Transcribe your podcast

Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College now and it's one hundred and seventy fifth year. Hillsdale is a truly independent institution where learning is prized and intellectual enthusiasm is valued. Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to Hillsdale for their sponsorship is here.


Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Love that. For America, it's Mark Levin finally back. Welcome, welcome, Leibnitz. Welcome, America. Our number is eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one one three eight one one.


Missed you very much. We've been keeping busy on parler and on Twitter.


You know, we no longer post on Facebook.


I've had a lot of discussions, I've had senators calling me, congressmen calling me, I've gone to battle with several of them. And I've really been chomping at the bit to talk to you directly. You're hearing conservatives and pseudo conservatives the. The bizarre editorial pages, including at The Wall Street Journal, which trashed the Tea Party 10 years ago, which basically is a mouthpiece for McConnell.


You've heard people who defend the Constitution being attacked by the likes of Ben Sasse and Adam Kinzinger. Viciously attacked with utter and complete fiction and poison. Let me tell you from my perspective, here's the problem. From my perspective, without counting even one fraudulent vote. Our precious constitution. Was targeted. And systematically attacked. By a Democrat party that embraces the 16 19 project and Tifa Black Lives Matter and detests our Constitution. This is the history of the Democrat Party.


Going back to before the Confederacy, including the Confederacy and slavery, segregation, and now today with the neo Marxists and these so-called democratic socialists. You see, for the Democrat Party, which has now been hijacked. By the radical extreme left, the Constitution is a problem. It's not to be revered. It's to be eviscerated. Which is exactly why Chuck Schumer has said. That should they win these two seats in Georgia tomorrow. 50/50 Senate with Kamala Harris, they argue, as the president of the Senate.


They will have a 51 to 50 majority to push through whatever they want as they eliminate the filibuster rule, destroy the courts and separation of power and a bunch of other things.


Because they hate the Constitution. The Constitution places a severe limit. On that kind of power and grandiosity that the Democrat Party wishes to exercise. It wishes to destroy and control the private sector. And it wishes to destroy and control our constitutional republic. These are the facts. This is the background. The question is this. If you have a Democrat Party. That unleashes legal. And lobbing attacks prior to the election. Throughout the country, but specifically on battleground states.


With the Republicans control both houses of the legislature. And therefore, Republicans through the legislature controls the electoral process in that state and ultimately the selection of electors that ought to be counted on on January 6th, two days from now, and a joint session of Congress. If you're a Democrat. If you're a Biden supporter, if you're a leftist, you have to figure out how to get around Article two, Section one, clause two of the Constitution. It doesn't take a genius.


It takes corruption. Pennsylvania, that's exactly what took place. The Republicans control the legislature and the legislature is supposed to direct how electors are chosen. Each state shall appoint in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct. A number of electors equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in Congress. If that's not complied with. If it's not the state legislature. That directs how electors are to be chosen. But a secretary of state.


But a governor, but an attorney general. But an elected majority on the Supreme Court of the state. Or even a federal judge. If entities, public officials, institutions other than the state legislature is directing the manner in which electors are to be chosen, elections are to be held. They have poisoned. Right out of the gate. Poison. The constitutionally elected process within that state. You with me, Mr. Producer? You're with me, America.


So at the front end of Article two. The electoral process instituted in that given state. Violates the federal constitution, it is unconstitutional. I don't care how many people voted. That's of no consequence. That's not relevant. We're not a parliamentary system, we don't directly elect anybody but members of the House of Representatives. And so when a state conducts itself that way. Are there there'd be no consequences. So the electors that that state. Certifies through the executive branch, not the legislative branch, the Democrats that control in most of those states the executive branch and send those to the archivist to be held and then sent to the vice president and to the joint session of Congress on January 6th.


Are those electors to be counted? And to have an effect on the selection of the president, the vice president of the United States, even though at the front end of that constitutional provision, the front end. Those states did not comply. Did not comply with the Constitution openly. And brazenly broke the law. You will be amazed. At the legal mental midgets who write me arguments about how that could be wrong and so forth, I don't even respond to them.


I don't even respond to them. Well, the Supreme Court doesn't matter what any court said. You're the court. Read the language. You don't have to have a single fraudulent vote, a single fraudulent ballot to conclude. That the election in that state. Violated and intentionally violated the United States Constitution. That's exactly what the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania intended. That's exactly what the governor and the secretary of state of Pennsylvania intended. And it's not just their.


They eliminated signature requirements, they eliminated postal stamp date requirements, they extended the days of voting change the time of voting and on and on and on, the legislature never did that.


Michigan. A Republican legislature, the Democrat secretary of state, unilaterally changed the state's laws with respect to absentee ballot applications and signature verification. She just sent unsolicited seven million ballots. To the voter lists. And direct and intentional circumvention of the state legislature and state law. The election in Michigan that took place as a result of a Democrat secretary of state. What's unconstitutional? In Wisconsin. The Elections Commission. And local Democrat officials in the state's largest cities, the Democrat cities, Milwaukee and Madison, at the top change the state's election laws.


They placed hundreds of unmanned drop boxes in strategic locations. In violation of state law, the locations were intended to be convenient to the Democrats. They told would be voters how to avoid security measures like signature verification and photo ID requirements. Tell me how many news organizations have reported this to you? None. So they bypassed the Republican state legislature.


The Democrats. The voting in Wisconsin as a result of what took place there, the selection of electors is unconstitutional. Right, Tom McClintock. Unconstitutional. In Georgia. You have a Republican secretary of state who just taped a phone call with the president of United States and they leaked it to the media. And of course, the media, for the most part, don't put the full transcript out. They do. They're cherry picking. And then, of course, the media say it's worse than Watergate.


Everything's worse than Watergate. But we don't care what the media think and say, do we? They are corrupt through it, through enemy of the people. So in Georgia, this reprobate secretary of state. Now, March six, twenty, twenty. There's this lawsuit, the Democrat Party, Georgia versus Raffensperger Raffensperger. So he enters into a settlement. Which results in a consent decree. Making it far more difficult to challenge defective signatures beyond the 20 to express mandatory procedures set forth in Georgia state law as determined by the state legislature.


Among other things, before a ballot can be rejected, the settlement required a registrar who found a defective signature to now seek a review by two other registrars and only if a majority of the registrars agreed that the signature was defective. Could the ballot be rejected, but not before all three registrars. In other words, it goes on and on and on. They made it virtually impossible to reject a vote. Now you know why. The mail in an absentee ballot, rejection rates across the country, we're now almost non-existent.


But those laws were changed by a rogue secretary of state buckling to a lawsuit encouraged. By Stacey Abrams, whose sister sits on the bench and is overseeing decisions about voting roles, in which case she rules each and every time for the Democrat Party in this upcoming Senate election. Here's four battleground states with the Democrats winning with litigation, with the Democrats pressured their statewide executive officials to get around the Republican state legislatures. So those electors who were certified. Had been poisoned.


Now, when we come back, what do we do about this? I'll be right back. Much love in. I know you love freedom. How do I know that? Because you listen to my show and my show and everything I do is all about preserving freedom and the form of government that secures it for us. It's the same with Hillsdale College, one of the very best truly liberal arts colleges in the nation. That's why I talk about them all the time, because Hillsdale is committed to pursuing truth and defending liberty.


Hillsdale teaches stellar students to defend freedom no matter what they major in, whether it's science or music or economics or business, whatever. Hillsdale teaches them how to defend liberty. And they do that for you, too, through their free monthly digest of constitutional thought. It's called in Primus, five point six million Americans receiving Prima's for free each month. And you, my friend and fellow freedom lover, should be reading it, too. You can subscribe for free at Lhevinne, for Hillsdale Dotcom, that's elevon for Hillsdale Dotcom, no strings attached.


Generous donors who want to preserve freedom for future generations make it possible for all of us and for Hillsdale to send in Prima's to you for no cost every month. Start receiving and reading and Primus so you can know how to defend the freedom you love. Visit Levin for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's elevon for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.


Having attacked.


Attack the electoral process in key states through litigation, through their governors, through their secretaries of state, their boards of elections, their mayors and the salary of the United States Supreme Court.


To uphold. Article two, Section one of the Constitution, despite the fact it had the opportunity to do so. Now it goes to Congress, now in the Constitution, it says. The president of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the vote shall be counted. Person having the greatest number of votes shall be the president. And then it goes on. I actually heard a conservative member of the House of Representatives on me on this earlier on the Larry O'Connor Show.


Say the word is ciao. So Congress has no choice but to count them. You know, you cannot take your seat in the House of the Senate of the United States Congress unless you swear an oath to your country in the Constitution that you will uphold the Constitution of the United States.


Is there any other scenario? Well, there's an election. And individuals or institutions have violated the election procedures. That the person counting the votes, knowing this is required to count those votes. Have you ever heard anything so absurd and irrational and illogical, and then they'll point, they'll say the Constitution says shall they shall be counted. The Constitution says this is the way electors are to be chosen. And once they're chosen that way, it's a matter of logic, it's a matter of.


A fundamental rationality, and once they're chosen that way. They shall be counted. That the framers had to say in the Constitution. That they electors have to be chosen constitutionally. Wouldn't that be a little repetiteur? In order for them to be counted, they just assumed. That in order for them to be counted, shall be counted. That the manner in which the electors were selected and certified in the first place complied with the first part of that provision of the Constitution.


So here we are as conservatives and Republicans or constitutionalists of any break dancing on the head of a pet, dancing on the head of a pet while the bastards in the other party have already eviscerated our electoral process. I'll be right back. I know you love freedom. How do I know that? Because you listen to my show and my show and everything I do is all about preserving freedom and the form of government that secures it for us. It's the same with Hillsdale College, one of the very best truly liberal arts colleges in the nation.


That's why I talk about them all the time, because Hillsdale is committed to pursuing truth and defending liberty. Hillsdale teaches stellar students to defend freedom no matter what they Najran, whether it's science or music or economics or business, whatever. Hillsdale teaches them how to defend liberty. And they do that for you, too, through their free monthly digest of constitutional thought. It's called in Primus, five point six million Americans receiving Prima's for free each month. And you, my friend and fellow freedom lover, should be reading it, too.


You can subscribe for free at Lhevinne. For Hillsdale Dotcom. That's elevon for Hillsdale Dotcom. No strings attached. Generous donors who want to preserve freedom for future generations make it possible for all of us and for Hillsdale to send in Prima's to you for no cost every month. Start receiving and reading and Primus so you can know how to defend the freedom you love. Visit Levin for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom. Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom. Mark Levin, tough as hell.


That's why I like Mark Levin and I'm not sure a lot of people like him. He's tough as hell, but I like him. I love a call it No.


Eight seven seven thirty eight one three eight one one.


So now we have in place in these states and others electoral systems that were built not by the state legislatures.


But by the Democrats in these various positions. And only the legislature, which has to direct the appointment of electors, is mentioned in the Constitution. This is how the Democrats plan to win office the presidency for sure, forever more. This is how they intend to turn the country into California. And there are Republicans who will go right along with this. They'll come up with one cockamamie argument after another, they'll turn the Constitution inside out, so you're to believe they're the real constitutionalists and textualists.


They have no clue. I don't know what's going to happen in Georgia tomorrow, but did you ever think you'd be sitting on the edge of your chair hoping that we win two Republican Senate seats in the state of Georgia?


Well, there's reasons for that, and one of them is the manner in which the elections are being handled by the secretary of state there, which just announced that he's going to talk with the district attorney and the election board over the legality of his conversation with the press in the United States.


Let me point out what I'm talking about, the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal, maybe you've seen some of these guys. They have a Fox program on the weekend that really nobody watches. You got Paul Jeggo, who runs the operation there.


He's been running it for decades. And they are corporatists, that's what they are. They're not conservatives, they're not constitutionalists, they favor open borders and on and on they are corporatists. They've always been corporatists. It's called The Wall Street Journal, after all.


It's not called the Main Street Journal. And so they put it under the phrase editorial board, you'll see this at National Review and other places where they don't want individuals names attached to it and they believe this will give it more umph.


What will the editorial board at The Wall Street Journal, it's five nerd's, five geek's. That's what it is.


That's their editorial board. The title is The Election Rejectionists, and this is how they do what they do. They sit on their fat asses and Manhattan. And shoot spitballs. Have mainstream America, as Americans like to tell the world, a hallmark of democracy is the willingness to accept defeat and the peaceful transfer of power. The tragedy of the last two presidential elections has been the refusal of partisans to accept defeat and public trust in American self-government is eroding as a result.


So now what they've done. In their first two sentences. If they have put on an equal playing field, the Democrats spying Dossie face abuses. Felonious leaks unmasking and on and on and on and on now comparing that to you and me and others. Raising Civili legitimately, legally, constitutionally. Issues in this election, that's how perverse. These nerds at the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal are. And they go on the main issue now is that too many Republicans refuse to accept Mr.


Trump's defeat, more than 100 House members and others have this week, and at least 12 senators say they will formally object to the editorial electoral college count. This will change the result, though. We'll delay it as Congress spends up to two hours debating the objections to each state's results. More corrupt, a precedent and the resulting political damage.


You see how they position this, I just told you what took place in at least four states, there's not a word of that, not a word of that in this editorial, because the geeks are either too stupid. So they think they're clever. The leading culprit here is Mr. Trump. As always, refuses to accept responsibility for defeat. We call it here. Not a word about the state's. Recall that he has claimed that Iowa caucus results were stolen in 2016 when he lost to Ted Cruz.


He's now spinning conspiracy theories and election falsehoods daily on Twitter. Have I spun a conspiracy theory, ladies and gentlemen, when I told you what took place in these states? He doesn't seem to care what damage he does and promoting the myth of his victory. The damage is spreading as Mr. Trump puts pressure on other Republicans to take up his lost cause.


Presidents never called me, never pressured me. And so basically The Wall Street Journal thinks that none of these Republicans can think for themselves, none of these Republicans can digest what's taken place all around them. And, of course, the extent to which the members of the Wall Street Journal, esteemed editorial board have actually gone into these communities and find out what has taken place is zero. Note that the senators in their statement don't allege specific acts of fraud. A Wall Street Journal editorial page, there are hundreds and hundreds.


I have sworn affidavits that allege specific aspects of fraud, if you publish them, have you listed them on your editorial page? You'd have to reduce the font to the point where people would need a magnifying glass to read it. So don't play games with your readers. They're smarter than you are. Instead, they cite allegations of fraud and irregularities that feed deep distrust of the results, distrust they and the president are feeding. So now it's the president's fault, it's the fault of these Republican senators.


The courts have rejected every Trump campaign attempt to intervene in the state results, often by judges appointed by the president. Let's stop there. I keep hearing something like 60 cases were brought by the Trump campaign in 60 cases were lost. First of all, the Trump campaign didn't bring 60 cases. I brought far fewer than 60 cases, but let's show you what kind of reporting. And sophomoric surface level thinking this is at the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal.


Let me talk about one of those cases.


One of those cases, a lawsuit was brought challenging. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, as well as the executive side of Pennsylvania, all Democrats, the five members of the seven on the Supreme Court for interfering and undermining exactly what I said. Article two, Section one, clause of the Constitution where the state legislature gets to determine how electors are are appointed or chosen.


But the Supreme Court took that power away from the state legislature. No signatures, no signature comparisons, no postal dates. If postal dates are smudged, too bad they changed the the time of the election, the final time, the final day.


They changed what observers are allowed. In other words, they rewrote the election laws the way they rewrote. The Republican legislatures gerrymandering of the of the congressional seats, as a result, the Republicans lost two Republican seats because the Democrats on the Supreme Court elected.


Our rogue, their political. Now, that case went to the United States Supreme Court. And it still sits there today that's considered a loss, Wall Street Journal think that's a loss. In terms of a civil lawsuit that should never have been brought, a lawsuit that shouldn't have challenged any of you understand? You understand this is a this is a pathetic editorial that cherrypicks. There's no serious analysis here. All lawsuits aren't the same, all petitioners aren't the same, but they don't get lost everyone.


Actually, they didn't lose everyone. But even so, what does that say about the judiciary? What does that say about the United States Supreme Court? A lot, and most of it not good. As Republican Senator Pat Toomey, who's retiring. Has shown the voting evidence from Pennsylvania is that Mr Trump lost fair and square. Why would you cite Pat Toomey for that, Pat Toomey doesn't have any idea what took place. He wasn't involved in any of this litigation.


Why don't you point out some of the people who were involved in this litigation or some of the House members, Republicans in Pennsylvania? And some of the elected state delegates and state senators who've made comments quite contrary to Pat Toomey, but you wouldn't know that based on this editorial. Mr. Trump's narrow loss was personal as voters decided they didn't want four more years of his raucous governance, is that what happened?


No, they're projecting over there at The Wall Street Journal because they're corporatists, they don't like the things that Trump has done. They're corporatists.


And they think that Biden. Well, they can do business with bad. Just the George W. Bush said he could do business or maybe it was Thatcher, but Putin. The Electoral College gambit won't work this week because House Democrats won't go along, but imagine if Republicans ran the House and did 81 million Americans who voted for Mr. Biden would be disenfranchised by an insiders scheme. The political responsibility, volcanic and understandably so. Republicans would be crushed in the 2022 midterms.


Imagine. The unconstitutional changes that have taken place carry forward as the baseline for 2022 and especially 2024. How difficult will we be to elect a Republican president of the United States? Donald Trump got. 12 million more votes this time around. The last time. So apparently some people do like his raucous governance, quote unquote. In our view, this week's exercise is also unconstitutional. So we have constitutional scholars, experts on The Wall Street Journal editorial board. They're no more expert at interpreting the Constitution than they are expert.


And interpreting prognosis from a proctologist. They're not explaining anything, the text of the original charter elaborated by the Fourth Amendment gives state legislatures the power to appoint electors. The vice president is charged to open the votes to be counted, nothing more. Isn't it amazing?


The very provision they paraphrase. Is actually the Article two, Section one clause, too, that we've talked about, not the 12th Amendment, but in this respect, that part of the Constitution. And they drive right by the driver's. And the only power the Congress has. As to count. Unconstitutional elector votes, according to The Wall Street Journal. They just have to count on that's it. You have to ask yourself. With a framer's and those who soon followed after them so stupid that they would give the huge power.


To Congress and only Congress could count votes, why would they give that to the archivist of the United States? The Electoral Count Act of 1887, which the House and Senate will act upon, is unconstitutional, giving Congress the ability to second guess those state decisions. These guys are such narcissists and egomaniacs, they've now determined they talk about Trump, but listen to these guys and stretching this law for a partisan exercise. Republicans are also giving Democrats more ammunition to use in their campaign to overturn the Electoral College in favor of a direct popular vote.


And it goes on.


Apparently, the clowns who are on the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal have not heard what Chuck Schumer says. They don't need any instigation, provocation, encouragement to destroy our Constitution, perhaps they've heard of the 16 19 project, perhaps they've seen Black Lives Matter, which is embraced by the Democrats and attacks our founding. Perhaps they saw the attacks on our monuments. Perhaps they're aware of what's going on in our colleges and universities. And perhaps they're aware that Chuck Schumer has announced that if they win those Georgia seats, they intend to destroy the judiciary, the independence and separation of powers of those two branches.


They intend to destroy the United States Senate by packing it with more Democrats.


They intend to ram through every radical neo Marxist piece of legislation they possibly can by eliminating the filibuster. And they intend to destroy the Electoral College, which they have done in this election cycle. And The Wall Street Journal is worried about us, you and me. Encouraging them to do it. Maybe it's time for new editorial board over there at The Wall Street Journal because this one. Is so out of touch. And as a collective IQ of negative nine.


I'll be right back. Much love in. I know you love freedom. How do I know that? Because you listen to my show and my show and everything I do is all about preserving freedom and the form of government that secures it for us. It's the same with Hillsdale College, one of the very best truly liberal arts colleges in the nation. That's why I talk about them all the time, because Hillsdale is committed to pursuing truth and defending liberty.


Hillsdale teaches stellar students to defend freedom no matter what they may drink, whether it's science or music or economics or business, whatever. Hillsdale teaches them how to defend liberty. And they do that for you, too, through their free monthly digest of constitutional thought. It's called in Primus, five point six million Americans receiving Prima's for free each month. And you, my friend and fellow freedom lover, should be reading it, too. You can subscribe for free at Lhevinne, for Hillsdale Dotcom, that's elevon for Hillsdale Dotcom, no strings attached.


Generous donors who want to preserve freedom for future generations make it possible for all of us and for Hillsdale to send in Prima's to you for no cost every month. Start receiving and reading and Primus so you can know how to defend the freedom you love. Visit Levin for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's eleven free Hillsdale Dotcom Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom and.


I want to remind you of this Wall Street Journal, the corporatists Polje go his merry gang of buffoons back on July 27, 2011.


They were at war with the Tea Party. Why? Because McConnell and Boehner were at war with the Tea Party. And this corporatist rag is a mouthpiece. For McConnell. Boehner and, of course, Paul Ryan, and the headline was Tea Party hobbits need to go back to Middle Earth. Remember that none of these critics have is an alternative strategy for achieving anything nearly as fiscal year politically beneficial as Mr. Boehner's plan. The idea seems to be that the House GOP refuses to raise the debt ceiling.


A default crisis or gradual government shutdown will ensue. The public will turn en masse against Barack Obama. The Republican House that failed to raise the debt ceiling would somehow escape all the blame. Then Democrats would have no choice but to pass a balanced budget amendment and reform entitlements and so forth. This is the kind of crack political thinking that turned Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell into GOP Senate nominees. The reality is that the debt limit will be raised one way or another.


And the only issue now is how much fiscal reform and what political fallout. So they're defending John McCain, defending Daynard, defending essentially Paul Ryan, defending McConnell, you see. Whenever the Patriots are out there trying to save the Constitution and save even our economic system. The Wall Street Journal, which pretends to be a rational voice, shoots them in the back and they're not the only ones. So they trashed the Tea Party, they trashed the Trump movement.


They trash efforts to defend the Constitution and the electoral system in these various states. And now if we lose Georgia, they will blame you and me, if we lose Georgia, it'll be because the Republicans have failed to stand up to what is taking place in this country via the Democrat Party and all these institutions that they control. I've got other information here. I also want to encourage you to back these entrepreneurs who are really trying to break these this oligopoly, in some cases monopoly when it comes to social media.


You can now find us on Rumball, obviously on parler. And we're going to continue to look for other platforms that I wish to put this program on and hopefully draw your attention and support. I don't own anything.


I'm not involved in all that. And that wouldn't be a problem even if I were. Put your money where your mouth is, Mark. I got no problem with that.


But these are excellent sites. From the Westwood One podcast network. He's here he's here now broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America, I'm Mark Levin. Our number is eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. I want to talk to you briefly.


As a proud father. This family, we have wonderful children, wonderful children, all patriots. While family oriented. All embrace faith. Yes, good kids. We have two wonderful grandchildren. And I am blessed. With this family, with my wife. My mother in law and all these children. And I've been wanting to tell you this for the longest time, so I'm going to tell you now. One of them. Has been serving. At the embassy in Israel.


For approximately a year and a half. He is brilliant. He has been doing an enormous amount of work, mostly behind the scenes. He won't get any medals. He won't get any participation certificates. His name will never be mentioned. Except by me. Name is David. And I couldn't be prouder. Of his contribution. To the successes. Between our country, the greatest country in the face of earth, Israel. And our greatest friend, the state of Israel.


He doesn't seek. Attention. He doesn't seek newspaper articles. He doesn't seek celebrity. It's very loyal. Teligent. Studious, decent, earnest young man. And I was the president of the United States himself. Who made this appointment? So I want to thank the president of the United States. And while David's been in Israel, there's been a lot of difficulty in the sense of the coronavirus and the numerous shutdowns and quarantines and. He's been far away from home.


But he's conducted himself. Like the patriotic. Young man that he is. And prior to this, he worked for the. Great senator from Texas, Ted Cruz. That shows you what a remarkable young man this is. So publicly, millions and millions of you. I want you to know about David Milstein. He has no idea I'm saying this. He may even be angry with me that I'm saying this. But nobody can do anything to me, so what?


And I know he's. He's greatly liked by so many people in this country and in the state of Israel, respecters. His integrity, that's the key word, integrity doesn't say a bad thing about another human being. Even if others do to him and about him, he's just a class act, so anyway, I tip my hat to David, I get to do that. You know, I my own radio show.


And perhaps when he comes back one day, I'll put him behind this microphone and.


You'll get to meet him yourself and he can talk about some of his experiences, those in which he's allowed to speak. So you can get to know him to. In fact, I had to do that with all the kids at some point, I try to keep our lives relatively private because. There's a lot of dangerous people out there, quite frankly. So maybe I'll make a medal or print up a certificate and hand it to myself. Anyway, I wanted to point that out now.


The Democrats in the past have objected many times to the election, quote unquote, of a Republican president in 2000, they did it in 2004, they did it to George W. Bush.


And so our friends at Rumball and I want to encourage you to join us, a rumble, what is our tagline there? Rumble, Mr. Producer. Mark Levine show at Rumball, not hard, just Mark Levin show wherever you want to go. Here's a little montage of Democrats objecting to counting Electoral College votes in 2000 and 2004. And by the way, you remember this reported on at the time. Do you remember all the hysteria at the time? Remember The Wall Street Journal and all the other kooks out there?


Where was the SAS?


Where was he running? Some university, I guess.


Count one, go the chair now hands to the tellers the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida. Mr. President, the objection is in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives, but not by a member of the Senate.


Mr. President, I stand for the purpose of objecting to the counting of the vote from the state of Florida as read.


Mr. President, arrive on rise on behalf of the Congressional Black Caucus to object to the 25 electoral votes from Florida's president. Thank you for your inquiry. It is in writing and signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count. The is the objection signed by Senator. What Mr. Chairman, Mr President, I am objecting to to the idea that votes in Florida were not counted.


The clerk will report the objection. We, a member of the House of Representatives and the United States senator, object to the counting of the electoral votes of the state of Ohio on the grounds that they were not under all of the known circumstances regularly given signed Stephanie Tubbs Jones state of Ohio, Barbara Boxer, state of California.


The objection today is raised because there are irregularities across this country with regard to voting. And we as a Congress have an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. Mr. Speaker and members, I dedicate my objection to Ohio's electoral votes to Mr. Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary 9/11. First of all, we are here because not a single election official in Ohio has given us any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularities in the state. No explanation for the machines in Mahoning County that recorded Kerry votes for Bush.


Our people are dying all over the world a lot for my state. For what reason? To bring democracy to the far corners of the world. Let's fix it here and let's do it first thing.


House Democrats. There's more, but that's enough. Ron Johnson is really a terrific senator. He's gotten better over time. I've gotten to know him a little bit.


I really respect him a lot from the state of Wisconsin, it's tough to win a statewide race in Wisconsin, but he manages to do it because I think many people in Wisconsin see that I word their integrity.


And he's been absolutely outstanding, and so for some reason, he wanted to get punished on Sunday, so he goes on the low IQ. Democrat operative Chuck Todd Show. Meet the depressed.


And of course, Chuck Todd is there not to gather information for the viewers, not to glean insight, but Chuck Todd is basically a media striptease artist.


And it's a very ugly site. And so he's going to quote Senator Ben Sasse, Senator Ben Sasse as recently reelected, so he thinks he's free to be the asshole that he is. Senator Ben Sasse, who supported the. The changing of legislation. That enabled the Iran deal, that enabled the Iran deal. Ben Sasse, who claims to be a constitutionalist when he's no such damn thing, he said, never Trumper. He should be writing for the pages of National Review of The Wall Street Journal.


Anyway, here we go, cut seven go. All right, Senator, I want to quote Senator Ben Sasse for you, because what you're alleging, why don't you quote Senator Ted Cruz farm?


Our Senator John Kennedy from. Representative Marsha Blackburn for him, and this is why Sasse does what he does, Kinzinger does what he does, Romney does what he does. Their press horse is what they are. And I'm sorry to use that word press, but I have to use it. Start from the top, please, cut seven go. All right, Senator, I want to quote Senator Ben Sasse for you, because what you're alleging is essentially you have you and your colleagues have created this controversy.


So right now, we are locked into a destructive, vicious circle in some ways, as you kind of outlined, except which is you made an allegation that there was snap.


Is this a reporter? First of all, he sounds like he's hopped up on something, but. Is this what reporters do? Of course not, because he's corrupt, NBCs corrupt, MSNBC's corrupt, Comcast is corrupt, they're the enemy, the people, because they've destroyed the First Amendment and freedom of the press.


So you have guys like this with a low IQ, with minimal experience, a very bad education, and they're up there as operatives. His wife is a Democrat operative. See this?


Why I'm hated to see you. That's why I'm hated, because I despise injustice. I'm not playing games behind this microphone.


And I call out people by their names. I just don't play games. Life is too damn short. I don't know how long I'm going to be behind this microphone by my choice. Anyway, go ahead, you have failed to offer specific evidence of that widespread fraud, but you're demanding an investigation on the grounds that there are allegations of widespread fraud. So essentially, you're the arsonist here. President Trump is the arsonist here. So you hear this.


You're the arsonist here. I would ask Chuck Todd, have you read any of the complaints with all the affidavits? I would ask Chuck Todd, you want to come on my program and debate article. To Section one clause to I'll make this challenge to Chuck Todd, because he never will do that. Five minutes, 10 minutes, one on one on Meet the Press, you and me only live no taping, no live to tape, no editing, you and me live.


What do you say, Chuck? Ten minutes on this very subject, the Constitution of the United States. And now quoting Ben Sasse, you and me, man to man. Not your little, you know, little tricks that you use, a little video and audio and look what Romney said. I don't give a crap about any of these people. Let's do it, pal. In fact, I'll do climate change with if you want. Any of these subjects?


Go ahead. Fire and now you're saying, oh, look at this, oh, my God, all these people believe what we told them because you didn't have the guts to tell the truth, that this is outrageous.


Absolutely disgusting. This is a new show, Meet the Press. It's a news show. And so what happens is the other Sunday news shows see this and they say, you know what, I have to be a bigger asshole than Chuck Todd. I got. Otherwise, we're not going to get the clicks and the ratings that we want. And besides, my corporate US media masters, they want me to do this stuff anyway. Go ahead. Check, this fire was started back in January of two thousand seventeen people like Mark Zaid in his tweet, the coup started first of many steps, rebellion and impeachment to follow.


Ultimately, this was started when the mainstream media stop drop any pretense of being unbiased and actually chose sides during this election. This fire was started when you completely ignored, for example, our investigation. Hunter Biden, no evidence of wrongdoing there. And now we find out after the election. Now, there's a fair amount of evidence to the point that we have a real FBI investigation. Sorry, I've had a lot of media bias that say that.


Senator, I have had enough of hearing this. Have you ever seen anybody talk to this one, Senator? I have had enough of hearing that. I'm Chuck Todd. And I don't want to hear you anymore. I invited you on here to be a punching bag, don't you understand? I invited you on here to humiliate you.


You're supposed to sit there, sit there and suck your thumb. You're not supposed to go through all this other stuff. Defend yourself, defend your party.


I just quoted the great Ben Sasse. Three SS. And of course, we know what is the middle word in SAS, Mr. Producer? S assess, just saying, just pointing out the obvious nonetheless. This is what you get on Meet the Press. Go ahead. Listen, I've had enough of this to the Editors Daily, just the situation where Republicans and conservatives do not trust the mainstream media. And that is. That is what is destroying the credibility of the media and our institutions and really the destruction of confidence in the institutions that result.


So I can start this.


Hmm. You spent the last two years, Senator, and I'll be right back, my love in.


By the way, you know, Stephen A. Smith and I don't talk anymore. You know that Mr.. I don't know, a couple of months ago, I wrote him, he didn't reply, I guess this election's gotten into his head. I don't know, just the Waco's.


Oh, you think it fell through the cracks? Well, life goes on, my brother. Life goes on. Let's see, where was I? Oh, yes.


Ted Cruz will be here in about an hour on the program. A great patriot. One of 2020 s most accurate pollster says election would have come out differently if not for late rule changes.


I didn't find this on The Wall Street Journal editorial page because I don't read The Wall Street Journal editorial page, Mr. Producer, every now and then point something out to me.


That's the truth. Why do I need their opinion in my own opinion? One of this year's most accurate pollsters believes the last minute changes the election laws had a significant effect on the results of the presidential election. Oh, you don't say. Quote, If this election had been run based on the rules of 2016, it would have come out differently. Robert Kahului, the chief pollster for the Trafalgar Group, remember, they got it right, told The Washington Examiner, I think those little changes made a tremendous difference.


And of course, they did. And of course, he's right.


And I assume he's been listening to me because this is a point I've been making over and over and over again. Why did the Democrats make these changes? Why did their governors, the secretaries of state, their boards of elections, their mayors and their courts, why did they do this?


Why did they do this to elect Joe Biden, that's why they did it, and now we have some Republican suckers, pseudo conservatives in the House and the Senate. Well, you know, we don't really have any kind of a role in this, you know, the voters have spoken and excuse me, these elections in these states were unconstitutional.


No, I know I'm a constitutionalist. And I had a on I spoke to James Madison and James Madison told me I'm right, so I must be right. We are going to be destroyed in this country, is going to be turned inside out by the left if this party, the Republican Party, doesn't wake the hell up. Mark, love in America is passionately, cerebrally voice talk with that voice now eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.


It's painful to watch hosts try and discuss the constitution and laws that were passed saying they were passed in 1876 when it was passed in 1887. I got it.


It's a nice try anyway, but they're trying to paint Hawley into the corner and try to make them look bad and on and on and on. And we'll try and throw them a line and invite them on the program tonight.


He hasn't been all that receptive in the past. I don't understand. I don't know. We'll see if he wants to come back. Forty nine percent of Americans say their top New Year's resolution is to save money in the next year.


Well, then let's check that box right now. When your family switches to pure talk from AT&T, Verizon or T-Mobile, which I contend are ripping you off.


You can actually save over 800 dollars a year. That's real money every single month right back in your pocket, and you don't have to sacrifice coverage you not to sacrifice anything. Talk is on the same network as one of those other big carriers, but they charge you half. That's right, no gimmicks, no fluff added to your bills. Why is pure talk? Rising so fast in terms of customer support. Pure Torque is the top rated wireless company by consumer affairs.


So right now, get unlimited talk, text and two gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't care, they don't charge you for it. So grab your mobile phone, dial pound to 50 and say, Mark Levin, you've heard me say this before, it's a new year. It's a perfect time to get this right. Don't burn your money, dial pound two five zero and say, Mark Levin and by the way, in addition to what I've just told you, you'll say 50 percent off your first month, 50 percent off your first month.


So that's down to five zero, say, keyword Mark Levin.


I wish pure talk were making computers because I'd buy a new computer in two seconds, Mr. Producer, because this damn thing is well, it's not doing what it's supposed to do. By the way, pure talk is simply smarter wireless, which is why I encourage you to check it out. Simply smarter wireless now, Joe Biden. He's got his inauguration figured out already. And let me tell you. This is in that PJ Media, Stacey Lennix, for a candidate who encouraged Americans to embrace hope, not fear, during his nomination acceptance speech.


Joe Biden is making our choice for the eve of the inauguration, according to Axios, to set the tone for his inauguration the next day. President elect Biden will lead a memorial to remember and honor lives lost in covid-19, with church bells ringing and light shows across the country on Tuesday, January 19, 530 p.m..


Do you want to know why Joe Biden's not having a normal inauguration, you know, or massive crowds gather and you give a speech an.


On the backside of the Capitol building and people lined the roads, there's two main reasons. You know why, Mr. Producer? There won't be that many people showing up and lining the roads for Joe Biden. I got 80 million votes, but nobody ever shows up to listen to. Does site makes sense, of course it doesn't, but he's afraid he won't get an audience. That's number one.


You want to know the other reason he doesn't have the energy. There's no way he can walk from Capitol Hill to the White House without walking into a telephone pole or something like that. So then they they come up with this, there's stuff about, well, we're going to do it virally and we're going to honor the people who passed.


From one of your honor, the people. Who passed from heart attacks? Or even better yet, in addition to the people who've died from covid, why don't you honor the people? Who've died as a result of the Falchi shutdowns? Who've died in our nursing homes and our senior citizen facilities. It's a result of the. Cuomo decisions and the Murphy decisions and the Wittmer decisions of the Pritzker decisions and the newsroom decisions, why don't you do that, genius?


Now, they're not going to do that because that exposes them for the buffoons that they actually are.


I wanted to get to this Paul Ryan. We haven't heard from Paul Ryan in a while, have we, Mr. Producer?


We never hear from Paul, but we hear from them now. Because he's attacking conservatives, good old Paul Ryan. This is in Business Insider Dotcom. Is it that a left wing rag? I think it is, but if it's not, I apologize. If it is, they can screw off. Nonetheless.


Former House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican who represented Wisconsin in Congress from 1999 to 2019, spoke out Sunday against members of his party or planning to object to congressional certification of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. But a dozen Republican senators said they plan to reject the certification. Some other Republicans holding Governor Larry Hogan of Maryland, Senators Susan Collins and Mitt Romney have spoken out against the lawmaker's plan.


Paul Ryan, former speaker. All our basic rights and freedoms flow from a fidelity to the constitution of the rule of law. It's interesting how he's lecturing us. Why isn't he lecturing the Democrats in the media? And he says the principle is not only fundamentally American. But a central tenet of conservatism under our system, voters determine the president and his self governance cannot sustain itself at the whims of Congress and place the will of the people. I urge members to consider the precedent that it would set.


Well, here's the precedent it would set. We have had a complete breakdown of our system, we are in the middle of a constitutional crisis and not because of what Charlie's doing or Ted Cruz or Jim Jordan in the guise. But in spite of them. We had a direct attack on our electoral system. In a number of battleground states specifically targeted. By the Biden campaign, the Democrat Party and their surrogates on the left. And they succeeded. We had a breakdown of judicial review where the media seems to think that the failure of the Supreme Court is doing its job as evidence.


That Donald Trump or others should not be bringing cases. Because that's the way the media are there, perverse and their corrupt. But the Supreme Court failed to do its job. It failed to uphold. The election provision of the federal constitution, it failed to protect the state legislatures from rogue governors, rogue secretaries of state, rogue mayors, rogue boards of election and rogue state and federal courts in some cases.


Failed miserably. Thanks to John Roberts and some others. So what would Paul Ryan have us do? Nothing. Paul Ryan would have us watch. As the republic collapses. He attacked the Tea Party. He despised Trump and his movement. He was absolutely silent when the Democrats were usurping the electoral process in 2016 and throughout the Trump presidency. He didn't say a word, nothing. Nothing about absolutely unimaginable lawlessness by the FBI and the intelligence agencies, nothing about the outrageous, specious.


Impeachment of our president, nothing about the attempt to criminalize the election. With a special counsel, Paul Ryan didn't say a damn thing, but now he's worried about protecting the republic. Because Republicans dare to raise their voices about what took place before, during and after Election Day. Where is the evidence, they say? I gave you the evidence. And what these states did. To eviscerate the key provision of the United States Constitution and what Paul Ryan telling you and Ben Sasse and Adam Kinzinger and all the rest of them are telling you.


Is that Congress has an absolute affirmative obligation. To consent to the unconstitutional conduct that took place in these states. Their reading of the United States Constitution is so perverse and irrational. That they would have you believe that these geniuses. These geniuses would tell Congress, yes. Yes, count the electors from states that violated the Constitution because you have no power to do anything else, which means that they are contributing to the violations of the Constitution by the states.


And yet they took an oath. To faithfully execute our laws and to uphold the Constitution. And so they are now going to contribute to its demise. And then they go into the what ifs. Congress doesn't have the power to do this, who says? Well, according to press and I had a discussion with one of the senators, I don't call them, who called me one of the smart ones. I said, where does the Constitution say that says shall count?


But it doesn't say shall count unconstitutional lectors. The presumption is that they followed the Constitution. I'll give you a perfect example. One. Let's pick one of the liberal states, what if the state of New York passed a law? And said electors cannot be black. What if they passed a law, I'm just giving you an example what law school's about and says electors cannot be black.


Or electors cannot be Republican. And those electors are certified. Throw a one party state. The numbers are sent to the archivist of the United States who holds onto them and then come January six, they send them to Congress.


You have to count them, says Tom McClintock, we can't do anything else. Well, they violated the 1965 Civil Rights Act, you can't it doesn't matter, you have to count them. It says shall count, shall count. I would say to my friend Brett Barry just listening to him. Right, says Chowhound, you have to count them. Well, we'll let you have a statute that says you can't do that oh, really? Well, we have a constitution that says.


That what took place in these four states cannot take place in these four states. That the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, that the secretary of state of Wisconsin, that the secretary of state of Michigan, that the secretary of state of Georgia, among others, they don't have the power. To influence the choosing of electors. In defiance of state law passed by the legislature. You have to use rationality. When you're reading the Constitution, you read the text and you apply what what's an originalist?


You apply the meaning and the intention at the time it was written.


So clearly, the meaning and the intention at the time that provisions written in the time the 12th Amendment is written and adopted and ratified is that there's going to be a lawful election.


The consequences of which the electors will be counted by the Congress. Why do these stupid arguments come out of the mouth of funny journalists, pseudo conservatives, among others? And I'll tell you why. Some of them are scared to death. Of enforcing the United States Constitution when push comes to shove. They are threatened by the mob. It's much easier. To me, it's much easier to trash trash Holly, it's much easier to trash Ted Cruz or anybody who has the guts to stand up and say, wait a minute, Mom.


Wait a minute, Mobb. That's not the way this system is supposed to work, then we get the pseudo constitutionalist. He constitution, it says, shout, shout, shout, shout, shout, shout, shout, count, unconstitutional votes. Well, what kind of precedent will this serve that means Congress can interfere all the time, any time they'll have de novo review, broad review.


That's not what's being said. You can have any damn kind of election you want, the state legislature says that's the way it's supposed to work, pretty much not exclusively, but pretty much. But that's not what happened in these states. The opposite happened in these states. I'll be right back. Much love in. And. So here's Biden, two thousand dollar checks coming if the Democrats win Georgia now they're worried about this tape, this illegally taped and release phone call with the president of United States.


And the secretary of state says he had nothing to do it. He's a liar, obviously had something to do with it.


But bribing voters in Georgia is OK, you know, you elect these two Democrats to the Senate, I guarantee, and I'll be president, we'll get to that 2000 dollars. 2000 miles, how about twenty five hundred twenty three thousand three? How about thirty two hundred thirty thirty five hundred thirty five? Anybody want thirty five hundred. That's what he's about. Almost 400 million dollars in dark money came at his campaign. How many stories have you seen on that dark money means the source has not revealed.


It's not transparent. Didn't even come from China. Nobody cares. I'm the only one who gives a crap about it. It's amazing and I love this quote. No, Trump, Trump, Trump. Unbelievable. They're already talking about Kamala Harris taking over for Biden. We have been scammed like we've never been scammed before. We don't need to read rags like The Wall Street Journal. We don't need to hear phonies like Ben Sasse and Adam Kinzinger. We know what the hell's going on in this country.


We know what the Democrat Party wants to do to us, we know that the Republican Party without Trump is impotent. And hates us. They want our votes, they don't want our input. But I'll tell you what, there is there is a great institution out there, it's called Hillsdale College.


Now, I know you love freedom because you listen to this show, my show, everything I do is all about preserving freedom and a government that secures it for us.


It's the same with Hillsdale College, I talk about them all the time because Hillsdale is committed to pursuing truth and defending liberty. Hillsdale teaches students to defend freedom no matter their major, Hillsdale teaches them how to defend liberty. Now, they do that for you to through their free monthly digest of constitutional thought, called in Primus five point six million Americans receive from Prima's for free every month. And you should be reading it to. You can subscribe for free at Lhevinne, for Hillsdale Dotcom, Levien for Hillsdale Dotcom.


No strings attached. Generous donors who want to preserve freedom for future generations make it possible for Hillsdale to send a promise to you for no cost every month. Start receiving and reading and Prima's so you can know how to defend the freedom you love. Visit Levin for Hillsdale Dotcom. That's elevon for Hillsdale Dotcom.


Lhevinne for Hillsdale Dotcom.


In our next hour, you're not going to want to miss it. We have the great senator from Texas. No, not Cornyn, for God sakes, Ted Cruz.


We're going to take some of your calls and of course, me. We'll be right back. From the Westwood One podcast network. Ladies and gentlemen, this final hour of the podcast is sponsored exclusively by AMAY, the Association of Mature American Citizens. Now over two million conservative members Strong EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we care about faith, family and freedom. Thank you for listening and please support Amen. And you can become a member at Armacost U.S. Join us here.


Now, broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark. Hello, America. Mark Levin, our number eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. Anthony Fauci is one of the most political public figures in the science field in our bureaucracy.


And he should have been retired a long time ago. Anthony Fouche on Meet the Press. K-12 go. Are we looking at a campaign when President elect Biden becomes president? Are we going to need to do another 15 to 30 days? Stop the spread? Maybe do a partial lockdown between that issue and obviously what's happening now? And it looks like hospitals, they were overwhelmed in November. Dr. Fauci, what's going to happen at the end of January?


Let's stop a second. So understand when there's a lockdown that Falchi and Todora utterly unaffected. They continue to work. They continue to get paid. They continue to roam the streets.


So this is something that will not affect him, we have a new thing going on in this country. We have scientific fascists. Who give just enough information. To the. To the media and the political fascists. To do severe damage to the country. No, I'm not saying forces of fascism saying it's a mindset, it's a mindset. Go ahead. Yeah, well, I hope we don't have to do the lockdown because we all know, Chuck, how much covid-19 fatigue there is of people just really being worn down.


Oh, no, you don't, because you've never been worn down and neither has Todd. And none of you have had any economic impact affecting you or your families.


This guy is an infectious disease guy. That's all he is. That's his lane. Who can play sports, who can attend funerals, who can get married, what businesses are to be open or none of his damn business but the media know they have in him a foil will advance their cause and what is their cause? Their cause is a fascistic mindset, that's their cause. When's the last time any of these people ever talked about individual liberty? Never private property rights with a business never, and yet that's what this nation was founded on, read the Declaration of Independence.


Go ahead. But we certainly need to enhance and make more uniform our public health. All right, I'll say it. Shut up, you idiot, you quack. I'm sick and tired of you. I'm sick and tired of you going on and on, like you're Confucius, like you're some kind of wise man, you're nothing. What did he say? Media Matters media. You better get to work. That's right. I said it. I'm sick of this jerk.


He thinks. He thinks that Cuomo did a good job. Any so-called scientists or medical professional who thinks Cuomo did a good job should turn in his damn license. I've got more hear from him, I don't I don't want to hear from him anymore, but I'd rather hear from me, you know what I mean, Mr. Producer? Did you watch Life, Liberty and Lytvyn last night? I hope so. The opening monologue. I came in and I did that fresh and we had a wonderful program with some of my.


My best shows. And I hope you watch the night before that, Walter Williams, but anyway, from last night, cut 14 go, our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are being destroyed by the Democrat Party and the media, and they want to destroy what's left of it.


We know this because the Democrats have announced their intentions. The two neo Marxist Democrats running in Georgia are elected to the Senate. It'll be 50 50 and then the neo Marxists, they hope. Purported vice president of the United States, Kamala Harris, is not there yet, but they hope she'll be the 41st vote for the Democrats. So by the slimmest of margins. They're going to destroy our judiciary. They're going to destroy separation of powers, they're going to destroy the United States Senate by packing the United States Senate.


We're going to have a rogue legislature that will pass whatever it wants, any time it wants, and fundamentally alter every aspect of this society. And then finally, they want to destroy the Electoral College so Republicans can never win. And Republican areas of this country have lost, in effect, their franchise and their representation. That's how serious this is. We're standing at the precipice and we're looking into the abyss because this is the target. This is the target.


The Democrat Party never much like the founding of this country. It never much like the Declaration of Independence and certainly not the Constitution. Early on in our history, it sought to destroy the Constitution. That's what the Confederacy was all about, slavery, nullification, segregation. And they carry that through well into the nineteen hundreds. And now it's the party of the neo Marxist. They have never liked Americanism. They've never liked the founding. They've never liked the limits placed on them by the United States Constitution if we don't win at least one seat.


But both seats in the state of Georgia, which is supposed to be a Republican state, this country will be changed forever if we don't fight on January 6th on the floor of the Senate and the House. That is the joint meeting of Congress on these electors. We're done. And I want to explain this very, very clearly. We have Republican members of Congress who are going on CNN and MSNBC and anywhere else they can be heard saying this is an attack at the heart of democracy.


Ben Sasse, Adam Kinzinger, others who should know better, Cornyn, Thune, McConnell.


And there's more. And of course, the media promote them. The media say, look at this, look at this. They're trying to reverse the course of the election. They're trying to take the franchise away from the people. Let me be abundantly clear about this. I wrote a piece about this the other day. You may want to check it out. On January six, we learned whether our Constitution will hold and whether the Republicans care. Let me be clear.


Article two, Section one, clause two of the United States Constitution. All right. I won't repeat it. We've done that before.


But people who are now going to vote to just allow these electors go through are people who are well aware that our Constitution has been violated, but they've come up with one excuse after another to do it anyway. And we will keep an eye out. We'll be right back.


Love in. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond. Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more.


And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's a m a c dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for. Join amoc instead a c us.


Well, welcome, Senator Ted Cruz. How are you, sir? Mark, good evening. I'm doing well, but still doing great.


I want to ask a couple questions here.


Sure. First of all, you're constitutionalist. You have this Texas case that's brought it's brought to the Supreme Court. And there's a provision in our Constitution that says that, you know, when a state is suing a state, the Supreme Court, quote, shall unquote have original jurisdiction.


Isn't that correct? You are correct. And so shall was read out of the. Constitution there that we have a provision in our Constitution. With the word shall shows up against that, that the Congress shall count the electoral votes and now. It's like the holy grail, that is Congress is supposed to go through a ministerial task and count. And count elector's, even if members of Congress know full well that in some states the elections were unconstitutional because Article two, where the Republican legislatures were were intentionally was intentionally circumvented by a state supreme court or state secretary of state.


And so it's funny how these words change, isn't it?


Well, there are lots of people playing games. So this is obviously a politically divided moment. And and you're seeing a lot of Democrats, a lot of folks in the media are screaming, how dare anyone want to examine claims of voter fraud? That that if you want to do so, you somehow want to destroy the pillars of democracy. And that is the view that is neither consistent with the Constitution nor is it consistent with history. And in fact, I think Congress has an obligation to act to defend the integrity of our elections.


As you note, the Constitution and Twelfth Amendment in particular gives the responsibility of counting the votes to the Congress, to both sessions, both houses and joint session presided over by the vice president of the United States. And that responsibility, the framers of the Constitution, knew what they were doing when they gave responsibilities to an unelected branch like the Congress. They don't give ministerial responsibilities. They could have just given it to a local clerk in D.C. if it simply involved handing a piece of paper over.


It doesn't. It involves judgments about what votes are legal or permissible or consistent with the law and what votes are not. And it's always involve judgments. And by the way, the Democrats know this because four times in recent years they have objected to the counting of electors. They did it in 1969. They did it in 2001. They did in 2005. They did it in 2016. So the Democrats know full well that is the case. And none of those instances when it was Democrats objecting, did the press light their hair on fire and run around saying it's a coup, it's a coup.


Democracy is dying. It is all absurd. It is all driven by the fact that the press and the Democrats hate Donald Trump. My view is Congress should fulfill our responsibility under the Constitution to consider serious claims of voter fraud. And that's why I assembled a coalition of 11 senators that we are going to vote to object to the electors, not to set aside the election. I don't think that would actually be the right thing to do, but rather to press for the appointment of an electoral commission that can hear the claims of voter fraud, hear the evidence and make a determination as to what the facts are and the extent to which the law was complied with.


I want to get back to shall count. You would assume that those who wrote the 10th Amendment, 12th Amendment, those who wrote the Constitution generally, that they would assume that the electors come to them, the electors votes come to them based on a constitutional lawful process.


Correct. Yes and no, that's certainly helped supposed to operate, but but they were also the framers were wise as to the way of politics. They were.


Let me let me let me restate this, because let me let me restate this. What I'm trying to say is this. I heard one of our friends on radio today say, you shall count. You have no option. It says ciao. And I'm thinking, now, wait a minute. You're telling me that that the men who wrote this language said even if something comes to you and you know it's unconstitutionally generated, you have to vote for it.


Don't you take an oath of office to that says, I uphold the Constitution of the United States. How can you vote for that if you know if you know that that elector came to you unconstitutionally?


Go ahead. Well, the framers knew there would be disputes, this was easy to anticipate, and so they assigned the responsibility to an elected body that had democratic legitimacy. That's not why it's not some federal district judge in the District of Columbia who receives the votes. That's why it's not the archives of the United States who counts the votes. It is the elected Congress because they knew that these issues would be disputed. In 1800, there was a closely contested, disputed election.


And and in trying to determine the right approach to take here, Mark, this is something that I took very seriously. You and I both revere the Constitution. It matters deeply that we follow it and act consistent with the rule of law. And I have to admit, as we were heading into Wednesday with objections, I viewed it as two choices that were being presented to senators, both of which were lousy choices. One choice was vote against the objections to electors.


And the reason that's a lousy choices that would be seen by a great many people understood as saying you don't believe voter fraud is significant, you don't believe it occurs. And that's simply not reality. And it's not where a great many members of the Senate are in terms of their beliefs. But the other side, I think all of us are rightly concerned that. But you don't want to set aside the results of an election just because the candidate you happened to back didn't prevail.


That's that's not a good standard or precedent either. And so what I did is I tried to study, well, what has happened in the last 230 years of our nation's history. And I think the most compelling precedent is the presidential election of 1876. That was an election between Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel Tilden. It's a very close election. And there were three states in that election, Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina, where there were very serious allegations of voter fraud.


Now, what had Congress do in 1877? It didn't throw its hands up in the air and say, we can't decide anything. We have no no ability. Our hands are tied. Now, Congress did something very different. It appointed what it called an electoral commission that consisted of five members of the House, five members of the Senate and five Supreme Court justices. And that commission was charged with hearing the evidence and making a determination about the disputed ballots.


That's what happened in 1877. And what I did on looking to that precedent, I think that's the most apt precedent, is I reached out to a number of my colleagues and assembled a coalition of 11 senators. I convinced 10 other senators to join me in saying we should follow the precedent of 1877. We should object to the electors and use that to press for appointing an electoral commission. So these claims can be reviewed by a forum that has credibility, that is impartial and that can assess them on the merits.


I think that is a very reasonable position and it is one that derives from the constitution, from federal statute and from centuries of precedents.


And yet as I watch this. You have a large number of Republican senators who just wash their hands of this and some of them are attacking and some of them are said to be conservatives. How do you explain this?


Well, I think there are a variety of views. I do think there are some some conservatives who in good conscience believe that that that Congress's discretion is limited. And I've had some conversations with with senators and House members who are kind of dog is that is the little white furball, a mutt named Snowflake. That's who was running and barking at the door right now. And I'm sorry, I'm a dog lover. Anyway, go ahead.


You know, I think there are conservatives in both houses who genuinely believe that. And I don't fault them for coming to that determination. I think there are also some Republicans in both houses who are not conservatives, but who are piously and self righteously preening, who are moralizing that anyone who believes that when the framers gave Congress the authority to supervise the counting of the votes that they meant for the Congress to actually use that authority to vindicate the Constitution, that we see some some Republicans, all of the media and all of the Democrats, but sadly, some Republicans who are huffing and puffing and suggesting, how dare you have that interpretation?


And to be honest, Mark, what I'm urging people on all sides to do is just calm down, count to 10. We have a responsibility. And I only count to five, by the way.


And our country is so divided when there is so much acrimony.


I actually think elected officials have a responsibility to be calm and sober and to follow the law. And that's what I'm trying to do and that's what I'm urging all of my colleagues to do.


The Democrats are all going to vote against all of this. Yeah. Do you think you'll get more than 10 to support you? I'm just curious.


So I'm confident we'll get 12 there. There a total of 11 who were with me. And then Josh Haley also said he would object. So we will get those 12. I think we'll get more than that. I don't think right now it would take something truly extraordinary to get a majority in both houses, which which is what we need. And one of the things that's important for your listeners to understand, there are a lot of good people across the country who have been led to believe if only one House member and one senator objects, then suddenly the election results are set aside.


You and I both know that's not the case. That's the only way to do that is if you have a majority in the House and a majority in the Senate.


Ted Cruz, thank you, my friend, and thank you for taking up this battle as well. Take care of yourself. We'll be right back. AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong and I'm one of them a who believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservatives care about more than talk. AMOC fights a full time presence in Washington. AMOC pushes back against reckless spending disasters like Medicare for all and the expanding reach of the federal government and beyond.


Advocacy. Joining a map gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special member only, rates on car insurance, travel discounts, cell phone plans and a hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax bi monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an EMAC member and you should be to join today at Amoco's. That's A.M. Dot us stop supporting the liberal agenda that the other 50 plus organization has been pushing for.


Join amoc instead. A m a c us.


Mark Levin, an unapologetic patriot and unapologetic constitutionalist, you can reach him at eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one.


Before we go to some calls, I don't sometimes I wonder, do we really have to urge our fellow citizens to help us save this country? I want all of you live in ice in Georgia. Just just listen to me a second. The vast majority of you have voted or are voting. I know this.


But some of you are not for one peculiar reason or another. The rest of us who don't live in Georgia, we don't get to vote. On the future of our country, based on these two seats in the United States Senate, we don't get to vote. You have to vote for us. You have to vote for our children, our grandchildren and generations to come. You have to decide. God forbid, if Biden's president. And Pelosi, who won the speakership by like, what, three votes?


If Chuck Schumer is going to run the United States Senate, even though it'll be a 50/50 split, Kamala Harris will be the the vote break their.


So if they get what they want, it's an if. They'll control the House of Representatives by about 10 votes. They'll control the Senate by a vice president who's president of the Senate, a tie breaker. They intend to change the country as a result of this, they have no mandate. And yes, they stole the election. This should make you angry. In Georgia. Not passive, not reticent. This should make you angry and you should get on the phone and say, not only am I going to vote, dammit, I'm going to make sure 10 people I know are going to vote.


We're going to overcome this fraud in this state, we're going to overcome these idiots who run our state. And we're going to teach the media and the left a lesson. That I'm a proud citizen of Georgia will never accept representation by an anti-Semite, anti-American, race baiting. Raphael Warnock. Are buying anti-American, neo Marxist, Chinese, appeasing Hassan. Can you imagine the great state of Georgia sending these two reprobates to represent them and they vote on national issues to destroy this country and Joe Biden was there today.


Urging his fellow Democrats to vote for an anti-Semite and a neo Marxist. No stories in the papers about that. No, no, no, no, no. No stories about that, no stories about Hunter Biden. No stories about any of it. Because our media is poison. Poison. So don't be dispirited in Georgia. Now's the time to stand up the Revolutionary War went on for eight and a half years, World War Two went on for four and a half years.


We're not asking you to take up arms, we're not asking you to go to war, we're asking you to vote. And if everybody who can hear me votes, we win. No matter what they try to do. We win. I would vote for an orange juice can over either of those two Democrats. I would, Mr. Producer. And that's the way it is, in other words, tomorrow's the day and. I can only urge you so many times in so many ways, so we'll see what happens and hopefully.


Hopefully you'll save what's left of the republic and then we can push back and fight back. Let's go to Ravi. And California on the Mark Levin at Rovi, how are you? Good, how are you, Mark? All right. Thank you so much for taking my call. Thank you. And I want to thank you very much also for putting so much focus on the absolute necessity to vote in the Georgia runoff elections tomorrow. I read an article about this in American Thinker.


But just in a nutshell, you covered pretty much all the bases, except that I mean, he covered all the bases. It's very important that six percent, according to a survey USA poll, showed six percent of conservatives plan on not voting in Georgia versus like two percent of liberals. And the most recent poll from Fox News shows a complete tie between both Senate races.


So that means that if there's even a small percentage of conservatives have to assume we're behind, always assume we're behind and get out there and beat their, you know, beat them. Go ahead. Yeah, exactly, and we need all conservatives, like you were saying, to go out and vote and you listed the reasons because, you know, if the Democrats take over this country, as Reagan warned in 1964 and in 1967, if we lose this constitutional republic to socialism, you know, it'll be very hard to get to get it back.


Now, we won't get it at all. We won't get it back. It'll be gone. And that's why people should not focus on how conservative these two candidates are there. I don't think they are. I don't think they are. I think people are upset that last time their vote didn't count. And so the same systems in place. And what I'm saying is get out there and vote. Let the chips fall where they may. But we've got to fight them.


All right, my friend, I appreciate your call. All right.


Let me see here. I'm looking up my call screen. Mr. Producer, who do we have there?


Kate in Georgia, XM Satellite go. Yes, I want to let everybody know that we Georgian's and Mark, I'm overjoyed to speak with you, sir. You're a great patriot, a great American. I thank you so much for your intellect and your insight. But I want to let everyone know out there in the United States that Georgians realize what's at stake tomorrow. I personally have already voted. I voted red. I am happy to represent and stand with all of my fellow American brothers and sisters and this ridiculousness called socialism and radical left.


And let me tell you something, my friend.


God forbid, if we lose these so-called phony conservative media outlets are prepared to blame Donald Trump, and if we win, they will never thank Donald Trump.


This is the way it works for Donald Trump, isn't it? Well, we shouldn't be in this position overall, producer. I don't feel I should be going into a runoff. Yes, this election was stolen. I think I'm twenty 20 two. Roethlisberger and Kemp are going to be stealing that. There's a lot of very angry people here and they know what they have to do. They have to get out and vote. And on Facebook, all the different other social media outlets, people of Georgia know exactly what's at stake.


I don't believe the polls, but at the same time, I don't want to deter anyone from going out and do your your civic duty and uphold all the polls, show it's neck and neck.


And I suspect it is. And it could be, but they haven't hit them again. They haven't changed anything from November 3rd. There's been no changes in how they're conducting themselves. And thank goodness there's eighteen hundred poll watchers, you know, that that decided to sign up for tomorrow. And, you know, we just we all have to have to bring telescopes with them.


Hey, you never know what these courts are going to do. All right, my friend, I appreciate you.


Appreciate your call very, very much. Let's see here, how about Craig in Pennsylvania, Mark Levin, NAPCO. Yeah, hey, thanks for taking my call there, Mark. You got it. I didn't catch the beginning of your interview with Senator Cruz there and maybe you guys discussed this, but I was curious, couldn't they use the one congressman, one senator deal to spark so much debate that they could they could give evidence during that debate?


No debate is lineout. As a matter of statute, it's limited. Debate is limited under the under the 1887 statute. Hello. I was just thinking, if they would if they would have debate, they could get enough, at least some evidence to maybe.


I think that's what they're planning on doing. Some of them are planning on getting evidence out. But as I say, there is there is a limitation.


All right, my friend, thank you for your call. We'll be right back. Much love in.


AMEC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is one of the fastest growing organizations in America now, over two million conservative members strong, and I'm one of them EMAC believes in and stands up for the values that we constitutional conservative carried on our mind makework AMOC fights, a full time presence in Washington, pushes back against reckless spending, know disastrously down there for all.


And they expanded the fight over the government and beyond advocacy. Joining gay marriage gives you access to a wealth of benefits and discounts, including special memory only race car insurance. David Reno, Nevada, phone plan. How are you today? Hell of a lot more. And if that's not enough, you'll get Amax by monthly magazine full of insightful articles on issues that matter to most of us. We conservatives, as I said, I'm an elected member and you should be to join today to broad and support him.


There's a certain on a U.S. Navy cable channel case there's 50 plus PR. So that's evidence. There was absolutely no where instead a m a C, no problem whatsoever.


The first election in American history where there's never been any fraud, even though Democrat controlled state after Democrat controlled state got rid of the the protections of the voting system, even though we had a zillion mail in votes, there's been no evidence of any fraud. Now, I know that because I hear the media repeating it. So that's got to be true.


Then I guess I have a second question for you. How come we're not prosecuting these folks that are saying these affidavits under perjury?


Good point, isn't it? But I know it was worth hearing. It's a great point. And look, we live in two different worlds around here, one, the media world.


And it is a very sick, dark and and deceitful world. And one is our own world.


And in their world has has the upper hand right now. All right, my friend, thank you for your call. Lou, Ocala, Florida, the Great W, Esquire, why go, Hey, Mark, happy New Year from your favorite state. Thank you. Thank you. Real quick. I know I know you're running up on me. I just want you to know that I think that in Georgia, they need to hold an immediate forensic analysis of these machines.


You must be a kook. You see, the Democrats used to raise this all the time up until October. The media raised it all the time, including the Pubic Broadcasting System, the Nauseous Broadcasting System, a.k.a. NBC, the Canadian broadcast networks, other networks raised it. Democrats in Congress wrote letters raising it, and now you're not allowed to raise it. So you must be a kook.


Yeah, well, here's the deal. Here's the deal. You know that guy that sent his team of hackers into Georgia and they're in those machines live now and they are connected to the Internet. They can be manipulated by the Internet and they can be manipulated. I mean.


No, no, no, no, no, no, no. That was before October. But Biden won. Biden won, none of that matters anymore. Is that a matter for the U.S. to your seat? Yeah, we'll see how that goes. And people like The Wall Street Journal gives at the back of their hand a lot like what you're doing. Look what you're doing to democracy. Shut the hell up. Look what you fools are doing.


It's all right, my friend. Thank you. The we the people who make this country work not allowed to speak out, not on the question. What's obvious? Cat five moron's Nertz. Why are the editorial board of the of a Wall Street Journal over here? All right. Let's go to Jerry Passaic, New Jersey, the great WIBC Jerry. Go right ahead. You know, it's a shame that we couldn't make out a lot of these Bush and Bush and Mukono Republicans, that we couldn't beat them with more conservative ones because like Trump, save the party.


And yet you have these people like SAC's and Romney and the other characters basically pulling all this nonsense.


If it wasn't for him, if it wasn't for Trump, we wouldn't even be close in the Senate or the House right now. Let's be honest. And furthermore, McConnell was hurting and it was Trump who twice went down there and campaigned for McConnell. McConnell wins by like 18 or 20 points. And McConnell thinks it was him, that it was his great charisma and beautiful silhouette.


Ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba ba. Hey, I'm voting for him. All right, thank you for your call. All these people think they won because they're so great now, that's not why they won. And again, as I said at the beginning of this program three hours ago. They needed the Tea Party to deliver them like 66 votes in the House, several votes in the Senate, and what did they do to trash the Tea Party?


Wall Street Journal trashed the Tea Party donor, trashed the Tea Party. Paul Ryan trashed the Tea Party. McConnell's been around. Forever trash the Tea Party, they got what they wanted. King comes out of the Tea Party within 12 months, turns on the Tea Party. Same thing with Trump. Trump sweeps people into election in 2016. He just swamp a whole bunch of them into an office this time. OK, great, let's move on, we need another Bush, is there another Bush around here?


Romney have kids, always got five boys. Let's run one of them. Reminds me of Bush, what was it, forty one after Ronald Reagan's two massive landslides and then he wins, what is Reagan's third term? Kinder, gentler, kinder, gentler.


We salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters and emergency personnel. Georgia, let's do it, baby, and I'll see you all tomorrow. God bless. From the Westwood One podcast network.