Hey, everybody, is Giono Cauldwell, you may know me as a national political analyst, but today I'm here to tell you about my new podcast series OutLoud with J.A. Caldwell, the sworn enemy of PC culture.

I'll interview national guests from all walks of life and real people discussing issues on culture and politics, as well as the controversies that social media plays. Listen to outloud, with General Caldwell launching October 5th on My Heart radio Apple podcast.

Wherever you get your podcast, when it comes to what's happening in this country and around the world, the best podcast you can listen to is the Buck Sexton show. Hey, it's Buck Sexton. Here we are in the height of an election season that will determine the future of the country. Who are you going to listen to? Who can you trust? Who could have thought that when people told Democrats they had to treat Wisconsin like a battleground, they would take it quite so literally?

I heart radio is number one for podcasts, and it's easy to see why. Listen to the Buck Sexton show on the I Heart radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.

Welcome to today's edition of the Rush Limbaugh Show podcast. They keep recycling things now where recycling trumps taxes. And they got him again, folks. They got him again. They thought they had him four years ago on this. They thought they had him three years ago on this. We go back and look at the audio sound bites as we use them then. Not necessary, but they thought they had him. Now they think they've got them again. By the way, folks.

Isn't The New York Times using this tax information to sway an election? Well, is it isn't that illegal, isn't that meddling in an election? Isn't that what The New York Times what's the difference in this and whatever they alleged that the Russians were doing in 2016? So here we are. Great to have you with us. And we are locked and loaded. Reverend, ready telephone number, if you want to be on the program, is 800 to eight to 288 to the email address inrush, both at the EIB in the U.S..

The only thing I don't like about this is it constantly keeps us on defense. They come out with these allegations. By the way, there's going to be more of this. You just have to get ready for it. This is actually delayed. It took them five days rather than the usual day and a half. That's the spacing between so-called scandals that the drive by media has, that the Democrats have, that they drop five days. And you know why?

Let me tell you why this is a total bust. This tax business is a total bust because the primary reason the Democrats in the media wanted it was they were convinced that if they can get hold of Trump's tax returns, that inside those returns would be evidence irrefutable or irrefutable.

For those of you in Rio, Linda, evidence that Trump had indeed meddled with the Russians, that Trump indeed owed all of his financial legitimacy to the Russians, that the tax returns. This is why Trump never wanted to release them, because inside those tax returns was the evidence that Trump and the Russians were in bed together, that Trump was a Russian agent, that Trump had gone to Russia to get bailed out, that it was the Russians who would prompt Trump up financially, that it was the Russians that enabled Trump to remain financially solvent.

And of course, there's none of that. None of that is in Trump's tax returns whatsoever, and it didn't stop him, though, folks, the entire inside the Beltway organization, the club, the deep state.

They were beyond excited orgasmic, they finally had Trump's taxes after years of a massive effort.

And they were going to show that Trump had no business being president. I think these tax returns do show that Trump was not being paid by Putin, there are no connections to Russia in here, Mr. Certainly none, zip zero, not a gigantic bomb out. And you know what, you know what's abundantly obvious as you listen to the media and even their experts try to analyze what they have in these tax returns, it is abundantly clear that television talking heads today, the journalists themselves and their so-called expert guests.

Do not understand, or at least they're pretending not to understand how running a business and managing assets works tax wise. They are literally portraying themselves as dummkopf. They are portraying themselves as ignoramuses here and whether they really are or not remains to be seen, but they're portraying themselves this way. And I think maybe they're doing it in a way to try to relate to most people who would not understand. These things, but let me tell you something, unlike Joe Biden, Donald Trump has not profited from being in office.

He hasn't profited a dime so far, Trump has donated everything he's made in terms of his presidential salary. Back to the government, something few presidents other than Herbert Hoover and JFK have done, most other presidents have kept the money because they needed it. But Trump has given it all back, he's never even received it. Now, the left is betting that this New York Times story and another one that will be coming out in October will be Trump's undoing.

And you know what? Like everything else, I don't think it's going to matter to what? To Trump's base. I don't think it's tax stuff. He is going to matter one whit to the people who plan on voting for Donald Trump now, is it going to make a difference with independents? And who knows? I, I, I, I just.

All we can do is go back and look at history. And it was the case. And back and let's see what was the one he put this stuff to the back of the stack because they had no intention of using it, it was to turn to integrate it into there.

And I don't even know what year it was that they first got hold of. Remember when, when, when, what's her face? Rachel Maddow had one page of Trump's tax returns and did almost two, three hours of exclusive promotion. One page. One page, and I can't remember what year that was, but they went bonkers over it, I think it was twenty, sixteen, twenty eighteen somewhere in there that they tried the very same things.

Let me tell you what these tax returns indicate. Now, The New York Times, the drive by media, they are totally focused on finding tax crimes, finding connections to Russia, and all they have found is that maybe Trump's not the billionaire business genius that he's played so well on TV. Maybe Trump has benefited from a great PR operation, but there isn't any crime in any of this. OK, so Trump may not be a billionaire, I don't know, but it's not a crime if he can convince Forbes and other people that he is.

I mean, Forbes is not a legal entity. They are a publication that runs gossip information on how much people earn. And they do it with they've established a lot of credibility, but they don't they don't operate under force of law or with the permission of law. In other words, the IRS cannot go to Forbes or they can't come to you. Let's say that Forbes magazine, in their annual list of 100 richest people, that matter has me on the list.

At number nine, it's, say, 95 million. The IRS cannot come to me and say, wait a minute, you're not reporting that number you're reporting.

I didn't tell Forbes that. You can't they can't do it. So none of this has any force of legality, whatever Forbes or any of these other publications say. About how much Trump has or how much he's worth or how much he's earned. Doesn't matter, the IRS has the goods. That's what the taxpayer files is what the IRS goes on. They know they might want to try to audit somebody based on these disparities, but it doesn't help. Trust me on this, folks.

It doesn't happen. It was March 2017 that Rachel Maddow hyped the Trump tax story. She literally had just one or two pages. It was the funniest damn thing, and she had the entire left salivating. I mean, they were they were dripping blood, blood was coming out of every bodily orifice they had, they really thought Rachel Maddow, Rachel Maddow, she wouldn't lie. Rachel Maddow would not tease us. Rachel Maddow. And that's all she was because Rachel Maddow doesn't understand.

Tax returns are taxes at the level we are talking about here, not Rachel Maddow is an employee. There is no way employees can possibly understand the taxes or the financial affairs of self-employed people or people that run businesses on them operate them hell. Biden himself tried to play games with the tax code to avoid paying Medicare and other taxes. Payroll taxes by filing is an S. Corp, I mean, and it's legal. John Edwards did it. All kinds of people do it.

What what what gets them on it is hypocrisy. Let me explain how the EZCORP thing works. And we'll use Medicare as an example, because Medicare is the latest addition to the payroll tax. So I may have the numbers slightly wrong here, but the theory that and the data is accurate. So you have under the new law some years ago now, in addition to the FICCA and the payroll tax for Social Security. Everybody has three percent that they must pay to Medicare, Medicaid, whatever it is.

However, there are ways around this you can limit the three percent of, what, three percent of what are you going to pay? So if you structure yourself as a Subchapter S corporation, what you essentially do is assign yourself as the company president and then you pay yourself a salary. And let's say that your company overall generates one million dollars in revenue in any given year. But you don't pay yourself a million dollars on paper under the Subchapter S, you pay yourself fifty thousand dollars a year as your salary.

And guess what? That's what your Medicare tax payment of three percent is based on. Well, John Edwards did this. Biden and his family have done it, all kinds of people. And when Biden did it, nobody did a big, big story in The New York Times about how Joe Biden was attempting to skirt his tax payment responsibilities.

Now, they did eventually go after John Edwards on this, but that was because they lost control of the Edwards situation, because he was having an affair with an illegitimate kid. And it got to the point they couldn't save Edwards. So once it became time to get rid of him, they threw the kitchen sink at him. Now, this is how a lot of people and this is, by the way, it's members of Congress that create the Subchapter S corporation, their C.

Corp's s corpuses, any number of ways you can structure yourself and you structure yourself as an escort, you can limit your health care payments. You can limit any number you because you can limit how much you pay yourself. So you have a company, Joe Biden and Hunter, Biden, frauds, fraud experts at all, whatever.

And their company generates, let's say, three and a half million a year, it comes to the Chinese lessons. So Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, the three and a half million dollars a year. Their file is a subbase and they pay themselves 50000 dollars each, so that's what they pay income taxes on. That's what they pay Medicare. That's what their payroll taxes are. Fifty thousand dollars a year. Well, wait, Rush, what happens to the other three million?

450000? That's exactly right. What happens to that money? It's still theirs. It's still in the corporation. Maybe they come along and they hire other family members. Maybe they set up a nonprofit along with the sub s. But there's any number of ways they maintain control of all that money, it's their corporation, it's just they don't pay themselves a salary. They can be the most famous way is the bonus the employee. So you pay yourself a salary of 50 grand.

And then you bonus yourself a couple million at the end of the year. You don't pay any taxes, well, you'll pay some income tax on the bonus, but you will not pay Medicare and you won't pay Social Security or payroll taxes on how much you are bonus.

And Biden did this. I just want everybody to know the Biden family did this, I've got the story in the stack here somewhere. And it's these kinds of things that that Trump did, the main thing that Trump looking at this, the main thing that Trump is doing is putting more money into his businesses than he's taking out. And who knows, it may be wise or legal, one of these chosen to do it this way. One thing, he's an expert at moving money around to avoid paying taxes, and he's really an expert at making those who loan him money as vulnerable as he is.

They can't they can't call the loans on him. They'd go down the tubes if he does. So he's he's a master at this. These tax returns show that he is a master at using the tax code legally. If Trump had done all of this illegal stuff after all of these years, it would have caught up with him by now.

Now the drive bys are focusing in on a 72 million dollar refund, and they're trying to say that that 72 million dollar refund was illegal. It's made up of phony losses.

And so, well, that's up to the IRS folks to go after people that lie or file false returns or what have you. And they do it if they think that somebody is gaming the system or that they can get money out of them and they haven't done it with Trump yet. So now Trump is going to be forced to explain all this tax stuff. Shouldn't there be some outrage directed at Congress and the guy who's been in government for forty seven years, Joe Biden, for creating a tax code like this, that smart citizens simply go out and hire the smartest other citizens they can find to use it to their greatest benefit?

Why didn't Biden do something about the tax laws in all of his years as a senator? If he's going to sit there and act so outraged that a citizen would try to take as much advantage of the tax laws as he or she can? Thing about Donald Trump, this guy, he can keep 20 plates spinning. At all times he is indefatigable and he's organized and he can keep track of a whole bunch of different things going on at the same time, and that mindset and way of dealing with a lot of issues at one time is what's made him such a success in solving so many issues that he has taken on as president that have plagued this country for decades.

Trump has solved so many things in three and a half years that previous presidents have claimed to want to fix, but have just never gotten around to it.

It is unique in Washington to solve problems, it is unique to fix things, Washington generally doesn't do this. They don't want taxpayers or citizens to think that it's that easy. Trump comes along and literally reignited. An economy had been stagnated for eight years, stagnating under Obama. Look, I'm up against a long time, a quick time out.

We'll take it and you can tell folks wherever we're ready and we will keep going once we get back here.

Hi, how are you? Welcome back. Rush Limbaugh, EIB Network. It is Debate Day minus one. Joe Biden put a lid on his campaign again today at nine thirty two this morning, meaning that's the end of the day for Plug's Biden. His wife, Jill, has said some things over the weekend that may give us an indication how Plug's is going to play it tomorrow in the debate if it happens. And I will share with you what I think plugs his wife indicated in mere moments now, folks, we knew that they would go full, low road on Amy CONI Barrett, and they are.

There were some people I talked to, some people who thought, you know, Rush, I think the Democrats may back off. I think the Democrats, they may not even show up at the hearings. Rush. I think they realize that there's nothing they can do to stop it. And if the only thing that could possibly happen is if they go full, Benji, that they're going to end up looking bad and so close to the election. So, Rush, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the Democrats just kind of don't even show up or back on.

So you got to be you think they're going to give up a nationally televised opportunity if they don't even go after her to savage Donald Trump for hours on the end under the guise? Of of of confirmation hearings, there's no way that they're not not going to show up. It has always been the case that they were going to go full, low road on Amy CONI Barrett and they are some professor, University of Boston Professor Ibrahim Kendi.

Is now saying ready for this? Amy Barrett is not qualified for the United States Supreme Court because she is a white coloniser. And you know why she's a white coloniser, because she adopted two kids from Haiti. For those of you in Rio, Linda may not know, kids from Haiti are black. Now, they never said that about Madonna. They never said that about Sandra Bullock and never said that about Steven Spielberg, Angelina Jolie, Brad's the prince.

Tom Cruise, Connie Britton, Charlize Theron, Michelle Pfeiffer, Mitt Romney's family, they all adopted black kids and in fact, I even labeled them the popular accessory of the day because every socially conscious lab was doing it and they were doing it to great praise and great acclaim.

They were great because they cared. They were trying to help the downtrodden, but not Miss Barrett.

Greetings. Welcome back. Rush Limbaugh doing what I was born to do. And I woke up today, thanked God that I did.

Another opportunity to spend another day doing what I love to do with the people that I love. It's a great day. Great to have you here. The telephone number, 800 202 two eight eight two. So is boss. University Professor Ibrahim Kennedy claims that Amy CONI Barrett is a white coloniser for adopting two black children. Look, I had a kind of hurry through that, but let's remember the left and a number of its entertainment bigwigs were out doing the same thing.

Madonna adopted a couple of African-American well, Africans, Sandra Bullock, Steven Spielberg, Angelina Jolie, Brad is the pits. Tom Cruise, Connie Britton. Charlize Theron. Michelle Pfeiffer. The Romney family, they all adopted black kids and they all did it to great acclaim and they all over were said to have wonderful hearts and tremendous compassion and mercy. And they're not racist is why Mitt Romney stands out in the Republican Party, because no Republican would do it comes Amy.

Tony, we can't let her get away with this. No, no. She is a white coloniser. It's not just these famous people, thousands of people in this country have adopted black kids who were unwanted or drug addicted when they were born. They've done it with little fanfare. They've done it with no credit. They haven't done it to get credit. They've done it because they're good souls with big hearts. And they are all over the spectrum, and I remember this was it became a craze, you know, once once it became fashionable to do this, I labeled.

In fact. I I think it was after is either Madonna or Connie Britton, one of those two actually I think it was after Madonna adopted her second, I said, you know what? These have become the perfect Hollywood accessory.

And yes, by that, I meant that there might be a little insincerity going on here and a lot of a lot of PR and buzz behind all of this.

But I'll tell you what is going to come up as a subject matter in the confirmation hearings, and that is the. Role of religion in American life, and I'll guarantee damn to you that. People on our side had better be prepared to defend religion in American life because this is where the left is going to go.

They can't. Go after Amy Koni buried in a personal way, they went after Kevin on. Unless they want to say that she is the person that ballsy Ford couldn't remember at the party. But they're not going to they can't they can't go after her, they're going to go after her in ways she obviously doesn't care about her family. Her family is too big. She can't possibly raise a family responsibly with that many kids and also having a job as an appellate judge.

I think what they're going to do is go after religion, because, folks, it's such a big deal to the American left, they despise it and they hate it. They hate Christianity and Catholicism and they hate the belief system itself, they hate what Christianity and Catholicism provide the believers something other than the state to believe in. The whole notion of religion in American life is one of the big areas that the two political parties are drifting further and further apart, we, the Democrats and most of the media are becoming more secular.

The Republican Party is becoming more religious. Happily and proudly so, so the more that the Democrats can demonize and diminish religion, the more power they will have over people. Look at look at the way these Democrat governors and mayors throughout the early days of covid-19 up to the present, look what they focused on to keep closed. And we're not allowing anybody to congregate in groups of over 10, 15, 20. It was churches, synagogues, mosques.

In fact, most of them were required to be closed because of the coronavirus, schools were opened, businesses were open, athletic events were open. But the first chance, they had to shut down churches. They took it. And I think this is one of the areas that they are going to focus on, Amy, Connie Barrett, she's obviously religious, she's devoutly Catholic, she is a believer. And as far as they're concerned, that's a gigantic threat.

That's that's where the dogma lives loudly with her, as Dianne Feinstein said.

And Dianne Feinstein previewed the way that they are going to go after Amy Connie Barrett three years ago or two, whatever it was when she sat down for confirmation hearings for her current job on the U.S. Court of Appeals. So we knew they would go along. We knew they would go full. So they are doing so. I think this ends up helping Trump and I think it ends up helping her. I don't think they are able once they start going down the low road, they're unable to discipline themselves once they hit the low road.

And the genuine disgust. And the hatred they have for religious people will not be contained despite their best efforts. If you look around out there, if you have the ability to look around out there objectively, every sign is that Trump is surging. It's it's it's you know, to me, it's amazing how this thing is shaping up like 2016 all over again, look at what we've got. We have an obvious lack of enthusiasm on the part and on the side of the Democrats.

Why, while we have a lack of enthusiasm, we have arrogance. The Democrats are ignoring. The age old tried and true tactics of campaigning, retail campaigning, like door to door, meet and greet, they're not doing any of it. There is no ground campaign. They sit around and they quote the pollster, Nate Silver. The supposedly they quote him all the time. He is the guy giving them all the confidence in the world that the polls are right and that Biden is leading by 10 or 12.

And it's a landslide victory as we sit here today. They're talking about red states that are going to flip their talk about Trump's unpopularity there everywhere. Nobody's going to vote for this guy. He's even sicker now than he was four years ago. It's it's also an exact repeat, not exact, there are some differences, but it's so close to 2016, including we've got two polls, we've got Rasmussen and Trafalgar and those two polls have it dead even or Trump ahead in key states, all of the others.

You've got political Washington Post, New York Times, ABC, CBS, Washington, Wall Street Journal, they are hanging in with almost identical polling results that they have in 2016. What do you mean, Rush, you think it's still Trump is still surging? Well, look, folks, I'd be worried if gun sales were flat, but they're not. Do you know the NBA is losing viewer, do you know that Tucker Carlson show one night last week outrated an NBA playoff game?

When has that ever happened? Nothing against Tucker Carlson. When does that ever happen? In other words, the NBA is featured there, features people that hate Trump. Features people love Black Lives Matter, Antifa, loves people that want to take out after this country and kneel during the anthem, disrespect the flag, they're not drawing flies.

They're not drawing huge, huge ratings, nobody's nobody's watching Major League Baseball was pretty much the same with the NFL. Yeah, it's it's hard to measure, but they're not they're not blowing the doors down neither of these former ratings behemoths.

If all that were happening, I'd be a little bit more concerned, you know, Biden. If Biden was on the trail 24/7 and if Kamala Harris was out there barnstorming, but she's not and Biden's not, Biden's call to lead on over half the days in September, he has not been out there campaigning when he's relying on is all of his ads to make it look like he's everywhere. But he's not questioning, you have to ask is how many people know that he's nowhere versus who watch the ads and think that he's everywhere because the media is not reporting that Plug's is basically comatose.

When it comes to campaign activity, then you've got this New York Times story, I'm sorry, the tax story, it's a dud. It is a dud measured against their expectations. And their hopes, they were convinced. That trumps taxes, would reveal evidence of collusion with Putin and with Russia. They were dead certain that Trump's tax returns is why Trump didn't want to reveal them, that Trump's tax returns would show massive ties, humungous involvement between Trump and the Russian oligarchs and their businesses and Putin, that Russia had basically underwritten Trump's businesses, that without Russia, Trump's businesses would have gone bankrupt years ago.

They thought all of that would be in Trump's tax returns. And on that basis, it is a total bomb for them.

None of the rest of the tax story is is news when you get. Right down to it, but the one thing the one thing, folks, remains these polling units you've got you've got Trafalgar and Rasmussen who, as I said, have it dead even or even Trump ahead in key states, in key battleground states. And they had to go back to 2016, they had much better records, much better performance than all the other polling units in 2016.

Now have Trump down if you go to the real Clear Politics average of average of polls of polls, five to seven, Trump's down some places 10. And I have to ask myself, are these people are these polling units? Are they willing to ruin their brands, their reputations, just to lie to help Biden? Are they willing to do this a second time after Hillary because they did the same thing? That's why this is part of a feels like a replay of 2016.

And I think they would, you know why, but I think any organization, any business, any company that thinks it's on the same team as the drive by media will have cover. So if you are a polling unit and you get it dead wrong two cycles in a row, if the media doesn't say you got it wrong and if they don't embarrass you and if they don't harp on it, then. No big deal. OK, so the American people, well, the polls are really wrong, but they're not going to think much of it beyond that other than people like you in this audience will understand what's going on.

But they think I'm convinced I don't care what business it is or what polling unit it is or what consumer, what if they think the media is on their side?

They've got cover. They've got cover to be wrong, they've got cover to lie because they know that the media is not going to call them on any of the things they blew up.

Now, very quickly, I'm going to elaborate on this, but I think if Biden shows up for the debate tomorrow night and I'm still I'm not I'm not going to backtrack here. I'm still going to tell you. I don't think there's going to be a debate. I'm totally willing to be wrong about this, but I'm not going to backtrack from my original prediction. I think I know if Biden shows up what they're going to do based on some giveaways.

His wife has kind of telegraphed here. I think that you should look for Biden to be totally nonresponsive in his debate. Nancy, get Chris Matthews. I'm sorry. Chris Wallace is going to be asking these questions. Vice President Biden. What are your thoughts on the president's attempts to deal with Obamacare? No, in fact, let me get better. What what are your thoughts here on climate change and the effect it's having? And Donald Trump sucks.

You understand me? Come on, man. Donald Trump has no business being president. Why is a guy, even president, he'd even win the election. The Russians got him over the finish line. And I think this is what we're going to get from the guy. I don't think we're going to get one substantive answer unless it's so simple that he can't blow it. I think every answer from Biden is going to be an attack on Trump, on Trump's illegitimacy, on Trump being a liar, on Trump being a fake, on Trump being a phony, on Trump being Mr.

Orangeman. I think that's what they are training Biden to do.

I think that they are loading Biden up with 90 minutes worth of insults. And attack phrases. On Donald Trump and they're coaching him, don't answer any of these substantive questions on policy. Just go straight into how you can't even believe you have to be on the same stage. You know, go ahead and steal Pelosi's line. Trump is such a liar that you can't believe you even have to give him legitimacy by showing up. And I think that's what we're going to get.

His wife is pretty much telegraphed that let me grab a quick call, Matt in Chicago. Great to have you. Up first today on the EIB Network. Hello. Hey, Rush, how are you? I'm fine, sir, thank you. Thanks for taking my call. I just had a quick question regarding the Supreme Court nomination. I you know, I heard I haven't heard anywhere else about this characterization of that. She's a coloniser. And I'm just wondering, is this guy who saying this is he is he even a politician?

Does he speak for the Democratic Party? Why are we even giving him a voice?

Because there's a big news story about the guy. I you know, and I copy put it on you and I prepare a sheet every every show called Show Thoughts and then the date, rather than print out a bunch of little items here and have them on numerous pieces of paper, I copy and paste them onto an e-mail to myself. And I've got about 10 or 12 on today's show, thoughts 928 20, which is today's date. And so this guy is at the top of the list from a couple of stories that I saw where he's out there.

This is being reported as him having said this. But but look, liberal pretty much think the same way. I mean, if he's thinking this a lot of more. Yeah, I think that, you know, on both sides of the aisle, there's always like this they this this term using the term they describe like a whole bunch of people when I when I feel like that's kind of the problem now with politics is like, you know, one person says something and then it gets labeled to the whole side, you know?

And I think I see that I'm he's a college professor and he's out teaching young skulls full of mush. And he's just informed everybody the kind of stuff he's teaching young students. This is what he thinks. And not just about Amy Country. We now know what this guy thinks about colonization and the American United States being a colonizer, which is which is absurd.

But no, I think it's applicable because it works because it defines liberalism pretty solidly.

I have another interesting theory about the polls and why the pollsters are doing what they how they're doing it, actually.

So it's pretty fascinating to hang on for that. We'll get to it as soon as we get back here.

Hey, everybody, is Janelle Caldwell. You may know me as a political analyst on national TV, but today I'm here to tell you about my new podcast series OutLoud with Giono Caldwell, the sworn enemy of PC culture, which I know isn't very PC to say these days. But that's why I'm here. I'll interview national newsmakers from all walks of life, internationally renowned guests from across the political spectrum and real people like you discussing real issues on culture and politics, as well as the controversies that have social media blazing.

You know, the kinds of controversies that may get me in trouble if the mob ever finds out. Well, I grew up on the south side of Chicago.

I'm not afraid of a liberal mob. They should be afraid of me.

Listen to Out Loud with General Caldwell launching October 5th on the I Hate Radiolab Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast. That's out loud. With General Caldwell launching October 5th on the I Heart radio app, Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast.

Kandace Owen's just knocked out Cardi B in Poke, the biggest hole yet in the stranglehold entertainment and media have on the minds of black voters in this country. I'm Robert Smith and all the next episode of Robert Smith is problematic. We are going to break down why the left uses idiots to reach black America and how Qantas Owen's just put them all on notice that they cannot do it anymore. Listen to Rob Smith is problematic on the radio app, on Apple podcasts and wherever you get your podcasts.

Hey, it's Buck Sexton.

Here we are in the height of an election season that will determine the future of the country. Who are you going to listen to? Who can you trust? Join me in the freedom hunt, the one place where you know you'll get the straight story from a conservative perspective. Joe Biden, somebody who's been a machine politician in the Democrat Party from Delaware for longer than I've been alive. And nobody thought he was impressive. No one thought he had great leadership until about five minutes ago.

They're trying to fool you. They're trying to pull off a con, a fraud against America. And Joe Biden is the con man in chief, the biggest names and the heaviest hitters in politics, trust me.

So we've done a lot. But can we have some great support for your viewpoint is very important to make. Very, very important. That's how we got to know each other.

Buck Sexton, formerly of the CIA, it's great to be back on the Buck Sexton show.

I Heart Radio is number one for podcast, and it's easy to see why. Listen to Buck Sexton show on the I Heart radio app or wherever you get your podcast.

Alrighty then. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. It's a delight. It's a thrill to be with you each and every day right here behind the Golden EIB microphone and the one and only Excellence in Broadcasting Network. I am your host, America's real anchorman. America's truth detector. The Doctor of Democracy. And general all around, good guy, a household name in all Four Corners of the world, telephone number if you want to be on the program, 800 two eight two two eight eight two, send an email.

I check them, as you know, because I quote them. We got one coming up here, El Rushville and EIB. That got us.

As I say, ladies and gentlemen, the similarities between this year and 2016 keep adding up, for example. We were told that Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 because she didn't campaign in places like Wisconsin. And Pennsylvania. So now in twenty twenty, Joe Biden is not campaigning. Not just in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, he's not campaigning anywhere, Biden isn't going anywhere. But again. His advertising campaign makes it look like he's everywhere, and I'm sure that's what he's relying on.

We also have here's another similarity between 2016 and today. Two Democrat candidates. Whose health is extremely questionable but totally ignored. By the drive, by media, I mean there, Hillary Clinton was barely able to walk. Hillary Clinton was barely able to climb three steps to get to a seat on a bus, leaving a memorial service at nine 11 down in Manhattan. Hillary Clinton was having seizures, she was having frozen moments in time. There was video of all of this, but it never found its way into drive by media, but we all saw it.

And would you believe that most of the people that watch mainstream media still do not know?

The extent to which Joe Biden is suffering from dementia or mental deficiencies, they're just not. Reporting it, it's uncanny the similarities. It literally is uncanny. Let's go back to the polling for a moment, because in the polling it's almost identical. The polling of 2016 had Hillary winning by landslide margins, there were just a couple of polling units that had Trump holding steady, maybe even eking out a win. Same now. Every reputable polling unit you've ever heard of.

Has Joe Biden winning in a landslide plus 10, plus 12, plus eight. Just a couple have Donald Trump barely hanging on and maybe maybe winning, one is Rassmussen, the other is Trafalgar. Which takes me to the polling and a theory. Friend of mine had a fascinating conversation. With an off the record Polster. And this off the record, Polster, meaning the poster did not want to be known, did not want to be identified, he was content to share with my buddy how they are doing this, but he didn't want his name mentioned and I don't know the name.

My buddy has not furnished the name. But here's the theory. This is the theory to explain the polling discrepancies. The polls are deliberately oversampling mushy suburban Republicans. To cover charges that they are shorting Republicans overall and deliberately under sampling of rural and small town conservative Democrat zip codes. All of this to prove that they are not oversampling Democrats. Then they announce that they are scientifically fair on party affiliation. When they know in Trump's case, he has far more support from Reagan Democrats than from Bush suburbanites.

And when I saw this theory, when this was explained to me and I got the note here during a commercial break in about 20 minutes ago, I said, you beat myself upside the head. No wonder this makes perfect sense. This is exactly how they're doing it. They're oversampling Republican suburbs. Who lives in Republican suburbs, white educated women who hate Trump. White, college educated millennials who literally despise Trump and the fact that they are Republican is all the better for the poor polling units because they can then say we're not shorting Republicans.

Our sample is not short of Republicans. In fact, in one sense, they're oversampling to a degree. And they are charging Republicans where the true Trump support is, so they run through this again and again, explain to a friend of mine had a conversation with an off the record pollster who clarified how these popular nationwide nominees, nationally known name polling units, are doing it and showing Biden plus eight and plus 10. The first thing the polls are doing is deliberately oversampling suburban Republican voters.

That would be largely women. The word here is Mushi. So you could have some Republican men thrown in there, but the you know, you've heard the old saw here that Trump is just doing horribly, horribly in the suburbs.

Suburban women hate Trump. How many of you have heard that college educated suburban women, they despise Trump?

Well, it turns out that these voters are being deliberately oversampled for two reasons. A, they're being oversample because the pollsters love the fact they hate Trump, but also oversampling Republicans suburbanites allows them to beat back allegations that they are shorting Republicans and deliberately under sampling them.

So who are they? Understand they are deliberately under sampling people that live in small towns and rural conservative Democrat zip codes. And they're doing that to prove that they are not oversampling Democrats. So they're doing two things here that are producing massive anti Trump results and they are ignoring. Voters who would be massively for Trump, and they're doing it in order to show that they're not shorting Democrats or Republicans and they're not oversampling Democrats. In other words, they have found where to go to find Republicans who hate Trump suburbanite.

Dwellers, suburban dwellers, mainly women. They have also found. Where not to go? To avoid Democrat support for Trump, and that would be rural small town think. Swing districts think places Trump won in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. They are not going to those places where conservative Democrats are. And they're purposely not going there so they can prove that they're not oversampling Democrats, they love to be able to tell people questioning their work.

Well, we're not oversampling Democrats. In fact, look, we're oversampling the Republicans in the suburbs that we're understanding. Some of these conservatives are some of these rural Democrat areas.

And then after they do all of that, then they announce. That they have been scientifically fair. On party affiliation. They are doing it this way to refute allegations that they are under sampling Republicans, because remember, in every poll that we have analyzed or looked at for the last number of who knows what year's. You dig deep into the polling data and you will find that the. Democrats are massively oversample, 38 percent, Democrats, 24 percent Republican, 39 percent independent or whatever it is.

And so people always say, see, see, no wonder they're getting all these favorable results for Repub or for Democrats because they're not sampling enough Republicans.

Well, that's what this is meant to counter. They announced that they scientifically. Ah, right down the middle in finding participants in the poll, proper party affiliation, but they know in Trump's case that he has a lot more support from Reagan Democrats than he does from Republican suburbanites. So if they oversample Republican suburbanites and understandable where conservative Democrats live, then they're going to get results like they've got. And they can say all the while that their results are right on the money based on their sample.

They can say they're not making anything up, they're not fudging anything. And so if Trump ends up winning again, they say, you know, well, we just we we must have picked the wrong sample, but they're not going to admit that anything was done on purpose. They're going to stand by. They're sample as what they thought was the best cross section of the voting public that they could find poll after poll after poll, when, in fact what they're doing.

Is oversampling Republicans of hate trump, you imagine if you find that group, if it's true and it is. That suburban white. Women, Republican women don't like Trump, and if you can find a number of them to poll, you kill two birds with one stone, you go out and find a bunch of people who hate Trump who happen to be Republicans. Oh, my God. We found a way to make sure we don't have to short shrift Republicans in the sample.

That is an added bonus. You find out where Democrats who love Trump are and you don't sample them, you sample other Democrats where you know they hate Trump and that's how you end up with what they've ended up with.

Now, this all comes from a pollster. Admitting all this to a friend of mine who is then passing it on to me for interpretation and analysis and eventual repetition to you. Now, I mentioned I got an email earlier. I got I got an email from a friend. Very protective friend, a friend who says, Rush, I think you're you're forgetting something very, very important in this whole debate business, and that's the way it's going to get covered.

Now, let me repeat, and this is based on Jill Biden. Jill Biden was on CNN with Jake Tapper. And Tapper asked her yesterday. About all of her husband's gaffes. And she cut Tapper off, she refused to entertain or answer answer any further questions about Biden's gaffes, saying you can't go there, you can't even go there, it's over after Donald Trump. You can't even say the word gaffe, meaning you can't accuse my husband of gaffes after this guy Trump.

Trump lies every time he opens his mouth and you say, my husband's got gaffe after you can't even go there. So that tells me how they're going to deal with this tomorrow. Whatever this is what they're prepping Biden to do, whatever question Chris Wallace asks. The answer is an attack on Trump. Do not answer a single substantive policy question. Not what you're going to do about climate change, don't answer what you're going to do about it, whatever the question is, you attack Trump, that's all it is.

That's all you do. His wife has said. That that's what they're going to do, that Trump is not it's also, you know what, it's an extension of Pelosi. Pelosi is saying.

That she doesn't think Biden should even grace the debate stage because Trump doesn't deserve it. Trump is. Has no fidelity to the truth, there is no logical reason to debate Donald Trump. Donald Trump is so off the beaten path. Donald Trump is such a liar, he's such a stinker. He's such a rotten guy that we shouldn't even validate his legitimacy by showing up. So Biden shows up. And the way he carries out Pelosi's dictum is to simply essentially say with every answer, I can't believe I have to give this guy any credibility at all.

Mr. Mr. Wallace. I can't believe I have to be on the same stage with this guy. This guy doesn't deserve me being here. He doesn't deserve any decent American being up here. This guy can't tell the truth. He hasn't told the truth. He is a stranger to the truth. And I refuse to sit here and validate anything that he says. I think that's what they are briefing and preparing Biden to do. To essentially every answer, point out how.

The answer is not relevant. The answer doesn't matter because I shouldn't even be here. I shouldn't be here validating Donald Trump, he's a despicable human being and then, you know, go into how many people have died for covid-19, how much Trump didn't care about. But whatever lies they want to tell. But I think that is the way that they are coaching. And I figured this out with Joe Biden's answer to Jake Tapper yesterday. And then putting that together with Pelosi.

Well, I don't think I don't think Joe should go to the debate either. Trump has no fidelity to the truth, so I think it's pretty clear what's going to happen.

Biden's going to avoid any substantive answers and therefore no gaffes, and he's just going to say. As often as he can. That he doesn't think this debate should even be happening, that this guy just needs to be gotten away with, he shouldn't even be president, we can fix this in about six weeks. But I shouldn't be here even validating this guy's existence. That's that's what I think they're going to do. That's easy for plug's to remember. I mean, that's much better thing to coach him with than to get specific on every policy possibility that might come up.

Plus if he pulls that off, the base would absolutely love it.

And I want to get back to the phones. I'll share with you the the email that I got from a from a friend here in a minute about the way the debate's going to be covered. That's what the emails about. Here's here's Julie in and over Kansas. Great to have you. You are number two today on the phones. Great to have you here. Hi.

Hi, Rose. Oh, my gosh. I can't believe I'm talking to you. I'm a huge fan. Thank you. My question is about the debate tomorrow. And I am concerned that if Trump is too hard on Biden or just goes after him and too strong the way that maybe people are going to start feeling sorry for Biden and maybe might tend to be like, hey, we're not going to vote for Trump, we're going to go with Biden if Trump kind of comes across.

You know, I've actually I've heard and I love I love President Trump. I love President Trump. I just want to make that clear. But that's my concern, is that people, you know, that psychological aspect, they might start to be more empathetic or sympathetic towards Biden because.

Because you think Biden is not capable and it'll be obvious that he's not capable. And so if Trump goes in for the kill, it's going to appear to be inhumane.

Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah.

What are you going to say if I'm right, though? And what if Biden comes out of the box basically saying he doesn't even think he ought to be there, but Trump might not even be on the stage? Trump is such an embarrassment. Trump is such he's a despicable human being. He can't tell the truth. Look at all the people who have died because of covid, because he doesn't care about it. And I shouldn't even have to be up here.

I shouldn't have to validate this guy. This guy needs to be sent packing before any of us know what's going to happen. What if his whole modus operandi is to not say anything substantive so he doesn't come off as as as as unprepared and incompetent? What if he just does nothing but attacks Trump left, right, top down?

Well, you know, I think it's really important for President Trump to take the emotion out of it and stay focused on his accomplishments and the issues. And, you know, my dad gave me some advice a long time ago. He said, you know, if you have to confront somebody about something, don't personally attack them. Just go with the facts, take the emotion out of it and just stick to the issues. And I think people are going to admire President Trump for that.

And if I could, I want to personally thank President Trump for saying that our security is his number one priority. He won me completely. I was already a fan of his. He said that after his inauguration. And so thank you, President Trump, for that. That is hugely important. But stay unemotional. Don't let Biden get to you. Just focus on the facts. Stay calm and focus on your cause.

Are you worried that Trump is going? Are you worried Trump's going to blow this? No, I'm not. I'm not worried because he always he's just incredible. I think he understands people. I think he understands.

Yet you think that he could run the risk of looking like a bully debating plugs?

Well, he I think he has to be careful. I think he has to walk a fine line because. Right.

I it's always up to us to make sure we don't misbehave when they lie through their teeth about us day in and day out.

OK. Hi. Welcome back. Great to have you. I just checked the email.

We get a lot of people are very, very angry out there over the caller we had who dared question my selection of a story about about the from the professor Ibraheem Kennedy, you know, on the on Amy CONI Barrett being a white coloniser, how dare that guy question your ability to determine what's good or not good for your own show? Well, I really appreciate you people having that kind of sensitivity. I've gotten so I don't get offended by that kind of stuff anymore because I recognize what it is.

This guy was trying is a good liberal, it was a nice liberal and he was doing damage control. Come on, Rush some some out of the way. One guy says something and you want to try to plaster it to all of liberalism. Well, yeah, I do, because the left is now demanding that the guy resign because he's such a damn problem for them. Now, he's not some irrelevant guy teaching a lonely class that nobody knows about.

UK Daily Mail. Has the story of the Boston University professor being urged to resign for calling Amy CONI Barrett a white coloniser, but he did more than that. Put this up there, Brian. This guy is a college professor and he teaches critical race theory and this is one of his prepared pamphlets. Look at this. He's got clowns holding his, you know how to be an anti-racist. This is clearly he's preparing something here to appeal to young children, fun with critical race theory.

Take something beautiful and make it ugly. And I want to read to you and this is the guy who said that Amy CONI Barrett is not compassionate and she's not a good woman. She is a white colonizers. I just want to read because it's going to be small. For those of you on the little cat I'm trying to read this will have it at Rush Limbaugh Dotcom in a in a better size. But here's the guy. Story couple has five kids.

They adopt two more from an orphanage in poverty stricken Haiti. You might think this is beautiful, but no, this is not beautiful. These people are white colonizers. This couple thinks these kids are savages. This couple thinks they are civilizing these savages in the superior ways of white people. This couple is is is using these kids as props in their life long pictures of denial while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity. This is what critical race theory teaches.

This is what critical race theory scholars say. You can learn more about critical race theory. We think you'll find it on scholarly, unscientific, intolerant, divisive and racist. Just because it's against racism doesn't mean it's good. This is somebody is attacking the professor here, Ibram Kennedy, but he believes. Critical race theory and here's why he believes that Amy CONI Barrett is a white coloniser. For adopting two black children from but don't forget all of the Hollywood actresses who did this to great acclaim, they were celebrated.

And I said, yeah, well, these are people just accessorizing. If the latest fad, it's the latest way good liberals show that they are good people. Now to the email that I got. Mr. Limbaugh. You know as well as I do, sir. That it doesn't matter who says what in the debate tomorrow night. Now I'm going to disagree with that premise because I do think. That I'm right, I based on I'm combining Pelosi's Hintze.

To Biden's handlers and what what Biden's wife said over the weekend. I do think just just to reiterate. That Biden has been coached all of these days where they put a lid on his campaign at nine thirty in the morning, I think Biden's been coached that no matter what he's asked, his answer is to destroy Trump, just constantly rip Trump. Just go after Trump as a despicable human being, go after Trump is somebody who doesn't deserve to be on the stage even though he's president.

He doesn't deserve to be debating Joe Biden. Joe Biden is so eminently more qualified and valid, Donald Trump.

Has impugned and embarrassed the country, he's embarrassed the office of the presidency is lying. You know, whatever attacks on Trump that they can put into his head, I think this is where Biden is being coached. Don't answer a single substantive policy question. With substance, take every question and just go after Trump. And the premise being that Trump is such a despicable human being. He's such a liar, he's such a decent in that. That. You, Joe Biden, you don't even think you should be validating his presidency by showing up on stage and you're only doing it out of the sense of duty and tradition.

And there he is, the Democrat base will love it. My buddy says here that Rush, no matter what happens, you have to understand the stories and the headlines already written, it does not matter what happens in this debate Tuesday. You don't have to watch it, Rush. I can tell you what the headlines in the stories are going to be ready. Joe Biden blew it out of the water. Joe Biden defied all expectations. Joe Biden took it to Donald Trump and never let up.

Joe Biden stood toe to toe with Donald Trump, mano a mano and never wavered. Joe Biden was funny, he was glib, and he was on message for the entire debate. Joe Biden outlined his policy superbly. Joe Biden was very cogent. He made no mistakes, fact checkers still can't find any gaffes made by Biden.

The biggest applause line of the night goes to Biden, except there will not be any applause because there will not be any audience. Did you know that? And not letting an audience in there because a covid-19. Which is also to Biden's benefit. Trump feeds off of that stuff. And if Trump were getting a lot of really favorable applause, applause, Biden would be intimidated by it.

Trump would also be in for his share of mistreatment, boos and that kind of thing. But no, no, no. I think I heard that there's no audience in there. Another headline, Biden Shocks World with first debate performance. Election takes a turn with Biden's perfect debate performance, vice president says bring on the next one. Vice president so stoked with debate performance on Tuesday night, has asked Trump for two more debates. Vice president could not believe how easy it was to deal with the problematic president of the United States, Donald Trump.

I can see these headlines, these stories already written. These are also already written, by the way, these headlines and the accompanying stories. Donald Trump was perplexed for most of the night, Donald Trump surprisingly stumbled out of the gate, never did quite put it all together. Donald Trump came out and was obviously too confident, too arrogant and never realized how he was not connecting the whole night. Debate moderator Chris Wallace says he was stunned at how disconnected Trump seemed the entire night.

Fact checkers during the debate say that Trump was wrong 532 times and still counting. Another headline will be Donald Trump failed miserably to explain his taxes. Donald Trump, under pressure, was unable to refute the notion that he meddled with the Russians in the 2016 election and that the same kind of meddling is planned for 2020 as election. Donald Trump unable to dispute the allegation that he will cheat in the 2020 election by continuing to meddle with the Russians. Donald Trump did not look like an incumbent at the debate tonight.

Donald Trump looked like the pretender, Donald Trump looked like he knew he had no business being on that stage. Donald Trump did not answer any questions. Now this is what Biden's going to do, not answer anything, but they're going to accuse Trump. Donald Trump did not answer any questions. Donald Trump had nothing to say about what happened with covid-19 and why so many Americans have died on his watch. Trump came across as incoherent, Trump even appeared to be mentally out of it for some period of time during the debate.

Many psychologists are wondering if Donald Trump experienced some kind of miniature stroke during the course of the debate. Donald Trump appeared to exude symptoms of Alzheimer's disease during the debate when he was unable to recall even the most basic elements of the questions put to him by Joe Biden and Chris Wallace. So these are the kinds of headlines I think are already written.

These are the stories doing accompanying that are already written on both the pro Biden and anti Trump side. Certainly who is in screening calls, we can't listen to the program with great attention, obviously caught me in the middle of what the hell am I missing? What what the hell is. So these are I'm predicting that these are headlines that we will see tomorrow. They are not headlines written well, they're written now, we just we won't see them until till tomorrow night and into Wednesday after the debate is over.

To issue a correction here, folks. And this is what happens when people send me things in the middle of the show and I don't have time to check them. And I just have to assume I don't think the professor Ibram Thandi, I don't think he actually wrote that little cartoon piece I put up on the little cam that was somebody critical of critical race theory, using him as the target and they were making fun. He does believe in critical race theory, but I think that piece I put up was done by somebody to point out how bad it is, the way it was sent to me and the context in which it came.

I assumed that it was part of his teaching material. And this is the risk I run because people assume I understand things I can't possibly know when it all happens during the program. So and it's just an effort to be as current and topical as possible. But I think I've got to run a correction here. I don't think that was anything. The professor, anything to do with creating. I think it was done by somebody to point out how bad critical race theory is and used him and what he has said about Amy.

Connie Barrett, as an example. Here's Doree in Phoenix. It's great to have you on the EIB Network. Hello.

Hello. REST's I am calling because I wanted to clarify some things that the average media idiot and Democrat doesn't understand or don't understand about taxes, business taxes, because they don't have real jobs and they don't own their own businesses. And we are in the real estate business. And Trump's tax returns make absolute, perfect sense to us. For one thing, they talk about losses. Losses are nothing more than business expenses. So that doesn't mean, oh, he's a bad business man.

He lost money. Also, he took only legal real estate deductions and only an idiot wouldn't take every legal deduction that you can. And you're the 2020. The new law that he signed into law is actually harder on real estate professionals like us, because my husband's goal in life has been not to pay taxes for years. And in 2020, we're going to pay a lot more taxes than we ever have with our real estate business because of the new tax law that's in place, which means it also hurts Trump.

He actually signed a law that hurts his business a little more. So he's not trying to get away with anything.

And, well, you know, the proof of that, the this is the thing. The proof of that is that the IRS has never tried to collect anything from him for all these years. The IRS is the collection agency. That's it, period, Forbes magazine or any of these other people are reporting how much Trump earned and how much he paid in taxes, don't know diddly squat.

If the IRS gave Trump a seventy two million dollar refund and has not tried to recoup it in 10 years or eight or five, then it means they've looked at it and they can't find anything irregular about it. But here comes The New York Times. And since nobody can relate to a 72 million dollar refund, why there has to be something illegal about it. But the IRS cannot comment.

The IRS can't call a press conference and say, we've looked at the president's tax returns and we have found no irregularities once. They can't comment on any taxpayer's taxes. That's why when Forbes magazine runs these richest American guys lists and they list somebody and earning ninety five million dollars last year, the IRS. They can't look at what forms. Well, they could if they I mean, if they're going to audit somebody. They they could say to Forbes said that you were not as a as a means of pressure and they cannot cite forms legally.

Forbes has nothing to do with taxes or tax collection or tax audits. Neither does anybody else in the journalism business. So the fact that the IRS has not sought any repayment, now Trump is under audit and they might at some point down the road, but they haven't in all of these years, that's all anybody would have to know. But that's not the purpose, grab audio, sound bite number 30. This is A.B. Stoddard.

Today on Andrea Mitchell, there are disaffected Trump Republicans who are disappointed in the federal response to the virus, who are struggling financially, who are telling pollsters they don't think that the president is trying to bring the country together. Voters that were potentially in Trump's coalition, they voted for him in 2016. Maybe they're with him in 2017 and 2018, and he's beginning to lose that. His coalition is shrinking. And those are the kinds of voters, if they're already disappointed with President Trump and they're not just a member of his ever loyal base, then this kind of story, the revelations from The New York Times certainly, I think will factor into their decision.

She hopes she doesn't know diddly squat. A.B. Stoddard is claiming that there's a bunch of non bass, trump Republican voters, trump voters, but they're not in the base, meaning they're not white hayseed hicks and members of a cult. And this story about the fact this is going to turn them off, this is going to lose them. That's what she's hoping. And therefore, that's what she turns around and and is reporting. Those are the kinds of voters, if they're already disappointed with Trump at this.

And that's that's why they did the story. They're still trying to bust up Trump's based coalition, whatever it is.

And we got to take a break. We'll do that. Be right back after this.

Hang tough, man. Oh, man. Fest is three hours in media. Two hours are already fehmi in the can in broadcast parlance. But we have a big exciting broadcast. Our remaining lots to get to, including more of your phone calls. So just sit tight and be patient because we're going to be back.

Wait, time flies won't be back here before you even know it.

My friend is having more fun than a human being. Should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh blessed to be here each and every day behind the golden EIB microphone. Blessed to be with you each and every day that we are here together. I do not take it for granted at all. Great to be here. Phone number, if you want to be on the program, is 800 202 to eight to the e-mail address, Inrush, Rushmore and EIB net dot U.S..

So Joe Biden, who is eagerly awaiting tomorrow night's debate. At the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland and by the way. Trump says that he is dead serious about this drug test for Biden. Now, what drugs would it be if you've got a guy who suffers from Alzheimer's, early onset maybe, or they say dementia? What what could you. Prescribe somebody to help with prescribe one, could you give somebody? That get them through two to three hours.

Well, don't even need that. Yeah, you would, because you'd have to give them that. You have to give them the medicine sometime before the debate. So you say two to three hours of debates, 90 minutes. What drugs would you give somebody if you want them to be able to mask and cover up the fact that they have got some mental. Slowness like dementia or early onset Alzheimer's, what would you give them? Well, I would think that something to do with what drugs are given to kids or people with ADHD.

Or a federal. And what does Adderall do? Come on, don't be afraid to tell me what it does. Nobody knows who's answering me here. What does that role do? OK, well, what would be the secondary? It helps people focus. Well, it deals with people who have hyper kinetic energy, right? I mean, in terms of kids, it helps to focus and so forth. Biden does not have hyper kinetic energy. But I'm not I'm not I'm not I'm not disputing I don't know, the reason I'm asking is Trump is is maintaining he's dead serious about this.

Let me find it here. Trump not joking about debate drug tests for Biden are going to be at the Cleveland Clinic. I imagine you could do a test there. President Trump said yesterday he was not joking about the need for a drug test before the first debate with with Plug's Biden. Trump said he watched previous Democratic debates where Biden was clearly out of it, but that he appeared much better during the final primary debate with Bernie Sanders. Trump said he was OK.

I mean, he wasn't great, he wasn't terrible, but he was OK. People say he was on performance enhancing drugs. A lot of people have said that. A lot of people have written that.

A lot of people have said it. Everybody knows a lot of people have said it. The Trump is maintaining that they were dead serious, by the way, Dick Durbin has come out and said Hillary Clinton was wrong to tell Biden not to concede. In a stunning surprise, Dick Durbin actually rebuked Hillary Clinton yesterday for saying that Biden should never concede the election Durbin was on this week. Which is the Clinton war room run by George Stephanopoulos on ABC. And he disagreed with the comment Hillary made last night, last month, he said, I disagree with Hillary, I respect her.

I like her. But I think she just flat out wrong, if you notice, there's a technique. The way you get away with being critical, oh, I love Hillary Clinton, I have so much respect for Hillary. I really like her, but I think she's dead wrong about this. That's how you give yourself cover. I sense I've learned this. That's how you give yourself cover whenever you want to rip somebody. When you want to ridicule somebody, when you want to really ripped to shreds.

You start out by how much you like them and how much you respect them. But on this, you just don't see it that way. Durbin says a Hillary was just flat out wrong. Those are very bold words from Durbin who wouldn't have dared say anything like this three years ago.

So I think. That Durbin openly distancing himself with Hillary. This and this is a big deal, by the way, you have Hillary Clinton out there advising. Plug's never to concede. And here comes Durbin saying, nah, nah, nah, that's wrong.

You know what that tells me? And it may be no great revelation to you, but it tells me that in the Democrat Party, she's toast. She has had it, she no longer has this in her own mind imagined position of power and respect if Biden is willing.

To so publicly. Disagree with that. This is a serious claim. Don't concede that's going to be a major part of the of the strategy. So I think I think this is.

One little moment in time. Where a powerful and prominent Democrat is seeking to discard Hillary Clinton from the Democrat Party, at least from the Democrats power base, Biden has been off the campaign trail more than a third of September. On Saturday, Biden's handlers called another lead on the campaign at nine 930 a.m.. That's a lid on all public activities, it marked the tenth time in September that they have closed Biden down, which is more than one third of the month.

Biden said on Wednesday that he would be heavily prepping for the debate. Now, Trump isn't taking time, but you know what, Trump had a rally. Saturday night after introducing. In naming Amy Connie Barrett, Trump got on the plane and flew to Pennsylvania for a rally. And there were tens of thousands of people there. That's another similarity, by the way, folks, to 2016, we went through all the similarities in the first hour of the program today, another similarity is the crowds at Trump route, why they're even bigger.

The crowds, if it can be believed, are even larger than they were. Back in 2016, it just it just. It seems really odd for everything to be identical, the polling. The media coverage, everything is identical, the only thing said to be different this time is that Biden's going to win in a landslide, which is what they said about Hillary. By the way, Delaware State University is denying that Biden was ever a student. A video from last October has resurfaced in which Biden claimed this was right before the South Carolina primary, that he started out at the historically black college Delaware State.

Now, the reason this is important is because South Carolina is what saved Plug's his campaign. That is where James Clyburn of the Congressional Black Caucus made it official and endorsed Biden and thereby made it look like Biden was the sole recipient of the Civil Rights Coalition endorsement. All the civil rights of the NAACP, the NAACP, the Noble RCP, any number of the civil rights coalitions were all behind Biden. It turns out that he told a whopper of a lie.

That he got started. At Delaware State, Delaware State is an historically black college. The problem is that Delaware State says Biden never attended their. He only went to the school to give a speech long after he was a senator. So it could well be folks that Biden might have won the Democrat nomination by winning South Carolina, thanks in part to Ally. Which is fitting given Biden's career. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has scolded the media for failing to report on the FBI and the dossier news that happened late last week.

Maria Bartiromo. And I've got I've got egg on my face here because I was wrong about this. Yesterday morning in the Fox News Channel on her program, Maria Bartiromo. Said that her sources are now saying they no longer expect John Durham to release a report.

On the FBI's Russia probe, they do not expect there to be an interim report even. And Bartiromo said it's unlikely we won't get a John Durham interim report or any indictments before the election. Now, just thirty seven days away, a debate has begun within the Department of Justice as the timing of Durham's criminal investigation conclusions. I'm being told by sources it's now too close to the election and could be seen as politically motivated. Now, I understand that they knew that going in.

I think this is absolute nonsense. For starters, this this rule about not interfering in elections was created by Eric Holder for crying out loud in a memo. There's no regulation against this, there's no regulation at the Department of Justice. We can't announce indictments and we can't we can't do anything unless we close the election, lest it be thought that we are. POLYNICE There's not no regulation preventing this. But more importantly, it's preposterous to withhold information on a candidate before an election.

That's that that is far more election interference and releasing the actual facts would ever be. I told everybody in this audience and I thought there would be indictments before the election and I've been wrong, and I thought I thought that because of the confidence I had in the attorney general, I know I know a lot of your rush.

You should have known the deep state's not going to go out and kill itself. I know all that. I, I just I just misjudged this, I, I also believe that they think, look, the two sides are just different. The Democrats wouldn't be stopped by this. Everything the Democrats have been done has been done to to effect the outcome of an election election. Ling. That is what the Democratic Party has become. They are the official medlar of elections.

That's all they do. They either impeach the president, they conduct investigations of the president, they announce investigations, they lie about their impeachment, they have hearings, they have phony hearings. And everything a Democrat Party does is to affect the outcome of the election, including using their political power, such as Adam Schiff and his committee to investigate Trump, the impeachment phone call in Ukraine, you name it. Whereas our side well, we we must be very guarded.

We must be very careful not to be seen as being overtly political in our pursuits here.

We we we must not have our.

That result ever be tainted by the charge that it's entirely political?

I'm sorry, there's no way that isn't going to happen. You announce your investigation and you have your indictments two weeks after the election or two weeks after the election is known, the results and they're still going to say. That it's all political. But we apparently we still have people who are convinced. That the way to reach the hearts and minds of American people is to go by the book at all times. And the paragons of virtue and utmost, in fairness and so forth, the American people will see, the American people will see.

Exactly who the virtuous party is and they will all side with us. You wait, you wait and see. We do not want to deal with this allegation of what we've done here is politik, hell's bells. Everything about this is political. What would you call a refusal to accept the election results in 2016? What would you what this coup attempt? There wasn't anything substantive legal about it.

Every bit of it was illegal.

Lindsey Graham says that the Senate Judiciary Committee will approve Amy CONI Barrett on October 22nd. He was on Maria Bartiromo yesterday, said that the Senate Judiciary Committee will approve Barritt on October 22nd. This is after the hearings. He said, we'll have a day of introduction, we'll have two days of questioning Tuesday and Wednesday and on the 15th of October we will begin to markup. They will hold it over for a week and we'll report her nomination out of the committee on October 22nd.

So it sounds like there's only going to be two days of questioning. But this is for two days of questioning, it's not even October yet. This is September 28th, two days of questioning, and we're going to go all the way to October 22nd to get all this done.

October 22nd, you know, it's getting dangerously close to the election. What if somebody comes along and says you can't announce the results of the committee, you can't. You've got to wait till after the election. Now, this is so close, the election is going to be affecting the outcome. Well, you wouldn't announce anything that Durham's done because you didn't want to be accused of tainting the results and being political. Well, what would you call this?

I guess he's somebody making this complaint.

Anyway, I got to take a break, folks will we'll do that, we'll come back and continue and we'll get back to the phones right after this talent more intelligent than I will ever need, in fact.

On loan from God and we head back to the phones, this Joshua, Joshua, Columbus, Ohio, great to have you. Glad you waited. Hello, sir.

Hi there, Rusty. I'm so glad to get to talk to you. You are one of my personal heroes. I just want to say that. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.

Earlier in your show, you had a caller who said that Trump should not be fighting back in these debates. He should be unemotional and take some sort of moral high ground. And once I heard that, I just wanted to make sure I called in and tell you how I flatly disagree with that.

That caller was suggesting that Trump not come off as a bully. I can tell you where that that caller thinks that Biden is incapacitated. Biden is not mentally all there. That might be Biden's going to come off as somebody who's helpless and vulnerable. And it would be really, really bad if Mr. Orangeman came out, just pummeled him into the ground.

I believe that Trump's success is when he does fight back. I think Republicans and conservatives like people that will actually stand up for conservative values like yourself, like Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin or Candice Owens or Trump himself. And people were craving these voices from the American people that are standing up against this leftist crap.

Well, I yeah, I appreciate being included in that list of warriors I took it took me a while to figure it out, but you're exactly you're exactly right, because most Republican voters, if they're frustrated with anything, it's the people they elect, don't fight back and don't even stand up for themselves, much less fight back. And Trump does.

And despite whatever odds, despite whatever allegation comes his way, no matter how apparently or seemingly insignificant he is, he fights back against it. He will do what like he can. Well, when you think of this, what would you think if Trump in this debate decided, since I think it's correct that Biden is going to be attacking Trump every question, he's not going to answer the question, going to attack Trump. What would you think of Trump saying?

You know what? And I'm sick and tired of you people claiming that. I said there are good people among the Nazis at Charlottesville. What would you think about Trump getting specific and refuting some of the lies that Biden has been telling about him?

I think it's absolutely appropriate. I think that we don't think it'll come off as too defensive.

No, I think that that's absolutely appropriate every attack he uses. I think that when Biden gets nasty, it will turn voters off to him. And when Trump defends himself, it will turn voters on to Trump. And the more they attack Trump, the stronger he gets.

Well, I want to ask you a quick question. Do you remember Biden's debate with Paul Ryan in 2012? He's Mitt Romney's running mate. Do you remember those debates?

Exactly. I do. What do you remember about it in 20 seconds? What do you remember?

Well, there was a sit down debate and it was all very kind of, you know, informal and, you know, no, I'm sorry to interrupt you, but it's only because of time.

Biden was exactly who you claim he is. Paul Ryan was Mr. Policy Wonk, and he was attempting to very politely and calmly explain policy wonk ism to voters. Biden, in the meantime, was insulting. He attacked. He went after Ryan as a neophyte. Nobody didn't know anything about anybody or anything. It was exactly the Biden you described here, but it did not hurting.

It made Ryan look ineffective. Ladies and gentlemen, there is a form of self protection you need these days, it's to look after yourself and your online identity. Now, a dozen years ago, this wasn't even in your consideration set. You have to worry about it. But today it's more apparent than ever that you do need it. And life locks online. Identity theft protection helps you defend yourself. When an online cyber hacker gets a hold of your online ID, it could be in the form of your credit cards, could be your Social Security number, your birth date or your address.

You see, with any of that information, an online thief or bad guy can set up a bogus account, pretend to be you, and make off with considerable sums of money before you even suspect anything's gone awry. Now, LifeLock offers you online identity theft protection to combat just that. Once you become a LifeLock member, they set up online protections that look for your data in the wrong hands, and if it is, they will know and then they let you know and then steps can be taken.

Now, they're not monitoring you personally, they're monitoring online transactions, they're looking for patterns of illegal online behavior or abnormal spending patterns that they know you do not by habit engage in. You know, this is discovered much more often than you think, and it's a good majority of the time. It's not your fault. Your data has been stolen from a database of a business, for instance, or your phone's been subject to malware without you knowing it.

LifeLock is your answer now, no one company can prevent all identity theft, but life locks online protections coupled with their restoration team efforts combined for the most effective coverage I know of, sign up today, get a free scan of your data on the dark web. I mean, that's where it is. If you're if your data is on the dark web, then you can you can know that you've been hacked, stolen. You don't want it. Then they'll give you a free scan when you sign up at LifeLock dot com slash scan.

That's the website to sign up. Now, use my name, get twenty five percent off. That hasn't changed, but LifeLock dot com slash scan and they will see if you happen to be on the dark web. Meaning if your stuff's been stolen and is there for sale again. LifeLock dot com slash scan. Make sure to use my name back to the phones. Robert in Houston. Hello, sir. You're on the EIB Network.

Hi. Hello, thanks for taking my call. I'm a longtime listener and one who is praying for your complete recovery. Well, I appreciate that very much, sir.

Thank you very much. Yeah, we will miss you so much. My question is that Trump should use the debate as an opportunity to attack the mainstream media and to challenge the mainstream media. Demand that Biden give some direct answers to questions that every American would like answered by Joe Biden, such as Senator Biden's business dealings in China and the Ukraine, why he won't release a partial list of people he would consider nominating to the Supreme Court. Why didn't the Obama Biden administration do more to stop violence in Chicago and other Democratic controlled cities?

Why didn't Biden do more to help the black community? What would Biden have done different in February and March to stop coronavirus and there's many more questions that could be brought and you got to be careful here.

This is see this? This is exactly my point. You you are please don't misunderstand. You are asking the questions that you think Biden should be forced to answer because he's getting away with not answering. But I'm going to tell you what's going to happen.

What would you have done differently about covid? Biden will hit that out of the park by all he has to do. Well, I wouldn't have done what the president did. There wouldn't be two hundred thousand Americans dead, Bengoa. That's all he's got to say. You got to be real careful how you formulate these questions. That's what Chris Wallace is there to do. You got to be on the lookout for how Biden is set up. To go out and attack Trump or how Biden is going to be set up to have to defend himself.

But that question, what would you have done differently? You know, that's that's a defensive question, just awaiting a grand slam. Hit it out of the park. Answer from Biden. You got to be I know it's frustrating. Biden's not answering these questions. I know it's frustrating. Biden's getting away with it's frustrating. The media's not forcing him to answer as frustrating as all hell.

Any question of Joe Biden has to contain in it an allegation itself of incompetence or having done something wrong or not knowing what he was doing or what have you as an open ended, or what would you have done differently?

Well, the first thing is there wouldn't be 200000 Americans dead.

And the next thing we wouldn't be talking about a vaccine when everybody knows that we're not anywhere near a vaccine, can't go this open ended route business.

It looked the same thing holds for Trump, he's got to be very careful. In fact, I think asking Biden any kind of question. That is rooted in, well, what would you have done that Trump has never how would you have done it better? What is a mistake? To be asked the questions that Biden needs to be asked, needs to be asked about his specific policy. I like, for example, your question, why won't you reveal the names on your Supreme Court list?

Why won't you reveal what your plans are with taxes or this or that or what are your plans with with taxes? But I just want to prepare all of you that if this debate happens, every Biden answer is going to start with whatever my plan is. It sure isn't going to be as bad as what we've had the past three and a half years. Every answer is going to be a flat out straight on attack on Donald Trump, professionally, personally, policy wise.

It's going to be that first, second and third Biden will never get around to answering any substantive policy questions, he won't do it. His policies about what they're going to be. Unless he's given, you know, a hanging curveball question about it, Robert, thank you. This is Kelly in Redding, California. Great to have you on the EIB Network.

Hello. Thank you. Good to be here. Yes. I just have to say, after listening to a couple of your callers telling Trump who he has to be, that he has the right. Pro-life Catholic woman, I want to say, married 41 years, not trump the Trump boom trump be the Trump we saw in 2016, the trump we see in Pennsylvania on the stump in Ohio, the truth teller, the bombastic truth teller. That's who I want to see tomorrow night.

I want him to be Trump.

You want to see the bombastic truth teller. That's who I want to see you.

You don't want to see any adjustments made by virtue of having been president for four years.

No, I don't tell us the truth. I don't care how painful it is for the other side or for us. I want the truth. Right? Well, no, no, no.

I'm not suggesting you not tell the truth, but he's not an outsider anymore. He's been there. He's got he's got a record now. He didn't have a record three years ago or four years ago when he was when he was. He's got a record that he can proudly defend. Absolutely.

And I love his record. I love the way he goes after things. I love it. And when people say to me, I wish he'd tone things down, counting down, he's not a proper politician. That's because he isn't. That's right. Well, look, I agree with you.

I agree with you. And you don't want Trump to be defensive. That's that's what she means, folks. When she says she wants Trump to be Trump, she don't want this defensive stuff. She doesn't want Trump accepting any advice. He's got to tone it down here and make it nice over here. And he's got to dial it back over that. No, Trump doesn't dial it back. Trump doesn't make a joke. If if Joe Biden shows up and is incompetent, then that's what's going to be displayed.

If Joe Biden shows up and is incompetent, that's what Donald Trump is going to highlight. We're talking about the presidency here. You know, this isn't the blue haired Bloody Mary gang in the annual PTO meeting. This is for the most powerful position in the world, and if one of the guys seeking the job is not up to it mentally, that needs to be exposed to hell with feelings here. I know exactly what you're saying out there, Kelly, and you're just you're hearing people that are scared to death of the media, who believe that Trump can, by virtue of his behavior, make the media less critical, not make the media less mean spirited.

Yeah, there's there's no way I'm glad you called my friends.

A few companies inspire as many copycats as Boehland Branch has. Now, you know them, the maker of luxury sheets and bedding, all manufactured with a pure organic cotton, it makes their products softer and more luxurious than any one else in their category and their success.

Right here on this program has spawned one imitator after another, but, you know, nothing stands up to the test of their comfort and luxury. Boldon brand sheets arrive soft. They only get softer over time and they continue to be number one for a reason. And that is quality. You're able to order these sheets online. They ship them directly to your home. That eliminates the middleman. It passes along a lot of savings to it's how they're able to sell these things so inexpensively.

Sheets of this quality might go for as much as a thousand dollars at a high end department store, but you can get a Boehland branch set of sheets for just a couple hundred bucks. After a promo code discount that I'll share with you and one of the other benefits of establishing a direct relationship with you is that Boehland Branch offers you a 39 money back guarantee. That'd be tough to do if you were buying these things retail. They want you to try them for a full month.

They want you to be sure that they are what they are advertised to be, the softest, most comfortable set of sheets that you've ever slept on. And if that's not the case, if you don't think that after a month, then you can ship them back and they will give you a full refund.

That's how confident they are in their products. Bowl Anabranch sheets enjoyed by three U.S. presidents, along with hundreds of thousands of other Americans. A website. Boehland branch dot com b o, l, l and branch dot com. Make sure to use my name as the promo code. You get fifty dollars off your first set of sheets and there is free shipping as well.

Bowl and brand, dot com.

Look, I want to remind you of one thing. The debate between Joe Biden and Paul Ryan in 2012. You know, Mitt Romney was president. He chose Ryan. We were all excited about that. And then they had the debate, the one vice presidential debate. And Ryan showed up as a policy wonk. He had the notebook open and he had a pencil in his ear. And he was attempting to explain what the Romney Ryan ticket was about, policy wonk wise.

And the I forget even who the moderator was, the moderator was asked what kind of questions and Ryan was was was I don't know, appeared to be uncomfortable, didn't didn't really quite.

I don't know I don't know how to describe it, but but he kept saying, no, no, no, what we're saying is that if you if you if you take the parts over here from Medicare Part B, A to Z and you moving over here to Medicare Part C, and what we're saying is Will and Biden people are forgotten. Biden just went in and destroyed Ryan.

He attacked him personally. He called him incompetent. He said he wasn't prepared. You're too young. You don't even know what this town is like. Give me a break. He kept him on a break. You don't know you don't even know what you're talking about. And let me tell you something, folks. The sympathy. Did not transfer to Ryan, people did not think Biden had been mean to him, people did not think Biden had been over that.

After a while, Biden kind of figured out that he was overplaying it. He was expecting. Somebody to be I look, I don't want a character, I'm just telling you, Biden realized after a while that he didn't have to be nearly as a hit piece. Oriented in order to prevail here, but he was and I just want to know what my point is, that Trump ought not back off of Biden for whatever reason, because it's not going to redound, wouldn't it?

So sweet how nice the president was to the vice president Biden. Everybody knows Biden sic and Trump doesn't work that way in politics, folks.

Here is here's Devin in Harrisonburg, Virginia. Great to have you on the program.

Hi. Hey. Make a deal, a prayers for us. Thank you, Debbie. I am a black Trump supporter. I believe that there's more of us out there, more black in the black community than they believe. But I just wanted to make two quick points here. Oh, I think Trump's a hammer down how Joe Biden has kept the black community in poverty, too. When he told Charlamagne the God, you ain't black if you don't vote for me.

I think that's very offensive and racist.

You know something? I think you're exactly right, especially you. I'm glad you reminded me of this year that Biden has kept African-Americans in poverty is exactly right. African-Americans have been complaining to the Democrat Party about the same things for fifty years, while the Democrats have been promising to fix those things.

Nothing ever gets fixed, nothing ever gets improved. Nope, nope, not nothing. I mean, I follow people like Kandace, who owns the stuff that really wakes you up and lets you see the light of day. But this is he. His policies are horrible. They've kept us in poverty, lost all our jobs, is messed up, tore up our community.

There's no question in all of that is true. And then they take you for granted when election day shows up, they just assume that you're going to be just like Biden said to my old buddy Charlamagne, to God, if you ain't voted for me, you ain't black.

Remember that, folks, you ain't voting for me, you ain't black. By the way, the moderator of the Paul Ryan Joe Biden debate was Martha Radish.

I'm sorry, Rabbit.

I just think, you know, I think vegetable when I look at her, Martha Raddatz of ABC News and like the headline from the U.K. Guardian, Joe Biden's alpha male display leaves Paul Ryan overwhelmed.

Nobody felt sorry for Ryan after Biden destroyed him in that debate.

I'm not going to ask Joe Biden to visit Traverse City, Michigan, Tuesday on a northern Michigan campaign swing. And you imagine if Melania was traveling the various stage managed Manjula, the media be saying about that in the fact that Jill Biden is going means that plug's can't. And it also means that their internals are showing them things that the drive bys are not reporting. See you tomorrow, folks. See you right back here.

Hey, everybody is J.A. Caldwell. You may know me as a political analyst on national TV, but today I'm here to tell you about my new podcast series OutLoud with Giono Caldwell, the sworn enemy of PC culture, which I know isn't very PC to say these days. But that's why I'm here. I'll interview national newsmakers from all walks of life, internationally renowned guests from across the political spectrum and real people like you discussing real issues on culture and politics, as well as the controversies that have social media blazing.

You know, the kinds of controversies that may get me in trouble if the mob ever finds out. Well, I grew up on the south side of Chicago.

I'm not afraid of a liberal mob. They should be afraid of me.

Listen to Out Loud with General Caldwell launching October 5th on the I Heart radio app, Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast. That's out loud. Reggiano Cauldwell, launching October 5th on the I Heart radio app, Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast.

Kandace Owens just knocked out Cardi B and poked the biggest hole yet in the stranglehold entertainment and media have on the minds of black voters in this country. I'm Rob Smith and all the next episode of Rob Smith is problematic. We are going to break down why the left uses idiots to reach black America and how Candice Owens just put them all on notice that they cannot do it anymore. Listen to Rob Smith is problematic on the radio app, on Apple podcasts and wherever you get your podcasts.