Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.

Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike Love, and. Hey, the stock Washburne filling in for Mark Levin, I do the afternoon talk show, Mark's affiliate in Little Rock, Arkansas, Newsradio 189 KTAR and always a delight and a pleasure and an honor to fill in for the great one number to call to get in the conversations eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

And you're going to want to get in on the conversation tonight. This is my ninth time filling in for Mr. Levin. I think this is the first time that I've done this. But I've got to start our one with an incredible article that dropped today over at Uncovered D.C. Dotcom from one of my favorite columnists, a guy named Brian Cates out of South Texas.

And the article's entitled There Is No Election Month in the Constitution. And here's what he says. For the past five weeks, citizens of the United States have been getting a civics lesson on how federal elections are supposed to be held. Deviation from what the Constitution clearly establishes has reached a tipping point because of the way certain states handled the election. The way that Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. Michigan, Arizona and Nevada carried out the November election, has now brought them into blatant and clear conflict with the Constitution itself.

The Constitution says there is a designated election day with very real deadlines for voting. There's no reference in the Constitution to election week or election month or even an election quarter year. Votes are to be cast within a single day and the votes are to be counted at the end of the deadline period. Various states have over the years deliberately undermined the constitutional limit by passing state laws that essentially have drawn out elections for federal offices. So they last for a week or more.

In twenty eighteen. Democrats in California used state laws about ballot harvesting to flip several House of representative races after the official Election Day. In one blatant instance, Republican candidate young Kim saw a 14 point lead on Election Day somehow disappear.

He says, as I write this. Election Day was over a month ago, and yet states such as New York are still finding and counting votes. This is not how federal elections are supposed to be conducted. Constantly shifting election deadlines invites fraud and errors, especially in the close contests. Democrats and many of these blue states have been incrementally gaining the federal election process for years, pushing the deadlines back further and further after Election Day to give them time to find enough votes to flip close races.

Now, the president warned of massive fraud on the horizon. President Trump was sounding the alarm early and often this year about how governors. Secretaries of state. And state supreme courts were deliberately going around their states legislatures to rewrite. Or to even read or to even introduce new election laws. When Attorney General William Barr warned in June about the mail in fraud issues when multiple states suddenly changed their election rules, President Trump tweeted Barr's concerns. He linked to an article from Breitbart that said, ba mail in ballots absolutely opens.

The floodgates to fraud. And the president said this will be the election disaster of our time, mail in ballots will lead to a rigged election. The same day, June 22nd, this year, the president also tweeted, rigged 20-20 election, millions of mail in ballots will be printed by foreign countries and others.

It will be the scandal of our times. Now, one of the chief arguments made against the mass mail in ballot schemes being prepared by blue states was that it was obvious they were fully planning to take weeks to count all of the votes. While the governors and state supreme courts were busy quickly rewriting election laws and cutting the state legislatures out of the process, the Constitution is clear. It is those state legislatures that pass election laws and set election deadlines. Governors such as Brian Kemp and Georgia.

And secretaries of state, including Kathy Boockvar and Pennsylvania plus state supreme courts such as the one in Nevada, pointed to the hysteria ginned up over covid-19 to justify their actions. It was stated at the time these arbitrary changes were being implemented, that this extra legal activity was unconstitutional on its face and now it appears the Supreme Court is going to take up the matter thanks to a new Texas lawsuit. On Tuesday morning, news broke of a lawsuit filed just before midnight by the state of Texas.

Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by arguing that the methods employed by these four states for altering federal election procedures are in direct conflict with the Constitution itself. Texas has managed to bypass all the other courts and take this straight to the Supreme Court later in the day, the Supreme Court indeed added the Texas lawsuit to their official docket. And the Supreme Court has now given the four states being sued, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin until Thursday, December 10th, by three p.m. Eastern.

That is tomorrow. To file their responses to the Texas lawsuit. Reporter Kyle Becker highlighted the crucial issue in a tweet about the Texas lawsuit. When he said linking to Chris Kovács article over Breitbart, Kyle Becker said. Supreme Court quote. The Texas lawsuit presents a pure question of law. It is not dependent upon disputed facts. The state of Texas doesn't need to prove a single case of fraud to win. It is enough. That the four states violated the Constitution.

Now, the article the Kyle Baker referenced by Breitbart says Texas brought the suit because the four states violated the Constitution and that the violation stands alone and apart from the resulting fraud. Using covid-19 as an excuse for quickly altering their state's election laws and procedures just ahead of the vote will very likely fail to impress the United States Supreme Court. This is because. There is no pandemic exception to clearly enumerated constitutional rights. And the right of all U.S. citizens to fair and timely elections is certainly enumerated in our nation's founding document.

Now let's look at what the Constitution makes clear. Article two of the United States Constitution begins by stating, and I quote. The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years and together with the vice president, chosen for the same term, be elected as follows.

Each state shall appoint in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct a number of electors equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the Congress, the electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for two persons of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted for and of the number of votes for each which list they shall sign and certify and transmit seal to the seat of the government of the United States directed to the President of the Senate.

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the president if such a number be a majority of a whole number of electors appointed, unquote.

Now, no, carefully. What the Constitution does not say. The document does not say. As the governor thereof may direct, it does not say as a secretary of state thereof may direct. It also does not say, as the state Supreme Court thereof may direct. The document says, as the legislature thereof may direct. Now, the counter argument being advanced is that because some states have been running federal elections, however they see fit for many years, even though their methods of conducting these federal elections directly contradict the Constitution.

The Supreme Court reasserting that they must follow the federal government's founding documents or have their federal elections voided is too extreme a remedy. The fact that the constitutional framework for federal elections was not enforced in previous years does not mean the current appeals to the Supreme Court to address these glaring constitutional issues raised by the 2020 elections are invalid. Far from it, claiming the state, which is violating the constitutional framework for federal elections, must be allowed to continue these violations because no one had ever bothered to make a legal challenge.

Is an incredibly weak argument. And yet. We are highly likely to see this argument advanced to the Supreme Court in the next few weeks by people determined to certify a fraudulent election and make Joe Biden the United States president. That is a remarkable article, I've put it on my Facebook, I put it on my Twitter, you can find it. It uncovered eCom. It's called There is no election month in the Constitution, it's by one of my favorite columnists, Brian Kates.

Coming up, I want to deal with. Some of the reasons I think this floor of this pardon me, I think this Texas lawsuit. Is such a slam dunk. And it's it's brilliant. And I'm kind of excited about it, so that's coming up once again to get the conversation. We will get to some callers eventually. Eight, seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

My name is Doc Washburn. I'm from Little Rock, Arkansas, filling in for the great one on the Mark Levin Show.

My Love In. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings. While Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over one hundred and seventy five years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government. And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs. Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or attended one of Hillsdale free regional events.

Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference. At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide. So during this season of Blessings Hillsdale, thank you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country to learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.

That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Live in for Hillsdale Dotcom.

Kind of reminds you of the Charlie Brown Peanuts Christmas special. It's nice, man, very nice stuff. Oh, because that's where it's fun. Very good.

All right, Doc Washburne from Little Rock, filling in for the great one, Mark Levin, let me give you a little context for the search for this Texas case and hat tip to Ivan Patricof over at the Epic Times Dotcom. The following eight paragraphs of legal background in the Texas Supreme Court election case are a fascinating historical context worth sharing in a mini thread he set out there on the Twitter. So here's here's what it is. Here's a quote, The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the president of the United States unless and until.

The state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College, unquote. State legislatures have plenary power to set the process for appointing presidential electors. Again, a quote from Article two, Section one, Clause two of the United States Constitution, each state shall appoint in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct a number of electors, unquote.

Then a quote from McPherson versus Blacher. 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case at the time of the founding, most states did not appoint electors through popular statewide elections. In the first presidential election, six of the 10 states that appointed electors did so by direct legislative appointment. In the third presidential election, nine of 16 states that appointed electors did so by direct legislative appointment, this practice persisted in lesser degrees through the election of 1860. Given the state legislature's constitutional primacy in selecting presidential electors, the ability to set rules governing the casting of ballots and counting of votes can not be usurped by other branches of state government.

The framers of the Constitution decided to select the president through the Electoral College. From the Federalist, now number 68, to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder and to place every practicable obstacle to cabal, intrigue and corruption, including foreign powers that might try to insinuate themselves into our elections. All right, now, all of those are direct quotes, direct quotes from the lawsuit, the plaintiff is establishing this foundation. Because one of the remedies sought would remand the selection of electors in case they are already certified back to state legislatures again.

Again. That is the Constitution. That is a constitutional. I'm sure Mark has talked about this before. But why do you think Hillary said a couple of months before the election that. Joe Biden should not concede at any point for any reason. That this thing drags out long enough, he's going to be declared the victor. Why do you think that is? For that matter, why do you think, Chris Wallace, in a September 29th election, as both candidates, will you promise right now not to declare victory until all the votes are independently certified?

Have you ever thought about that? The only time in over 100 years we haven't known the victor within 24 hours was in 2000 when Al Gore tried to steal it. Where did that come from? Let me talk about that coming up after the break. I'm Doc Washburn, filling in for the great one, Mark Levin. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings. While Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over one hundred and seventy five years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government.

And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs. Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events. Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference.

At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide. So during this season of Blessings, Hillsdale thanks you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country. To learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. Don't ask him for a middle ground, there is no middle ground.

Talk with Mark Levin now at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

All right. Doc Washburn filling in for the great one. Mark Levin, always, always good to be back in the ER chair on the Mark Levin Show. Almost 400 radio stations from coast to coast. So I had alluded to before we get to your calls at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one I had alluded to and this didn't occur to me, I didn't catch it until after the election. I went back and watched it. Why was Chris Wallace?

Saying to both Trump and Biden. Will you both promise right now? Not to declare victory until the votes are independently certified. Which is weeks after election. And Donald Trump was saying, hey, I think there's going to be election fraud, I want our poll watchers to pay attention.

If you see something, say something. So the liberals jumped on him about that. Oh, look at that. You know, he's not going to trust the results of election. On the other hand, Biden said you, I promise. And so the conservatives are jumping on Biden, saying, oh, look at that, he lied. He lied. He did declare victory a few days after the Election Day. OK, to say Joe Biden lied is like to saying it is like saying a dog barked.

It's like saying water is wet. Joe Biden's been lying for decades. That's not the point here. The point and I've tried to ask people about this on Facebook and on Twitter, and hardly anybody wants to bite, the point is, why did Chris Wallace ask that question? Do you both promise you won't declare victory until the votes are independently certified, which is going to be weeks later? Why does he establish that new. Idea that new standard except for 2000.

When Al Gore took thirty six thirty seven days to try to steal from George W. Bush, we've always known who the victor was within 24 hours of Election Day going back to 1876.

Why did Chris Wallace want to change that? To me, when I went back and watch and saw him do that, is Hillary Clinton's voice is ringing in my ears.

Well, I think Joe Biden should concede under any circumstances. Just wait. We're eventually going to.

I mean, it reminded me of Stephanopoulos back in 2012 asking Mitt Romney, well, do you think states should be able to outlaw birth control?

And Romney's like, do I know what excuse me, is this thing on? What do you what are you talking about? Out of the blue man, out of the blue. I just thought I'd throw that out there. All right. Lines are jammed at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Every time I change callers, one will open up for you to try to get through.

Let's take it right at the top. Let's go with Russ in Atlanta. Russ, you're on the Mark Levin Show Aquash for filling in. What's up? Hey, doc, great show.

I'm calling to ask you a question. Yeah, I keep getting my hopes up. Obviously, living in Georgia, seeing all the ridiculous shenanigans that are going on, I get happy and then only to find that I'm let down. Right. And with this with this Supreme Court thing, the Texas Supreme Court thing, I'm kind of beginning to feel the same way. I have a hard time believing that the Supreme Court's going to have the backbone to get in and make a decision that would change the outcome of this fraudulent election.

And I'm just calling because I want to know what's what do you think what do you think the Supreme Court's appetite is for this?

That's a good question, I don't know, but I do know that Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Have a long history of ruling in a constitutional manner.

I do know that President Trump picked Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy CONI Barrett. With a distinct impression that they would rule based on the Constitution. And I think if that is the case. And again, the Texas lawsuit is so different than the other ones. It's not even about proving fraud, even though they do have a lot of attachments about the fraud. If if what I'm saying is correct, and this is a simple matter of these four states are violating the Constitution.

I don't know how on earth. Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy CONI Barrett can get around that, I you know, I heard the pain in Mark's voice last night when I listen to the show.

And he was so disappointed about them not taking that Pennsylvania case immediately. And Mark is a brilliant attorney, he's a lot sharper guy than I am, so I don't know. But I'm looking at this going, OK, wait a minute. It looked like on Monday Alito was signaling that I got some votes here and we're going to do this thing. And then. A few hours after Texas files suit, I'm wondering if they didn't take it right away because they were thinking, like the president is saying today on social media.

Texas is the big dog. This this suit is is the real thing. This is what's going to do it. And you're going to take out four states, including Pennsylvania, you know, instead of, you know, just piecemeal one at a time.

So, you know, I'm not Nostradamus. I don't have a crystal ball. But it looks like to me that this is tailor made. And again, the point has been made. The Texas suit goes directly to the Supreme Court because the Constitution says that if there are states that have legal disputes against each other. It doesn't go anywhere else, it goes to the Supreme Court. Now, I don't know that Roberts and the Libs would be interested, but if you got five votes, you got five votes and there's the deal.

So I'm wondering if that's the reason that at the last minute they said, OK, wait, no, we're not going to do the Pennsylvania thing. And they didn't give any, you know, explanation for it because a Texas thing had been filed like 12 hours or whatever earlier.

And they're like this. This is the one this is the deal right here.

Does that make any sense to us? Yeah, it does, it does, and I think that's kind of like right along the way that I'm feeling and I hope they do take it and I hope that we do see justice and nothing would make me happier than to see Nancy Pelosi. Have to hammer the gavel and say that Donald Trump is president. That would be divine. Yeah, absolutely. Russell, great. Colbran, appreciate it. God bless you.

Thank you very much. Yeah. I had put together a montage of celebratory music for election night that I still have not been able to use on my my local show yet. And yeah, that would be a lot of fun. Now, never forget. Clarence Thomas remembers. What Joe Biden? Then chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee did to him 29 years ago what Clarence Thomas referred to as the high tech lynching of an uppity black man.

And I don't want to say to you, I don't want to imply I don't want you to infer that Clarence Thomas has been looking a way to get back a Biden. That's not what I'm talking about. I believe Clarence Thomas is going to rule, according to the Constitution, the matter of his bitterest enemy, that's the defendant or the plaintiff. Because I just believe he's going to rule in the Constitution. All I'm saying is it would be poetic justice.

Mm hmm. Yeah. All right, let me see. Eight, seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Let me go to fill in Midland, Texas. Phil, you are on the on the Mark Levin Show. Doc Washburn filling in what you got. You do a great service.

You got I actually felt the same way you did when they turned that down from Pennsylvania, that they had this juicier, more wide, wide spread scenario that they could really, you know, go go for it. And that's the same thought that I had. But here's my question. You know, when we had all this stuff come about in these swing states, the first thing that came to my mind is, hey, wait a minute, five of these states have Republican legislators.

So I'm thinking now this this is this is great.

This is on our side, you know, and we had two Republicans in Georgia, in Arizona. This, you know, we've got a chance to have the legislators, you know, stand up and and do their job and. Right. And, you know, when you're a detective and you're researching a crime, you get all the circumstantial evidence that leads you in a direction where you're going to go to find this criminal. Well, we have all this circumstantial evidence.

We have affidavits. Why can't that be the Supreme Court say, OK, we're going to take it back to the states, to the state legislators, and we're not going to allow them to give or giving it. And then it's going to go to the house. I mean, isn't there enough information to see what I mean, what has happened, the fraud, the lying, the cheating that the right thing to do by the Constitution is just do not allow any of these states to certify their electors and nobody will get to 270.

Then it automatically goes to the House where the people who elected these represent these congressmen will still get their voice, because according to what Obama and Justice Roberts, that elections have consequences. And so I mean that I mean, is that is that plausible? Yeah, but the thing, Phil, is that you got to put it in front of the Supreme Court. That's why you hope and you pray that the president has good attorneys or in the case of Texas, you know, the attorney general there, Ken Paxton, I'm sure is is also very sharp or, you know, if Sidney Powell should be able to get one of her lawsuits in front of the Supreme Court.

You got to you got to use the right words.

You got to get the right case in front of the Supreme Court. And again, maybe maybe that's why they kind of stiff armed the Pennsylvania case for the time being to go with the Texas case. And I totally agree that was my first thought when that happened, because you got guys like Clarence Thomas and Amy Barrett and Alito that these are strong conservatives, you can always count on at least Alito and Thomas because we haven't had really a history of any CONI buried.

But the right thing to do is, I mean, nobody how can anybody say that there was no fraud or the attorney general saying that stupid comment he made when you have all these swing states stop voting? Yeah. I mean, stop counting now. I mean, I'm just but I've got to tell you, there's a slight positive in my feeling. But I'm going to tell you, if Joe Biden is sworn in as president, I just kind of going to just bow out of politics, bow out of talkradio, because it's what what good is it doing is because the Republicans are the they're just so weak in the backboned.

A lot of Mormon a lot. Look, I'm in Arkansas, which is a very red state, and most of the Republicans in our congressional delegation aren't saying much about this at all. There's one of them, one of the six, Rick Crawford, who is U.S. representative out of eastern Arkansas, has been consistently out there on social media saying this is insane, this can't stand. We got to stand up for a president. But all the rest of them are being pretty quiet.

Phil, I appreciate your call, brother. God bless you. Make some good points here. Coming up, I want to tell you I want to make my case in just a couple of minutes for why I. A, realize that if Biden were sworn in. If we did allow them to steal is saying, I don't know how we come back from it, but on the other hand, I don't think that's going to happen. So that's coming up.

Doc Washburn filling in for the great one. Mark Levin.

Mark Levin. As we enter the Christmas season, most of us stop to consider our many blessings, while Hillsdale College wishes to thank you for standing with them as they celebrate over 175 years of blessings since 1844, Hillsdale has held fast to its mission to provide the kind of education essential to preserving free government. And for decades, the college has extended its educational mission on behalf of liberty through a variety of outreach programs. Perhaps you receive an Prima's for free every month, or have taken one of Helstone excellent free online courses or have attended one of Hillsdale free regional events.

Now you know of Hillsdale s refusal to take even one penny of government money. This independence allows the college to focus on promoting its core purposes, learning character, faith and freedom without any government interference. At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for the kind of classical liberal arts education that Hillsdale offers on its campus and nationwide. So during this season of Blessings, Hillsdale thanks you for your partnership. In extending its mission to the country.

To learn more about Hillsdale College, visit Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom and.

Hey, Stock Washburn filling in for the great one, Mark Levin from his affiliates in Little Rock, Arkansas Karyn. OK, I said before the break.

Look, I get it. That if we let Biden and the commies steal this thing, I don't see how we come back from it. I understand that. But I think Trump understands it, too. Recently, a tweet that he put out there on Twitter from 2012 resurfaced. He was talking about computers switching votes from Romney to Obama back in 2012.

OK. I think he's known this scum for eight years. I think that the executive order. He did in September, twenty eighteen. Making our federal elections a critical part of our national security infrastructure meant something. I think a lot of people are trying to. Basically disrespect Sydney Powell. I don't think she's crazy. She's a former federal prosecutor. She's a brilliant attorney. There's a reason General Michael Flynn has her as hit his attorney. General Flynn is very close with the president.

And so when Cindy Powell says the team was sitting there on election night watching them steal the votes in real time. Why would she say that it's not true? Don't discount the possibility. The president Trump might have a few aces up his sleeve that he's not talking about. You know, I. I'm on social media a lot. I don't have time to be on Facebook very much because I got to be on Twitter because that's where news breaks and I'm looking forward to parler hope when everything goes over there.

And that's great. I got a placeholder account there, but I'm a. Not a normal person like yourself, I got it all the time to be looking for breaking news and stuff on on Twitter and I see so many conservatives.

So furious. So furious with Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham, by the way, now special counsel John Durham and FBI Director Christopher Wray. And they're like, why didn't the president just go ahead and fire these people, they're not doing a damn thing. This is ridiculous. I don't know why he puts up with them. Well, he fired a big cabinet secretary about six days after the election. But it wasn't anybody has anything to do with the O.J. fired his secretary of defense, Mark Esper.

And he replaced him with a spec ops. Legend, a guy named Christopher Miller. And also, they put a guy named Ezra Cohen, Wantonness Palmy, Ezra Cohen, Wapnick in charge of spec ops, who did a little speech there right about then talking about how now spec ops is on the same level with secretary of the Army, secretary, Navy, secretary of the Air Force. You heard about the stuff and they took a guy named Kash Patel.

Who was definiteness right hand man when they brought out all the stuff about the Russian hoax and he's a chief of staff of the security fence. But President Trump didn't make any DOJ moves. He may move the Dodie's. Well, I think that is. I just think there's a lot more going on. Then is out there on the surface and never forget a guy named Sun Tzu, s, u, n, t, z, you, the art of war, always try to make your enemy think that you are disorganized and fumbling around and there's dissension in the ranks and the them like a hammer, who knows could happen.

Crazier things have. Right. Doc Washington in for the great one. Mark Levin.

More coming up. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here now broadcasting live from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. And the stock watch for an afternoon talk show host from Mark's affiliate in Little Rock, Arkansas. Kate are in now, so I do the show at the biggest talk radio station in Arkansas in Little Rock.

And I have always admired our senator, Tom Cotton.

He graduated Harvard Law, joined the United States Army, but instead of being an attorney and judge advocate general's corps, he chose the infantry. Tom Cotton risked his life in combat for our country in Iraq and Afghanistan when he could have had a cushy job as a military lawyer. So always nothing but respect for me to Tom Cotton. So. Tuesday of last week, one of my callers said he was concerned that Senator Cotton had been on our morning show on CRANN and didn't sound like he thought the president had much of a path going forward to win this thing.

And that didn't sound right to me. Because I've said consistently, if we let them steal this obvious landslide for President Trump, I don't know how we come back from that, but a lot of times I don't get up early enough to hear interviews on the morning show.

So I hadn't heard that one. So we got it. And we played the relevant part back on my show. And it began with our morning show host asking Senator Tom Cotton.

If it was time for the president to accept a Biden win and move on and so let me see, I don't know if I get the volume right on this, but but here we go. Here was Senator Cotton's response.

We had a huge election in the Senate and the House and state legislatures, not in spite of the president, but because of the president. OK, wait a minute. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. You know what? You know what, I'm sorry, that was the that was the wrong one. That was the wrong one. OK. Whatever. That was that was oh, I get it. That was from the that was from the Fox and Friends.

I'm sorry, I'm getting goofed up. It's live radio. Anyway. Senator Tom Cotton went on on on our morning show and and and said this.

However, the evidence has to be adduced in court and it has to stand up to scrutiny. And you're right that some of the claims that some people who are purporting to represent the president are simply not supported by the evidence. OK, so that was kind of troubling to me. That was kind of troubling to me. I mean, will will they be proven in court or will they won't prove in court what evidence, what claims, what's not supported?

I don't know that that kind of confuses me. So here is more from Senator Cotton on our morning show in Little Rock.

So as more and more states certify their elections and the evidence is not there, that there was sufficiently widespread fraud or irregularities to change the results, not just in one state, but in every state that would change the results of the Electoral College. It does become time to move on towards an orderly transition. That's one reason why the president last week directed the General Services Administration to release the federal money and office space and resources to Joe Biden's team so they can begin to prepare for that.

OK, first of all, I read the letter from the director of the General Services Administration when she announced that she was going to release several million dollars to Joe Biden for the transition. First of all. She and her staff were getting death threats, a lot of death threats. Secondly, she made it very clear in her letter. Not only does a GSA not determine. Who won the election, but there's nothing in the law or the Constitution which gives her any direction.

On what to do as far as releasing money to a transition team in the case of a contested election, which is clearly what we have going on here.

It's also unclear whether she made the decision while the president made the decision. What is clear? Is that the GSA director releasing money to Biden for a transition has absolutely nothing to do.

With the idea that President Trump signaled he's done because he certainly hasn't, good grief, but wait, but wait. There is more. And it goes like this, like this is all playing out in accordance with legal processes. And I'll continue to do so through December 14th when the electors meet in their various state capitals to cast their ballots.

Really, Senator Cotton? I don't know how to say this because. Again, Tom Cotton graduated Harvard Law, and I sure didn't. But I can't find anything in the Constitution which says that a presidential election cannot be challenged past December 14th. This is not in their. As a matter of fact, we didn't know who the winner of the 1876 presidential election was until 48 hours before the inauguration and back then, that was in early March.

So then our morning show guy. Asked Senator Cotton why the process continues now, remember, this was eight days ago, this is Tuesday morning last week as a big proof of big fraud and whether the president's refusal to give up was undermining the election process.

If any results are going to change, of course, the proof has to be produced in court and has to be a court victory when you pass the election when the campaign is over, which was the time for politicians during the time for lawyers and letting the facts and the law dictate the results of the case in a presidential election. That's the case in the recount that we've had in Arkansas that we still have in places like Iowa and New York, where you have congressional races that are decided by six or 13 votes.

OK, that's good.

There's definitely a lot going on in the courts. More from Tom Cotton on our morning show from Tuesday of last week.

Now, we have seen, as I said, evidence of irregularities or survive. And I think that legislators at state level and in Congress should take that seriously and review it in the future to see what we can do to better secure the safety of our ballots.

Oh, really? In the future. Again, if we let them steal this landslide from us, there won't be a future. Donald Trump got more votes than anyone ever has, including, in my humble opinion, Joe Biden. If we let China and Big Tech steal this election, they will also steal the two upcoming U.S. Senate elections in Georgia and then we're done. If we let them steal this, there will be no securing the sanctity of our ballots in the future.

They'll do away with the Electoral College, make Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia states, thus adding four more Democrat senators and pack the U.S. Supreme Court, where does that end? I mean, this is this is unbelievable to me. And yet here's more, but without evidence of sufficiently widespread irregularities or cries that with the results and not just one but three critical states, then you would expect the Electoral College to cast a vote on December 14th and that that will be the end of the matter.

I was so disappointed. The nonchalance really disturbed me. First of all. There's more than enough evidence of fraud to flip the results in more than three states and I believe there was eight days ago. When Senator Cotton went on our morning show in Little Rock. Second of all, a whole lot of people in Arkansas believe the Tom Cotton plans to run for president in 2024. He'd probably be a good president. But if we let them steal this, I don't know how we will ever be able to elect another Republican president because, see, the plan obviously is to lock the fraud in place.

The plan is to make sure the whole country runs like the well oiled machine, a fraudulent FILEA and fraudulent Detroit. If we let them steal it, I just don't see how we come back from that. So I called Tom Cotton out on that on my local show Tuesday afternoon of last week, also on social media.

The next morning, somebody texted me. A tweet from President Trump. Which said thank you to Senator Tom Cotton for the really nice words and all we are doing and have done, we will win exclamation mark.

So that was confusing, I knew it could not have been in response to what the senator had said on our local station the day before. So I did some digging and found out he was on Fox and Friends. Steve, Ainslee and Brian, the next morning, the hosts were calling Biden the president elect, which is always frustrating for me because first of all, I don't believe he is. And secondly, I was disappointed the senator didn't push back.

Would it have hurt to say something like, well, now wait a minute, this thing isn't over yet? The Fox and Friends hosts asked Senator Cotton about some of Biden's cabinet nominees, and he did a great job of explaining how radical these people are, no question about that.

But it's just really troubling that the whole thing was presented as a done deal, a fait accompli, if you will, as the interview went on, I was wondering what in the world Tom Cotton had said that got such a positive response out there on Twitter for President Trump the next day.

And then this happened, I think the president will have a very positive impact in Georgia, just look across the country, got 10 million more votes than he did in twenty sixteen. Remarkable turnout and that helped Republicans win the Senate seat that we did and helped us gain House seats against all the expectations of the Democrats in the media. We had a huge election in the Senate and the House and state legislatures, not in spite of the president, but because of the president.

So he's going to go down to Georgia and he is going to rally those supporters and urge them to get out to vote for his good friends and allies. David Perdue and Kelly Leffler one more time on January 5th. That's what is so essential if you want to preserve everything that we hold dear about this country.

So that was Tom Cotton's answer when Brian Kilmeade asked what impact the president would have when he went down to Georgia to campaign for Senators Kelly Loffler and David Perdue last Saturday. So that's it. And every word of that is true. Tom Cotton is one of numerous Republican politicians who understand what is at stake in Georgia. By the way, if you're registered to vote in Georgia, please get out and vote for Kelly Loffler and David Perdue. What I don't understand is people who get how important the upcoming election is in Georgia, but don't seem to understand how important the resolution of the presidential election is.

I mean, listen again, listen again to what Tom Cotton said on Fox and Friends a week ago today.

We had a huge election in the Senate and the House and state legislatures, not in spite of the president, but because of the president.

Right, exactly. Finally, thank you, Tom Cotton. That's how, you know, President Trump won in a landslide.

No president run for re-election has ever been defeated when his party picked up seats in the House. It is inconceivable it has never happened. Donald Trump won this thing in a landslide. You know what? I know it. Tom Cotton's words lay out the evidence succinctly. What I don't understand is why more Republican officeholders aren't making the case, why more Republican politicians aren't rejecting the narrative that Joe Biden is somehow president elect just because the media says he is. It's incomprehensible to me.

And by the way, God bless Senator Ted Cruz for volunteering to argue one of the Pennsylvania cases before the Supreme Court, if somehow that should happen. All right.

Eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one to get in the conversation, Doc Washburn filling in for the great one. Mark Levin.

Mark Levin. Did you know your family can save over 800 dollars a year just by switching to pure talk from Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile? Think about it. What could your family do with an extra 800 dollars? You don't even have to sacrifice coverage. Pure talk has exactly the same coverage, same bars as one of the big carriers. But they charge you half. You definitely don't have to sacrifice customer service. Their team is based right here in the U.S. and are some of the nicest people you'll ever talk to.

So don't wait anymore. Get unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. No, not even a penny. So go to Pure Talk, USA Dotcom and a promo code Lhevinne podcast that's elevon podcast. And when you do, you'll also save 50 percent off your first month. Folks, this is the best. That's pure. Talk to USA Dotcom Promo Code Lhevinne podcast Pure Talk USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

Doc Washburn filling in for the great one, Mark Levin for his affiliate in Little Rock. And I don't think I've ever said this on radio before, but I will be the roundabout.

All right. We got breaking news.

President Trump. Has asked Texas Senator Ted Cruz. To present a case from his state's attorney general seeking to invalidate the election results of several key battleground states before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Should it decide to hear the suit? New York Times reported that today, that's a beautiful thing, that. As beautiful thing, I don't know if y'all old enough to remember, but back to the primary season. 2015, 2016. There was no love lost between. President Trump and Ted Cruz, and once he got elected. And this president and the senator looked at each other and said, I tell you what, why don't we team up for the good of the country?

I thought you never. Yes, good idea. And that's what they did. That's what they did. God bless Texas and God bless our president and and Senator Cruz. All right, eight, seven, seven three eight one three eight one one. Let's try to get some calls in here. Let me go with you. Got a couple of minutes for a Jimmy in New York City. Jimmy, you're on the Mark Levin Show. You're filling in.

What's up, brother? You're doing a great job, just as just as Iran has terror groups, proxy terror groups that work for Iran as terrorists in several areas. Our enemies have proxy political groups and proxy movements. One of the movements in America from the communist Chinese is a group called the Chinese Progressive Association. OK, so the Chinese Progressive Association works for Red China, but they set up a group called Seed the Vote and they take credit. They take credit for changing the vote or bringing the vote to Biden in six of the seven swing states.

Now, when they say they said they did it through massive voter registration and get out the vote. But that's sort of the wink wink. You know, they do dirty work. This is a communist movement. And now Frank Gaffney, who is a top national security guy for President Reagan on his website, he lays it out. So Frank Gaffney, who worked for Reagan, has a website. It's give me a second here. I just lost it.

And he's a good guy. It's the committee on the present danger. You could check out the committee on the present danger China. And it's laid out there with the Chinese communists say they did in the six of the seven swing states. So our enemy operates here. You know, the Soviets have the World Peace Council, the World Council of Churches. They have the Institute for Policy Studies and they had several other groups. That's the National Council of Soviet American Friendship was a KGB operation at the same dress address as Senator Kerry's Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

So the enemy operations here have been going on for decades, decades. China now, the last 30 years or so out there big time. And everybody, all the enemies celebrating Biden, they want him to be president. So Trump really has to continue to fight. And he does.

Yeah, he does. Jimmy, great call. Brother, I appreciate your great information there. Thank you very much. God bless you. Frank Gaffney, Committee on the Present Danger. I suppose a lot of Mark's listeners have already seen that viral video video out there of the Chinese government official laughing about them helping to get Biden elected. It was pretty quickly wiped off of social media in China. But it's it's it's out there on Twitter and I bet it's out there at Paletta.

All right. More calls coming up at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. I am Doc Washburn filling in for the great one.

It's an honor to be a Mark Levin. Mark Levin here, it's no secret that this has not been the year for vacations, and if you're a timeshare owner, that expensive annual vacation destination is probably gone to waste while you're stuck paying for it. And let's be honest, with all the uncertainty in the world, do you really think you'll be able to use it next year? Why continue to pay for something you cannot use? Listen, it's time to make a change and put an end to those costly fees and monthly payments called time-Share termination team.

Today, they'll get you out of your timeshare legally and permanently guaranteed and with 100 percent success rate. They're a team you can trust. Mark Levin, listeners get 20 percent off when you terminate your timeshare, call one 888, get you out or visit time-Share termination team Dotcom today. That's one 888 Ghetty than the letter you owe UTI or visit time-Share termination team dot com today. time-Share termination team. They'll get you out. Mark Levin, radio's hell raising intellectual call now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

Hey, Doc Washburn filling in for the great one.

Always an honor, always an honor to get the call. Am I crazy? Am I crazy when I look at this thing and go, OK, wait a minute. Trump got at least 10 million votes more this time the last time. But they want us to think that. Biden got like 15 million more votes than Barack did in 2012. 12 million more than he did. In 2008 and. Trump could pack an auditorium or an airplane. Runway or whatever, 30 or 40000 people.

Subfreezing weather. And Biden could even get 100 people to show up, right? Now, when Barack was running. He was like a rock star, he could fill a stadium and he did. But when he went to campaign. For Joe Biden a few days before the election in Philly. A drive in rally or whatever can get more like 100 cars. For that matter, Mr. Producer, I don't know if you saw this, but. This is a weekend before the election.

Jon Bon Jovi himself. He and a couple other people were campaigning for Joe Biden, singing there their songs, playing their music. For like 12 people and seven pumpkins in eastern Pennsylvania couldn't have been too far from New Jersey, where Bon Jovi is from, and I don't know if a lot of my listeners in the South realize this, but up in Jersey, Bon Jovi, he's like a rock star, you know.

1000 to. 1000, three thousand for which I might even get a chuckle out of nothing. OK, guys, anyway, thanks. Thanks so much. I can feel the love, thanks. I'll be here all week. Kemberly Friday for the no smoking show. Be sure to try the veal. Remember your waitress.

So we're supposed to think this guy that nobody would show up for, nobody would go to his rallies, got over 80 million votes. You know, that's not true. We all know that's not true. Even Adam Schiff. And Eric Swalwell oh, oh, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to curse on the air. He's got some issues.

Eric Swalwell, the media is saying, by the way, that Chinese spy, they're the cute looking gal.

Did you have some kind of a thing going on with her? And Swallow's office was we have no comment.

So I had to call it before the bottom of the outbreak said, you know, they have ways of infiltrating and they got spies, they got organizations and felt like saying, yeah, they kind of got a honeypot sometimes to, you know, anybody in the World War One history Matahari.

They say that history doesn't always repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes. OK, all right.

Eight, seven seven three eight one three eight one one time to get some callers in here. Let me go with Tyler and Altus, Oklahoma, who's been very patient.

We appreciate you're on the Mark Levin Show, Doc Washington filling in.

Tyler, what do you think? Is Tyler going? Oh, there you go. It's going good, sir. What you got? You can hear me. Yeah. LOUDHAILER go right ahead. So I think the Republicans that we need to learn how to chew gum and walk at the same time. And so this this Georgia thing, I mean, we do not give up on Trump in any way, right? Yes, he did win the election.

We need to fight that out, whatever. But this Georgia election, it's like the difference between Republicans and Democrats that were always caught flat footed. I mean, I don't know how they didn't they didn't pay attention to the fact that the Democrats had changed the law in Pennsylvania a year ago. Why didn't they sue that? You know, that that's just stupid.

But this thing in Georgia, I am very afraid. And it was as soon as I saw that number go below 50 percent for David Perdue on election night, and I knew it was a fraud. Mike, there's no way they had to get that number just right. And they're like, you know, the algorithm they used to to cheat. You know, they did that. And so I was like, great. Now, every member of Antifa, where are they right now?

Well, the Antifa, Klux Klan, all the KKK people, they were on buses to go to Atlanta to take up temporary residence, to register to vote. And I'm I'm I'm confident that they were going to do that and that George Soros and whoever else is going to be paying to get these guys there. So what the Republicans need to do and they need to do it now and not wait until after the two Senate seats are lost is they need to sue in federal court and make it so that anybody who voted anywhere else in the entire country on Election Day is ineligible to vote in that runoff because no one has the right to count as more than one person and one person.

One vote is sacrosanct. And so they need to make it so that the equal protection clause of the Constitution is protected and make it so that anyone who voted anywhere else cannot vote in that race. And I don't know why no one's talking about that, that they that, you know, there are I mean, it was the Andrew Young even said he was going to move to Georgia and help him win.

So, you know, Tyler, you make a very valid point. And and to go a little bit further, my understanding is. That in a lot of states, and I'm pretty sure Georgia is one of them, I read about this somewhere the other day. You don't even have the legal right to vote in the runoff if you're a Georgia resident registered to vote and you didn't vote in the general election. You know, I'm saying, you know, I don't know about that, but I mean, I don't know about that because I mean, I guess there could be a case where they, you know, they're doing a protest vote during the during the primaries or whatever.

Yeah. I mean, as long as.

No, you're right. You're right. There should be some kind of preemptive action. But the problem is. Sydney pal Michael Flynn's attorney, who's bringing suit against several states on the electronic monkeying around here with Dominion Systems, she's already said Governor Kempt. And Secretary of State Raffensperger are corrupt. You know, when you got allegations out there that they've been bribed, you have some real problems and President Trump is called these guys out also. So I think that a lot of things need to happen between now and January 5th.

That that Georgia runoff, I think you're right, I don't know about Loffler because she was in like a general election was kind of like a jungle primary. There were a bunch of people on there. But there's no way, no no way in the world that Perdue legitimately got less than 50 percent. There's just no way. But he didn't he did not just say they changed the numbers at the end. Right, exactly. Make sure he was just under there and then they're like, OK, we've got it.

Right, exactly. You know, for that matter. And I appreciate your call, Tyler. God bless you. Thank you. For that matter. I think when it's all said and done, if you can get audits and you go back and get the legit vote. I think you're going to see a Republican pickup in the United States Senate in Arizona and one in Michigan, I don't believe Doug Kelly beat Martha McSally in Arizona and I don't believe. That John James was beat by Gary Peters, the incumbent Democrat in Michigan.

If you take care of that foolishness. Then you still need to elect Loffler and and produ. But, you know, we shouldn't lose any seats in the Senate, all right, eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Let me go to Bob and Bend, Oregon. Bob, you're on the Mark Levin Show Squasher filling in.

What's up, brother? Oh, well, I'm out here listening to all this crap going on, I wanted to bring up really old yeah. Back in 1948, Lyndon Baines Johnson was running for his first seat in the US Senate. Yep. And they were counting the votes. OK, yep. And he was behind by about 50 votes. So his campaign manager has left and went over to Dallas, Texas, and came back with a ballot box at two hundred and fifty ballot.

Yep. They were all filled out the same, the same handwriting.

The Byzantine scandal is what it's called in history. But go ahead. Yeah, I know. OK, we call it the landslide win rended take up. And all that I can say, that stuff has been going on since nineteen forty eight. And I am glad that at last we've got somebody up there fighting to try to stop this stupid crap. That's all I really want to say.

Well, Bob, I appreciate your passion, brother. Appreciate your heart. God bless you. Thank you very much. You are correct. A few years ago, I found out.

Something I never knew about. The Watergate Committee. United States Senator Sam Ervin was in charge of that and old line Democrat. The Watergate Committee, I was in high school, and instead of go to the cafeteria, we used to bring a lunch so we could run the homeroom and watch the Watergate committee hearings, a little black and white TV. And I think that's crazy. But we did what I didn't know was when they were putting the committee together.

The Republicans on the Watergate committee wanted to investigate. The election fraud and the funny business. That LBJ, President Johnson, had done. And the Democrats who were in the majority in the Senate like, oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. We're just going to investigate Nixon and Watergate. Too bad you don't have the votes. Did you have any idea? Had you ever heard that? It shocked me when I found out about it.

Just like people saying, you know, it's a shame we don't have anybody anymore that we can trust in the mainstream media on the Net, the evening news on NBC, CBS or ABC colleague Walter Cronkite, Brussels, December 12th, like 79 foul what sport owes.

So shame we don't have anybody like it anymore. Uncle Walter, a guy we could trust. And then I found out a few years ago he lied to us. He was a big lib. Vietnam War, the Tet Offensive, we won, he told us we lost. He lied to us. The things you find out all these years later. All these years later, you find out that. Teddy Kennedy in the early 80s reached out to the Soviet Union to try to figure out how they could conspire to keep Ronald Reagan from being re-elected.

He should go to prison for that. The evidence came out when the Soviet Union fell the Venona papers while the KGB archives came out. Didn't he use his friend, John Tuni, former senator, Democrat senator from California, as intermediary? I believe you find out all these stuff, these things years later. Well, Teddy's gone. He had to answer to a higher court. Mary Jo Kopechne unavailable for comment, but I don't know. I just don't think there's any kind of.

One of the statute of limitation on treason, you know, for people that are still here, I'm just asking. So coming up in March 3rd, our. We're going to have some. Explosive testimony. From a U.S. Senate committee yesterday. Dr.. Who says it looks like they may have a cure for the communist Chinese coronavirus, that's coming up at the top of the third hour.

More of your calls coming up in just a few moments at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one as the Mark Levin Show continues, the Doc Washburn filling in from Little Rock Month Luvin.

Did you know your family can save over 800 dollars a year just by switching to pure talk from Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile? Think about it. What could your family do with an extra 800 dollars? You don't even have to sacrifice coverage. Pure talk has exactly the same coverage, same bars as one of the big carriers. But they charge you half. You definitely don't have to sacrifice customer service. Their team is based right here in the U.S. and are some of the nicest people you'll ever talk to.

So don't wait anymore. Get unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. No, not even a penny. So go to talk. USA Dotcom and a promo code Lytvyn podcast that's elevon podcast. And when you do, you'll also save 50 percent off your first month. Folks, this is the best. That's pure. Talk to USA Dotcom Promo Code Lhevinne podcast Pure Talk USA Simply Smarter Wireless.

I'll take some smoke gouda, if it's all the same to you. Beautiful Christmas that love that stuff.

I'm Doc Washburne from Markes affiliate Corren in Little Rock. And let's try to get some calls in here at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Want to go to Sandy in Lebanon, Indiana. Sandy, what's up? Hi, thank you for taking my call. Yes, I am so excited to get to talk to you. I was listening to your show earlier. Yes, ma'am. And I agree with you 100 percent. President Trump has a lot of things going on behind the scenes that we don't know about.

And truthfully, we don't need to know about. Right. We just need to be patient and sit back, you know, now do what we have to do, what we can do and what we can do to stay positive. Sure. Of giving in. Well, it's over. No, it's not over. He's not going to concede. He's he stepped into this position knowing what he was getting into. I would have left the first week, but he stayed he stayed in that position, he's put up with everything for us.

We have to show him that we're not given up and we're backing him. And we can do that even when we're not at rallies. We can still be positive when we're single, sitting, sitting out, you know, sitting back. And the positivity is is going to be in the air. And when we get together, when he has those rallies, we all just have to show up if we have drive rallies, anything, any kind of thing, so that he sees used to have us.

We have your back and we are depending on him. Yeah.

And Sandy, I was talking to a friend the other day who is financially pretty well off, said, well, what can I do?

I said, well, if you're well off, it might not be a bad idea to, you know, make a contribution to Sydney Powles. See, for it's not tax deductible. Trump's legal team. I don't know if it is or not, but, you know, if you got a couple of bucks, might not be a bad thing to do, you know.

But but, yeah, you know, I notice to President Trump tweeted, I think it was earlier today on election night, the bookies in Vegas were giving him like 97 percent chance of winning. And oddly enough, they haven't paid off yet. So you got the AP out there and all the mainstream media.

What do you mean you won't see President elect Joe Biden? You know, he's the president elect.

I'm like Vegas and paid off. What do you talk about? No. Then everybody needs to leave that fake media, fake news, fake everything alone. They can listen to you guys. They can listen to Newsmax and leave everything else alone because they're only they're trying to program everybody. And it's not going to work because the biggest part of us are the working class. I'm one of the middle class working class. What they don't what those Democrats and those bad people don't realize is that we've worked hard.

All right. We're not giving up. No, we're not. Never had that. We're not together.

We're not. Sandy, great call. I got to run to it. But thank you so much. God bless you.

By the way, remember Life, Liberty and Livin Sunday nights on Fox and then they repeat it on Saturday night. You want to check it out this Saturday night? Daniel Horowitz, a great Daniel Horowitz conservative review, was on talking about the election mess. If you didn't catch it last Sunday, catch it this Saturday night. IDOC Washbourne in for Mark Levin. From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by AMAY, the Association of Mature American Citizens.

Now over two million conservative members Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support. And you can become a member at Armacost U.S..

Join me here. Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mike. And also the Department of Health and map from the state, I'm in Arkansas several times a day. And I shared the numbers on these maps with my listeners every day on my local radio talk show in Little Rock. I warned my listeners repeatedly how contagious this disease is and how important it was for them to do what I was doing at the time.

When Dr. Fauci and the CDC announced how important it was to wear a mask. When you go out, I started wearing masks faithfully. When any of my listeners called me up to disagree, I recited the party line as politely as I could. About how contagious covid is and how we couldn't be too careful. Well, my first moment of doubt. Was when the New York Health Department announced they were going to add 3500 people to the covid death total.

Whom they had not actually tested for the disease before they passed. I'm like, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, what? Well, we're pretty sure they had it. Later. The CDC edited their website without telling anyone. To reflect their newfound belief that people do not actually catch covid-19 from dry surfaces after all.

What? Still later, an official spokesperson for the World Health Organization made the claim. That people did not actually contract covid-19 from asymptomatic people. Of course, that claim was walked back a few days later, but the point had been made. Eventually, the director of the CDC admitted that hospitals had a financial interest and positive covid-19 cases now in March of this year. Both Dr. Anthony Fauci and the surgeon general pleaded with us not to wear masks if we were healthy.

When they changed their tune, they and the CDC. Told us that the mask does not protect the wearer. But it certainly does protect other people from catching Kowit from the where, you know, if you don't realize you already have it. However. A few weeks ago, CDC director Robert Redfield publicly announced. He thought wearing a mask would protect him better than taking a vaccine would. Now, the University of Arkansas medical system is running ads saying the mask also protects the wearer.

I'll bet hospitals are doing the same thing wherever you live to, if they aren't, they will be soon. How the narrative shifts. Does anyone remember the document signed by hundreds of front line health care workers a few days after the death of George Floyd, declaring social justice is more important than social distancing?

Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.

All these folks who called Trump rallies super spreader events. Suddenly wanted people to take to the streets to. Quote, peacefully protest, unquote. Well, I think Trump started calling his rallies peaceful protests now, did you hear? The CDC announced several days before Election Day that voting was so important. That if people who had tested positive for covid had not early voted, they should go to their polling places even if they were symptomatic. That's crazy. For Thanksgiving, the CDC recommended avoiding singing and shouting, keeping music levels down and limiting alcohol consumption for no apparent reason.

So I guess the music's too loud and then you're more susceptible to catch the stuff. It's insane. Now that a New England Journal of Medicine article dated May 21st, twenty twenty by four doctors and a nurse says and I quote. We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, part of me offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to covid-19 as face to face contact within six feet with a patient with symptomatic covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes.

So the chance of catching covid-19 for a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic, unquote.

But what really put the icing on the cake of hypocrisy was the news with accompanying photos that California Governor Gavin Newsom. Recently attended a loud dinner party indoors. An expensive restaurant called the French Laundry in Napa Valley Wine Country. With 21 other people in the same room. There were no masks, there was no socialist distancing. The party was attended by people from the California Medical Association, including the CEO and chief lobbyist. Now we see that those who set the rules, at least in California.

Don't believe what they tell us. If Governor Newsom of California and the head of the California Medical Association actually thought they were at risk, they would have worn masks and practiced socialist distancing as they insist the rest of us to. Governor Newsom recently insisted his citizens put on masks between bites while eating at home.

Two days after the pictures of his dinner party were published, he announced he was shutting down all restaurants for indoor and outdoor dining in ninety four percent of the state, he's throwing thousands of people out of work. A few weeks ago, Alabama Crimson Tide football coach Nick Saban tested positive for covid-19 on Wednesday, so everybody thought he was going to be allowed to coach that Saturday's game. But he tested negative Thursday, Friday and Saturday. So he's good to go.

So how many false positives are there out there? Millions of Americans test positive for but never exhibit symptoms, we're supposed to believe they have it. How do we know if they actually have it, R and B music artist Erykah Badu recently tested positive in one nostril and negative in the other in quick succession at the same setting, same nurse. What we do know is we're dealing with a disease with something like a ninety nine point ninety eight percent survival rate.

Well, we also know. It's when the U.S. covid death toll hit 180000. The CDC announced 94 percent of those people who died with Koban had an average of two point six other comorbidities. So so they were only sure that about ninety eight hundred people actually died from covid. The rest of the one hundred eighty thousand die from covid are just with covid. Because it was just with it. And fewer than 10000 people have died from it. Well, then, more people die from the H1N1 back in 2009, a regular pandemic without mask mandates and shutdowns.

By the way, it has also been reported that deaths from the flu and pneumonia this year are way down. And the number of overall deaths has not increased since last year. So, again, I mean, overall deaths in this country from everything. So, again, we have allowed our leaders to do untold damage to our way of life because of fear of what a disease with a ninety nine point ninety eight percent survival rate will do to us.

In mid-November. Former U.S. Secretary of education under Barack Obama, Arnie Duncan in Chicago announced he and his family had tested positive for Koed. He was perplexed, he went out there on Twitter and he said, how do we catch it? I don't know. We wore masks. We socially distanced, we avoided crowds, we haven't had people in our house. So. There is plenty of evidence available that people who do exactly what our overlords tell us to do get it anyway.

Coming up, I got bombshell testimony from yesterday's Senate hearing. And a lot more, plus your calls at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. I'm back. Washburn filling in for the great one.

Mark Levin, much love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy.

Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.

Join amoc instead. A m a c us.

Doc Washburn filling in for Mark Levin from his Little Rock affiliate KIRO in.

OK, before I get to the bombshell testimony from yesterday's Senate hearing, I want to share with you something a fellow named Rich Higgins put on Twitter back in July.

Here's what he said in four months. The U.S. transformed into an obedient socialist country. Government dictated what events are acceptable to attend. Violent protests that instill fear are OK, but church services, family funerals and patriotic celebrations are dangerous. And you bought it without a fight standing a graduation line is a safety hazard. Small businesses were forced to close, but crowds to support the corporate money machine. At Wal-Mart. Lowe's and Home Depot are OK. Come on, man, it's just a mask.

Come on, man, it's just safety precautions. Hey, how about a little hush money? Here's twenty four hundred dollars that we stole out of your paycheck in the first place. Enjoy, buy something with it. For a big corporation, cash is dirty, we don't give change is a coin shortage. Use your card in four months, they convince you to use a traceable card for everything. Unless a four months government closed public schools, then restructured education under the guise of public safety, unless of four months, our government demonstrated how easily people assimilate to so-called guidelines that have no scientific premise whatsoever when you are fearful, unless in four months, our government successfully instilled fear in a majority of the population in America that allows them to control every aspect of your life, including what you eat, where you go, who you see, and even purchasing toilet paper, and the most dangerous and terrifying part.

People are not afraid of the government who remove their freedom. They're afraid of their neighbors, family and friends, and they hate those who won't comply. It's absolutely terrifying to me, as so many people don't question authority. They're willing to surrender the critical thinking skills and independence they just gave up without thinking, without a fight.

You know what's coming next? It's just a vaccine. Come on. It's for the greater good. Wait until you're told you can't enter any store or business without proof of the covid-19 vaccine. Wait until you can't go to public events or get on a plane without proof of receiving the vaccine to everyone that doesn't believe this is possible.

Do you understand that government successfully dictated to people when they were allowed to be outside, where they were allowed to go and how their children would be educated? The last four months. And that a majority of the population follow blindly because they were told to do so. You're kidding yourself if you think this behavior won't be repeated with a vaccine or whatever the next step is.

I don't follow politics. Who cares about that stuff? I don't like to think about it. They got you. Without a thought. Without a fight. Just like France. Just like Russia. Just like China. Welcome aboard, comrade. That was Rich Higgins'. Back in July on Twitter, and I couldn't have said it better myself, now we got this bombshell testimony coming up about a possible cure for the covid-19 at the bottom of the outbreak. But let me grab a phone call here real quick.

First, Andrew in Cape May, New Jersey.

You're on the Mark Levin Show with Doc Washburn. What's up? I just wanted to let you know I'm a professor of medicine and I'm very upset that these experts are not understanding the fundamentals of immunology. And in other words, in order for the immune response of our body to take over, we have to come in contact with a pathogen mask are useless. There was a study done about 20 years ago, surgical mask to have a seven minute life span and then the absolutely useless.

Well, most people don't want to do the research and understand what's going on.

Right. Right.

Well, there's a Danish study that recently came out to about masks being useless. But, you know, the crazy thing is, you know, I go in a restaurant, if I got a mask on, I can smell the food. I can smell the perfume from the lady next to me. But I'm supposed to think that nothing can get through the mask. Andrew, does that make any sense to you at all?

It makes absolutely no sense. And we should not let bureaucrats rule our lives. We need to stand up on our own two feet, educate ourselves and say enough is enough. How long is this going to go on until the world comes to an end?

I think it'll probably go on longer in blue states than red states.

And I don't think that if and when President Trump is inaugurated a second time, there will be mandatory vaccines or anything like that. I'm sure that Biden would be just fine with it, though. If you catch my drift. And your great call, brother, appreciate your patience. God bless you. Thank you very much.

So the testimony coming up in front of Senator Ron Johnson, chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, from yesterday.

And this is a bombshell, I believe. More coming up straight ahead, Doc Washburn filling in for the great one, Mark Levin.

AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more.

And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead. A m a c U.S..

The Mark Levin Show, the pool feed for the conservative media division, now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Hey, Doc Washburn filling in for Mark Levin from his affiliate in Little Rock. And OK, now here is Senator Ron Johnson yesterday in a meeting of the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. He is the chairman. Here we go.

Our next witness is here in person, Dr. Pierre Corey. Dr. Corey is the former associate professor in chief of the Critical Care Service and medical director of the Trauma and Life Support Center at the University of Wisconsin and recently joined the ICU service at Aurora St.. Luke Medical Center in Milwaukee. He is board certified in critical medicine and pulmonary diseases and internal medicine that Corey has traveled across multiple states in the US to care for covid-19 patients throughout the pandemic. He's also the president of the Frontline covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, a non-profit organization of critical care specialist led by Professor Paul Polymeric, whose mission over the last nine months is focused on the research and development of effective treatment protocols for covid-19 using repurposed drugs.

He received his M.D. from St. George's University School of Medicine. And I only add that we added Dr. Chory very late to our, I think, a hearing in May because I'd heard of his development of, I guess, antiinflammatory steroids in critical care on covid. And I have to tell you, I've had doctors come up to me and thank me for holding that hearing where they listen to you change their thinking. They believe they've saved their patients lives because of your testimony at that hearing.

I hope your testimony will be as impactful today, Corey.

OK, now, so this is Dr. Corey. He's obviously. A serious doctor with impeccable credentials, as you just heard, so as one of my favorite YouTube song reaction guys. Javon or Javon over GVC TV would say, let's get into it and see what he has to say.

Senator, thank you and thank you for holding this hearing. I just want to start out I didn't think I'd have to say this, but I unregister my offense at the ranking members opening statement. I was discredited as a politician. I am a physician and a man of science. I have done nothing, nothing but commit myself to scientific truth and the care of patients and and to hear that I'm here because of a political angle. I am not a politician.

I'm a physician.

Wow. OK, now for the record, ranking member on that committee as Gary Peters, Democrat senator from Michigan, a nasty piece of work. If you're aware. There's certainly enough fraud there that it's obvious that Democrats stole that state from President Trump. I would think you could say the same thing about Peter's Republican challenger, John James. All right. Now here is more more from Dr. Peter Corey.

I want to start out by saying that I'm not speaking as an individual. I'm speaking on behalf of the organization that I'm a part of. We are a group of some of the most highly published physicians in the world. We have nearly two thousand peer reviewed publications among us, led by Professor Paul Maric, who's our intellectual leader. We came together early on in the pandemic and all we have sought is to review the world's literature on every facet of this disease, trying to develop effective protocols.

Wow. So actually, look at the evidence, man. It that sounds like a great idea.

You just mentioned that I was here in May. I recommended that it was critical that we use corticosteroids in this disease when all of the national and international health care organizations said we cannot use those. That turned out to be a life saving recommendation. I am here again today with a new recommendation in the last nine months in our review of all of the literature as a group. Again, we are some of the most highly published physicians in our specialty and the world.

We have done nothing to try to figure out how to identify a repurposed and available drug to treat this illness. We have now come to the conclusion after nine months, and I have to point out I am severely troubled by the fact that the NIH, the FDA and the CDC. I do not know of any task force that was assigned or compiled to review repurposed drugs in an attempt to treat this disease.

Wow. OK, I'm troubled, too. I mean, why would that be?

Everything has been about novel and or expensive pharmaceuticals, engineered drugs, things like socialism, AB and Rindell, severe and monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. We have hundred years of medicine developing. We know we are expert in all the medicines we use. And I do not know of a task force that has been focused on repurposed drugs. Well, I mean, this is just crazy.

I will tell you that my group and our organization, we have filled that void. That is all we have done is focus on the things we know and things we do. And I'm here to tell you, Dr. Reiter, he just presented he has one study of the many that I want to talk about and I want to talk about that we have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact. And when I say miracle, I do not use that term lightly.

And I don't want to be sensationalized when I say that that is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last three months.

Wow. I mean, this sounds really good, right? When I am told and I just heard this in the opening sentence, that we are touting things that are not FDA or any recommended, let me be clear, the NIH, their recommendation on ivermectin, which is to not use it outside of controlled trials, is from August twenty seventh. We are now in December. This is three to four months later. Mountains of data have emerged from all from many centers in countries around the world showing the miraculous effectiveness of ivermectin.

It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. If you take it, you will not get sick. Oh, my goodness. Wow. I mean, if this is true. Then all Lockdown's all mask mandates, which, by the way, don't work anyway, should cease immediately. I want to briefly summarize the data. We have contributed more to the medical knowledge of our specialty in our careers than anyone else can claim as a group. And our manuscript, which was posted on medicine, preprint server, details all of this evidence.

I want to briefly summarize it. Number one, we have evidence that ivermectin is effective not only in prophylaxis, in the prevention. If you take it, you will not get sick. We just came across a trial last night from Argentina by the lead investigator Reviver invented in Argentina, Dr. Hector Caraveo. They prophylaxis 800 health care workers. Not one got sick in the four hundred that they didn't prophylaxis with ivermectin. Fifty eight percent got sick. Two hundred and thirty seven of those four hundred got sick.

If you take it, you will not get sick. It has immense and potent antiviral activity. We know that from the first study at Monash it has made the bench to the bedside. This this is amazing. Again, this is Dr. Peccary, Aurora Critical Care Service, Milwaukie. Testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs just yesterday, saying we have the cure for covid. Now, I hope the CDC and the NIH and the FDA and perhaps more important, your primary care physician will pay attention to this.

I mean, I would think Ron Johnson would have a way to get this to the White House, but anyway, your ears more prophylaxis.

We now have four large randomized controlled trials totaling over fifteen hundred patients each trial showing that as a prophylaxis agent, it is immensely effective. You will not get sick, you will be protected from getting ill if you take it in early outpatient treatment. We have three randomized controlled trials and multiple observation as well as case series showing that if you take ivermectin, the need for hospitalization and death will decrease. The most profound evidence we have is in the hospitalized patients.

We have four randomized controlled trials there, multiple observation trials all showing the same thing. You will not die or you will die at much, much, much lower rates, statistically significant, large magnitude results. If you take ivermectin, it is proving to be a wonder drug. It is already won the Nobel Prize in medicine in twenty fifteen for its impacts on global health. In the eradication of parasitic diseases. It is proving to be an immensely powerful antiviral and antiinflammatory agent.

It is critical for its use in this disease. Wow. I mean, I'm so we again stand by our manuscript.

It is a scientific matter. It's been submitted for peer review. But please recognize peer review takes time. It takes months. We do not have months. We have one hundred thousand patients in the hospital right now dying. I'm a lung specialist. I'm an ICU specialist. I've cared for more dying covid patients than anyone can imagine. They're dying because they can't breathe. They can't breathe. They're on oxygen delivery devices. There are non-invasive ventilators and or they're sedated and paralyzed and attached to mechanical ventilators that breathe for them.

And I watch them every day. They die. By the time they get me in the ICU, they're already dying. They're almost impossible to recover. Early treatment is key. We need to offload the hospitals. We are tired. I can't keep doing this. If you look at my manuscript and if I have to go back to work next week, any further deaths are going to be needless deaths. And I cannot be traumatized by that. I cannot keep caring for patients when I know they could have been saved with earlier treatment and that drug that will treat them and prevent the hospitalization is ivermectin.

Well, OK. Now, what must it be like to be a frontline health care worker dealing with patients who die knowing there's a cure, but for some reason not being able to get it to them?

I am here today. I'm calling to action the NIH. Their last recommendation was August. Twenty seventh, August twenty seventh. I want to be clear. I am not here as a politician or a dramatist or sensationalizing what I'm recommending. I'm going to be very clear and very simple. All I ask is for the NIH to review our data that we've compiled of all of the emerging data. We have almost thirty studies. Everyone is reliably and reproducibly positive showing the dramatic impacts of ivermectin.

Please, I'm just asking that they review our manuscript. It is a serious manuscript by serious, highly experienced physicians and researchers. I cannot call on more credibility than we have. We're not just a random doctor who's saying that we have a cure. I don't want to say I have a cure. I'm just asking review our data. We have immense amounts of data to show that ivermectin must be implemented and implemented now.

All right. So Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin doesn't have explosive testimony like this if he thinks Dr. Corey is some kind of nut. So what happens next is Ron Johnson draft a letter to the NIH asking them to look at this. CDC, FDA.

If you're in Wisconsin, you listen to Mark Show on WUIS in Milwaukee or WIPA and Madison or the big eighty nine out of Chicago, Ron Johnson Jr.. Senator, if you're in Wisconsin, you might want to call his office and ask him about this. Look, I got one more clip, Senator. The last thing I want to say is, you know who's dying here? It's our African-American and Latino and elderly is some of the most disadvantaged and impoverished members of our society.

They are dying at higher rates than anyone else. It's the most it's the most severe discrepancy I've seen in my medical career. And we are responsible to protect those disadvantaged members. We have a special duty to provide countermeasures. The amount of evidence to show that ivermectin is lifesaving and protective is so immense and the drug is so safe. My colleagues have talked about it. It must be instituted, implemented. I'm asking the NIH to review our data and come with recommendations for society.

Thank you. Hippocratic Oath first, do no harm or even better. And the words of scripture, even as you don't in the least of these. Eudunda to me. All right, all of Mark's listeners in Wisconsin, you know what to do now while I'm at it, let me give you the names of the other Republican senators on the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, who I guess were at the hearing yesterday. Rick Scott in Florida, Rand Paul in Kentucky.

Rob Portman, Ohio. James Lankford, Oklahoma. Mike Enzi, Wyoming. Mitt Romney Utah. And Josh Halling, Missouri. If you find Dr. Korey's testimony about the efficacy of the drug ivermectin as a preventative and possibly even cure for covid. When I call your senators office, ask whoever answers the phone if they plan to address this with the NIH, the FDA, the CDC. Why not, who knows, you might even save a life. All right, your calls coming up at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.

I'm Doc Washburn, filling in for the great one. Mark Levin.

Mark Levin. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. EMAC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more.

And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Armacost. That's a m a c dot U.S. stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join AMOC instead. A m a c U.S..

And this is Doc Washburn filling in for Mark Levin. Let me let me see how many calls we get in here before the show is over. Let's go with Paul in Conway, Arkansas.

Paul, you're on the Mark Levin Show. Doc Watson, fill in.

What's up, brother? Hey, we're listening in from Kara, and we're proud of you, Doc. And we've been watching these reports also and hearing from friends of ours about what's been happening with ivermectin in South America. I've got kids with compromised immune systems who are suffering from depression. They're so bummed out. They've missed out on everything this year. But we found you can buy ivermectin at the farmers supply store, tractor supply store. So we bought enough to treat six people for less than 20 bucks.

Wow. Tractor supply. That's a big change in labor. I'm sorry. What? It's even apple flavored for the horses. So if you know somebody that's sick and they're on their you know, their last legs, I mean, you do whatever you can do to help people. Yeah. Yeah.

Even better, they're not on their last leg yet. Try to catch it early. Paul, great. Appreciate that very much. Thank you very much. Good to have some some local folks from Arkansas listening in. All right.

And we got people who've been waiting forever and ever to try to get on. Mike in Chino, Arizona. Let's go with you. You're on the Mark Levin Show. You're filling in. What's up, Mike? Oh, I've been waiting for a while. Yes, the Supreme Court should be taking this case, it's in their own interests to take this case. Let's talk about Texas of being.

Excuse me. The Texas case, yes, the Texas the Texas case is in their interest to take it, because if they don't, Chuck Schumer has already said he wants to make their voice worthless on the impact the court wanted charges on there.

Yeah. Oh, you're absolutely correct. You're absolutely correct. And I believe they will take it. And again, I'm not the sharpest knife in the ferment or the brightest bulb in the drawer.

But I just wonder if after it look like you take the Pennsylvania case and the Texas case dropped and all sudden, just one line. Now we're going to the Pennsylvania thing right off the bat. If it's because they saw the Texas case and they're like, OK, here's red meat.

This is something right here, because one of the things about it that I read and I appreciate you call my God bless you, one of the things about it that I read is if a state has a legal conflict with one or more other states, then that goes to the Constitution, says this. Now, that goes right to the Supreme Court, right to the Supreme Court. And this would be a first impression, and you don't have to go anywhere else.

And wise man once said work like everything depends on you pray like everything depends on God. And that's what we should all do. That's what we should all do. I'm Doc Washburne from Mark Levin's affiliate in Little Rock. They are in such an honor. Such a pleasure. Always to fill in for the great one. And we'll see you out there in social media. Twitter parler. I'm all over the place. From the Westwood One podcast network.