Editor's Note: This transcript was automatically transcribed, so mistakes are inevitable. You can contribute by proofreading the transcript or highlighting the mistakes. Sign up to be amongst the first contributors.
September is National Life Insurance Awareness Month, but with everything going on right now, a lot of people are wondering if it's possible to buy life insurance at all. That's where policy genius can help. In minutes, you can work out how much coverage you need and compare quotes from top insurers to find your best price, all at policy genius. Dotcom policy genius works for you, not the insurance company. So if you hit any speed bumps during the application process, they'll take care of everything.
They even have policies which allow eligible customers to skip the in-person medical exam and do it over the phone. So if you need life insurance, head to policy genius dotcom right now to get started, you could say 1500 dollars or more a year by comparing quotes on their marketplace policy genius when it comes to insurance. It's nice to get it right.
The Rachel Maddow Show weeknights at nine Eastern on MSNBC.
Thanks for being here on a Monday night. Here's something we did not know until now. In November, this past November, you might remember there was a little bit of a health scare or at least a lot of health questions raised about President Trump. It was a Saturday afternoon in mid-November and President Trump was seemingly rushed off to Walter Reed Medical Center. This was an unannounced trip. It was a surprise. It led to widespread discussion about what might conceivably have gone wrong for the president medically that day.
That would lead to that kind of a rushed trip. The president leaving on an unannounced trip to Walter Reed Medical Center with his personal physician writing by his side. The White House insisting that it was for portions of an annual physical. But the Saturday visit was different from his two previous presidential physicals, raising concerns about his health.
Those were on his official schedule, took more than four hours and were not done in phases.
That was late last year, mid-November. The White House later cooked up some sort of weird story about how that sudden unannounced trip to Walter Reed had actually been a long planned segment of the president's annual physical.
It was like doing a piece of it, as if physicals are a thing that happened in episodes over the course of a season or something. It was very strange. That's not how physicals work. President Trump is the oldest person ever elected to the presidency, even though Joe Biden is older than Donald Trump. Biden's campaign has recently made an issue out of Trump's seeming unwell, seeming doddering and occasionally out of it. The Biden campaign and supporting PACs run ads now showing Biden running around and biking and lifting weights and looking strong while they show Trump wobbling all over the place.
The Trump campaign naturally has responded in kind, claiming that Biden is really the frail one and actually Trump's health is just fine. But even if they are going to contest the presidency this year on those grounds, there does remain this unexplained Walter Reed trip last November. People who've worked at the White House say the White House medical office is so well equipped that White House medical staff can handle on site all but the most serious incidents without a president ever having to be rushed off campus from the White House to a hospital, but rushed he was that Saturday afternoon in mid-November.
What was that all about? Well, tomorrow, this book comes out, it's called Donald Trump versus the United States Inside the Struggle to Stop a President. It's by two time Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt. And we get a little bit of a hint about what might have happened there on page three. Eighty nine. Quote, Under the Constitution meant something and was worth defending or it wasn't. Pelosi contended the Senate would also almost certainly not convict, but that wasn't the point.
This was for the record and for history. The whistleblower on the matter had accomplished what everyone before him had failed to do. He'd stopped President Trump in his tracks and had him on the path to being impeached. Two months later, on a Saturday afternoon in mid-November, as Democrats moved toward their impeachment vote, Trump made an unexpected visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. The White House played off the trip as part of the president's annual physical, but provided no other details about the examination.
Raising questions about the president's health and reporting for this book, Schmitt writes, I learned that in the hours leading up to Trump's trip to the hospital, Ward went out in the West Wing for the vice president, Mike Pence, to be on standby to take over the powers of the presidency temporarily.
If Trump had to undergo a procedure that would have required him to be anesthetized, Pence never assume the powers of the presidency. The reason for Trump's trip to the doctor remains a mystery.
So we still don't know why President Trump was rushed off to Walter Reed last November. But we do know now, thanks to Michael Schmidt's reporting, that whatever it was, it was serious enough that the vice president was warned to be on standby, that the president might have to be put under general anesthesia, which would occasion Mike Pence having to temporarily become president. And he had a warning to be doing that. And I mean, to state the obvious, that is not something that happens when you go in for a segment of your annual physical.
If you had to go under general anesthesia to have an annual physical, nobody would have an annual physical. Michael Schmitt's new book, again, it's out tomorrow, is full of stuff we did not know before, which itself is saying something because Michael Schmidt has been a scoop machine at The New York Times since Donald Trump has been president. He has reported a lot, but there is a lot that is new here. Here's another one. This is about the Mueller investigation and specifically what the president thought he could do to get out of it if need be.
This is amazing. People talk about like, oh, there's too many lawyers in public service in this case, maybe a little more lawyer in the in a little more legal knowledge for this particular public servant. Might have been on this front page 18 quote, To anyone paying attention, Trump looked like he was in trouble, but he still didn't seem to get it. Instead of taking a disciplined approach led by experienced Washington white collar defense lawyers, as Bill Clinton had done when he was under investigation, Trump had initially put together a hodgepodge legal team of undisciplined lawyers and television pundits, and the same way that it used the tabloids in New York.
He thought he could use his Twitter account to undercut Robert Mueller. Even as the intuitively sense the danger Mueller posed to him, he still coped with that danger with bravado and arrogance, the same way he had managed banks, creditors, civil lawsuits and divorce lawyers throughout his public life. At one point, as the investigation seemed to be intensifying, Trump told White House Counsel Don McGahn that there was nothing to worry about because if it was zeroing in on him, he would simply settle with Mueller.
He would settle the case as if he were negotiating terms in a lawsuit. Robert Mueller was not suing Donald Trump. Why did he think he could settle? He thought he could he could pay Muehler. And that would make the Mueller investigation go away. In Michael Smith's new book, he also reports that that same White House counsel, Don McGahn, was personally responsible for choosing two of our nation's Supreme Court justices, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, as well as choosing most of Trump's other judicial nominees because the president apparently had no idea and he just let Kavanaugh do it.
Excuse me. Let McGann do it. Quote, McGann had accepted the White House job on the condition that he essentially serve as a committee of one to determine whom Trump would nominate to the federal bench, including district courts, appeals courts and Supreme Court vacancies. Unlike previous administrations that relied on teams of White House and Justice Department officials who spent months, if not years carefully deliberating on candidates for judicial nominations, again, streamline the process and just ran it out of his own office.
When he settled on candidates, he'd present them to Trump, who would approve the nominations without raising many questions. Simple as that. This hastened the pace at which the administration could get nominations to one of McGann's closest allies in Washington, the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, who would then ram them through the Senate. And just in case the power of that is lost upon us, that that decision making power just being delegated sort of without a thought to one White House employee.
Michael Schmidt also reports in his new book that President Trump's own proposals for who should be on the Supreme Court were number one, Rudy Giuliani, and number two, Andrew Napolitano, the judge from Fox News.
Giuliani and Judge Andrew Napolitano from Fox News were the president's big ideas for his two Supreme Court vacancies, but instead he let McCain do them.
Of course, he's also a man who reportedly also believed he could pay money to settle any adverse findings from the Mueller investigation. So here's more Michael Schmidt describes in his book, President Trump in April. Twenty eighteen, convincing himself that he personally, he the president, could prosecute and lock up Hillary Clinton and James Comey. And he tried to. This is remarkable. This starts on page three of Michael Schmidt's new book, which is out tomorrow. Quote, In the middle of April, Trump turned to one of the few people in the White House who, in spite of their differences, he believed, can actually get something done, done McGann and an Oval Office meeting.
The president complained to him again about Attorney General Jeff Sessions for his refusal to prosecute Hillary Clinton and James Comey. Trump told him again he wanted to order Sessions to prosecute them if Sessions didn't want to do it. Trump said he wanted to use his power as president to prosecute Clinton and Comey on his own. It was a startling disclosure, even for Trump immediately began realize that the president's determination to use the justice system to selectively direct prosecutions against his enemies was an enormous problem.
Trump was already under investigation for obstructing justice, for his firing of Comey. Now, his push for revenge, a blatant abuse of presidential power, could put Trump in the position of trying to prosecute a potential chief witness against him. Trump's request also showed again that the president had little idea how prosecutions actually functioned because the president has no power to order someone to be charged with a crime. First of all, McCain told the president, you can't prosecute anybody.
Second of all, that's the Department of Justice's job. And if you do that, they are all going to quit. Trump said he did not understand he was the president and ran the executive branch. Why couldn't he tell the Justice Department whom to prosecute? Then over the next five or 10 pages of his book, Mike Schmidt explains in great detail and quotes liberally from the written memo that Don McGahn prepared for President Trump, telling him that, no, he couldn't personally prosecute anybody.
Schmidt quotes from it in part, again, saying to the president in this memo, you've asked what steps you may lawfully take if you disagree with the attorney general's decision not to pursue criminal prosecution or not to conduct further criminal investigations, McGann said in the opening paragraph of one memo. The line seemed charitable to Trump, who had rarely asked his lawyers whether something he wanted to do was legal. It's not as if Trump had gone to Meghann and specifically asked what was legal.
He just wanted to know how he could throw Clinton and Comey in prison. Yeah, in case you're thinking about what a second term of the Trump presidency might be like, here's a little window into what he thinks he ought to be able to do.
As quoted by Michael Schmidt in this new book, The Legal Guidance that Trump got from his White House counsel, Don McGann told him he couldn't personally direct the criminal prosecution of his political enemies because that would cause a number of negative things to happen. McCann warned him that, for example, senior Justice Department people would quit in protest. He also warned him that if the president went ahead and tried to do that, he could be impeached and removed from office.
Well, those were warnings when Meghann was still White House counsel. Think about where the president sat now. Those were the warnings that kept him from trying to do that. But now he has been impeached already and he wasn't removed from office because Senate Republicans decided they didn't want to hear it. And now he's got William Barr at the Justice Department who seems willing to do absolutely anything to benefit the president. So the Justice Department, the attorney general, is going to first of all, he's not going to fire the attorney general to get him to do something that he wants.
It's not going to threaten that. Won't Bill Barr do for this president doesn't have to worry about mass resignations at the Justice Department, not under Bill Barr. And he clearly, clearly doesn't have to worry about impeachment being removed from office. So do you think the president would feel constrained by those bounds on his behavior in a second term now that we've got black and white evidence about what he wanted to do with his power in his first term?
Michael Schmidt at The New York Times was first to break the news that Trump had told FBI Director James Comey that he wanted him to go easy on Mike Flynn, to go easy on national security adviser Mike Flynn, basically to to ease up in that criminal case against Flynn. Comey wouldn't agree to that. Comey got fired. Comey ultimately gets threatened with prosecution by the president for his troubles. Flynn didn't get prosecuted by the Justice Department for a time. But then when President Trump got his new attorney general in place, Bill Bah Bah went ahead and followed through on that old request from Trump, and he did drop the charges against Flynn.
Just today, a full panel of judges on a federal appeals court ruled that the judge in Flins case doesn't have to accept that decision at face value, at face value appeals court just ruled that if Barr dropped those charges against Flynn for improper reasons, the judge doesn't have to go along with it. This stuff is all still alive. The stuff is all still working its way through the courts in some cases. But now with reporting like this, we know so much more about it.
Schmidt, for example, reports that in the lead up to the twenty sixteen election in the summer of twenty sixteen, the intelligence community knew some of what Russia was doing, but they really didn't get it. They could observe that Russia was hacking documents and stealing them, but they thought Russia just wanted secrets. They thought Russia was just taking information for their own edification. They did not realize at all that the Russians were going to take that information and repurpose it.
They were going to dump it back on the American public and the American media as misinformation to try to try to hurt Hillary Clinton's chances of becoming president. If you were hoping that congressional leadership might have been more attuned to those kinds of risks in the summer of twenty sixteen, Michael Schmidt further reports that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell fell asleep in the summer of twenty sixteen in the middle of a classified briefing on what Russia was doing. Senator McConnell's office is denying that, but that is reported in Michael Schmidt's new book, Classified Briefings when they give you all the good stuff.
The reports that McConnell again fell asleep. Michael Schmidt also reports that Trump tried the you must be loyal to me thing that he did with Comey on another potential FBI director. Here's how Schmidt tells that story. Quote, The day after the day after the president fired Comey, Trump had called John Kelly, who was then secretary for the Department of Homeland Security. Trump told John Kelly he wanted him to become the next FBI director, but the president added something else.
If he became FBI director, Trump told him Trump told him Kelly needed to be loyal to him and only him. Kelly immediately realized the problem with Trump's request for loyalty. He pushed back on the president's demand. Kelly said he'd be loyal to the Constitution and the rule of law, but he refused to pledge his loyalty to Trump. In addition to illustrating how Trump viewed the role and independence of senior officials who work for him. The president's demand for loyalty tracked with Comey, his experience with Trump.
Trump had, of course, denied Comey as account of the president at a private White House dinner demanding that Comey pledge his loyalty to President Trump. But here was another senior administration official recounting an almost identical demand from the president, a demand that had come the very day after Comey was fired. Schmidt goes on to explain that had Robert Mueller's team demanded a longer and more detailed interview with John Kelly, they might have gotten around to that story. But in their relatively short interview of him, they didn't get to that.
And so they missed that, which might have helped them on whether or not the firing of Comey was obstruction of justice. There's also, I should tell you, on the John Kelly front there, there is a moment in which John Kerry, John Kelly describes something about Trump as the equivalent of French kissing, French kissing a chainsaw. And I could explain all that part of it to you, but you're going to have to read the book for that one.
Michael Schmidt also reports in this new book, The Back Story, on how White House officials tried to stop Jared Kushner and the president's daughter Ivanka from getting top level security clearances because of some warning that turned up in the investigation into whether or not they should qualify for that kind of clearance, some sort of highly compartmented information that John Kelly was briefed on, which led to a strong recommendation that Jared Kushner not receive a top level clearance. Nevertheless, the president overruled that objection and said that Kushner should get one as well as his daughter, Ivanka.
This is from Schmidt's book, May. Twenty second twenty eighteen chief of staff's office, The West Wing. Don McGann's recommendation meant nothing to trump. The following day, he told John Kelly that despite the concerns of the agencies and over McGann's objections, he would grant Kushner and Ivanka top secret security clearances. Like Meghann John Kelly felt the need to take measures to protect himself at that point. Memorandum for the file. Read the memo at the top. The subject line read re security clearances for Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.
The memo was only one paragraph. It said this, quote, The president of the United States has ordered that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump be allowed to access national security information up to the top secret level. Accordingly, Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump shall be granted top secret security clearances. And that's how we protect national security. Now you've got the White House counsel and the White House chief of staff having been briefed on highly compartmented classified information that led those officials to say, no, these people cannot have high level officials.
It is not safe as a matter of national security. They make this recommendation explicit to the president. The president says, I don't care, give them the security clearances anyway. They do so and then write a memo to file memorialising that. That's why they did it. That's how we protect national security now. The thing that Michael Schmidt reports here, though, in this new book that is most unnerving, though, is directly about the president and himself and it's something that we all thought had happened.
But it hasn't and it's I just ever since I got a hold of Schmidt's book, knowing that I was going to be able to interview him about this tonight, again, the book comes out tomorrow. I have tossed and turned about this because I find this very upsetting and unsettling. Here's the major news here from our quote Schmidt directly here, quote, It would take me a year to put together the pieces of what I believe is one of the most important parts of the Miller report, what it did not contain back in May, twenty seventeen, the FBI had opened a two pronged investigation into whether Trump obstructed justice and whether he was a Russian agent.
When Mueller took over the investigation, the acting FBI director, Andrew McCabe, had briefed him on this over nearly two hundred pages. Mueller's team took on the question of whether Trump had obstructed justice. But nowhere in the unredacted version of the report was there a thorough examination of Trump's ties to Russia. The report said nothing about whether Trump posed a threat to national security or whether his long standing ties to Russia were problematic. Schmidt says, quote, In reporting for this book, I spoke to several people involved in the Mueller investigation.
They told me that investigators never undertook a significant examination of Trump's personal and business ties to Russia. For instance, they said investigators knew if financial documents that might show Trump's ties to Russia, but they never pursued them. Mueller didn't explain himself along these lines. If the American public or official Washington had expected the Mueller investigation to answer questions of the president's loyalties that only a counterintelligence investigation could answer, it would not. And reporting for this book, Schmidt says, I discovered why.
In May twenty seventeen, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had appointed Robert Mueller to pick up where acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and the FBI had left off in their two investigations to counter the obstruction investigation and the counterintelligence investigation. But in handing off the investigation from McCabe and the FBI to Mueller, Rod Rosenstein had suspended the counterintelligence investigation into Trump. Again, this is the this is the investigation basically into whether Trump is a foreign agent, whether he is compromised by a hostile foreign power.
According to Michael Schmidt's new book, Rod Rosenstein called off that part of the investigation. Rosenstein, quote, believed that the decision by McCabe and top counterintelligence investigators at the FBI to open the inquiry into whether Trump was a Russian agent in the first place had been precipitous and premature. Without informing McCabe, Rosenstein told Mueller that his investigation should concentrate on whether crimes were committed. It should not be a fishing expedition into whether President Trump was a Russian agent. If Mueller's prosecutors wanted to expand their investigation, they could come back to Rosenstein and ask for the authority to do so.
But Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had foreclosed any deeper inquiry before the investigation even began. Just trying to factor this in, trying to factor this into what we have learned over the past few years, right?
I mean, there has been public reporting that we've all been aware of for years now that the FBI opened a criminal investigation into the Russian interference in our election and a counterintelligence investigation into bluntly whether the president is or was a Russian agent, whether the president is doing the bidding of a hostile foreign power, whether they either have leverage over him or his otherwise signed up with them. When that second investigation didn't turn up in the Mueller report, we assumed that Mueller had done it.
But that investigation had been continued by the FBI outside of Mueller's purview. Indeed, on page 13 of the report, Mueller and his team said that any counterintelligence stuff that they turned up over the course of their investigation, they fed back to the FBI for the FBI to handle it on their own, separate and apart from what Mueller were doing. But now in this book, Michael Schmidt from The New York Times reports that Mueller didn't investigate the president's ties to Russia and whether he was compromised, including by any financial involved with them.
But neither did the FBI. Rosenstein told them they couldn't do it, and so they didn't do it either. The FBI apparently thought that Mueller was doing it. Mueller thought that the FBI was doing it. Nobody did it. Senate intelligence report we just learned two weeks ago didn't look at it either.
Nobody's done it all these years in no entity of the US government has ever investigated whether the president is compromised by his relationship with Russia all these years in. Mike Schmidt joins us next. These past few months, I've become a pro at coloring my hair at home, and that's all thanks to the actual pros at Madison Reed, Madison Reed is game changing color. You can do yourself in under an hour. It's simple to get started. Just go online, take their color quiz to find your perfect shade and they'll deliver it right to your door.
With Madison Reed, you'll get all the good stuff. Gorgeous, multidimensional color and nourishing ingredients like argan, oil and keratin without a lot of the bad stuff that usually comes with it. There's no ammonia and no smell whatsoever. And having the freedom to do whatever I want while my color processes is amazing. I can do things like ketchup on my favorite podcasts or finish that puzzle I've been neglecting. You can try it today, starting at just 22 dollars at Madison Dasari Dotcom.
Use our code Matto and you'll get ten percent off plus free shipping on your first color kit. Again, that's code matto at Madison Dasht Retcon. Two things I love supporting nonprofits and making people smile. So you can imagine how delighted I was to find out about smile, train, smile, train treats, clefts by sponsoring surgery and essential care for children whose families can't afford it. In case you didn't know, clefs aren't just cosmetic. Children with cleft lips or palates are often malnourished, and 75 percent will die before age 10 without treatment.
Smile Train pioneered a sustainable model of partnering with local medical professionals in more than 90 countries. They provide them with the state of the art equipment and training they need to make safe and quality care possible for those who need it most. Go to Smile Train Dogs Tremseh today and donate twenty one dollars a month enough to cover the cost of one lifesaving cleft surgery each year. You can save a child's life for just 70 cents a day. Visit Smile Train AGT Dreamz today that smile train Moorgate Arms.
The New York Times was the first news organization to break the news that President Trump had asked FBI FBI Director James Comey to go easy on national security adviser Mike Flynn. They also revealed that Comey had written contemporaneous memos documenting that interaction that he'd had with the president that came out under the byline of New York Times reporter Mike Schmidt. Days after that bombshell, the Times dropped another one that Trump had also called Jim Comey, pressuring him to put out public word that he was not under that, that the president was not under investigation.
That was also reported by Mike Schmidt. Then the Times broke the news that the president had asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions to go back and retake control of the Mueller investigation after Attorney General Sessions had already recused himself. That, again, was reporter Mike Schmidt. Schmidt was then first to report that Trump had ordered special counsel Robert Mueller to be fired, only backing off when White House Counsel Don McGahn threatened to quit. When we later learned that Meghann, the White House counsel, had cooperated extensively with Mueller's investigation.
That, too, was reporting by Mike Schmidt. Schmidt was forced to report that in the days after James Comey was fired, the FBI had opened an inquiry into whether or not President Trump was secretly working as a Russian agent. That was a Michael Schmidt byline, too. Schmidt was first to obtain the questions that special counsel Robert Mueller wanted to ask of President Trump. He was first to break the news that Trump had wanted his Justice Department to prosecute political adversaries, including Hillary Clinton and James Comey.
On top of story after story after story on the Russia investigation, Michael Schmidt was also first to report that President Trump had overruled national security officials in order to give son in law Jared Kushner top secret security clearance. Hide your secrets, hide your ice cream. The New York Times is Michael Schmidt has been a fearsome scoop machine during the Trump era. And now with this new book that he's got out tomorrow, he's breaking even more news. Among the book's many revelations is the fact that no element of the US government, including the Mueller investigation, including the FBI, has ever examined President Trump's ties to Russia, including his financial ties.
It's not that anybody looked into that and found out all was fine, and that's why we never heard anything about it. Literally, no one has ever looked, not the FBI, not Mueller, not the intelligence committees, no one. Joining us now for the interview is Pulitzer Prize winning Washington correspondent for The New York Times, the aforementioned Michael Schmidt. The new book is called Donald Trump versus the United States Inside the Struggle to Stop a President. Mr.
Schmidt, congratulations on this. Thanks for being here tonight for the first interview.
Thanks for having me. So I've read enough of this stuff that I know that you're thinking now nobody's going to read the book because Rachel's read so much of it. But I want to I want to zoom in on what feels to me like the very heavy revelation you land on by the end of the book about there not being any counterintelligence investigation of the president. How does this how should people understand the importance of that? And how different is this from what we previously understood about what had been looked into and what hadn't?
I think that the the media and a lot of folks in the country assumed that Robert Mueller was doing something that he wasn't and then that he was going to be coming down from the hills and is going to get to the bottom of all of these questions in the midst of the Mueller investigation. We reported that that counterintelligence investigation had been opened. But when the Mueller report comes out, there's nothing there. It's not there. There's all this stuff on obstruction, but there's nothing about Trump's longstanding ties to Russia.
If you look at the questions that Mueller wanted to ask the president, it's all stuff related to twenty sixteen. It's not stuff about his history. So you looked at this and I said, well, we wrote this story about this counterintelligence investigation and we learned that McCabe thought that Mueller was absorbing it. So where did it go? So then I thought maybe it was in the redacted sections of the report. So I talked to people who had seen the unredacted sections of their report, and they said that it was not there either.
And I just thought that given all of the attention that Russia has received during the Trump presidency, that it was important to try and make it clear to the public that these questions were not answered by Mueller. Mueller said this in his testimony on Capitol Hill. He answered these questions, but it never got the attention to for the whole public to sort of digest it and understand it. And I went back and I looked at that testimony and I said, I need to try and tell as much of that story as possible because I don't think people understood what the Russia investigation was.
And I think that they thought it was something that maybe it wasn't. Mike, why did Rod Rosenstein not tell Andrew McCabe, who had opened who to approve the opening of this investigation?
Why did he not tell the FBI leadership that he had kybosh to this investigation? It seems like the FBI was under the impression that Mueller had taken that over Mueller. The way that he wrote about it in his report seemed to indicate that he thought he was feeding that stuff back to the FBI. You report that it ended up in neither of those camps. The investigation just wasn't done. Why did Rosenstein keep this from the FBI when he made this call?
Rosenstein felt that McCabe and the FBI were out of control. The McCabe had taken this decision to open the two pronged investigation on his own, and Rosenstein felt that McCabe may have conflicts of interest. The president had been attacking McCabe. The bureau was grieving over the firing of Comey. And here was the FBI opening up the most extraordinary investigation you can ever open on a president. Is the president compromised by our chief foreign adversary? And Rosenstein did not want this all to turn into a fishing expedition.
He did not want this thing to go on for years and for there to be this examination of every little thing in Donald Trump's life to figure out what his ties were to Russia. Rosenstein thought that it was not a secret that the president had an affinity towards Russia. He'd essentially run on that and that this was not something that should be undertaken. He says to Mueller, if you guys want to do more, you can come back and ask for that.
But he tells Mueller to focus on the twenty sixteen election focused on whether crimes were committed as part of that. Clearly, though, the at the leadership levels of the FBI, they weren't under the same under they didn't have the same understanding about this as Rosenstein did. I want to play you a real quick clip from Andy McCabe on 60 Minutes talking about what he thought happened to that counterintelligence investigation and why he thought it was safe. The control room.
This is clip number two. If you could just play this in a way that Mike can hear it and so can our viewers.
I met with the team investigating the Russia cases, and I asked the team to go back and conduct an assessment to determine where are we with these efforts and what steps do we need to take going forward. I was very concerned that I was able to put the Russia case on absolutely solid ground in an indelible fashion that where I removed quickly or reassigned or fired that the case could not be closed or vanish in the night without a trace.
You want to date documentary record? That's right. That those investigations had begun because you feared that they would be made to go away.
That's exactly right. Andrew McCabe thought that he had made sure that the counterintelligence case couldn't vanish in the in the night without a trace, that it couldn't be made to go away, at least without people knowing that had been made to go away. It seems like that's exactly what happened, though.
Well, this is about these eight days in May between the firing of Comey and the appointment of Mueller. Comey is fired. The White House relies on a document created by Rosenstein as the White House's rationale for the dismissal. The president comes out afterwards. He says a lot of unusual things. McCabe and these investigators eventually sit down in this period of time and open up this investigation. And they believe, McCabe believes by opening it, he will be protecting it, that he will be creating a paper trail and he's pushing Rosenstein to appoint a special counsel.
He's saying we need a special counsel. If we had had one in the Clinton email case, we would be on much different footing. This needs to happen. And Rosenstein goes ahead and he appoints Mueller. And McCabe thinks it's one of the greatest accomplishments of his life here. He has opened up these investigations. And Bob Mueller, one of the great heroes of the post 9/11 era, is going to take these over. And he will be a safe steward for these investigations.
And and McCabe goes in a brief Mueller on these investigations, and he assumes for the remainder of his time as the deputy FBI director, which lasts for several more months, that Mueller has taken these over and we'll do them. McCabe then two years later, picks up the Mueller report and looks at it and says it's not their.
Remarkable stuff. Michael Schmidt, New York Times Washington correspondent, the author of Donald Trump versus the United States Inside the Struggle to Stop a President, which comes out tomorrow and is chock full of craziness. Michael, congratulations. Good luck on the book tour. Thanks for being here first. I really appreciate you taking the time. Thanks for having me. All right, we got much more ahead here tonight. Stay with us. Hi, everyone. It's Joy Reid.
I'm so excited to tell you about my new MSNBC show, The Read Out every weeknight. I'm talking with the biggest newsmakers about the most pressing issues of our time, like Joe Biden, the words of president matter and so is President United States.
The first thing I'm going to do is stand up and talk sense and be honest with the American people. Level with them.
Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms. We need as many voices as we can have as possible sounding the alarm, encouraging people to wear masks and to take all precautions and to follow the science and the data. Senator Kamala Harris, we send folks into a war wearing camouflage. So what is going on here when you send camouflage uniformed officers into a city and many more?
You can listen to the readout as a podcast by searching for the readout. That's r e i o u t one word wherever you're listening right now and subscribing for free. Thanks for listening. So as we've been reporting the new book out tomorrow from New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt reports the startling news that nobody, not the Miller investigation, not the FBI, has ever done a counterintelligence investigation into President Trump's ties to Russia and whether there's anything there, financial or business or otherwise, that might indicate that he could be compromised by that hostile foreign power.
Nobody has ever investigated it. Nobody has ever looked at it. We got that news in the book that's coming out tomorrow for Schmidt. This dovetails with some other startling news we got late on Friday when the office of the director of National Intelligence announced that Congress would be cut off together, cut off altogether. When it comes to the question of Russia or any other foreign adversary interfering in the forthcoming elections, John Ratcliffe, the newly appointed director of national intelligence, told the Intelligence Committee late on Friday that he's suspending all in-person briefings for Congress on election security and foreign election interference just weeks before the upcoming election.
They are no longer going to do those briefings. Joining us now is Congressman Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California. He sits on the House Intelligence Committee, one of the committees whose members will no longer be getting these in-person election briefings from Meridiani. Congressman Small. It's nice to see you. Thanks for joining us tonight.
Thank you, Rachel. I feel like these stories are coming together in a way that is a little bit unnerving, both in terms of what we know, but also what we deliberately don't know, what hasn't been investigated and now what Congress won't be allowed to ask questions about. Are you worried that this is going to materially change what Congress knows, what you know about what's going on with this election? Yes, but we're not helpless, Rachel and Chairman Schiff is leading us in our own counterintelligence investigation on the committee, we are pursuing the Deutsche Bank records, of course, so we understand the president's personal, political and financial relationship with Russia.
But with this president, as you know, corruption is a reflex. And in twenty sixteen, while the Russians were trying to corrupt our democracy and the intelligence community was playing catch up, Donald Trump wasn't. He has corrupted individuals. He has corrupted our democracy and he continues to corrupt information. And so what we must do is to put in place the guardrails to protect this upcoming election and then add a post trump world. Make sure we put back in place everything that his corrupt wrecking ball has caused damage to.
In terms of whether we're going to have a post Trump world any time soon, I know that a lot of the Intelligence Committee's information is stuff that you can't discuss publicly. But we have heard reference, particularly from Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee, that the information about current foreign interference efforts in twenty twenty is quite serious stuff and is not just a replay of twenty sixteen. As alarming as that was, there's new information and it is something that requires significant national vigilance.
Can you tell us if you share that impression and if there is anything that the public ought to know that you feel like we don't otherwise have our arms around?
Yes, the American people must know what the Russians are trying to do, this president is not worthy of being re-elected without the plant, without a plan for Kowit. He has no plan for covid, and he cannot win an election without Russian interference or sabotaging the mail or conveying misinformation and inciting violence. And so instead, we are left with his DNI, the director of national intelligence, putting out these conflating threats that you have China and Iran and Russia all trying to meddle in our election when the evidence shows that there's just one country that has a preference for Donald Trump that is trying to tear down Joe Biden as a pariah in the past, has greater scope, capability and intent than any of the other countries.
And that's Russia. There's a lot more I wish I could say about that. But the president and his team are trying to keep it from the American people. This news about John Ratcliffe, the current DNI, saying that he's no longer going to brief Congress about any foreign election interference between now and the election comes on the heels of Robert Draper reporting in the New York Times magazine a couple of weeks ago that both of Trump's previous directors of national intelligence, both Dan Coats and Joseph McGuire, were both fired after refusing basically to go along with the president's line on Russia.
Dan Coats was fired after he refused to lie to the public about a judgment that Russia had favored Trump in the twenty twenty and the twenty sixteen election. Joseph McGuire was fired after his deputy briefed Congress about Russia's inclinations in the twenty twenty election. Now, clearly, there's a new director of national intelligence who wants to not get fired for the same reason. I wonder if this means that the office of the Director of National Intelligence is something in which you've lost confidence.
Should should the DNI still exist as Ratcliffe making decisions here that call into question whether he's the right man for that job?
Well, the office has been used to weaponize intelligence. And in fact, over the weekend, Director Ratcliffe said that China is the greatest threat, which does not match what we have been briefed on privately and what people have been let go for in public reporting, at least for telling the congressional committees, look, Rachel, we must make sure that we we receive unvarnished, intelligent intelligence assessments from intelligence officials. And right now, that is not what we are receiving.
They are really playing to an audience of one the president and not the American people. We have sixty five days to go. This is our last chance with the president, who is the first impeached president to run for re-election. The first president who's probably facing criminal charges if he's not re-elected, is willing to do anything to win and will sacrifice any value that we all treasure to do so. And so we must get it right in Congress. But your viewers are not helpless either.
They have to ask themselves, what are they willing to do to save their country? I hope it's at least being willing to vote. And I hope more than that it's being willing to ask others to vote as well. Congressman Eric Swalwell of California, a member of the Intelligence Committee, sir, thanks for your time tonight. It's nice to see you. Thanks, Rachel. All right, we'll be right back. Stay with us. Ask yourself, do I look like a radical socialist with a soft spot for rioters, really?
I want a safe America, safe from covid, safe from crime and looting, safe from racially motivated violence, safe from bad cops. Let me be crystal clear. Safe from four more years of Donald Trump. I want a safe America safe from four more years of Trump, that was the theme of Joe Biden's speech today, responding basically to a week's worth of Republican convention speakers who portrayed Joe Biden as basically a mugger hiding in the bushes right outside your house.
The common thread, the incoming president who makes things worse, not better, an incumbent president who sows chaos rather than providing order. Trump and Pence are running on this. And I find it fascinating, quote, You won't be safe in Joe Biden's America. And what's their proof, the violence we're seeing in Donald Trump's America? These are not images of some imagined Joe Biden America in the future. These are images of Donald Trump's America today. He keeps telling you if only he was president, it wouldn't happen if he was president.
He keeps telling us that he was president, you'd feel safe. Well, he is president whether he knows it or not. And it is happening. It's getting worse. And you know why? Because Donald Trump adds fuel to every fire. Donald Trump adds fuel to every fire, what Joe Biden is talking about specifically in that portion of his speech, the recent protests in Wisconsin over the police shooting of Jacob Blake, he remains in the hospital, reportedly paralyzed after police officers shot him in the back seven times today.
The president remarkably defended the actions of a 17 year old militia member who is charged with shooting and killing two protesters in Wisconsin last week, saying without any apparent basis that that young man probably would have been killed had he not shot the two people who he killed. Tomorrow, President Trump is set to visit Kenosha over the objections of Kenosha mayor and the objections of the state's governor. Wisconsin Governor Tony, ever sent a letter to President Trump today urging him to reconsider this trip, saying, quote, I am concerned your presence will only delay our work to overcome division and move forward together.
But where there is fire, this president is always standing by ready with more fuel. So as of right now, at least, his trip is still apparently on. But watch this space. One thing to watch for in tomorrow's news, too, interesting Democratic primaries in the great state of Massachusetts tomorrow. Democratic U.S. Senator Ed Markey is facing a challenge from Democratic Congressman Joe Kennedy, also the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee in the House. Democratic Congressman Richie Neal is facing a quite strong challenge from the mayor of Holyoke, Massachusetts, a young rising star named Alex Morse.
So eyes on both of those Democratic primary races tomorrow in Massachusetts, but that's going to do it for us tonight. See you again tomorrow night.
The Rachel Maddow Show weeknights at nine Eastern on MSNBC.