how many college kids are at the protests in Lancaster, there was a student from West Chester University that was arrested and put on million dollar bail. And the School of Westchester in Philadelphia is promoting all these go fund me accounts to get her out of prison when she was starting fires in the streets and inciting riots that were dangerous to other human lives on the court.

Yeah, that's in fact, the entire Democrat Party is excuse me, is doing that. Kamala Harris has been raising money to bail out people who have been engaged in protests that have been destroying private property. But you're you're right on both counts. Education and the media are the two primary tools that have been used to corrupt.

Young skulls full of mush when they arrive at various levels of the American education system. Now, it's rare that somebody in the system actually sees it like you do. Most end up just being victimized by it and don't even realize it. They think they're hearing the truth, being told the truth. But you and I'm sure it's because of your steadfast loyalty to this program. You know that you're being lied to. You know, you're being propagandized. And therefore, you have a responsibility to help your your fellow students understand it, and that's not easy.

It's not easy to tell them that they're being made fools of. And that's that's it. Nobody wants to think of themselves as an easy mark. Nobody wants to think of themselves as easily manipulated, lied to and all that. But that's exactly what is happening. And maybe you'll find that more of them are aware of it as you are then than you think. But, yeah, I mean, you have a little bit of a task and objective.

I'm glad you called. I really appreciate it. Last night in Washington. Now, Arlington, Virginia, Hillsdale College, Constitution Day celebration. And they had as their featured speaker, the attorney general, William Barr, and we will see one, two, three, four.

We have four sound bites for excerpts from his remarks and the remarks raised a lot of controversy, created a lot of anger out there.

So let's get started here with the first hour.

Prosecutors have all too often inserted themselves into the political process based on the flimsiest of legal theories. Letting the most junior members set the agenda might be a good philosophy for a Montessori preschool, but it is no way to run a federal agency. What do you mean by interfere under the law or prosecutorial power is vested in the attorney general and these people are agents of the attorney general. And as I say to FBI agents, whose agent do you think you are?

I don't say this in a pompous way, but that is the chain of authority and legitimacy in the Department of Justice. You know, he left no question here who is in charge at the at the Department of Justice.

And it's also it's obvious from listening to him that he is fed up folks he is fed up with. All that is happening is fed up with a lack of law enforcement in places like Portland and Seattle.

It's really, really bothering him.

He said that the coronavirus lockdown, for example, greatest intrusion on civil liberties since slavery. Now, I got to tell you, the congressional black Caucasians had a problem with that and a civil rights calling. You start talking the coronavirus lockdown's compared to slavery and you are going to have a battle on your hands. And he does. But it was it was unconstitutional. They didn't have the authority, the constitutional authority to lock down this country, to tell businesses they can't open.

For example, is unconstitutional, he said that other than slavery, which was a different kind of restraint coronavirus, lockdown's where the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in American history. He has been fuming out there over all of this stuff, here's the next sound bite. They're not interested in black lives. They're interested in they're interested in props. A small number of blacks who were killed by police during conflict with police, usually less than a dozen a year, who they can use as props to achieve a much broader political agenda.

You realize this is one of these statements that a lot of people think more than you would know, but they don't dare voice because they're scared to death. What would happen to them? He's talking here about Black Lives Matter, and he blistered them, but he knows who they are, they're not interested in black lives. That's the marketing. That's the part. That's the umbrella. That's the distraction. That's the way they've made people buy into this silly notion that they're a civil rights group.

They are a full fledged unapologetic Marxist Leninist group which despises the United States of America as founded. They despise capitalism and their objective is to overthrow it.

And Barr knows it, and I'm telling you, he's sitting out there, he's frustrated. But nobody is willing to stand up to him. He's I guarantee you, I've not talked to him. I probably shouldn't put words in his mouth. I'm assuming that he watches one corporate entity after another bend over and grab the ankles of these people. And he's wondering where the hell is the backbone anymore in our country? Where is.

Our spine, they're not interested in black lives, and you realize how these college age, white millennial women, when they hear that you really are mad. That's going to make them when you mean they don't give up black lives. That's all they care about. He's a white supremacist.

That's how they're going to try to characterize Barr and relegate him to irrelevancy.

Just call him a white supremacist when they don't even know what that means. No, they don't know what it means. It's just like, you know, a couple of syllables put together that sound good. But they don't know what white supremacy means. Not as it's used by people mischaracterizing it. They're not interested in black lives, they're interested in props. A small number of blacks killed by police during conflict with police, usually less than a dozen a year they can use as props to achieve a much broader political agenda.

And what that means is they take the instances. Of black lives lost at the hands of the police. And use that to implement a political agenda that they're really not they don't care about George Floyd is his point. They don't care about George Floyd. They don't care about Brianna Taylor. They want you to think that that's why they exist. But that's not at all what their objective is. He's look, he's got to be frustrating like we all are.

If you go to Black Lives Matter website, they're front and center about who they are and what their objective is and how in the world all these different corporate entities can just ignore it. Here's the next short little sound bite.

A person in the white coat is not the grand seer who can come up with the right decision for society. A free people makes its decision through its elected representatives. You hear the applause start at Hillsdale College. The person in the white coat, meaning we're not going to bring some phony baloney plastic banana, good time, rock and roll around here and outfit them in a white coat and tell you they are a scientist, you put a white coat on them.

It doesn't make them a climate change expert. It doesn't make them a coronavirus expert. It makes them a prop.

The person in the white coat, not a grand seer who can come up with the right decision for society. You can almost say. Dr. Foushee is not some grand seer who can come up with the right decision for society, the American people, a free people, make its decision through its elected representatives, not some grand seer. I know he's sitting out there like we all are.

At the ease with which these propagandists are succeeding, here's the final little bite. You know, putting a national lockdown stay at home orders is like house arrest. It's, you know, other than slavery, which was a different kind of restraint. This is the greatest intrusion on civil liberties in American history. Oh, my God, my goodness. Well, we have after the break, James Clyburn, father of Minyon Steak Clyburn of the Congressional Black Caucus, is fit to be tied because the only Democrats are allowed to make comparisons to slavery, not people like Bill Barr.

Fat white guys don't get to do it. We'll be back. Kathy in Houston, I'm glad that you waited. You're up next on the EIB Network. Hello. Hi, Ross. You were talking about women today. And I want to give you a little dirty secret about liberal young liberal women, because I used to be one and I'm not talking about radical, I'm just talking about women in their 20s. My girlfriends and I were liberals, but we all agreed that we wanted to date conservatives because they were real men.

And I ended up meeting one on a on a blind date when he just got back from the Gulf War. And we've been married for 25 years because you wanted to meet a real man.

Yeah. And real men are conservative men because they're not like liberal, what a liberal and a bunch of wusses, what are they?

Just their veins. They're. Rather wimpy, they did not. That's it, you need say no more.

I don't even need to repeat. She said, well, you know, folks, I'm sitting here feeling a little guilty. There's a lot in the stacks I didn't get to today, but I shouldn't feel guilty about it because you don't know what it is. I'm the only one who knows what I didn't get to. So I shouldn't feel guilty about it. If you knew what it was and I didn't get to it didn't maybe.

But regardless, it doesn't matter because there's always tomorrow.

Open line Friday. Looking forward to it even now. So you bet.