Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Mark Levin, our number is eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one 877 three eight one three eight one one.

These issues involving Hunter Biden and James Biden really are issues involving Joe Biden. You're going to want to watch my show on Sunday, Life, Liberty and Levine at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, I have Peter Schweizer for the entire hour. Nobody knows more about the Bidens and nobody knows more about this scandal than Peter Schweizer, he was the first to interview Bob Wolinsky for four and a half hours.

He's been on this trail for years, and so we will have an exclusive interview this Sunday for the full hour, an hour long form interview with Peter Schweizer and it will be a wide ranging interview.

And in the end. Literally, the buck stops with Joe Biden. The idea that Joe Biden's son. Has been under investigation. For tax fraud and SEC fraud. For two years by a grand jury and that Joe Biden didn't know about it. Is a lie. It's not possible. The idea that Joe Biden's brother. Is under investigation by the U.S. attorney's office in the western district of Pennsylvania. Involving a bankrupt hospital there. The idea that Joe Biden didn't know about that is a lie.

We also have Bob Wolinsky, a serious witness, a serious man. First interviewed by Peter Schweizer for several hours. And Schweizer's written about this. And he points out and there's email, there is contemporary documentary evidence and Bob Wolinsky is a material witness. There, Joe Biden new. About financial deals with China. And the Joe Biden, the boss, the top guy. In one of these deals was to get 10 percent. 10 percent. I want to thank the United States media for creating.

On top of an existing constitutional crisis, another constitutional crisis. If there was justice. There would be now already an impeachment committee pulled together just in case Joe Biden manages to become president of the United States. That's exactly what was demanded by the media and the Democrats. Before Donald Trump. Was inaugurated and Donald Trump hadn't done anything. Anything they had to create a special counsel to investigate Donald Trump, there were no ongoing U.S. attorney investigations, grand jury investigations of Donald Trump or his family members.

Period. And so the issue here isn't Hunter Biden. Listen to me carefully, because I'm trying to lay this out. And the backbencher's in, the others will pick up on this and should the issue of Joe Biden. Communist China is going to have a seat in every meeting at every table. Should Joe Biden become president of the United States? In the form of Joe Biden, the individuals that Joe Biden would like to sit around that table with him are all China appeasers, every single one.

Premise suggested Secretary of state has suggested director of National Intelligence. His suggested national security adviser and his suggested secretary of education. No wonder communist China was rooting for Joe Biden in this election. Now it's going to take brave people, a relative handful in the media and in the counter media like this show. To continue to press this issue. Because we already see, thanks to our friends at Marsi News Busters, that the major television networks. Quickly did a hit and run.

30 seconds, 45 seconds. And then moved on. This was the other night. We already see Mr. Potato Head, a.k.a. BP's Brian Stelter Helter-Skelter at CNN. Who is Jeff Zucker's? Most reliable lapdog. Attack Fox for daring to cover this issue. Let's be honest, the Democrat Party is in bed with communist China, whether it's Dianne Feinstein or Nancy Pelosi, whether it's Swalwell, whether it's their billionaire backers from Wall Street and the other corporatists. Bloomberg, whether it's the media that Thomas Friedman's and his ilk.

And the fraud's on CNN and MSNBC, New York Times and Washington Post and all the rest of them. Special pleaders for communist China, how dare you call this virus the Chinese virus, said a reporter for NPR. Isn't that racist? The media mouthpieces for a genocidal communist regime wouldn't be the first time. Just as FDR kissed up to Adolf Hitler. Early on in the rise of the Third Reich. Yes, now it would appear Biden should he become president.

Is kissing up to a. Radical Marxist genocidal regime in communist China. The entire Democrat Party. Infrastructure and support mechanism from Hollywood to corporate on Wall Street. Colleges and universities wholly owned by the Communist Party in China, you look at the NBA, LeBron James just got an award. For opposing voter suppression. History will not judge LeBron James well, if it judges him at all. He has defended slavery and genocide in China. If not directly, as a matter of fact, putting his dollars and sneakers over the lives of.

A wiggers Muslims in China, not once have I heard him defend them, not once have I heard him plead for them, not once. LeBron James is nothing but a partisan Democrat, that's all he is. Period. And so we see now. The problems with early voting people voting well in advance of having knowledge, we see what happens to a republic. When we have a thoroughly corrupt media, a media that is an appendage of a thoroughly corrupt political party, the Democrat Party.

You shouldn't be surprised anymore. That more and more Democrats support communist China. Over the Republican United States, never defend capitalism, they call themselves Democrats socialism. Actually defend Chinese allies. Like Iran, where they want to give them billions of dollars and and reignite that deal like the Palestinians in the Middle East. And all over the world. I told you before the election that our enemies were rooting for Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Whether in Tehran or Beijing.

Whether in Moscow or Havana. Our enemies. Wanted Joe Biden as president and certainly Kamala Harris, vice president. Our enemies, what the Democrats, they control the House and the Senate and the presidency, our enemies want the fifth column, the Democrat Party, the fifth column in this country to weaken us and undermine us from within. Whether it's our energy sector. Whether it's our steel sector assembly lines. Smoke chimney factories. It doesn't matter. Hello, us out from within, and you better believe the communist Chinese are behind this whole climate change nonsense.

Man made climate change. They don't give a damn. I think it's terrific. And so these lawsuits, these battles that are going on. They're degraded and the people who bring them are diminished. Whether it's the pseudo conservative reprobates at National Review. Whether it's the low IQ teenagers at meteorite, whether it's the Soros funded hack jobs over there at the. Media Matters, or whether it's the same hackneyed. Reprobate media in our own country. They always seem to be on the wrong side, don't they?

More when I return, I'll be right back. Much love in. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings. While Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over one hundred and seventy five years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government. And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs.

Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference. At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide.

So during this season of Blessings Hillsdale, thank you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country to learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Live in for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Let me be as clear as I know, I know how Joe Biden lied to us over and over and over again. The media lied to us over and over and over again, the Democrat Party lied to us over and over and over again. Now we're just supposed to roll over the American people.

The Democrat Party, one of the state's. And corruptly. And corruptly. Change the rules. Now, why would you have a party going to the states to get rid of signatures on ballots, to get rid of signature comparisons on ballots, to get rid of postmarks on ballots? To count votes after the deadline, why would a political party seek to do that? Because they seek to destroy the two party system. The Democrat Party is an authoritarian party, it is a totalitarian party, it was during the Confederacy, it was during segregation and it is today.

You have mouthpieces in that party who are bought and paid for by the communist Chinese, you have mouthpieces in our media. That cutting up to the communist Chinese like Thomas Friedman. Among others. Among many others. Our country is filled with tens of thousands of students from the communist Chinese regime. You think they're here to learn English? Certainly not all of them. Our laboratories have been compromised, Hollywood's been compromised. Our corporations have been compromised. They see one point four billion people and they salivate.

Are universities and colleges have been compromised. Maybe that's why Marxism is so broadly embraced in our colleges, in the NBA. And corporate America and Wall Street and in the Democrat Party. Notice the rising stars, so-called in the Democrat Party, neo Marxists and Marxists. Notice their treatment in the American media, praised and promoted. Unbelievable. They never defend capitalism. They attack our founding exactly what the Chinese communists want. Attack your own foundling, attack your own history, attack your own culture, attack your own society.

Brainwash, indoctrinate, breed, people who hate capitalism, who are pulling down monuments of American heroes, not all heroes. We understand the Confederacy, but American heroes, Washington, Lincoln Grant. Even abolitionists. Even statues of black men who fought on the union side in the civil war pull them all down. Their car, they bought and paid for LeBron James, look at they bought and paid for it for the NBA. Taking nees. Against law and order taking knees, oh, it's not about the flag, it's not about the national anthem.

Think about the old Soviet Union. Think about the old Soviet Union. Can you imagine if the Democrats had nominated somebody to run for president, the United States, with the ties to the old Soviet Union that Biden has to the communist Chinese? Would that be shocking or that Biden has announced in advance that if he becomes president, he's got a whole cabinet full? Of communist Chinese appeasers just waiting and by the way, Islam on Nazi Iran appeasers. This was repeated today by one of my colleagues on TV, but as I've been saying behind the radio microphone here.

Why do you think Bloomberg and these billionaires and corporate America were backing by and against Trump? Because of their ties, their businesses in China are their desires to do business in China, one point four billion dollars, a billion potential customers, as I pointed out the other day. We say a lot here that's repeated. OK. I'm proud I don't repeat what other people have to say, think for yourselves. Think for yourselves. The Democrat Party is corrupt, that's always been corrupt.

It's always been corrupt.

He rejects Americanism, Tommy, any leading Democrat today who speaks up for the founding fathers, who speaks up for the Declaration of Independence, even though multiple references to God, our creator, how many of them speak up for the Constitution now? None of them use it to advance their cause, but they never defend it. I'll be right back. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings, while Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government.

And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs. Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference.

At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide. So during this season of Blessings, Hillsdale thanks you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country. To learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

You can call us now at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one and the liberal contact number is eight seven seven three eight one thirty eight eleven, while the United States Supreme Court has struck again two short paragraphs.

It has rejected the case from Texas and 18 states says Texas has no standing, I'm paraphrasing it says The manner in which these other states, these four states conducted their elections is not really. Well, I'll put it plain, it's not Texas's business. Now, some conservatives have argued this and the Supreme Court's taking him up on this. The problem with this, ladies and gentlemen, is. You have widespread institutionalized corruption of violations of Article two, Section one, clause two of the United States Constitution that cases before the court and they let it die.

You had another case before the court that said, wait a minute, the legislature violated its own constitution.

You can't violate its own constitution when selecting electors.

For the federal offices of president and vice president of the United States, the Supreme Court in one sentence said we're rejecting your emergency appeal, then Texas with 18 states and says, OK, Supreme Court, look, we got four states here that change the rules at the last moment to help Biden and the Democrats.

That violates the equal protection clause for the other states and causes other issues that they raise. And the court says you don't have any standing because what goes on in the other states is basically none of Texas's business. That's where we are. And what all of this means, despite what all these so-called experts say and right, they're all getting behind their keyboards now, right.

As I said here, and I quote myself and I linked to myself and as I said here, what all of this means is. The institutionalized corruption and fraud by the states. Whether it's Republicans. And the state legislature in Pennsylvania that violated their own constitution, whether it's the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that not only violated the Constitution, but then went ahead and changed election laws to comport with what the Biden campaign wanted, whether it's Georgia in which the signature requirement was changed because the secretary of state there, a Republican buckle buckled and to Tracy and and change the signature requirements there or whether it's these other states.

The Supreme Court says there's no relief. There's nothing you can do about. There's nothing he can do about it now, let me ask you a question. If these were Democrat lawsuits. And the Democrats control the United States Senate today, what would they be doing, Mr.. They would be changing the Supreme Court, wouldn't they? They wouldn't tolerate this, they wouldn't put up with it. They wouldn't tolerate this, they wouldn't put up with it.

You know, my first book was called Men in Black. How the Supreme Court is destroying America. Many of you call the program or the you you comment on my various social sites and you say take it to court, take it to court, take it to court. So let's say you take it to court and this happens, I don't need to hear any commentary from. Kids in their 20s who know nothing about the Supreme Court and nothing who know nothing about the law, I don't need to hear any commentary from Never Trampas.

Or just filled with hate and contempt and utterly irrational. Utterly irrational, the Supreme Court gave this virtually no attention. Virtually no attention. The original article talks about. The legislature's acting within their lawful bounds, taking action. They gave it 18 words. The Article two violations where you have a court and a governor and a secretary of state. Who are changing the laws illegally, but changing the laws for elections? Within weeks of the election in Pennsylvania and the Supreme Court.

In the form of Alito takes it up, issues a warning. A warning to the secretary of state twice to segregate the ballots and then we never hear from them again. We never hear from them again. So we have a breakdown of law and order and a breakdown of our constitutional order, and don't let these people who beat their chests and say the court did exactly the right thing sway you at all.

Because the court did not. And so where are we? I don't need to hear from professor at this one and former federal prosecutor, that one in all this, so forth and so on, we can figure this out ourselves.

We can figure this out ourselves. This country's in very, very deep trouble when one political party can institutionalize its fraud. In order to try and make sure that its candidate wins by hook or by crook by violating Article two of the Constitution.

By violating state law. By making changes at the last minute, all intended to lift. Election protections all intended to enhance the Democrat Party and their candidate, I want to tell you a little secret.

If a Republican president running for re-election and getting almost 75 million votes, 12 million, then he received the first time around when he won and millions and millions more than any other candidate in the history of this country.

If that Republican sitting president can't win. Because an individual that has minor support from the population who barely campaigned. You can get 80 million votes. We can never win the presidency. We can never win the presidency, you don't need law professors and former federal prosecutors to explain this to you. This is obvious. So while at the state level, they can institutionalize fraud. They can eliminate barriers. Turns out that that's perfectly fine. Every time I talk about this, I come under attack from.

Sleazeballs at The Washington Post, a sleazeballs at The New York Times, a sleazeballs elsewhere, because I dare to even discuss this, but understand these people are very totalitarian and fascistic mindset. These people work for news outlets that didn't find the Holocaust newsworthy or news outlets that were propagandists for Joseph Stalin in the 1930s. I can sleep at night. My conscience is clear. I have never, never. Been a mouthpiece for anything of that sort. Nothing.

And so I thought I'd point this out, so here we are, late Friday afternoon, really a Friday evening in the Supreme Court strikes. They wanted to get this off their table so they could enjoy their weekend. We can have these these cases hanging around, and I will tell you this. I don't ever want to talk to a Supreme Court justice again. I want nothing to do with any of them. Period. Period. Nothing, they know who they are and want nothing to do with them.

What the hell good use are they? And I'll be right back. Much love in. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings, while Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government. And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs.

Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference. At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide.

So during this season of Blessings Hillsdale, thank you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country to learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom in for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Well, I want to salute Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito, who did want to hear the case, the conflict of state's case, and here is here's what the Supreme Court at the state of Texas motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article three of the Constitution.

Let me just say this.

How can there be a lack of standing when if there's a conflict between the states? The only way that conflict can be heard is original jurisdiction by the United States Supreme Court.

To me, that is a misuse of the word STANNING. It is. It's like the word latches that was used by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to get around dealing with a constitutional dispute.

Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, quote, In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction, which is the point I just said.

And they said I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill a complaint, but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue. So they would have taken up the case, but they probably would have taken up the case for the purpose of killing it. I should mention, let me tell you the irony here.

The irony is this.

Because the state of Georgia has two races for two Senate seats taking place as I speak. And because the voting process that was in place during the presidential election is still in place and because the secretary of state entered into a consent decree with Stacey Abrams, that weaken the signature requirement, among other things, that process is still there. Texas was challenging that, among other things. So if because of that process, the two Democrats win and they are as radical as they get, they are right, they are hardcore left wing.

Then what happens? 50/50 in the Senate and Kamala Harris, should she be vice president? Is the tie breaking vote because she's president of the Senate as vice president? What did Chuck Schumer say, if they control the Senate and have the presidency in the House? He said he's going to pack the Supreme Court. It's very possible the Supreme Court collectively just slit its own throat. But don't worry, they will have done so with great. Self-respect, self aggrandizement.

In the end. In the end, depending on how the election turns out, the Supreme Court as a group may have just slit its own throat. As they duck one case after another, you still have that Article two case sitting there where Alito said, as I point out to you.

To segregate that, the petitions, the ballots. It's not enough to do anything. So I guess the court still fiddling, still fighting over it. Still not sure what to do. Can't cobble together enough justices to go in one direction or another, which also to keep in mind, ladies and gentlemen. I want you to keep in mind. That the two Trump appointees did not vote. Excuse me, the three Trump appointees did not vote with Thomas and Alito.

The three Trump appointees. Obviously voted with the leftists and John Roberts. Seven to two. That would be Barritt. Cavnar. And Gorsuch. All three. Really quite disgusting, if you think about it. I would encourage you not to listen to the usual buffoons and naysayers, the phony legal analysts and all the rest. They know nothing more than you do. They just. They're predictable. They're very predictable. We have these activist courts in the states like we do in Pennsylvania.

And they can do pretty much whatever they want to do and the Supreme Court basically. By inaction. Has sanctified these activities, so the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania feels emboldened. The lawless elements in the states feel emboldened. And as of today, Article two, Section one, clause two of the Constitution, which says that the legislatures. Shall determine how electors are appointed. Doesn't exist anymore. What this court needs is serious leadership. Like a William Rehnquist.

But instead. It has a little boy. Is very concerned about how Linda Greenhouse and others think of him and write about them. But what's troubling to me is the three Trump appointees fell right in line. That includes Barritt. And Gorsuch and Cavnar. Those of you who fight like hell for these justices. Fight like hell. You're always disappointed, aren't you? The Democrats know where their justices are going, whether it's on a state Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court, they all know.

We're not asking the justices to be result-oriented, we're actually asking them to take up these cases. They refused to take up the Pennsylvania case, they refused to take up the Texas case. They won't even take them to look at the. And in the case of Pennsylvania, did you provide an explanation? You have every reason to be furious. You look at the various aspects of this republic and you say. I support the Constitution. Shouldn't the governor, shouldn't the secretary of state, should the Supreme Court of my state support the Constitution when they don't?

I expect the state legislature when it acts to follow its own constitution. I mean, I'm expected to follow my state's constitution and when they don't. Apparently, there is no remedy, none. This is how you get one party rule in these states and ultimately this is how you get one party rule on the country. The Supreme Court of the United States may have just sealed its own fate. I don't know. We'll see what happens in Georgia. I pray to God we win at least one of those seats.

But if we lose them both and the court itself gave the glide path to a Biden presidency without actually taking up the substance, a very, very serious lawsuits, well, then it would have cut its own throat.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here, he's here. Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Oh, America, Mark Levin here, our number 877 three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Give me an example of what I'm talking about was last hour.

Here's a piece in the Atlanta Journal Constitution linked by Right Scoop.

Federal judge hears a case challenging Georgia voter purges. Now, this is an Obama judge. A federal judge heard arguments. Yesterday from voting rights groups who I guess have standing no matter what, that are challenging the removal of what they said were hundreds of thousands of eligible voters from Georgia's voting rolls last year, U.S. District Judge Stephen Jones, an Obama appointee I looked at up, did not make a ruling Thursday, but said he would release his decision as quick as possible.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in Atlanta by Black Voters Matter Often and the transformative Justice Coalition and the Rainbow Push Coalition attorneys for the secretary of state's office says Jones to dismiss the case in a state of John Lewis.

Dr. Martin Luther King. We stand on the shoulders of great titans. That's Tricia Scoffer, an attorney for Black Voters Matter.

Now you see how leftists are treated when they're petitioners and you see how conservatives are treated when their petition is right.

If one person if two people don't have the ability to vote and were purged improperly, that's one or two people too many in the secretary of state made the mistake. Again, you see how the Atlanta Journal Constitution loads up the front of the article.

Lawyers for the Black Voters Matter often argued that the state removed tens of thousands of voters from the list because it believed they had moved out of their county or the state, when in fact, they had not also challenges a use it or lose it provision in state law that allows Georgia to purge voters who do not cast ballots for many years, you see. The left is always pushing the edge of the envelope and they go in front of friendly judges who take care of them.

And there sits the Supreme Court becoming a joke. John Roberts, so they want those people who are purged returned to the voter rolls. Attorneys for the secretary of state's office said the office followed all federal guidelines on updating voter registration rolls.

And if there were issues with people being removed inappropriately, the plaintiffs had a year to bring their case. All latches, right, Mr. Butler?

Oh, that must be Larches. Voters had almost a year to reregister, said Brian Taison, attorney for the secretary of state's office. The absentee ballots for January five went out on November 21. And so we're now at the point of if we made these changes, now we interfere with an ongoing election. But I can't wait to see how that turns out, the lawsuit. Let's see here. Well, my computer sucks. I just lost the article.

The ACLU has finally awakened and they support, of course, the leftists.

So tell me, why do they always have standing and why do they usually win and how do they usually find the right judges? And how is it that when Obama appoints people, they stand stand firm to the left?

But here we have three Trump appointees, three who couldn't even join Thomas and Alito. And saying, wait a minute, when one state sues another, there's original jurisdiction, we don't have a choice here on the Supreme Court, it's in the Constitution. Well, sure we do.

There's a standing issue showing you there's a latches issue.

Unbelievable, really. It's really. Quite shocking. You know. I want to talk a little bit about this. Let's circle back to this Biden issue. There's a piece by John Hawkins. And this was linked to by Ban China.com. Flashback, Mitt Romney trashes Senate probe in Hunter by an embarrassment. Remember when the Hunter Biden laptop story broke, I certainly do. He writes after writing an article for it on Bongino Dotcom, so he's an author for Bongino.

The lengths the left went to in order to suppress it were remarkable. Right off the bat, Twitter was blocking links to this story. Facebook was promising to reduce the reach of the story and potentially penalize pages that talked about it. Of course, the mainstream press also uniformly did their best to undermine the story and declare there was nothing to it. Embarrassingly, even Mitt Romney told the public there was nothing to see here.

Mitt Romney, of course, now that the election is over and Hunter Biden is being probed by the DOJ, everything is different. Does this prove every claim and allegation made in the Biden laptop story was true?

No, but it does show that all the people saying there was nothing to it were 100 percent wrong. So the story may have come from Trump's campaign, but the sad reality is that's where a lot of stories you see in the mainstream media originate. Some campaign or party does research feeds it to connection with a big outlet. Then the outlets run with the story. Of course, you expect the mainstream media to be hypocrites about this sort of thing, but you don't expect Republican senators to go along with it unless one of them is named Romney.

As to Mitt Romney, the guy has always been a weasel, and although he probably deserves to be a certain amount of slack because Trump went out of his way to humiliate him, he writes, There's a line between not bending over backward to help Trump and siding with Democrats that shouldn't be crossed. You don't shoot down a legitimate story to defend the sleazy son of the Democratic nominee, who's also sleazy, I might add, because Donald Trump hurt your feelings, even Mitt Romney should know better.

So Romney was wrong. Of course, he's always wrong.

He's always wrong. Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal, of course, he was attacking all these lawsuits and attacking the lawyers personally who are involved in these lawsuits and all the rest.

Now, you know what it's like when you're fighting for your liberty, when you're fighting against the tide. This is this is when you know who. The men are versus the boys, the women are versus the girls, this is when you know who truly is a patriot. And who's just on the sidelines typing away and talking away? This is when you know who's going to stand up for the country and who is not. And now you can draw your own conclusions and you are you are you're deciding what television to watch, what radio to listen to, what websites to read, you're going on the Internet.

You're giving comments to people with whom you disagree or agree. You're activists, you're active citizens, and that's a very, very good thing and it's a very, very important thing. Now, Joe Biden was asked today. By Peter Deucy, Peter Deuces turned out to be quite a serious reporter, quite, quite a good reporter. He was trying to ask Joe Biden about his son, none of the other reporters asked a single question about Hunter Biden, none of them.

And Peter Deucy was forced to yell out his question. And of course, Joe Biden walked off the stage as quickly as he could throughout an answer, which you'll hear in a moment, because, of course, he was worried about the coronavirus. And, you know, they don't want too many actual reporters to gather in one place. So at a press conference today, so called it was Peter Doocy and tried to ask the so-called president elect about his son, Hunter.

Take a listen.

Cut three go sightings. How soon do you plan on taking the rotavirus vaccine? All right. So stop. You hear that?

REPORTER Hey, President elect Joe Biden, how soon do you expect to take the Corona's vaccine, LICITRA and ask him what flavor milkshake he likes?

There's that newsworthy to you when he plans to take the coronavirus vaccine that Donald Trump. In his administration led the effort to develop. If you're going to yell that question, at least say, hey, President elect Joe Biden, how soon do you plan to take the coronavirus vaccine that was developed under Donald Trump and warp speed?

Right. That would be an accurate sense. Even if you're going to slobber all over Biden, all right, go ahead, verify information. Brian. I he's talking here trying to break away from. I'm proud of my son as he walked off. That's it. He's proud of his son. His son, who was thrown out of the military because he was a cokehead, his son. Who impregnated a stripper then when she had his baby, denied it and didn't want to pay?

Support for the baby until a judge got involved. His son. Who is raking in millions of millions of dollars from state run corporations around the world, he's proud of them. His son, who's now under criminal investigation for potential tax and securities fraud, his son who dated his other son's wife after he passed away. Joe Biden is very proud of this son, very proud of him. Chip off the old block. I want you to remember what Joe Biden said at the presidential debate on October 22, 2020.

Seems like forever ago it was six or seven weeks ago. And I am telling you, Joe Biden knew his son was under criminal investigation by then, had to know. Why would his son keep it from his father doesn't even make any sense. Cut, go, there have been questions about the work your son has done in China and for Ukrainian energy company when you were vice president. In retrospect, was anything about those relationships inappropriate or unethical?

Nothing was unethical. Here's what to do with regard to Ukraine. We had this whole question about whether or not because he was on the board, I later learned of abridgment, a company that somehow I had done something wrong. Yet every single solitary person, when he was going through his impeachment, testifying under oath, who worked for him, said, I did that.

So he's asked. About his son and Ukraine and he turns it on Donald Trump. Which is what they always do, which is all they do. Go ahead impeccably. I carried out U.S. policy. Not one single solitary thing was out of line, not a single thing, number one. Number two, the guy who got in trouble in Ukraine was this guy trying to bribe the Ukrainian government to say something negative about, say.

He's not going to answer the question. It's all trumped Trump. What about your son? There's questions raised about your son, with China, with the Ukraine. It's this guy over here that that guy over there. This guy over there. It's always been a slug. Biden, go ahead. They would not do and did not do because it never, ever, ever happened. My son has not made money in terms of this thing about what are you talking about China?

I have not had the only guy made money from China is this guy is the only one.

I mean, disrespectful. He's a lowlife. He's a punk. Biden always has been. And still is. And so he knew his son was under investigation for illicit proceeds for which he didn't pay taxes, apparently, and questions about the securities. And he diverted the entire time he lied to you, he lied to the American people, you lied through his teeth and so did the media. So did Jake Tapper.

So today, Wolf Blitzer. So did Deliman. So did Frater Cuomo. So did Andrea Mitchell and Brian Williams. And Sacco and Vanzetti, a.k.a. the Scarborough's, they all lied through their teeth to you over and over again, they all were covering up for Biden.

They all ignored the overwhelming evidence that was presented. Shortly before the election. By The New York Post and others said they trashed Rudy Giuliani, they went around talking about this was a a Russian psy ops operation. They got 50 former national intel experts to sign a letter. This is all done by Biden, done by his campaign, all put out there in the friendly, phony media in order to create cover for Biden, a smokescreen to push him over the finish line, because you and I know damn well had any of this come out.

In a way in which the vast majority of the American people would hear about it, not just talk radio audiences, not just Fox audiences, not just The New York Post audiences. That even with all the corruption and institutionalized fraud and all the rest, Biden would have failed. But they turned it around on Trump, you see, this is a Trump dirty trick. These are the Russians and there goes Trump again with the Russians. When it's the Democrats, we're all caught up with the Chinese regime in China.

I'll be right back.

My love in. Did you know your family can save over 800 dollars a year just by switching to pure talk from Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile? Think about it. What could your family do with an extra 800 dollars? You don't even have to sacrifice coverage. Pure talk has exactly the same coverage, same bars as one of the big carriers. But they charge you half. You definitely don't have to sacrifice customer service. Their team is based right here in the U.S. and are some of the nicest people you'll ever talk to.

So don't wait anymore. Get unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. No, not even a penny. So go to Pure Talk, USA Dotcom and a promo code Lhevinne podcast that's 11 podcast. And when you do, you'll also say 50 percent off your first month. Folks, this is the best. That's pure. Talk to USA Dotcom Promo Code Lhevinne podcast Pure Talk USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

Here's how the media run their stories, Skoda's thwart Trump bid to overturn election. Now, they would never write about that with the Biden lawyers in these different states saying Biden lawyers trying to thwart the will of the people in Pennsylvania, Biden lawyers trying to thwart the will of the people in Georgia, Biden lawyers trying to thwart the will of the people in Michigan. You never hear that, do you? Don't our media suck? Aren't they the absolute worst?

Don't you despise them? They are, in fact, the enemy of the people. Donald Trump has exposed them for exactly what they are. And now they're fully out of the closet, you know, everywhere I go, people say to me, Mr. Producer, what can we do?

What can we do right now? We can't do anything. You know, we're not five years old, we've done everything we can. And we got to get ready for the next fight, the next fights in Georgia. Now, if we lose Georgia. Then we're going to lose a big chunk of this country. That's the facts. So what would you do? Well, you go online, you see how to support the candidates in Georgia. If you live in Georgia or near Georgia, you try and figure out how to volunteer the elections January 5th.

It's very, very important that election is not just a Georgia election. That's a national election. So the things you can do. There are things you can do, but I do not. Disagree with your frustration, I understand it, I share it. Trust me. But we can't be Pollyannas here, we can see the rising tide. Of totalitarianism, we can see the rising tide of tyranny and we can see how our institutions are buckling. Our institutions are literally buckling.

This is 100 years, really 120 years of neo Marxist progressivism that has always, if you read rediscovering Americanism in the tyranny of progressivism, you'll know exactly what I'm talking about.

This has always been their aim.

And they are advancing. And we are fighting them. One state at a time, one institution at a time. I'll be right back. Mark Levin, tough as hell. That's why I like Mark Levin and I'm not sure a lot of people like him. He's tough as hell, but I like him. I love a call in No. Eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. These companies fires and Moderna.

They were given billions of dollars under operation warp speed. What's enabled them to be capitalized for research and development? To create these vaccines that are going to save millions and millions of lives in this country all over and all over the world, the Democrats didn't do it. Trump still fighting with the Food and Drug Administration, the UK and Canada, which have excellent scientists.

They're taking our vaccine developed by our companies and giving it to their people while we're waiting. And this is why the president of the United States is furious. Meanwhile, both of these companies, their corporate management and boards, made the decision. Tonight even announced the existence of these vaccines until after the election and the case of Pfizer. They waited five days. And then they announced that they had a vaccine. Maduro announced shortly thereafter. So they withheld that information purposely.

The information about the Biden crime family. The head mobster being Joe Biden himself was covered up. Withheld from the vast majority of the American people. He was under grand jury criminal investigation for tax fraud and securities fraud. For two years and it didn't leak. I don't blame Dabar Bill Barr could go to prison if he put this information out. He's not free to release investigative information of that kind, whether you like it or not, whether you like it or not.

But it's amazing. It didn't leak, isn't it, ladies and gentlemen? And I don't mean from Barr, but I mean from the hundred other people who knew about it. You can damn be sure if it involved a Trump, it would been leaked and on the front page of The New York Times with Donald Trump's taxes. So the media intentionally censor information when their job is to present the people with news so people can draw their own conclusions. So the vaccine.

Which was ready to go with these private companies to the FDA was a big secret until after the election. The grand jury criminal investigation of Hunter Biden. Which I think leads to Joe Biden, it's just a matter of time, and I'm going to discuss this at length with Peter Schweizer on Sunday, I hope you won't miss it on Life, Liberty and Levin. That was covered up and hidden. And so after the election, meanwhile, the Democrats had decided that they're not going to allow Donald Trump to win.

So first they impeach him, they criminally investigate him, they spy on him. They use the instrumentalities of federal law enforcement and federal intelligence to try and take him out. They fail. The media viciously attack him day in and day out, even at presidential press conferences. They lie about him. They lie about his family. But they knew that wasn't enough. So they go into these states, the Biden campaign organizes this. To change the rules, 2016, you had a very smooth election.

We knew the president was at two 30 in the morning. Look at this damn mess that took place here. And these justices. Who sit there in those damn black robes and act like. With their sanctimony that they're above it all. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. And now we know, we already knew, but now we know of, as a matter of fact. That Joe Biden is corrupt up to his eyeballs with China, his entire damn family is.

And what are the media doing, ABC, NBC and CBS, they're trying to cover it up, MRC News Busters points out there have only covered the story for really 30, 40 seconds. 30, 40 seconds. Here's the president of the United States now, he says we've developed a vaccine. The British are using it. The Canadians are using it. Let's go FDA, what the hell you're Snowies can be and they are. This is why, ladies and gentlemen, this operation, warp speed is so incredible.

Trump had to fight the inertia at the bureaucracy, the FDA, the falsies, the purchase, the NIH here to fight them, not because it's against science, but because he's for science. He wants to save lives while he's being accused of killing people. And even now he's pushing them, where the hell is the vaccine, get the vaccine out. This is why you're furious. Even more now we know that Donald Trump, as a result of what took place here with Operation Warp Speed, they have now revolutionized the development of vaccines from this day forward because of operation warp speed and what the president and the vice president of the United States did trumpet parts.

Revolutionized it. It's incredible, LeBron James, this is from Breitbart, Dotcom is named Time Athlete of the Year for voter suppression work.

L.A. Lakers star LeBron James has been named Time magazine. There is no more Time magazine. There's no more Time magazine. Go out and try and buy one. This whole thing is bizarre. Time magazine's Athlete of the Year for his work to stop voter suppression. Voter suppression, we don't have voter suppression. James is more he's he's a Democrat hack, that's all he is. James is more than a vote organization was formed right after the death of George Floyd to root out purported voter suppression.

The NBA star also claimed he created the organization to educate voters and to help increase the turnout for the 2020 elections. To turn out for whom?

James was also awarded the Sports Illustrated Sports People of the Year with the award honoring athletes who excel on and off the field. This is a disgusting disgrace. He's a mouthpiece. For communist China, he certainly was. He defended Nike, which pays him a fortune for sneakers. LeBron James, I want you to listen. I want you to listen very carefully. Do you hear that, LeBron? Do you hear that? Do you hear that, LeBron, you know what that is?

That's two million wiggers. They're pleading for their lives. That's two million wiggers, Muslims. Her pleading to be set free from the slavery, the communist regime. That's two million wiggers pleading for their family members from what from whom they've been torn, wives being raped and sterilized, forced abortions. Child labor. Torture, mass graves. Do you hear them, LeBron, do you hear them crying, they hear them screaming out in any of your mansions and California?

Whenever you're a quarter of a million dollar cars with your sneakers and so forth, do you hear them crying and screaming, LeBron? They are and you don't hear them. Because you're getting awards. Her being a heartless S.O.P. From Time magazine and Sports Illustrated. Well, good for you. Put that up on your mantle with your other awards. And just keep in mind. Who you're standing with. Then your blood money. I'll be right back.

Much love in. Did you know your family can save over 800 dollars a year just by switching to pure talk from Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile? Think about it. What could your family do with an extra 800 dollars? You don't even have to sacrifice coverage. Pure talk has exactly the same coverage, same bars as one of the big carriers. But they charge you half. You definitely don't have to sacrifice customer service. Their team is based right here in the U.S. and are some of the nicest people you'll ever talk to.

So don't wait anymore. Get unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. No, not even a penny. So go to talk. USA Dotcom and a promo code Lhevinne podcast. That's 11 podcast. And when you do, you'll also say 50 percent off your first month. Folks, this is the best. That's pure. Talk to USA Dotcom Promo Code Lhevinne podcast, Pure Talk USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

You know, Glenn Reynolds, who runs a wonderful website, Instapundit, and is a terrific guy, he's a professor also of law, and he looks quickly at this Supreme Court decision, seven to two in the lack of standing, they say, when it comes to Texas and the other states. And he says, you know, the statement that Texas lacked standing would seem to implicitly overrule Massachusetts versus EPA, and that's when Massachusetts sued the EPA and other states did for not.

Imposing stricter environmental regulations, including on neighboring states, because, you know, air doesn't.

Doesn't respond well to state lines. Pollution across the state lines, that was part of their argument, and so we need to control carbon dioxide, which of course wasn't a pollutant, but it was a big decision, five to four. And yet they found that Massachusetts had standing to sue to compel the EPA to apply regulations against the other states. And Professor Reynolds is saying here, so the expanded standing for the states. In the climate change context. But in this case, there's no standing.

You understand his point, Mr. Producer. Well, Glenn Reynolds is tops, he's he's top shelf intellect. That's a very fascinating point.

But it's a disgrace on the Supreme Court and there you have three justices who President Trump appointed, who voted with Roberts and the leftists on the court, you have Clarence Thomas, who was appointed by George H.W. Bush, and you have Sam Alito, who was appointed by George Bush.

Both of whom were exactly correct. In this case, of course, they're standing. It's not a standing issue, it's a conflict between and among the states. We have original jurisdiction. We can't say there's no standing and apply standing standards. It's so straightforward, it's just it's clear that. That most of these justices just don't have the guts. To do what needs to be done. That's the way I see it. Am I all caught up, Mr.

Producer? No. One of my favorites, so I would ask all the legal analysts with emphasis on analysts, how do you square the Massachusetts versus EPA case in the standing issue there? With what the Supreme Court just did to the state of Texas and 17 or 18 other states, how do you square that? Well, I'll tell you how you square it by turning it into. And nothing the court wanted to rule a certain way in one case and the court wanted to rule another way in the other case.

It's that simple. It's no more complicated than that. A federal judge hears case challenging voter purges, Obama appointee, they want him to put 200000 people dead or lie back on the voter lists, even though the state followed the federal procedures because they want to stuff the ballot boxes. And if they get an opinion that supports it, then they're off to the races again. That's how it works. I want to remind all of you folks, thanks to our friends at the post-millennial website.

This is a great site, isn't it, Mr. Reduce? It's a new site, as I can tell the post-millennial dotcom mccastle flashback. Obama attained power by questioning ballots and signatures. Wait a minute. Former President Obama won his first election by throwing all of his opponents off the ballot based on technicalities in his first race for office seeking an Illinois state Senate seat in 1996, Obama used the election rules to eliminate his Democratic competition. Obama employed Chicago's rules to invalidate voting petition signatures, he ultimately disqualified all four Democratic primary rivals and three minor candidates.

The action denied each of them have place on the ballot. His move cleared the way for Obama to run unopposed on the Democratic ticket in a heavily Democratic district. Yes, President Trump's mild mannered, lionised predecessor played hardball. The darling of the modern Democrat Party first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing his path to victory. The Obama campaign reportedly called CNN's 2008 coverage a hit job, insisting that the publication talks to a state representative who supports Obama.

According to an Obama spokesman at the time, the individual would be objective. But when reporters called this person, she said she could not recall details of the petition challenges who engineered them for the Obama campaign and why all the candidates were challenged. CNN alledged. Records of the challenges are no longer on file, you mean Obama was a sleazeball? I can't believe that. How can you say that about how he used Chicago tactics to clear the field? And now he accused Donald Trump of undermining democracy because he's actually bringing legal claims in front of real courts.

I'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by Aimé, the Association of Mature American Citizens, now over two million conservative members, Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Amax U.S. Join us here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number 877 three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. I went back during the break because I remember this Massachusetts versus EPA decision.

John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority was five to four how outrageous this decision was. Because the majority in the court wanted to get to a specific result. And the result was to compel the Environmental Protection Agency. To regulate. Back then, it was called global warming, and that even though carbon dioxide scientifically, scientifically is not a pollutant, there has been. Massachusetts, among other states, was arguing that it contributed to global warming and therefore the EPA.

Could not simply. Pass on it, being active about it. But that at fault, it fell under the statutory language. Of the Clean Air Act, which it clearly did not. Furthermore. The D.C. Circuit Court in Washington, D.C., often called the second most powerful court, had thrown the case out for among other reasons, saying that Massachusetts didn't have standing. So you're the smartest audience in America, so that's why I treat you with respect.

Well, they didn't have standing. Well, why why didn't they have standing? Ordered the D.C. Circuit Court say. You don't have the authority. You don't have the standing to bring a case against the Environmental Protection Agency, the force, this federal agency. To regulate really a non pollutant and to do so on behalf of other states as an example, because you're the consequence of your decision will affect other states, but you don't have any standing.

In other words, you're not specifically harmed. So in that case, the court concocted. Standing, it said the stake in protecting its quasi sovereign interests were at stake, so. For the state commonwealth of Massachusetts, the court held that it had a stake in protecting its quasi sovereign interests as a state. Didn't Texas and the other states have a quasi sovereign interest as a state and protecting their interests, their interests being? An honest count. The Electoral College and the choosing of a president, vice president of the United States.

The answer is yes. If Massachusetts versus EPA stands. The Texas and the other states had standing. But this is how it works. The activists on the court can take a word like standing and and turn it into 15 different meanings in order to accommodate their ends that they can call carbon monoxide, even though it's not a pollutant, a pollutant like substance that can be regulated, even though it can't be regulated under federal law.

So there's a twofer to strikes, but the court stepped in and saved it. Now, this court. Determined that. The same states, that is states of the United States did not have standing. And by the way, before I salute Sam Alito too much. His was, again, a rather terse comment that. And I want to get this right here, let's see, give me a second. He says basically, he says he would not grant other relief and I express no other view.

So it grant them standing, but he'd slap them down. So al-Qaeda is form over substance. As best I can tell, again, it's a rather terse statement that the court issued. As best I can tell, it will be Thomas and Thomas alone. At least had an open mind. And that's your Supreme Court. Thomas and Thomas alone, as far as I can tell. But I could be wrong about that statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, in my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction.

I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint, but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issues. Well, I guess then that. Thomas did join Alito in that respect. So there you have it. So I assume when there's another case in line with Massachusetts versus EPA, this court will reverse course and say, wait a minute, there wasn't standing none of this quasi sovereignty interest crap.

I think Glenn Reynolds for pointing this out, you will not see this. On any other blog or legal analyst, you certainly won't see it on TV by any professor or former federal prosecutor. This is way above their their grade level.

Way above their grade level, and we've talked a lot about this guy, Warnock, who is a Marxist. I don't know if you saw the video of him having literally having Fidel Castro. You know, in his church where there's a standing ovation, his his, his. His embrace of Marxism is is not in doubt. But there's this Georgia Democrat, John Asaph. And this is in me see here, let me take this one first, what did I do with it?

All right. There is a good piece in the Washington Free Beacon.

Here it is. Assad's father met with Chinese dignitaries while touring his China built yacht, Washington Free Beacon reports Assad's father is worth a fortune. He has funded his son's campaigns in the past. He lost the campaign for the House two years ago, is running for the Senate again, but is extraordinarily wealthy. Father. Has ties again. To the communist Chinese regime, don't most Democrats, don't most Democrats supporters, Georgia Democratic candidate John Ashcroft's millionaire father met with Chinese so-called dignitaries while touring a 60 foot yacht he purchased from a China based shipbuilder tied to Communist Party officials.

Richard Asaph, who has bankrolled his son's upstart political career commission, China based jet turned Marine, to build the custom vessel in 2008, that nice flowing communist Chinese money for communist China ties with the communist.

Chinese party. Before shipping the yacht to the United States, the company held a sea trial for customers Heather and Richard Asaph of Atlanta, Georgia, in order to test the million dollar vessel's performance with, quote, many Chinese dignitaries in attendance. The Saleen 1019 sea trial was attended by the customers, many dignitaries from Ping Shop and Juha. The press, the deputy governor, the bureau chief and the editor of China Boating Magazine has since deleted press release, stated, oh, they deleted it.

I wonder why you don't had to delete it. The press isn't going to cover it. As many times as many as 40 to 50 people were aboard, but the large yacht never felt crowded, they said, and the yacht boasted a state of the art steering system and extensively modified inside, featuring quite open and bright galley and salon area. Elazar, it laid out perfectly for Cuba equipment, a scuba equipment utility room with a spacious work area and so forth and so on.

And it only cost one point three million.

Now this marks yet another tie between the Assad family and a Chinese company linked to communist leaders. John Alsop's foreign film company, Insight T.Y., has received at least 5000 dollars from a communist backed media giant PCCW in the last two years. Asaph failed to disclose the payment in a May financial report before quietly revealing it.

In an amended filing issued nearly two months later, his campaign went on to Blamey Power, where a paperwork oversight for the discrepancy.

Imagine that he and Hunter with the paperwork.

Oversight's Asaph has benefited from his father's deep pockets throughout his political rise. Democrat has taken more than 17000 campaign contributions from his father since twenty seventeen, he became CEO of INSIGHT after using a large family inheritance to buy a controlling stake in the company as his father also footing the bill for his son's Washington, D.C., residents, while Asaph worked as a legislative assistant under Representative Hank Johnson. Oh, this guy's precious house suffuse the job to claim he'd spent five years working as a national security aide with top secret clearance.

But he later admitted that he had clearance for just five months. God, what a sleazeball. Founded in 1998 by Taiwanese businessman Howard Chen, Jetton operates production facilities in Zoop and got China. Chen has touted the support of high ranking Chinese Communist Party officials, including former vice premier Wang Yang, in the past. Vice Premier Wang Yang once came to inspect Jet Turn, he gave me his thumbs up, praising me for winning glory. Chen wrote in 2015.

Later, when I started to integrate the industrial chain and capitalize, another leader said, I saved at least 10 years.

I have no idea what any of that means. Part of the vessel's completion, Richard Asaph submitted a customer testimonial, noting his outstanding experience with Japan.

So here we have a guy who wants to be a senator from Georgia whose family is all sleazoid up with the communist regime in China. Just what you need, Georgia. I've got Georgia on my mind, don't you, Mr. Bettison?

I'll be right back. Much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them, a man who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.

Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at us. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead a c us.

Way back in October, NBC News had a long piece, I printed it out, it's many, many pages, a long piece entitled How a Fake Persona Laid the Groundwork for 100 Biden Conspiracy Deluge.

The whole story was fake, a fake intelligence document, they say, went viral on the right wing Internet, asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden's son and business in China. That document, a 64 page composition that was later disseminated by close associates of President Trump, appears to be the work of a fake intelligence firm called Typhoon Investigations, according to research.

It goes on and on and on to cover up for the Bidens.

This was NBC News in October and NBC News right now.

Emailed to Biden raises fresh questions about his tax dealings. So this phony news organization now wants you to believe it's a news organization when in fact, when it mattered, it covered up everything and attacked the people who were digging up the information on the Biden crime family.

An email obtained by NBC News indicates the president elect's son was told he did not disclose 400000 in income from the Berrisford gas company on his 2014 tax returns. Wow. So he did get income from Prisma and it was hundreds and hundreds of thousands and he didn't report it on his tax returns. Now, that four hundred thousand dollar number is interesting because Joe Biden wants to crush anybody who earned honestly, legally with hard work. Four hundred thousand dollars, but here is Punke son, he gets four hundred thousand dollars and he doesn't want to pay taxes on it.

By Tom Winter, Biden's former business partner, sent him an email in 2017. Saying he did not disclose on his tax returns 400000 in income from the Ukrainian natural gas company where he sat on the board, according to a copy of an email obtained by NBC News, every newsroom in America should be ashamed of itself. Every newsroom in America is a disgrace, except a handful of conservatives who tried to make it clear to the American people was taking place every damn one of them.

In 2014, you joined the tourism board and we still need to amend your 2014 tax returns to reflect the unreported income, says the email dated January 16, 2017. The email goes on to note that Hunter Biden, who's now the subject of a federal tax probe and also. A an FCC criminal investigation netted more than one point two dollars million for the year, the earnings included the 400000 from Verizon, as well as income from Rosemont, Seneca advisers and a legal firm.

Wow. NBC went to attacking people who are trying to bring this and more to the public for. The email was made available by Rudy Giuliani's attorney, Robert Costello, Costello has said he was given a copy of one hundred Biden's hard drives from the owner of a computer repair shop in Delaware. Oh, you don't say we know that two months ago, you Jex. Now, listen to what they say, NBC News did not have access to the full drive.

It's not known what, if any, action Hunter Biden took in response to the e-mail. Oh, they didn't have access to the full drive. Why had access? Not part of it. Federal prosecutors in Delaware scrutinizing Biden's business dealings in China as part of a tax probe that began in twenty, eighteen, two damn years ago. There's no indication at his work for the Brisbane National Gas Company as part of the investigation, but the email obtained by NBC News releases fresh questions about Hunter Biden's tax affairs.

His lawyer did not return a request for comment. A spokesperson for the Biden transition team declined to comment when sent a list of questions, including whether heightened by Hunter, Biden amended his 2014 tax returns. Wow. I wonder if the attorney general of Delaware will want the tax returns released. Wow. I wonder if the Democrats who run these committees in the House and Nancy Pelosi are going to want his tax returns released. Wow. What do you think?

I wonder if somebody at the IRS will leak them to The New York Times. In a statement released Wednesday, Hunter Biden acknowledged the investigation, I blah, blah, blah.

So Hunter Biden is a serial liar to us, his father's a serial liars, always been a serial liar and in addition to a plagiarizer and he is a molester and he got away with all of this stuff thanks to NBC News.

Thanks to The Today Show, thanks to Good Morning America, thanks to ABC News. Thanks to CBS News and whatever, they have their morning shows gone. Thanks to the Idiots and NSW and the idiots at the Constipated News Network, they're still obsessed with Trump. Now, what are they going to do it? Well, let's see if they tank Joe Biden for Kamala Harris. Oh, yes. One never knows, does one? As members of my family like to say.

Now NBC News is reporting news, how did this happen? Yeah, the plan was always to use Biden as a stalking horse and then and then move him out of the way. That's my belief. Biden is the Manchurian Candidate. That's what he is, the whole family. I want to thank the United States Supreme Court, as I say, you may have cut your own throats depending on what happens in Georgia, but, hey, that's too bad.

There's nothing we can do about it. We the people at this point, Biden, who's crooked, the whole family's crooked.

The media knew they were crooked. The media covered up for them. Why? Because the media crooked. That's why the media cover up for each other. I'll be right back. AMEC, the Association of Major American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington.

AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's.

That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

Mark Levin, George Patton, well, talk radio conglomerate seven seven three eight one three eight one one, that's eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

You're going to see a lot of shows about the Bidens and Hunter Biden and so forth all weekend long, no doubt on all kinds of platforms out there.

Just make sure you save time for my Sunday show at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. You won't be disappointed.

You never are. I have the best guests I can bring in who who I let talk, we talk at length. That's a completely different format than anywhere else in television, period.

Can I ask questions? I hope they're good questions and I wait for good answers.

Peter Schweizer is going to be on the program. He's the number one Biden expert in Washington, corruption expert on the entire planet. And he and I are going to go through this very, very carefully and in detail fashion, and he was the first sign of this, the whole Biden crime family. He deserves all the credit in the world. Rudy Giuliani deserves all the credit in the world.

Rudy has been heroic in what he has done. So he deserves a great deal of support, but look how they tried to destroy him. Look at the trend destroying anybody who's in the way. Look at them going after Rush Limbaugh now, my brother. Rush Limbaugh never pushed for secession. He said their movements out there, this could be encouraging it, but he never endorsed it. It's like me talking about the Electoral College. All of a sudden, there's all these articles out that Mr.

Miller, did I say that now? You never said, well, how did this happen?

Because they try and take us down. They can't confront us on ideas. They can't confront us on facts. They try and destroy us. And of course, the man they've tried to destroy the most is Rush Limbaugh.

He's always been at the point of the spear. Always been at the point of these are heartless, heartless and and and crackpots.

Who are just out to destroy. That's why they defend riders, they defend all the corruption in these states leading up to the vote, they defend it all. They defend it all. Let's take some calls, shall we? Yes, we can. Let us go to Tim Charlotte, North Carolina, on the White House, Tim, listening to us. Guys, I have no idea.

XM Satellite. Go right ahead. Tim Remarque, how are you doing? Thanks for taking my call. You got it. Hey, so I wanted to run an idea by you. So the lack of standing for states due to the no judicially cognizable interest, that means that the state and other states have no interest in the matter of conducting elections. OK, if another state. Right. That's an answer to a narrow question. But what about this idea?

Other states don't, but the state legislature right of its own does. Now, because of this precedent, there is no state on state interference as a defense or an immediate filing to the SCOTUS.

So why not what in your plenary power to defer to the deadline and use latches to prevent them from, you know, you getting it?

Why would the state legislature would use Lachs? Against who? No, I'm saying the state legislatures can resume their plenary power and then if there is any appeal to state legislatures don't have to go to the courts at all, they can exercise the power to appoint electors in lieu.

Of the electors that were, quote unquote, elected through these bastardised systems, now one of the positions I've taken since early on that has been intentionally misinterpreted by the left, including Professor Lessig of Harvard Law School, is that the state legislatures should pick electors based on what the outcome would have been to the best they can. They can discern it. Under the law that existed, that they passed, not as the law was changed, and if that means a whole bunch of ballots are thrown out, so be it, because those ballots would not have been counted as an example, Pennsylvania, none of those ballots would have counted a couple of months ago.

So if your question is, can the state legislature exercise its power? And my argument was it should exercise its power respecting the law that existed in the law that was violated and take it into their own hands.

Yes, it can. OK, you. Can I can I respond to that to clarify? Go ahead. But you got to be quick. They do decide to do that. Thank you. If they do decide to do that and then another state tries to intervene. This is no precedent. No. So they can't.

But there would be no reason for another state to intervene because they're the state legislature acting within the four corners of article to what Texas is arguing is, look, take Pennsylvania, for example.

Pennsylvania violated its own constitution. Pennsylvania violated the federal constitution. Every branch of Pennsylvania, whether the legislature in the original act, the secretary of state and the governor on the executive level, the state Supreme Court clearly violated and Texas is saying Supreme Court, fix this. If a state legislature on its own wants to fix it, there's nothing to stop it. Thank you for your call, my friend, was that clear enough, Mr. Producer? I think I've got it, I think I think I answered Tim as best I could.

Let's go to David Charleston, South Carolina, on the Mark Levin. How are you, David? Hello, sir, thank you.

You just answered my first question, I was going to ask if there was if you ever saw a legal means for state legislators to while there's a constitutional means, it's that same article, Article two, Section one, clause two, if you pull it up under Duck, Duck or Bing or Google, if you must and you read it, the state legislatures choose the method by which the electors are to be chosen.

Period. And I'm looking at the membership of the of the legislatures of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Yeah, there are people there. There are Republican. Yes. All right. I want to make a second point is probably more important, if you would like me. Well, I hope I hope state legislators in those states are listening and trying to drum up support for such an action. But my main point was to challenge Americans across the way.

Good luck with that. But anyway, go ahead. Yes, I can only ask that that I think in order to counter attempt to counter the power of the press is for Americans across the country to try to organize, debate well, organize debates on select topics for the public to attend.

I don't know who's going to do that and who's going to cover that. But I will say this.

We know who the enemy the people are and we know the companies that own them. You know, AT&T owns CNN. You know, Comcast owns NBC and MSNBC. You know, Amazon owns The Washington Post and so forth. If you're serious about these things, stop using their services and stop buying their products. Well, I'm trying, my friend, thank you for your call. Let's continue, shall we? Let's go to Joe Tulsa, Oklahoma, on the Mark Levin, you know what I'm noticing, Mr.

Producer? Most of the people are calling, but based on listening to the Arab satellite radio, that sort of thing. Go ahead.

Yes, yes. Yes, ma'am. Yeah. The only way that I see that we're going to change the way America is working right now is if we change the First Amendment now, we have freedom of the press for free to do whatever they want to do. I don't believe that they should be free to do whatever.

Well, listen, this cuts both ways. I don't have any problem with the First Amendment, but I have a problem with and Clarence Thomas has raised this actually is in The New York Times versus Sullivan case way back in the 60s.

The Supreme Court basically gave blanket immunity to these newspapers when it comes to public officials.

And the Supreme Court has actually watered down with a public official is giving a broader and broader and broader definition to it.

In the early days of this country, even when we had a constitution and even when we later had a bill of rights, the state laws.

For smearing and disparaging individuals and companies and so forth, we're still in place, they were utterly unaffected.

So you could bring a libel case against a newspaper and so forth, and that's the problem, the Supreme Court decided to change the First Amendment, freedom of the press doesn't mean that you're given special privileges outside the courtroom.

Freedom of the press means that you're free to speak now. There will be consequences, but not anymore. And I think that's what you're getting at.

And so we should go to pre New York Times versus Sullivan. It seemed to work for the country very, very well for most of our history.

And I don't believe it was a good decision, just as I don't believe big tech should be protected. You can see your point as you can see how they exercised their power. They exercise it for tyranny. They exercise it in it in a totalitarian way. They exercise it in a way where they try and destroy one president and create another president. Well, we can't have that in this country. So how do we fix it? We change that decision.

The problem is, no matter how many so-called constitutionalists we put on the Supreme Court, they disappoint us over and over and over again. So we're in a bit of a problem here. Thank you for your call, my friend. We'll be right back.

Mark Globin. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. EMAC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more.

And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a C dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join AMOC instead a a C U.S..

See, ladies and gentlemen, if the defamation laws. We're still in place in a in a way in which they can actually be used against media outlets that have to be a lot careful, 90 percent of the people who currently dress up as journalists. And call people Hitler or deranged or whatever, they would be removed from these networks, they would be forced to police themselves in a serious way. They'd be forced to actually try and report news rather than smear and character assassination.

There'd be no room for the likes of Jake Tapper, Wolf Blitzer. Deliman, Frater, Cuomo, there'll be no room for any of them, Ms.

LSD in the Constipated Network would have to utterly change what it is that they do.

Jeff Zucker would be living in a tent as a homeless guy.

Ladies and gentlemen, every Friday, in honor of you live knights and patriots, we play America. Here we go. CNN. All right, the week is officially over, the weekend begins right now. Don't forget Sunday Life Liberty. And in 8:00 p.m. Eastern, there's only two new life. Liberty and Lovins left this year.

And this is a blockbuster, crucially important. We salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters and emergency personnel. Goodnights Brighty, Gary Griffey Jr. and I, Pepsi, Smokey, can I Zalba, can Iggy and can get my little Barney. I will see you on Sunday.

Right. And then on Monday. Goodnight, Dad, Mom and Leo. And God bless. From the Westwood One podcast network.