Editor's Note: This transcript was automatically transcribed, so mistakes are inevitable. You can contribute by proofreading the transcript or highlighting the mistakes. Sign up to be amongst the first contributors.
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts with your host, Dan Bongino.
So they're really doubling down on trying to hide Joe Biden. They're not just sticking him in the basement now. I think they want to stick them in like a cave underneath the basement, behind a locked door with like Balts and deadbolts to make sure he can't get out. The evidence is growing every day. The media is in a panic here, which you would think the disinterested media would be interested in getting more information vis a vis the debate right now, I don't know.
That's what actual media people do. I got that. I've got an interesting behind the scenes kind of take from some of my police officer friends about what's really going on on the streets in New York and why there's been this explosion in shootings. Interesting. I think you're going to enjoy that one or not enjoy that one, if you know what I mean. If the information is really terrible and I want this this argument breaking out over where the Steele dossier came from, I think it's misguided.
I want to show you something interesting I talked about a long time ago that went viral, a speech I made. And this is going to be interesting. Don't go anywhere. The movie script, some of you are like I remember the movie script. I know Joe does, but we'll get them. They show you express VPN, go get yourself a VPN today and protect your online data from prying eyes. Where do you get it? Go to express VPN dot com slash Bunshiro.
Don't wait. Welcome to the Dan Bongino show producer. Joe, how are you today?
Well, as usual, I'm doing very well in the middle of a huge rainstorm here.
And I know if we lose Joe during the show, Joe is going through a monsoon up there in Maryland. We will we'll just pretend that he's there. Well, then he'll do a grunt for her. He goes, Joe grunting I don't know what's going on over here. So if you're a grunt, it doesn't sound like Joe. It probably isn't. It's probably doing a fair job. All right. Let's get right to it. Got a loaded show at The Today Show.
A bunch of our friends had cryo freeze CBD, Almagro Freeze CBD, Lessa Living life in pain is the worst. Believe me. I know it's more than feeling discomfort can affect your mood, your sleep, your energy levels. You just feel terrible. I have arthritis. It's really bad. Prevents me from sleeping a lot and it's just really kind of driving me crazy, to be honest with you. It prevents me from exercising too, sometimes in the way I want to, whether it's arthritis, foot pain or aching joints, I can do it.
It's no secret that I'm a huge fan of cryo free CBD on developed Biomax. How we use it all the time. We go to bottles of it here. My wife loves it. My mother in law uses it. We use it. I use it on my shoulder, especially after a tough workout. Now, you're going to want to listen up because, oh, Max just released a new cryo freeze foot relieve spray. There it is right there.
And this product is going to blow your mind. It's ideal for reviving tired feet and legs after physical training, a really bad day at work or a long day on the golf course. This foot spray incorporates hemp, the right CBD, and it is botanicals such as peppermint, rosemary, tea tree and aloe that cools quickly, rejuvenate quickly and revives those hot and inflamed legs and feet. There's zero THC and no high. If you've been anxious to try Omak cryo freeze but haven't yet try it, we swear by it.
In this household, this stuff really works. Now's the time. Oh, Max is offering my listeners an exclusive twenty percent off discount on their cryo free CBD Ultimate Recovery Bundle, the security collection. My personal favorites, including the CBD pain relief role on the sports recovery cream, the rapid relief CBD drops and the new foot relieve spray. Check it out. Just go to Omak Dotcom Dan today to get twenty percent off this exclusive bundle. It's only available for my Lister's.
That's Omak Health Dotcom. Dan get twenty percent off the crime free CBT Ultimate Recovery Bundle. You don't want to miss this opportunity to try all of my favorite cryo forest products again. Oh, Max Health dot slash Danco today. Check it out. All right. So let's go. Ding, ding. So just quickly to follow up on a story we did yesterday before I get into meat and potatoes of the show, ladies and gentlemen, again, my sources are spot on.
I have never let you down on sources. Whether it was Spygate or the Clinton Eppstein debacle. The sources have been solid. Their information has been vigorous, robust, tested and proven time and time again to be legit. My sources are telling me Joe Biden is losing it. I said that yesterday, the show performed exceptionally well because I titled it What You Really Need to know about Joe Biden. Folks, I can't tell you who to vote for.
It's a secret ballot in a free society. Thank the Lord. And I'm not using his name in vain for that.
Thank the Lord, a free society. I'm just telling you, if you're casting your vote for Joe Biden, you're about to vote for a man who is losing his attachment to reality by the moment. I'm not kidding. I say that with no ill will. I say that with no celebratory tone that would be sick and deranged. I say that because. People sources are telling me he's not there, he's not there, and it's getting worse on an increasingly it's not reaching an asymptote.
It's getting worse fast. He's not attached to reality. Here's what's worse about this story, like it gets worse, it always gets worse. What's worse about this story, ladies and gentlemen, is the media knows this and absolutely refuses to report on it. Not only are they refusing to report on his increasingly worsening cognitive decline and is lessening attachment to reality. They're covering up for it, and this is the worst part about this whole story. They're not only covering it up, they don't want you to see it yet.
That's the worst part, Joe. And where would you see where would the most of the largest number of people, where would they see firsthand the rapidly sadly, I mean, that I don't wish ill will on anybody. Politics is politics. Not going to lose my moral spine to win an election? I don't wish ill will on anybody. But where would the most number of people, the largest group of people see Joe Biden's rapidly deteriorating situation? The answer is obvious.
The verdict is in the debates debate. Which will be watched by tens of millions. I said to you yesterday, Democrats are ducking the debates now and they're media activists, liberal allies inside the mainstream media, which is no longer mainstream. They're all radicals. Now, we're now covering hat tip, the Reagan Battalion account of social media. Here's what they put out yesterday. Here's a montage of media people trying to cover up for the fact that they don't want Biden on the debate stage now because you're all going to see what I just told you.
New York Times. Let's scrap the presidential debates. CNN political analyst makes a plea for Biden not to debate Trump. Here's another one by Peter Lucas. Biden better walk back any offers to debate Trump. Newsweek supporters urged Joe Biden not to debate Trump applaud hosts for canceling over covid-19 return. Folks, again, the media is a disgrace in this country. They're a disgrace. I'm all about the free press. All about period. Full stop. No caveats.
You don't break the law and threaten someone free, you are free to write what you want. As I say often with that freedom I respect, you are free to be stupid. You take us up on that opportunity every single time. Pitching us the PPY hoax and all that other stuff, you're just a bunch of discredited losers, like nobody really trying to understand that, right? I showed you that Axios Harris poll last week. Remember that one, Joe?
The media during the covid-19 crisis, the coronavirus crisis in the media is only one of two entities that has lost more trust in the coronavirus crisis, media and the airlines. Nobody trusts you. You're what you have one job, one, just one. Get people the facts so they can make informed decisions. You can't even do that, right? These are literally some of the dumbest people on the planet. You have one job if you are a gavel maker.
This thing has really stood the test of time, is it not, Joe, that we get a lot of things? People said this this sucker's been around forever from gavel person who said this, this. I'm sorry, I forget what the characters are. But this said, if you're one job is to make gavels and you hit the gavel to gavel falls apart, you failed your gavel sucks. Your one job in the media is to tell people the facts.
And you can't even do that, right? Nobody believes you. They don't believe you're a joke. That's why shows like this have exploded in popularity, exploded in popularity because people know they're not being lied to. And if we get some wrong, we actually corrected. Unlike the collusion hoaxers who have yet to apologize for lying to America now showing you again. How this situation, ladies and gentlemen, is getting dramatically worse by the minute, speaking again about Joe Biden and his cognitive decline.
Again, nobody should get any enjoyment out. I know you don't, but you need to see this. You're about to vote for a man who's going to take hold of the nuclear codes, who has no grasp on reality at all. Here is Joe Biden again, clip number six thousand four hundred twenty six, losing his attachment whatsoever with reality during an interview. And I want you to listen for the trick here. Here's what Biden does. Biden frequently loses.
His attachment to what he's thinking about, his train of thought, he loses it. And when he forgets what he's talking about, did you notice the show, he always calls it the thing. Remember that clip before you talk about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? And he's like, the thing, you know, the thing, the thing he forgets Mid-State made me sentence it's sentence midsentence. He forgets what he's talking about, made sense, and he calls it the thing.
Watch him do it again. Here. Listen for the thing. Check this out. You know, there's a during World War Two, you know, or Roosevelt came up with a thing that, you know, was totally different than a than the House Call. He called it the you know, the World War Two. He had the world the war production board.
My guess is someone's either talking in his ear. Or has some kind of like signs. I'm not kidding to remind, he clearly doesn't know what he's talking about, the war production. He loses it and it's midsentence. He introduces what he's going to talk about. Roosevelt did this thing. He forgets the name of it midsentence. My guess is someone's either talking in his ear folks or somebodies reminding him on a cue card or something, what the name of it is.
And he calls it the thing until they can come up with it. Folks, again, this isn't just one thing, every candidate Trump included me when I was on the campaign, everybody makes faux pas as you say, things you want to take back. Your tired campaigns are really exhausting. They are even from your basement. If you've if you're doing 20, 30 interviews a day from your basement, which he's not. But I'm not trying to make excuses for the man.
I'm just trying to give you an honest assessment, unlike the media. Well, of what's actually going on. People make mistakes. It's not that Biden makes mistakes. Instead, he makes them. There's not an not an interview I've seen literally not figure, not an interview I've seen with Biden of any substance where he doesn't. Say something so ridiculous or lose his grasp on reality, where you should all be wondering right now what the heck is going on.
I just want to highlight quick is my election block here because it's important we do have an election coming up. You know, red states got an article up to these polls are tightening up, folks. I think people are becoming increasingly uncomfortable with Joe Biden as a presidential candidate right now. I think they're really starting to understand that some of them who don't like you have the pro Trump crowd are obviously going to vote for Trump. Me and Hillary regret that.
My wife you know, Joe, you everybody gets it right. Then you have the people in the middle who I think are starting to realize Biden is just not there. He's just not there. Then you have the anti Trump crowd who are going to vote for Biden no matter what. But I think the people in the middle are starting to realize, and you could see it in Trump's approval ratings going up, that even if they don't like Trump's personality, the bravado, the persona, the machismo kind of thing you see in the red stapes, his approval ratings going up anyway because Biden, they just can't trust them.
This piece is up in the show notes today by Nick. What's his last name? Atom's Trump approval soaring. Voter enthusiasm outstripping that of Biden supporters. You see in that now. And interestingly enough, Trump's approval by Rasmussen right now is 51 percent, which is good. Obama is at the same time, Joe was 44 percent. So if you're going to tell me like Trump is, it's over. It's old folks, hard past, not predicting anything at this point.
I'm staying out of the prediction game. I'm simply telling you, any of these apocalyptic predictions that Trump is doomed, he has no chance of winning are just absurd. You can sideline all those. All right. Let me move on, because I've got a lot of material to cover, including some stuff from yesterday I didn't get to. So as you know, I maintain a pretty good network of sources in law enforcement, federal, local, state and elsewhere.
And some people who I met as a byproduct of doing the show, they show up at book signings, whatever they may be. I mean, until I met two seven nine two seven nine, I met through correspondences, let's say, and having a show and having an audience, people reach out to me. I get a lot of emails. So we you know, we Vadum, of course, make sure they're for real, for police officers and otherwise.
And some of my contacts have been give me the inside scoop about what's happening on the street. I mentioned this on Hannity last night. I do Sean Hannity show and I of Fox. By the way, Sean Hannity will be a guest on the show. We will have an interview show this week. It will be Sean Hannity. He teased it last night. Don't miss it. Where are you going? To watch it Friday or Saturday? Thanks for listening to the Gutfeld interview to talk about his new book on Live Free or Die.
Really good. Read it now. Got to get through that so we don't miss that. But I mentioned last night the real street situation. Why are shootings and homicides exploding and paradoxically. Why are they exploding shootings and homicides, but why are other crime categories, even some violent crimes down? Down. That doesn't make sense than we've heard liberal cities are exploding with crime. They are the worst crime of all shootings and homicides can't come back from that one.
Now you're dead. That's the end of it. But other categories of crimes, even violent crimes have been going down, that doesn't seem. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. Let's go through this one by one. First, what's really going on and why are shootings and homicides up? And to be crystal clear, because we do facts here up dramatically. In liberal run cities, and so we're defining our variables correctly, unlike mainstream media loons who love to lie to you when I say liberal cities, I'm discussing cities here, Chicago, New York, that are monopolistic, run by liberals, their city councils, their city governance boards, their city commissions, their mayors are all liberals supermajority.
Chicago, New York. You understand Republicans have almost no power. Almost none. They can't filibuster things, they have no majorities. You get what I'm saying. So when we talk about the explosion in shootings and homicides in liberal run cities, that's I'm defining the variable precisely unlike media lunatics who never give you precise definitions. And when I say exploding, I'm talking specifically about Chicago in New York. What's going on? Well, here's my context for telling me when I called last night, the judges don't forget this.
It's gangs. And kids on the street with grievances that have had these grievances for a long time. Now, when I say kids and adults on the street who have grievances, I, I'm talking about sociopaths. I'm not talking about like Joe and I have a grievance over a show where Joe made an and. Oh, my God, Joe, what are you a bad at? That stinks. Joe and I are civil, civilized folks who we're not going to.
Joe, I'd like to challenge you to a Hamilton bird duel in New Jersey on a cliff. Joe and I are going to do that. We're grown adults. We're going to talk it out. Paul was mad at me last Friday. Do you think we work things out? Because it's me and Paul. I even said it on the Gutfeld Show became kind of a long time in the interview show. Went totally off the rails at one point. So hilarious.
But we're adults. That's not what some of these criminal, these criminal, this criminal element in the street when they have grievances, Joe, a lot of times it turns deadly. So I'll get to the gangs thing in a minute. But you may say, well, if they've had these grievances for a long time, why are shootings and homicides spiking right now? You just said they've had these grievances for a while. Well, let's dig a little deeper.
This is from my law enforcement friends, these sociopaths and the street drug lords, whenever they all hate each other, who would have whacked each other sooner, weren't doing so years ago in many cases. No one, because a lot of them were already in jail. Deep analysis right now, credible, I'm being sarcastic here because one what I just told you was true, but two, it doesn't require a deep analysis when Rudy Giuliani and even Mike Bloomberg, who continue who is the mayor of New York City, both times of New York City.
And even Bloomberg, who continued some of Rudy Giuliani's policing broken Windows policies, they aggressively policed the city. Again, I don't mean aggressive physically like they were hunting people down, I mean aggressive in that they enforce the law. If you were a drug dealer on the corner and you got caught with an open container, open container of liquor, you're not allowed to drink in the streets of New York. I'm not debating whether that's a good or bad.
I'm just telling you what is. OK, unlike the media, you would probably get a sea summons. And if the cop was going to write a summons, he would give you a pat down around your waist to make sure you don't have a gun. You wouldn't shoot him while he was writing the summons. That's you were allowed to do that? Well, when we started doing that, New York City people got caught urinating in public, open container, disorderly conduct, and they got patted down.
A lot of those guns with these people who had grievances got taken off the street because the guy who was going to be arrested for an open container was now arrested for what? Other criminal possession of a firearm? The Giuliani era doubled down by May, you know, there were basically mandatory sentences for a lot of these people as well. So the word got out in the street with these sociopaths, with grievances and fights, with their beefs, with their other drug dealers and other people in a neighborhood.
The word got out, don't carry a gun in the street, these guys will toss you, frisked you for, you know, open containers or disorderly conduct, you're going to go to jail for a year. Ladies and gentlemen, criminals talk. They're not stupid. They have criminal enterprises they have to run through. They're not dumb. They're not they know what they're doing. Some of them would actually be pretty good business people if they get out of the criminal business.
Word got around in New York, don't carry a gun, so what did they do? I remember this when I was a cop. They'd sit in groups and they still wanted protection. So they keep the gun and they put it like in a paper bag and stored on a bench next to them. So we learned this cops again to go and look at the scene to now, everyone would say, I saw my gun. You couldn't arrest anyone for it, but at least you got the gun off the street.
If you saw it, you have it. I'm saying it's not yours. OK, we're just going to vouchers. We're going to inventory it.
Right? Right. You see what I'm saying? Word got out. Criminals are not stupid folks, they're maintaining their enterprises, too. They're illegal, but they're doing it. Nobody's doing that anymore. They're not tossing people, they're not frisking people, that's a cop term for frisking. They're not frisking people for disorderly conduct. They're not frisking people for drug possession. They're not doing any of that. So guys are like, I might as well carry our guns again.
And then when the guy who had the grievance against the guy I don't mean to get too complicated here finds out his buddies carrying a gun. You don't want to get whacked. So he carries his gun, too. And then they see each other and it's the Wild West. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. This is what it is. It's a Wild West. It's an old Clint Eastwood movie.
And another guy, here's the other guy got shot, he said, I'm not getting shot, I'm going to get my gun. Do this is what, folks? None of this is complicated to understand. You have people with long standing street grievances, drug fights, turf wars, whatever they may be. Combine that with rival gangs who've hated each other forever, who now get word amongst the street grievance crowd that, hey, you carry a gun, you're not going to get locked up and they're shooting each other up.
So we're going to shoot up each other to. This is not hard to figure out, criminals talk. So that's element number one, why are shootings and homicides up, because people have no fear of being arrested for carrying guns anymore, grievances they've had in the past and now turning into gunfights, not grievances and gangs are taking notes. Oh, yeah, nobody's getting pinched for gun possession as well. Carry hours where the toughest gang in town will show you.
I want to be like the Cowboys from Tombstone or something. Now, second part. This is a real paradox for people to figure out why is why are other categories of crime down, in some cases down dramatically? Burglaries, many cases, street robberies, but shootings and violent crimes, if these liberal cities are becoming violent, Wild West like towns, which they are, by the way. Why are other violent crimes down? I said the sunshine.
So if you listen, you probably get a sneak peek ahead, but I'll tell you again. Folks, the economies in these largely liberal run cities, Chicago and New York, to be fair, as a result, the coronavirus and let's not just simply the Liberal Party has a lot to do with it, but a lot to do with the coronavirus. Misinform Dopy Lockdown's to the economies are so bad, nobody's coming into the city. So what's the problem, Joe?
There's no one to mug, there's nobody on the streets, who are you going to mug? Picking among the pigeons, there's nobody there. Now, why would burglaries be down? I asked Paula last night when the bed, she was almost trying to sleep, whatever I said, why do you think she figured it out right away? She smart because people are home all the time.
They're not going to work. So burglaries are down to. Don't get why am I telling you any of this? Because I watched Marie Harf, I think it was on Fox, and I see a lot of these liberal commentators, they do the same thing. Ladies and gentlemen, I talked about it yesterday and relationship, that unemployment benefit and this study, that's a scam. You have to learn to pick apart liberal narratives piece by piece. Their new narrative about exploding crimes in largely liberal cities, shootings and homicides, which is very real.
There are dead bodies to prove in their new narrative as well. Other categories of crimes are down. Yeah, that's because the economies are so bad that there's nobody there to rob. That's not a marker of success. Please, the verdict is in. Please stop saying that. That sounds really dumb. There's nobody to mug in burglars right now because everybody's home is no empty house to burglarize. And what are the other arguments they're making, which, of course, takes an element of truth, Joe, and.
Fabricates and weaves a fantastic narrative from it, that's not true, you have to learn to pass this to the other narrative. I've heard them say the liberal talking heads on television. Is, well, violent crime and shootings and shootings in many cases and homicides are up in some cities, Republican mayors to. They're not wrong. There are cities with Republican mayors out there that have seen a blip in shootings, Tulsa, Jacksonville, with Lenny Curry, and that may have Tulsa's a Republican to.
But again, folks, you have to parse it and see what they're doing, they're trying to distract you. Those shootings are up and in some cases homicides are. But they are up by maybe 10, 15 percent. Cities run by Democrats, they are up twenty five percent or more in many cases in New York and Chicago, in some cases triple digits when it comes to shooting. So, again, your point is what, that yes, there's shootings and homicides have spiked in Republican cities, but far more.
And Democrats, if that's your point, to defend the Democrats. I'm unsure where you're going with this. I am. I am. I am I missing your point here? Of course, is you don't have one. You have to learn to pass through their nonsense. And ladies and gentlemen, it's always, always nonsense. All right, let me get to my second sponsor. I want to get to the Joe. Remember the movie script? It's back.
Yeah. Yeah. Oh, good movie script is bad. What's the movie script? Why does it relate to Spygate? Well, just before I get there, a second sponsor, but ladies and gentlemen, the plot to take down Trump started twenty seven two thousand seven. That's not even possible. Hear me out. We'll get to it. All right. Today's show also support to my friends that we the people got in here. This is what a difference they usually show you the Constitution Hall.
But sometimes I like this one. This is more simple. This is black, simpler look, but still the same precision mold, a fantastic top of the line inside the waistband holster. You're going to love it. Listen, if covered wasn't warning enough, the last few weeks have reminded us all why there's a Second Amendment. You don't want this defunding the police nonsense. You might be the only one there to defend yourself in some of these places.
That's why you need to be properly trained with a firearm and you need a top of the line precision fit holster. And we like here and I like and I carry as we the people holster starting at just thirty nine dollars, we the people holsters are custom designed to fit your firearm perfectly. Look at that. That's a precision mode. You can look right through it, fit to your firearm perfectly. It's not some one size fits all where the firearm is going to be bouncing all over the place, God forbid, and it falls out.
It's made right here in the USA. It's not made in the Chaz, it's not made in the chop, made in the great old USA, they have thousands of options to choose from, plus an amazing selection of printed holidays to show you the Constitution. But I have this one, too. I like this one. Sometimes I like the black because it fits in with the color pad somewhere or whatever it may be. Their proprietary clipped design you'll see on the back allows you to adjust the cat in the right.
So it's comfortable, not like, again, those other inside the waistband rubbing up against that hippo. And you're like, oh, I get this thing out of here, support American companies go to we the people holsters that comment and get yours today don't we can't beat the prices either. Every hoster ships free comes with a lifetime guarantee. You get an additional ten dollars off with you offer accordant. Come on. Ten dollars off, extra weight off Kodmani.
Can't be that satisfaction guaranteed. Not a perfect fit. Send it back for a total refund. Go to we the people hostas dotcom slash Dan that's we the people hostas dot com slash day and go today. Pick us up. You're going to love it. Check them out. All right.
So some of my older listeners, I mean older chronologically in your age, I mean older than that. You've been here a long time. Know that. I love the Spygate story, but they only talk about it when I feel like I have something to say because I feel like I'm trying to sell you too much on something and I don't want to do that. But the spying scandal on President Trump is the biggest political scandal of our time. There is not even a close second.
It's very simple, Obama, Hillary and a bunch of political operatives, they paid, spied on the president and got the FBI to basically open criminal cases against their political opponents. It's no more complicated than that. But I want to bring this up today because some of the high quality sources I rely on and who were cited in my next book coming out, Follow the Money, where I address, by the way, extensively some of the things you're going to see here, especially the George Soros connection, which I haven't even mentioned yet.
It's in my book. It's a it's like the whole first two chapters of my book. One of the arguments breaking out is, OK, if all this stuff was fake, Geita dossier was fake and they used it to spy on Trump. Well, where did it come from? It's a great argument to have. Don't get me wrong, and I'm not downplaying the terrific social media researchers and really important people who use social media to investigate that question.
I'm simply suggesting to you that in the end, for the bigger, you know, story, it doesn't really matter. What matters is the information was fake. The Obama administration knew it. The FBI knew it. Hillary Clinton knew it. And they used it to spy on Trump anyway. But if we're going to get into that debate about who exactly made up the Peekapoo stuff and where exactly did this Russian collusion hoax originate, I want to make sure I can go back to this, because this is covered in my second book on this topic, exonerated.
And my next book, Follow the Money, where I talk about the Soros connection I'm going to get to in a minute. I want to go back to this two thousand and seven two zero zero seven article by Glenn Simpson. Glenn Simpson's company, Fusion GPS, is the company that put its stamp on the dossier. They were paid to produce the dossier. They paid a British spy to write this dossier. Glenn Simpson, as we can see here, used to be a reporter.
Really? Yes. With his wife, Mary Jacoby for The Wall Street Journal. Here's this article from 2007. I call the movie script How Lobbyists Help Ex Soviets Were Washington. Back in 2007, the guy Hillary paid to grab the dossier and get it out there was writing articles about how Russians are trying to woo people in Washington. Yes. Yes. Ladies and gentlemen, if you compare Christopher Steele's dossier, who worked with Simpson on it, the pretape stuff, the fake stuff.
If you compare it to this article in 2007 that Glenn Simpson and his wife wrote. You're going to be like, my gosh, it sounds like it's almost the same thing. That's why I call this 2007 article from The Wall Street Journal by Simpson, the movie script, the movie script to take down Trump, ladies and gentlemen, was already written. Matter of fact, they tried the same tactic on John McCain when he ran for president. You didn't know that.
Yeah, yeah. That's in my book, too. You don't remember the John McCain Russian collusion scandal? Yeah, nobody else does either. It happened. Nobody else remembers it because George Bush was president when John McCain was running against Obama and Bush's team didn't allow it to go anywhere. The Obama team allowed the FBI to be used. You get it. You dig. Here's where this whole dossier tape, Russian collusion things start to hit back in 2007.
Let me lay out for you bit by bit. I'm going to show you I'm going to show you how the same exact cast of characters appear in Two Thousand and Seven by Glenn Simpson. Remember? He's the one paid to produce the dossier, but Simpson has always said, no, no, Christopher Steele did it. We paid him and he had this network of sources as all garbage. It's all garbage. This was Simpson's story from the start. Look, let's go to screenshot one from the movie script, The Wall Street Journal piece.
Again, this is from two thousand seven they're talking about in this piece, this guy, Leonid Reman, remedies under federal investigation in the US over money laundering and is locked in a high stakes battle with Moscow conglomerate Alpha for control of a Russian telecommunications empire. Alpha ba ba ba. Why does this man so in two thousand seven, Glenn Simpson, same guy who's running this whole Dossie operation back in 2007, is talking about this Alpha Financial Bank place, Alpha Alpha.
Where do they appear again? Totally weird day up here in Christopher Steele, Dossier Alpha, twenty seven back in the PP dossier. Here's an article by National Review by Tobias. I can never pronounce his last name, but that's OK. That's good stuff. These articles, by the way, will be in the show notes today by dot com newsletter. Read them. They're older, but they're worth your time. Bunshiro dot com slash newsletter. Subscribe to the newsletter.
That is the shows here. Mr. Tobias still claims Clinton lawyer provided a tip about Trump campaign contacts with a Russian bank. So Christopher Steele, who's working with Simpson. The same guy who wrote about Alpha Bank at thousand seven. Got a tip about a bank. No way that bank will be alpha. From the Democrats at the DNC and the lawyers they hired who were working with Simpson. No way. Well, let's go to the National Review piece yesterday.
So Steele claimed at a deposition that his infamous dossier that the founders of Alpha Bank, oh, my God, same Alpha from that 2007 article had illicit ties to Putin and acted as an undercover messaging channel between the Kremlin and the Trump organization. He said under questioning from the lawyer of the bank owners who sued him for defamation that he revealed on July twenty nine. Twenty sixteen. This is Christopher Steele that he was told of the story by Perkins Kawi lawyer.
These are Democrat lawyers there and former DOJ official Michael Sussman, who we know is meeting with the FBI. Don't get too lost in the detail here, folks, because the details don't matter. They don't in this case. What really matters is back in 2007, Christopher John Glenn Simpson, excuse me, was writing about Alpha Bank, Alpha Bank magically appears in the dossier years later to target Trump. And Steele says he heard the information from lawyers working with Simpson.
This gets even better, look at this second screenshot from National Review where where Simpson gives Steele instructions. He gives them very specific instructions and says, I want you to absolutely link it to the server issue, the Alpha Bank server. Steele then admitted this is in a court deposition that Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, again, the guy who wrote the Wall Street Journal piece in 2007 about Alpha, asked him after the meeting, the meeting about Alpha with the Democrat lawyers to write up a memo that was, quote, absolutely and definitely linked to the Alpha, the server issue involving Alpha malarias.
Ladies and gentlemen, Simpson had this movie script in his hand the whole time, they just the race, the names and put Trump in their Alpha Bank. Oh, I've been working on them since 2007. Hey, I think we can connect them to the Trump team and a server in the Trump Tower in Alphabet. Is there any real connection? No, no. It's all made up. But still, go talk to the Democrats. They'll tell you more about it and then write a memo.
Absolutely linking them to Alpha. Again, Simpson made this up. I thought it was called the Steele dossier. No, it's the Simpson Steele, however, dossier, they all had a role in it. You don't think this story started in 2007? OK, all right, Dan Alpha Bank, Pearson Glenn's article, Glenn Simpson's article appears in the dossier stuff. That's got to be that that that that's we got to run all this more. That is more.
Stand down, stand easy. As I said in the academy, stand easy. Here's a movie script. Wall Street Journal, 2007. Screenshot number two, Crazy Joe, who appears here, Paul Manafort, back in two thousand seven two thousand seven. No way. Yes way. Yes way. Saeki Paul Manafort, a former adviser to Mr. Dole's presidential campaign, has advised the Ukrainian metals billionaire and close political ally Viktor Yanukovych, who favors closer ties with the Putin administration.
So just to be clear. Back in 2007, 13 years ago, Glenn Simpson, a Fusion GPS who pays Christopher Steele, is writing an article he's really concerned about. Paul Manafort ties to Russia. This is two thousand and seven. Manafort then magically appears in the Trump campaign. We heard. And then what happens, Manafort all of a sudden becomes a target of an FBI investigation. Based on a fake black ledger of payments allegedly made to Manafort, oh, you don't believe me?
Check out this article by John Solomon when he was over at the Hill before the Hill went crazy. John Solomon, the Hill FBI warned early and often that the Manafort file might be a fake and he used it anyway. So just to be clear for everyone and this debate away, I read all your stuff, you guys are all great. For debating the did the information start with steel, danylenko, Olga, all these people, all good questions.
I'm going to throw out to you that the large majority of the fake PPACA was a story Christopher Simpson wrote in 2007, all of the players who reappear in the dossier against Trump and if they reappear, they are targeted based on fake information like Manafort, where they produced magically a fake dossier called the black ledger that appeared out of Ukraine. Look, we got to investigate Manafort. We've got this ledger of payments he was made to pay taxes on. It was all fake.
It was all fake, it was all fake. Just like the Alpha Bank, Trump Tower connection fake. But they needed fake information because they needed to go back to Christopher Simpson. Glenn Simpson excuse me, his movie script. To make it seem that it was real. All right, Dan Alpha appears in 2007. Manafort, you got anything else? I always do, of course. This is a fascinating one. So back in two thousand seven, Glenn Simpson writes in The Wall Street Journal about Oleg Deripaska, who has close ties to the Kremlin and emerged from the aluminum wars of the 90s with a virtual monopoly on the nation's aluminum production.
Deripaska has long been dogged by allegations from rivals that he uses bribery, intimidation and violence to amass his fortune. Oleg Deripaska. So we know back in 2007, Glenn Simpson is really interested in Alpha Bank. Alpha Bank appears in the dossier against Trump. Wow, crazy. Interested in Paul Manafort. Manafort appears in the dossier with Trump crazy using fake information to target. Now we know Deripaska is in that two thousand seven article. There's no way he reappears in the scheme to take down.
Trump inspired him, right? Of course he reappears. Let's go to this Fox News article. Yeah, every single time. Fox News Democrat Senator Mark Warner, who conveniently was on the Intelligence Committee targeting Trump, texted with a Russian oligarch lobbyist in an effort to contact the dossier. Author Christopher Steele, who's the Russian oligarch? No way, ladies and gentlemen. Yes way.
It's Oleg Deripaska who appears back in the 2007 movie script article by Glenn Simpson, paid by Hillary Clinton to gin up fake information on Donald Trump. Now, you may say, gosh, this can't get any worse. Ladies and gentlemen, as I say, every day, it always gets worse. Always. Yeah, everyone.
Glenn Simpson seems to be interested in his journalism career, if you want to call it that, back in 2007 seems to magically reappear in this fantastic PPY tape story. He writes again. To target Donald Trump, he took the movie script, Simpson attached fake information to real names, Christopher Steele, Dan Chanko and others, and just had them rewrite a dossier. Steele told you he was instructed by Simpson to put this stuff in there. Simpson wrote this stuff.
Here's the last one from the movie script. There's actually more in there. But in the interest of time, I want to keep this short and sweet, this segment, because it's a good one. I wanted to punch. So he also writes rant about this guy, Demetrio Firtash. He says he talks about his company, Hierarch Holdings, controlled by Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian businessman who acknowledges the company's major shareholders, once included Mr. Mogilevich his wife.
So back in 2007, again, Glenn Simpson has an unusual interest in this guy, Demetrio Firtash, here's where the case gets interesting with a George Soros angle just kicks you right in the gut. So who is Demetrio Firtash? Well, in short, Firtash is a business rival of the infamous George Soros, you know, liberal billionaire mega donor who's got his tentacles in all kinds of things, races in the United States, political action committees, liberal causes everywhere, far left, anti law and order, district attorneys races, Soros money is everywhere.
Firtash is an enemy of saurus. And it's interesting that Glenn Simpson has a real interest in Firtash in trying to take Firtash down. So race have anything to do with that? You may say, well, that's an interesting angle, how does it relate to the dossier that appeared in all the anti Trump conspiracy theories that appeared later on? Let's go to another article at the formerly excellent Hill. Now, a pile of trash when John Solomon was still there.
It was great. The Hill U.S. Embassy press Ukraine to drop probe of George Soros during the 2016 election.
You remember this story. This is fascinating, so Firtash, who Simpson writes about in a movie script, is an enemy of George Soros, a business, a business rival of George Soros, Soros has a real interest in Firtash. It's not a good one. From that helps this is gets really interesting. So there's a memo that was circulated, including a chart of the Ukrainians the Soros team wanted to have pursued, including some with ties to Manafort, who magically appears in a movie script to.
Senior law enforcement officials confirmed to Solomon that the early cleptocracy collaboration's inside Ukraine. Listen to this led to highly visible U.S. actions against the oligarch, Dmytro Firtash, a major target of the Soros group. Oh, boy. So just to be clear. Back in 2007, Glenn Simpson, who was working on a dossier that I'm going to show you in a second later on, is funded by a Soros related group. Glenn Simpson years ago had an interest in a serious business rival who it's alleged by law enforcement contact Solomon has saurus wanted prosecuted?
Why did the same guy Firtash prosecuted? Simpson, Firtash saurus, Firtash, Firtash, Manafort. Ladies and gentlemen, it's a movie script. The whole thing was written in 2007. It was tried against McCain. It didn't work. It was just recycled garbage used to prosecute Trump later. The origin of these stories is clear. How much did Soros have to do with this? Again, the first two chapters of my book, it's coming out in October, you can preorder it now.
Follow the money. My best one yet are about this Soros angle that no one wants to talk about because they're afraid of the lunatics at Media Matters. We don't care at all. And matter of fact, when they bring it up, it only encourages me to talk about it more and write more books. Can't talk about source. I'll talk about whatever I want. So George Soros is business opponent, was a target of Glenn Simpson, too, as far back as 2007 and appeared on some not do not prosecute this, but a go and prosecute list.
Go get this guy, Firtash, Soroses group, one of that is that to take out a business rival that if anything, to do with Glenn Simpson's interest in Firtash, I'm just checking. I'm just asking the question is that is that OK? We've got to do that. Going to have to find one more thing. Let's start one more thing in here. Let's go to this Federalist article about George Soros, because this is fascinating, too, by Paul Sperry from a while ago.
Again, be up in the Shonen Soros funded PR shop constructing media echo chamber to push impeachment. Fascinating. Let's look at this little takeaway from the piece about how George Soros seems to have the exact same enemies as Glenn Simpson, who wrote about these people. So the Democracy Integrity Project is led by Dan Jones. The Democracy Integrity Project, which takes money from sourest, by the way, who worked for Dianne Feinstein? It employs the key opposition research figures behind the salacious and unverified dossier Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson and ex British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.
Its financial backers include actor director Rob Reiner and billionaire activist George Soros.
So Simpson writes it back in 2007, Glenn Simpson. About Dmytro Firtash saurus doesn't like Firtash, allegations surfaced that Soros wants Firtash prosecuted in Ukraine conveniently to hide Ukraine and impeachment. Hoke's developes against Trump, who's looking into what happened in Ukraine. We then find out that Soros has one of his groups is financing a Democrat staffer who's then paying Simpson and Steele and others to continue to look into the dossier. The same people had an interest in George Soros, his business opponent, and taking him down a while back, I don't know Firtash about vouching for Firtash.
I'm just saying you don't find that a little unusual, that George Soros, whose money is clearly filtering down into the dossier project funded by Hillary Clinton, the Soros team and others, that the same enemies of Soros are the enemies of this guy, Glenn Simpson, who put together the whole dossier, which still you don't find that even a little bit unusual. Crazy. Crazy how they're missing only the biggest story of our time. There's a movie script, folks.
It was always a movie script, the old names were scratched out, Haley Barbour, Bob Dole, those were the names in a 2007 article, Republicans, by the way, and they were replaced with Donald Trump and John McCain. It's really no more complicated than that. Outside of Manafort, none of these people had any attachment to the Trump campaign at all. It was all made up. Alpha Bank, the Manafort Black ledger, it's all garbage.
All right. Let me get on to my last sponsor, and I want to talk about this video here in this article about the teachers unions. This is getting worse. And an email I got am I going to mention the teacher's name in an email I got? That's very important. So don't go anywhere. It's going to be an important segment. All right. Finally Today, show you by our friends at Cars for Kids. Listen, if you have a car, it's taking up space, sitting in your driveway and you don't use it in your paying insurance on.
I have a serious question for you. Why are you doing that? Get rid of it. Donate it to cars for kids. That's KRS, the number for kids, cars for kids. Many of you've heard the jingle. Why it's such it's everybody.
You know. You know that you've heard it's Paul like laughing because she knows I can't jingle very well. And I'm a terrible singer, but I enjoy it. It is the greatest jingle ever. You get a tax deduction and a vacation voucher. Here's how it works. Cars for kids.
Uh, uh, uh, I'm now I'm just doing it to thoroughly enjoy. It's cars for kids makes the process of donating your car quick and easy, it takes about two minutes. They handle all the details, all the paperwork. They're really great. All you need to do is schedule a pickup and sign the title. Your car donation is fast and free, usually picked up within 24 hours. And even at the same day, cars for kids will take your car.
Even if it's not running, don't your car's tax deductible. Your tax deduction is based on the sale price of your car. Cars for kids works hard to sell your car for the best price. That means more funds for their charity and a bigger tax deduction for you. And as a special thank you for donating your car. Cars for kids gives you a vacation voucher. Good for a three day and two night hotel. Stay with cars for kids.
You get professional service, convenient, pick up a maximum tax deduction as big a vacation voucher and a good donate today at Cars for kids. That's k a r. S the number for kids, kids, dogbone Genom. That's cars, KRS, the number four kids, dog cars for kids, dogs, Bungeni cars, the number for kids, dogbone jail. They give you the donation experience. You deserve a deserve again, cars for kids that Ogbonna go today.
Good cause. You OK? You don't like my jingle stare and that. It's a good jingle. It is. It's addictive.
Oh, I think they are the majority, Raychelle, I love the Spygate stuff, and it only comes up once in a while. Today's a good opportunity. All right. So I read this article in The Wall Street Journal. Listen, ladies and gentlemen, this again, I can't say this enough. I don't want to keep repeating content, but I'm just as a friendly reminder. To the teachers unions out there, you are making a catastrophically awful decision, trying to extort parents into making bad decisions by keeping their kids out of school.
Terrible worst decision ever. Here's the Journal article I'm talking about school opening, extortion. Teachers unions are using covid-19 as a political weapon. Again, I can't think of a more disgusting thing to do. Now, before I get into the segment, I just want to be crystal clear. The teacher's unions are totally disgracing themselves. Totally. It's it's beyond it's disgusting. It's so gross right now that whoever's telling you this is a long term strategy to get parents onto your side by extorting them and threatening to not teach their kids is so bad that you should have the political consultant who told you to do this arrested for political malpractice.
Seriously, I don't know who you are. I told you an example of blue, deep blue Montgomery County in my former home state of Maryland, where liberal parents are losing their marbles over what's going on right now. Having said that, I can't be clearer. I can't be any clearer. This is not about the teachers. I get volumes of emails from teachers. One, she asked to remain nameless. I'm obviously not going to say her name, but sent me a very nice email.
You know who you are saying, Dan? Eighty percent of the teachers I talked to him just citing her email, 80 percent are dying to go back to school. They know how terrible this is. Some of them are afraid of losing their jobs and they are disgusted by what the teachers unions are doing. I say that because I'll still get an email once a while thinking this is an attack on teachers. It is not. It's like, Joe, perfect example for you, right?
Joe is in the radio business for a long time. There is a broadcasters union and some people have to join. I know people who had to join who hate being a part of that union. I'm just saying they've told me that I don't know anything about them. I'm not in I'm not badmouthing. I'm just saying I remember this conversation. I'm tired of paying these dues. I don't like these people. There are two different things. The broadcaster, the union, the two separate things here.
The teachers don't know exactly what the teachers and the teachers union. This is not about the teachers. Not about the unions are a disgrace. From the Journal piece, this is a great line, like whoever told them this was a good idea, the universe, we're not going to teach your kids and you're going to pay us for a good strategy there, folks. Quote Wall Street Journal, The teachers unions have a cynical interest in forcing their competitors to shut down to.
What a humiliation it would be if charter and private schools reopen and demonstrate that in-person education can be done with the right medication, or if parents unsatisfied with the public schools response to the coronavirus decide a private school would be better for their child. Can you can it get any worse? Can you imagine a worse scenario where the teachers now the teachers unions don't want their teachers educating your kids in public schools, but they don't want their competitors in non-union charter schools open either because they don't want to be humiliated when the teachers open up and do it safely.
That's right. I mean, I'm Joe, I'm not kidding. Can you imagine a worse strategy? I mean, I'm trying to think of, like, analogies here to make sense how bizarre this may be, like in Joe's old business. Listen, we don't like our radio audience. So what are we going to do is we're going to keep the show off the air for a month until advertisers start paying a higher rate. You'd be like Goodwin, is that right?
We're not broadcasting anything until you come up with higher CPMs for ads. You'd be like, who? Who told you this was a good idea? Who told you this? This is we're not teaching your kids until you pay us more. And by the way, if you try to send your kid to a competitor. We're going to shut them down to the making it even worse. We're not running a radio show to the advertisers. We could be nothing but white noise on the air.
And by the way, we're boycotting our competitor. We're going to shut them down, too. You can't even listen to them do. We're going to make sure they're off the air. Who told you this was a good strategy? Where did you get this? On what planet do you think this is going to work? I'm doing this fighting for the teacher, I'm not kidding. I love teachers, I always miss Shortie. No, I don't even know if Mr.
Norteño still alive. I love Miss Teno St Pancras, my fourth grade teacher. She was great. She used to give me books I'd pretend to read. It was terrific. Or Lady War of the Worlds she gave me what's a what's the call of the Wild West, Bokan. Everything she got, I tell her I read them. I don't think she knew as she probably knew. I didn't read them. But I just like the free books Swiss Family Robinson.
But they were around that. Eventually I picked them up and looked at them, I think actually read the call about probably seven years later. But I love Miss Norteño. She was great, Miss Gill Feather, I know she's passed God rest her soul. She used to say, Dad, I suppose the Cherrie's don't fall in the pits. It was genius. Maybe not Plato like material, but it was genius when you're, whatever, five years old.
Who the hell knows how I forget what year? No, that was fifth grade, so I was older. They were great teachers, Sister Alan. Sister Helen was a little mean in third grade. She wouldn't hesitate to give her on the head. But listen, I learned a lot. I love teachers. I'm doing this in your best interest. I'm not kidding. You all are great. I read your emails. Your unions are failing you.
They are destroying your brand. You have a brand. Everybody has a brand. I don't mean that in a mercenary capitalism sense. I mean, you need parents and you to be on the same team and to be on the same team, your brand is selling the parents on the idea that you're producing value for their kids, is it not? That's what it is, right? We have a brand on this show. Joe, had Joe said, ironically, of all the marketing people ever paid, I swear on my life, we paid a lot of dough for marketing.
Joe said it best to be with him because then our show is everything you need to know in an hour. That was it. I love that. I've never said Joe. That was Joe, not me. I didn't make that up. Joe did. He got no bonus for that either. Said, Damn, this year I have to give you a bonus entry. OK, but that was. That's our brand facts and the stuff you need in an hour, a little over an hour for your ride home.
That's always been our brand. Teachers have a brand, send your kids to us. We're going to teach them the skills they need to succeed in life. Your brand isn't don't dare send your kids to us as we extort you for more money. It's not your brand who's telling you that? That's not your brand. It's not good. Paula's laughing. She saw that she was mad at me after my jingle. That was a great jingle. Now she's back on Tebunginako.
This is great showing you how this is based on nothing. By the way, this we're going to keep your kids out of school until you pay us more. Here's the CDC director. It's a different clip from the one I play is the same guy, but different. This is Dr. Robert Redfield testifying in front of a committee saying, listen, I actually have a person in my family who's high risk and I want them back in school, too.
There is no science to back up your assertions that you should be extorting parents for more money, keeping their kids out of school. Listen to the CDC director himself. Check this out.
I just want to re-emphasize that I don't think I can emphasize it enough. As the director of the Centers for Disease Control, the leading public health agency in the world, it is in the public health interest of these K through 12 students to get these schools back open for face to face learning. Mental health service, seven point one million kids get it in school nutrition. We talked about reporting of child abuse, sexual abuse, mandatory in schools. The isolation that these adolescents are feeling that now is associated with increased, as you mentioned, increased drug overdose deaths and now over increased suicides.
I think it is really important as a grandfather, 11 grandkids, I want these kids back in school. I have one grandchild with cystic fibrosis. I want it done smartly. All right. But I think we have to be honest that the public health interest of the students in this nation right now is to get a quality education and face to face learning. And we need to get on with it, folks.
You just heard it right there. It's really time for the liberal hack media, you know, the PPTA hoaxers who I know they're all about gaslighting and hiding Joe Biden and I really get that. But you're really you're sacrificing an entire generation of kids on the altar of liberal activism. It's time for you to start reporting on this and the disgrace that has become the teachers unions at the total disgrace. It's time for you to tell the American people the scam that's really going.
This is an extortion racket right now based on no science whatsoever. All right. I teased this yesterday. I want to get this this tax article. It's important. I got about 10 minutes left in. The show is a critical, important piece. Folks, you have an election coming up. Obviously, Joe Biden, it's a binary choice at this point. Biden's a disaster. We know that, we know he doesn't know where he is, he doesn't know he's running for president.
But I wanted to focus on for this election 2020 kind of part part dear Section B block. How is he actually going to affect your wallet? Because there's some confusion. And here's where the story originates. My mother in law comes over a lot. We love her to death. And she's really a big Trump supporter, magnet to the core, you know. And when I was explaining to her the things Biden and his Democrat allies have promised to do if he's elected, she was genuinely stunned to the point we had to talk her out of, like not emptying her retirement account.
She was I mean, I'm not trying. And it Paula was, like, mad at me saying, you're freaking out. My mom, she's going to spend all night where I wasn't trying to worry your mom.
I'm just trying to give you the facts so you understand what decision you're making, how critical this is. If you're still up in the air, my mother in law is going to vote for Trump. It's not even a mystery. But there are some people out there who really believe that Biden is somehow going to be good for their wallets. And my question was, why do you believe that? What has he told you that's going to be good for you, your wallet and your business?
Let me go to this Wall Street Journal article, and they lay out a whole bunch of taxes called re Joe Biden's lips, new taxes, more than three trillion and three trillion excuse me, new levies on incomes, payrolls and more. You are going to pay more if you're cool with that and you want to pay more, a lot more. Vote for Biden. That's your guy. I mean, I'm not messing with you. I'm not I'm not trying to scam you, it's not a trick if you like higher taxes and that's what you want for you and everyone else, vote for Joe Biden.
Here they are, by the way. I'm just going to go to a four or five screenshots here. There's like 10 of them in that article. I'm just going through the there's other taxes out there. In other words, he wants to hide that. I'm not even including in the interest of time. Let's go to number one. I told you, I talk about this yesterday. It's important. Individual income taxes. He's already promised to repeal the Trump taxes, the Trump tax cuts.
So if you're a middle class person, your income taxes are going to go up from twenty four to twenty eight percent. Or if you're in the lower middle class, it's going to go up from twenty two to twenty five. And the top marginal rate is going to go to thirty nine point six from thirty seven. They're also going to repeal the ten thousand dollar salt deduction, so a lot of rich folks are going to get a nice little benefit.
If you want to pay more in taxes on the middle class, vote for Biden, your rate will go up. You're paying twenty four percent, you'll now pay twenty eight, three percent more of your income, if you're paying twenty two, you'll pay twenty five, that's three three percent more. One, two, three. If it was Joe Biden. One, two, three. If you're watching the YouTube, you'll get it counted towards next.
You want to pay more, vote for Biden, he's your guy, it's he's solid, he's already I've got to repeal them. They're going to have a majority. If they win, they'll do it lickety split. Number two, payroll taxes, Social Security, the other stuff. He wants to apply the twelve point four percent Social Security tax to all incomes over four hundred thousand with no cap, the current payroll tax comes comes off after one hundred thirty seven thousand dollars come back.
This is important. People understand that Social Security taxes and levied after a certain amount of income, one hundred thirty seven thousand dollars. There's a reason for that. There's an old adage in Washington, D.C., you should memorize. You may not like it. It may not be cute, but everyone in D.C. knows what it is and you know what that is. A program for the poor is a poor program. I remember that one.
Yeah, I know. I know. I was going to say like you, because I've said I've heard this from many people. Why is a program designed for the poor a poor program in Washington, D.C. parlance?
Because to get mass consensus on an issue, Social Security, Medicare, whatever, you need to pass a program, people want to feel like, yes, it's helping people who are poor, but you have to earn it. You may not like that, you may be a liberal and you may feel like nobody should have to earn anything, I don't care. I'm telling you to get the United States and Mars to back a program, Social Security else, they want to feel like people have to earn it.
The idea with Social Security is after one hundred thirty seven thousand dollars, the rest is just redistributed money and you're just paying for other people's retirement income. So in order to make Social Security feel like an earned benefit, because you're not going to get that much from it, you're the earnings you could be taxed on. We're cap. Because anything taxed above that, you weren't getting back and it would be redistributed, redistributed, you get it. No one wants to pay for a retirement fund for someone else.
That's why they kept it. They're blowing that cap out, which will make it a poor program because it'll be a program for the poor. Believe me, once rich liberals catch on to the fact that they're paying to finance other people's retirements, I don't care what they tell you about compassion for the little guy. Dreaded eloquence that's going to go away tomorrow. A program for the poor is a poor program. You want to destroy Social Security, take out the camp tomorrow.
Watch all the rich liberals panic. Tax number three, which is about to go up, so your Social Security taxes are going to go through the roof, your income taxes are going to get high chromatically capital gains, if you're earning more than a million, they're going to tax capital gains and dividends as regular income at a new top rate of thirty nine point six percent. That's double the current rate. Capital gains haven't been taxed as bad since the 1970s.
You may say, oh, Dan, that doesn't matter to me. I'm middle class. I don't care if rich people get taxed on their stock earnings at double the rate they are now. You don't. Well, that's really dumb because you clearly haven't thought any of this through. You have a pension, you have a four one K. Why are those stocks worth something, they're worth what they're worth because other people are willing to buy them for their amount, right?
You can't tell me you have a baseball card worth a million dollars when you only have one buyer is willing to pay 10. Right. The baseball cards worth what your only buyers are willing to pay for. My house is worth six hundred thousand dollars. You have no offers for seven years. The only offer you have is two hundred thousand. You know what your house is worth? Two hundred thousand. Now you've got a bunch of rich folks who are now paying double the tax on their stocks they paid before, meaning their earnings on those stocks are going to go down, meaning no stocks to them are worth less.
So when your pension tries to cash those stocks out, all those rich people who are going to buy them up are only going to buy that many fewer stocks because they don't have as much money. Meaning you don't either. Oh, it's not going to affect me. That's the rich idiots. Good luck with that one. You clearly haven't taken an economics class. Those air quotes, rich idiots, are the ones buying the stocks from you, keeping the valuations high.
Yeah, yeah. And before. This one's a doozy, I told you about this the other day. So Ron Widen, the ranking Democrat, suggesting taxing unrealized gains before the investor sells, using a mark to market scheme. Folks, I talked about this this freak, my mother in law out. Ron Widen is a prominent Democrat in the Senate that is actually talking if they get in charge and take power about taxing stocks you haven't even sold. By the way, no refunds if you lose money on the stock.
You haven't even sold the. You understand what I'm saying, right? You bought a stock 15 years ago when IBM, it's up one hundred percent, you bought it whatever, at 50, it's worth one hundred. You haven't sold it. You're going to have to pay taxes on the gains. You don't even have you haven't sold the stock unrealized gains. It's right there in The Wall Street Journal. That's a real doozy coming down the pipeline. Good job, Joe.
Well done. Anyway, got Biden on a record about that you start taxing on, you want to crash the stock market tomorrow, one last one and we'll rock and roll for the day here. You want a business? There you go. Your corporate tax is going back up again. Your business is going to be taxed at the new rate of twenty eight percent from twenty one percent. To see how this compares globally and America's state taxes on corporate income eight point eight percent.
California nine point five. In Illinois last year, the European Union's average top rate for businesses is twenty one point eight percent. Don't be surprised if U.S. companies all return to the pre Trump pattern of moving their headquarters overseas. You like that? So your income taxes are going up, your payroll taxes are going up, your state, your taxes on your stock gains are going to go up, your taxes on your stock gains you don't even have are going to go up.
And if you own a business, it's about to go overseas where the tax rates are going to become dramatically more competitive as your business taxes go up, too. Sounds like a real winner. Can't wait to vote in twenty twenty. If you love the sound of that, Joey B is definitely your guy. One hundred percent, you can only hope he will forget these tax plans when he gets into office and not remember. That's your only hope right now that he won't remember actually discussing the stuff I just told you about.
That's your only hope to save your wallet. I'm very sorry. All right, folks, thanks again for tuning in. I really appreciate it. Please subscribe to the show on Apple podcasts and at YouTube dotcom slash Bongino. We'd like to get to a million possible going five hundred 500000 subscribers on YouTube. Let's get to a million YouTube dotcom slash by. I really appreciate we put a lot of work into the video show. We appreciate your support.
Thanks again. See you tomorrow. You just heard Dan Bongino.