5 Best European Alternatives to Fellow AI [2026]

Fellow positions itself as a meeting system. You get structured agendas before the call, action items tracked afterward, templates, and AskFellow to search across your meetings. On paper, it sounds good, but shipping features isn't the same as people finding them useful.

For instance, if the buyer is a Data Protection Officer (DPO) under GDPR, a works council, a public-sector procurement office, or a European stealth startup, Fellow doesn’t have the same appeal.

The question stops being "does it take good notes" and becomes "can we actually sign off on this, and where does our data go?"

I've already gone through the best Fellow alternatives for teams that want better notes and pricing, but European buying decisions run on a different checklist.

Fellow, running on Canada Central AWS, isn't the best AI note taker for Europe because:

• Fellow doesn't have an EU data-residency option, and its default North American AWS stack sends your meeting data across the Atlantic
• Its security leads with SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA, both US frameworks, without the accredited ISO 27001, which an EU authority can verify independently
• Fellow’s AI bot is unreliable while joining meetings, leading to consent and privacy issues
• The free and Team tiers ration AI notes per user, so smaller European teams pay up or move on

You might think you’re out of options, but there are plenty of meeting management tools in the EU. I've done the legwork, and here are the five best European alternatives to Fellow.

Top 5 Fellow alternatives in Europe at a glance

1. HappyScribe

Best for: European teams that want accurate meeting notes and file transcription in 150+ languages, with a generous free tier and EU storage

HappyScribe is an AI meeting note taker built in Barcelona, one of the most linguistically diverse regions in Europe. EU data residency is central to how it functions.

HappyScribe joins your online meetings, transcribes conversations, and gives you notes and action items that you can trust. It’s simple, accurate, and secure.

For regulated teams that have hit a wall with Fellow, this is how HappyScribe serves them better:

HappyScribe vs. Fellow

HappyScribe's key features

1. European-grade security and data sovereignty

HappyScribe is a GDPR-compliant and SOC 2 Type II certified note taker. That means you’re in control of privacy and consent, and an independent firm has audited its data processes.

The recordings and transcripts are stored in a Tier IV, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001-certified EU data center that's physically separate from other customers. You also get a signed DPA, AES-256 encryption in transit and at rest, and the option to opt out of model training whenever you want.

For academic research or regulated businesses, HappyScribe lives up to the scrutiny of European buyers.

2. Meeting notes in 150+ languages, with a human option for 99% accuracy

HappyScribe generates AI meeting notes at 95%+ accuracy across 150+ languages and dialects, making it more reliable than Fellow in more languages. You can upload and transcribe files as well.

When accuracy is non-negotiable, like a court deposition or a research interview, you can order a human-verified transcript at 99% accuracy. Since Fellow is AI-only, there's no option for human-level accuracy.

You also choose how the note taker shows up. A visible bot joins in scheduled meetings when you want a clear record of consent, and for in-person or sensitive chats, you can record bot-free with the HappyScribe apps.

3. AI Chat for insights and meeting prep

HappyScribe’s AI Chat searches your meetings and files together, so you can ask it to fetch what a client agreed to months ago.

Every objection, decision, and insight is cited with timestamps and speakers, so you can click to hear the moment for yourself.

Before a call, you can pull action items and decisions from previous meetings, and let AI Chat help you walk into meetings fully prepared. It's the same idea as AskFellow, run inside an EU-hosted tool.

4. A free tier that actually lets you work

Fellow’s free plan is a glorified demo, which restricts you to only 5 meeting recordings. You can’t record new meetings until you upgrade, and unlocking unlimited recordings means paying $29 per month.

In contrast, HappyScribe’s free plan gives you unlimited meeting recordings, capped at 45 minutes. So you can run 10 calls a week and still be on the free tier at the end of the month. It’s ideal for EU startups, small research teams, agencies, and consultants.

When you decide to upgrade, paid plans start as low as $8.50/month when billed annually.

HappyScribe's pricing

AI transcription plans:

• Free: unlimited recordings, 45 minutes per recording
• Basic: $8.50/month billed annually or $17/month
• Pro: $19/month billed annually or $29/month
• Business: $59/month billed annually or $89/month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Human transcription service starts at $2.00 per minute.

HappyScribe's pros

• 95%+ accurate AI meeting notes and file transcription across 150+ languages and dialects
• Create and edit subtitles for accessibility and translate transcripts to share with global stakeholders
• All recordings and transcripts are stored in an EU data center, encrypted in transit and at rest
• You can record unlimited meetings on the free plan
• Use HappyScribe desktop and mobile apps for recording on the go, with or without a bot
• Connect meeting data to your stack through the MCP server, Zapier, and the HappyScribe API

HappyScribe's cons

• Not for real-time transcription

What are users saying about HappyScribe?

2. tl;dv

Best for: European sales teams that want org-wide meeting intelligence and video clips

tl;dv is a German company built around snippet-sharing workflows for sales and customer success teams. It records and transcribes calls on Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams, and lets you clip the moment a prospect raises an objection and send it to whoever missed the call.

tl;dv vs. Fellow

tl;dv offers unlimited meeting recordings and 10 meeting notes in the free plan. Unlike Fellow, if you can work within the limits, you might just go on without paying for a while.

The other major difference is where the processing happens. Fellow runs on Canada Central AWS, but tl;dv stores data on EU servers under the EU AI Act, which is why it avoids features like sentiment scoring.

Keep in mind that EU storage isn’t the same as EU processing. tl;dv runs its AI in different regions depending on your configuration, so confirm it before your DPO signs off.

tl;dv’s key features

• Timestamp moments mid-call, then turn them into clips and playlists for stakeholders
• tl;dv’s Ask AI searches across your entire meeting history to find insights, and schedules recurring reports around goals you set
• Track rep calls and surface coaching insights on higher tiers, which helps sales managers build conversation intelligence and improve playbooks
• Sync meeting data with Greenhouse, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, or Pipedrive on paid tiers

tl;dv’s pricing

• Free: Unlimited recordings and transcription, 10 AI summaries (lifetime)
• Pro: $29/month
• Business: $39/month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

tl;dv’s cons

• The free plan looks unlimited, but it cuts a few corners. Downloads are blocked, and recordings are stored for only 3 months, which pushes many users toward tl;dv alternatives
• It covers around 30 languages against Fellow’s 100, so multilingual European teams might not find it useful
• tl;dv’s transcript accuracy is inconsistent, and it locks better quality behind higher tiers
• The meeting bot occasionally joins without permission or fails to join at all

3. Sally

Best for: German-speaking teams that want a meeting system that their works council and DPO can sign off on

Sally is a Mannheim, Germany-based alternative to meeting management platforms, including Fellow. It helps you turn conversations into tasks and coaching insights, all within a searchable company knowledge base.

Sally vs. Fellow

Sally masks every piece of PII before the language model sees your transcript and runs that through Azure OpenAI in the EU region. It also contractually excludes your conversations from training.

Sally also answers something Fellow doesn't. It's documented for works council co-determination under German law (BetrVG), with opt-out commands to delete the session on request. Enterprise customers can run Sally on their own infrastructure.

Sally's key features

• Record online meetings on Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, or Webex, in-person appointments through the mobile app, or upload audio and video files
• Sally transcribes in 103 languages with dialect recognition, including Occitan, Luxembourgish, Welsh, and Norwegian Nynorsk
• You can build an org-wide searchable knowledge base from emails, notes, and chats with role-based access, so new hires and cross-functional teams can be up to speed in minutes
• Push notes and tasks into Dynamics 365, Notion, Salesforce, and HubSpot, or into the German business stack most US tools skip, including DATEV, Personio, and Haufe

Sally's pricing

• Starter: $12/month
• Pro: $45/month
• Enterprise: $99/month

Sally's cons

• Sally doesn’t have a free plan, only a 30-day trial, so you can't run it alongside your current tool past the first month
• The 98.8% accuracy in Sally's marketing is the Enterprise figure. Starter caps at 90.3% and Pro at 94.1%, so the accuracy you get tracks what you pay
• Parts of Sally’s AI meeting assistant are still marked coming soon, including chat on a single meeting and cross-meeting global chat
• Even though Sally supports 103 languages, it admits that only 14 languages have strong accuracy, and the rest hover between medium and lower accuracy

4. Noota

Best for: European recruiting and sales teams that need interview and call records for their ATS or CRM

Noota is a French tool that goes beyond transcribing meetings in general. It records sales calls and interviews and pushes the templated insights on candidates and deals to your systems rather than into a notes app.

Noota vs. Fellow

Fellow is horizontal, with the same agendas, notes, and action items. Noota goes the other way, with candidate reports, interview templates, job ad generation, and objection tracking built for recruiters and reps.

On data, Noota stores everything in EU data centers across France, Belgium, and the Netherlands. It also offers something Fellow doesn't: a text-only mode that keeps the transcript and discards the audio and video, which an administrator can enforce across the organization.

Noota's key features

• Build interview templates from your questions, then get a report per candidate with answers mapped against each one, so multiple interviewers can score the same person on the same criteria
• You can run your phone line through Noota, with a local number in 30+ countries, and click to call from the browser
• Ask Noota a question and get an answer grounded in what was said in your meetings, and import CVs or proposals to cross-analyze against them
• Noota Talent's agents can turn a hiring manager briefing into a scorecard, source and filter candidates in seconds, and screen candidates on your behalf

Noota's pricing

• Free: 300 minutes of AI notes per month
• Pro: $29/month
• Business: $49/month
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Noota's cons

• Noota's conversational intelligence infers emotions from words and intonation. The EU AI Act prohibits that in hiring, and the fine runs to 7% of global turnover for the employer using it, not the vendor
• The free plan archives your data after one month and caps you at three seats, which pushes small teams toward Noota alternatives
• Noota is still preparing for ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, while its Noota Talent suite claims both as achieved, so it’s a job for procurement to verify
• ATS and CRM integrations start on Pro, so the free plan can't push anything into your hiring system

5. Klang

Best for: Nordic public sector, legal, and research teams whose compliance office requires on-premise deployment

Klang is a Swedish company in Helsingborg that runs on speech models it built itself rather than calling third-party APIs. The standard cloud runs on Scaleway servers in France, single-tenant customers get a dedicated environment in Sweden, and regulated buyers can install the whole system inside their own network.

Klang vs. Fellow

Fellow is software as a service, so the strongest promise it can make about your data is a policy. Klang gives you the option to install it inside your own network as Docker images or Helm charts, on OpenShift, EKS, or bare metal, with a language model you supply. Nothing leaves the network, and it's approved for air-gapped environments.

That changes what your compliance office is reviewing. Instead of reading a vendor's data processing terms, they're signing off on a deployment running on hardware they already control.

Klang's key features

• Trace any AI output back to the exact audio clip it came from, which is the audit trail a legal or public sector file actually needs
• You can record in-person meetings and both incoming and outgoing phone calls from the mobile app, then connect the workspace to any agent over MCP
• Deploy in a single-tenant environment with its own database, domain, and web server, hosted by Klang or in your own data center
• Bring your own encryption keys, down to per-user keys, and require multi-factor authentication through BankID or an authenticator app

Klang's pricing

• Freemium: €0
• Pro: €20/month
• Team: Price on demand

Klang's cons

• Everything that makes Klang sovereign, such as on-premise, private cloud, BYOK, single sign-on, and audit logs, sits on the Team plan at price on demand, so you can't just self-serve into it
• Pro caps at 10 users, so growing past ten puts you in a sales conversation for the Team plan rather than a simple upgrade
• 17 languages against Fellow's 100, weighted toward Nordic and Western European, so a team that works across Baltic or smaller-language audio will find it limited

Which Fellow alternative should you choose in Europe?

The right European Fellow AI alternative depends on which problem is actually blocking you.

👉 If you want org-wide meeting intelligence and video clips, with a free plan, tl;dv is a solid option.

👉 If your notes have to land in DATEV, Personio, Lexware, sevDesk, or Haufe, Sally plugs into the German business stack the US tools skip.

👉 If most of your meetings are interviews or sales calls that need to connect to an ATS or CRM, Noota is built for exactly that.

👉 If your compliance office reviews the deployment and not just the contract, Klang runs on your own servers, offline, on a model you supply.

👉 If you want the strongest all-round replacement for Fellow in Europe, choose HappyScribe.

Each of the others fixes one part of the Fellow problem and asks you to accept something in return. HappyScribe doesn't.

Your recordings and transcripts sit in an ISO 27001-certified EU data center by default, notes come back at 95%+ accuracy with a human-verified option at 99%, and your meetings and files run through the same tool with subtitles and translation on top. Free plan gets you unlimited meeting recordings, and paid plans start at $8.50/month billed annually.

Fellow's real value was making meetings produce something. You don't have to give that up to keep your data secured in Europe.